SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 17
Cumulative Increases in Health Insurance Premiums,
                Workers’ Contributions to Premiums, Inflation, and
                          Workers’ Earnings, 1999-2011




Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health
Benefits, 1999-2011. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer
Price Index, U.S. City Average of Annual Inflation (April to
April), 1999-2011; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Seasonally
Adjusted Data from the Current Employment Statistics Survey,
1999-2011 (April to April).
Average Annual Premiums for Single and Family
                                   Coverage, 1999-2011




* Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05).
Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011.
Average Annual Worker Premium Contributions Paid by
       Covered Workers for Single and Family Coverage, 1999-2011




*Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05).
Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011.
Average Annual Worker Premium Contributions and Total
      Premiums for Covered Workers, Single and Family Coverage, by
                            Firm Size, 2011




                                      Single Coverage   Family Coverage


* Estimates are statistically different between All
Small Firms and All Large Firms (p<.05).
Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-
Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.
Percentage of Covered Workers with No Premium Contribution
     or a Contribution of Greater than 50% of the Premium, 2011




                                   Single Coverage                           Family Coverage

*Estimate is statistically different between All Small Firms and All Large
Firms within category (p<.05).

Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits,
2011.
Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered
                              Workers, by Plan Type, 1988-2011




                    1%
                    1%
                    1%
                    1%



* Distribution is statistically different from the previous year shown (p<.05). No statistical tests were conducted for years
prior to 1999. No statistical tests are conducted between 2005 and 2006 due to the addition of HDHP/SO as a new plan type
in 2006.
Note: Information was not obtained for POS plans in 1988. A portion of the change in plan type enrollment for 2005 is likely
attributable to incorporating more recent Census Bureau estimates of the number of state and local government workers
and removing federal workers from the weights. See the Survey Design and Methods section from the 2005 Kaiser/HRET
Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits for additional information.
Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored
Health Benefits, 1993, 1996; The Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA), 1988.
Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage That
                Offer an HDHP/SO, by Firm Size, 2005-2011




* Estimate is statistically different from estimate for previous year shown (p<.05).

‡
 The 2011 estimate includes 1.8% of all firms offering health benefits that offer both
an HDHP/HRA and an HSA-qualified HDHP. The comparable percentages for
previous years are: 2005 [0.3%], 2006 [0.4%], 2007 [0.2%], 2008 [0.3%], 2009
[<0.1%], and 2010 [0.3%].

Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2005-2011.
Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a
            General Annual Deductible of $1,000 or More for Single
                     Coverage, By Firm Size, 2006-2011




* Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05).

Note: These estimates include workers enrolled in HDHP/SO and other plan types. Because we do not collect information on the attributes of
conventional plans, to be conservative, we assumed that workers in conventional plans do not have a deductible of $1,000 or more. Because
of the low enrollment in conventional plans, the impact of this assumption is minimal. Average general annual health plan deductibles for
PPOs, POS plans, and HDHP/SOs are for in-network services.

Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2006-2011.
Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a
           General Annual Deductible of $2,000 or More for Single
                    Coverage, By Firm Size, 2006-2011




* Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05).

Note: These estimates include workers enrolled in HDHP/SO and other plan types. Because we do not collect information on the attributes of
conventional plans, to be conservative, we assumed that workers in conventional plans do not have a deductible of $2,000 or more. Because
of the low enrollment in conventional plans, the impact of this assumption is minimal.

Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2006-2011.
Percentage of All Firms Offering Health Benefits, 1999-2011




*Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05).

Note: Estimates presented in this exhibit are based on the sample of both firms that completed the entire
survey and those that answered just one question about whether they offer health benefits. The percentage of
firms offering health benefits is largely driven by small firms. The large increase in 2010 was primarily driven by
a 12 percentage point increase in offering among firms with 3 to 9 workers. In 2011, 48% of firms with 3 to 9
employees offer health benefits, a level more consistent with levels from recent years other than 2010. The
overall 2011 offer rate is consistent with the long term trend, indicating that the high 2010 offer rate may be an
aberration.
Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011.
Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health
          Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering
                     Retiree Health Benefits, 1988-2011




Note: Tests found no statistical difference from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05). No statistical tests are
conducted for years prior to 1999. Data have been edited to include the less than 1% of large firms who report “yes,
but no retiree” responses in 2011. Historical numbers have been recalculated so that the results are comparable.
Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored
Health Benefits, 1991, 1993, 1995, 1998; The Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA), 1988.
Percentage of Covered Workers in Partially or
                        Completely Self-Funded Plans, 1999-2011




*Tests found no statistical difference from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05). No statistical
tests are conducted for years prior to 1999.

Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011
of
                                                                                                                     Co
                                                                                                                     ve
           Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in Partially or                                                    re
  Completely Self-Insured Plans which Purchase Different Types d
                                                                                                                     W
                             of Stoploss Insurance, by Firm Size, 2011                                               or
                                                                                                                 Pe ke
                                                                                                                 rc rs
                                                                                                                 en En
                                                                                                                 ta rol
                                                                                                                        Av
                                                                                                                 ge le
                                                                                                             Pe         er
                                                                                                                 of d
                                                                                                             rc         ag
                                                                                                                 Co in
                                                                                                             en          e
                                                                                                                 ve a
                                                                                                             ta         Pe
                                                                                                                 re Se
                                                                                                             ge          r
                                                                                                                  d lf-
                                                                                                             of         E
                                                                                                                 W Fu
                                                                                                             Co         m
                                                                                                                 or nd
                                                                                                             ve         pl
                                                                                                                 ke ed
                                                                                                             re         oy
                                                                                                                 rs Pl
                                                                                                      All     d         ee
                                                                                                                 En an
                                                                                                      Large W           Cl
                                                                                                                 rol th
                                                                                                      Firms or          ai
                                                                                                                  le at
                                                                                                       1,00 ke
                                                                                                       5,00
                                                                                                      (200              m
                                                                                                                  d Pu
                                                                                                      or or rs 5
                                                                                                       0
                                                                                                       0-4,9
                                                                                                       200-
                                                                                                       50-1 8            s
                                                                                                                 in rc
                                                                                                      ALL in 7
                                                                                                      More 23 85 8 Co
                                                                                                       More 6
                                                                                                       999 2 5
                                                                                                       99
                                                                                                                  a ha
                                                                                                      FIRM % % 89 st
                                                                                                      Work Pa % 0
                                                                                                       Work % 8 1
                                                                                                             0
                                                                                                                 Se se
                                                                                                      SIZE % % % at
                                                                                                      ers) rti * %
                                                                                                      Sers *
                                                                                                                 lf- s
                                                                                                             96 40 80 20
                                                                                                             79 88 84 13
                                                                                                             50 90 75 $7
                                                                                                             all        30
                                                                                                                        $
                                                                                                                        w
                                                                                                                 Fu St
                                                                                                              * *
                                                                                                              y         1,
                                                                                                                        5,
                                                                                                                        6,
                                                                                                                        3,
                                                                                                                        1
                                                                                                                        2
                                                                                                                        hi
* Estimate is statistically different from estimate for all other firms not in the indicated category            nd op
                                                                                                             or         81
                                                                                                                        21
                                                                                                                        71
                                                                                                                        82
                                                                                                                        9
                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                        ch
(p<.05).                                                                                                         ed lo
                                                                                                             Co         5*
                                                                                                                        0*
                                                                                                                        9*
                                                                                                                        4*
                                                                                                                        9,
                                                                                                                        8,
                                                                                                                        St
                                                                                                                 Pl ss
Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.                                      m          6
                                                                                                                        2
                                                                                                                        op
                                                                                                                 an In
                                                                                                             pl         0
                                                                                                                        8
                                                                                                                        lo
                                                                                                                 th su
Percentage of Firms Offering Family Coverage Who Enrolled
         Adult Children up to 26 Years of Age as Dependents Because
             of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), by Firm Size, 2011




* Estimate is statistically different from estimate for all other firms not in the indicated size (p<.05).
Note: In total, an estimated 2.3 million adult children were enrolled in their parent’s employer sponsored health plan due
to the Affordable Care Act.
Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.
Percentage of Firms and Covered Workers Enrolled in Plans
          Grandfathered under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), by Firm
                                 Size, 2011




*Estimate is statistically different between All Small Firms
and All Large Firms within category (p<.05).

Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored
Health Benefits, 2011.
Among Covered Workers, Changes to Cost Sharing for
        Preventive Services Because of the Affordable Care Act (ACA),
                             by Firm Size, 2011




*Estimate is statistically different between All Small Firms and All Large Firms within category
(p<.05).

Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.
Among Offering Firms with Fewer Than 50 Employees,
          Awareness and Utilization of the Small Employer Tax Credits
            Made Available in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), 2011




Note: The ACA provides a temporary tax credit for small employers with fewer than 25 full-time equivalents that offer health insurance and have average
annual wages of less than $50,000. More information about the tax credit is available at: http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=223666,00.html. Because
our survey asks about the total number of employees in a firm and not full-time equivalents, we could not limit responses to firms only within the size range
eligible for the credit. To ensure that we included employers that may have a number of part-time or temporary employees but could still qualify for the tax
credit, we directed questions to employers with fewer than 50 total employees. This approach allowed us to capture some employers with more than 25 total
employees that would nonetheless be eligible for the tax credit, but it also means that some employers that are unlikely to be eligible for the tax credit were
asked these questions.
§ Note: 87% of the firms who stated that they would not claim the credit in either year believed that they were not
eligible, 10% believed that the credit was too small, and 3% said that claiming the credit was too much of a hassle.
Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.

More Related Content

Similar to 2011 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack

Project on ratio analysis
Project on ratio analysisProject on ratio analysis
Project on ratio analysisRanobir Dey
 
meadwestvaco 3Q 07EarningsSlidesvFINAL102307
 meadwestvaco 3Q 07EarningsSlidesvFINAL102307 meadwestvaco 3Q 07EarningsSlidesvFINAL102307
meadwestvaco 3Q 07EarningsSlidesvFINAL102307finance33
 
Satish mistry comprehensive personal financial plan
Satish mistry   comprehensive personal financial planSatish mistry   comprehensive personal financial plan
Satish mistry comprehensive personal financial planSadique Neelgund
 
2014 Employer Health Benefits Chartpack
2014 Employer Health Benefits Chartpack2014 Employer Health Benefits Chartpack
2014 Employer Health Benefits ChartpackKFF
 
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3finance20
 
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3finance20
 
Business Studies Essay_KPIS Astra Zeneca
Business Studies Essay_KPIS Astra ZenecaBusiness Studies Essay_KPIS Astra Zeneca
Business Studies Essay_KPIS Astra ZenecaManos Mastorakis
 
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CASE STUDIES THESIS SUBM...
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  CASE STUDIES THESIS SUBM...ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  CASE STUDIES THESIS SUBM...
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CASE STUDIES THESIS SUBM...Sheila Sinclair
 
2013 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack
2013 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack2013 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack
2013 Employer Health Benefits Chart PackKFF
 
Kaiser Family Foundation/ Health Research & Educational Trust 2013 Employer H...
Kaiser Family Foundation/ Health Research & Educational Trust 2013 Employer H...Kaiser Family Foundation/ Health Research & Educational Trust 2013 Employer H...
Kaiser Family Foundation/ Health Research & Educational Trust 2013 Employer H...Nathan (Andy) Bostick
 
Oasis Petroleum Inc. Wenjun Wu
Oasis Petroleum Inc. Wenjun WuOasis Petroleum Inc. Wenjun Wu
Oasis Petroleum Inc. Wenjun WuWu Wenjun
 
POS Goes Digital: Evolution of the in Store Shopping Experience
POS Goes Digital: Evolution of the in Store Shopping ExperiencePOS Goes Digital: Evolution of the in Store Shopping Experience
POS Goes Digital: Evolution of the in Store Shopping ExperienceLinda Gridley
 
quest diagnostics Q108script
quest diagnostics Q108scriptquest diagnostics Q108script
quest diagnostics Q108scriptfinance34
 
2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey Chart Pack
2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey Chart Pack2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey Chart Pack
2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey Chart PackKFF
 
IRJET- Financial Strength Analysis of Unitech Company Using Altman’s Z score ...
IRJET- Financial Strength Analysis of Unitech Company Using Altman’s Z score ...IRJET- Financial Strength Analysis of Unitech Company Using Altman’s Z score ...
IRJET- Financial Strength Analysis of Unitech Company Using Altman’s Z score ...IRJET Journal
 

Similar to 2011 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack (18)

Project on ratio analysis
Project on ratio analysisProject on ratio analysis
Project on ratio analysis
 
meadwestvaco 3Q 07EarningsSlidesvFINAL102307
 meadwestvaco 3Q 07EarningsSlidesvFINAL102307 meadwestvaco 3Q 07EarningsSlidesvFINAL102307
meadwestvaco 3Q 07EarningsSlidesvFINAL102307
 
Flow chart
Flow chartFlow chart
Flow chart
 
Satish mistry comprehensive personal financial plan
Satish mistry   comprehensive personal financial planSatish mistry   comprehensive personal financial plan
Satish mistry comprehensive personal financial plan
 
2014 Employer Health Benefits Chartpack
2014 Employer Health Benefits Chartpack2014 Employer Health Benefits Chartpack
2014 Employer Health Benefits Chartpack
 
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
 
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
PEG_031506MorganStanley_3
 
Business Studies Essay_KPIS Astra Zeneca
Business Studies Essay_KPIS Astra ZenecaBusiness Studies Essay_KPIS Astra Zeneca
Business Studies Essay_KPIS Astra Zeneca
 
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CASE STUDIES THESIS SUBM...
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  CASE STUDIES THESIS SUBM...ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  CASE STUDIES THESIS SUBM...
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CASE STUDIES THESIS SUBM...
 
The Art of Budgeting
The Art of BudgetingThe Art of Budgeting
The Art of Budgeting
 
2013 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack
2013 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack2013 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack
2013 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack
 
Kaiser Family Foundation/ Health Research & Educational Trust 2013 Employer H...
Kaiser Family Foundation/ Health Research & Educational Trust 2013 Employer H...Kaiser Family Foundation/ Health Research & Educational Trust 2013 Employer H...
Kaiser Family Foundation/ Health Research & Educational Trust 2013 Employer H...
 
Oasis Petroleum Inc. Wenjun Wu
Oasis Petroleum Inc. Wenjun WuOasis Petroleum Inc. Wenjun Wu
Oasis Petroleum Inc. Wenjun Wu
 
POS Goes Digital: Evolution of the in Store Shopping Experience
POS Goes Digital: Evolution of the in Store Shopping ExperiencePOS Goes Digital: Evolution of the in Store Shopping Experience
POS Goes Digital: Evolution of the in Store Shopping Experience
 
quest diagnostics Q108script
quest diagnostics Q108scriptquest diagnostics Q108script
quest diagnostics Q108script
 
Tnc Presentation#1
Tnc Presentation#1Tnc Presentation#1
Tnc Presentation#1
 
2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey Chart Pack
2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey Chart Pack2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey Chart Pack
2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey Chart Pack
 
IRJET- Financial Strength Analysis of Unitech Company Using Altman’s Z score ...
IRJET- Financial Strength Analysis of Unitech Company Using Altman’s Z score ...IRJET- Financial Strength Analysis of Unitech Company Using Altman’s Z score ...
IRJET- Financial Strength Analysis of Unitech Company Using Altman’s Z score ...
 

More from jpwlinkedin

10th Annual Study Of Employee Benefit Trends
10th Annual Study Of Employee Benefit Trends10th Annual Study Of Employee Benefit Trends
10th Annual Study Of Employee Benefit Trendsjpwlinkedin
 
Health Care Reform October 2012 Update
Health Care Reform October 2012 UpdateHealth Care Reform October 2012 Update
Health Care Reform October 2012 Updatejpwlinkedin
 
Exercising At Your Desk
Exercising At Your DeskExercising At Your Desk
Exercising At Your Deskjpwlinkedin
 
Implementation Of The Minimum Medical Loss Ratio
Implementation Of The Minimum Medical Loss RatioImplementation Of The Minimum Medical Loss Ratio
Implementation Of The Minimum Medical Loss Ratiojpwlinkedin
 
Making The Premium Tax Credits Work
Making The Premium Tax Credits WorkMaking The Premium Tax Credits Work
Making The Premium Tax Credits Workjpwlinkedin
 
How To Make Wellness Programs Work For Consumers
How To Make Wellness Programs Work For ConsumersHow To Make Wellness Programs Work For Consumers
How To Make Wellness Programs Work For Consumersjpwlinkedin
 
Weight Loss: A Side-Effect Of A Healthy Lifestyle
Weight Loss: A Side-Effect Of A Healthy LifestyleWeight Loss: A Side-Effect Of A Healthy Lifestyle
Weight Loss: A Side-Effect Of A Healthy Lifestylejpwlinkedin
 
The Rest Of The Good Nutrition Lineup
The Rest Of The Good Nutrition LineupThe Rest Of The Good Nutrition Lineup
The Rest Of The Good Nutrition Lineupjpwlinkedin
 
I-Don\'t-Care-Itis: The Most Common Health Problem In America
I-Don\'t-Care-Itis: The Most Common Health Problem In AmericaI-Don\'t-Care-Itis: The Most Common Health Problem In America
I-Don\'t-Care-Itis: The Most Common Health Problem In Americajpwlinkedin
 
Health Care Reform Implementation For Employers
Health Care Reform Implementation For EmployersHealth Care Reform Implementation For Employers
Health Care Reform Implementation For Employersjpwlinkedin
 
The U.S. Congress and Health Policy
The U.S. Congress and Health PolicyThe U.S. Congress and Health Policy
The U.S. Congress and Health Policyjpwlinkedin
 
Health Reform: An Overview
Health Reform: An OverviewHealth Reform: An Overview
Health Reform: An Overviewjpwlinkedin
 

More from jpwlinkedin (12)

10th Annual Study Of Employee Benefit Trends
10th Annual Study Of Employee Benefit Trends10th Annual Study Of Employee Benefit Trends
10th Annual Study Of Employee Benefit Trends
 
Health Care Reform October 2012 Update
Health Care Reform October 2012 UpdateHealth Care Reform October 2012 Update
Health Care Reform October 2012 Update
 
Exercising At Your Desk
Exercising At Your DeskExercising At Your Desk
Exercising At Your Desk
 
Implementation Of The Minimum Medical Loss Ratio
Implementation Of The Minimum Medical Loss RatioImplementation Of The Minimum Medical Loss Ratio
Implementation Of The Minimum Medical Loss Ratio
 
Making The Premium Tax Credits Work
Making The Premium Tax Credits WorkMaking The Premium Tax Credits Work
Making The Premium Tax Credits Work
 
How To Make Wellness Programs Work For Consumers
How To Make Wellness Programs Work For ConsumersHow To Make Wellness Programs Work For Consumers
How To Make Wellness Programs Work For Consumers
 
Weight Loss: A Side-Effect Of A Healthy Lifestyle
Weight Loss: A Side-Effect Of A Healthy LifestyleWeight Loss: A Side-Effect Of A Healthy Lifestyle
Weight Loss: A Side-Effect Of A Healthy Lifestyle
 
The Rest Of The Good Nutrition Lineup
The Rest Of The Good Nutrition LineupThe Rest Of The Good Nutrition Lineup
The Rest Of The Good Nutrition Lineup
 
I-Don\'t-Care-Itis: The Most Common Health Problem In America
I-Don\'t-Care-Itis: The Most Common Health Problem In AmericaI-Don\'t-Care-Itis: The Most Common Health Problem In America
I-Don\'t-Care-Itis: The Most Common Health Problem In America
 
Health Care Reform Implementation For Employers
Health Care Reform Implementation For EmployersHealth Care Reform Implementation For Employers
Health Care Reform Implementation For Employers
 
The U.S. Congress and Health Policy
The U.S. Congress and Health PolicyThe U.S. Congress and Health Policy
The U.S. Congress and Health Policy
 
Health Reform: An Overview
Health Reform: An OverviewHealth Reform: An Overview
Health Reform: An Overview
 

2011 Employer Health Benefits Chart Pack

  • 1. Cumulative Increases in Health Insurance Premiums, Workers’ Contributions to Premiums, Inflation, and Workers’ Earnings, 1999-2011 Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, U.S. City Average of Annual Inflation (April to April), 1999-2011; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Seasonally Adjusted Data from the Current Employment Statistics Survey, 1999-2011 (April to April).
  • 2. Average Annual Premiums for Single and Family Coverage, 1999-2011 * Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05). Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011.
  • 3. Average Annual Worker Premium Contributions Paid by Covered Workers for Single and Family Coverage, 1999-2011 *Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05). Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011.
  • 4. Average Annual Worker Premium Contributions and Total Premiums for Covered Workers, Single and Family Coverage, by Firm Size, 2011 Single Coverage Family Coverage * Estimates are statistically different between All Small Firms and All Large Firms (p<.05). Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer- Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.
  • 5. Percentage of Covered Workers with No Premium Contribution or a Contribution of Greater than 50% of the Premium, 2011 Single Coverage Family Coverage *Estimate is statistically different between All Small Firms and All Large Firms within category (p<.05). Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.
  • 6. Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type, 1988-2011 1% 1% 1% 1% * Distribution is statistically different from the previous year shown (p<.05). No statistical tests were conducted for years prior to 1999. No statistical tests are conducted between 2005 and 2006 due to the addition of HDHP/SO as a new plan type in 2006. Note: Information was not obtained for POS plans in 1988. A portion of the change in plan type enrollment for 2005 is likely attributable to incorporating more recent Census Bureau estimates of the number of state and local government workers and removing federal workers from the weights. See the Survey Design and Methods section from the 2005 Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits for additional information. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1993, 1996; The Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA), 1988.
  • 7. Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage That Offer an HDHP/SO, by Firm Size, 2005-2011 * Estimate is statistically different from estimate for previous year shown (p<.05). ‡ The 2011 estimate includes 1.8% of all firms offering health benefits that offer both an HDHP/HRA and an HSA-qualified HDHP. The comparable percentages for previous years are: 2005 [0.3%], 2006 [0.4%], 2007 [0.2%], 2008 [0.3%], 2009 [<0.1%], and 2010 [0.3%]. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2005-2011.
  • 8. Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $1,000 or More for Single Coverage, By Firm Size, 2006-2011 * Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05). Note: These estimates include workers enrolled in HDHP/SO and other plan types. Because we do not collect information on the attributes of conventional plans, to be conservative, we assumed that workers in conventional plans do not have a deductible of $1,000 or more. Because of the low enrollment in conventional plans, the impact of this assumption is minimal. Average general annual health plan deductibles for PPOs, POS plans, and HDHP/SOs are for in-network services. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2006-2011.
  • 9. Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $2,000 or More for Single Coverage, By Firm Size, 2006-2011 * Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05). Note: These estimates include workers enrolled in HDHP/SO and other plan types. Because we do not collect information on the attributes of conventional plans, to be conservative, we assumed that workers in conventional plans do not have a deductible of $2,000 or more. Because of the low enrollment in conventional plans, the impact of this assumption is minimal. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2006-2011.
  • 10. Percentage of All Firms Offering Health Benefits, 1999-2011 *Estimate is statistically different from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05). Note: Estimates presented in this exhibit are based on the sample of both firms that completed the entire survey and those that answered just one question about whether they offer health benefits. The percentage of firms offering health benefits is largely driven by small firms. The large increase in 2010 was primarily driven by a 12 percentage point increase in offering among firms with 3 to 9 workers. In 2011, 48% of firms with 3 to 9 employees offer health benefits, a level more consistent with levels from recent years other than 2010. The overall 2011 offer rate is consistent with the long term trend, indicating that the high 2010 offer rate may be an aberration. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011.
  • 11. Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits, 1988-2011 Note: Tests found no statistical difference from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05). No statistical tests are conducted for years prior to 1999. Data have been edited to include the less than 1% of large firms who report “yes, but no retiree” responses in 2011. Historical numbers have been recalculated so that the results are comparable. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1991, 1993, 1995, 1998; The Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA), 1988.
  • 12. Percentage of Covered Workers in Partially or Completely Self-Funded Plans, 1999-2011 *Tests found no statistical difference from estimate for the previous year shown (p<.05). No statistical tests are conducted for years prior to 1999. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999-2011
  • 13. of Co ve Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in Partially or re Completely Self-Insured Plans which Purchase Different Types d W of Stoploss Insurance, by Firm Size, 2011 or Pe ke rc rs en En ta rol Av ge le Pe er of d rc ag Co in en e ve a ta Pe re Se ge r d lf- of E W Fu Co m or nd ve pl ke ed re oy rs Pl All d ee En an Large W Cl rol th Firms or ai le at 1,00 ke 5,00 (200 m d Pu or or rs 5 0 0-4,9 200- 50-1 8 s in rc ALL in 7 More 23 85 8 Co More 6 999 2 5 99 a ha FIRM % % 89 st Work Pa % 0 Work % 8 1 0 Se se SIZE % % % at ers) rti * % Sers * lf- s 96 40 80 20 79 88 84 13 50 90 75 $7 all 30 $ w Fu St * * y 1, 5, 6, 3, 1 2 hi * Estimate is statistically different from estimate for all other firms not in the indicated category nd op or 81 21 71 82 9 0 ch (p<.05). ed lo Co 5* 0* 9* 4* 9, 8, St Pl ss Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011. m 6 2 op an In pl 0 8 lo th su
  • 14. Percentage of Firms Offering Family Coverage Who Enrolled Adult Children up to 26 Years of Age as Dependents Because of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), by Firm Size, 2011 * Estimate is statistically different from estimate for all other firms not in the indicated size (p<.05). Note: In total, an estimated 2.3 million adult children were enrolled in their parent’s employer sponsored health plan due to the Affordable Care Act. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.
  • 15. Percentage of Firms and Covered Workers Enrolled in Plans Grandfathered under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), by Firm Size, 2011 *Estimate is statistically different between All Small Firms and All Large Firms within category (p<.05). Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.
  • 16. Among Covered Workers, Changes to Cost Sharing for Preventive Services Because of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), by Firm Size, 2011 *Estimate is statistically different between All Small Firms and All Large Firms within category (p<.05). Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.
  • 17. Among Offering Firms with Fewer Than 50 Employees, Awareness and Utilization of the Small Employer Tax Credits Made Available in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), 2011 Note: The ACA provides a temporary tax credit for small employers with fewer than 25 full-time equivalents that offer health insurance and have average annual wages of less than $50,000. More information about the tax credit is available at: http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=223666,00.html. Because our survey asks about the total number of employees in a firm and not full-time equivalents, we could not limit responses to firms only within the size range eligible for the credit. To ensure that we included employers that may have a number of part-time or temporary employees but could still qualify for the tax credit, we directed questions to employers with fewer than 50 total employees. This approach allowed us to capture some employers with more than 25 total employees that would nonetheless be eligible for the tax credit, but it also means that some employers that are unlikely to be eligible for the tax credit were asked these questions. § Note: 87% of the firms who stated that they would not claim the credit in either year believed that they were not eligible, 10% believed that the credit was too small, and 3% said that claiming the credit was too much of a hassle. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 2011.