The document provides instructions for teachers to score student work using a rubric and provide feedback. Teachers are asked to score sample student work independently, then compare scores and come to a consensus as a group. They are also instructed to discuss what went well with the project, how rigor could be improved, and how effectively the protocol worked for creating a shared vision of scoring.
12. What are student being asked to do in this
task?
What would a score of Proficient work look
like from 6-8th grade students for the PO’s
listed? Give specific examples
13. Atwhat level would you score each
student’s work? Why?
Compare and Share what you
scored the students work.
As
a table come to a consensus
about the score of student work.
14. What warm and cool feedback would you
share with our team?
What was strong about the project?
What can we do to add rigor to the project?
15. How did the protocol work for creating a
middle school vision for using the scoring
rubric?
-Share the culture one pager -participants write a list on chart paper of what students are being asked to do-share a copy of the PO’s and rubric with participants- Particpants write a list on chart paper
- Why? – point to evidence that meets the criteria you created in the first round- After the table comes to a consensus we can share as a whole group
Just have participants discuss these questions and then give them the exit ticket template