SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 190
Descargar para leer sin conexión
joegerstandt.com
linkedin.com/in/joegerstandt
  facebook.com/joegerstandt
   youtube.com/joegerstandt
     twitter.com/joegerstandt
           slideshare.net/joeg
MT
engineers
MT
engineers




      MT
  management
MT
             engineers



  NASA
management
                   MT
               management
MT
             engineers



  NASA
management
                   MT
               management
MT
             engineers



  NASA
management
                   MT
               management
Tuesday
morning
January
  28th
  1986
MT
             engineers



  NASA
management
                   MT
               management
NASA
management
                 MT
             management
So, how do you do…




consider                What
decision             makes it
making…    1 - 10     better?
We simply decide
  without thinking
   much about the
 decision process.
-Jim Nightingale
g
r
o
u
p
t
h
i
n
k
groupthink:
mode of thinking that happens
when the desire for harmony in a
decision-making group overrides a
realistic appraisal of alternatives.
Group members try to minimize
conflict and reach a consensus
decision without critical evaluation
of alternative ideas or viewpoints.
Group vs. Individual Decision Making
              groups     individuals
 accuracy

  speed

 creativity

 degree of
acceptance
 efficiency
Group vs. Individual Decision Making
              groups     individuals
 accuracy        x
  speed                       x
 creativity      x
 degree of       x
acceptance
 efficiency                   x
Group vs. Individual Decision Making
              groups     individuals
 accuracy        x
  speed                       x
 creativity      x
 degree of       x
acceptance
 efficiency                   x
What looks like
resistance is
often a lack of
clarity.
       -Switch, Dan and Chip Heath
diversity…
diversity…
      difference
di·ver·si·ty
[dih-vur-si-tee]
noun, plural –ties
1.the state or fact of being
diverse; difference; unlikeness.
2.variety; multiformity.
3.a point of difference.
diversity…
      difference
      relational
diversity…
      difference
      relational
      takes
       many forms
diversity…
      difference
      relational
      takes
       many forms
      disruptive
↑diversity =
 ↑variance in performance


 groups with more diversity
perform better or worse than
 groups with less diversity
difference makes a difference…

• “we vs. they” mentality
• stereotyping
• in-group favoritism
• inter-group conflict
• satisfaction, performance,
  turnover all get worse
inclusion:
     The actions that we take to include
    additional difference in a process or
                    group.
•   fairness of employment practices
•   openness to difference
•   inclusion in decision making
•   integration of networks
•   balanced outcomes
inclusion:
     The actions that we take to include
    additional difference in a process or
                    group.
•   fairness of employment practices
•   openness to difference
•   inclusion in decision making
•   integration of networks
•   balanced outcomes
inclusion:
     The actions that we take to include
    additional difference in a process or
                    group.
•   fairness of employment practices
•   openness to difference
•   inclusion in decision making
•   integration of networks
•   balanced outcomes
inclusion:
     The actions that we take to include
    additional difference in a process or
                    group.
•   fairness of employment practices
•   openness to difference
•   inclusion in decision making
•   integration of networks
•   balanced outcomes
inclusion:
     The actions that we take to include
    additional difference in a process or
                    group.
•   fairness of employment practices
•   openness to difference
•   inclusion in decision making
•   integration of networks
•   balanced outcomes
inclusion:
     The actions that we take to include
    additional difference in a process or
                    group.
•   fairness of employment practices
•   openness to difference
•   inclusion in decision making
•   integration of networks
•   balanced outcomes
let’s take
a break…
inclusion:
          “…being at home…”
            “…belonging…”
“…able to bring my whole self to work…”
 “…feeling that my unique contribution
              was valued…”
     “…my perspective is always
              considered…”
  “…I have a say in what happens…”
identity diversity:
Differences in our social
identities.

cognitive diversity:
Differences in how we think and
solve problems.
d
i   i
d   v
e   e
n   r
t   s
i   i
t   t
y   y
cognitive diversity
 The extent to which the group
 reflects differences in
 knowledge, including beliefs,
 preferences and perspectives.
 -Miller, et al (1998) Strategic Management Journal
analytical     risk taker
 rational       creative
 realistic       flexible
  factual     synthesizer
  logical     conceptual
definitive      intuitive

persistent     passionate
  planner     cooperative
organized      empathetic
disciplined    expressive
 detailed     harmonizing
 practical     responsive
                   -Ned Herrmann
Cerebral Mode (abstract & intellectual thought)
                       ANALYZE                          STRATEGIZE

             Joys                                Joys
                Solving technical problems               Conceptualizing
                 Analyzing complex issues                  Innovating
                      Logical approach                Seeing the big picture
              Frustrations                      Frustrations
            Interpersonal aspects of situations         Routine Meetings
                        Ice breakers                         Details




                                                                                Right Mode
                  Socializing in meetings                   Structure
Left Mode




              Joys                              Joys
                   Implementing ideas                  Expressing ideas
                     Developing plans           Understanding group dynamics
                Follow-up and completion                 Team building
            Frustrations                        Frustrations
                   “Blue Sky” thinking              Logic ahead of feelings
                  Not following the rules          No interaction with people


                       ORGANIZE                          PERSONALIZE
             Limbic Mode (concrete and emotional processing)
analytical     risk taker
 rational       creative
 realistic       flexible
  factual     synthesizer
  logical     conceptual
definitive      intuitive

persistent     passionate
  planner     cooperative
organized      empathetic
disciplined    expressive
 detailed     harmonizing
 practical     responsive
analytical                 risk taker
 rational                   creative
 realistic                   flexible
  factual                 synthesizer
  logical                 conceptual
definitive                  intuitive
              potential
persistent                 passionate
  planner                 cooperative
organized                  empathetic
disciplined                expressive
 detailed                 harmonizing
 practical                 responsive
analytical               risk taker
 rational                 creative
 realistic                 flexible
  factual               synthesizer
  logical               conceptual
definitive                intuitive
              tension
persistent               passionate
  planner               cooperative
organized                empathetic
disciplined              expressive
 detailed               harmonizing
 practical               responsive
share information
  quality decision making
 creative problem solving
                innovation
         fully utilize talent
develop new relationships
    manage relationships
The Social Origin of Good Ideas
        -Ronald Burt, University of Chicago

Teams with greater training and
 experiential diversity introduce
       more innovations.
   “Management Team Tenure and Organizational
      Outcomes” Finkelstein, Hambrick (1999)
          Administrative Science Quarterly
                         &
“Management and Innovation” Bantel, Jackson (2002)
           Strategic Management Journal
share information
  quality decision making
 creative problem solving
                innovation
         fully utilize talent
develop new relationships
    manage relationships
Where do good ideas come
   from? That is simple…from
differences. Creativity comes
 from unlikely juxtapositions.
     The best way to maximize
    differences is to mix ages,
      cultures and disciplines.
    -Nicolas Negroponte, founder MIT Media Lab
MBA
Harvard University
   100 people
team #1



      MBA
Harvard University
   100 people
team #1



                MBA
          Harvard University
             100 people



team #2
team #1



                MBA
          Harvard University
             100 people



team #2
team #1
 friends
   with
cognitive
benefits          MBA
            Harvard University
               100 people



team #2
These theorems that when
solving problems, diversity
  can trump ability and that
  when making predictions
   diversity matters just as
     much as ability are not
  political statements. They
   are mathematical truths.
                     -Scott Page
but…
team #1


This team greatly
overrates its own
problem solving
    capacity.
This team greatly
           underrates its
          problem solving
              capacity.
team #2
Taking it back…




What does
this mean for
your
organization    What needs   Where will
?               to happen?   you start?
What’s in the toolbox?



•perspectives

•heuristics
perspectives
Perspectives are ways of
 representing situations
 and problems, how we
  organize knowledge.
what do you see?
Do you seek out other perspectives?

               peers
        other departments
            customers
        other organizations
         other professions
heuristics
    Heuristics are ways of
     generating solutions.
  Heuristics can vary in their
sophistication, and they can be
    immediate reactions to
 situations or simple rules of
            thumb.
…if you do not
know the answer,
  choose “C”
please add these numbers…
please add these numbers…


1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 =
please add these numbers…


1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 =


                 55
please add these numbers…


1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 =


                 55
   …but how did you do it?
Draw a 9 dot matrix on a blank
paper …
Draw a 9 dot matrix on a blank
paper …

Without lifting your pencil from
the paper, draw exactly four
straight, connected lines that will
go through all nine dots, but
through each dot only once.
“…given enough
eyeballs, all bugs
  are shallow.”
   -Eric Raymond
    (Linus’ Law)
so…

perspectives are how we
see things (problems and
opportunities)
heuristics are how we
approach or solve them
who




      how
dysfunction
dysfunctional   dysfunctional
 agreement      disagreement
also
dysfunction
dysfunctional
dysfunctional     dysfunctional
 agreement
     agreement    disagreement
always
                   disagree lack of
                             trust




  dysfunctional
dysfunctional     dysfunctional
 agreement
     agreement    disagreement


                  us vs.
                  them     personal
                           conflict
always                  always
     agree
               lack of     disagree lack of
              honesty                trust




  dysfunctional
dysfunctional             dysfunctional
 agreement
     agreement            disagreement

    avoid                 us vs.
   conflict   meeting     them     personal
              after the            conflict
              meeting
dysfunctional dysfunctional
dysfunctionalsweet
     agreement disagreement
 agreement
            spot
Groups often fail to
   outperform individuals
because they prematurely
 move to consensus, with
dissenting opinions being
suppressed or dismissed.
-Hackman, Morris (1975) Advances in Experimental
                              Social Psychology
sweet spot
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them & they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
let’s take
a break…
If everyone is
   thinking the same
      thing, someone
  isn’t thinking at all.
-George S. Patton
share difference & commonality
explicit agreements
inquiry vs. advocacy
solutions vs. problems
empathy
i & we vs. them and they
make space for novelty
learn from failure
meta conversations
• triaging / identifying
  different kinds of decisions
• unanimity, democracy,
  consensus, boss
Group vs. Individual Decision Making
              groups     individuals
 accuracy        x
  speed                       x
 creativity      x
 degree of       x
acceptance
 efficiency                   x
brain basics

1.threat vs. reward
brain basics

1.threat vs. reward
2.efficiency
brain basics

1.threat vs. reward
2.efficiency
3.pattern recognition
when the
    brain
locks onto
 a pattern,
it does not
    seek
alternative
stereotype

An idea or image; a mental
framework that contains our
     knowledge, beliefs,
  expectations and feelings
    about a social group.
   Stereotypes allow for no
        individuality.
stereotype
waitress       librarian
smoke
      bowl
eat hamburgers
smoke           knit
      bowl       wear glasses
eat hamburgers    eat salad
confirmation bias

Our tendency to search for or
 interpret new information in
      a way that confirms
 preconceptions and avoids
        information and
     interpretations which
   contradict prior beliefs.
fundamental attribution error

 An unjustified tendency to
   assume that a person’s
actions depend on what kind
  of person that person is
  rather than on the social
    environmental forces
   influencing the person.
consider this…
 …a long time ago, in
  a far away galaxy,
   there was a man
named Uri Treisman…
consider this…
1.Lack of Adequate
  Preparation
2.Socio-economic Status
3.Lack of Family Support
4.Lack of Motivation
consider this…
1.Lack of Adequate
  Preparation
2.Socio-economic Status
3.Lack of Family Support
4.Lack of Motivation
consider this…
1.Lack of Adequate
  Preparation
2.Socio-economic Status
3.Lack of Family Support
4.Lack of Motivation
consider this…
1.Lack of Adequate
  Preparation
2.Socio-economic Status
3.Lack of Family Support
4.Lack of Motivation
consider this…
1.Lack of Adequate
  Preparation
2.Socio-economic Status
3.Lack of Family Support
4.Lack of Motivation
consider this…
1.Power of Assumptions
consider this…
1.Power of Assumptions
2.Intentions vs. Outcomes
consider this…
1.Power of Assumptions
2.Intentions vs. Outcomes
3.Power of Stereotypes
consider this…
1.Power of Assumptions
2.Intentions vs. Outcomes
3.Power of Stereotypes
4.Problem is “out there”
how
high                  low
                      difference           difference

   high                   learning           celebration
                           growth          reinforcement
interaction          self-organization         energy

                          stress          low productivity
                          conflict         wasted energy
                        exhaustion            factions

    low                   reflection           comfort
                            safety            belonging
interaction          clearing the decks   rest and recovery

                         isolation            boredom
                     misunderstanding        stagnation
Difference Matrix
Glenda Eoyang HSDI      frustration            death
high                  low
                      difference           difference

   high                   learning           celebration
                           growth          reinforcement
interaction          self-organization         energy

                          stress          low productivity
                          conflict         wasted energy
                        exhaustion            factions

    low                   reflection           comfort
                            safety            belonging
interaction          clearing the decks   rest and recovery

                         isolation            boredom
                     misunderstanding        stagnation
Difference Matrix
Glenda Eoyang HSDI      frustration            death
high                  low
                      difference           difference

   high                   learning           celebration
                           growth          reinforcement
interaction          self-organization         energy

                          stress          low productivity
                          conflict         wasted energy
                        exhaustion            factions

    low                   reflection           comfort
                            safety            belonging
interaction          clearing the decks   rest and recovery

                         isolation            boredom
                     misunderstanding        stagnation
Difference Matrix
Glenda Eoyang HSDI      frustration            death
high                  low
                      difference           difference

   high                   learning           celebration
                           growth          reinforcement
interaction          self-organization         energy

                          stress          low productivity
                          conflict         wasted energy
                        exhaustion            factions

    low                   reflection           comfort
                            safety            belonging
interaction          clearing the decks   rest and recovery

                         isolation            boredom
                     misunderstanding        stagnation
Difference Matrix
Glenda Eoyang HSDI      frustration            death
high                  low
                      difference           difference

   high                   learning           celebration
                           growth          reinforcement
interaction          self-organization         energy

                          stress          low productivity
                          conflict         wasted energy
                        exhaustion            factions

    low                   reflection           comfort
                            safety            belonging
interaction          clearing the decks   rest and recovery

                         isolation            boredom
                     misunderstanding        stagnation
Difference Matrix
Glenda Eoyang HSDI      frustration            death
high                        low
                           difference                 difference

   high              move to low difference:           move to low
                              Tell a joke.             interaction:
interaction            State a shared value or      Stop communicating.
                                belief.               Leave the area.
                     Share personal experience.       Explain yourself.
                     Pick a low difference topic.        Pick a low
                                                    communication topic.

    low                    move to high                move to high
                           interaction:                 difference:
interaction                Ask a question.               Amplify little
                        Use another medium.              differences
                            Listen more.            Play devils advocate
                     Pick a high communication      Pick a high difference
Difference Matrix               topic.                       topic
Glenda Eoyang HSDI
doing inclusion

 work to
  have a
beginners
   mind
doing inclusion


          listen
         actively
doing inclusion

ask good
  open
  ended
questions
doing inclusion

convey & invite
doing inclusion

express clearly and
    completely
doing inclusion




third
chair
doing inclusion

disentangle intentions
    and outcomes
doing inclusion




build your discomfort
       muscles
doing inclusion

 work to
  have a
beginners
   mind
who
social network analysis
From time to time people discuss
  important matters with other
 people. Looking back over the
  past six months, who are the
people with whom you discussed
   matters important to you?
social network analysis
    Consider the people you
communicate with in order to get
   your work done. Of all the
people you have communicated
 with during the last six months,
who has been the most important
  for getting your work done?
social network analysis
 Consider an important project or
initiative that you are involved in.
Consider the people who would be
 influential for getting it approved
  or obtaining the resources you
  need. Who would you talk to, to
     get the support you need?
social network analysis
    Who do you socialize with?
 (spending time with people after
work hours, visiting one another at
 home, going to social events, out
for meals and so on) Over the last
6 months, who are the main people
  with whom you have socialized
           informally?
analysis
•   group
•   proximity
•   expertise
•   hierarchy
•   gender
•   age
•   race
•   ethnicity
analysis
•   group       What do you have?
•   proximity
                What do you have a
•   expertise
                lot of?
•   hierarchy
•   gender
                What do you not
•   age
                have?
•   race        What do you need to
•   ethnicity   do differently?
Who do you discuss new
ideas with?
Who do you turn to for help?
Who do you get the most
valuable information from?
Who do you trust to keep
your best interests in mind?
consider a ten person team
               1

        2               3

4       5          6    7    8

        9              10
1
2       7
    3       10   4   8
6       9
    5
1
2         7
    3         10    4     8
6         9
    5

        …flow of information?
1
2       7
    3       10      4    8
6       9
    5

                 …influence?
1
2       7
    3       10      4    8
6       9
    5

                 …inclusion?
other ideas for mixing it up…

• social technology
• solution & idea contests
• open space, appreciative inquiry,
  etc.
• mix up assignment, teams, spaces
• more social
• communities of practice
www.joegerstandt.com
  joe.gerstandt@gmail.com
 www.twitter.com/joegerstandt
www.linkedin.com/in/joegerstandt
www.facebook.com/joegerstandt


 402.740.7081
resources
• The Difference: How the Power of Diversity
  Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and
  Societies | Scott Page

• The Wisdom of Crowds | James Surowiecki

• A Whole New Mind | Daniel Pink

• The Medici Effect | Frans Johansson

• The Geography of Thought | Richard Nisbett
resources
• Achieving Success Through Social
  Capital: Tapping Hidden Resources in
  Your Personal and Business Network |
  Wayne E. Baker

• The Whole Brain Business Book
  Ned Herrmann

• Competitive Advantage Through People:
  Unleashing the Power of the Work Force |
  Jeffrey Pfeffer

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Sheives.tom
Sheives.tomSheives.tom
Sheives.tomNASAPMC
 
Conclusion - Decision/action model for soccer - Boyd's snowmobiles - Analysis...
Conclusion - Decision/action model for soccer - Boyd's snowmobiles - Analysis...Conclusion - Decision/action model for soccer - Boyd's snowmobiles - Analysis...
Conclusion - Decision/action model for soccer - Boyd's snowmobiles - Analysis...Larry Paul
 
Mdp 511 2012 organizations in development - session 1
Mdp 511 2012 organizations in development - session 1Mdp 511 2012 organizations in development - session 1
Mdp 511 2012 organizations in development - session 1ANDREA_BEAR
 
What is Constructed Development Theory?
What is Constructed Development Theory?What is Constructed Development Theory?
What is Constructed Development Theory?Dr Darren Stevens
 
A constraints led autodidactic model for soccer
A constraints led autodidactic model for soccerA constraints led autodidactic model for soccer
A constraints led autodidactic model for soccerLarry Paul
 
A decision action model for soccer
A decision action model for soccerA decision action model for soccer
A decision action model for soccerLarry Paul
 
A collaboration is a collaboration is a collaboration
A collaboration is a collaboration is a collaborationA collaboration is a collaboration is a collaboration
A collaboration is a collaboration is a collaborationJohn Thomas
 
Siop 2012 - Contrasting Culture Strength and Climate Strength
Siop 2012 - Contrasting Culture Strength and Climate StrengthSiop 2012 - Contrasting Culture Strength and Climate Strength
Siop 2012 - Contrasting Culture Strength and Climate StrengthDenison Consulting
 
lmitotal leader-jan15-lmidevelopment2
lmitotal leader-jan15-lmidevelopment2lmitotal leader-jan15-lmidevelopment2
lmitotal leader-jan15-lmidevelopment2Frank Kreze
 
Individual decision making, A Decision/Action Model for Soccer – Pt 8
Individual decision making, A Decision/Action Model for Soccer – Pt 8Individual decision making, A Decision/Action Model for Soccer – Pt 8
Individual decision making, A Decision/Action Model for Soccer – Pt 8Larry Paul
 
Agile2011 - What do we supposed to do with these managers now?
Agile2011 - What do we supposed to do with these managers now?Agile2011 - What do we supposed to do with these managers now?
Agile2011 - What do we supposed to do with these managers now?skipangel
 
Retaining & Developing Gen Y For Breakthrough Results
Retaining & Developing Gen Y For Breakthrough ResultsRetaining & Developing Gen Y For Breakthrough Results
Retaining & Developing Gen Y For Breakthrough ResultsDale Carnegie Vietnam
 
Reflections on 10+ new leadership
Reflections on 10+ new leadershipReflections on 10+ new leadership
Reflections on 10+ new leadershipDouwe Buis
 
SMART Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) Workshops
SMART Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) WorkshopsSMART Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) Workshops
SMART Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) WorkshopsSMART Management Consulting
 
Organizational Intelligence
Organizational IntelligenceOrganizational Intelligence
Organizational IntelligenceRichard Veryard
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Sheives.tom
Sheives.tomSheives.tom
Sheives.tom
 
Conclusion - Decision/action model for soccer - Boyd's snowmobiles - Analysis...
Conclusion - Decision/action model for soccer - Boyd's snowmobiles - Analysis...Conclusion - Decision/action model for soccer - Boyd's snowmobiles - Analysis...
Conclusion - Decision/action model for soccer - Boyd's snowmobiles - Analysis...
 
Core Strengths Accountability Workshop
Core Strengths Accountability WorkshopCore Strengths Accountability Workshop
Core Strengths Accountability Workshop
 
Jazz Process
Jazz ProcessJazz Process
Jazz Process
 
Mdp 511 2012 organizations in development - session 1
Mdp 511 2012 organizations in development - session 1Mdp 511 2012 organizations in development - session 1
Mdp 511 2012 organizations in development - session 1
 
What is Constructed Development Theory?
What is Constructed Development Theory?What is Constructed Development Theory?
What is Constructed Development Theory?
 
A constraints led autodidactic model for soccer
A constraints led autodidactic model for soccerA constraints led autodidactic model for soccer
A constraints led autodidactic model for soccer
 
A decision action model for soccer
A decision action model for soccerA decision action model for soccer
A decision action model for soccer
 
Core Strengths Training Overview
Core Strengths Training OverviewCore Strengths Training Overview
Core Strengths Training Overview
 
A collaboration is a collaboration is a collaboration
A collaboration is a collaboration is a collaborationA collaboration is a collaboration is a collaboration
A collaboration is a collaboration is a collaboration
 
Siop 2012 - Contrasting Culture Strength and Climate Strength
Siop 2012 - Contrasting Culture Strength and Climate StrengthSiop 2012 - Contrasting Culture Strength and Climate Strength
Siop 2012 - Contrasting Culture Strength and Climate Strength
 
lmitotal leader-jan15-lmidevelopment2
lmitotal leader-jan15-lmidevelopment2lmitotal leader-jan15-lmidevelopment2
lmitotal leader-jan15-lmidevelopment2
 
Individual decision making, A Decision/Action Model for Soccer – Pt 8
Individual decision making, A Decision/Action Model for Soccer – Pt 8Individual decision making, A Decision/Action Model for Soccer – Pt 8
Individual decision making, A Decision/Action Model for Soccer – Pt 8
 
Agile2011 - What do we supposed to do with these managers now?
Agile2011 - What do we supposed to do with these managers now?Agile2011 - What do we supposed to do with these managers now?
Agile2011 - What do we supposed to do with these managers now?
 
Retaining & Developing Gen Y For Breakthrough Results
Retaining & Developing Gen Y For Breakthrough ResultsRetaining & Developing Gen Y For Breakthrough Results
Retaining & Developing Gen Y For Breakthrough Results
 
Reflections on 10+ new leadership
Reflections on 10+ new leadershipReflections on 10+ new leadership
Reflections on 10+ new leadership
 
Webinar: Collective Leadership, Alain Gauthier
Webinar: Collective Leadership, Alain GauthierWebinar: Collective Leadership, Alain Gauthier
Webinar: Collective Leadership, Alain Gauthier
 
SMART Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) Workshops
SMART Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) WorkshopsSMART Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) Workshops
SMART Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) Workshops
 
CoachingConversations_BNM2016
CoachingConversations_BNM2016CoachingConversations_BNM2016
CoachingConversations_BNM2016
 
Organizational Intelligence
Organizational IntelligenceOrganizational Intelligence
Organizational Intelligence
 

Similar a the diversity advantage

diversity+inclusion=innovation (GRHRA)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (GRHRA)diversity+inclusion=innovation (GRHRA)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (GRHRA)Joe Gerstandt
 
diversity & inclusion (LA SHRM 2012)
diversity & inclusion (LA SHRM 2012)diversity & inclusion (LA SHRM 2012)
diversity & inclusion (LA SHRM 2012)Joe Gerstandt
 
differences (American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Meeting January 2012))
differences (American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Meeting January 2012))differences (American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Meeting January 2012))
differences (American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Meeting January 2012))Joe Gerstandt
 
diversity+inclusion=innovation (stryker medical)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (stryker medical)diversity+inclusion=innovation (stryker medical)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (stryker medical)Joe Gerstandt
 
Dialogue & Collective Sensemaking
Dialogue & Collective SensemakingDialogue & Collective Sensemaking
Dialogue & Collective SensemakingPeter Jones
 
great minds do not think alike (SHRM 2011)
great minds do not think alike (SHRM 2011)great minds do not think alike (SHRM 2011)
great minds do not think alike (SHRM 2011)Joe Gerstandt
 
diversity+inclusion=innovation (great ideas 2011)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (great ideas 2011)diversity+inclusion=innovation (great ideas 2011)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (great ideas 2011)Joe Gerstandt
 
Let The Wild Rumpus Start (NEHHLS 2012)
Let The Wild Rumpus Start (NEHHLS 2012)Let The Wild Rumpus Start (NEHHLS 2012)
Let The Wild Rumpus Start (NEHHLS 2012)Joe Gerstandt
 
diversity+inclusion=innovation (tscpa)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (tscpa)diversity+inclusion=innovation (tscpa)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (tscpa)Joe Gerstandt
 
a whole new talent | the intersection of diversity and talent
a whole new talent | the intersection of diversity and talent a whole new talent | the intersection of diversity and talent
a whole new talent | the intersection of diversity and talent Joe Gerstandt
 
C2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked Problems
C2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked ProblemsC2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked Problems
C2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked ProblemsPeter Jones
 
ASTD NY - Tailoring e-learning using Neuroscience and Work Styles
ASTD NY - Tailoring e-learning using Neuroscience and Work StylesASTD NY - Tailoring e-learning using Neuroscience and Work Styles
ASTD NY - Tailoring e-learning using Neuroscience and Work StylesMarkEMiller
 
Cross cultural negotiation and parallel thinking
Cross cultural negotiation and parallel thinkingCross cultural negotiation and parallel thinking
Cross cultural negotiation and parallel thinkingMadhu Prabakaran
 
Let the Wild Rumpus Start (Great Ideas 2012)
Let the Wild Rumpus Start (Great Ideas 2012)Let the Wild Rumpus Start (Great Ideas 2012)
Let the Wild Rumpus Start (Great Ideas 2012)Joe Gerstandt
 
Encouraging and Facilitating Collaboration at Work
Encouraging and Facilitating Collaboration at WorkEncouraging and Facilitating Collaboration at Work
Encouraging and Facilitating Collaboration at WorkMichael Sampson
 
Personality Final
Personality FinalPersonality Final
Personality FinalChrissy Ann
 
FORWARD! Twin Cities (Sept 2 & 3) slides
FORWARD! Twin Cities  (Sept 2 & 3) slidesFORWARD! Twin Cities  (Sept 2 & 3) slides
FORWARD! Twin Cities (Sept 2 & 3) slidesJoe Gerstandt
 
Sam concepts and tools 2012
Sam concepts and tools 2012Sam concepts and tools 2012
Sam concepts and tools 2012MARiAMADA1906
 
Habit 3 visualisation combats complexity
Habit 3 visualisation combats complexityHabit 3 visualisation combats complexity
Habit 3 visualisation combats complexityMashauri Limited
 

Similar a the diversity advantage (20)

diversity+inclusion=innovation (GRHRA)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (GRHRA)diversity+inclusion=innovation (GRHRA)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (GRHRA)
 
diversity & inclusion (LA SHRM 2012)
diversity & inclusion (LA SHRM 2012)diversity & inclusion (LA SHRM 2012)
diversity & inclusion (LA SHRM 2012)
 
differences (American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Meeting January 2012))
differences (American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Meeting January 2012))differences (American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Meeting January 2012))
differences (American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Meeting January 2012))
 
diversity+inclusion=innovation (stryker medical)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (stryker medical)diversity+inclusion=innovation (stryker medical)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (stryker medical)
 
Dialogue & Collective Sensemaking
Dialogue & Collective SensemakingDialogue & Collective Sensemaking
Dialogue & Collective Sensemaking
 
great minds do not think alike (SHRM 2011)
great minds do not think alike (SHRM 2011)great minds do not think alike (SHRM 2011)
great minds do not think alike (SHRM 2011)
 
diversity+inclusion=innovation (great ideas 2011)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (great ideas 2011)diversity+inclusion=innovation (great ideas 2011)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (great ideas 2011)
 
Let The Wild Rumpus Start (NEHHLS 2012)
Let The Wild Rumpus Start (NEHHLS 2012)Let The Wild Rumpus Start (NEHHLS 2012)
Let The Wild Rumpus Start (NEHHLS 2012)
 
diversity+inclusion=innovation (tscpa)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (tscpa)diversity+inclusion=innovation (tscpa)
diversity+inclusion=innovation (tscpa)
 
a whole new talent | the intersection of diversity and talent
a whole new talent | the intersection of diversity and talent a whole new talent | the intersection of diversity and talent
a whole new talent | the intersection of diversity and talent
 
C2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked Problems
C2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked ProblemsC2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked Problems
C2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked Problems
 
ASTD NY - Tailoring e-learning using Neuroscience and Work Styles
ASTD NY - Tailoring e-learning using Neuroscience and Work StylesASTD NY - Tailoring e-learning using Neuroscience and Work Styles
ASTD NY - Tailoring e-learning using Neuroscience and Work Styles
 
Cognitive diversity
Cognitive diversityCognitive diversity
Cognitive diversity
 
Cross cultural negotiation and parallel thinking
Cross cultural negotiation and parallel thinkingCross cultural negotiation and parallel thinking
Cross cultural negotiation and parallel thinking
 
Let the Wild Rumpus Start (Great Ideas 2012)
Let the Wild Rumpus Start (Great Ideas 2012)Let the Wild Rumpus Start (Great Ideas 2012)
Let the Wild Rumpus Start (Great Ideas 2012)
 
Encouraging and Facilitating Collaboration at Work
Encouraging and Facilitating Collaboration at WorkEncouraging and Facilitating Collaboration at Work
Encouraging and Facilitating Collaboration at Work
 
Personality Final
Personality FinalPersonality Final
Personality Final
 
FORWARD! Twin Cities (Sept 2 & 3) slides
FORWARD! Twin Cities  (Sept 2 & 3) slidesFORWARD! Twin Cities  (Sept 2 & 3) slides
FORWARD! Twin Cities (Sept 2 & 3) slides
 
Sam concepts and tools 2012
Sam concepts and tools 2012Sam concepts and tools 2012
Sam concepts and tools 2012
 
Habit 3 visualisation combats complexity
Habit 3 visualisation combats complexityHabit 3 visualisation combats complexity
Habit 3 visualisation combats complexity
 

Más de Joe Gerstandt

Inclusion by Design (2016 SHR Diversity Conference) joe gerstandt
Inclusion by Design (2016 SHR Diversity Conference)   joe gerstandtInclusion by Design (2016 SHR Diversity Conference)   joe gerstandt
Inclusion by Design (2016 SHR Diversity Conference) joe gerstandtJoe Gerstandt
 
Got Bias? (Oregon D&I Conference) joe gerstandt
Got Bias? (Oregon D&I Conference) joe gerstandtGot Bias? (Oregon D&I Conference) joe gerstandt
Got Bias? (Oregon D&I Conference) joe gerstandtJoe Gerstandt
 
Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16Joe Gerstandt
 
Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016Joe Gerstandt
 
The Inclusive Employee Experience - joe gerstandt
The Inclusive Employee Experience - joe gerstandtThe Inclusive Employee Experience - joe gerstandt
The Inclusive Employee Experience - joe gerstandtJoe Gerstandt
 
The Authenticity Advantage SHRM Atlanta 2016 joe gerstandt
The Authenticity Advantage SHRM Atlanta 2016   joe gerstandtThe Authenticity Advantage SHRM Atlanta 2016   joe gerstandt
The Authenticity Advantage SHRM Atlanta 2016 joe gerstandtJoe Gerstandt
 
joe gerstandt The Future of Diversity and Inclusion (SHRM 2015)
joe gerstandt The Future of Diversity and Inclusion (SHRM 2015)joe gerstandt The Future of Diversity and Inclusion (SHRM 2015)
joe gerstandt The Future of Diversity and Inclusion (SHRM 2015)Joe Gerstandt
 
Future of Diversity and Inclusion 4 Next Practices (HRAM 2015)
Future of Diversity and Inclusion  4 Next Practices (HRAM 2015)Future of Diversity and Inclusion  4 Next Practices (HRAM 2015)
Future of Diversity and Inclusion 4 Next Practices (HRAM 2015)Joe Gerstandt
 
Flying your Freak Flag 2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
Flying your Freak Flag   2015 Forum on Workplace InclusionFlying your Freak Flag   2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
Flying your Freak Flag 2015 Forum on Workplace InclusionJoe Gerstandt
 
Inclusion by Design | joe gerstandt | 2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
Inclusion by Design |  joe gerstandt | 2015 Forum on Workplace InclusionInclusion by Design |  joe gerstandt | 2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
Inclusion by Design | joe gerstandt | 2015 Forum on Workplace InclusionJoe Gerstandt
 
Inclusion by Design (ASAE Great Ideas 2015)
Inclusion by Design (ASAE Great Ideas 2015)Inclusion by Design (ASAE Great Ideas 2015)
Inclusion by Design (ASAE Great Ideas 2015)Joe Gerstandt
 
The Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 4 Next Practices (2014 Bahamas HRDA Co...
The Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 4 Next Practices (2014 Bahamas HRDA Co...The Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 4 Next Practices (2014 Bahamas HRDA Co...
The Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 4 Next Practices (2014 Bahamas HRDA Co...Joe Gerstandt
 
Doing Conflict Well joe gerstandt #SHRMDiv
Doing Conflict Well joe gerstandt #SHRMDivDoing Conflict Well joe gerstandt #SHRMDiv
Doing Conflict Well joe gerstandt #SHRMDivJoe Gerstandt
 
Flying your Freak Flag (Kansas SHRM 2014)
Flying your Freak Flag (Kansas SHRM 2014)Flying your Freak Flag (Kansas SHRM 2014)
Flying your Freak Flag (Kansas SHRM 2014)Joe Gerstandt
 
diversity+inclusion=innovation 2014 INSHRM
diversity+inclusion=innovation 2014 INSHRMdiversity+inclusion=innovation 2014 INSHRM
diversity+inclusion=innovation 2014 INSHRMJoe Gerstandt
 
Transforming your Organizational Culture (Omaha Young Professionals)
Transforming your Organizational Culture (Omaha Young Professionals)Transforming your Organizational Culture (Omaha Young Professionals)
Transforming your Organizational Culture (Omaha Young Professionals)Joe Gerstandt
 
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture (workb...
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture (workb...Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture (workb...
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture (workb...Joe Gerstandt
 
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture Joe Gerstandt
 
Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 5 Next Practices (SHRM 2014)
Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 5 Next Practices (SHRM 2014)Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 5 Next Practices (SHRM 2014)
Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 5 Next Practices (SHRM 2014)Joe Gerstandt
 
FORWARD St Paul Sept 2nd D&I Workshop
FORWARD St Paul Sept 2nd D&I WorkshopFORWARD St Paul Sept 2nd D&I Workshop
FORWARD St Paul Sept 2nd D&I WorkshopJoe Gerstandt
 

Más de Joe Gerstandt (20)

Inclusion by Design (2016 SHR Diversity Conference) joe gerstandt
Inclusion by Design (2016 SHR Diversity Conference)   joe gerstandtInclusion by Design (2016 SHR Diversity Conference)   joe gerstandt
Inclusion by Design (2016 SHR Diversity Conference) joe gerstandt
 
Got Bias? (Oregon D&I Conference) joe gerstandt
Got Bias? (Oregon D&I Conference) joe gerstandtGot Bias? (Oregon D&I Conference) joe gerstandt
Got Bias? (Oregon D&I Conference) joe gerstandt
 
Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
 
Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
 
The Inclusive Employee Experience - joe gerstandt
The Inclusive Employee Experience - joe gerstandtThe Inclusive Employee Experience - joe gerstandt
The Inclusive Employee Experience - joe gerstandt
 
The Authenticity Advantage SHRM Atlanta 2016 joe gerstandt
The Authenticity Advantage SHRM Atlanta 2016   joe gerstandtThe Authenticity Advantage SHRM Atlanta 2016   joe gerstandt
The Authenticity Advantage SHRM Atlanta 2016 joe gerstandt
 
joe gerstandt The Future of Diversity and Inclusion (SHRM 2015)
joe gerstandt The Future of Diversity and Inclusion (SHRM 2015)joe gerstandt The Future of Diversity and Inclusion (SHRM 2015)
joe gerstandt The Future of Diversity and Inclusion (SHRM 2015)
 
Future of Diversity and Inclusion 4 Next Practices (HRAM 2015)
Future of Diversity and Inclusion  4 Next Practices (HRAM 2015)Future of Diversity and Inclusion  4 Next Practices (HRAM 2015)
Future of Diversity and Inclusion 4 Next Practices (HRAM 2015)
 
Flying your Freak Flag 2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
Flying your Freak Flag   2015 Forum on Workplace InclusionFlying your Freak Flag   2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
Flying your Freak Flag 2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
 
Inclusion by Design | joe gerstandt | 2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
Inclusion by Design |  joe gerstandt | 2015 Forum on Workplace InclusionInclusion by Design |  joe gerstandt | 2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
Inclusion by Design | joe gerstandt | 2015 Forum on Workplace Inclusion
 
Inclusion by Design (ASAE Great Ideas 2015)
Inclusion by Design (ASAE Great Ideas 2015)Inclusion by Design (ASAE Great Ideas 2015)
Inclusion by Design (ASAE Great Ideas 2015)
 
The Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 4 Next Practices (2014 Bahamas HRDA Co...
The Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 4 Next Practices (2014 Bahamas HRDA Co...The Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 4 Next Practices (2014 Bahamas HRDA Co...
The Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 4 Next Practices (2014 Bahamas HRDA Co...
 
Doing Conflict Well joe gerstandt #SHRMDiv
Doing Conflict Well joe gerstandt #SHRMDivDoing Conflict Well joe gerstandt #SHRMDiv
Doing Conflict Well joe gerstandt #SHRMDiv
 
Flying your Freak Flag (Kansas SHRM 2014)
Flying your Freak Flag (Kansas SHRM 2014)Flying your Freak Flag (Kansas SHRM 2014)
Flying your Freak Flag (Kansas SHRM 2014)
 
diversity+inclusion=innovation 2014 INSHRM
diversity+inclusion=innovation 2014 INSHRMdiversity+inclusion=innovation 2014 INSHRM
diversity+inclusion=innovation 2014 INSHRM
 
Transforming your Organizational Culture (Omaha Young Professionals)
Transforming your Organizational Culture (Omaha Young Professionals)Transforming your Organizational Culture (Omaha Young Professionals)
Transforming your Organizational Culture (Omaha Young Professionals)
 
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture (workb...
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture (workb...Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture (workb...
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture (workb...
 
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture
Culture Builder Bootcamp: Building an Inclusive Organizational Culture
 
Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 5 Next Practices (SHRM 2014)
Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 5 Next Practices (SHRM 2014)Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 5 Next Practices (SHRM 2014)
Future of Diversity and Inclusion: 5 Next Practices (SHRM 2014)
 
FORWARD St Paul Sept 2nd D&I Workshop
FORWARD St Paul Sept 2nd D&I WorkshopFORWARD St Paul Sept 2nd D&I Workshop
FORWARD St Paul Sept 2nd D&I Workshop
 

the diversity advantage

  • 1.
  • 2. joegerstandt.com linkedin.com/in/joegerstandt facebook.com/joegerstandt youtube.com/joegerstandt twitter.com/joegerstandt slideshare.net/joeg
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 6. MT engineers MT management
  • 7. MT engineers NASA management MT management
  • 8. MT engineers NASA management MT management
  • 9. MT engineers NASA management MT management
  • 11. MT engineers NASA management MT management
  • 12. NASA management MT management
  • 13. So, how do you do… consider What decision makes it making… 1 - 10 better?
  • 14. We simply decide without thinking much about the decision process. -Jim Nightingale
  • 16. groupthink: mode of thinking that happens when the desire for harmony in a decision-making group overrides a realistic appraisal of alternatives. Group members try to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation of alternative ideas or viewpoints.
  • 17. Group vs. Individual Decision Making groups individuals accuracy speed creativity degree of acceptance efficiency
  • 18. Group vs. Individual Decision Making groups individuals accuracy x speed x creativity x degree of x acceptance efficiency x
  • 19. Group vs. Individual Decision Making groups individuals accuracy x speed x creativity x degree of x acceptance efficiency x
  • 20. What looks like resistance is often a lack of clarity. -Switch, Dan and Chip Heath
  • 22. diversity… difference
  • 23. di·ver·si·ty [dih-vur-si-tee] noun, plural –ties 1.the state or fact of being diverse; difference; unlikeness. 2.variety; multiformity. 3.a point of difference.
  • 24. diversity… difference relational
  • 25.
  • 26. diversity… difference relational takes many forms
  • 27.
  • 28. diversity… difference relational takes many forms disruptive
  • 29. ↑diversity = ↑variance in performance groups with more diversity perform better or worse than groups with less diversity
  • 30. difference makes a difference… • “we vs. they” mentality • stereotyping • in-group favoritism • inter-group conflict • satisfaction, performance, turnover all get worse
  • 31. inclusion: The actions that we take to include additional difference in a process or group. • fairness of employment practices • openness to difference • inclusion in decision making • integration of networks • balanced outcomes
  • 32. inclusion: The actions that we take to include additional difference in a process or group. • fairness of employment practices • openness to difference • inclusion in decision making • integration of networks • balanced outcomes
  • 33. inclusion: The actions that we take to include additional difference in a process or group. • fairness of employment practices • openness to difference • inclusion in decision making • integration of networks • balanced outcomes
  • 34. inclusion: The actions that we take to include additional difference in a process or group. • fairness of employment practices • openness to difference • inclusion in decision making • integration of networks • balanced outcomes
  • 35. inclusion: The actions that we take to include additional difference in a process or group. • fairness of employment practices • openness to difference • inclusion in decision making • integration of networks • balanced outcomes
  • 36. inclusion: The actions that we take to include additional difference in a process or group. • fairness of employment practices • openness to difference • inclusion in decision making • integration of networks • balanced outcomes
  • 38. inclusion: “…being at home…” “…belonging…” “…able to bring my whole self to work…” “…feeling that my unique contribution was valued…” “…my perspective is always considered…” “…I have a say in what happens…”
  • 39. identity diversity: Differences in our social identities. cognitive diversity: Differences in how we think and solve problems.
  • 40. d i i d v e e n r t s i i t t y y
  • 41. cognitive diversity The extent to which the group reflects differences in knowledge, including beliefs, preferences and perspectives. -Miller, et al (1998) Strategic Management Journal
  • 42. analytical risk taker rational creative realistic flexible factual synthesizer logical conceptual definitive intuitive persistent passionate planner cooperative organized empathetic disciplined expressive detailed harmonizing practical responsive -Ned Herrmann
  • 43. Cerebral Mode (abstract & intellectual thought) ANALYZE STRATEGIZE Joys Joys Solving technical problems Conceptualizing Analyzing complex issues Innovating Logical approach Seeing the big picture Frustrations Frustrations Interpersonal aspects of situations Routine Meetings Ice breakers Details Right Mode Socializing in meetings Structure Left Mode Joys Joys Implementing ideas Expressing ideas Developing plans Understanding group dynamics Follow-up and completion Team building Frustrations Frustrations “Blue Sky” thinking Logic ahead of feelings Not following the rules No interaction with people ORGANIZE PERSONALIZE Limbic Mode (concrete and emotional processing)
  • 44. analytical risk taker rational creative realistic flexible factual synthesizer logical conceptual definitive intuitive persistent passionate planner cooperative organized empathetic disciplined expressive detailed harmonizing practical responsive
  • 45. analytical risk taker rational creative realistic flexible factual synthesizer logical conceptual definitive intuitive potential persistent passionate planner cooperative organized empathetic disciplined expressive detailed harmonizing practical responsive
  • 46. analytical risk taker rational creative realistic flexible factual synthesizer logical conceptual definitive intuitive tension persistent passionate planner cooperative organized empathetic disciplined expressive detailed harmonizing practical responsive
  • 47.
  • 48. share information quality decision making creative problem solving innovation fully utilize talent develop new relationships manage relationships
  • 49. The Social Origin of Good Ideas -Ronald Burt, University of Chicago Teams with greater training and experiential diversity introduce more innovations. “Management Team Tenure and Organizational Outcomes” Finkelstein, Hambrick (1999) Administrative Science Quarterly & “Management and Innovation” Bantel, Jackson (2002) Strategic Management Journal
  • 50. share information quality decision making creative problem solving innovation fully utilize talent develop new relationships manage relationships
  • 51. Where do good ideas come from? That is simple…from differences. Creativity comes from unlikely juxtapositions. The best way to maximize differences is to mix ages, cultures and disciplines. -Nicolas Negroponte, founder MIT Media Lab
  • 53. team #1 MBA Harvard University 100 people
  • 54. team #1 MBA Harvard University 100 people team #2
  • 55. team #1 MBA Harvard University 100 people team #2
  • 56. team #1 friends with cognitive benefits MBA Harvard University 100 people team #2
  • 57.
  • 58. These theorems that when solving problems, diversity can trump ability and that when making predictions diversity matters just as much as ability are not political statements. They are mathematical truths. -Scott Page
  • 60. team #1 This team greatly overrates its own problem solving capacity.
  • 61. This team greatly underrates its problem solving capacity. team #2
  • 62. Taking it back… What does this mean for your organization What needs Where will ? to happen? you start?
  • 63. What’s in the toolbox? •perspectives •heuristics
  • 64. perspectives Perspectives are ways of representing situations and problems, how we organize knowledge.
  • 65. what do you see?
  • 66.
  • 67. Do you seek out other perspectives? peers other departments customers other organizations other professions
  • 68. heuristics Heuristics are ways of generating solutions. Heuristics can vary in their sophistication, and they can be immediate reactions to situations or simple rules of thumb.
  • 69. …if you do not know the answer, choose “C”
  • 70. please add these numbers…
  • 71. please add these numbers… 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 =
  • 72. please add these numbers… 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 = 55
  • 73. please add these numbers… 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 = 55 …but how did you do it?
  • 74. Draw a 9 dot matrix on a blank paper …
  • 75.
  • 76. Draw a 9 dot matrix on a blank paper … Without lifting your pencil from the paper, draw exactly four straight, connected lines that will go through all nine dots, but through each dot only once.
  • 77.
  • 78.
  • 79.
  • 80.
  • 81. “…given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.” -Eric Raymond (Linus’ Law)
  • 82. so… perspectives are how we see things (problems and opportunities) heuristics are how we approach or solve them
  • 83.
  • 84. who how
  • 85.
  • 87. dysfunctional dysfunctional agreement disagreement
  • 88.
  • 90. dysfunctional dysfunctional dysfunctional agreement agreement disagreement
  • 91. always disagree lack of trust dysfunctional dysfunctional dysfunctional agreement agreement disagreement us vs. them personal conflict
  • 92. always always agree lack of disagree lack of honesty trust dysfunctional dysfunctional dysfunctional agreement agreement disagreement avoid us vs. conflict meeting them personal after the conflict meeting
  • 93. dysfunctional dysfunctional dysfunctionalsweet agreement disagreement agreement spot
  • 94. Groups often fail to outperform individuals because they prematurely move to consensus, with dissenting opinions being suppressed or dismissed. -Hackman, Morris (1975) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  • 96. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 97. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 98. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 99. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 100. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 101. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them & they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 102. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 103. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 104. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 105. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 106.
  • 108. If everyone is thinking the same thing, someone isn’t thinking at all. -George S. Patton
  • 109. share difference & commonality explicit agreements inquiry vs. advocacy solutions vs. problems empathy i & we vs. them and they make space for novelty learn from failure meta conversations
  • 110. • triaging / identifying different kinds of decisions • unanimity, democracy, consensus, boss
  • 111. Group vs. Individual Decision Making groups individuals accuracy x speed x creativity x degree of x acceptance efficiency x
  • 112.
  • 113.
  • 115.
  • 116. brain basics 1.threat vs. reward 2.efficiency
  • 117.
  • 118. brain basics 1.threat vs. reward 2.efficiency 3.pattern recognition
  • 119.
  • 120.
  • 121.
  • 122.
  • 123. when the brain locks onto a pattern, it does not seek alternative
  • 124. stereotype An idea or image; a mental framework that contains our knowledge, beliefs, expectations and feelings about a social group. Stereotypes allow for no individuality.
  • 125. stereotype waitress librarian
  • 126. smoke bowl eat hamburgers
  • 127. smoke knit bowl wear glasses eat hamburgers eat salad
  • 128. confirmation bias Our tendency to search for or interpret new information in a way that confirms preconceptions and avoids information and interpretations which contradict prior beliefs.
  • 129. fundamental attribution error An unjustified tendency to assume that a person’s actions depend on what kind of person that person is rather than on the social environmental forces influencing the person.
  • 130.
  • 131. consider this… …a long time ago, in a far away galaxy, there was a man named Uri Treisman…
  • 132. consider this… 1.Lack of Adequate Preparation 2.Socio-economic Status 3.Lack of Family Support 4.Lack of Motivation
  • 133. consider this… 1.Lack of Adequate Preparation 2.Socio-economic Status 3.Lack of Family Support 4.Lack of Motivation
  • 134. consider this… 1.Lack of Adequate Preparation 2.Socio-economic Status 3.Lack of Family Support 4.Lack of Motivation
  • 135. consider this… 1.Lack of Adequate Preparation 2.Socio-economic Status 3.Lack of Family Support 4.Lack of Motivation
  • 136. consider this… 1.Lack of Adequate Preparation 2.Socio-economic Status 3.Lack of Family Support 4.Lack of Motivation
  • 137.
  • 139. consider this… 1.Power of Assumptions 2.Intentions vs. Outcomes
  • 140. consider this… 1.Power of Assumptions 2.Intentions vs. Outcomes 3.Power of Stereotypes
  • 141. consider this… 1.Power of Assumptions 2.Intentions vs. Outcomes 3.Power of Stereotypes 4.Problem is “out there”
  • 142.
  • 143.
  • 144. how
  • 145. high low difference difference high learning celebration growth reinforcement interaction self-organization energy stress low productivity conflict wasted energy exhaustion factions low reflection comfort safety belonging interaction clearing the decks rest and recovery isolation boredom misunderstanding stagnation Difference Matrix Glenda Eoyang HSDI frustration death
  • 146. high low difference difference high learning celebration growth reinforcement interaction self-organization energy stress low productivity conflict wasted energy exhaustion factions low reflection comfort safety belonging interaction clearing the decks rest and recovery isolation boredom misunderstanding stagnation Difference Matrix Glenda Eoyang HSDI frustration death
  • 147. high low difference difference high learning celebration growth reinforcement interaction self-organization energy stress low productivity conflict wasted energy exhaustion factions low reflection comfort safety belonging interaction clearing the decks rest and recovery isolation boredom misunderstanding stagnation Difference Matrix Glenda Eoyang HSDI frustration death
  • 148. high low difference difference high learning celebration growth reinforcement interaction self-organization energy stress low productivity conflict wasted energy exhaustion factions low reflection comfort safety belonging interaction clearing the decks rest and recovery isolation boredom misunderstanding stagnation Difference Matrix Glenda Eoyang HSDI frustration death
  • 149. high low difference difference high learning celebration growth reinforcement interaction self-organization energy stress low productivity conflict wasted energy exhaustion factions low reflection comfort safety belonging interaction clearing the decks rest and recovery isolation boredom misunderstanding stagnation Difference Matrix Glenda Eoyang HSDI frustration death
  • 150. high low difference difference high move to low difference: move to low Tell a joke. interaction: interaction State a shared value or Stop communicating. belief. Leave the area. Share personal experience. Explain yourself. Pick a low difference topic. Pick a low communication topic. low move to high move to high interaction: difference: interaction Ask a question. Amplify little Use another medium. differences Listen more. Play devils advocate Pick a high communication Pick a high difference Difference Matrix topic. topic Glenda Eoyang HSDI
  • 151.
  • 152.
  • 153.
  • 154.
  • 155.
  • 156.
  • 157.
  • 158.
  • 159. doing inclusion work to have a beginners mind
  • 160. doing inclusion listen actively
  • 161. doing inclusion ask good open ended questions
  • 166. doing inclusion build your discomfort muscles
  • 167. doing inclusion work to have a beginners mind
  • 168. who
  • 169. social network analysis From time to time people discuss important matters with other people. Looking back over the past six months, who are the people with whom you discussed matters important to you?
  • 170. social network analysis Consider the people you communicate with in order to get your work done. Of all the people you have communicated with during the last six months, who has been the most important for getting your work done?
  • 171. social network analysis Consider an important project or initiative that you are involved in. Consider the people who would be influential for getting it approved or obtaining the resources you need. Who would you talk to, to get the support you need?
  • 172. social network analysis Who do you socialize with? (spending time with people after work hours, visiting one another at home, going to social events, out for meals and so on) Over the last 6 months, who are the main people with whom you have socialized informally?
  • 173. analysis • group • proximity • expertise • hierarchy • gender • age • race • ethnicity
  • 174. analysis • group What do you have? • proximity What do you have a • expertise lot of? • hierarchy • gender What do you not • age have? • race What do you need to • ethnicity do differently?
  • 175. Who do you discuss new ideas with? Who do you turn to for help? Who do you get the most valuable information from? Who do you trust to keep your best interests in mind?
  • 176.
  • 177.
  • 178.
  • 179.
  • 180. consider a ten person team 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
  • 181. 1 2 7 3 10 4 8 6 9 5
  • 182. 1 2 7 3 10 4 8 6 9 5 …flow of information?
  • 183. 1 2 7 3 10 4 8 6 9 5 …influence?
  • 184. 1 2 7 3 10 4 8 6 9 5 …inclusion?
  • 185.
  • 186.
  • 187. other ideas for mixing it up… • social technology • solution & idea contests • open space, appreciative inquiry, etc. • mix up assignment, teams, spaces • more social • communities of practice
  • 188. www.joegerstandt.com joe.gerstandt@gmail.com www.twitter.com/joegerstandt www.linkedin.com/in/joegerstandt www.facebook.com/joegerstandt 402.740.7081
  • 189. resources • The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies | Scott Page • The Wisdom of Crowds | James Surowiecki • A Whole New Mind | Daniel Pink • The Medici Effect | Frans Johansson • The Geography of Thought | Richard Nisbett
  • 190. resources • Achieving Success Through Social Capital: Tapping Hidden Resources in Your Personal and Business Network | Wayne E. Baker • The Whole Brain Business Book Ned Herrmann • Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force | Jeffrey Pfeffer