SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 84
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Domestic Violence, Stalking,
and Rape In Kansas
As Reported by Law Enforcement Agencies

2012
Prepared by:
Kansas Bureau of Investigation
Kirk D. Thompson, Director
1620 SW Tyler
Topeka, Kansas 66612
785.296.8200
This project was supported by Grant Award No. 2011-WF-AX-0036, awarded to the
State of Kansas by the Federal Office on Violence Against Women, Office of Justice
Programs, U. S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of
the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U. S.
Department of Justice or the Office of the Kansas Governor. This grant is administered by the Governor’s Grants Program.

2
Table of Contents
Introduction

.

.

.

.

4

Domestic Violence .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Kansas Domestic Violence Incident and Arrest Trend, 1992 - 2012 .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

.
.

.
.

.
.

6
7

Kansas Domestic Violence Homicide Trend, 1992 - 2012 .

.

.

.

.

.

.

8

Murder, Victim / Suspect Relationship, By Age, Sex, and Race

.

.

.

.

10

Domestic Violence Crime Clock . .

.

.

.

.

12

Kansas Reported Domestic Violence Incidents by Agency, 2010 - 2012 .

.

.

13

Domestic Violence, Victim/Offender Characteristics .

.

.

.

.

.

.

32

Domestic Violence, Relationship of Victim to Offender

.

.

.

.

.

.

33

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Domestic Violence, Location of Incident

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

34

.

.

.

.

.

35

Domestic Violence, Weapon Used .

.

.

.

.

.

Domestic Violence, Type of Injury .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

36

Domestic Violence, Day of Occurrence, Chart and Graph .

.

.

.

.

.

37

Domestic Violence, Twenty-Four Hour Trend, Chart and Graph

.

.

.

.

38

Domestic Violence, Statute Violations .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

39

Protection From Abuse Orders .
.
.
.
Number of Filings Trend Graph, 1994 - 2012

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

42
42

Number of Filings by County, 1996 - 2012 .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

43

Reported Violations of Protection of Abuse by County

.

.

.

.

.

.

47

Protection From Stalking Act
.
.
.
.
Number of Filings Trend Graph 2002-2012 .

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

48
48

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

49

Stalking . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Number of Violations Reported to Law Enforcement

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

50
50

Number of Court Filings by County .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

51

Stalking, Relationship of Victim to Offender .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

52

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

53

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

54

Stalking, Twenty-Four Hour Trend, Chart and Graph .

.

.

.

.

.

.

55

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

56
57

Stalking, Victim/Offender Characteristics
.

Stalking, Location of Incident

.

.

Stalking, Day of Occurrence, Chart and Graph

Rape .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Kansas Rape Trend, 1992- 2012, Chart and Graph

.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

58

Kansas Reported Rape Incidents by Agency, 2010 - 2012 .

.

.

.

.

.

59

Rape, Victim / Offender Characteristics .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

77

Rape, Relationship of Victim to Offender

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

78

Rape, Location of Incident .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

79

Rape, Weapon Used .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

80

Rape, Type of Injury. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

81

Rape, Day of Occurrence, Chart and Graph .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

82

Rape, Twenty-Four Hour Trend, Chart and Graph

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

83

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

84

Rape Crime Clock

Resources For Victims . .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
3
Introduction
Governor Sam Brownback’s office administers the Federal S.T.O.P. Violence
Against Women Act grant program and provides grant funds to the Kansas Bureau of
Investigation (KBI) to facilitate the data entry of the Kansas Standard Offense Reports
and the Kansas Standard Arrest Reports relating to crimes of domestic violence and
rape. This report is based on 2012 statistical data as submitted by Kansas law enforcement agencies. This report is intended to assist agencies in strengthening the criminal
justice system which holds offenders accountable for their actions and provides resources to help respond to these crimes.
The KBI compiled the following report on domestic violence, stalking and rape
statistics for 2012. The data represents the truest and most accurate information
available, reflecting domestic violence and rape as reported by law enforcement agencies through the Kansas Incident Based Reporting System (KIBRS). This system enables crime information from standard offense and arrest reports to be obtained manually, electronically and directly from Kansas law enforcement agencies.
This report does not claim to represent all domestic violence incidents, stalking
offenses, or rapes committed throughout the State of Kansas, as it is dependent on victims to report crimes to law enforcement agencies and for these agencies to submit
incident reports to the KBI. Only domestic violence, stalking, and rape incident and
arrest reports that were submitted to the KBI were counted for this report.
Since 1992, all Kansas law enforcement agencies have been required to make
mandatory arrests for domestic violence incidents when there is probable cause that a
crime was committed. Officers also are required to fill out a KIBRS report for every
domestic violence incident, whether or not an arrest was made. Each law enforcement
agency is required to have a written policy describing its protocol for addressing domestic violence incidents.
Effective in July of 2011, the state legislature passed a bill creating a universal
definition for domestic violence incidents. This definition is to be used by all Kansas
law enforcement agencies. The new definition can be found on page 6 of this publication.
OFFENSES
The domestic violence section of this report includes, but is not limited to, offenses that involve: murder, assault, aggravated assault, assault on a law enforcement officer, aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer, battery, aggravated battery,
battery on a law enforcement officer, aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer,
rape, theft, unlawful deprivation of property, burglary and aggravated burglary. The
statutes listed in the report may not include all domestic violence related crimes, but
do include the majority.

4
Introduction
DUAL ARRESTS
The domestic violence section of this report includes “dual arrests” which refers to
cases where more than one person was arrested for the same domestic violence incident.
In a number of cases, this is the result of an incident where the primary aggressor cannot
be determined so both parties involved are arrested. There also may be a number of cases in which multiple arrests were made at the incident because a third party may have
intervened. Because of this “dual arrest” procedure, some agencies have reported more
arrests than incidents in a particular year. By factoring in dual arrests, a more accurate
arrest percentage can be reported.
TABLES AND GRAPHS
Several tables and graphs regarding domestic violence, stalking, and rape crimes, as
well as victim and offenders, are included in this report. Some domestic violence,
stalking, and rape incidents may have had more than one offense, victim, offender, type
of weapon, or victim-offender relationship. Some KIBRS reports were not filled out
completely, making detailed information on the incident unknown or unavailable. With
this in mind, not all totals for each section will always match.
In order to present the most accurate representation of domestic violence, stalking,
and rape, without misinterpreting the data, the information for this report was recorded
as it was reported to the KBI by law enforcement agencies as of June 30, 2013.
Hopefully law enforcement agencies, domestic violence programs and sexual assault
centers across the State of Kansas will work together to develop effective policies, procedures and training activities to assist those involved in responding to the crimes of
domestic violence, stalking, and rape.
AGENCIES NOT REPORTING COMPLETE DATA
If an agency does not submit any data a “DNR” is indicated. If an agency does not
report complete data, the data is included but the agency is flagged to recognize this discrepancy. This change will more accurately depict the true activity within each agency
and county. Data is listed as questionable when a large decline in submissions occurs
without confirmation by the local agency.

5
Domestic Violence
In 1991, the Kansas Legislature enacted mandates that required all Kansas law enforcement
agencies to adopt written policies regarding their procedures for responding to domestic violence
incidents within their jurisdictions. Each law enforcement policy must include a directive that officers who have probable cause that a crime was committed at a domestic violence incident “shall
make an arrest.” All standard offense reports were required to be submitted to the Kansas Bureau
of Investigation (KBI) beginning in January 1992, whether or not an arrest was made. Since this
legislative action, Kansas law enforcement agencies have increased arrest rates for domestic violence related crimes from 37.09 percent in 1992 to 54.1 percent in 2012.
Victim and offender characteristics for domestic violence have not changed drastically. Still,
the average victim is a white female between the ages of 20 and 24. The average offender is a
white male between the ages of 20 and 29 and is most often the spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend of
the victim. Saturdays and Sundays are the two days when domestic violence incidents are most
likely to occur. While most incidents occur between the hours of midnight and 4:00 a.m.
Domestic violence can be defined as any verbal and/or physical abuse ranging from simple
assault to murder. More than 55 percent of all domestic violence incidents involve the criminal
offense of battery. Battery is defined as “intentionally or recklessly causing bodily harm to another person or intentionally causing physical contact with another person when done in a rude, insulting or angry manner.” In 2001, the Kansas Legislature enacted the “domestic battery” statute
which is “(1) intentionally or recklessly causing bodily harm by a family or household member
against a family or household member; or (2) intentionally causing physical contact with a family
or household member by a family or household member when done in a rude, insulting or angry
manner.”
Most domestic violence offenders use some type of bodily force against their victims and most
use their hands, fists, or feet as personal weapons. An incident of domestic violence most often
occurs at home. Almost half (47.6 percent) of all victims receive physical injuries severe enough
to cause visible abrasions.
"Domestic violence" means an act or threatened act of violence against a person with whom
the offender is involved or has been involved in a dating relationship, or an act or threatened act of
violence against a family or household member by a family or household member. Domestic violence also includes any other crime committed against a person or against property, or any municipal ordinance violation against a person or against property, when directed against a person with
whom the offender is involved or has been involved in a dating relationship or when directed
against a family or household member by a family or household member. For the purposes of this
definition:
(1) "Dating relationship" means a social relationship of a romantic nature. In addition to any other
factors the court deems relevant, the trier of fact may consider the following when making a determination of whether a relationship exists or existed: Nature of the relationship, length of time the
relationship existed, frequency of interaction between the parties and time since termination of the
relationship, if applicable.
(2) "Family or household member" means persons 18 years of age or older who are spouses, former spouses, parents or stepparents and children or stepchildren, and persons who are presently
residing together or have resided together in the past, and persons who have a child in common
regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time. Family or household member also includes a man and woman if the woman is pregnant and the man is alleged to be
the father, regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time.

6
Kansas Domestic Violence
Incident and Arrest Trend
YEAR

NUMBER
OF
INCIDENTS

PERCENT
OF
CHANGE

1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012

20,817
16,690
18,775
20,183
19,653
19,159
18,966
20,901
23,236
19,870
22,434
18,287
18,042
19,222
23,077
22,429
21,500
23,864
23,828
24,159
24,373

INCIDENTS
PER / 1,000
POPULATION

NA
-19.8%
12.5%
7.5%
-2.6%
-2.5%
-1.0%
10.2%
11.2%
-14.5%
12.9%
-18.5%
-1.3%
6.5%
20.1%
- 2.8%
- 4.1%
11.0%
- 0.2%
1.4%
0.9%

NUMBER
OF INCIDENTS
WITH ARRESTS

8.3
6.6
7.4
7.9
7.6
7.4
7.2
8.0
8.6
7.4
8.3
6.7
6.7
7.0
8.4
8.1
7.7
8.5
8.3
8.2
8.2

7,721
10,971
10,408
10,740
10,366
11,083
10,958
10,958
15,136
11,406
11,474
10,373
9,833
10,951
11,754
11,423
11,887
12,584
14,194
13,478
13,193

30,000

25,000

20,000
Inc id en ts

15,000

C le are d b y Arre st

10,000

5,000

0
1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

Year

7

2006

2008

2010

2012
Kansas Domestic Violence
Homicide Trend
Since 1992, Kansas law enforcement agencies have been required to submit a standard offense report to the
KBI on domestic violence incidents whether or not an arrest was made. The intent of the law is to collect information and respond to domestic violence among adult intimates and adult family members. The following chart indicates the number of domestic violence homicides that occurred in Kansas between
1992 - 2012. The victims included are spouses, former spouses, persons in intimate relationships
whether on-going or in the past, and persons 18 years of age or older who are blood or step-related
to one another.
Starting in 1999, only adults who have been killed in a domestic violence situation are reported
in this statistical information. Cases involving children are reviewed by the State Child Death Review Board (SCDRB) and statistical information can be found in the SCDRB report at
www.ksag.org.
Due to technical issues, 1995 data has been omitted because it only contains six months of data.
Total homicide data are not available for 1999.

YEAR

DV-Homicides

Annual Percent
of Change

Incident per 1,000
Population

1992

27

NA

0.01

122

22.13%

1993

41

51.9%

0.02

188

21.81%

1994

34

-17.1%

0.01

171

19.88%

1996

22

-35.3%

0.01

159

13.84%

1997

22

0.0%

0.01

150

14.67%

1998

26

18.2%

0.01

172

15.12%

1999

22

-15.4%

0.01

NA

NA

2000

26

18.2%

0.01

156

16.67%

2001

15

-42.3%

0.01

142

10.56%

2002

18

20.0%

0.01

106

16.98%

2003

15

-16.7%

0.01

121

12.40%

2004

25

66.7%

0.01

122

20.49%

2005

21

-16.0%

0.01

107

19.63%

2006

21

0.0%

0.01

123

17.07%

2007

17

-19.0%

0.01

115

14.78%

2008

19

11.8%

0.01

128

14.84%

2009

35

84.2%

0.01

130

26.92%

2010

32

-8.6%

0.01

105

30.5%

2011

28

-12.5%

0.01

116

24.1%

2012

24

-14.3%

0.01

91

26.4%

8

Total Homicides

Percent DV
Related
Kansas Domestic Violence
Homicide Trend Charts
Domestic Violence Homicides
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

41
35

34
27

26 26

28

25

22 22
15

18

24

21 21
15

32

17

19

Percent of Homicides DV Related
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%

9
10

M

M

F

F

F

F

F

F

W

W

H

W

W

B

B

W

M

F

W

M

F

F

F

F

M

M

F

F

M

M

F

M

F

W

Victim
Sex

Victim
Race

B

B

W

W

W

W

B

W

H

W

A

W

W

W

78

77

61

38

51

34

38

38

49

41

22

48

39

41

31

41

43

52

29

35

35

66

27

56

Victim
Age

Grandparent

Grandparent

Spouse

Spouse

Sibling

Spouse

Girlfriend

In-Law

Girlfriend

Spouse

Girlfriend

Spouse

Girlfriend

Sibling

Boyfriend

Girlfriend

Girlfriend

Spouse

Girlfriend

Spouse

Girlfriend

Parent of Ex-GF

Boyfriend

Ex-Spouse

Victim
Relationship

Handgun

Handgun

Knife

Handgun

Firearm

Handgun

Blunt Object

Handgun

Handgun

Rifle

Handgun

Handgun

Personal

Knife

Firearm

Handgun

Handgun

Asphyxiation

Personal

Asphyxiation

Knife

Firearm

Motor Vehicle

Handgun

Weapons
Used

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Other Circumstance

Other Circumstance

Argument

Argument

Other Felony

Argument

Argument

Unknown

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Argument

Circumstances

W

W

W

A

W

H

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

B

W

W

B

B

B

H

H

W

W

W

Suspect
Race

M

M

M

F

M

M

M

M

F

M

M

M

M

M

F

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

F

M

39

39

55

37

56

32

41

29

21

42

26

55

44

50

Unknown

47

44

57

38

37

39

32

23

58

Suspect Sex Suspect
Age

Domestic Violence Homicides
Relationship, Age, Sex, Race 2012

Sedgwick

Sedgwick

Sedgwick

Sedgwick

Johnson

Shawnee

Sedgwick

Wyandotte

Montgomery

Reno

Shawnee

Johnson

Johnson

Shawnee

Barber

Sedgwick

Wyandotte

Shawnee

Wyandotte

Johnson

Sedgwick

Leavenworth

Sedgwick

Johnson

County
11

15

Male

10
8
2
4

Spouse (inc Ex and Common Law)

Immediate Family (parent/child/sib)

Other

Spouse/Ex
33%

Boyfriend/Girlfriend

BF/GF
42%

Im Family
21%

Other
4%

Victim’s Relationship Was

9

Female

Female
63%

Male
37%

Victim: Male/Female

15

Personal (Hands, Fist, Feet)

2

4

Firearm
62%

Personal (Hands, Fist, Feet)

Personal
8%

4

20

3

Knife
13%

Weapon Used

Argument
83%

Knife

Firearms

Other
17%

Other

Argument

O ther
1 7%

Circumstances

Hispanic
8%

5
2

Victim’s Age

Black
21%

30s
33%

6

8

3

3

40s
25%

4

50-59

40-49

30-39

20-29

50s
13%

Other

20s
12%

1

White

Other
17%

16

Hispanic

Black

White
67%

Asian
4%

Race/Ethnicity

Domestic Violence Homicides
Relationship, Age, Sex, Race 2012

Over 59
Domestic Violence
Crime Clock 2012

One
Domestic Violence
Murder Occurred
every 15.0 Days

One
Domestic Violence
Incident Occurred
Every 21 Minutes,
36 Seconds

Law Enforcement
Made One Domestic
Violence Arrest
Every 39 Minutes,
48 Seconds

These crime clocks should be viewed with care. Being the most aggregate representation of crime data, it is designed to convey the
annual crime experience by showing the relative frequency of occurrence of crime incident. This mode of display should not be
taken to imply a regularity in the commission of these incidents; rather, it represents the annual ratio of crime to fixed time intervals.

12
13

0

County Total

155

127

Fort Scott PD

County Total

28

Bourbon County SO

318

1

23

Hoisington PD

Claflin PD

263

Great Bend PD

3

4

27

Ellinwood PD

Barton County SO

County Total

27

59

44

15

190

1

15

156

2

16

11

7

19

Medicine Lodge PD

3

5

Kiowa PD

1

72

3

109

60

12

27

DNR

14

13

112

0

86

4

22

3

3

0

12

0

1

11

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

2

1

4

DNR

1

3

12

0

11

0

1

36.1%

32.3%

53.6%

56.0%

100.0%

60.9%

55.1%

50.0%

59.3%

40.7%

36.8%

60.0%

33.3%

63.3%

61.1%

78.6%

56.1%

DNR

59.1%

52.6%

84.0%

NA

90.4%

80.0%

67.7%

DNR

24

11

192

176

76

55

46
130

21

295

2

8
2

152
25

15

15

13

9

0

4

66

52

220

20

28

27

23

0

4

86

69

14

44

17

35

DNR

30

14

0
166

0

103

10

53

3

2

1

24

0

2

17

3

2

0

0

0

0

6

3

3

4

DNR

2

2

26

0

11

0

15

41.5%

40.8%

43.5%

56.9%

100.0%

24.0%

61.4%

60.0%

46.4%

48.1%

39.1%

NA

100.0%

70.5%

73.3%

64.7%

70.5%

DNR

73.3%

64.3%

88.6%

NA

92.9%

90.9%

79.2%

178

124

54

400

3

36

317

7

37

4

DNR

1

3

61

44

17

55

0

44

11

203

0

125

13

65

79

56

23

246

2

22

200

1

21

1

DNR

0

1

39

33

6

59

0

47

12

195

0

135

12

48

2011 2011 Dual 2011 Arrest
2010
2010
Arrests
Arrests Percentage Incidents Arrests

158

99

11

48

2012 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests
Arrests Percentage Incidents

Barber County SO

County Total

95

Atchison PD

41

14

County Total

DNR

Atchison County SO 3

2

22

Colony PD

Garnett PD

119

19

County Total

83

5

31

2012
Incidents

Anderson County SO

Moran PD

Iola PD

Humboldt PD

Allen County SO

Reporting Agency

10

8

2

49

0

0

45

0

4

0

DNR

0

0

1

1

0

13

0

11

2

27

0

19

1

7

38.8%

38.7%

38.9%

49.3%

66.7%

61.1%

48.9%

14.3%

45.9%

25.0%

DNR

0.0%

33.3%

62.3%

72.7%

35.3%

83.6%

NA

81.8%

90.9%

82.8%

NA

92.8%

84.6%

63.1%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
14

County Total

5

1

County Total

4

Cheyenne County SO

117

St Francis PD

County Total

28

Baxter Springs PD
DNR

29

Galena PD

Weir PD 2

20

14

Columbus PD

County Total

1

40

3

2

11

6

6

Cherokee County SO

Cedar Vale PD

Sedan PD 3

Chautauqua County SO

Chase County SO

354

2

Rose Hill PD

Benton PD

11

Andover PD

2

32

El Dorado PD

Leon PD 3

74
162

Augusta PD

71

Butler County SO

County Total

27

Horton PD
83

36

Hiawatha PD

County Total

20

2012
Incidents

Brown County SO

Reporting Agency

2

0

2

87

DNR

29

21

16

21

12

1

1

10

6

6

282

2

2

13

21

152

47

45

71

27

35

9

2012
Arrests

1

0

1

5

DNR

3

2

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

34

0

0

3

1

20

8

2

8

4

3

1

20.0%

0.0%

25.0%

70.1%

DNR

92.9%

65.5%

80.0%

52.5%

78.6%

100.0%

50.0%

81.8%

100.0%

100.0%

70.1%

100.0%

100.0%

90.9%

62.5%

81.5%

52.7%

60.6%

75.9%

85.2%

88.9%

40.0%

14

10

11

0

10

27

97

69

2

1

9

6

6

2

0

2

166

DNR

48

43

12

0

0

0

138

DNR

48

37

11

42

11

63

12

2

1

8

7

7

276

2
383

2

2

11

48

115

101

71

58

104

45

16

21

0

0

0

10

DNR

3

5

1

1

1

0

0

1

0

0

19

0

0

1

1

5

9

3

8

2

0

6

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

31

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

0.0%

NA

0.0%

77.1%

DNR

93.8%

74.4%

83.3%

65.1%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

85.7%

85.7%

66.8%

100.0%

0.0%

72.7%

54.2%

80.0%

59.4%

65.4%

63.8%

75.0%

90.9%

48.4%

3

1

2

165

1

34

42

17

71

8

3

0

5

2

2

376

4

DNR

13

32

125

98

104

41

DNR

18

23

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

0

0

0

115

1

33

27

12

43

7

3

0

4

2

2

282

3

DNR

11

27

119

49

73

30

DNR

16

14

2010
Arrests

0

0

0

7

0

3

2

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

41

0

DNR

2

4

20

8

7

2

DNR

0

2

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

66.1%

100.0%

88.2%

59.5%

70.6%

57.7%

87.5%

100.0%

NA

80.0%

100.0%

100.0%

64.1%

75.0%

DNR

69.2%

71.9%

79.2%

41.8%

63.5%

68.3%

DNR

88.9%

52.2%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
15
3

Burden PD

3

369

5

Winfield PD

County Total

89

Arkansas City PD

Udall PD

49
223

Cowley County SO

5

DNR

Protection PD

County Total

DNR

2

Coldwater PD

5

2

Commanche County SO

38

0

Waverly PD

County Total

0

22

Burlington PD

Lebo PD

16

Coffey County SO

92

73

Concordia PD

County Total

19

Cloud County SO

40

1

Wakefield PD 3

County Total

29

Clay Center PD

12

10

County Total

12

2012
Incidents

Clay County SO

Clark County SO

Reporting Agency

257

4

3

57

165

28

4

DNR

DNR

4

36

0

0

21

15

55

43

12

27

0

18

9

10

10

2012
Arrests

19

1

0

3

14

1

0

DNR

DNR

0

2

0

0

0

2

6

6

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

64.5%

100.0%

60.0%

60.7%

67.7%

55.1%

80.0%

DNR

DNR

80.0%

89.5%

NA

NA

95.5%

81.3%

53.3%

50.7%

63.2%

65.0%

0.0%

62.1%

80.0%

83.3%

83.3%

416

0

2

118

266

30

0

DNR

DNR

0

52

0

4

24

24

82

52

30

48

3

31

323

0

3

91

207

22

0

DNR

DNR

0

50

0

4

24

22

50

35

15

33

2

22

9

6

7

14

6

30

0

1

9

19

1

0

DNR

DNR

0

2

0

0

2

0

1

0

1

3

0

2

1

0

0

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

7

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

70.4%

NA

100.0%

69.5%

70.7%

70.0%

NA

DNR

DNR

NA

92.3%

NA

100.0%

91.7%

91.7%

59.8%

67.3%

46.7%

62.5%

66.7%

64.5%

57.1%

85.7%

85.7%

438

3

2

116

261

56

4

DNR

0

4

50

0

3

21

26

58

33

25

51

0

41

10

3

3

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

363

3

2

101

214

43

5

DNR

0

5

55

0

3

25

27

41

20

21

38

0

28

10

3

3

2010
Arrests

42

0

0

17

16

9

1

DNR

0

1

10

0

0

4

6

0

0

0

3

0

2

1

0

0

73.3%

100.0%

100.0%

72.4%

75.9%

60.7%

100.0%

DNR

NA

100.0%

90.0%

NA

100.0%

100.0%

80.8%

70.7%

60.6%

84.0%

68.6%

NA

63.4%

90.0%

100.0%

100.0%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
16

3

153

Pittsburg PD

Frontenac PD

County Total

1

5

902

University of Kansas PD

Lawrence PD

27

42

County Total

10

Douglas County SO

Highland PD

3

1

Troy PD 3

Wathena PD

6
9

Elwood PD

124

Doniphan County SO

County Total

1

4

Chapman PD

3

20

Herington PD

Enterprise PD

62

Abilene PD

6

37

County Total

6

DNR

264

0

DNR

4

Dickinson County SO

Oberlin PD

Decatur County SO 2

Mulberry PD 3

Arcadia PD

2

Pittsburg State University PD

0

30
17

Girard PD

Cherokee PD

9

Arma PD

3

51

2012
Incidents

Crawford County SO

Reporting Agency

4

538

23

26

2

11

1

6

6

107

1

4

21

52

29

2

2

DNR

187

0

DNR

4

0

16

14

8

107

38

2012
Arrests

1

37

0

4

1

2

0

0

1

5

0

0

1

1

3

0

0

DNR

5

0

DNR

0

0

1

0

2

1

1

60.0%

55.5%

54.8%

81.5%

100.0%

90.0%

100.0%

66.7%

83.3%

82.3%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

82.3%

70.3%

33.3%

33.3%

DNR

68.9%

NA

DNR

100.0%

NA

88.2%

46.7%

66.7%

69.3%

72.5%

DNR

249

0

0

0

1

17

13

6

183

29

8

920

35

36

4

13

5

8

6

119

DNR

3

10

78

28

0

9

771

19

27

4

12

0

5

6

100

DNR

3

13

67

17

0

0

0

1

4

1

2

0

1

0

0

1

11

DNR

0

3

5

3

0

0

DNR

14

0

0

0

0

3

0

1

9

1

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

DNR

331

2

1

0

1

16

23

11

225

52

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

100.0%

83.4%

51.4%

69.4%

100.0%

84.6%

0.0%

62.5%

83.3%

74.8%

DNR

100.0%

100.0%

79.5%

50.0%

NA

NA

DNR

71.0%

0.0%

0.0%

NA

100.0%

87.5%

56.5%

45.5%

77.3%

53.8%

8

738

34

37

3

10

4

7

13

101

DNR

13

25

34

29

5

5

DNR

325

5

DNR

0

2

20

33

14

183

68

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

6

407

14

22

2

7

3

3

7

100

DNR

17

27

33

23

4

4

DNR

248

5

DNR

0

1

16

21

9

144

52

2010
Arrests

0

30

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

17

DNR

5

4

5

3

0

0

DNR

6

0

DNR

0

0

0

0

2

3

1

75.0%

51.1%

41.2%

56.8%

66.7%

70.0%

75.0%

42.9%

46.2%

82.2%

DNR

92.3%

92.0%

82.4%

69.0%

80.0%

80.0%

DNR

74.5%

100.0%

DNR

NA

50.0%

80.0%

63.6%

50.0%

77.0%

75.0%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
17

20

9

17

7

DNR

7

8

8

167

County Total

DNR

9

9

9

592

18

9

2012
Arrests

1

Fort Hays State University PD

6

Ellsworth PD

0

Holyrood PD 3

10

Garden City PD

Holcomb PD
239

66
163

Finney County SO

County Total

0

Kanoplis PD

16

1

Wilson PD

3

County Total

9

Ellsworth County SO

235

0

167

68

6

0

0

1

3

2

189

0

3

201

0

5

Ellis PD

Victoria PD 3

County Total

5

172

Hays PD

Ellis County SO

Howard PD

2

Elk County SO

County Total

Edwards County SO

980

20

Eudora PD

County Total

11

2012
Incidents

Baldwin City PD

Douglas County continued

Reporting Agency

21

0

13

8

0

0

0

0

0

0

12

0

0

0

9

3

0

DNR

0

1

1

38

0

0

89.5%

0.0%

94.5%

90.9%

37.5%

NA

NA

100.0%

50.0%

22.2%

88.1%

0.0%

0.0%

100.0%

91.9%

70.0%

77.8%

DNR

77.8%

77.8%

77.8%

56.5%

90.0%

81.8%
13

9

3

2

1

5

3

156

0

0

0

140

1
255

11

65
189

69

9

181

27

0

0
0

0

2

16

9

173

0

5

2

145

16

9

21

5

4

5

13

13

13
13

821

1,016

261

22

0

19

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

13

0

0

0

11

2

0

0

0

0

0

7

0

1

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

39

14

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

89.3%

9.1%

93.9%

89.9%

33.3%

NA

NA

50.0%

31.3%

33.3%

82.7%

NA

0.0%

0.0%

89.0%

66.7%

55.6%

75.0%

40.0%

100.0%

100.0%

80.1%

33.3%

57.1%

264

4

179

81

49

0

DNR

6

20

23

160

0

DNR

5

134

21

11

2

9

7

7

826

32

14

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

293

4

207

82

27

0

DNR

5

10

12

146

0

DNR

2

129

15

8

1

7

7

7

450

14

9

2010
Arrests

34

0

28

6

0

0

DNR

0

0

0

15

0

DNR

0

13

2

0

0

0

0

0

31

0

1

98.1%

100.0%

100.0%

93.8%

55.1%

NA

DNR

83.3%

50.0%

52.2%

81.9%

NA

DNR

40.0%

86.6%

61.9%

72.7%

50.0%

77.8%

100.0%

100.0%

50.7%

43.8%

57.1%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
18

0

County Total

Greeley County SO 3

County Total

1

1

17

0

Montezuma PD

75

17

County Total

68

7

6

Gray County SO

Ulysses PD

Grant County SO

County Total

5

Hill City PD

1

1

County Total

1

Graham County SO

Gove County SO

34

Grandview Plaza PD
539

486

Junction City PD

County Total

19

222

Geary County SO

County Total

9

118

Ottawa PD

Wellsville PD

95

Franklin County SO

356

Spearville PD

County Total

0

310

Dodge City PD

Bucklin PD

46

2012
Incidents

Ford County SO

Reporting Agency

1

1

14

0

14

34

30

4

5

4

1

0

0

352

38

304

10

152

4

89

59

300

0

0

265

35

2012
Arrests

0

0

0

0

0

6

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

14

9

4

1

3

0

2

1

33

0

0

32

1

100.0%

100.0%

82.4%

NA

82.4%

37.3%

35.3%

57.1%

83.3%

80.0%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

62.7%

85.3%

61.7%

47.4%

67.1%

44.4%

73.7%

61.1%

75.0%

NA

NA

75.2%

73.9%

2

2

10

0

10

69

52

17

6

6

0

4

4

549

36

1

1

9

0

9

30

22

8

6

6

0

5

5

347

38

292

17

22
491

121

5

70

46

273

0

0

254

19

0

0

0

0

0

6

4

2

0

0

0

2

2

17

6

10

1

2

0

1

1

31

0

0

30

1

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

196

15

101

80

290

0

0

269

21

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

50.0%

50.0%

90.0%

NA

90.0%

34.8%

34.6%

35.3%

100.0%

100.0%

NA

75.0%

75.0%

60.1%

88.9%

57.4%

72.7%

60.7%

33.3%

68.3%

56.3%

83.4%

NA

NA

83.3%

85.7%

1

1

13

0

13

64

58

6

7

5

2

5

5

604

56

529

19

245

14

131

100

341

0

0

314

27

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

0

0

9

0

9

41

35

6

6

4

2

3

3

434

59

364

11

147

6

81

60

321

0

0

303

18

2010
Arrests

0

0

1

0

1

6

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

29

11

17

1

4

0

2

2

36

0

0

36

0

0.0%

0.0%

61.5%

NA

61.5%

54.7%

50.0%

100.0%

85.7%

80.0%

100.0%

60.0%

60.0%

67.1%

85.7%

65.6%

52.6%

58.4%

42.9%

60.3%

58.0%

83.6%

NA

NA

85.0%

66.7%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
19
4
DNR

Sedgwick PD

2

1

Mayetta PD
71

21

Holton PD

County Total

49

4

4

18

18

315

DNR

Jackson County SO

County Total

Hodgeman County SO

Haskell County SO

Walton PD 2

North Newton PD

County Total

4

Halstead PD

County Total

6

Hesston PD

3

275

Newton PD

Burrton PD

23

27

DNR

Harvey County SO

Harper PD

2

1

14

Anthony PD

Attica PD

12

County Total

0
0

Harper County SO

County Total

Hamilton County SO 3

24

24

Greenwood County SO

County Total

2012
Incidents

Reporting Agency

59

1

21

37

4

4

11

11

211

DNR

1

DNR

5

4

7

176

18

12

DNR

0

6

6

0

0

20

20

2012
Arrests

4

0

1

3

0

0

1

1

27

DNR

0

DNR

2

1

2

20

2

0

DNR

0

0

0

0

0

4

4

77.5%

100.0%

95.2%

69.4%

100.0%

100.0%

55.6%

55.6%

58.4%

DNR

33.3%

DNR

75.0%

75.0%

83.3%

56.7%

69.6%

44.4%

DNR

0.0%

42.9%

50.0%

NA

NA

66.7%

66.7%

10

DNR

0

7

3

DNR

DNR

15

15

DNR

30

30

3

3

DNR

DNR

225

DNR

1

1

8

2

60

DNR

35

46

4

4

DNR

DNR

336

DNR

2

2

6

4

16

186

288
14

11

20

81

7

DNR

2

5

0

0

DNR

DNR

21

DNR

0

0

3

0

2

14

2

1

DNR

0

1

0

DNR

DNR

3

3

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

11

DNR

0

8

3

DNR

DNR

15

15

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

65.4%

DNR

80.0%

54.3%

75.0%

75.0%

DNR

DNR

60.7%

DNR

50.0%

50.0%

83.3%

50.0%

100.0%

59.7%

45.0%

81.8%

DNR

NA

75.0%

100.0%

DNR

DNR

80.0%

80.0%

85

0

36

49

14

14

DNR

DNR

266

DNR

2

DNR

4

3

9

231

17

16

DNR

5

4

7

DNR

DNR

16

16

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

60

0

31

29

6

6

DNR

DNR

192

DNR

0

DNR

4

4

8

164

12

13

DNR

4

3

6

DNR

DNR

14

14

2010
Arrests

7

0

1

6

0

0

DNR

DNR

22

DNR

0

DNR

0

1

1

19

1

1

DNR

0

0

1

DNR

DNR

1

1

62.4%

NA

83.3%

46.9%

42.9%

42.9%

DNR

DNR

63.9%

DNR

0.0%

DNR

100.0%

100.0%

77.8%

62.8%

64.7%

75.0%

DNR

80.0%

75.0%

71.4%

DNR

DNR

81.3%

81.3%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
20

County Total

5

49
43

Prairie Village PD

5

Lake Quivera PD

3

County Total

Johnson County Parks PD

2,899

0

0

3
45

Spring Hill PD

161

0

Mission Hills PD

Gardner PD

Westwood PD

Lenexa PD

3

298
200

Shawnee PD

Roeland Park PD

958

859

37

Overland Park PD 5

Olathe PD

5

Mission PD

113

Merriam PD

5

3
54

Leawood PD

76

DNR

DNR

84

Fairway PD

Johnson County SO

Jewell County SO 2

Perry PD

3

County Total

0

Winchester PD
0

0

Oskaloosa PD

3

4

1,707

0

0

21

3

78

0

120

140

27

51

639

456

19

67

29

0

57

DNR

DNR

45

0

0

0

0

8
0

McLouth PD

Nortonville PD 3

DNR

41

2012
Arrests

0

DNR

76

2012
Incidents

0

Meriden PD

Valley Falls PD

2

Jefferson County SO

Reporting Agency

32

0

0

1

0

1

0

3

2

0

3

18

0

0

0

1

0

3

DNR

DNR

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

DNR

4

57.8%

NA

NA

44.4%

100.0%

47.8%

NA

58.5%

46.3%

62.8%

98.0%

64.8%

53.1%

51.4%

59.3%

51.9%

0.0%

71.1%

DNR

DNR

48.8%

NA

NA

NA

NA

50.0%

NA

DNR

48.7%

2,803

0

1

41

4

138

0

177

294

23

53

848

930

64

88

65

1,708

0

1

33

1

61

0

109

135

16

53

617

492

35

66

39

3

47

71
6

DNR

DNR

58

0

0

1

0

4

1

0

52

85

0

0

4

0

1

0

1

4

1

2

25

40

3

1

2

0

1

DNR

DNR

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

DNR

DNR

108

0

0

1

0

10

1

3

93

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

57.9%

NA

100.0%

70.7%

25.0%

43.5%

NA

61.0%

44.6%

65.2%

96.2%

69.8%

48.6%

50.0%

73.9%

56.9%

50.0%

64.8%

DNR

DNR

48.1%

NA

NA

100.0%

NA

40.0%

100.0%

0.0%

49.5%

2,124

0

0

44

4

174

2

186

364

41

58

972

DNR

59

91

59

1

69

DNR

DNR

121

6

0

0

0

7

0

11

97

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

1,279

0

0

29

3

65

0

125

151

15

53

678

DNR

25

49

32

0

54

DNR

DNR

71

4

0

0

0

4

0

9

54

2010
Arrests

71

0

0

4

0

1

0

7

3

0

5

40

DNR

5

0

1

0

5

DNR

DNR

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

56.9%

NA

NA

56.8%

75.0%

36.8%

0.0%

63.4%

40.7%

36.6%

82.8%

65.6%

DNR

33.9%

53.8%

52.5%

0.0%

71.0%

DNR

DNR

52.9%

66.7%

NA

NA

NA

57.1%

NA

81.8%

48.5%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
21
38
11

Lansing PD

Basehor PD

Lincoln County SO

37

Tonganoxie PD

County Total

8

8

808

612

Leavenworth PD

County Total

110

8

8

Leavenworth County SO

County Total

3

Altamont PD

Lane County SO

11

Chetopa PD

263

9

Oswego PD

County Total

15
225

6

6

39

Parsons PD

County Total

County Total

DNR

Labette County SO

Kiowa County SO

Norwich PD

25

2

14

13

Kingman PD

County Total

13

2012
Incidents

Kingman County SO

Kearny County SO

Reporting Agency

5

5

348

7

22

23

234

62

5

5

161

4

15

7

120

15

2

2

31

DNR

23

8

9

9

2012
Arrests

0

0

22

1

1

3

16

1

0

0

24

1

4

1

16

2

0

0

0

DNR

0

0

1

1

62.5%

62.5%

40.3%

54.5%

55.3%

54.1%

35.6%

55.5%

62.5%

62.5%

52.1%

100.0%

100.0%

66.7%

46.2%

86.7%

33.3%

33.3%

79.5%

DNR

92.0%

57.1%

61.5%

61.5%

2

15

7

9

9

785

13

58

35

549

130

10

1

1

392

4

37

17

266

68

6

6

313

10

164

1

17

8

19
121

30

4

4

26

0

21

5

2

2

0

0

35

0

3

1

30

1

1

1

28

1

2

0

22

3

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

257

4

4

32

0

28

4

5

5

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

11.1%

11.1%

45.5%

30.8%

58.6%

45.7%

43.0%

51.5%

50.0%

50.0%

43.5%

100.0%

76.5%

87.5%

38.5%

53.3%

100.0%

100.0%

78.1%

NA

75.0%

100.0%

40.0%

40.0%

10

10

875

16

99

35

508

217

6

6

380

2

17

8

329

24

5

5

20

1

11

8

DNR

DNR

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

5

5

394

12

45

10

210

117

2

2

114

2

16

9

74

13

3

3

12

0

6

6

DNR

DNR

2010
Arrests

0

0

30

1

2

0

19

8

0

0

11

0

1

2

8

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

DNR

DNR

50.0%

50.0%

41.6%

69.8%

43.4%

28.6%

37.6%

50.2%

33.3%

33.3%

27.1%

100.0%

88.2%

87.5%

20.1%

54.2%

60.0%

60.0%

60.0%

0.0%

54.5%

75.0%

DNR

DNR

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
22

County Total

DNR

38
DNR

22

2012
Arrests

3

2

2012
Incidents

6
0

Inman PD

Canton PD

County Total

0
37

0

Goessel PD

3

Burns PD

Florence PD

4

Peabody PD

3

4
14

Marion PD

12

Hillsboro PD

Marion County SO

6

Moundridge PD

144

5

Lindsborg PD

County Total

113

McPherson PD

163

DNR

14

County Total

McPherson County SO

Americus PD

2

1

137

Emporia PD

Emporia State University PD

25

Lyon County SO

6

5

Oakley PD 3

County Total

1

Logan County SO

60

5
4

La Cygne PD

Linn Valley PD

27

0

0

3

4

10

1

9

92

0

2

5

5

72

8

114

DNR

1

98

15

7

6

1

32

4

3

3

Pleasanton PD

3

Mound City PD

Linn County SO

Reporting Agency

2

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

10

0

0

1

0

9

0

4

DNR

0

4

0

1

1

0

5

0

0

1

DNR

4

67.6%

NA

NA

100.0%

100.0%

64.3%

25.0%

66.7%

56.9%

NA

33.3%

66.7%

100.0%

55.8%

57.1%

67.5%

DNR

100.0%

68.6%

60.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

54.0%

100.0

60.0%

66.7%

DNR

47.4%

DNR

1

48

0

1

4

8

12

7

16

152

2

5

6

4

121

29

0

0

3

7

4

5

10

89

0

0

3

4

73

9

196

14

132

DNR

1

123

8

24
171

10

8

2

18

0

1

DNR

1

16

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

11

0

0

0

0

10

1

13

DNR

0

13

0

2

2

0

0

0

0

DNR

0

0

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

9

6

3

29

0

1

DNR

2

26

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

56.3%

NA

0.0%

75.0%

87.5%

33.3%

71.4%

50.0%

51.3%

0.0%

0.0%

50.0%

100.0%

52.1%

57.1%

60.7%

DNR

100.0%

64.3%

33.3%

88.9%

100.0%

66.7%

62.1%

NA

100.0%

DNR

50.0%

61.5%

53

0

DNR

2

2

23

2

24

135

3

2

7

10

102

11

149

0

3

129

17

19

16

3

34

5

12

5

1

11

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

26

0

DNR

2

2

16

0

6

101

0

2

3

12

72

12

100

0

0

94

6

7

4

3

16

3

8

4

1

0

2010
Arrests

2

0

DNR

0

0

2

0

0

11

0

0

0

2

8

1

5

0

0

5

0

2

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

45.3%

NA

DNR

100.0%

100.0%

60.9%

0.0%

25.0%

66.7%

0.0%

100.0%

42.9%

100.0%

62.7%

100.0%

63.8%

NA

0.0%

69.0%

36.3%

26.3%

18.8%

66.7%

44.1%

60.0%

58.3%

80.0%

100.0%

0.0%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
23

County Total

21

47

Paola PD

6

2

3
13

Council Grove PD

County Total

4

10

3

Morris County SO

5

3

193

County Total

4

64

98

25

36

DNR

31

5

77

3

15

33

26

6

1

5

25

1

DNR

1

15

8

2012
Arrests

307

Caney PD

Cherryvale PD

110

Independence PD

3

27

35

161

County Total

30
DNR

Coffeyville PD

2

5

Montgomery County SO

Cawker City PD

Beloit PD

Mitchell County SO

Louisburg PD
132

6

Osawatomie PD

58

11

Miami County SO

County Total

7
4

Meade County SO

Meade PD

31

1

County Total

DNR

Frankfort PD

Waterville PD

1

2

Blue Rapids PD

17

Marysville PD

3

12

2012
Incidents

Marshall County SO

Reporting Agency

0

0

0

29

1

0

10

16

2

6

DNR

6

0

3

0

1

2

0

0

0

0

1

0

DNR

0

1

0

46.2%

66.7%

40.0%

53.4%

40.0%

75.0%

49.1%

50.9%

85.2%

85.7%

DNR

83.3%

100.0%

56.1%

50.0%

66.7%

66.0%

44.8%

54.5%

25.0%

71.4%

77.4%

100.0%

DNR

100.0%

82.4%

66.7%

16

21

28

10

10

0

11

DNR

DNR

DNR

11

0

3

28

16

12

16

11

5

1
272

2

3

75

159

34

43

0

21

22

376

3

129

198

44

36

0

19

17

68

8
137

0

0

0

53

0

1

14

35

3

8

0

2

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

DNR

DNR

DNR

1

0

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

29

41

59

12

12

0

19

DNR

DNR

DNR

13

6

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

57.1%

68.8%

41.7%

58.2%

50.0%

66.7%

47.3%

62.6%

70.5%

97.2%

NA

100.0%

94.1%

49.6%

37.5%

55.2%

51.2%

47.5%

83.3%

83.3%

NA

52.6%

DNR

DNR

DNR

76.9%

0.0%

24

12

12

280

0

5

66

156

53

33

DNR

27

6

168

10

54

39

65

168

5

13

33

DNR

DNR

2

28

3

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

20

9

11

186

0

4

43

104

35

26

DNR

24

2

85

3

23

19

40

85

1

10

20

DNR

DNR

0

20

0

2010
Arrests

3

1

2

19

0

0

4

14

1

3

DNR

3

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

DNR

DNR

0

0

0

70.8%

66.7%

60.0%

59.6%

NA

80.0%

59.1%

57.7%

64.2%

69.7%

DNR

77.8%

33.3%

50.0%

30.0%

42.6%

46.2%

61.5%

50.0%

20.0%

69.2%

60.6%

DNR

DNR

0.0%

71.4%

0.0%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
24

Scranton PD 3

Overbrook PD

Lyndon PD

3

3

Carbondale PD

79

7

1

4

DNR

5

2

31

Burlingame PD

25

21

4

11

11

Osage City PD

County Total

0
99

31

County Total

County Total

County Total

Osage County SO

Norton PD

Norton County SO

Ness County SO

Erie PD

75

Chanute PD

3

24

33

Neosho County SO

County Total

5

3

Seneca PD

14

Sabetha PD

11

2

9

14

County Total

3

2012
Incidents

Nemaha County SO

Elkhart PD

Morton County SO

Reporting Agency

41

2

0

2

DNR

3

11

23

14

9

5

9

9

58

0

36

22

21

4

9

8

13

4

9

2012
Arrests

1

0

0

0

DNR

0

1

0

1

0

1

2

2

5

0

1

4

0

0

0

0

3

2

1

50.6%

28.6%

0.0%

50.0%

DNR

60.0%

32.3%

74.2%

52.0%

42.9%

100.0%

63.6%

63.6%

53.5%

NA

46.7%

75.0%

63.6%

80.0%

64.3%

57.1%

90.9%

100.0%

88.9%

87

4

2

0

8

0

50

24

36

29

7

4

4

65

0

51

14

32

2

15

15

7

4

3

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

66

2

2

0

5

0

37

20

29

25

4

2

2

42

0

36

6

26

2

13

11

8

5

3

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

2

0

1

1

2

1

1

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

72.7%

50.0%

100.0%

NA

62.5%

NA

70.0%

83.3%

77.8%

82.8%

57.1%

50.0%

50.0%

63.1%

NA

70.6%

35.7%

75.0%

100.0%

80.0%

66.7%

85.7%

100.0%

66.7%

124

2

0

2

8

6

77

29

22

20

2

7

7

93

1

65

27

38

4

18

16

19

9

10

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

63

2

0

2

5

4

25

25

14

12

2

4

4

69

1

54

14

27

2

13

12

14

8

6

2010
Arrests

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

1

1

0

0

0

3

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

48.4%

100.0%

NA

100.0%

62.5%

66.7%

32.5%

75.9%

59.1%

55.0%

100.0%

57.1%

57.1%

71.0%

100.0%

78.5%

51.9%

71.1%

50.0%

72.2%

75.0%

73.7%

88.9%

60.0%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
25

County Total

CB

65

Pratt PD

6

3

Atwood PD

County Total

3

Rawlins County SO

78

13

Pratt County SO

County Total

0

Havensville PD
113

2

Onaga PD

County Total

DNR

St George PD

Wamego PD

7

2

104

11

11

57

St Mary’s PD

Pottawatomie County SO

Phillips County SO

County Total

47

Larned PD

8

10

County Total

5

DNR

3

Pawnee County SO

Minneapolis PD

Delphos PD

2

Ottawa County SO 3

9

1

Osborne PD

County Total

8

2012
Incidents

Osborne County SO

Reporting Agency

4

3

1

61

54

7

49

0

3

CB

DNR

3

43

11

11

39

34

5

7

7

DNR

0

6

1

5

2012
Arrests

0

0

0

1

1

0

2

0

1

CB

DNR

0

1

1

1

4

4

0

2

2

DNR

0

0

0

0

66.7%

100.0%

33.3%

76.9%

81.5%

53.8%

41.6%

NA

100.0%

CB

DNR

42.9%

40.4%

90.9%

90.9%

61.4%

63.8%

50.0%

62.5%

100.0%

DNR

0.0%

66.7%

100.0%

62.5%

10

10

0

79

66

13

132

0

1

0

3

19

109

10

10

56

51

5

10

5

0

5

3

3

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

10

10

0

48

42

6

69

0

0

0

3

11

55

10

10

35

31

4

2

2

0

0

3

3

2

2

0

6

6

0

2

0

0

0

0

1

1

2

2

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

80.0%

80.0%

NA

53.2%

54.5%

46.2%

50.8%

NA

0.0%

NA

100.0%

52.6%

49.5%

80.0%

80.0%

60.7%

58.8%

80.0%

20.0%

40.0%

NA

0.0%

100.0%

100.0%

8

7

1

94

69

3

3

0

48

35

13

74

131

25

0

2

0

10

5

57

18

18

53

48

5

2

2

0

0

6

6

2010
Arrests

0

5

0

9

9

108

15

15

68

58

10

12

5

0

7

8

8

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

0

0

0

1

1

0

4

0

0

0

1

0

3

3

3

7

7

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

37.5%

42.9%

0.0%

50.0%

49.3%

52.0%

53.4%

NA

40.0%

NA

100.0%

55.6%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

67.6%

70.7%

50.0%

16.7%

40.0%

NA

0.0%

62.5%

62.5%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
26

County Total

1

Lacrosse PD 3
9

8

Rush County SO

County Total

5

Stockton PD 3
14

4

Plainville PD

County Total

5

557

8

549

15

0

2

Rooks County SO

County Total

Kansas State University PD

Riley County PD

Chase PD

Little River PD

0

Geneseo PD

3

3
0

Bushton PD

DNR

10

16

Sterling PD

Lyons PD

County Total

2

14

2

Rice County SO

Belleville PD

Republic County SO

9

Buhler PD
881

1

County Total

4

38

South Hutchinson PD

Nickerson PD 6

778

Hutchinson PD

Haven PD

51

2012
Incidents

Reno County SO

Reporting Agency

7

1

6

14

5

5

4

228

5

223

13

0

2

0

0

0

DNR

11

17

2

15

496

7

1

1

26

417

44

2012
Arrests

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

DNR

1

2

0

2

41

0

0

0

1

35

5

77.8%

100.0%

75.0%

92.9%

100.0%

100.0%

80.0%

40.9%

62.5%

40.6%

80.0%

NA

100.0%

NA

NA

0.0%

DNR

100.0%

93.8%

100.0%

92.9%

51.6%

77.8%

100.0%

25.0%

65.8%

49.1%

76.5%

7

2

5

7

1

DNR

6

492

5

487

67

0

4

0

0

9

38

16

16

7

9

900

3

1

3

19

824

50

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

3

1

2

7

1

DNR

6

187

4

183

45

0

7

0

0

3

28

7

14

6

8

452

3

1

4

20

386

38

0

0

0

1

0

DNR

1

0

0

0

9

0

3

0

0

0

5

1

2

1

1

44

0

0

1

5

38

0

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

42.9%

50.0%

40.0%

85.7%

100.0%

DNR

83.3%

38.0%

80.0%

37.6%

53.7%

NA

100.0%

NA

NA

33.3%

60.5%

37.5%

75.0%

71.4%

77.8%

45.3%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

78.9%

42.2%

76.0%

18

9

9

11

2

2

7

436

5

431

17

0

2

0

0

2

DNR

13

11

7

4

1055

DNR

3

5

28

943

76

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

11

3

8

8

1

2

5

210

2

208

13

0

2

0

0

1

DNR

10

10

6

4

478

DNR

0

6

20

392

60

2010
Arrests

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

DNR0

0

0

0

0

51

DNR

0

1

1

45

4

61.1%

33.3%

88.9%

63.6%

50.0%

100.0%

57.1%

48.2%

40.0%

48.3%

76.5%

NA

100.0%

NA

NA

50.0%

DNR

76.9%

90.9%

85.7%

100.0%

40.5%

DNR

0.0%

100.0%

67.9%

36.8%

73.7%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
27

24

Wichita PD

0
2
5

Eastborough PD

Cheney PD

0
2

Andale PD

3

Maize USD 266

0

6

Bel Aire PD

Kechi PD

9

52

0

2

0

2

51

21

Maize PD

Park City PD

Mount Hope PD

0

0

10

11

2

0

0

0

20

3,176

105

79

50

21

16

5

548

0

545

3

35

31

4

2012
Arrests

0

1

10

Goddard PD

Garden Plain PD

11

Clearwater PD

3

4

Wichita State University PD

Colwich PD

26

6,418

Haysville PD

Valley Center PD

97
109

Derby PD

106

County Total

19

5

Sedgwick County SO

Scott City PD

Scott County SO

0

Assaria PD
768

742

Salina PD

County Total

26

Saline County SO

61

45

Russell PD

County Total

16

2012
Incidents

Russell County SO

Reporting Agency

0

0

0

0

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

219

22

5

2

2

1

1

35

0

35

0

3

3

0

NA

100.0%

NA

33.3%

86.5%

42.9%

NA

0.0%

100.0%

100.0%

40.0%

0.0%

NA

0.0%

73.1%

46.1%

76.1%

76.3%

45.3%

79.2%

78.9%

80.0%

66.8%

NA

68.7%

11.5%

52.5%

62.2%

25.0%

0

7

1

22

31

21

DNR

5

14

10

3

1

1

0

36

6,397

142

119

229

19

17

2

691

0

655

36

73

59

14

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

0

8

1

17

28

9

DNR

2

8

12

1

0

2

0

29

3,375

106

102

114

19

19

0

527

0

506

21

71

55

16

0

1

0

3

1

0

DNR

0

0

2

0

0

1

0

0

243

10

3

16

4

4

0

31

0

30

1

14

12

2

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

NA

100.0%

100.0%

63.6%

87.1%

42.9%

DNR

40.0%

57.1%

100.0%

33.3%

0.0%

100.0%

NA

80.6%

49.0%

67.6%

83.2%

42.8%

78.9%

88.2%

0.0%

71.8%

NA

72.7%

55.6%

78.1%

72.9%

100.0%

0

2

1

13

32

29

1

2

10

6

8

3

1

3

35

6,507

153

161

258

22

22

0

0

562

39

69

48

21

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

0

1

1

8

13

15

1

0

3

6

4

3

0

0

24

3,551

20

136

126

15

15

0

0

504

29

41

43

8

2010
Arrests

0

0

0

0

3

2

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

2

277

1

2

13

2

2

0

0

34

1

7

6

1

NA

50.0%

100.0%

61.5%

31.3%

44.8%

100.0%

0.0%

20.0%

83.3%

37.5%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

62.9%

50.3%

12.4%

83.2%

43.8%

59.1%

59.1%

NA

NA

83.6%

71.8%

63.8%

77.1%

33.3%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
28

County Total

DNR

DNR

Smith Center PD

DNR

29

2

County Total

24

5

6

Smith County SO 2

Goodland PD

3

Sherman County SO

County Total

3

3

Hoxie PD

3

Sheridan County SO 3

2,056

2

Washburn University PD

County Total

0
1

Topeka Fire Arson Inv

MTAA PD

3

Silver Lake PD

DNR

2

2

1,849

Topeka PD

Rossville PD

202

5

Shawnee County SO

0
168

Kismet PD

County Total

157

Liberal PD

6,871

11

County Total

1

0

2012
Incidents

Seward County SO

Bentley PD

3

Goddard USD 265

Sedgwick County continued

Reporting Agency

DNR

DNR

DNR

22

17

5

5

3

2

783

0

0

0

DNR

1

674

108

157

0

147

10

3,517

0

0

2012
Arrests

DNR

DNR

DNR

1

1

0

0

0

0

26

0

0

0

DNR

0

24

2

13

0

12

1

255

0

0

DNR

DNR

DNR

72.4%

66.7%

100.0%

83.3%

100.0%

66.7%

36.8%

0.0%

0.0%

NA

DNR

50.0%

35.2%

52.5%

85.7%

NA

86.0%

81.8%

47.5%

0.0%

NA

0

1

0

DNR

1

537

117

177

0

163

14

3,814

0

0

DNR

DNR

DNR

14

12

2

3

2

1

DNR

DNR

DNR

7

6

1

3

2

1

656

1,833

DNR

DNR

DNR

0

0

0

0

0

0

21

0

0

0

DNR

0

21

0

20

0

18

2

280

0

0

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

3

1

2

DNR

3

1,610

214

193

0

173

20

7,039

0

0

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

DNR

DNR

DNR

50.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

34.6%

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

DNR

33.3%

32.0%

54.7%

81.3%

NA

83.8%

60.0%

50.2%

NA

NA

3

2

1

24

15

9

2

2

0

1,770

3

2

0

DNR

4

1,578

183

212

0

184

28

7,226

1

0

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

1

1

0

22

14

8

3

3

0

730

1

0

0

DNR

5

625

99

209

0

181

28

3,913

1

0

2010
Arrests

0

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

34

0

0

0

DNR

2

32

0

25

0

21

4

303

0

0

33.3%

50.0%

0.0%

87.5%

93.3%

77.8%

100.0%

100.0%

NA

39.3%

33.3%

0.0%

NA

DNR

75.0%

37.6%

54.1%

86.8%

NA

87.0%

85.7%

50.0%

100.0%

NA

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
29

County Total

Wakeeney PD

Trego County SO

Colby PD

County Total

County Total

Thomas County SO

Argonia PD

2

Conway Springs PD

Oxford PD

16

10

6

53

47

6

180

DNR

9

DNR

2

24

Mulvane PD

Caldwell PD

11

3

107

Belle Plaine PD

11

11

DNR

Wellington PD

2

2
2

27

County Total

0
10

Sumner County SO

Hugoton PD

Stevens County SO 2

County Total

Stanton County SO 3

County Total

2

St John PD

Macksville PD

4

Stafford PD

3

4

2012
Incidents

Stafford County SO

Reporting Agency

10

7

3

51

50

1

107

DNR

7

DNR

2

18

8

58

14

10

10

DNR

2

2

7

0

1

2

4

2012
Arrests

0

0

0

7

7

0

6

DNR

0

DNR

0

1

0

4

1

1

1

DNR

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

62.5%

70.0%

50.0%

83.0%

91.5%

16.7%

56.1%

DNR

77.8%

DNR

100.0%

70.8%

72.7%

50.5%

48.1%

81.8%

81.8%

DNR

100.0%

100.0%

60.0%

NA

50.0%

50.0%

75.0%

7

6

6
9

1

65

51

14

113

2

0

0

4

25

DNR

63

19

0

0

DNR

2

2

4

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

7

6

1

14

0

0

0

0

2

DNR

9

3

0

0

DNR

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

3

70

55

15

195

2

0

1

6

37

DNR

117

32

5

5

DNR

5

5

10

0

4

2

4

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

77.8%

100.0%

33.3%

82.9%

81.8%

86.7%

50.8%

100.0%

NA

0.0%

66.7%

62.2%

DNR

46.2%

50.0%

0.0%

0.0%

DNR

40.0%

40.0%

40.0%

NA

0.0%

0.0%

100.0%

2

0

DNR

1

29

1

56

22

0

0

DNR

2

2

14

0

6

5

3

2010
Arrests

5

3

2

73

62

5

4

1

73

61

12

212

11

111

3

7

DNR

6

36

2

123

35

4

4

DNR

3

3

24

2

9

7

6

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

1

1

0

11

9

2

14

0

0

DNR

0

3

0

8

3

0

0

DNR

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

80.0%

100.0%

50.0%

84.9%

83.9%

90.9%

45.8%

66.7%

0.0%

DNR

16.7%

72.2%

50.0%

39.0%

54.3%

0.0%

0.0%

DNR

66.7%

66.7%

54.2%

0.0%

66.7%

57.1%

50.0%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
30
34
13

KU Med Center PD

County Total

KCK Community College PD
1,451

3

1,339

Kansas City PD

Edwardsville PD

48

Bonner Springs PD

5

14

Wyandotte County SO

22

12

Yates Center PD

County Total

10

Woodson County SO

38

30

Fredonia PD

Neodesha PD

7

3

1

County Total

County Total

3

7

7

0

0

3

Wilson County SO

Wichita County SO

County Total

Washington County SO

County Total

Wallace County SO 3

0
11

Maple Hill PD

County Total

0

DNR

Eskridge PD

Alma PD

11

Wabaunsee County SO

2

2012
Incidents

Reporting Agency

841

1

11

38

751

32

8

12

9

3

22

15

1

6

3

3

6

6

0

0

9

0

0

DNR

9

2012
Arrests

51

0

0

10

38

3

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

DNR

0

54.4%

33.3%

84.6%

82.4%

53.2%

60.4%

57.1%

54.5%

75.0%

30.0%

55.3%

46.7%

100.0%

85.7%

100.0%

100.0%

71.4%

71.4%

NA

NA

81.8%

NA

NA

DNR

81.8%

1,095

579

0

5

7
0

30

508

30

6

16

8

46

969

56

17

24

12

8

69

85

12

30

29

10

5

5

10

10

0

0

17

0

0

DNR

17

37

0

1

4

29

3

0

1

1

0

14

6

5

3

0

0

2

2

0

0

3

0

0

DNR

3

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

40

35

10

5

5

12

12

1

1

23

0

0

DNR

23

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

49.5%

NA

57.1%

56.5%

49.4%

48.2%

35.3%

62.5%

58.3%

66.7%

64.7%

60.0%

68.6%

70.0%

100.0%

100.0%

66.7%

66.7%

0.0%

0.0%

60.9%

NA

NA

DNR

60.9%

1,130

1

12

42

1,004

67

4

30

13

17

63

33

16

14

7

7

16

16

1

1

36

0

1

DNR

35

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

640

0

4

49

530

54

3

18

9

9

44

26

10

8

4

4

17

17

1

1

19

0

0

DNR

19

2010
Arrests

64

0

0

9

48

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

0

4

4

0

0

3

0

0

DNR

3

51.0%

0.0%

33.3%

95.2%

48.0%

70.0%

75.0%

60.0%

69.2%

52.9%

69.8%

78.8%

62.5%

57.1%

57.1%

57.1%

81.3%

81.3%

100.0%

100.0%

44.4%

NA

0.0%

DNR

45.7%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
31

0

2012
Incidents

44

14,102

42

24,373

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)

909

7

0

0

0

DNR

0

6

1

0

54.1%

88.1%

87.5%

NA

NA

DNR

NA

85.2%

100.0%

NA

24,159

47

11

0

0

DNR

0

30

6

0

2012 Dual 2012 Arrest
2011
Arrests Percentage Incidents

Data collected is based on information entered into KIBRS by June 30, 2013
Agency did not report any data or submit zero reports for the current year
Agency submitted incomplete data for the current year
Tribal Police are only required to submit reports for crimes involving non-tribe members
Agency reported summary data for 2012
Agency went to covered by status midyear

State Totals

Potawatomi Tribal PD

7

0

0

DNR

Total State/Tribal

0

0

DNR

0

29

8

4

24

0

8

0

2012
Arrests

4

Kickapoo Tribal PD

Iowa Tribal PD

4

Sac & Fox Tribal PD

State Fire Marshal

27

Kansas Wildlife and Parks

Kansas Highway Patrol

7

Kansas Bureau of Investigation

State Agencies/Tribal

Reporting Agency

14,550

45

12

0

0

DNR

0

29

4

0

1,072

4

2

0

0

DNR

0

2

0

0

2011 2011 Dual
Arrests
Arrests

55.8%

87..2%

90.9%

NA

NA

DNR

NA

90.0%

66.7%

NA

23,828

59

18

0

DNR

DNR

0

35

3

3

2011 Arrest
2010
Percentage Incidents

14,193

53

12

0

DNR

DNR

0

35

3

3

2010
Arrests

1,174

9

3

0

DNR

DNR

0

5

1

0

54.6%

74.6%

50.0%

NA

DNR

DNR

NA

85.7%

66.7%

100.0%

2010 Dual 2010 Arrest
Arrests Percentage

Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
Domestic Violence
Victim/Offender Characteristics
Victim (Agencies that filled out summary sheets are not included. Incidents may include more than one victim or suspect)
Age

Female Male

Unknown Total

White

Black

Indian

Asian

Unknown Total

Percent of Total

169

191

0

360

301

50

1

1

7

360

1.5%

10-14

66

88

0

154

124

29

0

0

1

154

0.7%

15-19

1,154

410

0

1,564

1,273

274

5

10

2

1,564

6.7%

20-24

3,515

1,266

0

4,781

3,763

901

65

44

8

4,781

20.5%

25-29

2,980

1,183

1

4,164

3,375

689

50

39

11

4,164

17.8%

30-34

2,339

958

1

3,298

2,759

475

27

25

12

3,298

14.1%

35-39

1,672

705

0

2,377

2,023

301

22

26

5

2,377

10.2%

40-44

1,393

639

0

2,032

1,714

281

12

20

5

2,032

8.7%

45-49

1,137

569

0

1,706

1,441

228

20

12

5

1,706

7.3%

50-54

763

509

0

1,272

1,043

207

12

6

4

1,272

5.5%

55-59

398

308

0

706

588

109

4

4

1

706

3.0%

60-64

214

169

0

383

320

59

1

1

2

383

1.6%

65-69

98

85

0

183

167

132

0

1

2

183

0.8%

70-74

72

38

0

110

100

8

0

2

0

110

0.5%

75 Plus

72

57

0

129

117

9

0

2

1

129

0.6%

Unknown

28

73

13

114

74

7

1

0

32

114

0.5%

16,070

7,248

15

23,333

19,182

3,640

220

193

98

23,333

Under 10

Total

100.0%

Suspect (Agencies that filled out summary sheets are not included. Incidents may include more than one victim or suspect)
Age

Female Male

Unknown Total

White

Black

Indian

Asian

Unknown Total

Percent of Total

Under 10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

10-14

7

14

0

21

18

3

0

0

0

21

0.1%

15-19

521

695

0

1,216

940

262

7

6

1

1,216

5.6%

20-24

1,466

2,972

0

4,438

3,252

1,081

67

33

5

4,438

20.5%

25-29

1,081

3,156

0

4,237

3,194

946

56

35

6

4,237

19.6%

30-34

859

2,478

0

3,337

2,631

645

24

28

9

3,337

15.4%

35-39

661

1,754

0

2,415

1,943

422

26

18

6

2,415

11.2%

40-44

529

1,477

0

2,006

1,579

382

19

19

7

2,006

9.3%

45-49

436

1,237

0

1,673

1,297

342

18

14

2

1,673

7.7%

50-54

318

908

0

1,226

924

273

19

8

2

1,226

5.7%

55-59

117

400

0

517

427

88

0

2

0

517

2.4%

60-64

54

178

0

232

183

46

0

2

1

232

1.1%

65-69

26

76

0

102

91

10

1

0

0

102

0.5%

70-74

20

47

0

67

59

7

0

1

0

67

0.3%

75 Plus

13

30

0

43

40

3

0

0

0

43

0.2%

Unknown

32

72

4

108

50

40

0

1

17

108

0.5%

6,140

15,494

4

21,638

16,628

4,550

237

167

56

21,638

Total

32

100.0%
Domestic Violence
Relationship of Victim to Offender
Relationship 1
Spouse
Common Law Spouse

2012 Percent
of Total

2011

Percent
of Total

2010

5,471 16.57%

5,392

15.90%

5,483

16.24%

Groups

Percent
of Total

642

1.94%

685

2.02%

616

1,665

5.04%

1,761

5.19%

1,638

1,041

3.15%

1,300

3.83%

1,380

4.09%

Sibling

878

2.66%

1,181

3.48%

1,384

4.10%

Grandparent

117

0.35%

97

0.29%

80

0.24%

Grandchild

42

0.13%

46

0.14%

65

0.19%

In-Law

253

0.77%

266

0.78%

305

0.90%

Step-parent

131

0.40%

206

0.61%

342

1.01%

Step-child

183

0.55%

256

0.75%

277

0.82%

Step-sibling

27

0.08%

40

0.12%

48

0.14%

Foster Parent

8

0.02%

15

0.04%

22

0.07%

Foster Child

5

0.02%

2

0.01%

4

0.01%

Foster Sibling

6

0.02%

7

0.02%

9

0.03%

Other Family Member

432

1.31%

547

1.61%

605

1.79%

Acquaintance

891

2.70%

922

2.72%

902

2.67%

Friend

173

0.52%

250

0.74%

151

0.45%

Roommates

809

2.45%

774

2.28%

659

1.95%

Neighbor

42

0.13%

35

0.10%

38

0.11%

Babysittee

3

0.01%

5

0.01%

10

0.03%

38.05% 12,460

Family
Member
17%

4.85%

Child

Stranger
2%

1.82%

Parent

Other Known
9%

36.90%

Boyfriend/Girlfriend 2

13,445 40.72% 12,908

Significant
Other
72%

Significant Other

21,124 71.80%

Family Member

5,055 17.18%

Otherwise Known

2,588

8.80%

655

2.23%

Stranger

Intimate Relationship
Homosexual
2%
Spouse/Ex
35%
Dating/Ex
63%

Spouse/Ex

7,323

34.67%

Dating/Ex

13,445

63.65%

356

1.69%

Homosexual

Immediate Family
Sibling
23%

Child of Boyfriend/
Girlfriend

147

0.45%

155

0.46%

141

0.42%

BF/GF of Suspect’s Parent

120

0.36%

45

0.13%

36

0.11%

Homosexual Relationship

356

1.08%

342

1.01%

317

0.94%

1,210

3.66%

1,178

3.47%

1,259

3.73%

5

0.02%

5

0.01%

2

0.01%

Parent

1,804

45.74%

665

2.01%

730

2.15%

728

2.16%

Child

1,229

31.16%

3,596 10.89%

4,120

12.15%

4,162

12.33%

911

23.10%

Ex-Spouse
Employer/Employee
Otherwise Known
Victim was Suspect
Relationship Unknown

311

0.94%

428

1.26%

344

Stranger

344

1.04%

223

0.66%

298

TOTAL

33,018

33,765

33,921
33

Parent
46%
Child
31%

Sibling

1.02% 1)Relationships are counted for each victim to
each offender and may exceed the incidents
0.88% reported.
2) Includes ex-boyfriend/girlfriend
3) A 2012 change in definition,; siblings alone
are no longer classified as domestic violence.
Domestic Violence
Location of Offense
Location
Parking Lot/Garage

2012

Percent
of Total

2011

Percent
of Total

2010

Percent
of Total

455

1.8%

470

1.9%

368

1.5%

Street

1,380

5.6%

1,179

4.9%

1193

5.0%

Alley

51

0.2%

42

0.2%

49

0.2%

101

0.4%

102

0.4%

114

0.5%

77

0.3%

76

0.3%

86

Residence

0.4%

Highway
Rural Road

Multiple
29%
Single
71%

3

0.0%

8

0.0%

4

0.0%

10

0.0%

5

0.0%

7

0.0%

14,718

59.8%

14,794

61.2%

14,854

62.3%

6,049

24.6%

5,917

24.5%

5,555

23.3%

Nursing Care Facility

29

0.1%

35

0.1%

29

0.1%

Dormitory/Sorority/Fraternity

16

0.1%

19

0.1%

20

0.1%

College/University/Propriety School

26

0.1%

14

0.1%

22

0.1%

All Other Schools

49

0.2%

50

0.2%

59

0.2%

Church/Synagogue/Temple

19

0.1%

23

0.1%

15

0.1%

Government/Tax-Payer Funded Bldg

87

0.4%

98

0.4%

89

0.4%

Jail/Prison

41

0.2%

32

0.1%

28

0.1%

Hospital

61

0.2%

51

0.2%

67

0.3%

Hotel/Motel

371

54.8%

5

0.0%

10

0.0%

18

0.1%

Tavern/Bar/Liquor

167

24.7%

11

0.0%

19

0.1%

18

0.1%

Restaurant

139

20.5%

0

0.0%

1

0.0%

10

0.0%

115

0.5%

108

0.4%

105

0.4%

Service/Gas Station

46

0.2%

29

0.1%

38

0.2%

Convenience Store

90

0.4%

52

0.2%

92

0.4%

Department/Discount Store

85

0.3%

78

0.3%

63

0.3%

Grocery/Supermarket

36

0.1%

32

0.1%

50

0.2%

Specialty Store

77

0.3%

52

0.2%

77

0.3%

Mall Commons

10

0.0%

9

0.0%

9

0.0%

Tavern/Bar/Liquor Store

167

0.7%

187

0.8%

200

0.8%

Business

Restaurant

139

0.6%

105

0.4%

103

0.4%

Open /Streets

Hotel/Motel/Inn

371

1.5%

309

1.3%

261

1.1%

9

0.0%

6

0.0%

8

0.0%

10

0.0%

16

0.1%

7

0.0%

100

0.4%

89

0.4%

93

0.4%

11

0.0%

14

0.1%

6

0.0%

Other

144

0.6%

101

0.4%

84

0.3%

Casino

17

0.0%

10

0.0%

12

0.1%

Recreational Facility

17

0.1%

17

0.1%

15

0.1%

Vacant City Lot
Abandoned Structure
Single Residence
Multiple Residence

Pharmacy/Doctor’s Office
Bank/Savings and Loan
Automated Teller Machine
Commercial Office Building

Storage/Warehouse
Park Buildings/Shelters
Open Area
Lake/Waterway/River

TOTAL

24,623

24,159

23,828

34

Single

14,718

70.7%

6,094

29.3%

Multiple

Hospitality
Restaurant
2 0%
Hotel/motel
55%

Tavern/Bar
25%

Public Places
Other
4%
Hospitality
18%

Business
20%

Open Area
58%

758

19.9%

2,205

57.9%

Hospitality

685

17.9%

Other

163

4.3%
Domestic Violence
Weapon Used
Weapon Used
Weapon Type

2012

Percent of
Total

2011

Percent of
Total

2010

Percent of
Total

Firearm

102

0.42%

101

0.42%

41

0.17%

Handgun

250

1.04%

230

0.95%

189

0.80%

Rifle

26

0.11%

26

0.11%

37

0.16%

Shotgun

46

0.19%

40

0.17%

37

0.16%

Knife/Other Cutting Instrument

644

2.67%

650

2.68%

599

2.52%

Blunt Object

333

1.38%

337

1.39%

373

1.57%

Motor Vehicle

189

0.78%

173

0.71%

206

0.87%

17,538

72.78%

17,436

71.98%

16,779

70.66%

Poison

3

0.01%

3

0.01%

1

0.00%

Explosive

4

0.02%

4

0.02%

0

0.00%

29

0.12%

17

0.07%

18

0.08%

2

0.01%

2

0.01%

2

0.01%

25

0.10%

25

0.10%

83

0.35%

Other Weapons

1,316

5.46%

1,481

6.11%

1,340

5.64%

None

2,548

10.57%

2,287

9.44%

2,574

10.84%

Unknown

1,042

4.32%

1,410

5.82%

1,468

6.18%

TOTAL

24,097

Personal Weapons (Hands/Fist/Feet)

Fire/Incendiary Device
Drugs/Narcotics
Asphyxiation

24,222

23,747

Not all offenses require a weapon to be listed

Firearms

Personal
18,000
17,500
17,000
16,500
16,000
15,500
15,000
14,500
14,000
13,500

17,436
16,651

17,538

Knife

500

424

397

16,779

367

400

660

650

640

304

289

620

300

599

600

200

15,077

560
540

0
2009

2010

2011

2012

2008

2009

Blunt Object
388

381

380

2010

2011

2009

337

333

180

2012

1,532

1,500

198
189
175

1,474

1,450

1,444
1,379

1,400
1,350

173

1,309

1,300

170

320

2011

Other

190

360

2010

1,550

206

200

373

340

2008

2012

Motor Vehicle
210

400

582

580

100

2008

644

625

1,250

160

1,200

300

150

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2008

2009

2010

35

2011

2012

1,150
2008

2009

2010

2011

2012
Domestic Violence
Type of Injury
Type of Injury
Injury Type

2012 Percent of
Total

Broken Bones

2011 Percent of
Total

2010 Percent of
Total

89

0.4%

96

0.4%

106

0.5%

Possible Internal Injuries

126

0.6%

98

0.4%

142

0.6%

Severe Laceration

162

0.7%

153

0.6%

200

0.9%

10,259

45.3%

9,997

42.2%

10,146

45.2%

Other Major Injury

75

0.3%

80

0.3%

112

0.5%

Loss of Teeth

16

0.1%

14

0.1%

24

0.1%

Unconsciousness

43

0.2%

50

0.2%

58

0.3%

None

11,891

52.5%

13,207

55.7%

11,674

52.0%

TOTAL

22,661

Apparent Minor Injuries

23,695

23,828

Not all reported crimes require this data element

Domestic Violence: Type of Injury 3yr Trend

36
Domestic Violence
Day of Offense
Day of the Week :Offense
Day

2012

Percent of
Total

2011

Percent of
Total

2010

Percent of
Total

Sunday

4,506

18.5%

4,397

18.2%

4,010

16.8%

Monday

3,155

12.9%

3,080

12.7%

3,021

12.7%

Tuesday

3,165

13.0%

3,086

12.8%

2,889

12.1%

Wednesday

3,087

12.7%

3,004

12.4%

3,776

15.8%

Thursday

3,076

12.6%

2,975

12.3%

2,952

12.4%

Friday

3,196

13.1%

3,276

13.6%

3,280

13.8%

Saturday

4,188

17.2%

4,341

18.0%

3,900

16.4%

TOTAL

24,373

24,159

23,828

Domestic Violence: Day of the Week 3yr Trend

5000
4500
4000
3500
2010
3000

2011

2500

2012

2000
1500
1000
500
0
Sunday

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

37

Friday

Saturday
Domestic Violence
Time of Offense
Shift 3yr Trend
Time of Offense
Time

2012

Percent
of
Total

2011

Percent
of
Total

2010

Percent
of
Total

00:00—01:59

2,562

10.5%

2,648

11.0%

2,658

11.2%

02:00—03:59

2,347

9.6%

2,425

10.0%

2,329

8,552
8,705
8,727

Night

9.8%

04:00—05:59

1,415

5.8%

1,459

6.0%

1,463

6.1%

06:00—07:59

1,461

6.0%

1,394

5.8%

1,410

5.9%

08:00—09:59

2,217

9.1%

2,032

8.4%

2,037

2,337

9.6%

2,301

9.5%

2,285

9.6%

12:00—13:59

2,043

8.4%

2,029

8.4%

1,930

1,499

6.1%

1,429

5.9%

1,314

5.5%

16:00—17:59

1,850

7.6%

1,777

7.4%

1,786

7.5%

18:00—19:59

2,122

8.7%

2,138

8.8%

2,035

8.5%

20:00—21:59

2,318

9.5%

2,338

9.7%

2,303

9.7%

22:00—23:59

2,228

9.1%

2,173

9.0%

2,277

9.6%

17

0.1%

16

0.1%

1

2010

8,058
7,756
7,662

Day

8.1%

14:00—15:59

2011

8.5%

10:00—11:59

2012

7,789
7,682
7,438

Evening

0.0%

Unknown
TOTAL

24,416

24,159

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

Day-6am to 2pm
Evening-2pm to 10pm
Night-10pm-6am

2012 Percentage
Day
33%

Night
35%
Evening
32%

23,828

Time of Day

3,000
2,500
2,000

2010
2011

1,500

2012
1,000
500
0
0:00

2:00

4:00

6:00

8:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00

38
Domestic Violence
Statute Violations 1
Statute

Description

2012

2011

2010

08-1543

Pedestrian under the influence of alcohol or drugs

4

9

8

08-1566

Reckless Driving

11

2

9

08-1567

Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs

17

25

35

08-1568

Fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer

9

3

7

08-1599

Transporting an open container

7

3

6

27

20

32

8

9

6

1

0

1

412

348

360

19

19

19

717

627

731

18

16

6

287

869

3,360

4,940

6,524

7,411

10,495

6,140

4,677

80

84

82

21-5402

Murder in the first degree

2
2

21-5403

Murder in the second degree

21-5404

Voluntary Manslaughter 2

21-5412a

Assault

21-5412c

Assault on a law enforcement officer

21-5412b

Aggravated assault

21-5412d

Aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer

21-5413

Battery

21-5414a1B1 Domestic Battery; intentional bodily harm caused by a family member
21-5414a2B1 Domestic Battery; physical contact by a family member in a rude manner
21-5413c

Battery against a criminal justice officer

21-5413b

Aggravated battery

370

388

847

21-5413b1A

Aggravated battery; intentional, great bodily harm

146

104

33

21-5413b1B

Aggravated battery; intentional, bodily harm

299

205

53

21-5413b1C

Aggravated battery; intentional, physical contact

73

68

30

21-5413b2A

Aggravated battery; reckless, great bodily harm

40

21

8

21-5413b2B

Aggravated battery; reckless, bodily harm

25

22

18

21-5415

Terroristic/Criminal threat

1,225

1,160

1,197

21-5408a

Kidnapping

51

47

57

21-5408b

Aggravated kidnapping

40

36

31

21-5409

Interference with parental custody

14

20

15

21-5411

Criminal restraint

483

398

520

21-5420a

Robbery

19

18

21

21-5420b

Aggravated robbery

21

17

20

21-5417

Mistreatment of a dependent adult; physical

9

5

6

21-5427 (all)

Stalking

241

151

258

21-5503

Rape; unknown circumstances

86

52

110

21-5503a1A

Rape; sexual intercourse with a person who does not consent; force

48

73

72

21-5503a1B

Rape; Sexual intercourse with physically powerless victim

2

0

1

39
Domestic Violence
Statute Violations
Statute

Description

2012

21-5506

Indecent liberties with a child

0

0

7

21-5506b/b3

Aggravated indecent liberties with a child

3

5

7

21-5504

Criminal sodomy

10

10

8

21-5504b

Aggravated criminal sodomy

14

14

40

0

1

1

21-5504b1/b2 Aggravated criminal sodomy; sodomy with a child <14 years of age

2011

2010

21-5504b3A

Aggravated criminal sodomy; With person/animal by force

9

0

4

21-5513

Lewd and lascivious behavior

0

0

6

21-5508

Indecent solicitation of a child

0

0

4

21-5508b

Aggravated indecent solicitation of a child

0

0

1

21-5510

Sexual exploitation of a child

1

0

1

21-5505a

Sexual battery

33

22

22

21-5505b

Aggravated sexual battery

6

10

8

21-5509a1

Electronic sexual solicitation of 14 to <16 years of age

0

0

1

21-5509a2

Electronic sexual solicitation of a child <14 years of age

0

0

1

21-5601

Endangering a child; Involves child <18 years of age

127

113

144

21-5602

Abuse of a child; <18 years of age; Intent torture/cruel beating/inhuman punish

25

89

102

21-5607

Furnishing alcohol to a minor

5

6

8

21-5603

Contributing to child's misconduct

2

0

10

21-5428a1

Blackmail; Statement to cause public ridicule

3

0

0

440

259

337

21-5801/5802 Theft
21-5803

Criminal deprivation of property

68

34

41

21-5807

Burglary

38

7

49

21-5807a1

Burglary; building used as a dwelling

33

24

21

21-5807a2

Burglary; building not used as a dwelling

4

1

4

21-5807b

Aggravated burglary

83

62

101

21-5812a

Arson

14

9

11

21-5812b

Aggravated arson

6

12

6

21-5813

Criminal damage to property

3,825

3,142

3,311

21-5808

Criminal trespass

264

246

247

21-5904a2/
21-5913

Obstructing legal process or official duty

277

242

229

21-5904a1

Falsely reporting a crime

12

7

8

21-5917

False impersonation

1

1

3

21-5909a

Intimidation of a witness or victim

46

28

53

40
Domestic Violence
Statute Violations
Statute

Description

21-5909b

Aggravated intimidation of a witness or victim

21-6206

2012

2011

2010

4

13

15

Harassment by telecom device

750

603

1,005

21-5924

Violation of protective order

136

89

299

21-5924a1

Violation of protective order issued from abuse

844

844

963

299

23

6

22

6

2

127

34

14

2

1

2

21-5924a2/3/4 Violation of protective order; restraining order; pre trial order
21-5924a5

Violation of protective order issued by court post disposition

21-5924a6

Violation of protective order issued from stalking

21-6101

Eavesdropping

21-6203

Disorderly conduct

521

712

966

21-6203a1

Disorderly conduct; brawling and fighting

161

92

57

21-6203a3

Disorderly conduct; offensive language, noisy conduct

514

244

263

21-6302

Criminal Carrying of a weapon

7

2

5

21-6301

Criminal use of a weapon

24

23

13

21-6305

Aggravated weapons violation

4

5

1

21-6304

Criminal possession of firearm

21

11

9

21-6308

Unlawful discharge of firearms

16

18

9

5

2

6

Drug Offenses

446

409

400

Other

107

153

48

29,685

25,076

29,139

21-6412
Drug Offense
Other

Cruelty to animals
3

TOTAL
1)There are instances where multiple statutes are reported within one domestic incident
2) Homicides that involve victims under the age of 18 are included in this number
3)All drug offenses are combined for this report

Effective July 1, 2011, the Kansas Legislature recodified most criminal statutes. This resulted in new statute notations for most criminal offenses.
The statute numbers listed in this section are based on January 1, 2012.
The data presented include information from all statute numbers related to the corresponding offenses.

41
Protection from Abuse Act
K.S.A. 60-3101 through 60-3112

PFA Filings

The Kansas Legislature created the Protection from Abuse Act (PFA) in
1979. According to the statute, “this act shall be liberally construed to promote the protection of victims of domestic violence from bodily injury or
threats of bodily injury and to facilitate access to judicial protection for the
victims, whether represented by counsel or proceeding pro se.”

Year Filings Percent of
Change
1995

7,678

14.38%

1996

7,506

-2.24%

1997

7,968

6.16%

A protection order is a court order for the purpose of preventing further
violent or threatening behavior. The PFA instructs a specific individual to
refrain from having contact with another individual. Any district court shall
have jurisdiction over the proceedings in obtaining an order. A person who
is seeking relief under this act may obtain a petition from the clerk of the
district court or from a domestic violence program.

1998

7,361

-7.62%

1999

7,691

4.48%

2000

7,300

5.08%

2001

8,140

11.51%

2002

8,548

5.01%

A person seeking relief under this act must have lived with the abuser
either presently or in the past or have a child in common. A parent or an
adult residing with a minor child may seek a petition on behalf of the minor
child. As of July 1, 2002, persons in dating relationships also can apply for
a protection order. Once an order is filed with the court a temporary order is
issued and a hearing is set within 20 days. The final order can be issued for
up to one year. No more than two orders can be filed within one year.

2003

7,672

-10.25%

2004

7,914

3.15%

2005

8,222

3.89%

2006

7,942

-3.41%

2007

7,903

-0.01%

2008

7,963

0.01%

The 2006 Kansas Legislature passed two bills designed to assist those in
need of protective orders. The first would fill the gap of previous statutes by
making contact while being incarcerated a violation of the PFA Act. The
second, took effect January 1, 2007, and allows persons attempting to escape a domestic violence situation to obtain a confidential address from the
Secretary of State’s office to use as a substitute legal mailing address.

2009

8,391

5.38%

2010

8,548

1.87%

2011

8,238

-3.63%

2012

8,422

2.23%

The following information reflects the number of
PFA orders filed with Kansas district courts and reported to the Kansas Office of Judicial Administration.

9000
8500
8000
7500
7000
6500
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012

All temporary, amended and final PFA orders are
entered into the National Crime Information Center
(NCIC) Protection Order File. This database is another tool to assist law enforcement officers in verifying
the existence of an order quickly in order to provide
better enforcement. However, an order does not need
to be entered into NCIC in order to be enforced.

42
43

63

35

62

2

113

56

46

127

7

13

65

3

4

18

23

12

5

68

173

2

52

12

240

8

7

37

Anderson

Atchison

Barber

Barton

Bourbon

Brown

Butler

Chase

Chautauqua

Cherokee

Cheyenne

Clark

Clay

Cloud

Coffey

Comanche

Cowley

Crawford

Decatur

Dickinson

Doniphan

Douglas

Edwards

Elk

Ellis

1996

Allen

County

32

0

2

259

20

36

3

174

53

3

22

26

12

1

3

67

18

6

122

35

55

119

1

42

28

71

1997

28

1

6

231

12

26

3

128

40

1

22

30

16

2

3

56

12

2

92

43

53

136

2

19

14

68

1998

48

7

4

242

22

18

5

134

35

0

14

49

15

8

5

48

9

13

109

32

42

89

3

12

38

67

1999

44

6

6

231

23

26

3

122

57

0

13

38

16

2

12

25

23

6

102

40

31

103

3

14

60

61

2000

40

13

6

297

12

56

7

72

88

4

15

28

18

4

9

34

21

9

130

50

40

104

7

24

42

11

2001

54

8

10

328

19

70

5

105

95

3

16

26

12

4

10

42

10

15

139

43

50

105

6

21

38

29

2002

53

12

4

258

23

66

3

98

82

2

13

23

13

2

15

43

15

9

121

57

24

106

4

32

43

34

2003

62

8

8

213

28

53

9

92

93

0

18

25

26

2

3

52

16

12

121

45

14

84

5

34

37

25

2004

55

10

4

230

14

59

7

93

86

0

32

24

28

1

3

37

9

7

114

47

23

113

13

37

40

20

2005

41

10

8

232

11

62

10

93

124

2

19

20

28

3

2

31

19

4

116

22

21

87

14

29

37

33

2006

33

6

7

215

13

52

9

98

116

1

20

22

20

0

3

32

23

10

115

32

26

112

12

24

30

45

2007

5

6

8

266

12

58

5

101

122

1

28

23

28

3

4

35

18

10

151

28

19

95

9

32

31

32

2008

29

7

5

295

16

61

7

118

93

2

30

25

26

4

3

45

21

11

136

35

27

112

4

45

34

39

2009

38

3

6

296

8

76

5

132

84

2

39

18

27

1

5

35

12

5

122

30

38

96

6

35

31

51

2010

Protection From Abuse Filings by County

42

4

5

310

12

61

10

127

90

4

29

16

24

2

4

40

12

4

105

26

40

116

10

35

21

45

2011

48

4

3

330

7

87

10

112

116

3

24

15

20

4

3

31

13

4

134

30

32

84

17

47

28

55

2012
44

1

4

36

5

0

13

1

7

70

4

0

22

24

0

711

6

12

6

83

1

Gove

Graham

Grant

Gray

Greeley

Greenwood

Hamilton

Harper

Harvey

Haskell

Hodgeman

Jackson

Jefferson

Jewell

Johnson

Kearny

Kingman

Kiowa

Labette

Lane

352

167

Geary

Leavenworth

110

69

Ford

Franklin

122

10

1996

Finney

Ellsworth

County

204

2

91

7

21

6

774

1

23

24

1

1

53

10

4

9

1

2

32

1

0

145

141

103

83

10

1997
8

334

1

72

3

14

4

592

3

20

23

2

1

44

7

5

16

1

0

20

4

2

124

86

92

42

1998

376

1

57

6

8

6

593

5

21

35

0

2

98

13

15

5

1

1

34

0

3

161

125

77

51

10

1999
7

289

0

50

5

11

4

702

3

26

19

0

1

102

10

12

5

0

5

30

4

2

142

83

100

60

2000
4

359

4

41

4

13

12

846

4

34

35

1

0

97

28

4

4

3

7

9

6

1

194

81

118

67

2001
5

350

6

57

4

15

9

852

2

53

59

2

0

60

37

5

12

0

4

4

3

1

159

124

91

91

2002

234

2

34

4

9

7

872

8

63

42

7

5

14

26

6

6

0

1

20

2

2

117

116

58

68

13

2003
6

242

3

43

6

21

8

772

5

31

33

2

2

36

7

6

13

1

1

27

1

0

174

132

53

59

2004

289

4

41

7

16

7

814

4

36

35

4

2

80

9

8

6

0

5

14

5

3

134

142

56

52

10

2005
7

270

5

31

3

16

4

773

2

36

39

3

5

66

15

9

11

2

6

6

4

2

151

109

77

54

2006

284

3

30

2

14

4

727

3

40

32

1

5

65

18

14

2

0

4

21

5

0

137

121

59

36

13

2007
0

253

2

45

2

13

6

786

1

52

27

4

1

56

10

4

8

3

4

19

4

0

128

155

49

36

2008

266

1

51

6

14

6

774

4

38

28

4

5

85

8

3

15

0

0

19

4

9

155

121

38

56

14

2009

258

3

29

6

15

4

790

3

49

30

4

2

98

9

9

8

0

5

20

2

6

162

113

44

72

19

2010

Protection From Abuse Filings by County

234

1

37

3

15

4

698

1

42

27

4

5

91

9

8

10

1

7

15

4

4

133

106

43

53

18

2011

271

2

22

2

14

7

764

0

34

30

4

5

109

4

5

13

0

7

15

5

0

156

99

50

70

17

2012
45

8

95

34

33

37

1

100

10

Lyon

Marion

Marshall

McPherson

Meade

Miami

Mitchell

8

64

2

21

66

6

7

15

11

23

16

1

Nemaha

Neosho

Ness

Norton

Osage

Osborne

Ottawa

Pawnee

Phillips

Pottawatomie

Pratt

Rawlins

Republic

9

198

8

Morton

Reno

22

Morris

149

2

Logan

Montgomery

40

Linn

1996

Lincoln

County
6

3

312

0

10

35

13

27

11

6

63

17

0

93

14

3

14

151

10

119

3

38

32

32

97

7

30

1997
5

3

362

0

17

30

13

23

12

5

52

16

1

61

11

2

24

158

13

123

3

46

28

30

102

7

32

1998
7

4

341

1

17

40

9

28

1

1

78

10

0

84

21

3

9

161

6

101

1

51

35

20

140

8

32

1999
6

4

387

4

27

38

11

24

10

4

76

9

1

84

12

1

24

144

6

89

2

58

22

22

101

11

27

2000
5

10

316

0

15

46

17

27

10

2

63

12

3

42

15

2

9

55

8

147

1

69

30

28

86

8

42

2001
6

6

351

4

25

55

7

15

9

6

61

10

7

32

25

13

13

60

10

99

1

14

27

73

104

11

25

2002
6

3

294

0

32

47

11

33

7

7

54

12

3

49

11

15

19

73

14

112

1

67

16

19

101

12

35

2003
5

10

286

3

19

60

11

24

10

10

56

8

3

45

18

8

21

75

7

133

1

66

18

26

90

11

29

2004
2

3

336

1

35

61

15

34

9

7

60

5

8

28

15

9

12

66

8

97

4

51

21

35

90

7

35

2005
4

8

234

5

25

40

19

20

9

5

81

4

8

23

13

10

0

10

2

76

3

61

16

21

85

5

32

2006
8

9

262

1

22

44

16

18

1

2

76

3

8

25

8

5

0

49

4

84

4

54

16

27

54

5

32

2007
4

4

268

2

28

47

9

26

11

4

55

9

7

42

14

5

9

72

5

74

5

62

22

30

69

6

22

2008
4

8

234

3

37

37

12

31

5

3

77

10

2

36

21

7

12

77

7

56

2

52

19

18

59

9

37

2009
5

5

234

3

34

51

11

28

11

5

80

8

6

53

8

5

7

78

1

73

4

52

17

36

74

9

22

2010

Protection From Abuse Filings by County
2

4

224

4

32

43

5

21

10

3

106

12

3

42

12

5

12

84

5

75

3

51

11

21

77

4

12

2011

1

4

197

5

31

47

24

20

8

2

96

6

7

43

21

9

11

69

8

82

1

58

20

26

65

6

26

2012
46

8

2

20

216

5

Rooks

Rush

Russell

Saline

Scott

72

792

1

11

5

16

5

6

31

26

4

11

5

9

2

43

16

600

7,506

Seward

Shawnee

Sheridan

Sherman

Smith

Stafford

Stanton

Stevens

Sumner

Thomas

Trego

Wabaunsee

Wallace

Washington

Wichita

Wilson

Woodson

Wyandotte

TOTALS

1,419

95

Riley

Sedgwick

16

1996

Rice

County

7,968

743

9

45

3

7

2

5

3

30

32

8

3

4

8

17

1

869

36

1,612

5

269

29

1

8

93

24

1997

7,361

615

14

44

2

7

8

8

1

24

28

8

0

12

1

16

3

850

41

1,583

3

213

29

0

5

83

20

1998

7,691

666

15

42

0

6

2

4

3

27

36

3

0

14

5

21

4

707

53

1,683

2

263

25

1

8

99

16

1999

7,300

815

9

25

1

5

6

6

2

23

37

7

2

12

5

23

3

677

66

1,209

8

248

34

1

7

100

26

2000

8,140

1,041

6

8

2

2

5

14

3

18

62

8

1

9

6

13

3

803

56

1,406

6

297

23

3

10

130

20

2001

8,548

1,148

3

12

1

3

5

9

2

28

57

5

1

6

10

20

5

716

68

1,637

4

294

26

7

9

86

38

2002

7,672

678

5

18

3

5

0

9

2

15

79

3

2

12

10

15

3

628

75

1,746

5

271

24

1

5

92

32

2003

7,914

689

8

11

1

8

5

17

4

17

71

8

2

12

7

11

1

771

75

1,923

4

275

13

3

7

124

33

2004

8,222

685

8

18

1

7

4

8

5

29

65

12

3

9

12

26

3

814

43

2,025

4

306

14

1

7

122

41

2005

7,942

669

8

22

0

6

3

10

2

16

66

7

2

6

8

17

2

808

29

2,156

6

295

27

3

6

114

30

2006

7,903

659

8

19

1

7

2

7

0

33

79

9

3

9

8

14

4

836

48

2,068

7

315

24

2

6

125

45

2007

7,963

613

4

22

2

7

0

7

2

16

63

6

1

16

6

10

4

817

49

2,147

8

249

23

7

5

147

23

2008

8,391

708

8

15

0

7

3

10

4

32

72

4

5

18

9

28

4

760

60

2,317

6

285

16

4

11

145

31

2009

8,548

718

8

33

1

11

1

9

2

16

42

6

6

6

4

20

2

1007

53

2,247

3

260

34

4

13

131

30

2010

Protection From Abuse Filings by County

8,238

680

6

24

2

7

0

9

1

28

49

11

4

10

5

27

3

870

40

2,332

3

246

31

6

11

153

30

2011

8,422

605

9

26

1

4

1

5

4

17

71

7

3

11

12

16

8

913

37

2,315

9

286

24

5

18

135

21

2012
Violation of Protective Order
K.S.A. 21-5924 by County 2012
County

2010 2011 2012

2010 2011 2012

County

County

2012

2011

2010

Greeley

0

0

0

Osborne

0

0

0

4

Greenwood

1

0

2

Ottawa

1

1

0

2

1

Hamilton

DNR DNR

0

Pawnee

9

8

2

0

0

2

Harper

0

2

2

Phillips

2

2

2

Barton

34

38

39

Harvey

41

70

75

24

32

26

Bourbon

21

24

12

Haskell

DNR DNR

0

Pratt

5

2

4

Brown

4

6

7

Rawlins

0

0

0

Butler

27

40

198

120

89

Chase

0

Chautauqua

1

Allen

5

1

11

Anderson

6

3

Atchison

0

Barber

Hodgeman

0

0

1

49

Jackson

7

8

15

Reno

0

1

Jefferson

24

19

17

Republic

1

1

0

0

3

Jewell

Rice

4

10

6

DNR DNR DNR
1

56

44

73

Riley

16

0

0

DNR

1

3

Rooks

1

1

2

Kingman

3

8

2

Rush

1

1

4

6

Kiowa

1

0

2

Russell

5

8

7

3

5

Labette

19

24

12

Saline

0

42

199

7

5

Lane

0

3

0

Scott

2

1

1

1 DNR

0

Leavenworth

110

106

87

Sedgwick

70

59

62

34

48

2

1

0

Seward

16

10

10

20

9

9

Cherokee

6

6

7

Johnson

Cheyenne

4

4

2

Kearny

Clark

0

1

0

Clay

8

7

Cloud

5

Coffey

1

Comanche
Cowley

Pottawatomie

38

Lincoln

1

Linn

3

0

12

Shawnee

0

Logan

4

3

1

Sheridan

0

0

0

33

20

Lyon

2

1

3

Sherman

2

3

0

1

7

1

Marion

18

5

1

Smith

0

Douglas

177

161

129

Marshall

1

0

3

Stafford

0

0

2

Edwards

0

2

0

McPherson

18

19

23

Stanton

0

0

0

Elk

0

2

0

Meade

0

1

0

Stevens

0

0

1

Ellis

31

28

26

Miami

14

10

19

Sumner

14

22

29

2

7

2

Mitchell

3

4

0

Thomas

3

4

7

Finney

17

11

18

Montgomery

7

15

14

Trego

0

0

2

Ford

17

17

17

Morris

1

5

3

Wabaunsee

2

1

1

Franklin

53

22

29

Morton

0

1

0

Wallace

0

0

0

Geary

59

60

64

Nemaha

2

2

2

Washington

1

0

0

Gove

0

0

1

Neosho

15

23

19

Wichita

2

2

0

Graham

0

0

0

Ness

1

0

1

Wilson

9

6

3

Grant

3

1

7

Norton

3

4

3

Woodson

1

3

3

Gray

1

1

1

Osage

38

13

26

Wyandotte 1

9

24

9

12

22

17

0

0

Dickinson

26

Doniphan

Crawford
Decatur

Ellsworth

TOTAL

1) Summary Agencies within this county did not report this data
47

1,372

DNR DNR

1,314

1,435
Protection From Stalking Act
K.S.A. 60-31a01 through 60-31a09
The Kansas Legislature created the Protection from Stalking Act (PFS) during the 2002 session. The statute is
to be “liberally construed to protect victims of stalking and to facilitate access to judicial protection for stalking
victims, whether represented by counsel or proceedings pro se.” The PFS allows the court to refrain a defendant
from harassing, telephoning, contacting or otherwise communicating with the victim. A Protection From Stalking
Order is a court order for the purpose of preventing stalking behavior against the victim. A person seeking relief
under this act may obtain an order from the clerk of the district court in the county where the stalking occurred.
Once an order is filed with the court a temporary order is issued and a hearing is set within 20 days. A final order
may be issued for a period of one year. However, “upon motion by the plaintiff, such a period may be extended for
an additional year.”
The following information reports the number of PFS orders filed with Kansas district courts and reported to
the Kansas Office of Judicial Administration.

Protection From Stalking Orders
Number of Court Filings 2002-2012
YEAR
2002

1

PFA Filings

6,000

1,073

2003

2,577

2004

3,036

2005

3,405

2006

4,093

2007

4,159

2008

4,508

2009

4,756

2010

5,089

2011

5,202

2012

5,066

5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
20 02 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

1) The protection from stalking orders law became effective July 1, 2002. Therefore, the 2002 data is for six months.
48
Protection From Stalking Order
Court Filings by County
County

2010 2011 2012

County

2010 2011 2012

County

2012

2011

2010

8

7

12

Greeley

0

0

1

Osborne

4

0

1

Anderson

13

26

23

Greenwood

1

5

5

Ottawa

2

6

8

Atchison

41

54

30

Hamilton

4

9

2

Pawnee

31

16

11

Barber

26

9

10

Harper

1

3

2

Phillips

10

15

16

Barton

64

72

75

Harvey

22

39

31

Pottawatomie

45

43

55

5

13

9

Haskell

1

1

3

Pratt

15

13

15

Brown

14

12

12

Hodgeman

0

0

2

Rawlins

0

2

0

Butler

53

52

47

Jackson

26

28

31

Reno

128

121

128

Chase

6

7

1

Jefferson

13

28

30

Republic

1

10

7

Chautauqua

7

4

3

Jewell

10

1

3

Rice

20

21

15

Cherokee

1

15

3

Johnson

552

589

487

Riley

157

160

112

Cheyenne

6

1

2

Kearny

3

0

0

Rooks

16

14

11

Clark

3

0

0

Kingman

13

12

8

Rush

8

6

2

Clay

17

13

19

Kiowa

2

1

2

Russell

12

17

19

Cloud

0

5

2

Labette

9

6

3

Saline

243

224

189

Coffey

31

20

35

Lane

3

1

1

Scott

1

9

6

3

6

2

199

200

193

Cowley

43

40

63

Lincoln

0

3

1

Crawford

36

45

44

Linn

8

6

10

Decatur

10

4

18

Logan

5

8

Dickinson

57

66

77

Lyon

43

Doniphan

13

8

2

Marion

Douglas

219

188

243

Marshall

Edwards

3

0

3

McPherson

Elk

3

5

5

Ellis

18

29

3

Finney

Allen

Bourbon

Comanche

Leavenworth

Sedgwick

1,190

1,274 1,201

12

12

10

Shawnee

588

502

518

6

Sheridan

2

0

5

43

51

Sherman

1

5

1

5

10

5

Smith

2

0

0

1

3

1

Stafford

4

4

5

23

23

40

Stanton

0

0

0

Meade

3

1

2

Stevens

4

4

4

35

Miami

54

60

55

Sumner

36

31

74

12

16

Mitchell

1

7

6

Thomas

4

26

10

10

30

19

Montgomery

15

24

11

Trego

3

1

3

Ford

18

16

18

Morris

6

2

8

Wabaunsee

9

6

8

Franklin

71

82

102

Morton

6

5

5

Wallace

0

2

0

Geary

125

96

70

Nemaha

15

6

25

Washington

3

11

6

Gove

0

1

2

Neosho

3

5

9

Wichita

1

2

1

Graham

1

0

2

Ness

8

7

5

Wilson

2

9

5

Grant

2

4

3

Norton

8

3

2

Woodson

0

0

3

Gray

1

1

1

Osage

61

51

51

Wyandotte

480

503

504

Ellsworth

Seward

TOTAL
49

5,089

5,202

5,066
Stalking
Stalking is unlike any other person crime not only in its general characteristics, but also in the impact it has on
the daily lives of victims. Many people do not take the crime of stalking seriously, while others blame the victim.
Stalking is an exercise of control and power over another individual or group. The variation in stalking behavior
ranges from hang-up phone calls to more direct threats toward a victim. The likelihood of injury increases when the
stalking behavior escalates over time.
In 2008, the Kansas Legislature passed, and the Governor signed into law, Senate Bill 414 which expands the
definition of Stalking under K.S.A. This is reflected in the large increase of offenses reported since 2009.
Stalking is defined as:
(1) “Intentionally or recklessly engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person which would
cause a reasonable person in the circumstances of the targeted person to fear for such person’s safety, or the safety
of a member of such person’s immediate family and the targeted person is actually placed in such fear; or
(2) intentionally engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person which the individual knows
will place the targeted person in fear for such person’s safety or the safety of a member of such person’s immediate
family; or
(3) after being served with, or otherwise provided notice of, any protective order included in K.S.A. 213843, prior to its repeal or K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-5924, and amendments thereto, that prohibits contact with a targeted person, recklessly engaging in at least one act listed in subsection (f)(1) that violates the provisions of the
order and would cause a reasonable person to fear for such person's safety, or the safety of a member of such person's immediate family and the targeted person is actually placed in such fear.

YEAR Offenses Percent
Change
2001

199

2002

173

-13.07%

2003

238

37.57%

Stalking Trends 2000-2012

-11.56%
900

777

800

2004

275

15.55%

700

2005

242

-12.00%

600

2006

193

-20.25%

500

2007

211

9.33%

558

400
300

2008

281

33.18%

2009

558

98.58%

592

6.09%

0

2011

777

31.25%

2012

713

238

100

2010

225
199

-8.24%

200

173

50

275

281
242

193

211

592

713
Stalking
Victim and Offender Characteristics
Victim (Agencies that filled out summary sheets are not included. Incidents may include more than one victim or suspect)
Age

Female Male

Unknown Total

White

Black

Indian

Asian

Unknown Total

% of Total

Under 10

3

4

0

7

7

0

0

0

0

7

1.2%

10-14

7

6

0

13

13

0

0

0

0

13

2.3%

15-19

52

6

0

58

58

0

0

0

0

58

10.2%

20-24

79

11

0

90

81

7

0

2

0

90

15.8%

25-29

92

8

0

100

95

4

0

1

0

100

17.5%

30-34

83

19

0

102

98

4

0

0

0

102

17.9%

35-39

54

8

0

62

57

2

3

0

0

62

10.9%

40-44

30

12

0

42

39

3

0

0

0

42

7.4%

45-49

32

4

0

36

34

2

0

0

0

36

6.3%

50-54

21

4

0

25

24

1

0

0

0

25

4.4%

55-59

11

5

0

16

14

2

0

0

0

16

2.8%

60-64

5

3

0

8

8

0

0

0

0

8

1.4%

65-69

3

0

0

3

3

0

0

0

0

3

0.5%

70-74

3

1

0

4

3

0

0

1

0

4

0.7%

75 Plus

1

2

0

3

3

0

0

0

0

3

0.5%

Unknown

2

0

0

2

2

0

0

0

0

2

0.4%

478

93

0

571

539

25

3

4

0

571

Total

Suspect (Agencies that filled out summary sheets are not included. Incidents may include more than one victim or suspect)
Age

Female Male

Unknown Total

White

Black

Indian

Asian

Unknown Total

% of Total

Under 10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

10-14

1

1

0

2

1

1

0

0

0

2

0.4%

15-19

12

32

0

44

38

6

0

0

0

44

8.2%

20-24

13

38

0

51

48

2

0

0

1

51

9.5%

25-29

11

70

0

81

70

10

0

0

1

81

15.0%

30-34

7

84

0

91

79

10

0

2

0

91

16.9%

35-39

9

60

0

69

58

6

3

0

2

69

12.8%

40-44

8

58

0

66

63

3

0

0

0

66

12.2%

45-49

5

26

0

31

30

1

0

0

0

31

5.8%

50-54

7

27

0

34

30

4

0

0

0

34

6.3%

55-59

1

10

0

11

11

0

0

0

0

11

2.0%

60-64

3

12

0

15

14

0

0

0

1

15

2.8%

65-69

1

7

0

8

7

1

0

0

0

8

1.5%

70-74

0

3

0

3

2

1

0

0

0

3

0.6%

75 Plus

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

Unknown

6

13

14

33

10

6

0

1

16

33

6.1%

84

441

14

539

461

51

3

3

21

539

Total

51
Stalking
Victim to Offender Relationship
Relationship

2012

Percent
of Total

2011

Percent
of Total

2010

Percent
of Total

43

5.52%

81

9.42%

39

Common Law Spouse

6

0.77%

8

0.93%

5

0.75%

Parent

6

0.77%

5

0.58%

1

0.15%

Child

13

1.67%

18

2.09%

7

1.05%

Sibling

2

0.26%

3

0.35%

5

0.75%

Grandparent

3

0.39%

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

Grandchild

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

In-Law

6

0.77%

6

0.70%

7

1.05%

Step-parent

2

0.26%

3

0.35%

1

0.15%

Step-child

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

1

0.15%

Step-sibling

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

0

0.0%

Foster Parent

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

0

0.0%

Foster Child

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

0

0.0%

Foster Sibling

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

0

0.0%

10

1.28%

8

0.93%

3

0.45%

149

19.13%

145

16.86%

111

16.72%

Friend

7

0.90%

15

1.74%

15

2.26%

Roommates

0

0.00%

1

0.12%

1

0.15%

24

3.08%

18

2.09%

8

1.20%

Boyfriend/Girlfriend

103

13.22%

152

17.67%

88

13.25%

Ex-Boyfriend/Girlfriend

157

20.15%

98

11.40%

145

21.84%

Child of Boyfriend/
Girlfriend

1

0.13%

3

0.35%

1

0.15%

BF/GF of Suspect’s Parent

2

0.26%

0

0.00%

1

0.15%

Homosexual Relationship

3

0.39%

3

0.35%

2

0.30%

88

11.30%

94

10.93%

75

11.30%

Employer/Employee

4

0.51%

3

0.35%

1

0.15%

Co-Worker

5

0.64%

1

0.12%

2

0.30%

Otherwise Known

70

8.99%

91

10.58%

64

9.64%

Relationship Unknown

49

6.29%

75

8.72%

54

8.13%

Stranger

26

3.34%

29

3.37%

27

4.07%

TOTAL

779

2012 Current vs. Former Dating

5.87%

Spouse

Other Family Member
Acquaintance

Neighbor

Dating
40%
Ex-Dating
60%

2012 Current vs. Former Spouse

Spouse
33%

ExSpouse
67%

2012 Known vs. Unknown
Unknown
10%

Known
90%

Relationship: 3yr Trend

2012

2011

Ex-Spouse

860

664
52

2010

0

50

Ex-Dating

100

150

200

Dating
Stalking
Location of Offense
Location

2012

Percent
of Total

2011

Percent
of Total

2010

Percent
of Total

Business/Residential

Parking Lot/Garage

16

2.24%

20

2.57%

15

2.53%

Street

88

12.34%

72

9.27%

48

8.11%

Alley

1

0.14%

4

0.51%

0

0.00%

Highway

4

0.56%

1

0.13%

3

0.51%

Rural Road

1

0.14%

6

0.77%

3

0.51%

383

53.72%

421

54.18%

326

55.07%

93

13.04%

123

15.83%

76

12.84%

Nursing Care Facility

1

0.14%

6

0.77%

0

0.00%

Dormitory/Sorority/Fraternity

2

0.28%

3

0.39%

4

0.68%

College/University/Propriety School

8

1.12%

7

0.90%

12

2.03%

12

1.68%

12

1.54%

11

1.86%

Church/Synagogue/Temple

2

0.28%

1

0.13%

2

0.34%

Government/Tax-Payer Funded Bldg

8

1.12%

13

1.67%

8

1.35%

Jail/Prison

1

0.14%

8

1.03%

7

1.18%

Hospital

3

0.42%

2

0.26%

2

0.34%

Pharmacy/Doctor’s Office

1

0.14%

0

0.00%

4

0.68%

Bank/Savings and Loan

2

0.28%

5

0.64%

2

0.34%

17

2.38%

17

2.19%

15

2.53%

Service/Gas Station

7

0.98%

4

0.51%

2

0.34%

Convenience Store

6

0.84%

9

1.16%

9

1.52%

Department/Discount Store

8

1.12%

9

1.16%

8

1.35%

Grocery/Supermarket

7

0.98%

6

0.77%

6

1.01%

Specialty Store

7

0.98%

6

0.77%

6

1.01%

Mall Commons

0

0.00%

2

0.26%

1

0.17%

Open Space

Tavern/Bar/Liquor Store

3

0.42%

5

0.64%

3

0.51%

Residential

16

2.24%

3

0.39%

4

0.68%

Hotel/Motel/Inn

5

0.70%

2

0.26%

4

0.68%

Air/Bus Terminal

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

1

0.17%

Storage/Warehouse

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

Park Buildings/Shelters

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

Open Area

2

0.28%

3

0.39%

1

0.17%

Lake/Waterway/River

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

Other

8

1.12%

7

0.90%

7

1.18%

Casino

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

2

0.34%

Recreational Facility

1

0.14%

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

Car Wash

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

0

0.00%

Single Residence
Multiple Residence

All Other Schools

Commercial Office Building

Restaurant

TOTAL

713

777
53

592

Business
16%
Open Space
16%

Residential
68%

Roads
Rural Road
4%

Highway
4%

Parking Lot
22%

Street
70%

Residential
Multiple
20%

Single
80%

Location: 3yr Trend
2012
2011
2010
Business

0

200

400

600
Stalking
Day of Offense
Day of the Week :Offense
Day

2012

Percent of
Total

2011

Percent of
Total

2010

Percent of
Total

Sunday

100

14.03%

94

12.10%

74

12.50%

Monday

94

13.18%

117

15.06%

85

14.36%

Tuesday

97

13.60%

125

16.09%

84

14.19%

118

16.55%

95

12.23%

91

15.37%

Thursday

99

13.88%

105

13.51%

90

15.20%

Friday

94

13.18%

118

15.19%

93

15.71%

Saturday

111

15.57%

123

15.83%

75

12.67%

TOTAL

713

Wednesday

777

592

Stalking: Day of Offense 3yr Trend

140
120
100
80
2010
60

2011
2012

40
20
0

54
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas
DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

00 Arrest Networks and the Spread of Violent Victimization
00 Arrest Networks and the Spread of Violent Victimization00 Arrest Networks and the Spread of Violent Victimization
00 Arrest Networks and the Spread of Violent VictimizationDuke Network Analysis Center
 
Cja 498 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 498 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comCja 498 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 498 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comStephenson26
 
HCC Police Department 2018 Annual Clery Security Report
HCC Police Department 2018 Annual Clery Security ReportHCC Police Department 2018 Annual Clery Security Report
HCC Police Department 2018 Annual Clery Security ReportHouston Community College
 
Precursors-of-Crime-Report
Precursors-of-Crime-ReportPrecursors-of-Crime-Report
Precursors-of-Crime-ReportFletcher Damon
 
Peace Officer v5 (1)
Peace Officer v5 (1)Peace Officer v5 (1)
Peace Officer v5 (1)Linda Bryant
 
LGBT Domestic Violence Report
LGBT Domestic Violence ReportLGBT Domestic Violence Report
LGBT Domestic Violence ReportSkyler Saunders
 
Unit 8 project identifying crime patterns e hall
Unit 8 project identifying  crime patterns e hallUnit 8 project identifying  crime patterns e hall
Unit 8 project identifying crime patterns e hallElizabeth Hall
 
Cja 235 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 235 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comCja 235 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 235 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comStephenson21
 
Police Killings in America
Police Killings in AmericaPolice Killings in America
Police Killings in AmericaMaxwell Pederson
 

La actualidad más candente (15)

Police bruitality
Police bruitalityPolice bruitality
Police bruitality
 
00 Arrest Networks and the Spread of Violent Victimization
00 Arrest Networks and the Spread of Violent Victimization00 Arrest Networks and the Spread of Violent Victimization
00 Arrest Networks and the Spread of Violent Victimization
 
Cja 498 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 498 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comCja 498 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 498 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
 
Crim methods2
Crim methods2Crim methods2
Crim methods2
 
Domestic Violence Homicide Report
Domestic Violence Homicide ReportDomestic Violence Homicide Report
Domestic Violence Homicide Report
 
HCC Police Department 2018 Annual Clery Security Report
HCC Police Department 2018 Annual Clery Security ReportHCC Police Department 2018 Annual Clery Security Report
HCC Police Department 2018 Annual Clery Security Report
 
Precursors-of-Crime-Report
Precursors-of-Crime-ReportPrecursors-of-Crime-Report
Precursors-of-Crime-Report
 
Police Brutality
Police BrutalityPolice Brutality
Police Brutality
 
Peace Officer v5 (1)
Peace Officer v5 (1)Peace Officer v5 (1)
Peace Officer v5 (1)
 
Crime statistics uses
Crime statistics  usesCrime statistics  uses
Crime statistics uses
 
LGBT Domestic Violence Report
LGBT Domestic Violence ReportLGBT Domestic Violence Report
LGBT Domestic Violence Report
 
BloodRelative
BloodRelativeBloodRelative
BloodRelative
 
Unit 8 project identifying crime patterns e hall
Unit 8 project identifying  crime patterns e hallUnit 8 project identifying  crime patterns e hall
Unit 8 project identifying crime patterns e hall
 
Cja 235 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 235 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comCja 235 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 235 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
 
Police Killings in America
Police Killings in AmericaPolice Killings in America
Police Killings in America
 

Similar a DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas

Crime Rate And Crime Rates
Crime Rate And Crime RatesCrime Rate And Crime Rates
Crime Rate And Crime RatesKrystal Green
 
96Chapter OutlineStudying CrimesHomicideHomicide a.docx
96Chapter OutlineStudying CrimesHomicideHomicide a.docx96Chapter OutlineStudying CrimesHomicideHomicide a.docx
96Chapter OutlineStudying CrimesHomicideHomicide a.docxsleeperharwell
 
Be Prepared: Get the Real Facts on Crime
Be Prepared: Get the Real Facts on CrimeBe Prepared: Get the Real Facts on Crime
Be Prepared: Get the Real Facts on CrimeChristian Watson
 
NorthCarolina_WakeCounty_AnnualReport_2014
NorthCarolina_WakeCounty_AnnualReport_2014NorthCarolina_WakeCounty_AnnualReport_2014
NorthCarolina_WakeCounty_AnnualReport_2014Lisa Allred
 
Mapping Business Challenges to Types of Control © 201.docx
Mapping Business Challenges to Types of Control © 201.docxMapping Business Challenges to Types of Control © 201.docx
Mapping Business Challenges to Types of Control © 201.docxgertrudebellgrove
 
3Victimization inthe United StatesAn OverviewCHAPTE.docx
3Victimization inthe United StatesAn OverviewCHAPTE.docx3Victimization inthe United StatesAn OverviewCHAPTE.docx
3Victimization inthe United StatesAn OverviewCHAPTE.docxlorainedeserre
 
Sexual Assault Training (2017)
Sexual Assault Training (2017)Sexual Assault Training (2017)
Sexual Assault Training (2017)Arete-Zoe, LLC
 

Similar a DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas (9)

Crime Rate And Crime Rates
Crime Rate And Crime RatesCrime Rate And Crime Rates
Crime Rate And Crime Rates
 
96Chapter OutlineStudying CrimesHomicideHomicide a.docx
96Chapter OutlineStudying CrimesHomicideHomicide a.docx96Chapter OutlineStudying CrimesHomicideHomicide a.docx
96Chapter OutlineStudying CrimesHomicideHomicide a.docx
 
Be Prepared: Get the Real Facts on Crime
Be Prepared: Get the Real Facts on CrimeBe Prepared: Get the Real Facts on Crime
Be Prepared: Get the Real Facts on Crime
 
NorthCarolina_WakeCounty_AnnualReport_2014
NorthCarolina_WakeCounty_AnnualReport_2014NorthCarolina_WakeCounty_AnnualReport_2014
NorthCarolina_WakeCounty_AnnualReport_2014
 
Mapping Business Challenges to Types of Control © 201.docx
Mapping Business Challenges to Types of Control © 201.docxMapping Business Challenges to Types of Control © 201.docx
Mapping Business Challenges to Types of Control © 201.docx
 
Essay About Crimes
Essay About CrimesEssay About Crimes
Essay About Crimes
 
3Victimization inthe United StatesAn OverviewCHAPTE.docx
3Victimization inthe United StatesAn OverviewCHAPTE.docx3Victimization inthe United StatesAn OverviewCHAPTE.docx
3Victimization inthe United StatesAn OverviewCHAPTE.docx
 
Sexual assault (2017)
Sexual assault (2017)Sexual assault (2017)
Sexual assault (2017)
 
Sexual Assault Training (2017)
Sexual Assault Training (2017)Sexual Assault Training (2017)
Sexual Assault Training (2017)
 

Más de Keri Strahler

7.12.12 TANF work requirement letter
7.12.12 TANF work requirement letter 7.12.12 TANF work requirement letter
7.12.12 TANF work requirement letter Keri Strahler
 
Us.report.letter.to.obama.(final)
Us.report.letter.to.obama.(final)Us.report.letter.to.obama.(final)
Us.report.letter.to.obama.(final)Keri Strahler
 
2013 DRC Newsletter
2013 DRC Newsletter 2013 DRC Newsletter
2013 DRC Newsletter Keri Strahler
 
The strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking act
The strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking actThe strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking act
The strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking actKeri Strahler
 
Pornography and Crime
Pornography and CrimePornography and Crime
Pornography and CrimeKeri Strahler
 
Hutchinson News - Editorial Copy Fees
Hutchinson News - Editorial Copy FeesHutchinson News - Editorial Copy Fees
Hutchinson News - Editorial Copy FeesKeri Strahler
 
SB 10 Testimony - Jan Jarman
SB 10 Testimony - Jan JarmanSB 10 Testimony - Jan Jarman
SB 10 Testimony - Jan JarmanKeri Strahler
 
SB 10 Testimony - Tomari Quinn
SB 10 Testimony - Tomari QuinnSB 10 Testimony - Tomari Quinn
SB 10 Testimony - Tomari QuinnKeri Strahler
 
Property and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased Disinheritance
Property and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased DisinheritanceProperty and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased Disinheritance
Property and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased DisinheritanceKeri Strahler
 
CPJ - Roots Of Impunity ..
CPJ - Roots Of Impunity ..CPJ - Roots Of Impunity ..
CPJ - Roots Of Impunity ..Keri Strahler
 
H.R. 1229 To promote economic security ..
H.R. 1229 To promote economic security .. H.R. 1229 To promote economic security ..
H.R. 1229 To promote economic security .. Keri Strahler
 

Más de Keri Strahler (16)

7.12.12 TANF work requirement letter
7.12.12 TANF work requirement letter 7.12.12 TANF work requirement letter
7.12.12 TANF work requirement letter
 
Oei 07-98-00260
Oei 07-98-00260Oei 07-98-00260
Oei 07-98-00260
 
Letter From DCF
Letter From DCFLetter From DCF
Letter From DCF
 
Us.report.letter.to.obama.(final)
Us.report.letter.to.obama.(final)Us.report.letter.to.obama.(final)
Us.report.letter.to.obama.(final)
 
Ss06 03-038
Ss06 03-038Ss06 03-038
Ss06 03-038
 
2013 DRC Newsletter
2013 DRC Newsletter 2013 DRC Newsletter
2013 DRC Newsletter
 
The strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking act
The strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking actThe strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking act
The strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking act
 
Pornography and Crime
Pornography and CrimePornography and Crime
Pornography and Crime
 
99818
9981899818
99818
 
Hutchinson News - Editorial Copy Fees
Hutchinson News - Editorial Copy FeesHutchinson News - Editorial Copy Fees
Hutchinson News - Editorial Copy Fees
 
SB10
SB10SB10
SB10
 
SB 10 Testimony - Jan Jarman
SB 10 Testimony - Jan JarmanSB 10 Testimony - Jan Jarman
SB 10 Testimony - Jan Jarman
 
SB 10 Testimony - Tomari Quinn
SB 10 Testimony - Tomari QuinnSB 10 Testimony - Tomari Quinn
SB 10 Testimony - Tomari Quinn
 
Property and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased Disinheritance
Property and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased DisinheritanceProperty and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased Disinheritance
Property and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased Disinheritance
 
CPJ - Roots Of Impunity ..
CPJ - Roots Of Impunity ..CPJ - Roots Of Impunity ..
CPJ - Roots Of Impunity ..
 
H.R. 1229 To promote economic security ..
H.R. 1229 To promote economic security .. H.R. 1229 To promote economic security ..
H.R. 1229 To promote economic security ..
 

DV, Stalking and Rape Report for Kansas

  • 1. Domestic Violence, Stalking, and Rape In Kansas As Reported by Law Enforcement Agencies 2012 Prepared by: Kansas Bureau of Investigation Kirk D. Thompson, Director 1620 SW Tyler Topeka, Kansas 66612 785.296.8200
  • 2. This project was supported by Grant Award No. 2011-WF-AX-0036, awarded to the State of Kansas by the Federal Office on Violence Against Women, Office of Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice or the Office of the Kansas Governor. This grant is administered by the Governor’s Grants Program. 2
  • 3. Table of Contents Introduction . . . . 4 Domestic Violence . . . . . . . . . . . . Kansas Domestic Violence Incident and Arrest Trend, 1992 - 2012 . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 6 7 Kansas Domestic Violence Homicide Trend, 1992 - 2012 . . . . . . . 8 Murder, Victim / Suspect Relationship, By Age, Sex, and Race . . . . 10 Domestic Violence Crime Clock . . . . . . 12 Kansas Reported Domestic Violence Incidents by Agency, 2010 - 2012 . . . 13 Domestic Violence, Victim/Offender Characteristics . . . . . . . 32 Domestic Violence, Relationship of Victim to Offender . . . . . . 33 . . . . . . . Domestic Violence, Location of Incident . . . . . . . 34 . . . . . 35 Domestic Violence, Weapon Used . . . . . . Domestic Violence, Type of Injury . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Domestic Violence, Day of Occurrence, Chart and Graph . . . . . . 37 Domestic Violence, Twenty-Four Hour Trend, Chart and Graph . . . . 38 Domestic Violence, Statute Violations . . . . . . . . . . 39 Protection From Abuse Orders . . . . Number of Filings Trend Graph, 1994 - 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 42 Number of Filings by County, 1996 - 2012 . . . . . . . . . 43 Reported Violations of Protection of Abuse by County . . . . . . 47 Protection From Stalking Act . . . . Number of Filings Trend Graph 2002-2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 48 . . . . . . . . 49 Stalking . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of Violations Reported to Law Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 50 Number of Court Filings by County . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Stalking, Relationship of Victim to Offender . . . . . . . . . 52 . . . . . . . . 53 . . . . . . . . 54 Stalking, Twenty-Four Hour Trend, Chart and Graph . . . . . . . 55 . . . . . . . . . . 56 57 Stalking, Victim/Offender Characteristics . Stalking, Location of Incident . . Stalking, Day of Occurrence, Chart and Graph Rape . . . . . . . . . . . Kansas Rape Trend, 1992- 2012, Chart and Graph . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Kansas Reported Rape Incidents by Agency, 2010 - 2012 . . . . . . 59 Rape, Victim / Offender Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . 77 Rape, Relationship of Victim to Offender . . . . . . . . . 78 Rape, Location of Incident . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 Rape, Weapon Used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Rape, Type of Injury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Rape, Day of Occurrence, Chart and Graph . . . . . . . . . 82 Rape, Twenty-Four Hour Trend, Chart and Graph . . . . . . . 83 . . . . . . . 84 Rape Crime Clock Resources For Victims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
  • 4. Introduction Governor Sam Brownback’s office administers the Federal S.T.O.P. Violence Against Women Act grant program and provides grant funds to the Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI) to facilitate the data entry of the Kansas Standard Offense Reports and the Kansas Standard Arrest Reports relating to crimes of domestic violence and rape. This report is based on 2012 statistical data as submitted by Kansas law enforcement agencies. This report is intended to assist agencies in strengthening the criminal justice system which holds offenders accountable for their actions and provides resources to help respond to these crimes. The KBI compiled the following report on domestic violence, stalking and rape statistics for 2012. The data represents the truest and most accurate information available, reflecting domestic violence and rape as reported by law enforcement agencies through the Kansas Incident Based Reporting System (KIBRS). This system enables crime information from standard offense and arrest reports to be obtained manually, electronically and directly from Kansas law enforcement agencies. This report does not claim to represent all domestic violence incidents, stalking offenses, or rapes committed throughout the State of Kansas, as it is dependent on victims to report crimes to law enforcement agencies and for these agencies to submit incident reports to the KBI. Only domestic violence, stalking, and rape incident and arrest reports that were submitted to the KBI were counted for this report. Since 1992, all Kansas law enforcement agencies have been required to make mandatory arrests for domestic violence incidents when there is probable cause that a crime was committed. Officers also are required to fill out a KIBRS report for every domestic violence incident, whether or not an arrest was made. Each law enforcement agency is required to have a written policy describing its protocol for addressing domestic violence incidents. Effective in July of 2011, the state legislature passed a bill creating a universal definition for domestic violence incidents. This definition is to be used by all Kansas law enforcement agencies. The new definition can be found on page 6 of this publication. OFFENSES The domestic violence section of this report includes, but is not limited to, offenses that involve: murder, assault, aggravated assault, assault on a law enforcement officer, aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer, battery, aggravated battery, battery on a law enforcement officer, aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer, rape, theft, unlawful deprivation of property, burglary and aggravated burglary. The statutes listed in the report may not include all domestic violence related crimes, but do include the majority. 4
  • 5. Introduction DUAL ARRESTS The domestic violence section of this report includes “dual arrests” which refers to cases where more than one person was arrested for the same domestic violence incident. In a number of cases, this is the result of an incident where the primary aggressor cannot be determined so both parties involved are arrested. There also may be a number of cases in which multiple arrests were made at the incident because a third party may have intervened. Because of this “dual arrest” procedure, some agencies have reported more arrests than incidents in a particular year. By factoring in dual arrests, a more accurate arrest percentage can be reported. TABLES AND GRAPHS Several tables and graphs regarding domestic violence, stalking, and rape crimes, as well as victim and offenders, are included in this report. Some domestic violence, stalking, and rape incidents may have had more than one offense, victim, offender, type of weapon, or victim-offender relationship. Some KIBRS reports were not filled out completely, making detailed information on the incident unknown or unavailable. With this in mind, not all totals for each section will always match. In order to present the most accurate representation of domestic violence, stalking, and rape, without misinterpreting the data, the information for this report was recorded as it was reported to the KBI by law enforcement agencies as of June 30, 2013. Hopefully law enforcement agencies, domestic violence programs and sexual assault centers across the State of Kansas will work together to develop effective policies, procedures and training activities to assist those involved in responding to the crimes of domestic violence, stalking, and rape. AGENCIES NOT REPORTING COMPLETE DATA If an agency does not submit any data a “DNR” is indicated. If an agency does not report complete data, the data is included but the agency is flagged to recognize this discrepancy. This change will more accurately depict the true activity within each agency and county. Data is listed as questionable when a large decline in submissions occurs without confirmation by the local agency. 5
  • 6. Domestic Violence In 1991, the Kansas Legislature enacted mandates that required all Kansas law enforcement agencies to adopt written policies regarding their procedures for responding to domestic violence incidents within their jurisdictions. Each law enforcement policy must include a directive that officers who have probable cause that a crime was committed at a domestic violence incident “shall make an arrest.” All standard offense reports were required to be submitted to the Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI) beginning in January 1992, whether or not an arrest was made. Since this legislative action, Kansas law enforcement agencies have increased arrest rates for domestic violence related crimes from 37.09 percent in 1992 to 54.1 percent in 2012. Victim and offender characteristics for domestic violence have not changed drastically. Still, the average victim is a white female between the ages of 20 and 24. The average offender is a white male between the ages of 20 and 29 and is most often the spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend of the victim. Saturdays and Sundays are the two days when domestic violence incidents are most likely to occur. While most incidents occur between the hours of midnight and 4:00 a.m. Domestic violence can be defined as any verbal and/or physical abuse ranging from simple assault to murder. More than 55 percent of all domestic violence incidents involve the criminal offense of battery. Battery is defined as “intentionally or recklessly causing bodily harm to another person or intentionally causing physical contact with another person when done in a rude, insulting or angry manner.” In 2001, the Kansas Legislature enacted the “domestic battery” statute which is “(1) intentionally or recklessly causing bodily harm by a family or household member against a family or household member; or (2) intentionally causing physical contact with a family or household member by a family or household member when done in a rude, insulting or angry manner.” Most domestic violence offenders use some type of bodily force against their victims and most use their hands, fists, or feet as personal weapons. An incident of domestic violence most often occurs at home. Almost half (47.6 percent) of all victims receive physical injuries severe enough to cause visible abrasions. "Domestic violence" means an act or threatened act of violence against a person with whom the offender is involved or has been involved in a dating relationship, or an act or threatened act of violence against a family or household member by a family or household member. Domestic violence also includes any other crime committed against a person or against property, or any municipal ordinance violation against a person or against property, when directed against a person with whom the offender is involved or has been involved in a dating relationship or when directed against a family or household member by a family or household member. For the purposes of this definition: (1) "Dating relationship" means a social relationship of a romantic nature. In addition to any other factors the court deems relevant, the trier of fact may consider the following when making a determination of whether a relationship exists or existed: Nature of the relationship, length of time the relationship existed, frequency of interaction between the parties and time since termination of the relationship, if applicable. (2) "Family or household member" means persons 18 years of age or older who are spouses, former spouses, parents or stepparents and children or stepchildren, and persons who are presently residing together or have resided together in the past, and persons who have a child in common regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time. Family or household member also includes a man and woman if the woman is pregnant and the man is alleged to be the father, regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time. 6
  • 7. Kansas Domestic Violence Incident and Arrest Trend YEAR NUMBER OF INCIDENTS PERCENT OF CHANGE 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20,817 16,690 18,775 20,183 19,653 19,159 18,966 20,901 23,236 19,870 22,434 18,287 18,042 19,222 23,077 22,429 21,500 23,864 23,828 24,159 24,373 INCIDENTS PER / 1,000 POPULATION NA -19.8% 12.5% 7.5% -2.6% -2.5% -1.0% 10.2% 11.2% -14.5% 12.9% -18.5% -1.3% 6.5% 20.1% - 2.8% - 4.1% 11.0% - 0.2% 1.4% 0.9% NUMBER OF INCIDENTS WITH ARRESTS 8.3 6.6 7.4 7.9 7.6 7.4 7.2 8.0 8.6 7.4 8.3 6.7 6.7 7.0 8.4 8.1 7.7 8.5 8.3 8.2 8.2 7,721 10,971 10,408 10,740 10,366 11,083 10,958 10,958 15,136 11,406 11,474 10,373 9,833 10,951 11,754 11,423 11,887 12,584 14,194 13,478 13,193 30,000 25,000 20,000 Inc id en ts 15,000 C le are d b y Arre st 10,000 5,000 0 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 Year 7 2006 2008 2010 2012
  • 8. Kansas Domestic Violence Homicide Trend Since 1992, Kansas law enforcement agencies have been required to submit a standard offense report to the KBI on domestic violence incidents whether or not an arrest was made. The intent of the law is to collect information and respond to domestic violence among adult intimates and adult family members. The following chart indicates the number of domestic violence homicides that occurred in Kansas between 1992 - 2012. The victims included are spouses, former spouses, persons in intimate relationships whether on-going or in the past, and persons 18 years of age or older who are blood or step-related to one another. Starting in 1999, only adults who have been killed in a domestic violence situation are reported in this statistical information. Cases involving children are reviewed by the State Child Death Review Board (SCDRB) and statistical information can be found in the SCDRB report at www.ksag.org. Due to technical issues, 1995 data has been omitted because it only contains six months of data. Total homicide data are not available for 1999. YEAR DV-Homicides Annual Percent of Change Incident per 1,000 Population 1992 27 NA 0.01 122 22.13% 1993 41 51.9% 0.02 188 21.81% 1994 34 -17.1% 0.01 171 19.88% 1996 22 -35.3% 0.01 159 13.84% 1997 22 0.0% 0.01 150 14.67% 1998 26 18.2% 0.01 172 15.12% 1999 22 -15.4% 0.01 NA NA 2000 26 18.2% 0.01 156 16.67% 2001 15 -42.3% 0.01 142 10.56% 2002 18 20.0% 0.01 106 16.98% 2003 15 -16.7% 0.01 121 12.40% 2004 25 66.7% 0.01 122 20.49% 2005 21 -16.0% 0.01 107 19.63% 2006 21 0.0% 0.01 123 17.07% 2007 17 -19.0% 0.01 115 14.78% 2008 19 11.8% 0.01 128 14.84% 2009 35 84.2% 0.01 130 26.92% 2010 32 -8.6% 0.01 105 30.5% 2011 28 -12.5% 0.01 116 24.1% 2012 24 -14.3% 0.01 91 26.4% 8 Total Homicides Percent DV Related
  • 9. Kansas Domestic Violence Homicide Trend Charts Domestic Violence Homicides 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 41 35 34 27 26 26 28 25 22 22 15 18 24 21 21 15 32 17 19 Percent of Homicides DV Related 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 9
  • 10. 10 M M F F F F F F W W H W W B B W M F W M F F F F M M F F M M F M F W Victim Sex Victim Race B B W W W W B W H W A W W W 78 77 61 38 51 34 38 38 49 41 22 48 39 41 31 41 43 52 29 35 35 66 27 56 Victim Age Grandparent Grandparent Spouse Spouse Sibling Spouse Girlfriend In-Law Girlfriend Spouse Girlfriend Spouse Girlfriend Sibling Boyfriend Girlfriend Girlfriend Spouse Girlfriend Spouse Girlfriend Parent of Ex-GF Boyfriend Ex-Spouse Victim Relationship Handgun Handgun Knife Handgun Firearm Handgun Blunt Object Handgun Handgun Rifle Handgun Handgun Personal Knife Firearm Handgun Handgun Asphyxiation Personal Asphyxiation Knife Firearm Motor Vehicle Handgun Weapons Used Argument Argument Argument Argument Argument Argument Argument Argument Argument Argument Argument Other Circumstance Other Circumstance Argument Argument Other Felony Argument Argument Unknown Argument Argument Argument Argument Argument Circumstances W W W A W H W W W W W W W B W W B B B H H W W W Suspect Race M M M F M M M M F M M M M M F M M M M M M M F M 39 39 55 37 56 32 41 29 21 42 26 55 44 50 Unknown 47 44 57 38 37 39 32 23 58 Suspect Sex Suspect Age Domestic Violence Homicides Relationship, Age, Sex, Race 2012 Sedgwick Sedgwick Sedgwick Sedgwick Johnson Shawnee Sedgwick Wyandotte Montgomery Reno Shawnee Johnson Johnson Shawnee Barber Sedgwick Wyandotte Shawnee Wyandotte Johnson Sedgwick Leavenworth Sedgwick Johnson County
  • 11. 11 15 Male 10 8 2 4 Spouse (inc Ex and Common Law) Immediate Family (parent/child/sib) Other Spouse/Ex 33% Boyfriend/Girlfriend BF/GF 42% Im Family 21% Other 4% Victim’s Relationship Was 9 Female Female 63% Male 37% Victim: Male/Female 15 Personal (Hands, Fist, Feet) 2 4 Firearm 62% Personal (Hands, Fist, Feet) Personal 8% 4 20 3 Knife 13% Weapon Used Argument 83% Knife Firearms Other 17% Other Argument O ther 1 7% Circumstances Hispanic 8% 5 2 Victim’s Age Black 21% 30s 33% 6 8 3 3 40s 25% 4 50-59 40-49 30-39 20-29 50s 13% Other 20s 12% 1 White Other 17% 16 Hispanic Black White 67% Asian 4% Race/Ethnicity Domestic Violence Homicides Relationship, Age, Sex, Race 2012 Over 59
  • 12. Domestic Violence Crime Clock 2012 One Domestic Violence Murder Occurred every 15.0 Days One Domestic Violence Incident Occurred Every 21 Minutes, 36 Seconds Law Enforcement Made One Domestic Violence Arrest Every 39 Minutes, 48 Seconds These crime clocks should be viewed with care. Being the most aggregate representation of crime data, it is designed to convey the annual crime experience by showing the relative frequency of occurrence of crime incident. This mode of display should not be taken to imply a regularity in the commission of these incidents; rather, it represents the annual ratio of crime to fixed time intervals. 12
  • 13. 13 0 County Total 155 127 Fort Scott PD County Total 28 Bourbon County SO 318 1 23 Hoisington PD Claflin PD 263 Great Bend PD 3 4 27 Ellinwood PD Barton County SO County Total 27 59 44 15 190 1 15 156 2 16 11 7 19 Medicine Lodge PD 3 5 Kiowa PD 1 72 3 109 60 12 27 DNR 14 13 112 0 86 4 22 3 3 0 12 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 4 DNR 1 3 12 0 11 0 1 36.1% 32.3% 53.6% 56.0% 100.0% 60.9% 55.1% 50.0% 59.3% 40.7% 36.8% 60.0% 33.3% 63.3% 61.1% 78.6% 56.1% DNR 59.1% 52.6% 84.0% NA 90.4% 80.0% 67.7% DNR 24 11 192 176 76 55 46 130 21 295 2 8 2 152 25 15 15 13 9 0 4 66 52 220 20 28 27 23 0 4 86 69 14 44 17 35 DNR 30 14 0 166 0 103 10 53 3 2 1 24 0 2 17 3 2 0 0 0 0 6 3 3 4 DNR 2 2 26 0 11 0 15 41.5% 40.8% 43.5% 56.9% 100.0% 24.0% 61.4% 60.0% 46.4% 48.1% 39.1% NA 100.0% 70.5% 73.3% 64.7% 70.5% DNR 73.3% 64.3% 88.6% NA 92.9% 90.9% 79.2% 178 124 54 400 3 36 317 7 37 4 DNR 1 3 61 44 17 55 0 44 11 203 0 125 13 65 79 56 23 246 2 22 200 1 21 1 DNR 0 1 39 33 6 59 0 47 12 195 0 135 12 48 2011 2011 Dual 2011 Arrest 2010 2010 Arrests Arrests Percentage Incidents Arrests 158 99 11 48 2012 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Arrests Percentage Incidents Barber County SO County Total 95 Atchison PD 41 14 County Total DNR Atchison County SO 3 2 22 Colony PD Garnett PD 119 19 County Total 83 5 31 2012 Incidents Anderson County SO Moran PD Iola PD Humboldt PD Allen County SO Reporting Agency 10 8 2 49 0 0 45 0 4 0 DNR 0 0 1 1 0 13 0 11 2 27 0 19 1 7 38.8% 38.7% 38.9% 49.3% 66.7% 61.1% 48.9% 14.3% 45.9% 25.0% DNR 0.0% 33.3% 62.3% 72.7% 35.3% 83.6% NA 81.8% 90.9% 82.8% NA 92.8% 84.6% 63.1% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 14. 14 County Total 5 1 County Total 4 Cheyenne County SO 117 St Francis PD County Total 28 Baxter Springs PD DNR 29 Galena PD Weir PD 2 20 14 Columbus PD County Total 1 40 3 2 11 6 6 Cherokee County SO Cedar Vale PD Sedan PD 3 Chautauqua County SO Chase County SO 354 2 Rose Hill PD Benton PD 11 Andover PD 2 32 El Dorado PD Leon PD 3 74 162 Augusta PD 71 Butler County SO County Total 27 Horton PD 83 36 Hiawatha PD County Total 20 2012 Incidents Brown County SO Reporting Agency 2 0 2 87 DNR 29 21 16 21 12 1 1 10 6 6 282 2 2 13 21 152 47 45 71 27 35 9 2012 Arrests 1 0 1 5 DNR 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 34 0 0 3 1 20 8 2 8 4 3 1 20.0% 0.0% 25.0% 70.1% DNR 92.9% 65.5% 80.0% 52.5% 78.6% 100.0% 50.0% 81.8% 100.0% 100.0% 70.1% 100.0% 100.0% 90.9% 62.5% 81.5% 52.7% 60.6% 75.9% 85.2% 88.9% 40.0% 14 10 11 0 10 27 97 69 2 1 9 6 6 2 0 2 166 DNR 48 43 12 0 0 0 138 DNR 48 37 11 42 11 63 12 2 1 8 7 7 276 2 383 2 2 11 48 115 101 71 58 104 45 16 21 0 0 0 10 DNR 3 5 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 1 1 5 9 3 8 2 0 6 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 31 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 0.0% NA 0.0% 77.1% DNR 93.8% 74.4% 83.3% 65.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.7% 85.7% 66.8% 100.0% 0.0% 72.7% 54.2% 80.0% 59.4% 65.4% 63.8% 75.0% 90.9% 48.4% 3 1 2 165 1 34 42 17 71 8 3 0 5 2 2 376 4 DNR 13 32 125 98 104 41 DNR 18 23 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 0 0 0 115 1 33 27 12 43 7 3 0 4 2 2 282 3 DNR 11 27 119 49 73 30 DNR 16 14 2010 Arrests 0 0 0 7 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 DNR 2 4 20 8 7 2 DNR 0 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 66.1% 100.0% 88.2% 59.5% 70.6% 57.7% 87.5% 100.0% NA 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 64.1% 75.0% DNR 69.2% 71.9% 79.2% 41.8% 63.5% 68.3% DNR 88.9% 52.2% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 15. 15 3 Burden PD 3 369 5 Winfield PD County Total 89 Arkansas City PD Udall PD 49 223 Cowley County SO 5 DNR Protection PD County Total DNR 2 Coldwater PD 5 2 Commanche County SO 38 0 Waverly PD County Total 0 22 Burlington PD Lebo PD 16 Coffey County SO 92 73 Concordia PD County Total 19 Cloud County SO 40 1 Wakefield PD 3 County Total 29 Clay Center PD 12 10 County Total 12 2012 Incidents Clay County SO Clark County SO Reporting Agency 257 4 3 57 165 28 4 DNR DNR 4 36 0 0 21 15 55 43 12 27 0 18 9 10 10 2012 Arrests 19 1 0 3 14 1 0 DNR DNR 0 2 0 0 0 2 6 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 64.5% 100.0% 60.0% 60.7% 67.7% 55.1% 80.0% DNR DNR 80.0% 89.5% NA NA 95.5% 81.3% 53.3% 50.7% 63.2% 65.0% 0.0% 62.1% 80.0% 83.3% 83.3% 416 0 2 118 266 30 0 DNR DNR 0 52 0 4 24 24 82 52 30 48 3 31 323 0 3 91 207 22 0 DNR DNR 0 50 0 4 24 22 50 35 15 33 2 22 9 6 7 14 6 30 0 1 9 19 1 0 DNR DNR 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 3 0 2 1 0 0 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 7 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 70.4% NA 100.0% 69.5% 70.7% 70.0% NA DNR DNR NA 92.3% NA 100.0% 91.7% 91.7% 59.8% 67.3% 46.7% 62.5% 66.7% 64.5% 57.1% 85.7% 85.7% 438 3 2 116 261 56 4 DNR 0 4 50 0 3 21 26 58 33 25 51 0 41 10 3 3 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 363 3 2 101 214 43 5 DNR 0 5 55 0 3 25 27 41 20 21 38 0 28 10 3 3 2010 Arrests 42 0 0 17 16 9 1 DNR 0 1 10 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 0 0 73.3% 100.0% 100.0% 72.4% 75.9% 60.7% 100.0% DNR NA 100.0% 90.0% NA 100.0% 100.0% 80.8% 70.7% 60.6% 84.0% 68.6% NA 63.4% 90.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 16. 16 3 153 Pittsburg PD Frontenac PD County Total 1 5 902 University of Kansas PD Lawrence PD 27 42 County Total 10 Douglas County SO Highland PD 3 1 Troy PD 3 Wathena PD 6 9 Elwood PD 124 Doniphan County SO County Total 1 4 Chapman PD 3 20 Herington PD Enterprise PD 62 Abilene PD 6 37 County Total 6 DNR 264 0 DNR 4 Dickinson County SO Oberlin PD Decatur County SO 2 Mulberry PD 3 Arcadia PD 2 Pittsburg State University PD 0 30 17 Girard PD Cherokee PD 9 Arma PD 3 51 2012 Incidents Crawford County SO Reporting Agency 4 538 23 26 2 11 1 6 6 107 1 4 21 52 29 2 2 DNR 187 0 DNR 4 0 16 14 8 107 38 2012 Arrests 1 37 0 4 1 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 DNR 5 0 DNR 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 60.0% 55.5% 54.8% 81.5% 100.0% 90.0% 100.0% 66.7% 83.3% 82.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 82.3% 70.3% 33.3% 33.3% DNR 68.9% NA DNR 100.0% NA 88.2% 46.7% 66.7% 69.3% 72.5% DNR 249 0 0 0 1 17 13 6 183 29 8 920 35 36 4 13 5 8 6 119 DNR 3 10 78 28 0 9 771 19 27 4 12 0 5 6 100 DNR 3 13 67 17 0 0 0 1 4 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 11 DNR 0 3 5 3 0 0 DNR 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 9 1 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests DNR 331 2 1 0 1 16 23 11 225 52 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 100.0% 83.4% 51.4% 69.4% 100.0% 84.6% 0.0% 62.5% 83.3% 74.8% DNR 100.0% 100.0% 79.5% 50.0% NA NA DNR 71.0% 0.0% 0.0% NA 100.0% 87.5% 56.5% 45.5% 77.3% 53.8% 8 738 34 37 3 10 4 7 13 101 DNR 13 25 34 29 5 5 DNR 325 5 DNR 0 2 20 33 14 183 68 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 6 407 14 22 2 7 3 3 7 100 DNR 17 27 33 23 4 4 DNR 248 5 DNR 0 1 16 21 9 144 52 2010 Arrests 0 30 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 17 DNR 5 4 5 3 0 0 DNR 6 0 DNR 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 75.0% 51.1% 41.2% 56.8% 66.7% 70.0% 75.0% 42.9% 46.2% 82.2% DNR 92.3% 92.0% 82.4% 69.0% 80.0% 80.0% DNR 74.5% 100.0% DNR NA 50.0% 80.0% 63.6% 50.0% 77.0% 75.0% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 17. 17 20 9 17 7 DNR 7 8 8 167 County Total DNR 9 9 9 592 18 9 2012 Arrests 1 Fort Hays State University PD 6 Ellsworth PD 0 Holyrood PD 3 10 Garden City PD Holcomb PD 239 66 163 Finney County SO County Total 0 Kanoplis PD 16 1 Wilson PD 3 County Total 9 Ellsworth County SO 235 0 167 68 6 0 0 1 3 2 189 0 3 201 0 5 Ellis PD Victoria PD 3 County Total 5 172 Hays PD Ellis County SO Howard PD 2 Elk County SO County Total Edwards County SO 980 20 Eudora PD County Total 11 2012 Incidents Baldwin City PD Douglas County continued Reporting Agency 21 0 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 9 3 0 DNR 0 1 1 38 0 0 89.5% 0.0% 94.5% 90.9% 37.5% NA NA 100.0% 50.0% 22.2% 88.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 91.9% 70.0% 77.8% DNR 77.8% 77.8% 77.8% 56.5% 90.0% 81.8% 13 9 3 2 1 5 3 156 0 0 0 140 1 255 11 65 189 69 9 181 27 0 0 0 0 2 16 9 173 0 5 2 145 16 9 21 5 4 5 13 13 13 13 821 1,016 261 22 0 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 39 14 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 89.3% 9.1% 93.9% 89.9% 33.3% NA NA 50.0% 31.3% 33.3% 82.7% NA 0.0% 0.0% 89.0% 66.7% 55.6% 75.0% 40.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.1% 33.3% 57.1% 264 4 179 81 49 0 DNR 6 20 23 160 0 DNR 5 134 21 11 2 9 7 7 826 32 14 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 293 4 207 82 27 0 DNR 5 10 12 146 0 DNR 2 129 15 8 1 7 7 7 450 14 9 2010 Arrests 34 0 28 6 0 0 DNR 0 0 0 15 0 DNR 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 1 98.1% 100.0% 100.0% 93.8% 55.1% NA DNR 83.3% 50.0% 52.2% 81.9% NA DNR 40.0% 86.6% 61.9% 72.7% 50.0% 77.8% 100.0% 100.0% 50.7% 43.8% 57.1% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 18. 18 0 County Total Greeley County SO 3 County Total 1 1 17 0 Montezuma PD 75 17 County Total 68 7 6 Gray County SO Ulysses PD Grant County SO County Total 5 Hill City PD 1 1 County Total 1 Graham County SO Gove County SO 34 Grandview Plaza PD 539 486 Junction City PD County Total 19 222 Geary County SO County Total 9 118 Ottawa PD Wellsville PD 95 Franklin County SO 356 Spearville PD County Total 0 310 Dodge City PD Bucklin PD 46 2012 Incidents Ford County SO Reporting Agency 1 1 14 0 14 34 30 4 5 4 1 0 0 352 38 304 10 152 4 89 59 300 0 0 265 35 2012 Arrests 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 9 4 1 3 0 2 1 33 0 0 32 1 100.0% 100.0% 82.4% NA 82.4% 37.3% 35.3% 57.1% 83.3% 80.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 62.7% 85.3% 61.7% 47.4% 67.1% 44.4% 73.7% 61.1% 75.0% NA NA 75.2% 73.9% 2 2 10 0 10 69 52 17 6 6 0 4 4 549 36 1 1 9 0 9 30 22 8 6 6 0 5 5 347 38 292 17 22 491 121 5 70 46 273 0 0 254 19 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 2 0 0 0 2 2 17 6 10 1 2 0 1 1 31 0 0 30 1 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 196 15 101 80 290 0 0 269 21 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 50.0% 50.0% 90.0% NA 90.0% 34.8% 34.6% 35.3% 100.0% 100.0% NA 75.0% 75.0% 60.1% 88.9% 57.4% 72.7% 60.7% 33.3% 68.3% 56.3% 83.4% NA NA 83.3% 85.7% 1 1 13 0 13 64 58 6 7 5 2 5 5 604 56 529 19 245 14 131 100 341 0 0 314 27 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 0 0 9 0 9 41 35 6 6 4 2 3 3 434 59 364 11 147 6 81 60 321 0 0 303 18 2010 Arrests 0 0 1 0 1 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 11 17 1 4 0 2 2 36 0 0 36 0 0.0% 0.0% 61.5% NA 61.5% 54.7% 50.0% 100.0% 85.7% 80.0% 100.0% 60.0% 60.0% 67.1% 85.7% 65.6% 52.6% 58.4% 42.9% 60.3% 58.0% 83.6% NA NA 85.0% 66.7% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 19. 19 4 DNR Sedgwick PD 2 1 Mayetta PD 71 21 Holton PD County Total 49 4 4 18 18 315 DNR Jackson County SO County Total Hodgeman County SO Haskell County SO Walton PD 2 North Newton PD County Total 4 Halstead PD County Total 6 Hesston PD 3 275 Newton PD Burrton PD 23 27 DNR Harvey County SO Harper PD 2 1 14 Anthony PD Attica PD 12 County Total 0 0 Harper County SO County Total Hamilton County SO 3 24 24 Greenwood County SO County Total 2012 Incidents Reporting Agency 59 1 21 37 4 4 11 11 211 DNR 1 DNR 5 4 7 176 18 12 DNR 0 6 6 0 0 20 20 2012 Arrests 4 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 27 DNR 0 DNR 2 1 2 20 2 0 DNR 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 77.5% 100.0% 95.2% 69.4% 100.0% 100.0% 55.6% 55.6% 58.4% DNR 33.3% DNR 75.0% 75.0% 83.3% 56.7% 69.6% 44.4% DNR 0.0% 42.9% 50.0% NA NA 66.7% 66.7% 10 DNR 0 7 3 DNR DNR 15 15 DNR 30 30 3 3 DNR DNR 225 DNR 1 1 8 2 60 DNR 35 46 4 4 DNR DNR 336 DNR 2 2 6 4 16 186 288 14 11 20 81 7 DNR 2 5 0 0 DNR DNR 21 DNR 0 0 3 0 2 14 2 1 DNR 0 1 0 DNR DNR 3 3 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 11 DNR 0 8 3 DNR DNR 15 15 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 65.4% DNR 80.0% 54.3% 75.0% 75.0% DNR DNR 60.7% DNR 50.0% 50.0% 83.3% 50.0% 100.0% 59.7% 45.0% 81.8% DNR NA 75.0% 100.0% DNR DNR 80.0% 80.0% 85 0 36 49 14 14 DNR DNR 266 DNR 2 DNR 4 3 9 231 17 16 DNR 5 4 7 DNR DNR 16 16 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 60 0 31 29 6 6 DNR DNR 192 DNR 0 DNR 4 4 8 164 12 13 DNR 4 3 6 DNR DNR 14 14 2010 Arrests 7 0 1 6 0 0 DNR DNR 22 DNR 0 DNR 0 1 1 19 1 1 DNR 0 0 1 DNR DNR 1 1 62.4% NA 83.3% 46.9% 42.9% 42.9% DNR DNR 63.9% DNR 0.0% DNR 100.0% 100.0% 77.8% 62.8% 64.7% 75.0% DNR 80.0% 75.0% 71.4% DNR DNR 81.3% 81.3% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 20. 20 County Total 5 49 43 Prairie Village PD 5 Lake Quivera PD 3 County Total Johnson County Parks PD 2,899 0 0 3 45 Spring Hill PD 161 0 Mission Hills PD Gardner PD Westwood PD Lenexa PD 3 298 200 Shawnee PD Roeland Park PD 958 859 37 Overland Park PD 5 Olathe PD 5 Mission PD 113 Merriam PD 5 3 54 Leawood PD 76 DNR DNR 84 Fairway PD Johnson County SO Jewell County SO 2 Perry PD 3 County Total 0 Winchester PD 0 0 Oskaloosa PD 3 4 1,707 0 0 21 3 78 0 120 140 27 51 639 456 19 67 29 0 57 DNR DNR 45 0 0 0 0 8 0 McLouth PD Nortonville PD 3 DNR 41 2012 Arrests 0 DNR 76 2012 Incidents 0 Meriden PD Valley Falls PD 2 Jefferson County SO Reporting Agency 32 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 2 0 3 18 0 0 0 1 0 3 DNR DNR 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 DNR 4 57.8% NA NA 44.4% 100.0% 47.8% NA 58.5% 46.3% 62.8% 98.0% 64.8% 53.1% 51.4% 59.3% 51.9% 0.0% 71.1% DNR DNR 48.8% NA NA NA NA 50.0% NA DNR 48.7% 2,803 0 1 41 4 138 0 177 294 23 53 848 930 64 88 65 1,708 0 1 33 1 61 0 109 135 16 53 617 492 35 66 39 3 47 71 6 DNR DNR 58 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 52 85 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 4 1 2 25 40 3 1 2 0 1 DNR DNR 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests DNR DNR 108 0 0 1 0 10 1 3 93 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 57.9% NA 100.0% 70.7% 25.0% 43.5% NA 61.0% 44.6% 65.2% 96.2% 69.8% 48.6% 50.0% 73.9% 56.9% 50.0% 64.8% DNR DNR 48.1% NA NA 100.0% NA 40.0% 100.0% 0.0% 49.5% 2,124 0 0 44 4 174 2 186 364 41 58 972 DNR 59 91 59 1 69 DNR DNR 121 6 0 0 0 7 0 11 97 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 1,279 0 0 29 3 65 0 125 151 15 53 678 DNR 25 49 32 0 54 DNR DNR 71 4 0 0 0 4 0 9 54 2010 Arrests 71 0 0 4 0 1 0 7 3 0 5 40 DNR 5 0 1 0 5 DNR DNR 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 56.9% NA NA 56.8% 75.0% 36.8% 0.0% 63.4% 40.7% 36.6% 82.8% 65.6% DNR 33.9% 53.8% 52.5% 0.0% 71.0% DNR DNR 52.9% 66.7% NA NA NA 57.1% NA 81.8% 48.5% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 21. 21 38 11 Lansing PD Basehor PD Lincoln County SO 37 Tonganoxie PD County Total 8 8 808 612 Leavenworth PD County Total 110 8 8 Leavenworth County SO County Total 3 Altamont PD Lane County SO 11 Chetopa PD 263 9 Oswego PD County Total 15 225 6 6 39 Parsons PD County Total County Total DNR Labette County SO Kiowa County SO Norwich PD 25 2 14 13 Kingman PD County Total 13 2012 Incidents Kingman County SO Kearny County SO Reporting Agency 5 5 348 7 22 23 234 62 5 5 161 4 15 7 120 15 2 2 31 DNR 23 8 9 9 2012 Arrests 0 0 22 1 1 3 16 1 0 0 24 1 4 1 16 2 0 0 0 DNR 0 0 1 1 62.5% 62.5% 40.3% 54.5% 55.3% 54.1% 35.6% 55.5% 62.5% 62.5% 52.1% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 46.2% 86.7% 33.3% 33.3% 79.5% DNR 92.0% 57.1% 61.5% 61.5% 2 15 7 9 9 785 13 58 35 549 130 10 1 1 392 4 37 17 266 68 6 6 313 10 164 1 17 8 19 121 30 4 4 26 0 21 5 2 2 0 0 35 0 3 1 30 1 1 1 28 1 2 0 22 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 257 4 4 32 0 28 4 5 5 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 11.1% 11.1% 45.5% 30.8% 58.6% 45.7% 43.0% 51.5% 50.0% 50.0% 43.5% 100.0% 76.5% 87.5% 38.5% 53.3% 100.0% 100.0% 78.1% NA 75.0% 100.0% 40.0% 40.0% 10 10 875 16 99 35 508 217 6 6 380 2 17 8 329 24 5 5 20 1 11 8 DNR DNR 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 5 5 394 12 45 10 210 117 2 2 114 2 16 9 74 13 3 3 12 0 6 6 DNR DNR 2010 Arrests 0 0 30 1 2 0 19 8 0 0 11 0 1 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DNR DNR 50.0% 50.0% 41.6% 69.8% 43.4% 28.6% 37.6% 50.2% 33.3% 33.3% 27.1% 100.0% 88.2% 87.5% 20.1% 54.2% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 0.0% 54.5% 75.0% DNR DNR 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 22. 22 County Total DNR 38 DNR 22 2012 Arrests 3 2 2012 Incidents 6 0 Inman PD Canton PD County Total 0 37 0 Goessel PD 3 Burns PD Florence PD 4 Peabody PD 3 4 14 Marion PD 12 Hillsboro PD Marion County SO 6 Moundridge PD 144 5 Lindsborg PD County Total 113 McPherson PD 163 DNR 14 County Total McPherson County SO Americus PD 2 1 137 Emporia PD Emporia State University PD 25 Lyon County SO 6 5 Oakley PD 3 County Total 1 Logan County SO 60 5 4 La Cygne PD Linn Valley PD 27 0 0 3 4 10 1 9 92 0 2 5 5 72 8 114 DNR 1 98 15 7 6 1 32 4 3 3 Pleasanton PD 3 Mound City PD Linn County SO Reporting Agency 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 10 0 0 1 0 9 0 4 DNR 0 4 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 1 DNR 4 67.6% NA NA 100.0% 100.0% 64.3% 25.0% 66.7% 56.9% NA 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% 55.8% 57.1% 67.5% DNR 100.0% 68.6% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 54.0% 100.0 60.0% 66.7% DNR 47.4% DNR 1 48 0 1 4 8 12 7 16 152 2 5 6 4 121 29 0 0 3 7 4 5 10 89 0 0 3 4 73 9 196 14 132 DNR 1 123 8 24 171 10 8 2 18 0 1 DNR 1 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 10 1 13 DNR 0 13 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 DNR 0 0 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 9 6 3 29 0 1 DNR 2 26 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 56.3% NA 0.0% 75.0% 87.5% 33.3% 71.4% 50.0% 51.3% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 52.1% 57.1% 60.7% DNR 100.0% 64.3% 33.3% 88.9% 100.0% 66.7% 62.1% NA 100.0% DNR 50.0% 61.5% 53 0 DNR 2 2 23 2 24 135 3 2 7 10 102 11 149 0 3 129 17 19 16 3 34 5 12 5 1 11 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 26 0 DNR 2 2 16 0 6 101 0 2 3 12 72 12 100 0 0 94 6 7 4 3 16 3 8 4 1 0 2010 Arrests 2 0 DNR 0 0 2 0 0 11 0 0 0 2 8 1 5 0 0 5 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 45.3% NA DNR 100.0% 100.0% 60.9% 0.0% 25.0% 66.7% 0.0% 100.0% 42.9% 100.0% 62.7% 100.0% 63.8% NA 0.0% 69.0% 36.3% 26.3% 18.8% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 58.3% 80.0% 100.0% 0.0% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 23. 23 County Total 21 47 Paola PD 6 2 3 13 Council Grove PD County Total 4 10 3 Morris County SO 5 3 193 County Total 4 64 98 25 36 DNR 31 5 77 3 15 33 26 6 1 5 25 1 DNR 1 15 8 2012 Arrests 307 Caney PD Cherryvale PD 110 Independence PD 3 27 35 161 County Total 30 DNR Coffeyville PD 2 5 Montgomery County SO Cawker City PD Beloit PD Mitchell County SO Louisburg PD 132 6 Osawatomie PD 58 11 Miami County SO County Total 7 4 Meade County SO Meade PD 31 1 County Total DNR Frankfort PD Waterville PD 1 2 Blue Rapids PD 17 Marysville PD 3 12 2012 Incidents Marshall County SO Reporting Agency 0 0 0 29 1 0 10 16 2 6 DNR 6 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 DNR 0 1 0 46.2% 66.7% 40.0% 53.4% 40.0% 75.0% 49.1% 50.9% 85.2% 85.7% DNR 83.3% 100.0% 56.1% 50.0% 66.7% 66.0% 44.8% 54.5% 25.0% 71.4% 77.4% 100.0% DNR 100.0% 82.4% 66.7% 16 21 28 10 10 0 11 DNR DNR DNR 11 0 3 28 16 12 16 11 5 1 272 2 3 75 159 34 43 0 21 22 376 3 129 198 44 36 0 19 17 68 8 137 0 0 0 53 0 1 14 35 3 8 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DNR DNR DNR 1 0 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 29 41 59 12 12 0 19 DNR DNR DNR 13 6 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 57.1% 68.8% 41.7% 58.2% 50.0% 66.7% 47.3% 62.6% 70.5% 97.2% NA 100.0% 94.1% 49.6% 37.5% 55.2% 51.2% 47.5% 83.3% 83.3% NA 52.6% DNR DNR DNR 76.9% 0.0% 24 12 12 280 0 5 66 156 53 33 DNR 27 6 168 10 54 39 65 168 5 13 33 DNR DNR 2 28 3 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 20 9 11 186 0 4 43 104 35 26 DNR 24 2 85 3 23 19 40 85 1 10 20 DNR DNR 0 20 0 2010 Arrests 3 1 2 19 0 0 4 14 1 3 DNR 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 DNR DNR 0 0 0 70.8% 66.7% 60.0% 59.6% NA 80.0% 59.1% 57.7% 64.2% 69.7% DNR 77.8% 33.3% 50.0% 30.0% 42.6% 46.2% 61.5% 50.0% 20.0% 69.2% 60.6% DNR DNR 0.0% 71.4% 0.0% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 24. 24 Scranton PD 3 Overbrook PD Lyndon PD 3 3 Carbondale PD 79 7 1 4 DNR 5 2 31 Burlingame PD 25 21 4 11 11 Osage City PD County Total 0 99 31 County Total County Total County Total Osage County SO Norton PD Norton County SO Ness County SO Erie PD 75 Chanute PD 3 24 33 Neosho County SO County Total 5 3 Seneca PD 14 Sabetha PD 11 2 9 14 County Total 3 2012 Incidents Nemaha County SO Elkhart PD Morton County SO Reporting Agency 41 2 0 2 DNR 3 11 23 14 9 5 9 9 58 0 36 22 21 4 9 8 13 4 9 2012 Arrests 1 0 0 0 DNR 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 5 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 50.6% 28.6% 0.0% 50.0% DNR 60.0% 32.3% 74.2% 52.0% 42.9% 100.0% 63.6% 63.6% 53.5% NA 46.7% 75.0% 63.6% 80.0% 64.3% 57.1% 90.9% 100.0% 88.9% 87 4 2 0 8 0 50 24 36 29 7 4 4 65 0 51 14 32 2 15 15 7 4 3 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 66 2 2 0 5 0 37 20 29 25 4 2 2 42 0 36 6 26 2 13 11 8 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 72.7% 50.0% 100.0% NA 62.5% NA 70.0% 83.3% 77.8% 82.8% 57.1% 50.0% 50.0% 63.1% NA 70.6% 35.7% 75.0% 100.0% 80.0% 66.7% 85.7% 100.0% 66.7% 124 2 0 2 8 6 77 29 22 20 2 7 7 93 1 65 27 38 4 18 16 19 9 10 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 63 2 0 2 5 4 25 25 14 12 2 4 4 69 1 54 14 27 2 13 12 14 8 6 2010 Arrests 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48.4% 100.0% NA 100.0% 62.5% 66.7% 32.5% 75.9% 59.1% 55.0% 100.0% 57.1% 57.1% 71.0% 100.0% 78.5% 51.9% 71.1% 50.0% 72.2% 75.0% 73.7% 88.9% 60.0% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 25. 25 County Total CB 65 Pratt PD 6 3 Atwood PD County Total 3 Rawlins County SO 78 13 Pratt County SO County Total 0 Havensville PD 113 2 Onaga PD County Total DNR St George PD Wamego PD 7 2 104 11 11 57 St Mary’s PD Pottawatomie County SO Phillips County SO County Total 47 Larned PD 8 10 County Total 5 DNR 3 Pawnee County SO Minneapolis PD Delphos PD 2 Ottawa County SO 3 9 1 Osborne PD County Total 8 2012 Incidents Osborne County SO Reporting Agency 4 3 1 61 54 7 49 0 3 CB DNR 3 43 11 11 39 34 5 7 7 DNR 0 6 1 5 2012 Arrests 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 CB DNR 0 1 1 1 4 4 0 2 2 DNR 0 0 0 0 66.7% 100.0% 33.3% 76.9% 81.5% 53.8% 41.6% NA 100.0% CB DNR 42.9% 40.4% 90.9% 90.9% 61.4% 63.8% 50.0% 62.5% 100.0% DNR 0.0% 66.7% 100.0% 62.5% 10 10 0 79 66 13 132 0 1 0 3 19 109 10 10 56 51 5 10 5 0 5 3 3 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 10 10 0 48 42 6 69 0 0 0 3 11 55 10 10 35 31 4 2 2 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 6 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 80.0% 80.0% NA 53.2% 54.5% 46.2% 50.8% NA 0.0% NA 100.0% 52.6% 49.5% 80.0% 80.0% 60.7% 58.8% 80.0% 20.0% 40.0% NA 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 8 7 1 94 69 3 3 0 48 35 13 74 131 25 0 2 0 10 5 57 18 18 53 48 5 2 2 0 0 6 6 2010 Arrests 0 5 0 9 9 108 15 15 68 58 10 12 5 0 7 8 8 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 3 3 3 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 37.5% 42.9% 0.0% 50.0% 49.3% 52.0% 53.4% NA 40.0% NA 100.0% 55.6% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 67.6% 70.7% 50.0% 16.7% 40.0% NA 0.0% 62.5% 62.5% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 26. 26 County Total 1 Lacrosse PD 3 9 8 Rush County SO County Total 5 Stockton PD 3 14 4 Plainville PD County Total 5 557 8 549 15 0 2 Rooks County SO County Total Kansas State University PD Riley County PD Chase PD Little River PD 0 Geneseo PD 3 3 0 Bushton PD DNR 10 16 Sterling PD Lyons PD County Total 2 14 2 Rice County SO Belleville PD Republic County SO 9 Buhler PD 881 1 County Total 4 38 South Hutchinson PD Nickerson PD 6 778 Hutchinson PD Haven PD 51 2012 Incidents Reno County SO Reporting Agency 7 1 6 14 5 5 4 228 5 223 13 0 2 0 0 0 DNR 11 17 2 15 496 7 1 1 26 417 44 2012 Arrests 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 DNR 1 2 0 2 41 0 0 0 1 35 5 77.8% 100.0% 75.0% 92.9% 100.0% 100.0% 80.0% 40.9% 62.5% 40.6% 80.0% NA 100.0% NA NA 0.0% DNR 100.0% 93.8% 100.0% 92.9% 51.6% 77.8% 100.0% 25.0% 65.8% 49.1% 76.5% 7 2 5 7 1 DNR 6 492 5 487 67 0 4 0 0 9 38 16 16 7 9 900 3 1 3 19 824 50 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 3 1 2 7 1 DNR 6 187 4 183 45 0 7 0 0 3 28 7 14 6 8 452 3 1 4 20 386 38 0 0 0 1 0 DNR 1 0 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 5 1 2 1 1 44 0 0 1 5 38 0 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 42.9% 50.0% 40.0% 85.7% 100.0% DNR 83.3% 38.0% 80.0% 37.6% 53.7% NA 100.0% NA NA 33.3% 60.5% 37.5% 75.0% 71.4% 77.8% 45.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 78.9% 42.2% 76.0% 18 9 9 11 2 2 7 436 5 431 17 0 2 0 0 2 DNR 13 11 7 4 1055 DNR 3 5 28 943 76 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 11 3 8 8 1 2 5 210 2 208 13 0 2 0 0 1 DNR 10 10 6 4 478 DNR 0 6 20 392 60 2010 Arrests 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DNR0 0 0 0 0 51 DNR 0 1 1 45 4 61.1% 33.3% 88.9% 63.6% 50.0% 100.0% 57.1% 48.2% 40.0% 48.3% 76.5% NA 100.0% NA NA 50.0% DNR 76.9% 90.9% 85.7% 100.0% 40.5% DNR 0.0% 100.0% 67.9% 36.8% 73.7% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 27. 27 24 Wichita PD 0 2 5 Eastborough PD Cheney PD 0 2 Andale PD 3 Maize USD 266 0 6 Bel Aire PD Kechi PD 9 52 0 2 0 2 51 21 Maize PD Park City PD Mount Hope PD 0 0 10 11 2 0 0 0 20 3,176 105 79 50 21 16 5 548 0 545 3 35 31 4 2012 Arrests 0 1 10 Goddard PD Garden Plain PD 11 Clearwater PD 3 4 Wichita State University PD Colwich PD 26 6,418 Haysville PD Valley Center PD 97 109 Derby PD 106 County Total 19 5 Sedgwick County SO Scott City PD Scott County SO 0 Assaria PD 768 742 Salina PD County Total 26 Saline County SO 61 45 Russell PD County Total 16 2012 Incidents Russell County SO Reporting Agency 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 219 22 5 2 2 1 1 35 0 35 0 3 3 0 NA 100.0% NA 33.3% 86.5% 42.9% NA 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 40.0% 0.0% NA 0.0% 73.1% 46.1% 76.1% 76.3% 45.3% 79.2% 78.9% 80.0% 66.8% NA 68.7% 11.5% 52.5% 62.2% 25.0% 0 7 1 22 31 21 DNR 5 14 10 3 1 1 0 36 6,397 142 119 229 19 17 2 691 0 655 36 73 59 14 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 0 8 1 17 28 9 DNR 2 8 12 1 0 2 0 29 3,375 106 102 114 19 19 0 527 0 506 21 71 55 16 0 1 0 3 1 0 DNR 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 243 10 3 16 4 4 0 31 0 30 1 14 12 2 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests NA 100.0% 100.0% 63.6% 87.1% 42.9% DNR 40.0% 57.1% 100.0% 33.3% 0.0% 100.0% NA 80.6% 49.0% 67.6% 83.2% 42.8% 78.9% 88.2% 0.0% 71.8% NA 72.7% 55.6% 78.1% 72.9% 100.0% 0 2 1 13 32 29 1 2 10 6 8 3 1 3 35 6,507 153 161 258 22 22 0 0 562 39 69 48 21 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 0 1 1 8 13 15 1 0 3 6 4 3 0 0 24 3,551 20 136 126 15 15 0 0 504 29 41 43 8 2010 Arrests 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 277 1 2 13 2 2 0 0 34 1 7 6 1 NA 50.0% 100.0% 61.5% 31.3% 44.8% 100.0% 0.0% 20.0% 83.3% 37.5% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 62.9% 50.3% 12.4% 83.2% 43.8% 59.1% 59.1% NA NA 83.6% 71.8% 63.8% 77.1% 33.3% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 28. 28 County Total DNR DNR Smith Center PD DNR 29 2 County Total 24 5 6 Smith County SO 2 Goodland PD 3 Sherman County SO County Total 3 3 Hoxie PD 3 Sheridan County SO 3 2,056 2 Washburn University PD County Total 0 1 Topeka Fire Arson Inv MTAA PD 3 Silver Lake PD DNR 2 2 1,849 Topeka PD Rossville PD 202 5 Shawnee County SO 0 168 Kismet PD County Total 157 Liberal PD 6,871 11 County Total 1 0 2012 Incidents Seward County SO Bentley PD 3 Goddard USD 265 Sedgwick County continued Reporting Agency DNR DNR DNR 22 17 5 5 3 2 783 0 0 0 DNR 1 674 108 157 0 147 10 3,517 0 0 2012 Arrests DNR DNR DNR 1 1 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 DNR 0 24 2 13 0 12 1 255 0 0 DNR DNR DNR 72.4% 66.7% 100.0% 83.3% 100.0% 66.7% 36.8% 0.0% 0.0% NA DNR 50.0% 35.2% 52.5% 85.7% NA 86.0% 81.8% 47.5% 0.0% NA 0 1 0 DNR 1 537 117 177 0 163 14 3,814 0 0 DNR DNR DNR 14 12 2 3 2 1 DNR DNR DNR 7 6 1 3 2 1 656 1,833 DNR DNR DNR 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 DNR 0 21 0 20 0 18 2 280 0 0 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 3 1 2 DNR 3 1,610 214 193 0 173 20 7,039 0 0 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents DNR DNR DNR 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 34.6% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% DNR 33.3% 32.0% 54.7% 81.3% NA 83.8% 60.0% 50.2% NA NA 3 2 1 24 15 9 2 2 0 1,770 3 2 0 DNR 4 1,578 183 212 0 184 28 7,226 1 0 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 1 1 0 22 14 8 3 3 0 730 1 0 0 DNR 5 625 99 209 0 181 28 3,913 1 0 2010 Arrests 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 34 0 0 0 DNR 2 32 0 25 0 21 4 303 0 0 33.3% 50.0% 0.0% 87.5% 93.3% 77.8% 100.0% 100.0% NA 39.3% 33.3% 0.0% NA DNR 75.0% 37.6% 54.1% 86.8% NA 87.0% 85.7% 50.0% 100.0% NA 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 29. 29 County Total Wakeeney PD Trego County SO Colby PD County Total County Total Thomas County SO Argonia PD 2 Conway Springs PD Oxford PD 16 10 6 53 47 6 180 DNR 9 DNR 2 24 Mulvane PD Caldwell PD 11 3 107 Belle Plaine PD 11 11 DNR Wellington PD 2 2 2 27 County Total 0 10 Sumner County SO Hugoton PD Stevens County SO 2 County Total Stanton County SO 3 County Total 2 St John PD Macksville PD 4 Stafford PD 3 4 2012 Incidents Stafford County SO Reporting Agency 10 7 3 51 50 1 107 DNR 7 DNR 2 18 8 58 14 10 10 DNR 2 2 7 0 1 2 4 2012 Arrests 0 0 0 7 7 0 6 DNR 0 DNR 0 1 0 4 1 1 1 DNR 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 62.5% 70.0% 50.0% 83.0% 91.5% 16.7% 56.1% DNR 77.8% DNR 100.0% 70.8% 72.7% 50.5% 48.1% 81.8% 81.8% DNR 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% NA 50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 7 6 6 9 1 65 51 14 113 2 0 0 4 25 DNR 63 19 0 0 DNR 2 2 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 7 6 1 14 0 0 0 0 2 DNR 9 3 0 0 DNR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 3 70 55 15 195 2 0 1 6 37 DNR 117 32 5 5 DNR 5 5 10 0 4 2 4 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 77.8% 100.0% 33.3% 82.9% 81.8% 86.7% 50.8% 100.0% NA 0.0% 66.7% 62.2% DNR 46.2% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% DNR 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% NA 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 2 0 DNR 1 29 1 56 22 0 0 DNR 2 2 14 0 6 5 3 2010 Arrests 5 3 2 73 62 5 4 1 73 61 12 212 11 111 3 7 DNR 6 36 2 123 35 4 4 DNR 3 3 24 2 9 7 6 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 1 1 0 11 9 2 14 0 0 DNR 0 3 0 8 3 0 0 DNR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 80.0% 100.0% 50.0% 84.9% 83.9% 90.9% 45.8% 66.7% 0.0% DNR 16.7% 72.2% 50.0% 39.0% 54.3% 0.0% 0.0% DNR 66.7% 66.7% 54.2% 0.0% 66.7% 57.1% 50.0% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 30. 30 34 13 KU Med Center PD County Total KCK Community College PD 1,451 3 1,339 Kansas City PD Edwardsville PD 48 Bonner Springs PD 5 14 Wyandotte County SO 22 12 Yates Center PD County Total 10 Woodson County SO 38 30 Fredonia PD Neodesha PD 7 3 1 County Total County Total 3 7 7 0 0 3 Wilson County SO Wichita County SO County Total Washington County SO County Total Wallace County SO 3 0 11 Maple Hill PD County Total 0 DNR Eskridge PD Alma PD 11 Wabaunsee County SO 2 2012 Incidents Reporting Agency 841 1 11 38 751 32 8 12 9 3 22 15 1 6 3 3 6 6 0 0 9 0 0 DNR 9 2012 Arrests 51 0 0 10 38 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 DNR 0 54.4% 33.3% 84.6% 82.4% 53.2% 60.4% 57.1% 54.5% 75.0% 30.0% 55.3% 46.7% 100.0% 85.7% 100.0% 100.0% 71.4% 71.4% NA NA 81.8% NA NA DNR 81.8% 1,095 579 0 5 7 0 30 508 30 6 16 8 46 969 56 17 24 12 8 69 85 12 30 29 10 5 5 10 10 0 0 17 0 0 DNR 17 37 0 1 4 29 3 0 1 1 0 14 6 5 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 0 0 DNR 3 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 40 35 10 5 5 12 12 1 1 23 0 0 DNR 23 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents 49.5% NA 57.1% 56.5% 49.4% 48.2% 35.3% 62.5% 58.3% 66.7% 64.7% 60.0% 68.6% 70.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 60.9% NA NA DNR 60.9% 1,130 1 12 42 1,004 67 4 30 13 17 63 33 16 14 7 7 16 16 1 1 36 0 1 DNR 35 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 640 0 4 49 530 54 3 18 9 9 44 26 10 8 4 4 17 17 1 1 19 0 0 DNR 19 2010 Arrests 64 0 0 9 48 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 4 0 0 3 0 0 DNR 3 51.0% 0.0% 33.3% 95.2% 48.0% 70.0% 75.0% 60.0% 69.2% 52.9% 69.8% 78.8% 62.5% 57.1% 57.1% 57.1% 81.3% 81.3% 100.0% 100.0% 44.4% NA 0.0% DNR 45.7% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 31. 31 0 2012 Incidents 44 14,102 42 24,373 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 909 7 0 0 0 DNR 0 6 1 0 54.1% 88.1% 87.5% NA NA DNR NA 85.2% 100.0% NA 24,159 47 11 0 0 DNR 0 30 6 0 2012 Dual 2012 Arrest 2011 Arrests Percentage Incidents Data collected is based on information entered into KIBRS by June 30, 2013 Agency did not report any data or submit zero reports for the current year Agency submitted incomplete data for the current year Tribal Police are only required to submit reports for crimes involving non-tribe members Agency reported summary data for 2012 Agency went to covered by status midyear State Totals Potawatomi Tribal PD 7 0 0 DNR Total State/Tribal 0 0 DNR 0 29 8 4 24 0 8 0 2012 Arrests 4 Kickapoo Tribal PD Iowa Tribal PD 4 Sac & Fox Tribal PD State Fire Marshal 27 Kansas Wildlife and Parks Kansas Highway Patrol 7 Kansas Bureau of Investigation State Agencies/Tribal Reporting Agency 14,550 45 12 0 0 DNR 0 29 4 0 1,072 4 2 0 0 DNR 0 2 0 0 2011 2011 Dual Arrests Arrests 55.8% 87..2% 90.9% NA NA DNR NA 90.0% 66.7% NA 23,828 59 18 0 DNR DNR 0 35 3 3 2011 Arrest 2010 Percentage Incidents 14,193 53 12 0 DNR DNR 0 35 3 3 2010 Arrests 1,174 9 3 0 DNR DNR 0 5 1 0 54.6% 74.6% 50.0% NA DNR DNR NA 85.7% 66.7% 100.0% 2010 Dual 2010 Arrest Arrests Percentage Reported DV Incidents By Agency 2010-2012
  • 32. Domestic Violence Victim/Offender Characteristics Victim (Agencies that filled out summary sheets are not included. Incidents may include more than one victim or suspect) Age Female Male Unknown Total White Black Indian Asian Unknown Total Percent of Total 169 191 0 360 301 50 1 1 7 360 1.5% 10-14 66 88 0 154 124 29 0 0 1 154 0.7% 15-19 1,154 410 0 1,564 1,273 274 5 10 2 1,564 6.7% 20-24 3,515 1,266 0 4,781 3,763 901 65 44 8 4,781 20.5% 25-29 2,980 1,183 1 4,164 3,375 689 50 39 11 4,164 17.8% 30-34 2,339 958 1 3,298 2,759 475 27 25 12 3,298 14.1% 35-39 1,672 705 0 2,377 2,023 301 22 26 5 2,377 10.2% 40-44 1,393 639 0 2,032 1,714 281 12 20 5 2,032 8.7% 45-49 1,137 569 0 1,706 1,441 228 20 12 5 1,706 7.3% 50-54 763 509 0 1,272 1,043 207 12 6 4 1,272 5.5% 55-59 398 308 0 706 588 109 4 4 1 706 3.0% 60-64 214 169 0 383 320 59 1 1 2 383 1.6% 65-69 98 85 0 183 167 132 0 1 2 183 0.8% 70-74 72 38 0 110 100 8 0 2 0 110 0.5% 75 Plus 72 57 0 129 117 9 0 2 1 129 0.6% Unknown 28 73 13 114 74 7 1 0 32 114 0.5% 16,070 7,248 15 23,333 19,182 3,640 220 193 98 23,333 Under 10 Total 100.0% Suspect (Agencies that filled out summary sheets are not included. Incidents may include more than one victim or suspect) Age Female Male Unknown Total White Black Indian Asian Unknown Total Percent of Total Under 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 10-14 7 14 0 21 18 3 0 0 0 21 0.1% 15-19 521 695 0 1,216 940 262 7 6 1 1,216 5.6% 20-24 1,466 2,972 0 4,438 3,252 1,081 67 33 5 4,438 20.5% 25-29 1,081 3,156 0 4,237 3,194 946 56 35 6 4,237 19.6% 30-34 859 2,478 0 3,337 2,631 645 24 28 9 3,337 15.4% 35-39 661 1,754 0 2,415 1,943 422 26 18 6 2,415 11.2% 40-44 529 1,477 0 2,006 1,579 382 19 19 7 2,006 9.3% 45-49 436 1,237 0 1,673 1,297 342 18 14 2 1,673 7.7% 50-54 318 908 0 1,226 924 273 19 8 2 1,226 5.7% 55-59 117 400 0 517 427 88 0 2 0 517 2.4% 60-64 54 178 0 232 183 46 0 2 1 232 1.1% 65-69 26 76 0 102 91 10 1 0 0 102 0.5% 70-74 20 47 0 67 59 7 0 1 0 67 0.3% 75 Plus 13 30 0 43 40 3 0 0 0 43 0.2% Unknown 32 72 4 108 50 40 0 1 17 108 0.5% 6,140 15,494 4 21,638 16,628 4,550 237 167 56 21,638 Total 32 100.0%
  • 33. Domestic Violence Relationship of Victim to Offender Relationship 1 Spouse Common Law Spouse 2012 Percent of Total 2011 Percent of Total 2010 5,471 16.57% 5,392 15.90% 5,483 16.24% Groups Percent of Total 642 1.94% 685 2.02% 616 1,665 5.04% 1,761 5.19% 1,638 1,041 3.15% 1,300 3.83% 1,380 4.09% Sibling 878 2.66% 1,181 3.48% 1,384 4.10% Grandparent 117 0.35% 97 0.29% 80 0.24% Grandchild 42 0.13% 46 0.14% 65 0.19% In-Law 253 0.77% 266 0.78% 305 0.90% Step-parent 131 0.40% 206 0.61% 342 1.01% Step-child 183 0.55% 256 0.75% 277 0.82% Step-sibling 27 0.08% 40 0.12% 48 0.14% Foster Parent 8 0.02% 15 0.04% 22 0.07% Foster Child 5 0.02% 2 0.01% 4 0.01% Foster Sibling 6 0.02% 7 0.02% 9 0.03% Other Family Member 432 1.31% 547 1.61% 605 1.79% Acquaintance 891 2.70% 922 2.72% 902 2.67% Friend 173 0.52% 250 0.74% 151 0.45% Roommates 809 2.45% 774 2.28% 659 1.95% Neighbor 42 0.13% 35 0.10% 38 0.11% Babysittee 3 0.01% 5 0.01% 10 0.03% 38.05% 12,460 Family Member 17% 4.85% Child Stranger 2% 1.82% Parent Other Known 9% 36.90% Boyfriend/Girlfriend 2 13,445 40.72% 12,908 Significant Other 72% Significant Other 21,124 71.80% Family Member 5,055 17.18% Otherwise Known 2,588 8.80% 655 2.23% Stranger Intimate Relationship Homosexual 2% Spouse/Ex 35% Dating/Ex 63% Spouse/Ex 7,323 34.67% Dating/Ex 13,445 63.65% 356 1.69% Homosexual Immediate Family Sibling 23% Child of Boyfriend/ Girlfriend 147 0.45% 155 0.46% 141 0.42% BF/GF of Suspect’s Parent 120 0.36% 45 0.13% 36 0.11% Homosexual Relationship 356 1.08% 342 1.01% 317 0.94% 1,210 3.66% 1,178 3.47% 1,259 3.73% 5 0.02% 5 0.01% 2 0.01% Parent 1,804 45.74% 665 2.01% 730 2.15% 728 2.16% Child 1,229 31.16% 3,596 10.89% 4,120 12.15% 4,162 12.33% 911 23.10% Ex-Spouse Employer/Employee Otherwise Known Victim was Suspect Relationship Unknown 311 0.94% 428 1.26% 344 Stranger 344 1.04% 223 0.66% 298 TOTAL 33,018 33,765 33,921 33 Parent 46% Child 31% Sibling 1.02% 1)Relationships are counted for each victim to each offender and may exceed the incidents 0.88% reported. 2) Includes ex-boyfriend/girlfriend 3) A 2012 change in definition,; siblings alone are no longer classified as domestic violence.
  • 34. Domestic Violence Location of Offense Location Parking Lot/Garage 2012 Percent of Total 2011 Percent of Total 2010 Percent of Total 455 1.8% 470 1.9% 368 1.5% Street 1,380 5.6% 1,179 4.9% 1193 5.0% Alley 51 0.2% 42 0.2% 49 0.2% 101 0.4% 102 0.4% 114 0.5% 77 0.3% 76 0.3% 86 Residence 0.4% Highway Rural Road Multiple 29% Single 71% 3 0.0% 8 0.0% 4 0.0% 10 0.0% 5 0.0% 7 0.0% 14,718 59.8% 14,794 61.2% 14,854 62.3% 6,049 24.6% 5,917 24.5% 5,555 23.3% Nursing Care Facility 29 0.1% 35 0.1% 29 0.1% Dormitory/Sorority/Fraternity 16 0.1% 19 0.1% 20 0.1% College/University/Propriety School 26 0.1% 14 0.1% 22 0.1% All Other Schools 49 0.2% 50 0.2% 59 0.2% Church/Synagogue/Temple 19 0.1% 23 0.1% 15 0.1% Government/Tax-Payer Funded Bldg 87 0.4% 98 0.4% 89 0.4% Jail/Prison 41 0.2% 32 0.1% 28 0.1% Hospital 61 0.2% 51 0.2% 67 0.3% Hotel/Motel 371 54.8% 5 0.0% 10 0.0% 18 0.1% Tavern/Bar/Liquor 167 24.7% 11 0.0% 19 0.1% 18 0.1% Restaurant 139 20.5% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 10 0.0% 115 0.5% 108 0.4% 105 0.4% Service/Gas Station 46 0.2% 29 0.1% 38 0.2% Convenience Store 90 0.4% 52 0.2% 92 0.4% Department/Discount Store 85 0.3% 78 0.3% 63 0.3% Grocery/Supermarket 36 0.1% 32 0.1% 50 0.2% Specialty Store 77 0.3% 52 0.2% 77 0.3% Mall Commons 10 0.0% 9 0.0% 9 0.0% Tavern/Bar/Liquor Store 167 0.7% 187 0.8% 200 0.8% Business Restaurant 139 0.6% 105 0.4% 103 0.4% Open /Streets Hotel/Motel/Inn 371 1.5% 309 1.3% 261 1.1% 9 0.0% 6 0.0% 8 0.0% 10 0.0% 16 0.1% 7 0.0% 100 0.4% 89 0.4% 93 0.4% 11 0.0% 14 0.1% 6 0.0% Other 144 0.6% 101 0.4% 84 0.3% Casino 17 0.0% 10 0.0% 12 0.1% Recreational Facility 17 0.1% 17 0.1% 15 0.1% Vacant City Lot Abandoned Structure Single Residence Multiple Residence Pharmacy/Doctor’s Office Bank/Savings and Loan Automated Teller Machine Commercial Office Building Storage/Warehouse Park Buildings/Shelters Open Area Lake/Waterway/River TOTAL 24,623 24,159 23,828 34 Single 14,718 70.7% 6,094 29.3% Multiple Hospitality Restaurant 2 0% Hotel/motel 55% Tavern/Bar 25% Public Places Other 4% Hospitality 18% Business 20% Open Area 58% 758 19.9% 2,205 57.9% Hospitality 685 17.9% Other 163 4.3%
  • 35. Domestic Violence Weapon Used Weapon Used Weapon Type 2012 Percent of Total 2011 Percent of Total 2010 Percent of Total Firearm 102 0.42% 101 0.42% 41 0.17% Handgun 250 1.04% 230 0.95% 189 0.80% Rifle 26 0.11% 26 0.11% 37 0.16% Shotgun 46 0.19% 40 0.17% 37 0.16% Knife/Other Cutting Instrument 644 2.67% 650 2.68% 599 2.52% Blunt Object 333 1.38% 337 1.39% 373 1.57% Motor Vehicle 189 0.78% 173 0.71% 206 0.87% 17,538 72.78% 17,436 71.98% 16,779 70.66% Poison 3 0.01% 3 0.01% 1 0.00% Explosive 4 0.02% 4 0.02% 0 0.00% 29 0.12% 17 0.07% 18 0.08% 2 0.01% 2 0.01% 2 0.01% 25 0.10% 25 0.10% 83 0.35% Other Weapons 1,316 5.46% 1,481 6.11% 1,340 5.64% None 2,548 10.57% 2,287 9.44% 2,574 10.84% Unknown 1,042 4.32% 1,410 5.82% 1,468 6.18% TOTAL 24,097 Personal Weapons (Hands/Fist/Feet) Fire/Incendiary Device Drugs/Narcotics Asphyxiation 24,222 23,747 Not all offenses require a weapon to be listed Firearms Personal 18,000 17,500 17,000 16,500 16,000 15,500 15,000 14,500 14,000 13,500 17,436 16,651 17,538 Knife 500 424 397 16,779 367 400 660 650 640 304 289 620 300 599 600 200 15,077 560 540 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 Blunt Object 388 381 380 2010 2011 2009 337 333 180 2012 1,532 1,500 198 189 175 1,474 1,450 1,444 1,379 1,400 1,350 173 1,309 1,300 170 320 2011 Other 190 360 2010 1,550 206 200 373 340 2008 2012 Motor Vehicle 210 400 582 580 100 2008 644 625 1,250 160 1,200 300 150 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 35 2011 2012 1,150 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 36. Domestic Violence Type of Injury Type of Injury Injury Type 2012 Percent of Total Broken Bones 2011 Percent of Total 2010 Percent of Total 89 0.4% 96 0.4% 106 0.5% Possible Internal Injuries 126 0.6% 98 0.4% 142 0.6% Severe Laceration 162 0.7% 153 0.6% 200 0.9% 10,259 45.3% 9,997 42.2% 10,146 45.2% Other Major Injury 75 0.3% 80 0.3% 112 0.5% Loss of Teeth 16 0.1% 14 0.1% 24 0.1% Unconsciousness 43 0.2% 50 0.2% 58 0.3% None 11,891 52.5% 13,207 55.7% 11,674 52.0% TOTAL 22,661 Apparent Minor Injuries 23,695 23,828 Not all reported crimes require this data element Domestic Violence: Type of Injury 3yr Trend 36
  • 37. Domestic Violence Day of Offense Day of the Week :Offense Day 2012 Percent of Total 2011 Percent of Total 2010 Percent of Total Sunday 4,506 18.5% 4,397 18.2% 4,010 16.8% Monday 3,155 12.9% 3,080 12.7% 3,021 12.7% Tuesday 3,165 13.0% 3,086 12.8% 2,889 12.1% Wednesday 3,087 12.7% 3,004 12.4% 3,776 15.8% Thursday 3,076 12.6% 2,975 12.3% 2,952 12.4% Friday 3,196 13.1% 3,276 13.6% 3,280 13.8% Saturday 4,188 17.2% 4,341 18.0% 3,900 16.4% TOTAL 24,373 24,159 23,828 Domestic Violence: Day of the Week 3yr Trend 5000 4500 4000 3500 2010 3000 2011 2500 2012 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday 37 Friday Saturday
  • 38. Domestic Violence Time of Offense Shift 3yr Trend Time of Offense Time 2012 Percent of Total 2011 Percent of Total 2010 Percent of Total 00:00—01:59 2,562 10.5% 2,648 11.0% 2,658 11.2% 02:00—03:59 2,347 9.6% 2,425 10.0% 2,329 8,552 8,705 8,727 Night 9.8% 04:00—05:59 1,415 5.8% 1,459 6.0% 1,463 6.1% 06:00—07:59 1,461 6.0% 1,394 5.8% 1,410 5.9% 08:00—09:59 2,217 9.1% 2,032 8.4% 2,037 2,337 9.6% 2,301 9.5% 2,285 9.6% 12:00—13:59 2,043 8.4% 2,029 8.4% 1,930 1,499 6.1% 1,429 5.9% 1,314 5.5% 16:00—17:59 1,850 7.6% 1,777 7.4% 1,786 7.5% 18:00—19:59 2,122 8.7% 2,138 8.8% 2,035 8.5% 20:00—21:59 2,318 9.5% 2,338 9.7% 2,303 9.7% 22:00—23:59 2,228 9.1% 2,173 9.0% 2,277 9.6% 17 0.1% 16 0.1% 1 2010 8,058 7,756 7,662 Day 8.1% 14:00—15:59 2011 8.5% 10:00—11:59 2012 7,789 7,682 7,438 Evening 0.0% Unknown TOTAL 24,416 24,159 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 Day-6am to 2pm Evening-2pm to 10pm Night-10pm-6am 2012 Percentage Day 33% Night 35% Evening 32% 23,828 Time of Day 3,000 2,500 2,000 2010 2011 1,500 2012 1,000 500 0 0:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 38
  • 39. Domestic Violence Statute Violations 1 Statute Description 2012 2011 2010 08-1543 Pedestrian under the influence of alcohol or drugs 4 9 8 08-1566 Reckless Driving 11 2 9 08-1567 Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs 17 25 35 08-1568 Fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer 9 3 7 08-1599 Transporting an open container 7 3 6 27 20 32 8 9 6 1 0 1 412 348 360 19 19 19 717 627 731 18 16 6 287 869 3,360 4,940 6,524 7,411 10,495 6,140 4,677 80 84 82 21-5402 Murder in the first degree 2 2 21-5403 Murder in the second degree 21-5404 Voluntary Manslaughter 2 21-5412a Assault 21-5412c Assault on a law enforcement officer 21-5412b Aggravated assault 21-5412d Aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer 21-5413 Battery 21-5414a1B1 Domestic Battery; intentional bodily harm caused by a family member 21-5414a2B1 Domestic Battery; physical contact by a family member in a rude manner 21-5413c Battery against a criminal justice officer 21-5413b Aggravated battery 370 388 847 21-5413b1A Aggravated battery; intentional, great bodily harm 146 104 33 21-5413b1B Aggravated battery; intentional, bodily harm 299 205 53 21-5413b1C Aggravated battery; intentional, physical contact 73 68 30 21-5413b2A Aggravated battery; reckless, great bodily harm 40 21 8 21-5413b2B Aggravated battery; reckless, bodily harm 25 22 18 21-5415 Terroristic/Criminal threat 1,225 1,160 1,197 21-5408a Kidnapping 51 47 57 21-5408b Aggravated kidnapping 40 36 31 21-5409 Interference with parental custody 14 20 15 21-5411 Criminal restraint 483 398 520 21-5420a Robbery 19 18 21 21-5420b Aggravated robbery 21 17 20 21-5417 Mistreatment of a dependent adult; physical 9 5 6 21-5427 (all) Stalking 241 151 258 21-5503 Rape; unknown circumstances 86 52 110 21-5503a1A Rape; sexual intercourse with a person who does not consent; force 48 73 72 21-5503a1B Rape; Sexual intercourse with physically powerless victim 2 0 1 39
  • 40. Domestic Violence Statute Violations Statute Description 2012 21-5506 Indecent liberties with a child 0 0 7 21-5506b/b3 Aggravated indecent liberties with a child 3 5 7 21-5504 Criminal sodomy 10 10 8 21-5504b Aggravated criminal sodomy 14 14 40 0 1 1 21-5504b1/b2 Aggravated criminal sodomy; sodomy with a child <14 years of age 2011 2010 21-5504b3A Aggravated criminal sodomy; With person/animal by force 9 0 4 21-5513 Lewd and lascivious behavior 0 0 6 21-5508 Indecent solicitation of a child 0 0 4 21-5508b Aggravated indecent solicitation of a child 0 0 1 21-5510 Sexual exploitation of a child 1 0 1 21-5505a Sexual battery 33 22 22 21-5505b Aggravated sexual battery 6 10 8 21-5509a1 Electronic sexual solicitation of 14 to <16 years of age 0 0 1 21-5509a2 Electronic sexual solicitation of a child <14 years of age 0 0 1 21-5601 Endangering a child; Involves child <18 years of age 127 113 144 21-5602 Abuse of a child; <18 years of age; Intent torture/cruel beating/inhuman punish 25 89 102 21-5607 Furnishing alcohol to a minor 5 6 8 21-5603 Contributing to child's misconduct 2 0 10 21-5428a1 Blackmail; Statement to cause public ridicule 3 0 0 440 259 337 21-5801/5802 Theft 21-5803 Criminal deprivation of property 68 34 41 21-5807 Burglary 38 7 49 21-5807a1 Burglary; building used as a dwelling 33 24 21 21-5807a2 Burglary; building not used as a dwelling 4 1 4 21-5807b Aggravated burglary 83 62 101 21-5812a Arson 14 9 11 21-5812b Aggravated arson 6 12 6 21-5813 Criminal damage to property 3,825 3,142 3,311 21-5808 Criminal trespass 264 246 247 21-5904a2/ 21-5913 Obstructing legal process or official duty 277 242 229 21-5904a1 Falsely reporting a crime 12 7 8 21-5917 False impersonation 1 1 3 21-5909a Intimidation of a witness or victim 46 28 53 40
  • 41. Domestic Violence Statute Violations Statute Description 21-5909b Aggravated intimidation of a witness or victim 21-6206 2012 2011 2010 4 13 15 Harassment by telecom device 750 603 1,005 21-5924 Violation of protective order 136 89 299 21-5924a1 Violation of protective order issued from abuse 844 844 963 299 23 6 22 6 2 127 34 14 2 1 2 21-5924a2/3/4 Violation of protective order; restraining order; pre trial order 21-5924a5 Violation of protective order issued by court post disposition 21-5924a6 Violation of protective order issued from stalking 21-6101 Eavesdropping 21-6203 Disorderly conduct 521 712 966 21-6203a1 Disorderly conduct; brawling and fighting 161 92 57 21-6203a3 Disorderly conduct; offensive language, noisy conduct 514 244 263 21-6302 Criminal Carrying of a weapon 7 2 5 21-6301 Criminal use of a weapon 24 23 13 21-6305 Aggravated weapons violation 4 5 1 21-6304 Criminal possession of firearm 21 11 9 21-6308 Unlawful discharge of firearms 16 18 9 5 2 6 Drug Offenses 446 409 400 Other 107 153 48 29,685 25,076 29,139 21-6412 Drug Offense Other Cruelty to animals 3 TOTAL 1)There are instances where multiple statutes are reported within one domestic incident 2) Homicides that involve victims under the age of 18 are included in this number 3)All drug offenses are combined for this report Effective July 1, 2011, the Kansas Legislature recodified most criminal statutes. This resulted in new statute notations for most criminal offenses. The statute numbers listed in this section are based on January 1, 2012. The data presented include information from all statute numbers related to the corresponding offenses. 41
  • 42. Protection from Abuse Act K.S.A. 60-3101 through 60-3112 PFA Filings The Kansas Legislature created the Protection from Abuse Act (PFA) in 1979. According to the statute, “this act shall be liberally construed to promote the protection of victims of domestic violence from bodily injury or threats of bodily injury and to facilitate access to judicial protection for the victims, whether represented by counsel or proceeding pro se.” Year Filings Percent of Change 1995 7,678 14.38% 1996 7,506 -2.24% 1997 7,968 6.16% A protection order is a court order for the purpose of preventing further violent or threatening behavior. The PFA instructs a specific individual to refrain from having contact with another individual. Any district court shall have jurisdiction over the proceedings in obtaining an order. A person who is seeking relief under this act may obtain a petition from the clerk of the district court or from a domestic violence program. 1998 7,361 -7.62% 1999 7,691 4.48% 2000 7,300 5.08% 2001 8,140 11.51% 2002 8,548 5.01% A person seeking relief under this act must have lived with the abuser either presently or in the past or have a child in common. A parent or an adult residing with a minor child may seek a petition on behalf of the minor child. As of July 1, 2002, persons in dating relationships also can apply for a protection order. Once an order is filed with the court a temporary order is issued and a hearing is set within 20 days. The final order can be issued for up to one year. No more than two orders can be filed within one year. 2003 7,672 -10.25% 2004 7,914 3.15% 2005 8,222 3.89% 2006 7,942 -3.41% 2007 7,903 -0.01% 2008 7,963 0.01% The 2006 Kansas Legislature passed two bills designed to assist those in need of protective orders. The first would fill the gap of previous statutes by making contact while being incarcerated a violation of the PFA Act. The second, took effect January 1, 2007, and allows persons attempting to escape a domestic violence situation to obtain a confidential address from the Secretary of State’s office to use as a substitute legal mailing address. 2009 8,391 5.38% 2010 8,548 1.87% 2011 8,238 -3.63% 2012 8,422 2.23% The following information reflects the number of PFA orders filed with Kansas district courts and reported to the Kansas Office of Judicial Administration. 9000 8500 8000 7500 7000 6500 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 All temporary, amended and final PFA orders are entered into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) Protection Order File. This database is another tool to assist law enforcement officers in verifying the existence of an order quickly in order to provide better enforcement. However, an order does not need to be entered into NCIC in order to be enforced. 42
  • 43. 43 63 35 62 2 113 56 46 127 7 13 65 3 4 18 23 12 5 68 173 2 52 12 240 8 7 37 Anderson Atchison Barber Barton Bourbon Brown Butler Chase Chautauqua Cherokee Cheyenne Clark Clay Cloud Coffey Comanche Cowley Crawford Decatur Dickinson Doniphan Douglas Edwards Elk Ellis 1996 Allen County 32 0 2 259 20 36 3 174 53 3 22 26 12 1 3 67 18 6 122 35 55 119 1 42 28 71 1997 28 1 6 231 12 26 3 128 40 1 22 30 16 2 3 56 12 2 92 43 53 136 2 19 14 68 1998 48 7 4 242 22 18 5 134 35 0 14 49 15 8 5 48 9 13 109 32 42 89 3 12 38 67 1999 44 6 6 231 23 26 3 122 57 0 13 38 16 2 12 25 23 6 102 40 31 103 3 14 60 61 2000 40 13 6 297 12 56 7 72 88 4 15 28 18 4 9 34 21 9 130 50 40 104 7 24 42 11 2001 54 8 10 328 19 70 5 105 95 3 16 26 12 4 10 42 10 15 139 43 50 105 6 21 38 29 2002 53 12 4 258 23 66 3 98 82 2 13 23 13 2 15 43 15 9 121 57 24 106 4 32 43 34 2003 62 8 8 213 28 53 9 92 93 0 18 25 26 2 3 52 16 12 121 45 14 84 5 34 37 25 2004 55 10 4 230 14 59 7 93 86 0 32 24 28 1 3 37 9 7 114 47 23 113 13 37 40 20 2005 41 10 8 232 11 62 10 93 124 2 19 20 28 3 2 31 19 4 116 22 21 87 14 29 37 33 2006 33 6 7 215 13 52 9 98 116 1 20 22 20 0 3 32 23 10 115 32 26 112 12 24 30 45 2007 5 6 8 266 12 58 5 101 122 1 28 23 28 3 4 35 18 10 151 28 19 95 9 32 31 32 2008 29 7 5 295 16 61 7 118 93 2 30 25 26 4 3 45 21 11 136 35 27 112 4 45 34 39 2009 38 3 6 296 8 76 5 132 84 2 39 18 27 1 5 35 12 5 122 30 38 96 6 35 31 51 2010 Protection From Abuse Filings by County 42 4 5 310 12 61 10 127 90 4 29 16 24 2 4 40 12 4 105 26 40 116 10 35 21 45 2011 48 4 3 330 7 87 10 112 116 3 24 15 20 4 3 31 13 4 134 30 32 84 17 47 28 55 2012
  • 44. 44 1 4 36 5 0 13 1 7 70 4 0 22 24 0 711 6 12 6 83 1 Gove Graham Grant Gray Greeley Greenwood Hamilton Harper Harvey Haskell Hodgeman Jackson Jefferson Jewell Johnson Kearny Kingman Kiowa Labette Lane 352 167 Geary Leavenworth 110 69 Ford Franklin 122 10 1996 Finney Ellsworth County 204 2 91 7 21 6 774 1 23 24 1 1 53 10 4 9 1 2 32 1 0 145 141 103 83 10 1997 8 334 1 72 3 14 4 592 3 20 23 2 1 44 7 5 16 1 0 20 4 2 124 86 92 42 1998 376 1 57 6 8 6 593 5 21 35 0 2 98 13 15 5 1 1 34 0 3 161 125 77 51 10 1999 7 289 0 50 5 11 4 702 3 26 19 0 1 102 10 12 5 0 5 30 4 2 142 83 100 60 2000 4 359 4 41 4 13 12 846 4 34 35 1 0 97 28 4 4 3 7 9 6 1 194 81 118 67 2001 5 350 6 57 4 15 9 852 2 53 59 2 0 60 37 5 12 0 4 4 3 1 159 124 91 91 2002 234 2 34 4 9 7 872 8 63 42 7 5 14 26 6 6 0 1 20 2 2 117 116 58 68 13 2003 6 242 3 43 6 21 8 772 5 31 33 2 2 36 7 6 13 1 1 27 1 0 174 132 53 59 2004 289 4 41 7 16 7 814 4 36 35 4 2 80 9 8 6 0 5 14 5 3 134 142 56 52 10 2005 7 270 5 31 3 16 4 773 2 36 39 3 5 66 15 9 11 2 6 6 4 2 151 109 77 54 2006 284 3 30 2 14 4 727 3 40 32 1 5 65 18 14 2 0 4 21 5 0 137 121 59 36 13 2007 0 253 2 45 2 13 6 786 1 52 27 4 1 56 10 4 8 3 4 19 4 0 128 155 49 36 2008 266 1 51 6 14 6 774 4 38 28 4 5 85 8 3 15 0 0 19 4 9 155 121 38 56 14 2009 258 3 29 6 15 4 790 3 49 30 4 2 98 9 9 8 0 5 20 2 6 162 113 44 72 19 2010 Protection From Abuse Filings by County 234 1 37 3 15 4 698 1 42 27 4 5 91 9 8 10 1 7 15 4 4 133 106 43 53 18 2011 271 2 22 2 14 7 764 0 34 30 4 5 109 4 5 13 0 7 15 5 0 156 99 50 70 17 2012
  • 45. 45 8 95 34 33 37 1 100 10 Lyon Marion Marshall McPherson Meade Miami Mitchell 8 64 2 21 66 6 7 15 11 23 16 1 Nemaha Neosho Ness Norton Osage Osborne Ottawa Pawnee Phillips Pottawatomie Pratt Rawlins Republic 9 198 8 Morton Reno 22 Morris 149 2 Logan Montgomery 40 Linn 1996 Lincoln County 6 3 312 0 10 35 13 27 11 6 63 17 0 93 14 3 14 151 10 119 3 38 32 32 97 7 30 1997 5 3 362 0 17 30 13 23 12 5 52 16 1 61 11 2 24 158 13 123 3 46 28 30 102 7 32 1998 7 4 341 1 17 40 9 28 1 1 78 10 0 84 21 3 9 161 6 101 1 51 35 20 140 8 32 1999 6 4 387 4 27 38 11 24 10 4 76 9 1 84 12 1 24 144 6 89 2 58 22 22 101 11 27 2000 5 10 316 0 15 46 17 27 10 2 63 12 3 42 15 2 9 55 8 147 1 69 30 28 86 8 42 2001 6 6 351 4 25 55 7 15 9 6 61 10 7 32 25 13 13 60 10 99 1 14 27 73 104 11 25 2002 6 3 294 0 32 47 11 33 7 7 54 12 3 49 11 15 19 73 14 112 1 67 16 19 101 12 35 2003 5 10 286 3 19 60 11 24 10 10 56 8 3 45 18 8 21 75 7 133 1 66 18 26 90 11 29 2004 2 3 336 1 35 61 15 34 9 7 60 5 8 28 15 9 12 66 8 97 4 51 21 35 90 7 35 2005 4 8 234 5 25 40 19 20 9 5 81 4 8 23 13 10 0 10 2 76 3 61 16 21 85 5 32 2006 8 9 262 1 22 44 16 18 1 2 76 3 8 25 8 5 0 49 4 84 4 54 16 27 54 5 32 2007 4 4 268 2 28 47 9 26 11 4 55 9 7 42 14 5 9 72 5 74 5 62 22 30 69 6 22 2008 4 8 234 3 37 37 12 31 5 3 77 10 2 36 21 7 12 77 7 56 2 52 19 18 59 9 37 2009 5 5 234 3 34 51 11 28 11 5 80 8 6 53 8 5 7 78 1 73 4 52 17 36 74 9 22 2010 Protection From Abuse Filings by County 2 4 224 4 32 43 5 21 10 3 106 12 3 42 12 5 12 84 5 75 3 51 11 21 77 4 12 2011 1 4 197 5 31 47 24 20 8 2 96 6 7 43 21 9 11 69 8 82 1 58 20 26 65 6 26 2012
  • 46. 46 8 2 20 216 5 Rooks Rush Russell Saline Scott 72 792 1 11 5 16 5 6 31 26 4 11 5 9 2 43 16 600 7,506 Seward Shawnee Sheridan Sherman Smith Stafford Stanton Stevens Sumner Thomas Trego Wabaunsee Wallace Washington Wichita Wilson Woodson Wyandotte TOTALS 1,419 95 Riley Sedgwick 16 1996 Rice County 7,968 743 9 45 3 7 2 5 3 30 32 8 3 4 8 17 1 869 36 1,612 5 269 29 1 8 93 24 1997 7,361 615 14 44 2 7 8 8 1 24 28 8 0 12 1 16 3 850 41 1,583 3 213 29 0 5 83 20 1998 7,691 666 15 42 0 6 2 4 3 27 36 3 0 14 5 21 4 707 53 1,683 2 263 25 1 8 99 16 1999 7,300 815 9 25 1 5 6 6 2 23 37 7 2 12 5 23 3 677 66 1,209 8 248 34 1 7 100 26 2000 8,140 1,041 6 8 2 2 5 14 3 18 62 8 1 9 6 13 3 803 56 1,406 6 297 23 3 10 130 20 2001 8,548 1,148 3 12 1 3 5 9 2 28 57 5 1 6 10 20 5 716 68 1,637 4 294 26 7 9 86 38 2002 7,672 678 5 18 3 5 0 9 2 15 79 3 2 12 10 15 3 628 75 1,746 5 271 24 1 5 92 32 2003 7,914 689 8 11 1 8 5 17 4 17 71 8 2 12 7 11 1 771 75 1,923 4 275 13 3 7 124 33 2004 8,222 685 8 18 1 7 4 8 5 29 65 12 3 9 12 26 3 814 43 2,025 4 306 14 1 7 122 41 2005 7,942 669 8 22 0 6 3 10 2 16 66 7 2 6 8 17 2 808 29 2,156 6 295 27 3 6 114 30 2006 7,903 659 8 19 1 7 2 7 0 33 79 9 3 9 8 14 4 836 48 2,068 7 315 24 2 6 125 45 2007 7,963 613 4 22 2 7 0 7 2 16 63 6 1 16 6 10 4 817 49 2,147 8 249 23 7 5 147 23 2008 8,391 708 8 15 0 7 3 10 4 32 72 4 5 18 9 28 4 760 60 2,317 6 285 16 4 11 145 31 2009 8,548 718 8 33 1 11 1 9 2 16 42 6 6 6 4 20 2 1007 53 2,247 3 260 34 4 13 131 30 2010 Protection From Abuse Filings by County 8,238 680 6 24 2 7 0 9 1 28 49 11 4 10 5 27 3 870 40 2,332 3 246 31 6 11 153 30 2011 8,422 605 9 26 1 4 1 5 4 17 71 7 3 11 12 16 8 913 37 2,315 9 286 24 5 18 135 21 2012
  • 47. Violation of Protective Order K.S.A. 21-5924 by County 2012 County 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 County County 2012 2011 2010 Greeley 0 0 0 Osborne 0 0 0 4 Greenwood 1 0 2 Ottawa 1 1 0 2 1 Hamilton DNR DNR 0 Pawnee 9 8 2 0 0 2 Harper 0 2 2 Phillips 2 2 2 Barton 34 38 39 Harvey 41 70 75 24 32 26 Bourbon 21 24 12 Haskell DNR DNR 0 Pratt 5 2 4 Brown 4 6 7 Rawlins 0 0 0 Butler 27 40 198 120 89 Chase 0 Chautauqua 1 Allen 5 1 11 Anderson 6 3 Atchison 0 Barber Hodgeman 0 0 1 49 Jackson 7 8 15 Reno 0 1 Jefferson 24 19 17 Republic 1 1 0 0 3 Jewell Rice 4 10 6 DNR DNR DNR 1 56 44 73 Riley 16 0 0 DNR 1 3 Rooks 1 1 2 Kingman 3 8 2 Rush 1 1 4 6 Kiowa 1 0 2 Russell 5 8 7 3 5 Labette 19 24 12 Saline 0 42 199 7 5 Lane 0 3 0 Scott 2 1 1 1 DNR 0 Leavenworth 110 106 87 Sedgwick 70 59 62 34 48 2 1 0 Seward 16 10 10 20 9 9 Cherokee 6 6 7 Johnson Cheyenne 4 4 2 Kearny Clark 0 1 0 Clay 8 7 Cloud 5 Coffey 1 Comanche Cowley Pottawatomie 38 Lincoln 1 Linn 3 0 12 Shawnee 0 Logan 4 3 1 Sheridan 0 0 0 33 20 Lyon 2 1 3 Sherman 2 3 0 1 7 1 Marion 18 5 1 Smith 0 Douglas 177 161 129 Marshall 1 0 3 Stafford 0 0 2 Edwards 0 2 0 McPherson 18 19 23 Stanton 0 0 0 Elk 0 2 0 Meade 0 1 0 Stevens 0 0 1 Ellis 31 28 26 Miami 14 10 19 Sumner 14 22 29 2 7 2 Mitchell 3 4 0 Thomas 3 4 7 Finney 17 11 18 Montgomery 7 15 14 Trego 0 0 2 Ford 17 17 17 Morris 1 5 3 Wabaunsee 2 1 1 Franklin 53 22 29 Morton 0 1 0 Wallace 0 0 0 Geary 59 60 64 Nemaha 2 2 2 Washington 1 0 0 Gove 0 0 1 Neosho 15 23 19 Wichita 2 2 0 Graham 0 0 0 Ness 1 0 1 Wilson 9 6 3 Grant 3 1 7 Norton 3 4 3 Woodson 1 3 3 Gray 1 1 1 Osage 38 13 26 Wyandotte 1 9 24 9 12 22 17 0 0 Dickinson 26 Doniphan Crawford Decatur Ellsworth TOTAL 1) Summary Agencies within this county did not report this data 47 1,372 DNR DNR 1,314 1,435
  • 48. Protection From Stalking Act K.S.A. 60-31a01 through 60-31a09 The Kansas Legislature created the Protection from Stalking Act (PFS) during the 2002 session. The statute is to be “liberally construed to protect victims of stalking and to facilitate access to judicial protection for stalking victims, whether represented by counsel or proceedings pro se.” The PFS allows the court to refrain a defendant from harassing, telephoning, contacting or otherwise communicating with the victim. A Protection From Stalking Order is a court order for the purpose of preventing stalking behavior against the victim. A person seeking relief under this act may obtain an order from the clerk of the district court in the county where the stalking occurred. Once an order is filed with the court a temporary order is issued and a hearing is set within 20 days. A final order may be issued for a period of one year. However, “upon motion by the plaintiff, such a period may be extended for an additional year.” The following information reports the number of PFS orders filed with Kansas district courts and reported to the Kansas Office of Judicial Administration. Protection From Stalking Orders Number of Court Filings 2002-2012 YEAR 2002 1 PFA Filings 6,000 1,073 2003 2,577 2004 3,036 2005 3,405 2006 4,093 2007 4,159 2008 4,508 2009 4,756 2010 5,089 2011 5,202 2012 5,066 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 20 02 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1) The protection from stalking orders law became effective July 1, 2002. Therefore, the 2002 data is for six months. 48
  • 49. Protection From Stalking Order Court Filings by County County 2010 2011 2012 County 2010 2011 2012 County 2012 2011 2010 8 7 12 Greeley 0 0 1 Osborne 4 0 1 Anderson 13 26 23 Greenwood 1 5 5 Ottawa 2 6 8 Atchison 41 54 30 Hamilton 4 9 2 Pawnee 31 16 11 Barber 26 9 10 Harper 1 3 2 Phillips 10 15 16 Barton 64 72 75 Harvey 22 39 31 Pottawatomie 45 43 55 5 13 9 Haskell 1 1 3 Pratt 15 13 15 Brown 14 12 12 Hodgeman 0 0 2 Rawlins 0 2 0 Butler 53 52 47 Jackson 26 28 31 Reno 128 121 128 Chase 6 7 1 Jefferson 13 28 30 Republic 1 10 7 Chautauqua 7 4 3 Jewell 10 1 3 Rice 20 21 15 Cherokee 1 15 3 Johnson 552 589 487 Riley 157 160 112 Cheyenne 6 1 2 Kearny 3 0 0 Rooks 16 14 11 Clark 3 0 0 Kingman 13 12 8 Rush 8 6 2 Clay 17 13 19 Kiowa 2 1 2 Russell 12 17 19 Cloud 0 5 2 Labette 9 6 3 Saline 243 224 189 Coffey 31 20 35 Lane 3 1 1 Scott 1 9 6 3 6 2 199 200 193 Cowley 43 40 63 Lincoln 0 3 1 Crawford 36 45 44 Linn 8 6 10 Decatur 10 4 18 Logan 5 8 Dickinson 57 66 77 Lyon 43 Doniphan 13 8 2 Marion Douglas 219 188 243 Marshall Edwards 3 0 3 McPherson Elk 3 5 5 Ellis 18 29 3 Finney Allen Bourbon Comanche Leavenworth Sedgwick 1,190 1,274 1,201 12 12 10 Shawnee 588 502 518 6 Sheridan 2 0 5 43 51 Sherman 1 5 1 5 10 5 Smith 2 0 0 1 3 1 Stafford 4 4 5 23 23 40 Stanton 0 0 0 Meade 3 1 2 Stevens 4 4 4 35 Miami 54 60 55 Sumner 36 31 74 12 16 Mitchell 1 7 6 Thomas 4 26 10 10 30 19 Montgomery 15 24 11 Trego 3 1 3 Ford 18 16 18 Morris 6 2 8 Wabaunsee 9 6 8 Franklin 71 82 102 Morton 6 5 5 Wallace 0 2 0 Geary 125 96 70 Nemaha 15 6 25 Washington 3 11 6 Gove 0 1 2 Neosho 3 5 9 Wichita 1 2 1 Graham 1 0 2 Ness 8 7 5 Wilson 2 9 5 Grant 2 4 3 Norton 8 3 2 Woodson 0 0 3 Gray 1 1 1 Osage 61 51 51 Wyandotte 480 503 504 Ellsworth Seward TOTAL 49 5,089 5,202 5,066
  • 50. Stalking Stalking is unlike any other person crime not only in its general characteristics, but also in the impact it has on the daily lives of victims. Many people do not take the crime of stalking seriously, while others blame the victim. Stalking is an exercise of control and power over another individual or group. The variation in stalking behavior ranges from hang-up phone calls to more direct threats toward a victim. The likelihood of injury increases when the stalking behavior escalates over time. In 2008, the Kansas Legislature passed, and the Governor signed into law, Senate Bill 414 which expands the definition of Stalking under K.S.A. This is reflected in the large increase of offenses reported since 2009. Stalking is defined as: (1) “Intentionally or recklessly engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person which would cause a reasonable person in the circumstances of the targeted person to fear for such person’s safety, or the safety of a member of such person’s immediate family and the targeted person is actually placed in such fear; or (2) intentionally engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person which the individual knows will place the targeted person in fear for such person’s safety or the safety of a member of such person’s immediate family; or (3) after being served with, or otherwise provided notice of, any protective order included in K.S.A. 213843, prior to its repeal or K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-5924, and amendments thereto, that prohibits contact with a targeted person, recklessly engaging in at least one act listed in subsection (f)(1) that violates the provisions of the order and would cause a reasonable person to fear for such person's safety, or the safety of a member of such person's immediate family and the targeted person is actually placed in such fear. YEAR Offenses Percent Change 2001 199 2002 173 -13.07% 2003 238 37.57% Stalking Trends 2000-2012 -11.56% 900 777 800 2004 275 15.55% 700 2005 242 -12.00% 600 2006 193 -20.25% 500 2007 211 9.33% 558 400 300 2008 281 33.18% 2009 558 98.58% 592 6.09% 0 2011 777 31.25% 2012 713 238 100 2010 225 199 -8.24% 200 173 50 275 281 242 193 211 592 713
  • 51. Stalking Victim and Offender Characteristics Victim (Agencies that filled out summary sheets are not included. Incidents may include more than one victim or suspect) Age Female Male Unknown Total White Black Indian Asian Unknown Total % of Total Under 10 3 4 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 7 1.2% 10-14 7 6 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 13 2.3% 15-19 52 6 0 58 58 0 0 0 0 58 10.2% 20-24 79 11 0 90 81 7 0 2 0 90 15.8% 25-29 92 8 0 100 95 4 0 1 0 100 17.5% 30-34 83 19 0 102 98 4 0 0 0 102 17.9% 35-39 54 8 0 62 57 2 3 0 0 62 10.9% 40-44 30 12 0 42 39 3 0 0 0 42 7.4% 45-49 32 4 0 36 34 2 0 0 0 36 6.3% 50-54 21 4 0 25 24 1 0 0 0 25 4.4% 55-59 11 5 0 16 14 2 0 0 0 16 2.8% 60-64 5 3 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 8 1.4% 65-69 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0.5% 70-74 3 1 0 4 3 0 0 1 0 4 0.7% 75 Plus 1 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0.5% Unknown 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0.4% 478 93 0 571 539 25 3 4 0 571 Total Suspect (Agencies that filled out summary sheets are not included. Incidents may include more than one victim or suspect) Age Female Male Unknown Total White Black Indian Asian Unknown Total % of Total Under 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 10-14 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.4% 15-19 12 32 0 44 38 6 0 0 0 44 8.2% 20-24 13 38 0 51 48 2 0 0 1 51 9.5% 25-29 11 70 0 81 70 10 0 0 1 81 15.0% 30-34 7 84 0 91 79 10 0 2 0 91 16.9% 35-39 9 60 0 69 58 6 3 0 2 69 12.8% 40-44 8 58 0 66 63 3 0 0 0 66 12.2% 45-49 5 26 0 31 30 1 0 0 0 31 5.8% 50-54 7 27 0 34 30 4 0 0 0 34 6.3% 55-59 1 10 0 11 11 0 0 0 0 11 2.0% 60-64 3 12 0 15 14 0 0 0 1 15 2.8% 65-69 1 7 0 8 7 1 0 0 0 8 1.5% 70-74 0 3 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 3 0.6% 75 Plus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Unknown 6 13 14 33 10 6 0 1 16 33 6.1% 84 441 14 539 461 51 3 3 21 539 Total 51
  • 52. Stalking Victim to Offender Relationship Relationship 2012 Percent of Total 2011 Percent of Total 2010 Percent of Total 43 5.52% 81 9.42% 39 Common Law Spouse 6 0.77% 8 0.93% 5 0.75% Parent 6 0.77% 5 0.58% 1 0.15% Child 13 1.67% 18 2.09% 7 1.05% Sibling 2 0.26% 3 0.35% 5 0.75% Grandparent 3 0.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Grandchild 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% In-Law 6 0.77% 6 0.70% 7 1.05% Step-parent 2 0.26% 3 0.35% 1 0.15% Step-child 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.15% Step-sibling 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.0% Foster Parent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.0% Foster Child 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.0% Foster Sibling 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.0% 10 1.28% 8 0.93% 3 0.45% 149 19.13% 145 16.86% 111 16.72% Friend 7 0.90% 15 1.74% 15 2.26% Roommates 0 0.00% 1 0.12% 1 0.15% 24 3.08% 18 2.09% 8 1.20% Boyfriend/Girlfriend 103 13.22% 152 17.67% 88 13.25% Ex-Boyfriend/Girlfriend 157 20.15% 98 11.40% 145 21.84% Child of Boyfriend/ Girlfriend 1 0.13% 3 0.35% 1 0.15% BF/GF of Suspect’s Parent 2 0.26% 0 0.00% 1 0.15% Homosexual Relationship 3 0.39% 3 0.35% 2 0.30% 88 11.30% 94 10.93% 75 11.30% Employer/Employee 4 0.51% 3 0.35% 1 0.15% Co-Worker 5 0.64% 1 0.12% 2 0.30% Otherwise Known 70 8.99% 91 10.58% 64 9.64% Relationship Unknown 49 6.29% 75 8.72% 54 8.13% Stranger 26 3.34% 29 3.37% 27 4.07% TOTAL 779 2012 Current vs. Former Dating 5.87% Spouse Other Family Member Acquaintance Neighbor Dating 40% Ex-Dating 60% 2012 Current vs. Former Spouse Spouse 33% ExSpouse 67% 2012 Known vs. Unknown Unknown 10% Known 90% Relationship: 3yr Trend 2012 2011 Ex-Spouse 860 664 52 2010 0 50 Ex-Dating 100 150 200 Dating
  • 53. Stalking Location of Offense Location 2012 Percent of Total 2011 Percent of Total 2010 Percent of Total Business/Residential Parking Lot/Garage 16 2.24% 20 2.57% 15 2.53% Street 88 12.34% 72 9.27% 48 8.11% Alley 1 0.14% 4 0.51% 0 0.00% Highway 4 0.56% 1 0.13% 3 0.51% Rural Road 1 0.14% 6 0.77% 3 0.51% 383 53.72% 421 54.18% 326 55.07% 93 13.04% 123 15.83% 76 12.84% Nursing Care Facility 1 0.14% 6 0.77% 0 0.00% Dormitory/Sorority/Fraternity 2 0.28% 3 0.39% 4 0.68% College/University/Propriety School 8 1.12% 7 0.90% 12 2.03% 12 1.68% 12 1.54% 11 1.86% Church/Synagogue/Temple 2 0.28% 1 0.13% 2 0.34% Government/Tax-Payer Funded Bldg 8 1.12% 13 1.67% 8 1.35% Jail/Prison 1 0.14% 8 1.03% 7 1.18% Hospital 3 0.42% 2 0.26% 2 0.34% Pharmacy/Doctor’s Office 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 4 0.68% Bank/Savings and Loan 2 0.28% 5 0.64% 2 0.34% 17 2.38% 17 2.19% 15 2.53% Service/Gas Station 7 0.98% 4 0.51% 2 0.34% Convenience Store 6 0.84% 9 1.16% 9 1.52% Department/Discount Store 8 1.12% 9 1.16% 8 1.35% Grocery/Supermarket 7 0.98% 6 0.77% 6 1.01% Specialty Store 7 0.98% 6 0.77% 6 1.01% Mall Commons 0 0.00% 2 0.26% 1 0.17% Open Space Tavern/Bar/Liquor Store 3 0.42% 5 0.64% 3 0.51% Residential 16 2.24% 3 0.39% 4 0.68% Hotel/Motel/Inn 5 0.70% 2 0.26% 4 0.68% Air/Bus Terminal 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.17% Storage/Warehouse 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Park Buildings/Shelters 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Open Area 2 0.28% 3 0.39% 1 0.17% Lake/Waterway/River 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Other 8 1.12% 7 0.90% 7 1.18% Casino 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 0.34% Recreational Facility 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Car Wash 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Single Residence Multiple Residence All Other Schools Commercial Office Building Restaurant TOTAL 713 777 53 592 Business 16% Open Space 16% Residential 68% Roads Rural Road 4% Highway 4% Parking Lot 22% Street 70% Residential Multiple 20% Single 80% Location: 3yr Trend 2012 2011 2010 Business 0 200 400 600
  • 54. Stalking Day of Offense Day of the Week :Offense Day 2012 Percent of Total 2011 Percent of Total 2010 Percent of Total Sunday 100 14.03% 94 12.10% 74 12.50% Monday 94 13.18% 117 15.06% 85 14.36% Tuesday 97 13.60% 125 16.09% 84 14.19% 118 16.55% 95 12.23% 91 15.37% Thursday 99 13.88% 105 13.51% 90 15.20% Friday 94 13.18% 118 15.19% 93 15.71% Saturday 111 15.57% 123 15.83% 75 12.67% TOTAL 713 Wednesday 777 592 Stalking: Day of Offense 3yr Trend 140 120 100 80 2010 60 2011 2012 40 20 0 54