3. General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade (GATT)
Outcome of the failure of negotiating governments to
create the International Trade Organization (ITO)
Negotiated during the UN Conference on Trade and
Employment
Formed in 1947 and transformed to World Trade
Organization (WTO) in 1995
3
4. Part of economic recovery after World War II, Bretton
Woods Conference suggested an organization to
regulate trade
Parallel to the Governments negotiating the ITO, 15
negotiating states began negotiating for the GATT as a
way to attain early tariff reductions
The ITO failed in 1950 and then GATT agreement was
introduced
4
5. GATT's main objective
Reduction of barriers to international trade
Achieved through reduction of tariff
barriers, quantitative restrictions and subsidies on trade
through a series of agreements
It was a treaty, not an organization
A small secretariat occupied what is today the Centre
William Rappard in Geneva, Switzerland
5
6. Inception
Efforts to negotiate international trade agreements began in 1927 at
the League of Nations but were unsuccessful.
Precursor organization to GATT, ITO, was first proposed in
February 1945 by the United Nations Economic and Social Council
(UNESCO).
Owing to the United States failing to implement the ITO, GATT was
the only organization left.
On 1 January, 1948 the agreement was signed by 23 countries:
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Burma, Canada, Ceylon, Chile, Chi
na, Cuba, the Czechoslovak
Republic, France, India, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Netherlands,
New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Southern
Rhodesia, Syria, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the
United States.
According to GATT's own estimates, the negotiations created 123
agreements that covered 45,000 tariff items that related to
approximately one-half of world trade or $10 billion in trade. 6
7. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT) was first signed in 1947.
Was designed
To provide an international forum
That encouraged free trade between member
states
By regulating and reducing tariffs on traded
goods
Providing a common mechanism for resolving
trade disputes.
7
9. TRADE BARRIERS
Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers
While free-trade maximizes world welfare, most
nations impose some trade restrictions that benefit
special groups in the nation. The most important type
of trade restriction historically is the tariff.
This is a tax or duty on the imports or exports.
When a small nation imposes an import tariff, the
domestic price of the importable commodity rises by
the full amount of the tariff for individuals in nation.
As a result, domestic production of the importable
commodity expands while domestic consumption and
imports fall. However, the nation as a whole faces the
unchanged world price since the nation itself collects
the tariff. 9
10. Tariffs
Tariffs can be ad-Valorem, specific, or compound.
Ad-Valorem tariff is expressed as a fixed percentage of
the value of the traded commodity.
Specific tariff is expressed as a fixed sum per physical
unit of the traded commodity.
A compound tariff is a combination of an Ad Valorem
and a specific tariff.
10
11. Trade Restrictions /Trade Barriers
An import tariff is a duty on the imported
commodity, while an export tariff is a duty on the
exported commodity.
Export tariffs are prohibited by the U.S. Constitution but are
often applied by developing countries on their traditional
exports (such as Ghana on it’s cocoa and Brazil on it’s
coffee) to get better prices and revenues.
Developing nations rely heavy on export tariff to raise
revenues because of their ease of collection.
On the other hand, industrial countries invariably impose
tariffs or other trade restrictions to protect some(usually
labor-intensive)industry, while using mostly income taxes
to raise revenues.
11
12. Trade Barriers (Contd)
According to Stolper-Samuelson theorem , an increase in
the relative price of a commodity (for example, as a result of
a tariff ) raises the return or earnings of the factor used
intensively in it’s production.
For example,
if a capital-abundant nation imposes an
import tariff on the labor intensive commodity, wages
in the nation will rise.
However, since the nation’s benefit comes at the expense of
other nations, latter are likely to retaliate, so that in the end
all nations usually lose.
12
13. Trade Barriers (Contd)
Two arguments are that protection is needed to reduce domestic
unemployment and a deficit balance of payments.
A more valid argument for protection is the infant-industry
argument.
However, what trade protection can do, direct subsidies and
taxes can do better in overcoming purely domestic
distortions.The same is true for industries important for national
defense.The closest we come to a valid economic argument for
protection is the optimal tariff (which,however, invites
retaliation).
Trade protection in the United States is usually given to low-
wage workers and to large, well organized industries producing
producing consumer products.
13
14. Non-Tariff Barriers
International trade also hampered by numerous
Technical, administrative, and other regulations.
These include safety regulations for automobile and
electrical equipment, health regulations for the
hygienic
Production and packaging of imported food
products, and labeling requirements showing
origin and contents.
14
15. Non Tariff Barrier [Subsidies]
National government sometimes grant subsidies to
domestic producers to help improve their trade position.
Such devices are indirect form of protection provided to
domestic businesses, whether they may be import
competing producers or exporters.
Two types of subsidies can be distinguished: a domestic
subsidy , which is sometimes granted to producers of
import-competing goods,and an export subsidy, which
goes to producers of goods that are to be sold overseas.
15
16. Other Non Tariff Barriers
Government Procurement Policies: Because government
agencies are large buyers of goods and services, they are
attractive customers for foreign suppliers. Most
governments however, favor domestic suppliers over
foreign ones in the procurement materials and products.
E.g, Government often extend preferences to domestic
suppliers in the form of buy-national policies campaigns.
16
17. Impact of trade barriers
Advanced industrial nations committed themselves after
World War II to removing barriers to the free flow of
goods, services,and capital between nations
This goal was enshrined in the General Agreement on Trade and
Tariffs [GATT]
Under the umbrella of GATT, eight rounds of negotiations
among member states(now numbering 146) have worked to
lower barriers to the free flow of goods and services
The most recent round of negotiations, known as the Uruguay
Round, was completed in Dec,1993.The Uruguay round further
reduced trade barriers; extended GATT to cover services as well
as manufactured goods; provided enhanced protection for
patents, trademarks, and copyrights; and established the World
Trade Organization (WTO)to police the international trading
system
17
18. Impact of trade barriers
In the late 2001, the WTO launched a new round of talks
[Doha,Qatar] aimed at further liberalizing the global trade
and investment framework.
The agenda included cutting tariffs on industrial
goods, services,and agricultural products; phasing out
subsidies to agricultural producers; reducing barriers to
cross border investments; and limiting the antidumping
laws.
The rich nations spend around $300 billion a year in
subsidies to support their farm sectors. The worlds poorer
nations have the most to gain from any reductions in
agricultural tariffs and subsidies.
18
20. Successes
Continual reductions in tariffs helped spur very
high rates of world trade growth during the 1950s
and 1960s — around 8% a year on average
Trade growth consistently out-paced production
growth
The rush of new members during the Uruguay
Round demonstrated recognition of multilateral
trading system as the anchor for development and
an instrument of economic and trade reform.
20
22. GATT’s success in reducing tariffs to a low level, with a
series of economic recessions 1970-80’s drove
governments to devise other forms of protection for
sectors facing increased foreign competition
High rates of unemployment and constant factory
closures led governments in Western Europe and North
America to seek bilateral market-sharing arrangements
with competitors and to embark on a subsidies race to
maintain their holds on agricultural trade
Both these changes undermined GATT’s credibility and
effectiveness.
22
23. The problem was not just a deteriorating trade
policy environment.
By the early 1980s the General Agreement was
clearly no longer as relevant to the realities of world
trade as it had been in the 1940s
World trade had become far more complex and
important than 40 years before
The globalization of the world economy was
underway
Trade in services — not covered by GATT rules
Ever increasing international investments
23
24. Factors convinced GATT members that a new effort
to reinforce and extend the multilateral system
should be attempted.
That effort resulted in the Uruguay Round, the
Marrakesh Declaration, and the creation of the
WTO.
24
28. World Trade Organization
Location :- Geneva, Switzerland
Established: 1 January 1995
Created by : Uruguay Round negotiations (1986-94)
Membership :153 countries (on 23 July 2008)
Budget : 185 million Swiss francs for 2008
2007 Secretariat Staff : 625
Head : Director-General, Pascal Lamy
28
29. Objectives
The WTO reiterates the objectives of GATT .
Raising standard of living and income .
Introduce sustainable development.
Taking positive steps to ensure that developing countries.
29
30. Functions of WTO
Administering and Implementing the multilateral and plurilateral trade agreements.
Acting as a forum for multilateral trade negotiations .
Seeking to resolve trade disputes.
Overseeing national trade policies.
Cooperating with other international institutions.
Maintaining trade related database.
Acting as a watchdog of international trade .
Technical assistance and training for developing countries.
30
31. The WTO Structure
Ministerial conference Director General
Secretariat
Dispute Settlement Body General Council
Trade Policy Review Body
31
32. The WTO Structure
Trade
related
Committee Committee Committee Council for Council for Intellectual
On Budget On T & D On BoP Service Goods Property
Rights
council
32
34. The WTO Principles
Transparency
Environment MFN
Protection Treatment
Competition
On BoP
National
Principles Treatment
Of
Treatment WTO
For LDCs
Rule Based Free
Trading Trade
System Principle
Dismantling
Trade
Barriers
34
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (typically abbreviated GATT) was negotiated during the UN Conference on Trade and Employment and was the outcome of the failure of negotiating governments to create the International Trade Organization (ITO). GATT was formed in 1947 and lasted until 1994, when it was replaced by the World Trade Organization in 1995.
The Bretton Woods Conference had introduced the idea for an organization to regulate trade as part of a larger plan for economic recovery after World War II. As governments negotiated the ITO, 15 negotiating states began parallel negotiations for the GATT as a way to attain early tariff reductions.