TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
Monitoring and Assessment of Impact
1. Monitoring and Assessment
of Impact of
Nutrient Management
Measures
Dr. Antanas Sigitas ŠILEIKA
Water Management Institute
Sigitas@water.omnitel.net
2004 09 14
2. The problem
Status Report on Implementation
of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration
reveled that non of the HELCOM
Contracting Parties had achieved
the overall N and P load reduction
target of 50 % to the Baltic Sea
3. Nutrient load to the Baltic Sea
N, tons P, tons
Country 1990 1995 1990 1995
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Germany
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Russia
Sweden
83,000
59,000
72,000
14,000
94,000
19,000
120,000
81,000
119,000
68,700
46,500
66,000
21,400
91,000
36,800
214,800
84,600
130,900
5,300
2,800
3,400
1,200
3,200
1,700
15,000
9,500
4,000
2,600
1,300
3,600
0,600
2,200
1,400
14,200
7,100
4,700
N load has
increased
100,000 tons
TOTAL 661,000 760,700 46,100 37,700
4. Nutrient load to the Baltic Sea from the
r. Nemunas in Lithuania
NO3-N load
Year NH4-N, t NO3-N, t PO4-P, t
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
has
3,736
7,144
5,273
4,727
7,980
6,654
5,727
1,078
1,664
14,978
15,131
14,727
27,596
32,753
23,193
39,661
27,205
37,383
5,845
1,780
2,972
1,561
1,723
0,979
1,128
0,592
1,076
increased
2.5 times
Source: Monitoring annals of the Lithuanian Joint Research Centre. Calculation for the Nemunas basin from Smalininkai post
5. Nitrogen load from agriculture in rivers of
Finland, Germany, Denmark and Lithuania
Source: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry (BERNET Report), 2000
Monitoring data of the Lithuanian Joint Research Centre
20
15
10
5
0
Ostrobothnia
(Finland)
Schleswig-
Holstein
(Germany)
Fyn County
(Denmark)
Nemunas
basin
(Lithuania)
Ni trogen load kgha-1 year
N leaching from
Nemunas basin 6
times less than
from Denmark
10. Nutrient concentration in rivers
Phosphorus concentration dropped
down below eutrophication level 0,05
mg/l;
Ammonium nitrogen concentration now
is below permitted limit 0,39 mg/l;
Meantime concentration of nitrate
nitrogen increased and still is higher
than before 1990 in agricultural rivers.
11. N cycle in watershed
Rainfall
Fodder
Emission
Fertilizers
N
fixation
Food
Leaching
Runoff
12. Monitoring and Assessment Method
1. Demonstration watersheds in the areas
vulnerable to nitrate pollution and built
on previous BAAP and other works;
2. Topography, soils characteristics and
land use GIS data base in watersheds;
3. Advanced manure handling in animal
farm and nutrients balance on fields
and farms;
4. Monitoring of agricultural runoff,
precipitation, water quality in dug wells.
13. Characteristics of
demonstration watersheds
Watershed Total
area, km2
Arable,
%
Pasture,
%
Forest,
%
Graisupis 14.1 48.1 24.1 27.8
Vardas 7.5 32.2 44.8 23.0
Lyzena 1.83 23.3 74.3 2.4
Bariunai 0.24 Farm
Yard
0.1 0
14. Kaliningrad district
Poland
Belorussia
L a t v I a
Baltic Sea
Minija
Jūra
Venta
Tatula
Šiauliai
Panevėžys
Klaipėda
Kaunas
Vilnius
Lėvuo
Vyžuona
Mūša
Mūša
Šventoji
Žeimena
Neris
Mūša
Nevėžis
Nemunas
Nemunas
Nemunas
Šešupė
Nemunas basin
Lielupė basin
Venta basin
Baltic sea basin
Vardas
Bariūnai
Graisupis
Lyžena
Location of
Monitoring
Watersheds
15. Watersheds
150
148
138
#
152
154
142
146
136
140
144
142
134
154
158
160
154
152
144
132
140
130
164
170
128
172
146
132
150
158
162
146
150
132
162
144
142
154
134
134
150
142
146
142
136
154
154
153
156
146
144
N
Monitoring
post
Lyžena
Lyžena
#
Valučiai
Dem. farm
N
Monitoring
post
Graisupis
Graisupis
Graisupis
N
#
+
Monitoring post
Dem. farm
Graisupis
post
Vardas
post
Lyzena
post
18. Monitoring methods
Thompson weirs are used for flow
measurements in streams. Water level is
registered automatically by limnigraphs;
The river water samples are taken manually
every day. Joint weekly samples are analysed
in spring and joint monthly sample at another
time of the year;
The concentration of nutrients and average
monthly values of the river water flow are used
for calculation of nutrient losses;
Tipping buckets are used for drainage flow
measurements.
19. NO3-N load from watershed, kg ha yr-1
1997 1998 1999 Total AVG
r. Graisupis 11.6 17.6 6.9 36.1 12.0
Ditch 13.4 19.2 14.9 46.8 15.6
Crop 16.1 22.8 11.5 50.8 16.8
Pasture 6.7 5.3 4.4 16.4 5.5
Rainfall 4.9 1.9 5.23 12.4 4.0
Largest load
from crop
20. NO3-N concentration in r. Nevezis
(upstream Kedainiai) and Graisupis
20
15
10
5
0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Concentration, mgl-1l
Nevezis Graisupis
21. Nutrient retention
25
20
15
10
5
0
Load kg ha-1
1997 1998 1999 AVG
Load
from crop
Load
in stream
Load
in ditch
Load
in river
22. Assessment of watersheds monitoring
The highest N losses (15.3 kg N ha-1) determines more
intensive agricultural activity in Graisupis (71.5 kg N
ha-1 of fertilisers; 54% of arable land; 0.87 LU ha-1);
Close to the sea (Lyzena) are bigger water discharges
in winter but due to low N content in soil (32.9 kg N ha-1
of fertilisers, 74% of grassland) the annual N losses are
very small (5.7 kg N ha-1);
The highest P losses (0.318 kg P ha-1) determine
Vardas hilly relief and clay soil;
Bigger specific water runoff (0.08 l s-1 ha-1) and light
soils (sandy loam) determine comparatively high N
losses (11.9 kg N ha-1) despite low farming activity
(39.4 kg N ha-1 of fertilisers, 45% of grassland) in
Vardas watershed.
24. N and P input in soil of dem. farm
N P
Input, kg ha-1
1995 1999 2001 1995 1999 2001
Fertilizers & seeds 41 85 124 30 10 9
Fodder and
7 9 10 2 2 6
animals
Deposition &
fixation
4 17.6 13 0 0.5 0
Manure 7 10 14
Total I 59 122 160 32 13 15
25. N and P output from soil, kg ha-1
1995 1999 2001 1995 1999 2001
Crop yield 80 123 74 13 24 16
NH3 evaporation 7 50
Leaching 38 30 23
Denitrification 38 30 16
Total II 163 237 113 13 24 16
Total I-Total II (x) -102 -111 +46 +20 -10 -4
Deficit Oversupply
Residues (y) 34 43 32 6 14 7
x–y =deficit/oversupply -136 -154 +14 +14 -24 -11
26. Kėdainiai 7
Krakės
11.52 ha
3 8 1
9 5
6
2
V
16.33 ha
IV
8.16 ha
II
VI
6.36 ha
I
6.65 ha
G-1
Graisupis
G-1
Monitoring
post
57
56.5
III
12.5 ha
Field Trials
27. N leaching dependence on crop
Perennial
grass
Spring
cereal
Winter
cereal
Row
crops
The least leaching
is from perennial
pastures
The highest leaching is
from row crops
28. Grassland management and NO3- N
leaching to drainage, kg ha-1
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Cut
Ploughed
After
ploughing
Before
ploughing
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
30. Nutrients in milk production
Feed
135 kgN;17 kgP; 105 kgK
Milk
27 kgN; 5 kgP; 7 kgK
Offspring and weight gain
2 kgN; 0,5 kgP; 0,1 kgK
Litter
5 kgN; 0,5 kgP; 6,0 kgK
Manure and slurry
111 kgN; 12 kgP; 104 kgK
5000 kg
111 kgN, 12 kgP and
104 kgK
produce one cow per
year
31. Lithuanian obligations to EU
To establish manure storages on large
farms with more than 300 AU as well as
on newly established farms having over
150 AU within a 4-year period after
entering the EU
All the rest farms with more than 10 AU
endangering the environment with
nitrates will also have to reconstruct
their barns later.
32. Monitoring post
Barn
watershed
N
+ Coordinate
Manure storage
Monitoring post
Road
Basin
Barn
Manure storage
Collector
Drain
Contourline
70 0 70 140 Meters
#
6 236 400
+480 000
46
45
45.5
47 46.5
44.5
46
44.5
45
45
45
45
45
46
45
46.5
44.5
2
1
Pasture
#
Ground water piezometer
Cow barn
38. Total N concentration in drainage water from the
territory of barns
25
20
15
10
5
0
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Concentration, mgN l-1
102 39
Permitted limit
12mgN/l
Before
construction
Filling
Full pit
39. Total P concentration in drainage water from the
territory of barns
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Concentration micro g l-1
7600 8100 5800
Permitted limit
1500 micro gP/l
Filling
Full pit
Before
construction
40. Manure storage capacity and
financing need for farms > 10 AU
Number of farms – Ctl 1450 and Pig 49
Manure pads need – Ctl 446.5 thou m2
Slurry reservoirs need – Ctl 472.7 thou
m3 and Pig 39.8 thou m3
Manure pads construction cost– Ctl 22.5
M EUR
Slurry reservoirs cost – Ctl 50.8 M EUR
and Pig 4.6 M EUR
Total cost – 78.0 M EUR
41. NO3-N concentration in 5775 dug wells
10.0
5.0
0
Mai 124 mgN/l
Mediana 8.7 MgN/l
>10 mgN/l
Max 124 mgN/l
Median 8.7 MgN/l
42. Water improvement in dug well
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
NO3-N concentration, mg/l
Well water
Permitted
limit
Permitted
limit