The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
78 ratna
1. IV th International Conference
on
Advances in Energy Research,
IIT, Mumbai , December 10-12 , 2013
“Power Output Maximization of Partially
Shaded 4*4 PV field by Altering its Topology ”
Name of the Authors
,
Smita Pareek
&
Dr.(Mrs.) Ratna Dahiya
(NIT Kurukshetra)
12/10/2013
ICAER-2013
1
2. • Introduction
CONTENTS
• Modeling OF PV Module
• Modeling Of PV Array & Interconnection Schemes
• Simulation of Interconnection Schemes
• Results & Observations
• Conclusion & Future Works
REFERENCES
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
2
6. Advantages of Solar Energy
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The cost of the technology is decreasing almost
every few months and the efficiency is improving.
Free of Cost.
Need not to pay any utility bills.
No limitation to the availability
Rebates and incentives by Government
Sell the additional electricity generated .
No transmission cost.
Need not bother by power failures in the grid
Static Structure
Longer Life
On-site green power production
Silent & low maintenance.
Disadvantages of Solar Energy
•
•
Initial cost of the installation and equipment is high.
Need space for installing solar panels
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
6
7. Ways of producing power out of Solar Energy
Thermal route
Photovolatic route
(Converts light in solar energy into Electricity)
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
(Using heat for Generation of Electricity)
7
11. Modeling of PV Cell / Module / Array
Model
Electrical Scheme
Ideal model
Number of Parameters
(3)
Iph , Io and a
One-diode
model
(5)
Ipv , Io , Rs , Rsh , and a
Two-diode
model
12/10/2013
(7)
Iph , Io1 , Io2, Rs , Rsh , and a
ICCS-2013
11
12. MODELING OF PV CELL
Equivalent Circuit
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
12
19. Different Array Interconnection
Traditional Series-Parallel Interconnection Scheme
Modules are connected
in series to form strings
and then theses strings
are connected in parallel
12/10/2013
19
20. Module 1
Module 2
Series Combination
P-V and I-V characteristics of two Module in series with same Insolation (1000 & 1000 )
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
20
21. Module 1
Module 2
Module 3
Series Combination
P-V and I-V characteristics of three Module in series with same Insolation (1000 )
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
21
24. • These days’ solar PV arrays are being assimilated on
the rooftop of a building. Therefore PV array are
often under partial shadow .
• These shadows can be either easy-to-predict (like
neighbor’s chimney, nearby tree or neighboring
buildings etc.) or difficult-to-predict (passing clouds,
birds litter etc.).
• These shadows decrease the output power
obtained by PV arrays in a considerable manner .
• This makes the study of partial shading of modules
a key issue.
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
24
25. Module 1
Module 2
Series Combination
P-V and I-V characteristics of two Module in series with different Insolation (1000 & 200 W/m2 )
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
25
26. Module 1
Module 2
Module 3
Series Combination
P-V and I-V characteristics of three Module in series with different Insolation (1000 ,500 & 200 W/m2 )
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
26
27. TOTAL CROSS TIED
BRIDGE LINKED
Modules are first
connected in parallel
and
then
these
parallel connections
are
connected in
series.
12/10/2013
Some
of
connection of
connection
removed
ICCS-2013
the
TCT
are
27
28.
12/10/2013
TCT reduces mismatch losses from partial
shading significantly when compared to SP
Partial shading affects the modules’ short
circuit currents thus affecting the modules’
output currents at their MPPs.
This leads to a lack of coherence between
modules’ MPPs and array’s MPP.
In case of SP, this issue is more severe than that
in case of TCT.
The reason is that SP has more number of
series strings than TCT. Also, TCT interconnection
reduces the possibility of turning
ON
bypass
diodes, thus reducing the corresponding losses[4].
ICCS-2013
28
29. 4* 4 PV Field with SP Interconnection
Scheme
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
29
30. 4* 4 PV Field with TCT Interconnection
Scheme
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
30
31. 4* 4 PV Field with BL Interconnection
Scheme
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
31
34. The shadow is assumed to be moving shadow and two
cases are considered as explained below:CASE I: The moving shadow is assumed to be progress
on the horizontal modules (from left to right)
of last row as shown by column 1, 5, 6 & 7 of Table1.
CASE II: The moving shadow is assumed to be progress on the
vertical modules (from top to bottom) of first column
as shown by column 1, 2, 3 & 4 of Table1.
Assumption: It is assumed that modules which are
shaded are receiving Insolation equal
to 200 W/m2 and non shaded modules
are receiving Insolation equal to 1000 W/m2.
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
34
36. PV & IV Characteristics of Interconnectio
n Schemes for shading pattern as Shown
by
column
3
of
Table
I.
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
36
37. CONCLUSION
Series-Parallel (SP) interconnection produces maximum
power as compared to Total-Cross-Tied (TCT) interconnection
when shadow is predicted to be progress on last row of horiz
ontal
modules.
TCT interconnection produces maximum power as compared
to SP interconnections when shadow is predicted to be
progress on leftmost column of vertical modules.
Thus maximum power can be availed by choosing
interconnection scheme according to the shading pattern,
thus increasing the generated output power of arrays.
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
37
38. REFERENCES
[1]Ali Bidram, Student Member, IEEE, Ali Davoudi, Member, IEEE, and Robert S. Balog, Senior Memb
er, IEEE “Control and Circuit Techniques to Mitigate Partial Shading Effects in Photovoltaic Arrays
” IEEE Journal of Photovolatics,, Vol. 2, No. 4, October 2012,pp 532-547
[2]Luiz Fernando Lavado Villa, Damien Picault, Bertrand Raison, Member, IEEE, Seddik Bacha, Memb
er, IEEE, and Antoine Labonne ,” Maximizing the Power Output of Partially Shaded Photovoltaic
Plants Through Optimization of the Interconnections Among Its Modules ”, IEEE Journal Of Phot
ovolatics, VOL. 2, NO. 2, APRIL 2012, pp154-164
[3] Marcelo Gradella Villalva, J. R. Gazoli, and Ernesto Ruppert Filho “Comprehensive Approach to
Modeling and Simulation of Photovoltaic Arrays” IEEE Transactions on power electronics, Vol.
24, No. 5, May 2009 pp 1198-1208
[4] M. Z. Shams El-Dein, Student Member, IEEE, Mehrdad Kazerani, Senior Member, IEEE, and M. M.
A. Salama, Fellow, IEEE An Optimal Total Cross Tied Interconnection for Reducing Mismatch
Losses in Photovoltaic Arrays” “ IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy , Vol. 4, No. 1, January
2013, pp 99-107
[5] H. Patel & V.Agarwal, Senior Member, IEEE “MATLAB-Based Modeling to Study the Effects of
Partial Shading on PV Array Characteristics” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 23, No.
1, March 2008 pp 302-310
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
38
39. [6] Yuncong Jiang, Student Member, IEEE, Jaber A. Abu Qahouq, Senior Member, IEEE
and Mohamed Orabi, Senior Member, IEEE “Matlab/Pspice Hybrid Simulation
Modeling of Solar PV Cell/Module” 2011 IEEE pp 1244-1251
[7] Jan T. Bialasiewicz, Senior Member, IEEE,” Renewable Energy Systems with
Photovoltaic Power Generators: Operation and Modeling”, IEEE Transactions
onIndustrial Electronics, Vol. 55, No. 7, July 2008, pg 2752-2758
[8] M.Arun Bhaskar, B.Vidya, R.Madhumitha, S.Priyadharcini, K.
Jayanthi, G.R.Malarkodi” A Simple PV Array modeling Using MATLAB” 2011 IEEE pp
122-127.
[9] K. Ishaque, Z. Salam, H. Taheri, Accurate MATLAB Simulink PV System Simulator
Based on a Two-Diode Model, Journal of Power Electronics, 11 (2011)
[10] Y.-H. Ji, J.-G. Kim, S.-H. Park, J.-H. Kim, and C.-Y. Won, “C-language based PV array
simulation technique considering effects of partial shading,” in Industrial
Technology, 2009. ICIT 2009. IEEE International Conference on, feb. 2009, pp. 1 –6.
[11] E. Karatepe, M. Boztepe, and M. Colak, “Development of a suitable model for
characterizing photovoltaic arrays with shaded solar cells,” Sol.Energy, vol. 81, no.
8, pp. 977–992, Aug. 2007.
[12] K. Ishaque, Z. Salam, H. Taheri, Syafaruddin, Modeling and simulationof
photovoltaic (PV) system during partial shading based on a two-diode
model, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 19 (2011) 1613-1626.
12/10/2013
ICCS-2013
39