Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Session 14 ic2011 tibbets
1. The Lacey Act and its Implications
for the Forest Products Industry
Ashlee Tibbets
Oregon State University
2. General Introduction
• What is illegal logging?
• Why should we care?
• How has it impacted the United States?
• What has been done globally?
• What has the United States done?
2
3. General Introduction
“Illegal logging, associated trade and corruption
increase environmental degradation, biodiversity
loss, and deforestation and hence climate systems.
Illegal logging also damages the livelihoods in the
poorest countries, causes loss of revenues to
governments, distorts markets and trade and
sustains conflicts.”
-Leaders of world’s largest consumer
countries (EIA 2007)
3
4. Roadmap of this presentation
Research Objectives
Illegal Logging
Lacey Act
Preliminary Results
Plans for the Future
4
6. Research Objectives: Secondary
Enhance understanding regarding how forest
products wholesalers in the U.S. view and comply
with the Lacey Act
Enhance understanding regarding how managers
see the present and future implications of the
Lacey Act.
Unveil possible communication shortcomings
between the U.S. government and companies
6
7. Illegal Logging backdrop
Illegal deforestation and forest degradation
contributes: (INECE 2010)
1/5 GHG emissions
Habitat destruction
Biodiversity loss
Billions of dollars of government revenue
7
8. Illegal Logging backdrop
Export-oriented illegal logging
Does not benefit communities or
governments who should be benefiting (EIA
2007)
Estimated $15 billion annual loss to
developing countries (World Bank 2006)
Supply and Demand
8
9. Lacey Act: Inclusion of plants
1900
Originally intended to protect the interests of
agriculture, horticulture, forestry, or to wildlife
or the wildlife resources of the U.S. (FWS 2009)
In 2008, the terms “plant” and “plant product”
were added to the protected species list
Excludes common food crops and scientific specimens
of plant material (e.g. genetic alterations)
9
10. Lacey Act: Enforcement
4 government bodies
Fish and Wildlife Service
Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
U.S. Customs
Homeland Security
10
11. Lacey Act: U.S. Forest Products
Industry
1. Prohibits trade in illegally sourced material
2. Requires documentation
- Country of origin
- Species name
- Quantity and value
3. Establishes penalties
- Forfeiture of goods
- Fines
- Jail
11
12. Lacey Act: Illegality and Due Care
Illegalities Due Diligence
• Theft of plants Intended to encourage log
• Taking plants from buyers to ask questions of
protected areas their suppliers in order to
• Taking plants without reinforce the idea that the U.S.
authorization is no longer interested in
buying illegally sourced wood
• Failure to pay products.
royalties/taxes associated
• Disregard export laws (such
as log-export bans) Different due diligence
program for every company
12
13. Research Methods
• Online questionnaire was sent to members of
the Portland Wholesale Lumber Association
(PWLA) and the North American Wholesale
Lumber Association (NAWLA).
• Over 500 questionnaire were sent
– 80 bad emails
– Total questionnaires returned: 35
13
16. Preliminary Results: Lacey Basics
70% well-versed in environmental policy
20% well-versed in the Lacey Act
-Respondents failed the knowledge questions
Could indicate
• Inadequately communicated
• Respondent was not the Lacey expert
16
18. Preliminary Results: Questions
20% use official government resources
Others include: international shipping agencies,
personal contacts, internet searches
Could indicate
• Subpar usability of websites
• Business aren’t aware of resources
18
20. Preliminary Results: Due Diligence
Variety of answers
-honest middlemen
-visit country of origin
-personal resources
Compliance does not equal competitiveness
Could indicate
• How to market compliance
• General public doesn’t appreciate compliance
20
22. Preliminary Results: Global
81% “steps should be taken to stop illegal
logging”
88% “compliance with the Lacey Act will not
affect illegal logging”
Could indicate
•Misunderstand the Lacey Act
•Lacey Act is missing a key element
22
23. Preliminary Results: Global
60% “compliance with the Lacey Act will not be
beneficial for the United States”
66% “the 2008 amendments were unnecessary”
100% “the amendments were inadequately
communicated to them”
Could indicate
•Policy makers need a better communication system
•Education
23