This document discusses a study examining the influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships. The study analyzed cephalometric radiographs of 122 patients, dividing them into high and low occlusal plane angle groups. It found a lack of consistency between ANB and Wits measurements in the high occlusal plane group, but agreement between the measurements in the low occlusal plane group. The results indicate ANB and Wits assessments may be influenced by occlusal plane inclination and lack certainty in high occlusal plane angle patients.
Influence of Occlusal Plane on ANB & Wits Assessments
1. WITS APPRAISAL
INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY
Leader in continuing dental education
www.indiandentalacademy.com
www.indiandentalacademy.com
2. Influence of occlusal plane
inclination on ANB & Wits
assessments of anteroposterior jaw
relationships
www.indiandentalacademy.com
3. Introduction
Angular
measurements are geometrically
sensitive & can give false results.
ANB angle is used to determine the
anteroposterior maxillomandibular
relationships.
It varies with the extension & inclination of
cranial base.
Routinely, ANB angle & Wits appraisal are
the most common cephalometric tool for
assessing AP jaw discrepancies.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
4. ANB
& Wits are related to vertical
features.
There is influence of the occlusal plane
angle & facial height on the ANB
assessment.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
5. Aim
The
primary purpose of this study were to
verify whether ANB & Wits assessments
show consistent results in patients with
high & low occlusal plane angles & to
determine whether specific cranial base
features have an important geometric
influence in the assessment.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
6. Materials & Methods
The
sample consisted of 122 patients, 44
males & 78 females.
Their mean age at the initial records was
13.5 (+/- 5.3 yrs).
The sample included the following types of
malocclusions
29 Class I
82 Class II div 1
7 Class II div 2
4 Class III
www.indiandentalacademy.com
7. Criteria for selection of cases
The
samples were selected based on
consecutive chronological orthodontic
patients started from 1995 to 2003, who
were treated & had standardized initial &
final records taken ( cephalo –lateral
radiographs).
Patients with cranio-facial deformities
were rejected.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
8.
All patients received treatment from the
same orthodontist.
Patients were treated by straight wire
fixed appliance, 0.018” slot brackets &
molar bands.
Headgears and lip bumpers were used
when appropriate.
Pretreatment (T1) & pretreatment (T2)
lateral cephalograms were taken from
the same cepahalostat.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
9. Orthodontic
treatment was performed
a) Without extraction in 99 patients.
b) With maxillary & mandibular extraction in
11 patients.
c) With maxillary premolar extractions in 10
patients.
d) With mandibular premolar extractions in 2
patients.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
10. Cephalometric
landmarks were identified
and traced on acetate paper by the
orthodontist.
All landmarks were digitized & all
measurements were computed by usind
DFPlus software.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
11. Landmarks
Basion,
Sella, Nasion, ANS, Point-A,
Point-B, Gonion, Gnathion, Menton
The occlusal plane was formed by the
half-distance point between the incisal
edges of the maxillary incisors & the
mesial cuspid tips of the mandibular
bilateral first molars.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
14. To
calculate for systemic & random errors,
a sub-sample of 5 randomly selected
radiographs was retraced & redigitzed.
Systematic errors was not statistically not
significant.
Random method errors, ranged from
0.5mm for S-Go to 1.0mm for Wits & from
0.3° for Y-axis to 1.2° for NSBa.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
16. Statistical method
All
data were computed with SPSS
software.
Paired t-test were performed to evaluate
treatment changes.
Pearson product moment correction
coefficients were calculated between T1 &
T2 variables.
Based on the descriptive statistics of the
total sample, 2 occlusal plane angle
groups were constituted.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
17. The
median of 15.3° for SNOP angle
divided the patients into high & low occlusal
plane.
The median of 73mm for the S-N distance
divided the patients into short and long
anterior cranial base sub groups.
The median of 123.4° for NSBa angle
divided the patients into small & large
cranial base angle subgroups.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
20. Results
Variable
n
Mean T1
SD
Mean T2
SD
Mean diff
SD
P
S-N
122
72.4
3.8
74.0
3.8
1.6
2.2
.01
SNBa
122
123.5
5.1
123.3
5.3
-0.2
2.3
.26
ANB
122
3.8
2.5
2.8
2.3
-1.1
1.8
.01
Wits
122
2.1
4.1
1.3
2.9
-0.8
2.7
.01
S-Go
122
73.9
6.8
79.2
5.9
5.3
5.0
.01
N-Me
122
118.5
8.4
124.2
7.8
5.8
6.2
.01
SNOP
122
14.9
4.2
14.1
4.0
-0.8
3.2
.01
Y-axis
122
85.0
3.8
85.4
3.8
0.4
1.7
.01
AP
proportion
122
0.62
0.04
0.63
0.04
0.01
0.02
.01
Ant
proportion
122
0.43
0.02
0.43
0.02
0.01
0.02
.30
Descriptive statistics for all patients at T1 & T2 are shown. Paired t test
showed Significant differences for variables, except SNBa & anterior
www.indiandentalacademy.com
proportion
21. There
was a
significant Pearson
product moment
correlation between
ANB & Wits for T1
& T2 data.
The lowest were
found between
ANB & Wits when
comparing T1 & T2.
Variable
ANB T1
Wits T1
ANB T2
Wits
T2
ANB T1
-
-
-
-
Wits T1
0.76
-
-
-
ANB T2
0.72
-
-
-
Wits T2
0.65
0.74
0.71
-
www.indiandentalacademy.com
22. Sub group
Variable
n
Difference
P
Short anterior cranial
base
ANB T1 & ANB T2
38
1.1
.01
Wits T1 & Wits T2
38
0.1
.95
ANB T1 & ANB T2
21
1.4
.01
Wits T1 & Wits T2
21
0.3
.64
ANB T1 & ANB T2
36
1.3
.01
Wits T1 & Wits T2
36
-0.2
.72
ANB T1 & ANB T2
23
1.1
.01
Wits T1 & Wits T2
23
0.6
.41
Long anterior cranial
base
Small cranial base
angle
Large cranial base
angle
Paired t test between ANB & Wits (T1 & T2) for high
occlusal plane angle group
www.indiandentalacademy.com
23. Sub group
Variable
n
Difference
P
Short anterior cranial
base
ANB T1 & ANB T2
29
0.9
.05
Wits T1 & Wits T2
29
1.1
.07
ANB T1 & ANB T2
34
0.9
.01
Wits T1 & Wits T2
34
1.6
.01
ANB T1 & ANB T2
28
0.5
.23
Wits T1 & Wits T2
28
0.6
.31
ANB T1 & ANB T2
35
1.3
.01
Wits T1 & Wits T2
35
2.0
.01
Long anterior cranial
base
Small cranial base angle
Large cranial base angle
Paired t test between ANB & Wits (T1 & T2) for low
occlusal plane angle group
www.indiandentalacademy.com
24. Paired
t tests were applied between T1 & T2 data for
ANB & Wits assessment in the high occlusal plane
angle & low occlusal plane angle.
In the high occlusal plane angle group, the
statistically significant differences between T1 & T2
by ANB assessment were not seen in the Wits
assessment foe all groups .
In the low occlusal plane angle group, the statistically
significant difference between T1 & T2 shown by
ANB assessment were confirmed by the Wits
assessment for the long anterior cranial base & large
cranial base angle group.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
25. A
statistically significant difference was
practically confirmed by ANB & Wits
assessment for short anterior cranial base
but not confirmed by both assessments for
the cranial base angle group .
www.indiandentalacademy.com
26. Discussion
The
most common doubts of the clinical
orthodontist revolve around 2 major questions
Does the patient have a skeletal malocclusion?
If so, to what degree?
Although ANB & wits are cephalometric tools
widely applied to evaluate AP relationship, there
is a significant lack of certainty.
Consequently, there is an intensive search for
new & better cephalometric & noncephalometric
diagnostic resource to assess jaw discrepancies.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
27. This
research is needed because vital
orthodontic decisions depend on correct
assessments.
Literature provide new formulas to assess
skeletal discrepancies, but further research is
required on traditional measurements, such as
ANB & Wits is still necessary.
The normal range of ANB angle is 2°+/- 3°.
The wits distance should be 0mm in females
& -1mm in males with skeletal class I
relationship.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
28. Geometric
effects causes the occlusal plane
angle to modulate the ANB & Wits
assessments.
This study attempted to identify agreement
or disagreement between ANB & Wits
assessments in high & low occlusal plane
angle groups, controlling for anterior cranial
base size & cranial base angulation
subgroups.
The general view of treatment effects shows
growth effects on the anterior cranial base
but no significant change in the cranial base
angle.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
29. ANB
& Wits significantly decreased with
treatment because 3/4th of the patients had
class II malocclusion at T1, orthodontic
mechanics were intended to decrease the
initial ANB angle.
Vertical growth occurs in posterior & anterior
facial heights, however, the AP proportion is
increased.
ANB & Wits assesses the same problem but
have fair correlations.
These results show at least 1 assessment
has a weakness per se.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
30. There
was clearly a lack of consistency
between them in the high occlusal plane
angle group.
It is suggested that, in high occlusal plane
angle group, ANB might have overestimated
AP positioning of the jaws or Wits have
underestimated AP positioning of the jaws.
In contrast, in the low occlusal group the
statistically significant difference between T1
& T2 of the ANB assessment were confirmed
by wits assessment for the long anterior
cranial base subgroup & large cranial base
angle subgroup.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
31. Conclusion
ANB
& Wits have important drawbacks
although they are routinely used in clinical
orthodontics.
Our results show a tendency for lack of
consistency between ANB & Wits
assessment in high occlusal plane angle
patients & a lack of certainty in at least one
measurement.
In the low occlusal plane angle patients, both
assessments were consistent.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
32. Reference
Longitudinal
changes in the ANB & Wits appraisal :
clinical implications –(AJODO 93 Aug) Samir E.
Bishara, Julie A. Fahl, Larry C. Peterson.
This study suggests that the ANB angle changes
significantly with age , while Wits appraisal indicates
that the relationship between points A B does not
change significantly with age.
Correlation coefficients shoed that the ANB angle &
Wits appraisal are significantly correlated.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
33. Relation
of Wits appraisal to ANB angle Järvinen AJODO 1988 Nov (432 - 435):
In this study the hypothesis was that the
relationship between the ANB angle and the
Wits appraisal could be declared by
measuring individual variations in their
reference systems and by constructing a
model of regression between them and the
parameters describing the reference systems.
www.indiandentalacademy.com