Plagiarism and AI tools: an example of linking information- and digital liter...
Cope & Stuart Edwards - Internal collaboration: Working together to deliver Library and Information Skills Training (LIST)
1. Elly Cope & Emma Stuart Edwards
Internal collaboration:
Working together to deliver Library and Information
Skills Training Sessions (LISTS)
2. Some background on the University
• Originated as a trade school in Bristol in the 1890s
• Moved to Bath in the 1960s
• Pay a „peppercorn‟ rent
• University of Bath awarded its Royal Charter in 1966
• Science, Technology, Engineering, Maths (STEM)
• Balance:
• 54% male, 46% female
• Undergraduate: 10,563 ; Postgraduate: 4,574
Chancellor Lord Tugenhadt paying
the literal peppercorn rent
5. Development of LISTS
• Skills training in existence:
• Individual departments approaching library for further training
• SU programme SORTED – Student Officer Representative
Training, Education and Development programme
• Investment in „Turnitin‟ plagiarism software
• Development of RITTSS – Research Information Tools
Training Seminar Series
• Merge with the SORTED programme
• PG Skills programme
8. What’s different 2012-2013
• Maternity cover
• Moves between Technical Services and Academic Services
• More sessions delivered by Information Librarians
• Pairings
• Technical Services teaching
• Technical Services / Academic Services on all sessions
• New sessions
• Resource Discovery System
• SCOPUS
• Different approaches brought together
9. Example: Case study of Primo
• Those delivering the presentation developed it together
• Used real questions / reading lists to inform content
• Commonly asked questions
• Anticipated problems
10. Why we think it was good!
• Collaboration
• Working with each other!
• Knowledge sharing
• TS/AS skills brought together
• Cross-sector expertise
• New catalogue knowledge
• Able to deal with surprises
• Disabilities
• Room booking
• Equipment &/or props
15. External feedback cont.
Examples of student feedback when asked to complete
the sentence: “when I finished this session I felt able to…”
“…understand better what copyright is and clarify which
material I can use or not in my assignment”
“…understand how to be more critical of what I read”
“…research my dissertation topic more thoroughly”
16. Internal feedback
• Useful working with TS staff in terms of better working
relationships, understanding more about what each other do.
• Team-teaching requires collaboration and can be nerve-
inducing, so it's quite a bonding project.
• Great to have fresh pairs of eyes, different perspective.
• AS staff very much benefited from the TS staff's technical know-
how for the students who do want that kind of info!
• Good opportunity for TS staff to teach which opens up other
job/career opportunities.
• Opportunity to observe and talk through problems students
encountered, as in a technical role like mine, it's quite easy to
lose touch with the end-user experience.
17. What could improve
• Room booking!
• Increased dialogue between the Students‟ Union and
the Library
• Focus on target audience
• Undergraduate
• Postgraduate Taught
• Timing / assignment of sessions
• Knowing which session you‟re delivering well in advance
• Overhaul of presentations
• New examples / content
• Booking form questions
• Special requirements
18. What’s next…
• Closer collaboration with the Students‟ Union?
• More collaboration internally
• Consultation with Technical Services on areas of
expertise
• E.g. asking about Primo for session planning
• E-books
• E-journals
• More LISTS sessions
• E-journals
• E-books
• Mobile technologies
19. Questions & Contact details
Elly Cope
@ellycope
e.cope@bath.ac.uk
Emma Stuart Edwards
@embrarian
e.stuartedwards@bath.ac.uk
Editor's Notes
Humanities subjects with a Science focus, Mechanics & Engineers needed languages – historic due to Airbus bringing employees to UK, foreign colleagues