SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 53
Descargar para leer sin conexión
LEARNING UNIT OBJECTIVES
   Describe the initiation phase
   Describe reasons for project to take place
   Explain and make use of project estimations
   Explain and make use of project selection techniques: financial and non- financial
   Discuss feasibility in terms of identification and analysis of risk for Project
    Selection Purposes
   Discuss how to obtain financial support for projects
   Describe stakeholder management
   Create a project charter and preliminary scope document
   Describe the kick off meeting
THE INITIATION PHASE

                                Describe


                                               Reasons for
                   Initial
                                                 project to
                  meeting
                                                take place




        Project               Initiation                  Project
        charter                 Phase                   estimations




                                                 Project
                  Financial
                                                selection
                   support
                                               techniques
                              Risk analysis
                                   and
                              identification
YES OR NO
Decline
Poor returns
Limited capacity


Six Reasons for a project to take place
   Business needs
   Market demands
   Customer requests
   Legal requirements
   Technological advances
   Social need
PROJECT ESTIMATIONS
Conceptual Estimate – Best Guess!!!


Page 58 example


Definitive Estimate – Meat on the bone!!!
More research


Page 58 example
PROJECT SELECTION TECHNIQUES - FINANCIAL
Financial selection methods probably most important selection technique.


We will look at three techniques:-


PAYBACK PERIOD
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
NET PRESENT VALUE
FINANCIAL SELECTION TECHNIQUES
METHOD                    OUTCOME                  UNIT OF
                                                   MEASUREMENT
Payback Period            Measures time taken to Years and months
                          breakeven
Return on Investment      Measures rate at which   Percentage
(ROI)                     investment grows
Net Present Value (NPV) Measures overall           Rand
                        present day value of
                        present day and future
                        cashflows
Internal Rate of Return   Growth rate at which     Percentage
(IRR)                     NPV is equal to zero
COMPARISON OF PROJECTS
              PROJECT A                   PROJECT B
Initial investment        R50000   Year        Opening Balance
Return Yr 1               R10000   1           -R70000
Return Yr 2               R10000   2           -R40000
Return Yr 3               R20000   3           R10000
Return Yr 4               R30000   4           R10000
Return Yr 5               R25000   5           R60000
Return Yr 6               R60000   6           R120000
                                   7           R145000
COMPARISON OF PROJECTS
                       PROJECT A                      PROJECT B

Initial                R50000                          R70000
investment
               Opening      Yearly Return     Opening      Yearly Return
               Balance                        Balance
Year 1       -R50000          R10000        -R70000        R30000
Year 2       -R40000          R10000        -R40000        R50000
Year 3       -R30000          R20000        R10000         R0
Year 4       -R10000          R30000        R10000         R50000
Year 5       R20000           R25000        R60000         R60000
Year 6       R45000           R60000        R120000        R25000
Year 7       R105000                        R145000
CLASS EXERCISE
                     PROJECT C                       PROJECT D

Initial               R65000                          R85000
investment
               Opening     Yearly Return     Opening      Yearly Return
               Balance                       Balance
Year 1                         20000       -R85000
Year 2                         5000        -R65000
Year 3                         10000       -R45000
Year 4                         10000       -R20000
Year 5                         35000       R15000
Year 6                         10000       R45000
Year 7                                     R60000


FILL IN THE GAPS FOR PROJECT C AND PROJECT D
CLASS EXERCISE
                       PROJECT C                      PROJECT D

Initial                 R65000                         R85000
investment
               Opening      Yearly Return     Opening      Yearly Return
               Balance                        Balance
Year 1       -R65000          R20000        -R85000        R20000
Year 2       -R45000             R5000      -R65000        R20000
Year 3       -R40000          R10000        -R45000        R25000
Year 4       -R30000          R10000        -R20000        R35000
Year 5       -R20000          R35000        R15000         R30000
Year 6       R15000           R10000        R45000         R15000
Year 7       R25000                         R60000
CALCULATION OF PAYBACK TIME
Just year is not sufficient, need to calculate number of months as well




PAYBACK MONTH = OUTSTANDING BALANCE FOR PAYBACK YEAR X 12
                       REVENUE FOR PAYBAK YEAR




THIS FORMULA IS IMPORTANT: REMEMBER IT!!!!!
COMPARISON OF PROJECTS
                       PROJECT A                      PROJECT B

Initial                R50000                          R70000
investment
               Opening      Yearly Return     Opening      Yearly Return
               Balance                        Balance
Year 1       -R50000          R10000        -R70000        R30000
Year 2       -R40000          R10000        -R40000        R50000
Year 3       -R30000          R20000        R10000         R0
Year 4       -R10000          R30000        R10000         R50000
Year 5       R20000           R25000        R60000         R60000
Year 6       R45000           R60000        R120000        R25000
Year 7       R105000                        R145000

Payback month A = (10000/30000) x 12 = 4 months
PAYBACK = 3 years 4 months
CLASS EXERCISE
                       PROJECT C                      PROJECT D

Initial                 R65000                         R85000
investment
               Opening      Yearly Return     Opening      Yearly Return
               Balance                        Balance
Year 1       -R65000          R20000        -R85000        R20000
Year 2       -R45000             R5000      -R65000        R20000
Year 3       -R40000          R10000        -R45000        R25000
Year 4       -R30000          R10000        -R20000        R35000
Year 5       -R20000          R35000        R15000         R30000
Year 6       R15000           R10000        R45000         R15000
Year 7       R25000                         R60000


CALCULATE PAYBACK (YR & MONTHS) FOR PROJECTS B,C & D
PAYBACK EXERCISE

           PROJECT                  PAYBACK
              A                 3 YRS & 4 MONTHS
              B                 1 YR & 10 MONTHS
              C                 4 YRS & 7 MONTHS
              D                 3 YRS & 7 MONTHS


    WHICH PROJECT WOULD YOU SELECT AND WHY?
MISTAKES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Show “Titanic” film
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
PROJECT A
                                               PROJECT A                   PROJECT B
Step 1
Total Yearly returns         Initial                R50000                      R70000
                             investment
Step 2
                                           Opening           Yearly    Opening       Yearly
Total Profit/Loss = yearly                 Balance           Return    Balance       Return
returns – initial
                             Year 1       -R50000        R10000       -R70000      R30000
investment
                             Year 2       -R40000        R10000       -R40000      R50000

Step 3                       Year 3       -R30000        R20000       R10000       R0

Calculate average profit     Year 4       -R10000        R30000       R10000       R50000
= Total profit/ no years     Year 5       R20000         R25000       R60000       R60000
                             Year 6       R45000         R60000       R120000      R25000

                                          R105000       R155000       R145000
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
Measures the rate of growth of an investment




ROI = AVERAGE PROFIT          X 100
     INITIAL INVESTMENT


ROI “A” = 17500    X 100
         50000


       = 35%
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
Now calculate the Return on Investment for projects B, C & D
PROJECT COMPARISON
                       PAYBACK               ROI
 A                     3 YRS 4 MTHS          35%
 B                     1 YR 10 MTHS          34.52%
 C                     4 YRS 7 MTHS          6.4%
 D                     3 YRS 7 MTHS          11.76%


TYPICALLY WE WOULD SELECT PROJECT WITH HIGHEST ROI
NET PRESENT VALUE
Takes time value of money into consideration
INVEST TODAY                         GENERATE ONE YEAR

R100000                                  R105000   X

 INTEREST RATE IS 9% SO WOULD NEED A MINIMUM OF
 R109000 TO BREAKEVEN!!!
NET PRESENT VALUE
 MEASURES VALUE OF INVESTMENT IN RAND


 ONLY CONSIDER PROJECTS WITH A NPV GREATER THAN 0


 NEED A DISCOUNT FACTOR – PROJECT MANAGERS HAVE TO IDENTIFY THIS FOR
  THEIR PROJECT


 IN EXAM THIS FIGURE WILL BE GIVEN TO YOU
NET PRESENT VALUE           EXAMPLE
Discount factor             Interest rate = 9%
                            • Convert this to a decimal fraction
                              by dividing by 100 = 0.09
                𝟏           • Year 1 =
                                            𝟏
                                                      = 0.917
                                                  𝟏
                                         𝟏+𝟎.𝟎𝟗
              𝟏+ 𝒊      𝒏
                                            𝟏
                            • Year 2 =            𝟐   = 0.842
i = the interest rate                    𝟏+𝟎.𝟎𝟗
n = number of years                         𝟏
                            • Year 3 =            𝟑   = 0.772
                                         𝟏+𝟎.𝟎𝟗

                            • And so on for no of years
NET PRESENT VALUE
    YEAR       DISCOUNT    REVENUE    DISCOUNTED     COST   DISCOUNTED
                FACTOR                  REVENUE                COST
                   D         R            DxR
0          1                                       R50000   R50000
1          0.917          R10000      R9170
2          0.842          R10000      R8420
3          0.772          R20000      R15440
4          0.708          R30000      R21240
5          0.650          R25000      R16250
6          0.596          R60000      R35760
                  TOTAL R155000       R106280      R50000   R50000




NPV = DISCOUNTED REVENUE – DISCOUNTED COST = R106280-R50000

                           = R56280
NET PRESENT VALUE
CLASS EXERCISE


   PREPARE NPV TABLES FOR PROJECT B,C & D. ASSUME INTERST RATE IS 9% FOR
    ALL PROJECTS
   CALCULATE THE NPV FOR ALL 3 PROJECTS AND ADD TO YOUR COMPARISON
    TABLE OF PROJECTS
NPV PROJECT B

PROJECT B
            DISCOUNT                  DISCOUNTED        DISCOUNTED
  YEAR       FACTOR     REVENUE         REVENUE    COST    COST
    0              1                               70000     70000
    1           0.917      30000           27510
    2           0.842      50000           42100
    3           0.772             0            0
    4           0.708      50000           35400
    5            0.65      60000           39000
    6           0.596      25000           14900
                TOTAL     215000          158910 70000       70000
                                             NPV 88910
NPV – PROJECT C
PROJECT C
            DISCOUNT               DISCOUNTED         DISCOUNTED
  YEAR       FACTOR     REVENUE      REVENUE     COST    COST
    0              1                             65000     65000
    1           0.917      20000         18340
    2           0.842       5000          4210
    3           0.772      10000          7720
    4           0.708      10000          7080
    5            0.65      35000         22750
    6           0.596      10000          5960
    TOTAL                  90000         66060 65000       65000
                                           NPV    1060
NPV – PROJECT D
PROJECT D
             DISCOUNT               DISCOUNTED         DISCOUNTED
   YEAR       FACTOR     REVENUE      REVENUE     COST    COST
    0               1                             85000     85000
    1            0.917      20000        18340
    2            0.842      20000        16840
    3            0.772      25000        19300
    4            0.708      35000         24780
    5             0.65      30000        19500
    6            0.596      15000         8940
     TOTAL                 145000        107700 85000       85000
                                           NPV 22700
PROJECT COMPARISON
                     PAYBACK            ROI            NPV
 A               3 YRS 4 MTHS    35%              R56280
 B               1 YR 10 MTHS    34.52%           R88910
 C               4 YRS 7 MTHS    6.4%             R1060
 D               3 YRS 7 MTHS    11.76%           R22700


TYPICALLY WE WOULD SELECT PROJECT WITH LOWEST PAYBACK TIME,
HIGHEST ROI, HIGHEST NPV
INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN
 The rate at which the NPV is equal to zero.
 The project with the highest IIR should be selected
 You are not required to perform IIR calculations for
  this course
NON – FINANCIAL SELECTION TECHNIQUES
Four non-financial techniques:-


   Production considerations


   Marketing considerations


   Personnel considerations


   Administration and other considerations
WEIGHTED SCORING MODELS
 Weight between 0 and 1
 The more important the criteria the higher the
  weighting
 The total of the weights must add up to 1
 Compile a scoring matrix for each of listed criteria
 Calculate a score per category and an overall score
 Different catergories can then be compared on an
  equal basis
WEIGHTED SCORING MODELS
              PROJECT A

(14/15)*100   CRITERIA                                              SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE   4*0.1
              FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
                                          PAYBACK                       4     0.1           0.4
                          93%             ROI                           5     0.2             1
                                          NPV                           5     0.2             1
                                                           TOTAL       14

(4/10)*100
              PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
                                          NO DISRUPTION                 1    0.05          0.05
                                          REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY
                          40%             AVAILABLE                     3     0.1           0.3
                                                           TOTAL        4

              MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS
                                          BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE
                          100%            WORK                          5     0.2             1
                                                            TOTAL       5

              PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS
                                          EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT
                                                                                                  (3.9/5)*100
                                          REQUIRED                      1    0.05          0.05
                                          NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO
                          20%             STAFF                         1    0.05          0.05
                                                            TOTAL       2

              ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER
              CONSIDERATONS

                                          ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE        1    0.05          0.05
                          20%                                                   1           3.9
                                                           TOTAL        1                  78%
CLASS EXERCISE – WEIGHTED SCORING
     PROJECT B

     CRITERIA                                                SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE
     FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
                                 PAYBACK                          2     0.1
                                 ROI                              3     0.2
                                 NPV                              5     0.2
                                                    TOTAL        10


     PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
                                 NO DISRUPTION                    3    0.05
                                 REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY
                                 AVAILABLE                        1     0.1
                                                   TOTAL          4

     MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS
                                 BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE
                                 WORK                             3     0.2
                                                     TOTAL        3

     PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS
                                 EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT
                                 REQUIRED                         3    0.05
                                 NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO
                                 STAFF                            3    0.05
                                                     TOTAL        6

     ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER
     CONSIDERATONS

                                 ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE           3    0.05
                                                                          1
                                                    TOTAL         3
WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT B
    PROJECT B
    CRITERIA                                               SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE
    FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
                                PAYBACK                        2     0.1            0.2
                67%             ROI                            3     0.2            0.6
                                NPV                            5     0.2              1
                                                   TOTAL      10

    PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
                                NO DISRUPTION                   3   0.05           0.15
                                REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY
                40%             AVAILABLE                       1    0.1            0.1
                                                  TOTAL         4

    MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS
                                BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE
                60%             WORK                            3    0.2            0.6
                                                   TOTAL        3

    PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS
                                EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT
                                REQUIRED                        3   0.05           0.15
                                NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO
                60%             STAFF                           3   0.05           0.15
                                                   TOTAL        6



    ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER
    CONSIDERATONS
                                ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE          3   0.05           0.15
                60%                                                    1            3.1
WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT C
    PROJECT C
    CRITERIA                                              SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE
    FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
                                PAYBACK                       5     0.1
                                ROI                           3     0.2
                                NPV                           2     0.2
                                                  TOTAL      10


    PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
                                NO DISRUPTION                 2    0.05
                                REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY
                                AVAILABLE                     4     0.1
                                                  TOTAL       6


    MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS
                                BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE
                                WORK                          5     0.2
                                                  TOTAL       5


    PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS
                                EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT
                                REQUIRED                      1    0.05
                                NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO
                                STAFF                         3    0.05
                                                  TOTAL       4

    ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER
    CONSIDERATONS
                                ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE        3    0.05
                                                                      1
WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT C
   PROJECT C
   CRITERIA                                               SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE
   FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
                               PAYBACK                         5     0.1           0.5
                67%            ROI                             3     0.2           0.6
                               NPV                             2     0.2           0.4
                                                  TOTAL       10


   PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
                               NO DISRUPTION                   2    0.05           0.1
                               REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY
                60%            AVAILABLE                       4     0.1           0.4
                                                  TOTAL        6


   MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS
                               BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE
               100%            WORK                            5     0.2                1
                                                  TOTAL        5


   PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS
                               EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT
                               REQUIRED                        1    0.05          0.05
                               NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO
                40%            STAFF                           3    0.05          0.15
                                                  TOTAL        4

   ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER
   CONSIDERATONS
                               ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE          3    0.05          0.15
                60%                                                   1           3.35
                                                  TOTAL        3                  67%
WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT D
  PROJECT D
  CRITERIA                                                  SCORE WEIGHT       RELATIVE SCORE
  FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
                              PAYBACK                            2     0.1
                              ROI                                2     0.2
                              NPV                                2     0.2
                                                    TOTAL        6


  PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
                              NO DISRUPTION                      5    0.05
                              REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY
                              AVAILABLE                          4     0.1
                                                    TOTAL        9


  MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS
                              BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE WORK         2     0.2
                                                    TOTAL        2


  PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS
                              EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT
                              REQUIRED                           4    0.05
                              NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO
                              STAFF                              3    0.05
                                                    TOTAL        7

  ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER
  CONSIDERATONS
                              ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE             3    0.05
                                                                           1
                                                    TOTAL        3
WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT D
  PROJECT D
  CRITERIA                                                  SCORE WEIGHT       RELATIVE SCORE
  FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
                              PAYBACK                            2     0.1                  0.2
                40%           ROI                                2     0.2                  0.4
                              NPV                                2     0.2                  0.4
                                                    TOTAL        6


  PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
                              NO DISRUPTION                      5    0.05                 0.25
                              REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY
                90%           AVAILABLE                          4     0.1                  0.4
                                                    TOTAL        9


  MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS
                40%           BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE WORK         2     0.2                  0.4
                                                    TOTAL        2


  PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS
                              EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT
                              REQUIRED                           4    0.05                  0.2
                              NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO
                70%           STAFF                              3    0.05                 0.15
                                                    TOTAL        7

  ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER
  CONSIDERATONS
                              ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE             3    0.05                 0.15
                60%                                                        1               2.55
                                                    TOTAL        3                         51%
PROJECT COMPARISON
                 PAYBACK          ROI        NPV       WEIGHTED
                                                        SCORE
A              3 YRS 4      35%          R56280           78%
               MTHS
B              1 YR 10      34.52%       R88910           62%
               MTHS
C              4 YRS 7      6.4%         R1060            67%
               MTHS
D              3 YRS 7      11.76%       R22700           51%
               MTHS




    TYPICALLY WE WOULD SELECT PROJECT WITH LOWEST PAYBACK TIME,
    HIGHEST ROI, HIGHEST NPV, HIGHEST WEIGHTED SCORE
FEASIBILITY
• Identification and analysis of risk
• Completed estimates may look promising but it is possible that
  the project selection team may require a FEASIBILITY STUDY
• Must eliminate bias from feasibility study so research team
  should be separate to project team
• Project team may have pre-conceived ideas that would influence
  the research
• Feasibility study should give a lot more accurate estimates than
  conceptual estimate
INTRODUCTION TO RISK MANAGEMENT
• Will be looking at risk management in detail in LU3
• Risks are negative events that can happen in the future
• Cannot predict future with 100% accuracy
• Can assume that past events will often repeat themselves
  (remember Titanic video!!)
• If events occurred often in the past it is reasonable to assume
  they will happen again in the future
• If event very negative (Olympia vs Titanic) Project Manager
  should carefully consider appropriate actions
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT

WHAT IS A STAKEHOLDER?
“….people or organisations with vested interests
  in your project, who can either gain or lose as
  a result of your operations” (Heldman, 2005)
EXAMPLES OF STAKEHOLDERS


   Project sponsor
   Client
   Government
   Employees
STAKEHOLDERS

                           ORGANISATION




        GOVERNMENT                              COMPETITION




                           PROJECT
      CLIENT                                          EMPLOYEES




                                      ENVIRONMENTAL
                 SOCIETY
                                          GROUPS
STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT

Stakeholders (of all types) must be managed!

Group Activity


Read case study on pages 73/74 of manual
STAKEHOLDER CONFLICT
• Stakeholders usually have different expectations
• Managing these expectations is stressful


• “You can please some of the people all of the time, all
  of the people some of the time, but not all of the
  people all of the time”
CONSTRAINTS
• Internal constraints – limitations from within the
  company and project e.g. behaviour of project team.
  Project Manager should have control over these
  constraints.


• External constraints – limitations from outside e.g.
  actions of environmental groups, supplier delivery
  schedules. Project Managers have little control over
  these constraints
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS

A weighting scale approach to decision-making
where the disadvantages are listed on one side
of the balance and disadvantages on the other

See example p75
PROBLEMS WITH COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

• Cannot quantify intangible benefits
• Costs can be calculated with a degree of
  accuracy
• Scales may therefore be unfairly tipped to
  costs
OBTAINING FINANCE
• CORPORATE FINANCE – suitable for projects with
  financing needs less than R250 million
• Relatively quick to obtain and is suitable for
  organisations that have a good financial position
• PROJECT FINANCE –involves investments by a series
  of partners e.g. Government, investment houses.
• Can be lengthy to obtain much larger amounts can be
  borrowed than with corporate finance
PROJECT CHARTER
• Official initiating document
• Formally recognises projects existence
• Authorises Project Manager to proceed with project
• Makes resources available to project
• Co-ordinates stakeholders inputs
• Provides detailed overview of project requirements

SEE TEMPLATE ON P77
INITIAL MEETING
•   Usually between Project Manager, the client and
    sometimes the sponsor

Más contenido relacionado

Destacado

Project Initiation Document
Project Initiation DocumentProject Initiation Document
Project Initiation DocumentDave Angelow
 
Project initiation
Project initiationProject initiation
Project initiationukrulz4u
 
Project Initiation and Scoping
Project Initiation and ScopingProject Initiation and Scoping
Project Initiation and ScopingCiprian Rusen
 
2. project initiation
2. project initiation2. project initiation
2. project initiationMad Jutt
 
Pmp presentation chapter 1 to 7
Pmp presentation chapter 1 to 7Pmp presentation chapter 1 to 7
Pmp presentation chapter 1 to 7Saad Merie
 

Destacado (6)

Project Initiation Document
Project Initiation DocumentProject Initiation Document
Project Initiation Document
 
Project initiation
Project initiationProject initiation
Project initiation
 
Project Initiation and Scoping
Project Initiation and ScopingProject Initiation and Scoping
Project Initiation and Scoping
 
Project Initiation Process
Project Initiation ProcessProject Initiation Process
Project Initiation Process
 
2. project initiation
2. project initiation2. project initiation
2. project initiation
 
Pmp presentation chapter 1 to 7
Pmp presentation chapter 1 to 7Pmp presentation chapter 1 to 7
Pmp presentation chapter 1 to 7
 

Similar a Learning unit 2 lecture

Cf Capital Budgeting 6
Cf Capital Budgeting 6Cf Capital Budgeting 6
Cf Capital Budgeting 6rajeevgupta
 
Cf Capital Budgeting 6
Cf Capital Budgeting 6Cf Capital Budgeting 6
Cf Capital Budgeting 6rajeevgupta
 
Cf%20 Capital%20 Budgeting%206
Cf%20 Capital%20 Budgeting%206Cf%20 Capital%20 Budgeting%206
Cf%20 Capital%20 Budgeting%206rajeevgupta
 
Chapter8 investmentcriteria
Chapter8 investmentcriteriaChapter8 investmentcriteria
Chapter8 investmentcriteriaAKSHAYA0000
 
Investment criteria modified npv,irr
Investment criteria modified npv,irrInvestment criteria modified npv,irr
Investment criteria modified npv,irrTanvi Gupta
 
Finalize Updated 1200hrs - 03.09.2016 - Group 8 Presentation
Finalize Updated 1200hrs - 03.09.2016 - Group 8 PresentationFinalize Updated 1200hrs - 03.09.2016 - Group 8 Presentation
Finalize Updated 1200hrs - 03.09.2016 - Group 8 PresentationLawrence Koh
 
Capital Budgeting.docx
Capital Budgeting.docxCapital Budgeting.docx
Capital Budgeting.docxsukeerthisuram
 
Lecture cash flow evaluation new
Lecture cash flow evaluation newLecture cash flow evaluation new
Lecture cash flow evaluation newBsgr Planmin
 
Lecture cash flow evaluation new
Lecture cash flow evaluation newLecture cash flow evaluation new
Lecture cash flow evaluation newBsgr Planmin
 
Capital Budgeting Rules 04
Capital Budgeting Rules 04Capital Budgeting Rules 04
Capital Budgeting Rules 04rajeevgupta
 
Capital budgeting
Capital budgetingCapital budgeting
Capital budgetingshagun jain
 
chapter 4 - capital budgeting.ppt
chapter 4 - capital budgeting.pptchapter 4 - capital budgeting.ppt
chapter 4 - capital budgeting.pptFaridah Mohamad
 
LECTURE 4 (2).pptx
LECTURE 4 (2).pptxLECTURE 4 (2).pptx
LECTURE 4 (2).pptxhaiqamalik
 
3 capital budgeting
3 capital budgeting3 capital budgeting
3 capital budgetingDr.R. SELVAM
 
Fin 2732 investment decisions
Fin 2732 investment decisionsFin 2732 investment decisions
Fin 2732 investment decisionsYashGupta744
 
PGBM01 - MBA Financial Management And Control (2015-16 Trm1 A)Lecture 9 lon...
PGBM01 - MBA Financial Management And Control (2015-16 Trm1 A)Lecture 9   lon...PGBM01 - MBA Financial Management And Control (2015-16 Trm1 A)Lecture 9   lon...
PGBM01 - MBA Financial Management And Control (2015-16 Trm1 A)Lecture 9 lon...Aquamarine Emerald
 
3.7 making investment decisions (part 2) - moodle
3.7   making investment decisions (part 2) - moodle3.7   making investment decisions (part 2) - moodle
3.7 making investment decisions (part 2) - moodleMissHowardHA
 

Similar a Learning unit 2 lecture (20)

Cf Capital Budgeting 6
Cf Capital Budgeting 6Cf Capital Budgeting 6
Cf Capital Budgeting 6
 
Cf Capital Budgeting 6
Cf Capital Budgeting 6Cf Capital Budgeting 6
Cf Capital Budgeting 6
 
Cf%20 Capital%20 Budgeting%206
Cf%20 Capital%20 Budgeting%206Cf%20 Capital%20 Budgeting%206
Cf%20 Capital%20 Budgeting%206
 
ROI, NPV and PP
ROI, NPV and PPROI, NPV and PP
ROI, NPV and PP
 
Chapter8 investmentcriteria
Chapter8 investmentcriteriaChapter8 investmentcriteria
Chapter8 investmentcriteria
 
Investment criteria modified npv,irr
Investment criteria modified npv,irrInvestment criteria modified npv,irr
Investment criteria modified npv,irr
 
Finalize Updated 1200hrs - 03.09.2016 - Group 8 Presentation
Finalize Updated 1200hrs - 03.09.2016 - Group 8 PresentationFinalize Updated 1200hrs - 03.09.2016 - Group 8 Presentation
Finalize Updated 1200hrs - 03.09.2016 - Group 8 Presentation
 
Capital Budgeting.docx
Capital Budgeting.docxCapital Budgeting.docx
Capital Budgeting.docx
 
Lecture cash flow evaluation new
Lecture cash flow evaluation newLecture cash flow evaluation new
Lecture cash flow evaluation new
 
Lecture cash flow evaluation new
Lecture cash flow evaluation newLecture cash flow evaluation new
Lecture cash flow evaluation new
 
Capital Budgeting Rules 04
Capital Budgeting Rules 04Capital Budgeting Rules 04
Capital Budgeting Rules 04
 
Capital budgeting
Capital budgetingCapital budgeting
Capital budgeting
 
chapter 4 - capital budgeting.ppt
chapter 4 - capital budgeting.pptchapter 4 - capital budgeting.ppt
chapter 4 - capital budgeting.ppt
 
Priyankabba
PriyankabbaPriyankabba
Priyankabba
 
LECTURE 4 (2).pptx
LECTURE 4 (2).pptxLECTURE 4 (2).pptx
LECTURE 4 (2).pptx
 
3 capital budgeting
3 capital budgeting3 capital budgeting
3 capital budgeting
 
Sfm
SfmSfm
Sfm
 
Fin 2732 investment decisions
Fin 2732 investment decisionsFin 2732 investment decisions
Fin 2732 investment decisions
 
PGBM01 - MBA Financial Management And Control (2015-16 Trm1 A)Lecture 9 lon...
PGBM01 - MBA Financial Management And Control (2015-16 Trm1 A)Lecture 9   lon...PGBM01 - MBA Financial Management And Control (2015-16 Trm1 A)Lecture 9   lon...
PGBM01 - MBA Financial Management And Control (2015-16 Trm1 A)Lecture 9 lon...
 
3.7 making investment decisions (part 2) - moodle
3.7   making investment decisions (part 2) - moodle3.7   making investment decisions (part 2) - moodle
3.7 making investment decisions (part 2) - moodle
 

Más de jillmitchell8778

Más de jillmitchell8778 (20)

Revision workshop 17 january 2013
Revision workshop 17 january 2013Revision workshop 17 january 2013
Revision workshop 17 january 2013
 
Statistics lecture 13 (chapter 13)
Statistics lecture 13 (chapter 13)Statistics lecture 13 (chapter 13)
Statistics lecture 13 (chapter 13)
 
Statistics lecture 12 (chapter 12)
Statistics lecture 12 (chapter 12)Statistics lecture 12 (chapter 12)
Statistics lecture 12 (chapter 12)
 
Statistics lecture 10(ch10)
Statistics lecture 10(ch10)Statistics lecture 10(ch10)
Statistics lecture 10(ch10)
 
Statistics lecture 9 (chapter 8)
Statistics lecture 9 (chapter 8)Statistics lecture 9 (chapter 8)
Statistics lecture 9 (chapter 8)
 
Statistics lecture 8 (chapter 7)
Statistics lecture 8 (chapter 7)Statistics lecture 8 (chapter 7)
Statistics lecture 8 (chapter 7)
 
Qr code lecture
Qr code lectureQr code lecture
Qr code lecture
 
Poisson lecture
Poisson lecturePoisson lecture
Poisson lecture
 
Statistics lecture 7 (ch6)
Statistics lecture 7 (ch6)Statistics lecture 7 (ch6)
Statistics lecture 7 (ch6)
 
Normal lecture
Normal lectureNormal lecture
Normal lecture
 
Binomial lecture
Binomial lectureBinomial lecture
Binomial lecture
 
Statistics lecture 6 (ch5)
Statistics lecture 6 (ch5)Statistics lecture 6 (ch5)
Statistics lecture 6 (ch5)
 
Project admin lu3
Project admin   lu3Project admin   lu3
Project admin lu3
 
Priject admin lu 2
Priject admin   lu 2Priject admin   lu 2
Priject admin lu 2
 
Project admin lu 1
Project admin   lu 1Project admin   lu 1
Project admin lu 1
 
Lu5 how to assess a business opportunity
Lu5   how to assess a business opportunityLu5   how to assess a business opportunity
Lu5 how to assess a business opportunity
 
Lu4 – life cycle stages of a business
Lu4 – life cycle stages of a businessLu4 – life cycle stages of a business
Lu4 – life cycle stages of a business
 
Statistics lecture 5 (ch4)
Statistics lecture 5 (ch4)Statistics lecture 5 (ch4)
Statistics lecture 5 (ch4)
 
Lu 3
Lu 3Lu 3
Lu 3
 
Learning unit 2
Learning unit 2Learning unit 2
Learning unit 2
 

Último

Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped dataMeasures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped dataBabyAnnMotar
 
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHSTextual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHSMae Pangan
 
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdfICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdfVanessa Camilleri
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfJemuel Francisco
 
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemChristalin Nelson
 
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptxMillenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptxJanEmmanBrigoli
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptxiammrhaywood
 
The Contemporary World: The Globalization of World Politics
The Contemporary World: The Globalization of World PoliticsThe Contemporary World: The Globalization of World Politics
The Contemporary World: The Globalization of World PoliticsRommel Regala
 
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptshraddhaparab530
 
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and FilmOppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and FilmStan Meyer
 
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxQ4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxlancelewisportillo
 
ClimART Action | eTwinning Project
ClimART Action    |    eTwinning ProjectClimART Action    |    eTwinning Project
ClimART Action | eTwinning Projectjordimapav
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)lakshayb543
 
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptxROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptxVanesaIglesias10
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4JOYLYNSAMANIEGO
 

Último (20)

Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped dataMeasures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
 
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHSTextual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
 
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdfICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
 
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
 
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptxINCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
 
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptxMillenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
 
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxFINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
 
The Contemporary World: The Globalization of World Politics
The Contemporary World: The Globalization of World PoliticsThe Contemporary World: The Globalization of World Politics
The Contemporary World: The Globalization of World Politics
 
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
 
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and FilmOppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
 
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxQ4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
 
ClimART Action | eTwinning Project
ClimART Action    |    eTwinning ProjectClimART Action    |    eTwinning Project
ClimART Action | eTwinning Project
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
 
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptxROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
 
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxYOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
 

Learning unit 2 lecture

  • 1.
  • 2. LEARNING UNIT OBJECTIVES  Describe the initiation phase  Describe reasons for project to take place  Explain and make use of project estimations  Explain and make use of project selection techniques: financial and non- financial  Discuss feasibility in terms of identification and analysis of risk for Project Selection Purposes  Discuss how to obtain financial support for projects  Describe stakeholder management  Create a project charter and preliminary scope document  Describe the kick off meeting
  • 3. THE INITIATION PHASE Describe Reasons for Initial project to meeting take place Project Initiation Project charter Phase estimations Project Financial selection support techniques Risk analysis and identification
  • 4. YES OR NO Decline Poor returns Limited capacity Six Reasons for a project to take place  Business needs  Market demands  Customer requests  Legal requirements  Technological advances  Social need
  • 5. PROJECT ESTIMATIONS Conceptual Estimate – Best Guess!!! Page 58 example Definitive Estimate – Meat on the bone!!! More research Page 58 example
  • 6. PROJECT SELECTION TECHNIQUES - FINANCIAL Financial selection methods probably most important selection technique. We will look at three techniques:- PAYBACK PERIOD RETURN ON INVESTMENT NET PRESENT VALUE
  • 7. FINANCIAL SELECTION TECHNIQUES METHOD OUTCOME UNIT OF MEASUREMENT Payback Period Measures time taken to Years and months breakeven Return on Investment Measures rate at which Percentage (ROI) investment grows Net Present Value (NPV) Measures overall Rand present day value of present day and future cashflows Internal Rate of Return Growth rate at which Percentage (IRR) NPV is equal to zero
  • 8. COMPARISON OF PROJECTS PROJECT A PROJECT B Initial investment R50000 Year Opening Balance Return Yr 1 R10000 1 -R70000 Return Yr 2 R10000 2 -R40000 Return Yr 3 R20000 3 R10000 Return Yr 4 R30000 4 R10000 Return Yr 5 R25000 5 R60000 Return Yr 6 R60000 6 R120000 7 R145000
  • 9. COMPARISON OF PROJECTS PROJECT A PROJECT B Initial R50000 R70000 investment Opening Yearly Return Opening Yearly Return Balance Balance Year 1 -R50000 R10000 -R70000 R30000 Year 2 -R40000 R10000 -R40000 R50000 Year 3 -R30000 R20000 R10000 R0 Year 4 -R10000 R30000 R10000 R50000 Year 5 R20000 R25000 R60000 R60000 Year 6 R45000 R60000 R120000 R25000 Year 7 R105000 R145000
  • 10. CLASS EXERCISE PROJECT C PROJECT D Initial R65000 R85000 investment Opening Yearly Return Opening Yearly Return Balance Balance Year 1 20000 -R85000 Year 2 5000 -R65000 Year 3 10000 -R45000 Year 4 10000 -R20000 Year 5 35000 R15000 Year 6 10000 R45000 Year 7 R60000 FILL IN THE GAPS FOR PROJECT C AND PROJECT D
  • 11. CLASS EXERCISE PROJECT C PROJECT D Initial R65000 R85000 investment Opening Yearly Return Opening Yearly Return Balance Balance Year 1 -R65000 R20000 -R85000 R20000 Year 2 -R45000 R5000 -R65000 R20000 Year 3 -R40000 R10000 -R45000 R25000 Year 4 -R30000 R10000 -R20000 R35000 Year 5 -R20000 R35000 R15000 R30000 Year 6 R15000 R10000 R45000 R15000 Year 7 R25000 R60000
  • 12. CALCULATION OF PAYBACK TIME Just year is not sufficient, need to calculate number of months as well PAYBACK MONTH = OUTSTANDING BALANCE FOR PAYBACK YEAR X 12 REVENUE FOR PAYBAK YEAR THIS FORMULA IS IMPORTANT: REMEMBER IT!!!!!
  • 13. COMPARISON OF PROJECTS PROJECT A PROJECT B Initial R50000 R70000 investment Opening Yearly Return Opening Yearly Return Balance Balance Year 1 -R50000 R10000 -R70000 R30000 Year 2 -R40000 R10000 -R40000 R50000 Year 3 -R30000 R20000 R10000 R0 Year 4 -R10000 R30000 R10000 R50000 Year 5 R20000 R25000 R60000 R60000 Year 6 R45000 R60000 R120000 R25000 Year 7 R105000 R145000 Payback month A = (10000/30000) x 12 = 4 months PAYBACK = 3 years 4 months
  • 14. CLASS EXERCISE PROJECT C PROJECT D Initial R65000 R85000 investment Opening Yearly Return Opening Yearly Return Balance Balance Year 1 -R65000 R20000 -R85000 R20000 Year 2 -R45000 R5000 -R65000 R20000 Year 3 -R40000 R10000 -R45000 R25000 Year 4 -R30000 R10000 -R20000 R35000 Year 5 -R20000 R35000 R15000 R30000 Year 6 R15000 R10000 R45000 R15000 Year 7 R25000 R60000 CALCULATE PAYBACK (YR & MONTHS) FOR PROJECTS B,C & D
  • 15. PAYBACK EXERCISE PROJECT PAYBACK A 3 YRS & 4 MONTHS B 1 YR & 10 MONTHS C 4 YRS & 7 MONTHS D 3 YRS & 7 MONTHS WHICH PROJECT WOULD YOU SELECT AND WHY?
  • 16. MISTAKES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Show “Titanic” film
  • 17. RETURN ON INVESTMENT PROJECT A PROJECT A PROJECT B Step 1 Total Yearly returns Initial R50000 R70000 investment Step 2 Opening Yearly Opening Yearly Total Profit/Loss = yearly Balance Return Balance Return returns – initial Year 1 -R50000 R10000 -R70000 R30000 investment Year 2 -R40000 R10000 -R40000 R50000 Step 3 Year 3 -R30000 R20000 R10000 R0 Calculate average profit Year 4 -R10000 R30000 R10000 R50000 = Total profit/ no years Year 5 R20000 R25000 R60000 R60000 Year 6 R45000 R60000 R120000 R25000 R105000 R155000 R145000
  • 18. RETURN ON INVESTMENT Measures the rate of growth of an investment ROI = AVERAGE PROFIT X 100 INITIAL INVESTMENT ROI “A” = 17500 X 100 50000 = 35%
  • 19. RETURN ON INVESTMENT Now calculate the Return on Investment for projects B, C & D
  • 20. PROJECT COMPARISON PAYBACK ROI A 3 YRS 4 MTHS 35% B 1 YR 10 MTHS 34.52% C 4 YRS 7 MTHS 6.4% D 3 YRS 7 MTHS 11.76% TYPICALLY WE WOULD SELECT PROJECT WITH HIGHEST ROI
  • 21. NET PRESENT VALUE Takes time value of money into consideration INVEST TODAY GENERATE ONE YEAR R100000 R105000 X INTEREST RATE IS 9% SO WOULD NEED A MINIMUM OF R109000 TO BREAKEVEN!!!
  • 22. NET PRESENT VALUE  MEASURES VALUE OF INVESTMENT IN RAND  ONLY CONSIDER PROJECTS WITH A NPV GREATER THAN 0  NEED A DISCOUNT FACTOR – PROJECT MANAGERS HAVE TO IDENTIFY THIS FOR THEIR PROJECT  IN EXAM THIS FIGURE WILL BE GIVEN TO YOU
  • 23. NET PRESENT VALUE EXAMPLE Discount factor Interest rate = 9% • Convert this to a decimal fraction by dividing by 100 = 0.09 𝟏 • Year 1 = 𝟏 = 0.917 𝟏 𝟏+𝟎.𝟎𝟗 𝟏+ 𝒊 𝒏 𝟏 • Year 2 = 𝟐 = 0.842 i = the interest rate 𝟏+𝟎.𝟎𝟗 n = number of years 𝟏 • Year 3 = 𝟑 = 0.772 𝟏+𝟎.𝟎𝟗 • And so on for no of years
  • 24. NET PRESENT VALUE YEAR DISCOUNT REVENUE DISCOUNTED COST DISCOUNTED FACTOR REVENUE COST D R DxR 0 1 R50000 R50000 1 0.917 R10000 R9170 2 0.842 R10000 R8420 3 0.772 R20000 R15440 4 0.708 R30000 R21240 5 0.650 R25000 R16250 6 0.596 R60000 R35760 TOTAL R155000 R106280 R50000 R50000 NPV = DISCOUNTED REVENUE – DISCOUNTED COST = R106280-R50000 = R56280
  • 25. NET PRESENT VALUE CLASS EXERCISE  PREPARE NPV TABLES FOR PROJECT B,C & D. ASSUME INTERST RATE IS 9% FOR ALL PROJECTS  CALCULATE THE NPV FOR ALL 3 PROJECTS AND ADD TO YOUR COMPARISON TABLE OF PROJECTS
  • 26. NPV PROJECT B PROJECT B DISCOUNT DISCOUNTED DISCOUNTED YEAR FACTOR REVENUE REVENUE COST COST 0 1 70000 70000 1 0.917 30000 27510 2 0.842 50000 42100 3 0.772 0 0 4 0.708 50000 35400 5 0.65 60000 39000 6 0.596 25000 14900 TOTAL 215000 158910 70000 70000 NPV 88910
  • 27. NPV – PROJECT C PROJECT C DISCOUNT DISCOUNTED DISCOUNTED YEAR FACTOR REVENUE REVENUE COST COST 0 1 65000 65000 1 0.917 20000 18340 2 0.842 5000 4210 3 0.772 10000 7720 4 0.708 10000 7080 5 0.65 35000 22750 6 0.596 10000 5960 TOTAL 90000 66060 65000 65000 NPV 1060
  • 28. NPV – PROJECT D PROJECT D DISCOUNT DISCOUNTED DISCOUNTED YEAR FACTOR REVENUE REVENUE COST COST 0 1 85000 85000 1 0.917 20000 18340 2 0.842 20000 16840 3 0.772 25000 19300 4 0.708 35000 24780 5 0.65 30000 19500 6 0.596 15000 8940 TOTAL 145000 107700 85000 85000 NPV 22700
  • 29. PROJECT COMPARISON PAYBACK ROI NPV A 3 YRS 4 MTHS 35% R56280 B 1 YR 10 MTHS 34.52% R88910 C 4 YRS 7 MTHS 6.4% R1060 D 3 YRS 7 MTHS 11.76% R22700 TYPICALLY WE WOULD SELECT PROJECT WITH LOWEST PAYBACK TIME, HIGHEST ROI, HIGHEST NPV
  • 30. INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN  The rate at which the NPV is equal to zero.  The project with the highest IIR should be selected  You are not required to perform IIR calculations for this course
  • 31. NON – FINANCIAL SELECTION TECHNIQUES Four non-financial techniques:-  Production considerations  Marketing considerations  Personnel considerations  Administration and other considerations
  • 32. WEIGHTED SCORING MODELS  Weight between 0 and 1  The more important the criteria the higher the weighting  The total of the weights must add up to 1  Compile a scoring matrix for each of listed criteria  Calculate a score per category and an overall score  Different catergories can then be compared on an equal basis
  • 33. WEIGHTED SCORING MODELS PROJECT A (14/15)*100 CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE 4*0.1 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS PAYBACK 4 0.1 0.4 93% ROI 5 0.2 1 NPV 5 0.2 1 TOTAL 14 (4/10)*100 PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS NO DISRUPTION 1 0.05 0.05 REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY 40% AVAILABLE 3 0.1 0.3 TOTAL 4 MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE 100% WORK 5 0.2 1 TOTAL 5 PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT (3.9/5)*100 REQUIRED 1 0.05 0.05 NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO 20% STAFF 1 0.05 0.05 TOTAL 2 ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER CONSIDERATONS ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE 1 0.05 0.05 20% 1 3.9 TOTAL 1 78%
  • 34. CLASS EXERCISE – WEIGHTED SCORING PROJECT B CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS PAYBACK 2 0.1 ROI 3 0.2 NPV 5 0.2 TOTAL 10 PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS NO DISRUPTION 3 0.05 REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE 1 0.1 TOTAL 4 MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE WORK 3 0.2 TOTAL 3 PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT REQUIRED 3 0.05 NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO STAFF 3 0.05 TOTAL 6 ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER CONSIDERATONS ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE 3 0.05 1 TOTAL 3
  • 35. WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT B PROJECT B CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS PAYBACK 2 0.1 0.2 67% ROI 3 0.2 0.6 NPV 5 0.2 1 TOTAL 10 PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS NO DISRUPTION 3 0.05 0.15 REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY 40% AVAILABLE 1 0.1 0.1 TOTAL 4 MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE 60% WORK 3 0.2 0.6 TOTAL 3 PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT REQUIRED 3 0.05 0.15 NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO 60% STAFF 3 0.05 0.15 TOTAL 6 ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER CONSIDERATONS ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE 3 0.05 0.15 60% 1 3.1
  • 36. WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT C PROJECT C CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS PAYBACK 5 0.1 ROI 3 0.2 NPV 2 0.2 TOTAL 10 PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS NO DISRUPTION 2 0.05 REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE 4 0.1 TOTAL 6 MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE WORK 5 0.2 TOTAL 5 PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT REQUIRED 1 0.05 NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO STAFF 3 0.05 TOTAL 4 ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER CONSIDERATONS ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE 3 0.05 1
  • 37. WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT C PROJECT C CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS PAYBACK 5 0.1 0.5 67% ROI 3 0.2 0.6 NPV 2 0.2 0.4 TOTAL 10 PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS NO DISRUPTION 2 0.05 0.1 REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY 60% AVAILABLE 4 0.1 0.4 TOTAL 6 MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE 100% WORK 5 0.2 1 TOTAL 5 PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT REQUIRED 1 0.05 0.05 NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO 40% STAFF 3 0.05 0.15 TOTAL 4 ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER CONSIDERATONS ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE 3 0.05 0.15 60% 1 3.35 TOTAL 3 67%
  • 38. WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT D PROJECT D CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS PAYBACK 2 0.1 ROI 2 0.2 NPV 2 0.2 TOTAL 6 PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS NO DISRUPTION 5 0.05 REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE 4 0.1 TOTAL 9 MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE WORK 2 0.2 TOTAL 2 PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT REQUIRED 4 0.05 NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO STAFF 3 0.05 TOTAL 7 ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER CONSIDERATONS ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE 3 0.05 1 TOTAL 3
  • 39. WEIGHTED SCORING – PROJECT D PROJECT D CRITERIA SCORE WEIGHT RELATIVE SCORE FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS PAYBACK 2 0.1 0.2 40% ROI 2 0.2 0.4 NPV 2 0.2 0.4 TOTAL 6 PRODUCTION CONSIDERATIONS NO DISRUPTION 5 0.05 0.25 REQUIRED TECHNOLOGY 90% AVAILABLE 4 0.1 0.4 TOTAL 9 MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS 40% BENEFICIAL FOR FUTURE WORK 2 0.2 0.4 TOTAL 2 PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS EXTENSIVE TRAINING NOT REQUIRED 4 0.05 0.2 NO EXCESSIVE STRESS TO 70% STAFF 3 0.05 0.15 TOTAL 7 ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER CONSIDERATONS ADMIN SYSTEM WILL COPE 3 0.05 0.15 60% 1 2.55 TOTAL 3 51%
  • 40. PROJECT COMPARISON PAYBACK ROI NPV WEIGHTED SCORE A 3 YRS 4 35% R56280 78% MTHS B 1 YR 10 34.52% R88910 62% MTHS C 4 YRS 7 6.4% R1060 67% MTHS D 3 YRS 7 11.76% R22700 51% MTHS TYPICALLY WE WOULD SELECT PROJECT WITH LOWEST PAYBACK TIME, HIGHEST ROI, HIGHEST NPV, HIGHEST WEIGHTED SCORE
  • 41. FEASIBILITY • Identification and analysis of risk • Completed estimates may look promising but it is possible that the project selection team may require a FEASIBILITY STUDY • Must eliminate bias from feasibility study so research team should be separate to project team • Project team may have pre-conceived ideas that would influence the research • Feasibility study should give a lot more accurate estimates than conceptual estimate
  • 42. INTRODUCTION TO RISK MANAGEMENT • Will be looking at risk management in detail in LU3 • Risks are negative events that can happen in the future • Cannot predict future with 100% accuracy • Can assume that past events will often repeat themselves (remember Titanic video!!) • If events occurred often in the past it is reasonable to assume they will happen again in the future • If event very negative (Olympia vs Titanic) Project Manager should carefully consider appropriate actions
  • 43. STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT WHAT IS A STAKEHOLDER? “….people or organisations with vested interests in your project, who can either gain or lose as a result of your operations” (Heldman, 2005)
  • 44. EXAMPLES OF STAKEHOLDERS Project sponsor Client Government Employees
  • 45. STAKEHOLDERS ORGANISATION GOVERNMENT COMPETITION PROJECT CLIENT EMPLOYEES ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY GROUPS
  • 46. STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT Stakeholders (of all types) must be managed! Group Activity Read case study on pages 73/74 of manual
  • 47. STAKEHOLDER CONFLICT • Stakeholders usually have different expectations • Managing these expectations is stressful • “You can please some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time”
  • 48. CONSTRAINTS • Internal constraints – limitations from within the company and project e.g. behaviour of project team. Project Manager should have control over these constraints. • External constraints – limitations from outside e.g. actions of environmental groups, supplier delivery schedules. Project Managers have little control over these constraints
  • 49. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS A weighting scale approach to decision-making where the disadvantages are listed on one side of the balance and disadvantages on the other See example p75
  • 50. PROBLEMS WITH COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS • Cannot quantify intangible benefits • Costs can be calculated with a degree of accuracy • Scales may therefore be unfairly tipped to costs
  • 51. OBTAINING FINANCE • CORPORATE FINANCE – suitable for projects with financing needs less than R250 million • Relatively quick to obtain and is suitable for organisations that have a good financial position • PROJECT FINANCE –involves investments by a series of partners e.g. Government, investment houses. • Can be lengthy to obtain much larger amounts can be borrowed than with corporate finance
  • 52. PROJECT CHARTER • Official initiating document • Formally recognises projects existence • Authorises Project Manager to proceed with project • Makes resources available to project • Co-ordinates stakeholders inputs • Provides detailed overview of project requirements SEE TEMPLATE ON P77
  • 53. INITIAL MEETING • Usually between Project Manager, the client and sometimes the sponsor