This document summarizes a user needs assessment being conducted by John Kaye of the British Library to identify major user groups and their characteristics and needs in using a new UK data service platform (USP). The assessment will analyze literature, web analytics, and conduct interviews. It will identify key user groups like academic researchers, educators, and policymakers. It will also analyze topics, disciplines, and locations of resource use to develop use scenarios and recommendations to inform the design of the USP.
2. Overview
Timescales, aims, approach and outcomes
Proposed Report Structure
Identifying the Users
Initial Findings – User Behaviour
Initial Findings – Disciplines and Topics
Data to be collected & Analysed
Questions and Discussion
3. Timescales & aims
First Draft February 2013, Final April 2013
Identify the potential major user groups of the USP
and outline their characteristics.
Examine their goals, purposes, and objectives in
using the USP:
what do users want to accomplish?
what are their overall aims?
how can the USP help to accomplish these aims?
4. Approach & Desired
Outcomes
Desk based analysis and literature review based on
existing data sources
The main outcomes of this report will be:
A review of the current situation
Typical user groups and their characteristics and aims
A set of use scenarios to aid the design of the USP
Recommendations for the design of the USP
Recommendations for future research
5. Proposed Report
Structure
Introduction (scope, method and context)
Who are the users?
Current Situation
Location type and use of resources
Disciplines and topics trends
Other initiatives
User Group Needs
Needs for Academic Researchers
Undergraduate
Postgraduate
Career
Needs for Educational Teachers (School and University)
Needs for Policy Makers
Needs for Funders
Use Scenarios
Recommendations
6. Identifying the
Users
The Cohort Studies and their outputs have a range
of potential users, they are used in academic
research, teaching and as evidence in forming policy
in the public sector.
Academic research: Undergrad, Postgrad, Doctoral,
Post-Doc, Academic, non-institutional researchers
Educational Teaching: School, Undergrad, Quant
skills
Funders: ESRC/MRC
Policy: Education, Health, Social, Central Govt,
Organisational Policy (NHS, LEA etc.)
7. Identifying the
Users
Government department (policy) users include (From Longitudinal
Champions):
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Department for Communities and Local Government
Department for Education
Department for International Development
Department for transport
Department of Health
Department for Work and Pensions
Food standards Agency
Government Equalities Office
Home Office
Ministry of Defence/Defence Analytical Services and Advice
Ministry of Justice
Office for National Statistics
Scottish Government
Welsh Government
8. Identifying the
Users
3 categories of web users search needs:
Navigational search, the immediate intent is to
reach a particular site (e.g., ESDS Homepage);
Informational search, the intent is to acquire some
information likely to be contained in one or more
web pages (e.g., cohort studies);
Transactional search, the intent is to perform some
web-mediated activity (e.g., download dataset).
9. Initial Findings
User Behaviour
Researchers of Tomorrow: The research
behaviour of Generation Y doctoral students:
“In a survey enquiry asking about their last incident of
information-seeking activity, the majority of all
doctoral students (including Generation Y) across all
subject disciplines were looking for text-based and
secondary, pre-published research resources
(journal articles, books etc) and not primary source
materials.”
10. Initial Findings
User Behaviour
e-journals dominated.
Of the total survey sample, 30% used Google or Google
Scholar as their main source to find their research information
Google sources were strongly favoured above other sources by
arts and humanities, social science and engineering and
computing science students.
Students rarely seemed to be aware of the actual publisher or
e-information source itself when searching for e-journal articles,
for example relying on their libraries’ own e-resource interface
or a Google application to locate and access resources, without
being particularly interested in the names or nature of the
originating organisations..
15. Initial Findings
Topics &Disciplines
Longitudinal Champions Employment
Older People
priorities – Policy users Health and disability
needs: Children/ Families
State Pension reform
Education
Well-being
15 Government Personal w ealth and poverty
departments or bodies Young people
Travel
17 topic areas Social mobility
Food Safety
99 questions Crime
Neighbourhood and housing
Immigration
Sport and Culture
Early years/
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Number of questions
16. Data to be collected
& Analysed
Carry on literature review
Paper abstract analysis from CLS bibliography
CLS web views, search, download statistics
MRC web views, search, download statistics
ESRC DTC new PhD subjects
HALCyon cross cohort analysis
Biobank Search Terms
BL catalogue and web search data
BL ‘Explore’ user needs analysis
Referral sources e.g. wikipedia
Govt. Department needs via UKDF
……and anything else we can find!
17. Questions &
Discussion
John Kaye – Lead Curator Digital Social Sciences
The British Library
96 Euston Road
London NW1 2DB
john.kaye@bl.uk
Twitter: @johnkayebl
Telephone: 020 7412 7450
Blog: http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/socialscience/
Notas del editor
In this presentation I will be talking about the user needs assessment related to the USP this study will look at who the users are, what they are interested in and what they may require from the USP
The presentation will cover the following areas and I welcome your feedback, either during the presentation or a discussion at the end.
This study will hopefully inform the priorities of the USP and feed into requirements for design elements and priorities for topic based activities such as data harmonisation.
Academic researchers need to be split by discipline e.g. bio-medical and social sciences Funders have a different use for this and will want to be able to identify any gaps to fund and to look at the impact of work etc.
It’s important to think about the needs to each group or subset in a group. E.g government department policy person may want to carry out an informational search, whilst a government researcher or statistician may need a transactional search.
This finding has implications for CLOSER as if it wants to highlight primary source materials and improve re-use it may need to use secondary sources as a ‘hook’ to lure researchers in.
This also has implications for CLOSER as if it is shut off as a stand alone resource it may be missed by generation Y students. CLOSER resources will need to appear in google results and library catalogues to obtain maximum exposure; open metadata will help here Confirmed in JISC - Digital information seekers: How academic libraries can support the use of digital resources
Here’s me carrying out an informational search on google It would be good to see what information surveys or other organisations have. ESDS have provided some information, CLS are working on it and er’re going to have a look at BL search terms.
Other info from ESDS Longitudinal shows that they’ve 45,013 in ? Period Jack? Popular Longitudinal resources are BHPS and NCDS
In terms of dataset downloads, put against some of ESDS other surveys, CLOSER surveys had lower rates with understanding society top with nearly 700 downloads in nearly a year and 3/4
The priorities outlined by these departments seem to have a strong focus on current government priorities around social welfare reform More analysis is available for each department’s needs As part of the BL’s role on the UK Data Forum I have asked for more information from several government departments including DWP, DfE and ONS.
It’s still early days and Sarah and I are currently gathering information for the Impact and user needs reports. Some of our immediate priorities for data and information sources are