Similar a Vondráková, A: The influence of applied cartographic methods on the map information perception: quantification for various groups of users (20)
Vondráková, A: The influence of applied cartographic methods on the map information perception: quantification for various groups of users
1. The influence of applied cartographic methods
on the map information perception
quantification for various groups of users
Alena VONDRÁKOVÁ
This presentation is co-financed by the
European Social Fund and the state
budget of the Czech Republic
2. Principal points of research
lack of standardization or mandatory rules in cartography
choice of method of cartographic visualization
depends on the opinion of the map author
way of expressing the same information by different methods
of cartographic visualization leads to different user perception
what can affect the perception of the map
age, sex, education, previous experience, actual mood...
maps have to help their users to better understand geospatial
relationships, not to confuse the user
users have to get the information as quickly as possible
and as accurately as possible
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
3. Methods of cartographic visualization
set of rules to express the spatial characteristics in the map
often referred as:
methods of representation, means of expression, interpretive methods,
graphical representation, mapping expression, etc.
many ways of distribution and classification of these methods
primary classification: point, line, area
thematic classification: physical- and socio-economic geography
thematic methods: choropleth, isarithmic , dot density,
dasymetric, topographic...
type of material: tactile 3D, plastic, paper, metal...
type of presentation: digital, analog, on-line, off-line...
representatives of the Czech cartography:
Voženílek, Veverka, Konečný, Kaňok, Čapek, Drápela, Murdych...
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
4. Map information perception
Ways in which maps are read by users are crucial determinants
of the effectiveness of such maps. Board and Taylor, 1977
the influence of using different cartographic methods
of visualization on the information perception from a map
is something, that objectively exists
map information perception is individual
our aim is to objectify and quantify this user aspect
one of the possible solutions is offered by technology
of eye-tracking
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
5. Realization of the study
SMI RED 250
120 Hz, resolution 1680 × 1050 px
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
6. Realization of the study
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
7. Realization of the study
SMI Experiment Centre™
BeGaze™ Analysis software
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
8. Realization of the study
Statistical evaluation
AOI characteristics, fixations, saccades, mouseclicks...
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
9. Realization of the study
Visual evaluation
HeatMap
GazePlot
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
10. Realization of the study
Individual interpretation
BeeSwarm
ScanPath
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
11. Realization of the study
Comparison of respondents
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
12. Realization of the study
Group evaluation
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
13. Preliminary results
Data processing
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
14. Preliminary results
minimal influence of gender on the response time
in total cartographers answered one second faster
woman response was also one second earlier than man response
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
15. Preliminary results
influence of cartographic education is significant
difference in correct answers is 12% in cartographic education
and 5% between gender (women were more succesfull)
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
16. Significant differences
difference between cartographers and non-cartographers
problems with contour lines,
choropleth map and diagram map
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
17. Preliminary results
the most suitable for the presentation of terrain
was method of colour hypsometry
for the presentation of socio-economic data of uneployment
was the most appropriate diagram map
for the presentation of demographical characeristic
was the most suitable method of diagram map
big influence has also the choose of the type of chart
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
18. Conclusion
some questions seems easy and in the result they
are the most difficult for respondents
there are significant differences between sub-groups
of respondents identified by sex or cartographic education
we can train people how to read maps
– but can people train cartographers how to create maps?
it is needed to
validate maps
it is needed to take
into consideration
the user aspects
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
19. Discussion
future tasks
to make this experiment with regard to the age of respondents
try to identify control mechanism in user behaviour
(time of verifikation answers that the user find some time period
before
the mouseclick – such as control of other possibilities in AOI)
Using appropriate visualization methods can significantly
reduce the time needed for obtain required information.
Maps help their users to better understand geospatial
relationship...
Kraak and Ormeling, 2003
...and should not confuseConference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc
First InDOG Doctoral
them!
20. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
First InDOG Doctoral Conference, 29th October - 1st November 2012, Olomouc