SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 27
1

            Smoking habits in Greek adults
           and their relation to body weight.
     (Data from first national epidemiological large scale
       survey on the prevalence of obesity in Greece)



          E. Chala, I. Kaklamanos, I. Ioannides,
      T. Tzotzas, M. Kaklamanou and E. Kapantais

Hellenic Medical Association for Obesity (HMAO), Athens, Greece.




     1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
2


     The present study is part of a nationwide,
       cross-sectional epidemiological study
   conducted from February 2003 to June 2003.

This study was designed to estimate obesity prevalence
            in Greek children and adults and
  to identify factors associated with obesity indices.

           One such factor is smoking habits .




     1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
3
    Subjects and Methods (a)
• Sample selection: Data were collected by a
  questionnaire from all members of households,
  through their children aged 13-19 years, who
  had direct measurements at the secondary
  schools. The method used for school selection
  was that of proportionate stratified random
  sampling.
• Procedure: Gym instructors were trained on
  anthropometric techniques in order to help the
  children taking measurements at school, and
  explain them how to help their relatives to take
  the appropriate measurements.

 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
4

    Subjects and Methods (b)

• Questionnaire: Households received a sealed
  envelope with instructions and with a
  questionnaire seaking information on factors
  associated with obesity (socioeconomic status,
  dietary habits, physical activity status,
  smoking habits, etc)




1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
5


    Subjects and Methods (c)




                  Male             Female
                 (8090)            (9313)
      age      44.6±10.5          41.5±11.1



1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
6
       Subjects and Methods (d)
   • Weight (kg)
                        Calculation of BMI (kg/m2)
   • Height (m)

   • Waist circumference(cm)              Calculation of WHR
   • Hip circumference (cm)               (waist-to-hip ratio)

        Statistical analysis used SPSS version 11.5.
Results on BMI, WC and WHR were calculated as mean±SD.
      Comparisons were made by student’s t-test and
 non-parametric tests. Proportions were compared using
   the X2 test. Multiple regression analysis was applied
     to estimate the contribution of various factors on
              the prediction of obesity indices.


    1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
7

     WHO definitions for BMI

    <18.5:          underweight
18.5-24.9:          normal weight
25.0-29.9:          overweight
    >30.0:          obese
    >40.0:          morbidly obese



1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
8
          Cut-off points
      of Waist Circumference
   <94cm: low risk
94-102cm: increased risk                           For men

  >102cm: substancially increased risk

   <80cm: low risk
                                                      For
 80-88cm: increased risk                              women

   >88cm: substancially increased risk


1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
9

                         Results

      % smoking and non-smoking in males and females


    100
                39,1
    80                             67,5       non-smokers
    60                                        smokers

    40          60,9
                                   32,5
    20

     0
          males (8090)      females (9313)




                       X2=1409.4, p=0.000

1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
% smoking and non-smoking in males in the 3 main               10
                             age groups



      100
                             35,9       44,3
       80       48,7
                                                     male non-smokers
       60
                                                     male smokers
       40                    64,1
                51,3                    55,7
       20                                                                Age 20-35
        0                                                                X2=52.4, p=0.000
             age 20-35   age 35-50   age >50
                                                                         Age 35-50
                                                                         X2=1023, p=0.000
            % smoking and non-smoking in females in the 3 main
                              age groups
                                                                         Age >50
                                                                         X2=520, p=0.000
      100
      80        62,8         65,6
                                       87,8         female non-smokers
      60
                                                    female smokers
      40
      20        37,2         34,4
                                       12,2
       0
            age 20-35    age 35-50   age >50



1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
11
   Waist circumference and BMI in male and
      female smokers and non-smokers
      (statistically significant difference)

                  Smokers         Non-smokers              p

         Waist    95.65±
                       15.63         94.66±
                                          15.84           0.000
Male
         BMI      27.38±
                       4.75          27.23±
                                          4.92            0.037


         Waist    84.63±
                       13.89         85.85±
                                          14.79           0.000
Female
         BMI      25.42±
                       5.02          25.87±
                                          5.28            0.000




 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
Males: Waist circumference in smokers and non-
                          smokers
                                                 12
      in the 3 different age groups (non-significant
                         difference)
                                          NS             NS




                                         }

                                                        }
                  98                  96,45           96,74
                                                              96,13
                                              95,79
                  96

                  94

                  92      NS




                         }
       Waist
                  90
  circumference        87,66
                               86,9                                   Smokers
                  88                                                  Non-smokers

                  86

                  84

                  82

                  80
                       20-35          35-50            >50
                                      Age groups




1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
13
              Males: BMI in smokers and non-smokers
                    in the 3 different age groups
                     (non-significant difference)

                                       NS               NS




                                                       }
                                      }
              28                   27,58    27,54   27,66   27,61


              27

                       NS
              26

                     }
       BM I        25,27
                           25,17
                                                                    Smokers
              25                                                    Non-smokers


              24


              23
                    20-35           35-50             >50
                                   Age groups



1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
Females : Waist circumference in smokers and non-
                                                                   14
                           smokers
  in the 3 different age groups (non-significant difference)
                                                        NS




                                                       }
                                                     94,69 94,71
                  96
                  94
                  92
                  90                       NS




                                          }
                  88       NS          85,03 84,97
         Waist    86



                         }
    circumference 84   81,76   82,11                                    Smokers
                  82                                                    Non-smokers
                  80
                  78
                  76
                  74
                       20-35            35-50         >50
                                       Age groups




1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
15
         Females: BMI in smokers and non-smokers
                in the 3 different age groups
                (non-significant difference)
                                                 NS




                                               }
         30                                  28,94   28,75


         28                        NS




                                 }
                  NS           25,66 25,69
         26
                }
   BMI                24,41
              24,13
                                                             Smokers
         24                                                  Non-smokers

         22


         20
               20-35           35-50          >50
                              Age groups



1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
16
   Multiple regression analysis in males
  Dependent variable=    BMI
  Independent variables= age, walking habits, marital status, smoking


                                 beta      p

       Age                       0.016     0.166


       Walking habits            -0.021    0.061


       Marital status            0.124     0.000


       Smoking habits            0.004     0.716


                (F=32.563, sig=0.000)
1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
17
  Multiple regression analysis in females
  Dependent variable=    BMI
  Independent variables= age, walking habits, marital status, smoking

                                   beta p

          Age                      0.255    0.000


          Walking habits           0.020    0.058


          Marital status           0.028    0.007


          Smoking habits           0.001    0.898


                 (F=150.8, sig=0.000)

1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
18
   Multiple regression analysis in males
  Dependent variable=     Waist circumference
  Independent variables= age, BMI, walking habits, marital status,
                         smoking

                                    beta      p
          Age                       0.014     0.199

          BMI                       0.510     0.000

          Walking habits            - 0.015   0.143

          Marital status            0.081     0.000

          Smoking habits            0.015     0.150

                 (F=515.162, sig=0.000)
1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
19
  Multiple regression analysis in females
  Dependent variable=     Waist circumference
  Independent variables= age, BMI, walking habits, marital status,
                         smoking

                                  beta       p
       Age                         0.112      0.000

       BMI                         0.592      0.000

       Walking habits              -0.200     0.023

       Marital status              -0.003     0.750

       Smoking habits              0.005      0.608

                 (F=1021.658, sig=0.000)
1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
20
 Multiple regression analysis in male smokers
  Dependent variable=     BMI
  Independent variables= age, cigarettes/day, walking habits,
                         marital status

                                 beta       p

        Age                      0.079      0.000


        Cigarettes/day           0.011      0.435


        Walking habits           -0.033     0.025


        Marital status           0.078      0.000


                 (F=22.257, sig=0.000)
1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
21
Multiple regression analysis in males smokers
  Dependent variable=     Waist circumference
  Independent variables= age, BMI, cigarettes/day, walking habits,
                         marital status

                               beta          p
      Age                       0.039         0.008

      BMI                       0.497         0.000

      Cigarettes/day            0.038         0.004

      Walking habits            -0.017        0.216

      Marital status            0.050         0.001

                (F=294.101, sig=0.000)
1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
22
Multiple regression analysis in female smokers
  Dependent variable=     BMI
  Independent variables= age, cigarettes/day, walking habits,
                         marital status

                                  beta      p

         Age                      0.201     0.000


         Cigarettes/day           0.014     0.463


         Walking habits           0.027     0.144


         Marital status           0.018     0.339


                  (F=32.347, sig=0.000)
1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
23
Multiple regression analysis in female smokers
  Dependent variable=     Waist circumference
  Independent variables= age, BMI, cigarettes/day, walking habits,
                         marital status

                                beta        p
        Age                     0.073       0.000

        BMI                     0.614       0.000

        Cigarettes/day          0.004       0.795

        Walking habits          0.004       0.799

        Marital status          -0.013      0.423

                 (F=334.007, sig=0.000)
1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
24
                  Conclusions
• Greek males are greater smokers than
  females on the whole and in the three main
  age groups.
• Contrary to general belief, smoking habits are
  not correlated to obesity indices, with the
  exception of waist circumference in male
  smokers which seems to be related to the
  number of cigarettes smoked per day.
• Age is a confounding factor when
  estimating the relationship between obesity
  indices and smoking habits: Males of the
  middle age, who happen to be greater
  smokers, are more obese, while younger
  women, who happen to be thinner, are the
  ones that smoke more.
1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
25
                  Discussion (a)
      A widely held but poorly documented view is that
       tobacco smoking may reduce body weight and certain
       obesity indicators:

•      Animal studies have shown that nicotine decreases
       appetite and energy intake
•      However, epidemiological studies in adults have shown
       that the habitual intake of smokers is equal to or
       greater than nonsmokers and that the diet of smokers
       is more energy dense than that of nonsmokers.
•      Concerning energy expenditure, cigarette smoking
       increases Resting Metabolic Rate: Nicotine
       increases sympathetic nervous system activity and
       increases thermogenesis in adipose tissue, at least in
       rodent studies.



    1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
26
                  Discussion (b)
    Different studies on the relationship between smoking
     habits and obesity come to conflicting results, mainly
     because of the many confounding factors: alcohol
     consumption (that usually goes with heavy smoking),
     socioeconomic status, psychological profil, age, initial
     reason for taking up smoking, health problems that lead
     to restraining from smoking etc.
    However, the most common finding is that smokers
     are leaner than nonsmokers, but among smokers,
     smoking intensity is positively related to obesity,
     mainly of central distribution.
    According to our results, smoking habits are not in
     any way correlated to obesity indices with the
     exception of waist circumference in male smokers,
     which seems to be related to the number of
     cigarettes smoked per day.

    1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
27




1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Greek Smoking and Obesity Survey

Body Mass Index of Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphobl...
Body Mass Index of Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphobl...Body Mass Index of Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphobl...
Body Mass Index of Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphobl...dylanturner22
 
2008 16th eco
2008 16th eco2008 16th eco
2008 16th ecoiosis1979
 
Year-by-year trend analysis in modifiable risk factors reduction
Year-by-year trend analysis in modifiable risk factors reductionYear-by-year trend analysis in modifiable risk factors reduction
Year-by-year trend analysis in modifiable risk factors reductionAbd Alrahman Kfmc
 
Ondeck peters exhausts_final
Ondeck peters exhausts_finalOndeck peters exhausts_final
Ondeck peters exhausts_finalCheryl Peters
 
Body mass dependent differences in functional connectivity
Body mass dependent differences in functional connectivityBody mass dependent differences in functional connectivity
Body mass dependent differences in functional connectivityJenniferSadler9
 
Affect of Metabolic Obesity and Body Mass Index in Coronary Artery Diseases
Affect of Metabolic Obesity and Body Mass Index in Coronary Artery DiseasesAffect of Metabolic Obesity and Body Mass Index in Coronary Artery Diseases
Affect of Metabolic Obesity and Body Mass Index in Coronary Artery DiseasesNikhil Gupta
 
Nutritional status and effect of exercise in young women
Nutritional status and effect of exercise in young womenNutritional status and effect of exercise in young women
Nutritional status and effect of exercise in young womenDr. BMN college of Home Science
 
6. le tan phung
6. le tan phung6. le tan phung
6. le tan phungBinhThang
 
The Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Visceral Fat on Insulin Resistance
The Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Visceral Fat on Insulin ResistanceThe Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Visceral Fat on Insulin Resistance
The Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Visceral Fat on Insulin ResistanceBiomedical Statistical Consulting
 
9002604 consumer-awareness
9002604 consumer-awareness9002604 consumer-awareness
9002604 consumer-awarenessMaruthi Prasad
 
Knowledge, attitude and practice about hypertension among adult
Knowledge, attitude and practice about hypertension among adultKnowledge, attitude and practice about hypertension among adult
Knowledge, attitude and practice about hypertension among adultMd.Nahian Rahman
 

Similar a Greek Smoking and Obesity Survey (20)

Body Mass Index of Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphobl...
Body Mass Index of Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphobl...Body Mass Index of Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphobl...
Body Mass Index of Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphobl...
 
2008 16th eco
2008 16th eco2008 16th eco
2008 16th eco
 
Year-by-year trend analysis in modifiable risk factors reduction
Year-by-year trend analysis in modifiable risk factors reductionYear-by-year trend analysis in modifiable risk factors reduction
Year-by-year trend analysis in modifiable risk factors reduction
 
Ondeck peters exhausts_final
Ondeck peters exhausts_finalOndeck peters exhausts_final
Ondeck peters exhausts_final
 
Current Modalities in the Treatment of Lung Cancer
Current Modalities in the Treatment of Lung CancerCurrent Modalities in the Treatment of Lung Cancer
Current Modalities in the Treatment of Lung Cancer
 
Body mass dependent differences in functional connectivity
Body mass dependent differences in functional connectivityBody mass dependent differences in functional connectivity
Body mass dependent differences in functional connectivity
 
Cancer detection
Cancer detectionCancer detection
Cancer detection
 
Affect of Metabolic Obesity and Body Mass Index in Coronary Artery Diseases
Affect of Metabolic Obesity and Body Mass Index in Coronary Artery DiseasesAffect of Metabolic Obesity and Body Mass Index in Coronary Artery Diseases
Affect of Metabolic Obesity and Body Mass Index in Coronary Artery Diseases
 
4T-tests.pptx
4T-tests.pptx4T-tests.pptx
4T-tests.pptx
 
THE EFFECTS OF CIGARETTE SMOKING ON SEMEN QUALITY OF INFERTILE AND FERTILE ME...
THE EFFECTS OF CIGARETTE SMOKING ON SEMEN QUALITY OF INFERTILE AND FERTILE ME...THE EFFECTS OF CIGARETTE SMOKING ON SEMEN QUALITY OF INFERTILE AND FERTILE ME...
THE EFFECTS OF CIGARETTE SMOKING ON SEMEN QUALITY OF INFERTILE AND FERTILE ME...
 
Nutritional status and effect of exercise in young women
Nutritional status and effect of exercise in young womenNutritional status and effect of exercise in young women
Nutritional status and effect of exercise in young women
 
seminar LCS.pptx
seminar LCS.pptxseminar LCS.pptx
seminar LCS.pptx
 
6. le tan phung
6. le tan phung6. le tan phung
6. le tan phung
 
Impact of hiv aids training prog [compatibility mode]
Impact of hiv aids training prog [compatibility mode]Impact of hiv aids training prog [compatibility mode]
Impact of hiv aids training prog [compatibility mode]
 
The Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Visceral Fat on Insulin Resistance
The Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Visceral Fat on Insulin ResistanceThe Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Visceral Fat on Insulin Resistance
The Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Visceral Fat on Insulin Resistance
 
9002604 consumer-awareness
9002604 consumer-awareness9002604 consumer-awareness
9002604 consumer-awareness
 
Thyroid paper
Thyroid paperThyroid paper
Thyroid paper
 
Knowledge, attitude and practice about hypertension among adult
Knowledge, attitude and practice about hypertension among adultKnowledge, attitude and practice about hypertension among adult
Knowledge, attitude and practice about hypertension among adult
 
Rsna van colen breast density
Rsna van colen breast densityRsna van colen breast density
Rsna van colen breast density
 
Renehan opac2013
Renehan opac2013Renehan opac2013
Renehan opac2013
 

Más de iosis1979

2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικόiosis1979
 
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίαςiosis1979
 
2007 15th eco
2007 15th eco2007 15th eco
2007 15th ecoiosis1979
 
2006 14th ico 2
2006 14th ico 22006 14th ico 2
2006 14th ico 2iosis1979
 
2006 14th ico 1
2006 14th ico 12006 14th ico 1
2006 14th ico 1iosis1979
 
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
2006 6o παχυσαρκίαςiosis1979
 
2005 14th eco3
2005 14th eco32005 14th eco3
2005 14th eco3iosis1979
 
2005 14th eco2
2005 14th eco22005 14th eco2
2005 14th eco2iosis1979
 
2004 13th eco
2004 13th eco2004 13th eco
2004 13th ecoiosis1979
 
2003 18th idf
2003 18th idf2003 18th idf
2003 18th idfiosis1979
 
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας21999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2iosis1979
 
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας11999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1iosis1979
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας31999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3iosis1979
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας21999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2iosis1979
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας11999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1iosis1979
 
1998 ιco 8th
1998 ιco 8th1998 ιco 8th
1998 ιco 8thiosis1979
 
1998 8th ico
1998 8th ico1998 8th ico
1998 8th icoiosis1979
 
1997 bile.8th eco
1997 bile.8th eco1997 bile.8th eco
1997 bile.8th ecoiosis1979
 
1997 alcohol 8th eco
1997 alcohol 8th eco1997 alcohol 8th eco
1997 alcohol 8th ecoiosis1979
 

Más de iosis1979 (20)

Easd 2007
Easd 2007Easd 2007
Easd 2007
 
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
 
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
 
2007 15th eco
2007 15th eco2007 15th eco
2007 15th eco
 
2006 14th ico 2
2006 14th ico 22006 14th ico 2
2006 14th ico 2
 
2006 14th ico 1
2006 14th ico 12006 14th ico 1
2006 14th ico 1
 
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
 
2005 14th eco3
2005 14th eco32005 14th eco3
2005 14th eco3
 
2005 14th eco2
2005 14th eco22005 14th eco2
2005 14th eco2
 
2004 13th eco
2004 13th eco2004 13th eco
2004 13th eco
 
2003 18th idf
2003 18th idf2003 18th idf
2003 18th idf
 
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας21999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
 
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας11999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας31999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας21999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας11999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
 
1998 ιco 8th
1998 ιco 8th1998 ιco 8th
1998 ιco 8th
 
1998 8th ico
1998 8th ico1998 8th ico
1998 8th ico
 
1997 bile.8th eco
1997 bile.8th eco1997 bile.8th eco
1997 bile.8th eco
 
1997 alcohol 8th eco
1997 alcohol 8th eco1997 alcohol 8th eco
1997 alcohol 8th eco
 

Greek Smoking and Obesity Survey

  • 1. 1 Smoking habits in Greek adults and their relation to body weight. (Data from first national epidemiological large scale survey on the prevalence of obesity in Greece) E. Chala, I. Kaklamanos, I. Ioannides, T. Tzotzas, M. Kaklamanou and E. Kapantais Hellenic Medical Association for Obesity (HMAO), Athens, Greece. 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 2. 2 The present study is part of a nationwide, cross-sectional epidemiological study conducted from February 2003 to June 2003. This study was designed to estimate obesity prevalence in Greek children and adults and to identify factors associated with obesity indices. One such factor is smoking habits . 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 3. 3 Subjects and Methods (a) • Sample selection: Data were collected by a questionnaire from all members of households, through their children aged 13-19 years, who had direct measurements at the secondary schools. The method used for school selection was that of proportionate stratified random sampling. • Procedure: Gym instructors were trained on anthropometric techniques in order to help the children taking measurements at school, and explain them how to help their relatives to take the appropriate measurements. 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 4. 4 Subjects and Methods (b) • Questionnaire: Households received a sealed envelope with instructions and with a questionnaire seaking information on factors associated with obesity (socioeconomic status, dietary habits, physical activity status, smoking habits, etc) 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 5. 5 Subjects and Methods (c) Male Female (8090) (9313) age 44.6±10.5 41.5±11.1 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 6. 6 Subjects and Methods (d) • Weight (kg) Calculation of BMI (kg/m2) • Height (m) • Waist circumference(cm) Calculation of WHR • Hip circumference (cm) (waist-to-hip ratio) Statistical analysis used SPSS version 11.5. Results on BMI, WC and WHR were calculated as mean±SD. Comparisons were made by student’s t-test and non-parametric tests. Proportions were compared using the X2 test. Multiple regression analysis was applied to estimate the contribution of various factors on the prediction of obesity indices. 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 7. 7 WHO definitions for BMI <18.5: underweight 18.5-24.9: normal weight 25.0-29.9: overweight >30.0: obese >40.0: morbidly obese 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 8. 8 Cut-off points of Waist Circumference <94cm: low risk 94-102cm: increased risk For men >102cm: substancially increased risk <80cm: low risk For 80-88cm: increased risk women >88cm: substancially increased risk 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 9. 9 Results % smoking and non-smoking in males and females 100 39,1 80 67,5 non-smokers 60 smokers 40 60,9 32,5 20 0 males (8090) females (9313) X2=1409.4, p=0.000 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 10. % smoking and non-smoking in males in the 3 main 10 age groups 100 35,9 44,3 80 48,7 male non-smokers 60 male smokers 40 64,1 51,3 55,7 20 Age 20-35 0 X2=52.4, p=0.000 age 20-35 age 35-50 age >50 Age 35-50 X2=1023, p=0.000 % smoking and non-smoking in females in the 3 main age groups Age >50 X2=520, p=0.000 100 80 62,8 65,6 87,8 female non-smokers 60 female smokers 40 20 37,2 34,4 12,2 0 age 20-35 age 35-50 age >50 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 11. 11 Waist circumference and BMI in male and female smokers and non-smokers (statistically significant difference) Smokers Non-smokers p Waist 95.65± 15.63 94.66± 15.84 0.000 Male BMI 27.38± 4.75 27.23± 4.92 0.037 Waist 84.63± 13.89 85.85± 14.79 0.000 Female BMI 25.42± 5.02 25.87± 5.28 0.000 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 12. Males: Waist circumference in smokers and non- smokers 12 in the 3 different age groups (non-significant difference) NS NS } } 98 96,45 96,74 96,13 95,79 96 94 92 NS } Waist 90 circumference 87,66 86,9 Smokers 88 Non-smokers 86 84 82 80 20-35 35-50 >50 Age groups 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 13. 13 Males: BMI in smokers and non-smokers in the 3 different age groups (non-significant difference) NS NS } } 28 27,58 27,54 27,66 27,61 27 NS 26 } BM I 25,27 25,17 Smokers 25 Non-smokers 24 23 20-35 35-50 >50 Age groups 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 14. Females : Waist circumference in smokers and non- 14 smokers in the 3 different age groups (non-significant difference) NS } 94,69 94,71 96 94 92 90 NS } 88 NS 85,03 84,97 Waist 86 } circumference 84 81,76 82,11 Smokers 82 Non-smokers 80 78 76 74 20-35 35-50 >50 Age groups 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 15. 15 Females: BMI in smokers and non-smokers in the 3 different age groups (non-significant difference) NS } 30 28,94 28,75 28 NS } NS 25,66 25,69 26 } BMI 24,41 24,13 Smokers 24 Non-smokers 22 20 20-35 35-50 >50 Age groups 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 16. 16 Multiple regression analysis in males Dependent variable= BMI Independent variables= age, walking habits, marital status, smoking beta p Age 0.016 0.166 Walking habits -0.021 0.061 Marital status 0.124 0.000 Smoking habits 0.004 0.716 (F=32.563, sig=0.000) 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 17. 17 Multiple regression analysis in females Dependent variable= BMI Independent variables= age, walking habits, marital status, smoking beta p Age 0.255 0.000 Walking habits 0.020 0.058 Marital status 0.028 0.007 Smoking habits 0.001 0.898 (F=150.8, sig=0.000) 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 18. 18 Multiple regression analysis in males Dependent variable= Waist circumference Independent variables= age, BMI, walking habits, marital status, smoking beta p Age 0.014 0.199 BMI 0.510 0.000 Walking habits - 0.015 0.143 Marital status 0.081 0.000 Smoking habits 0.015 0.150 (F=515.162, sig=0.000) 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 19. 19 Multiple regression analysis in females Dependent variable= Waist circumference Independent variables= age, BMI, walking habits, marital status, smoking beta p Age 0.112 0.000 BMI 0.592 0.000 Walking habits -0.200 0.023 Marital status -0.003 0.750 Smoking habits 0.005 0.608 (F=1021.658, sig=0.000) 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 20. 20 Multiple regression analysis in male smokers Dependent variable= BMI Independent variables= age, cigarettes/day, walking habits, marital status beta p Age 0.079 0.000 Cigarettes/day 0.011 0.435 Walking habits -0.033 0.025 Marital status 0.078 0.000 (F=22.257, sig=0.000) 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 21. 21 Multiple regression analysis in males smokers Dependent variable= Waist circumference Independent variables= age, BMI, cigarettes/day, walking habits, marital status beta p Age 0.039 0.008 BMI 0.497 0.000 Cigarettes/day 0.038 0.004 Walking habits -0.017 0.216 Marital status 0.050 0.001 (F=294.101, sig=0.000) 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 22. 22 Multiple regression analysis in female smokers Dependent variable= BMI Independent variables= age, cigarettes/day, walking habits, marital status beta p Age 0.201 0.000 Cigarettes/day 0.014 0.463 Walking habits 0.027 0.144 Marital status 0.018 0.339 (F=32.347, sig=0.000) 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 23. 23 Multiple regression analysis in female smokers Dependent variable= Waist circumference Independent variables= age, BMI, cigarettes/day, walking habits, marital status beta p Age 0.073 0.000 BMI 0.614 0.000 Cigarettes/day 0.004 0.795 Walking habits 0.004 0.799 Marital status -0.013 0.423 (F=334.007, sig=0.000) 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 24. 24 Conclusions • Greek males are greater smokers than females on the whole and in the three main age groups. • Contrary to general belief, smoking habits are not correlated to obesity indices, with the exception of waist circumference in male smokers which seems to be related to the number of cigarettes smoked per day. • Age is a confounding factor when estimating the relationship between obesity indices and smoking habits: Males of the middle age, who happen to be greater smokers, are more obese, while younger women, who happen to be thinner, are the ones that smoke more. 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 25. 25 Discussion (a)  A widely held but poorly documented view is that tobacco smoking may reduce body weight and certain obesity indicators: • Animal studies have shown that nicotine decreases appetite and energy intake • However, epidemiological studies in adults have shown that the habitual intake of smokers is equal to or greater than nonsmokers and that the diet of smokers is more energy dense than that of nonsmokers. • Concerning energy expenditure, cigarette smoking increases Resting Metabolic Rate: Nicotine increases sympathetic nervous system activity and increases thermogenesis in adipose tissue, at least in rodent studies. 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 26. 26 Discussion (b)  Different studies on the relationship between smoking habits and obesity come to conflicting results, mainly because of the many confounding factors: alcohol consumption (that usually goes with heavy smoking), socioeconomic status, psychological profil, age, initial reason for taking up smoking, health problems that lead to restraining from smoking etc.  However, the most common finding is that smokers are leaner than nonsmokers, but among smokers, smoking intensity is positively related to obesity, mainly of central distribution.  According to our results, smoking habits are not in any way correlated to obesity indices with the exception of waist circumference in male smokers, which seems to be related to the number of cigarettes smoked per day. 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the
  • 27. 27 1st National Epidemiological Large Scale Survey on the