SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 49
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Crosstabs
Gender * BackgroundImage Crosstabulation
Background
Image
Total
1.00 2.00 6.00
Gender
1.00
Count 22 6 5 33
% within
Gender
66.7% 18.2% 15.2% 100.0%
% within
Background
Image
44.0% 46.2% 50.0% 45.2%
% of Total 30.1% 8.2% 6.8% 45.2%
2.00
Count 28 7 5 40
% within
Gender
70.0% 17.5% 12.5% 100.0%
% within
Background
Image
56.0% 53.8% 50.0% 54.8%
% of Total 38.4% 9.6% 6.8% 54.8%
Total
Count 50 13 10 73
% within
Gender
68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
% within
Background
Image
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
GradeLevel * BackgroundImage Crosstabulation
Backgroun
dImage
Total
1.00 2.00 6.00
GradeL
evel
1.00
Count 1 1 2 4
% within
GradeLeve
l
25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
2.0% 7.7% 20.0% 5.5%
% of Total 1.4% 1.4% 2.7% 5.5%
2.00
Count 3 0 1 4
% within
GradeLeve
l
75.0% 0.0% 25.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
6.0% 0.0% 10.0% 5.5%
% of Total 4.1% 0.0% 1.4% 5.5%
3.00
Count 15 1 5 21
% within
GradeLeve
l
71.4% 4.8% 23.8% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
30.0% 7.7% 50.0% 28.8%
% of Total 20.5% 1.4% 6.8% 28.8%
4.00
Count 31 11 2 44
% within
GradeLeve
l
70.5% 25.0% 4.5% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
62.0% 84.6% 20.0% 60.3%
% of Total 42.5% 15.1% 2.7% 60.3%
Total
Count 50 13 10 73
% within
GradeLeve
l
68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
Concentration * BackgroundImage Crosstabulation
Backgroun
dImage
Total
1.00 2.00 6.00
Concen
tration
1.00
Count 12 3 2 17
% within
Concentrat
ion
70.6% 17.6% 11.8% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
24.0% 23.1% 20.0% 23.3%
% of Total 16.4% 4.1% 2.7% 23.3%
2.00
Count 5 0 0 5
% within
Concentrat
ion
100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8%
% of Total 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8%
3.00 Count 2 0 0 2
% within
Concentrat
ion
100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
% of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
4.00
Count 5 5 1 11
% within
Concentrat
ion
45.5% 45.5% 9.1% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
10.0% 38.5% 10.0% 15.1%
% of Total 6.8% 6.8% 1.4% 15.1%
5.00
Count 9 2 4 15
% within
Concentrat
ion
60.0% 13.3% 26.7% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
18.0% 15.4% 40.0% 20.5%
% of Total 12.3% 2.7% 5.5% 20.5%
6.00
Count 17 3 3 23
% within
Concentrat
ion
73.9% 13.0% 13.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
34.0% 23.1% 30.0% 31.5%
% of Total 23.3% 4.1% 4.1% 31.5%
Total Count 50 13 10 73
% within
Concentrat
ion
68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
Gender * BackgroundImage
Crosstab
Backgroun
dImage
Total
1.00 2.00 6.00
Gender
1.00
Count 22 6 5 33
% within
Gender
66.7% 18.2% 15.2% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
44.0% 46.2% 50.0% 45.2%
% of Total 30.1% 8.2% 6.8% 45.2%
2.00
Count 28 7 5 40
% within
Gender
70.0% 17.5% 12.5% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
56.0% 53.8% 50.0% 54.8%
% of Total 38.4% 9.6% 6.8% 54.8%
Total Count 50 13 10 73
% within
Gender
68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
GradeLevel * BackgroundImage
Crosstab
Backgroun
dImage
Total
1.00 2.00 6.00
GradeL
evel
1.00
Count 1 1 2 4
% within
GradeLeve
l
25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
2.0% 7.7% 20.0% 5.5%
% of Total 1.4% 1.4% 2.7% 5.5%
2.00
Count 3 0 1 4
% within
GradeLeve
l
75.0% 0.0% 25.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
6.0% 0.0% 10.0% 5.5%
% of Total 4.1% 0.0% 1.4% 5.5%
3.00
Count 15 1 5 21
% within
GradeLeve
l
71.4% 4.8% 23.8% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
30.0% 7.7% 50.0% 28.8%
% of Total 20.5% 1.4% 6.8% 28.8%
4.00
Count 31 11 2 44
% within
GradeLeve
l
70.5% 25.0% 4.5% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
62.0% 84.6% 20.0% 60.3%
% of Total 42.5% 15.1% 2.7% 60.3%
Total
Count 50 13 10 73
% within
GradeLeve
l
68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
Concentration * BackgroundImage
Crosstab
Backgroun
dImage
Total
1.00 2.00 6.00
Concen
tration
1.00
Count 12 3 2 17
% within
Concentrat
ion
70.6% 17.6% 11.8% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
24.0% 23.1% 20.0% 23.3%
% of Total 16.4% 4.1% 2.7% 23.3%
2.00 Count 5 0 0 5
% within
Concentrat
ion
100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8%
% of Total 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8%
3.00
Count 2 0 0 2
% within
Concentrat
ion
100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
% of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
4.00
Count 5 5 1 11
% within
Concentrat
ion
45.5% 45.5% 9.1% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
10.0% 38.5% 10.0% 15.1%
% of Total 6.8% 6.8% 1.4% 15.1%
5.00
Count 9 2 4 15
% within
Concentrat
ion
60.0% 13.3% 26.7% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
18.0% 15.4% 40.0% 20.5%
% of Total 12.3% 2.7% 5.5% 20.5%
6.00 Count 17 3 3 23
% within
Concentrat
ion
73.9% 13.0% 13.0% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
34.0% 23.1% 30.0% 31.5%
% of Total 23.3% 4.1% 4.1% 31.5%
Total
Count 50 13 10 73
% within
Concentrat
ion
68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
% within
Backgroun
dImage
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
Gender * TopResource
Crosstab
TopResource
1.00 2.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Gender
1.00
Count 16 2 2 0 5
% within
Gender
48.5% 6.1% 6.1% 0.0% 15.2%
% within
TopResour
ce
51.6% 25.0% 66.7% 0.0% 38.5%
% of Total 21.9% 2.7% 2.7% 0.0% 6.8%
2.00 Count 15 6 1 2 8
% within
Gender
37.5% 15.0% 2.5% 5.0% 20.0%
% within
TopResour
ce
48.4% 75.0% 33.3% 100.0% 61.5%
% of Total 20.5% 8.2% 1.4% 2.7% 11.0%
Total
Count 31 8 3 2 13
% within
Gender
42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8%
% within
TopResour
ce
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8%
GradeLevel * TopResource
Crosstab
TopResource
1.00 2.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
GradeL
evel
1.00
Count 1 1 0 0 1
% within
GradeLeve
l
25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%
% within
TopResour
ce
3.2% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7%
% of Total 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4%
2.00
Count 2 1 0 0 0
% within
GradeLeve
l
50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
TopResour
ce
6.5% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 2.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3.00 Count 9 3 1 0 6
% within
GradeLeve
l
42.9% 14.3% 4.8% 0.0% 28.6%
% within
TopResour
ce
29.0% 37.5% 33.3% 0.0% 46.2%
% of Total 12.3% 4.1% 1.4% 0.0% 8.2%
4.00
Count 19 3 2 2 6
% within
GradeLeve
l
43.2% 6.8% 4.5% 4.5% 13.6%
% within
TopResour
ce
61.3% 37.5% 66.7% 100.0% 46.2%
% of Total 26.0% 4.1% 2.7% 2.7% 8.2%
Total
Count 31 8 3 2 13
% within
GradeLeve
l
42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8%
% within
TopResour
ce
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8%
Concentration * TopResource
Crosstab
TopResource
1.00 2.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Conce
ntration
1.00 Count 10 3 0 0 2
% within
Concentrat
ion
58.8% 17.6% 0.0% 0.0% 11.8%
% within
TopResou
rce
32.3% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 15.4%
% of Total 13.7% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
2.00
Count 2 1 1 0 1
% within
Concentrat
ion
40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0%
% within
TopResou
rce
6.5% 12.5% 33.3% 0.0% 7.7%
% of Total 2.7% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4%
3.00
Count 1 0 0 0 0
% within
Concentrat
ion
50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
TopResou
rce
3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.00
Count 3 1 0 1 5
% within
Concentrat
ion
27.3% 9.1% 0.0% 9.1% 45.5%
% within
TopResou
rce
9.7% 12.5% 0.0% 50.0% 38.5%
% of Total 4.1% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 6.8%
5.00 Count 8 2 0 0 2
% within
Concentrat
ion
53.3% 13.3% 0.0% 0.0% 13.3%
% within
TopResou
rce
25.8% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.4%
% of Total 11.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
6.00
Count 7 1 2 1 3
% within
Concentrat
ion
30.4% 4.3% 8.7% 4.3% 13.0%
% within
TopResou
rce
22.6% 12.5% 66.7% 50.0% 23.1%
% of Total 9.6% 1.4% 2.7% 1.4% 4.1%
Total
Count 31 8 3 2 13
% within
Concentrat
ion
42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8%
% within
TopResou
rce
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8%
Gender * TopicsForInformation
Crosstab
TopicsForInformation
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Gender 1.00 Count 7 3 12 6 5
% within
Gender
21.2% 9.1% 36.4% 18.2% 15.2%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
50.0% 25.0% 52.2% 60.0% 38.5%
% of Total 9.6% 4.1% 16.4% 8.2% 6.8%
2.00
Count 7 9 11 4 8
% within
Gender
17.5% 22.5% 27.5% 10.0% 20.0%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
50.0% 75.0% 47.8% 40.0% 61.5%
% of Total 9.6% 12.3% 15.1% 5.5% 11.0%
Total
Count 14 12 23 10 13
% within
Gender
19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8%
GradeLevel * TopicsForInformation
Crosstab
TopicsForInformation
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
GradeL
evel
1.00
Count 1 0 1 1 0
% within
GradeLev
el
25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
7.1% 0.0% 4.3% 10.0% 0.0%
% of Total 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0%
2.00 Count 1 1 1 0 1
% within
GradeLev
el
25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
7.1% 8.3% 4.3% 0.0% 7.7%
% of Total 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4%
3.00
Count 4 3 7 2 5
% within
GradeLev
el
19.0% 14.3% 33.3% 9.5% 23.8%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
28.6% 25.0% 30.4% 20.0% 38.5%
% of Total 5.5% 4.1% 9.6% 2.7% 6.8%
4.00
Count 8 8 14 7 7
% within
GradeLev
el
18.2% 18.2% 31.8% 15.9% 15.9%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
57.1% 66.7% 60.9% 70.0% 53.8%
% of Total 11.0% 11.0% 19.2% 9.6% 9.6%
Total
Count 14 12 23 10 13
% within
GradeLev
el
19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8%
Concentration * TopicsForInformation
Crosstab
TopicsForInformation
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Conce
ntratio
n
1.00
Count 3 1 6 4 3
% within
Concentra
tion
17.6% 5.9% 35.3% 23.5% 17.6%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
21.4% 8.3% 26.1% 40.0% 23.1%
% of Total 4.1% 1.4% 8.2% 5.5% 4.1%
2.00
Count 2 2 1 0 0
% within
Concentra
tion
40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
14.3% 16.7% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 2.7% 2.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0%
3.00
Count 0 2 0 0 0
% within
Concentra
tion
0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.00 Count 2 3 5 0 1
% within
Concentra
tion
18.2% 27.3% 45.5% 0.0% 9.1%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
14.3% 25.0% 21.7% 0.0% 7.7%
% of Total 2.7% 4.1% 6.8% 0.0% 1.4%
5.00
Count 4 1 2 2 6
% within
Concentra
tion
26.7% 6.7% 13.3% 13.3% 40.0%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
28.6% 8.3% 8.7% 20.0% 46.2%
% of Total 5.5% 1.4% 2.7% 2.7% 8.2%
6.00
Count 3 3 9 4 3
% within
Concentra
tion
13.0% 13.0% 39.1% 17.4% 13.0%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
21.4% 25.0% 39.1% 40.0% 23.1%
% of Total 4.1% 4.1% 12.3% 5.5% 4.1%
Total
Count 14 12 23 10 13
% within
Concentra
tion
19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8%
% within
TopicsForI
nformation
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8%
Gender * UseMihayloServices
Crosstab
UseMihayl
oServices
Total
1.00 2.00
Gender 1.00 Count 28 5 33
% within
Gender
84.8% 15.2% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
46.7% 38.5% 45.2%
% of Total 38.4% 6.8% 45.2%
2.00
Count 32 8 40
% within
Gender
80.0% 20.0% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
53.3% 61.5% 54.8%
% of Total 43.8% 11.0% 54.8%
Total
Count 60 13 73
% within
Gender
82.2% 17.8% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 82.2% 17.8% 100.0%
GradeLevel * UseMihayloServices
Crosstab
UseMihayl
oServices
Total
1.00 2.00
GradeL
evel
1.00 Count 2 2 4
% within
GradeLeve
l
50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
3.3% 15.4% 5.5%
% of Total 2.7% 2.7% 5.5%
2.00
Count 2 2 4
% within
GradeLeve
l
50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
3.3% 15.4% 5.5%
% of Total 2.7% 2.7% 5.5%
3.00
Count 18 3 21
% within
GradeLeve
l
85.7% 14.3% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
30.0% 23.1% 28.8%
% of Total 24.7% 4.1% 28.8%
4.00
Count 38 6 44
% within
GradeLeve
l
86.4% 13.6% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
63.3% 46.2% 60.3%
% of Total 52.1% 8.2% 60.3%
Total Count 60 13 73
% within
GradeLeve
l
82.2% 17.8% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 82.2% 17.8% 100.0%
Concentration * UseMihayloServices
Crosstab
UseMihayl
oServices
Total
1.00 2.00
Concen
tration
1.00
Count 15 2 17
% within
Concentrat
ion
88.2% 11.8% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
25.0% 15.4% 23.3%
% of Total 20.5% 2.7% 23.3%
2.00
Count 5 0 5
% within
Concentrat
ion
100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
8.3% 0.0% 6.8%
% of Total 6.8% 0.0% 6.8%
3.00
Count 2 0 2
% within
Concentrat
ion
100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
3.3% 0.0% 2.7%
% of Total 2.7% 0.0% 2.7%
4.00
Count 11 0 11
% within
Concentrat
ion
100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
18.3% 0.0% 15.1%
% of Total 15.1% 0.0% 15.1%
5.00
Count 10 5 15
% within
Concentrat
ion
66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
16.7% 38.5% 20.5%
% of Total 13.7% 6.8% 20.5%
6.00
Count 17 6 23
% within
Concentrat
ion
73.9% 26.1% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
28.3% 46.2% 31.5%
% of Total 23.3% 8.2% 31.5%
Total Count 60 13 73
% within
Concentrat
ion
82.2% 17.8% 100.0%
% within
UseMihayl
oServices
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 82.2% 17.8% 100.0%
Gender * MostOftenServices
Crosstab
MostOftenServices
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Gender
1.00
Count 4 6 1 1 1
% within
Gender
12.1% 18.2% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
% within
MostOften
Services
66.7% 54.5% 20.0% 33.3% 33.3%
% of Total 5.5% 8.2% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4%
2.00
Count 2 5 4 2 2
% within
Gender
5.0% 12.5% 10.0% 5.0% 5.0%
% within
MostOften
Services
33.3% 45.5% 80.0% 66.7% 66.7%
% of Total 2.7% 6.8% 5.5% 2.7% 2.7%
Total
Count 6 11 5 3 3
% within
Gender
8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1%
% within
MostOften
Services
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1%
GradeLevel * MostOftenServices
Crosstab
MostOftenServices
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
GradeL
evel
1.00
Count 0 1 1 0 0
% within
GradeLev
el
0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
MostOften
Services
0.0% 9.1% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0%
2.00
Count 0 0 0 0 1
% within
GradeLev
el
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%
% within
MostOften
Services
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4%
3.00
Count 2 5 1 0 1
% within
GradeLev
el
9.5% 23.8% 4.8% 0.0% 4.8%
% within
MostOften
Services
33.3% 45.5% 20.0% 0.0% 33.3%
% of Total 2.7% 6.8% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4%
4.00 Count 4 5 3 3 1
% within
GradeLev
el
9.1% 11.4% 6.8% 6.8% 2.3%
% within
MostOften
Services
66.7% 45.5% 60.0% 100.0% 33.3%
% of Total 5.5% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1% 1.4%
Total
Count 6 11 5 3 3
% within
GradeLev
el
8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1%
% within
MostOften
Services
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1%
Concentration * MostOftenServices
Crosstab
MostOftenServices
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Conce
ntratio
n
1.00
Count 1 4 0 0 1
% within
Concentra
tion
5.9% 23.5% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9%
% within
MostOften
Services
16.7% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3%
% of Total 1.4% 5.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4%
2.00
Count 0 1 1 0 0
% within
Concentra
tion
0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
MostOften
Services
0.0% 9.1% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0%
3.00 Count 0 0 0 0 0
% within
Concentra
tion
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
MostOften
Services
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.00
Count 0 1 2 0 1
% within
Concentra
tion
0.0% 9.1% 18.2% 0.0% 9.1%
% within
MostOften
Services
0.0% 9.1% 40.0% 0.0% 33.3%
% of Total 0.0% 1.4% 2.7% 0.0% 1.4%
5.00
Count 1 0 2 1 1
% within
Concentra
tion
6.7% 0.0% 13.3% 6.7% 6.7%
% within
MostOften
Services
16.7% 0.0% 40.0% 33.3% 33.3%
% of Total 1.4% 0.0% 2.7% 1.4% 1.4%
6.00
Count 4 5 0 2 0
% within
Concentra
tion
17.4% 21.7% 0.0% 8.7% 0.0%
% within
MostOften
Services
66.7% 45.5% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
% of Total 5.5% 6.8% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0%
Total Count 6 11 5 3 3
% within
Concentra
tion
8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1%
% within
MostOften
Services
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1%
Gender * WebsiteVisits
Crosstab
WebsiteVi
sits
Total
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
Gender
1.00
Count 10 20 1 2 33
% within
Gender
30.3% 60.6% 3.0% 6.1% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
43.5% 47.6% 20.0% 66.7% 45.2%
% of Total 13.7% 27.4% 1.4% 2.7% 45.2%
2.00
Count 13 22 4 1 40
% within
Gender
32.5% 55.0% 10.0% 2.5% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
56.5% 52.4% 80.0% 33.3% 54.8%
% of Total 17.8% 30.1% 5.5% 1.4% 54.8%
Total Count 23 42 5 3 73
% within
Gender
31.5% 57.5% 6.8% 4.1% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 31.5% 57.5% 6.8% 4.1% 100.0%
Concentration * WebsiteVisits
Crosstab
WebsiteVi
sits
Total
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
Conce
ntration
1.00
Count 6 8 3 0 17
% within
Concentrat
ion
35.3% 47.1% 17.6% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
26.1% 19.0% 60.0% 0.0% 23.3%
% of Total 8.2% 11.0% 4.1% 0.0% 23.3%
2.00
Count 1 2 0 2 5
% within
Concentrat
ion
20.0% 40.0% 0.0% 40.0% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
4.3% 4.8% 0.0% 66.7% 6.8%
% of Total 1.4% 2.7% 0.0% 2.7% 6.8%
3.00
Count 0 1 0 1 2
% within
Concentrat
ion
0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 33.3% 2.7%
% of Total 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 2.7%
4.00
Count 2 7 2 0 11
% within
Concentrat
ion
18.2% 63.6% 18.2% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
8.7% 16.7% 40.0% 0.0% 15.1%
% of Total 2.7% 9.6% 2.7% 0.0% 15.1%
5.00
Count 5 10 0 0 15
% within
Concentrat
ion
33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
21.7% 23.8% 0.0% 0.0% 20.5%
% of Total 6.8% 13.7% 0.0% 0.0% 20.5%
6.00
Count 9 14 0 0 23
% within
Concentrat
ion
39.1% 60.9% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
39.1% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 31.5%
% of Total 12.3% 19.2% 0.0% 0.0% 31.5%
Total Count 23 42 5 3 73
% within
Concentrat
ion
31.5% 57.5% 6.8% 4.1% 100.0%
% within
WebsiteVi
sits
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 31.5% 57.5% 6.8% 4.1% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson
Chi-
Square
39.594 15 .001
Likelihood
Ratio
27.387 15 .026
Linear-by-
Linear
Associatio
n
3.348 1 .067
N of Valid
Cases
73
Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std.
Error
Approx. T Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval
Pearson's
R
-.216 .106 -1.861 .067
Ordinal by Ordinal
Spearman
Correlation
-.195 .116 -1.679 .097
N of Valid
Cases
73
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Gender GradeLevel Concentration BY WhyVisitWebsite
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CORR
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.
Crosstabs
Notes
Output Created 01-MAY-2013 15:45:24
Comments
Input
Data
C:Usersuser1DesktopMi
haylo SPSS.sav
Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 73
Missing Value Handling
Definition of Missing
User-defined missing
values are treated as
missing.
Cases Used
Statistics for each table
are based on all the cases
with valid data in the
specified range(s) for all
variables in each table.
Syntax
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Gender GradeLevel Concentration BY
WhyVisitWebsite
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CORR
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.
Resources
Processor Time 00:00:00.03
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 131029
[DataSet1] C:Usersuser1DesktopMihaylo SPSS.sav
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Gender *
WhyVisitW
ebsite
73 100.0% 0 0.0% 73 100.0%
GradeLeve
l *
WhyVisitW
ebsite
73 100.0% 0 0.0% 73 100.0%
Concentrat
ion *
WhyVisitW
ebsite
73 100.0% 0 0.0% 73 100.0%
Gender * WhyVisitWebsite
Crosstab
WhyVisitWebsite
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Gender
1.00
Count 10 2 3 7 3
% within
Gender
30.3% 6.1% 9.1% 21.2% 9.1%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
37.0% 25.0% 60.0% 58.3% 50.0%
% of Total 13.7% 2.7% 4.1% 9.6% 4.1%
2.00
Count 17 6 2 5 3
% within
Gender
42.5% 15.0% 5.0% 12.5% 7.5%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
63.0% 75.0% 40.0% 41.7% 50.0%
% of Total 23.3% 8.2% 2.7% 6.8% 4.1%
Total
Count 27 8 5 12 6
% within
Gender
37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4% 8.2%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4% 8.2%
GradeLevel * WhyVisitWebsite
Crosstab
WhyVisitWebsite
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
GradeL
evel
1.00 Count 2 0 0 0 0
% within
GradeLev
el
50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
7.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2.00
Count 2 1 0 1 0
% within
GradeLev
el
50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
7.4% 12.5% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0%
% of Total 2.7% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0%
3.00
Count 6 1 1 6 3
% within
GradeLev
el
28.6% 4.8% 4.8% 28.6% 14.3%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
22.2% 12.5% 20.0% 50.0% 50.0%
% of Total 8.2% 1.4% 1.4% 8.2% 4.1%
4.00
Count 17 6 4 5 3
% within
GradeLev
el
38.6% 13.6% 9.1% 11.4% 6.8%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
63.0% 75.0% 80.0% 41.7% 50.0%
% of Total 23.3% 8.2% 5.5% 6.8% 4.1%
Total Count 27 8 5 12 6
% within
GradeLev
el
37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4% 8.2%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4% 8.2%
Concentration * WhyVisitWebsite
Crosstab
WhyVisitWebsite
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
Concen
tration
1.00
Count 5 4 1 2
% within
Concentrat
ion
29.4% 23.5% 5.9% 11.8%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
18.5% 50.0% 20.0% 16.7%
% of Total 6.8% 5.5% 1.4% 2.7%
2.00
Count 2 0 0 2
% within
Concentrat
ion
40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
7.4% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7%
% of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
3.00 Count 1 0 0 1
% within
Concentrat
ion
50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3%
% of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4%
4.00
Count 5 2 0 1
% within
Concentrat
ion
45.5% 18.2% 0.0% 9.1%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
18.5% 25.0% 0.0% 8.3%
% of Total 6.8% 2.7% 0.0% 1.4%
5.00
Count 5 2 1 3
% within
Concentrat
ion
33.3% 13.3% 6.7% 20.0%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
18.5% 25.0% 20.0% 25.0%
% of Total 6.8% 2.7% 1.4% 4.1%
6.00
Count 9 0 3 3
% within
Concentrat
ion
39.1% 0.0% 13.0% 13.0%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
33.3% 0.0% 60.0% 25.0%
% of Total 12.3% 0.0% 4.1% 4.1%
Total
Count 27 8 5 12
% within
Concentrat
ion
37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4%
% within
WhyVisitW
ebsite
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4%
Gender * MihayloImprovements
Crosstab
MihayloImprovements
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Gender
1.00
Count 12 5 3 0 7
% within
Gender
36.4% 15.2% 9.1% 0.0% 21.2%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
60.0% 50.0% 27.3% 0.0% 36.8%
% of Total 16.4% 6.8% 4.1% 0.0% 9.6%
2.00
Count 8 5 8 3 12
% within
Gender
20.0% 12.5% 20.0% 7.5% 30.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
40.0% 50.0% 72.7% 100.0% 63.2%
% of Total 11.0% 6.8% 11.0% 4.1% 16.4%
Total
Count 20 10 11 3 19
% within
Gender
27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0%
GradeLevel * MihayloImprovements
Crosstab
MihayloImprovements
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
GradeL
evel
1.00
Count 1 0 0 1 2
% within
GradeLev
el
25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 10.5%
% of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 2.7%
2.00
Count 2 1 0 0 1
% within
GradeLev
el
50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3%
% of Total 2.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4%
3.00
Count 5 2 4 0 4
% within
GradeLev
el
23.8% 9.5% 19.0% 0.0% 19.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
25.0% 20.0% 36.4% 0.0% 21.1%
% of Total 6.8% 2.7% 5.5% 0.0% 5.5%
4.00 Count 12 7 7 2 12
% within
GradeLev
el
27.3% 15.9% 15.9% 4.5% 27.3%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
60.0% 70.0% 63.6% 66.7% 63.2%
% of Total 16.4% 9.6% 9.6% 2.7% 16.4%
Total
Count 20 10 11 3 19
% within
GradeLev
el
27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0%
Concentration * MihayloImprovements
Crosstab
MihayloImprovements
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Conce
ntratio
n
1.00
Count 5 2 1 1 4
% within
Concentra
tion
29.4% 11.8% 5.9% 5.9% 23.5%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
25.0% 20.0% 9.1% 33.3% 21.1%
% of Total 6.8% 2.7% 1.4% 1.4% 5.5%
2.00 Count 2 0 2 0 0
% within
Concentra
tion
40.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
10.0% 0.0% 18.2% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 2.7% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0%
3.00
Count 1 0 0 0 1
% within
Concentra
tion
50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3%
% of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4%
4.00
Count 3 2 3 1 2
% within
Concentra
tion
27.3% 18.2% 27.3% 9.1% 18.2%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
15.0% 20.0% 27.3% 33.3% 10.5%
% of Total 4.1% 2.7% 4.1% 1.4% 2.7%
5.00 Count 6 1 1 1 3
% within
Concentra
tion
40.0% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 20.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
30.0% 10.0% 9.1% 33.3% 15.8%
% of Total 8.2% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 4.1%
6.00
Count 3 5 4 0 9
% within
Concentra
tion
13.0% 21.7% 17.4% 0.0% 39.1%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
15.0% 50.0% 36.4% 0.0% 47.4%
% of Total 4.1% 6.8% 5.5% 0.0% 12.3%
Total
Count 20 10 11 3 19
% within
Concentra
tion
27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0%
% within
MihayloIm
provement
s
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0%
Gender * PerceptionofWebsite
Crosstab
PerceptionofWebsite
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Gender
1.00
Count 13 5 5 7 3
% within
Gender
39.4% 15.2% 15.2% 21.2% 9.1%
% within
Perception
ofWebsite
38.2% 50.0% 41.7% 77.8% 50.0%
% of Total 17.8% 6.8% 6.8% 9.6% 4.1%
2.00 Count 21 5 7 2 3
% within
Gender
52.5% 12.5% 17.5% 5.0% 7.5%
% within
Perception
ofWebsite
61.8% 50.0% 58.3% 22.2% 50.0%
% of Total 28.8% 6.8% 9.6% 2.7% 4.1%
Total
Count 34 10 12 9 6
% within
Gender
46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2%
% within
Perception
ofWebsite
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2%
GradeLevel * PerceptionofWebsite
Crosstab
PerceptionofWebsite
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
GradeL
evel
1.00
Count 2 2 0 0 0
% within
GradeLev
el
50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
Perception
ofWebsite
5.9% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 2.7% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2.00 Count 2 0 1 0 1
% within
GradeLev
el
50.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0%
% within
Perception
ofWebsite
5.9% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 16.7%
% of Total 2.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4%
3.00
Count 6 5 6 1 2
% within
GradeLev
el
28.6% 23.8% 28.6% 4.8% 9.5%
% within
Perception
ofWebsite
17.6% 50.0% 50.0% 11.1% 33.3%
% of Total 8.2% 6.8% 8.2% 1.4% 2.7%
4.00
Count 24 3 5 8 3
% within
GradeLev
el
54.5% 6.8% 11.4% 18.2% 6.8%
% within
Perception
ofWebsite
70.6% 30.0% 41.7% 88.9% 50.0%
% of Total 32.9% 4.1% 6.8% 11.0% 4.1%
Total
Count 34 10 12 9 6
% within
GradeLev
el
46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2%
% within
Perception
ofWebsite
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2%
Concentration * PerceptionofWebsite
Crosstab
PerceptionofWebsite
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Conce
ntratio
n
1.00
Count 7 4 2 1 2
% within
Concentra
tion
41.2% 23.5% 11.8% 5.9% 11.8%
% within
Perceptio
nofWebsit
e
20.6% 40.0% 16.7% 11.1% 33.3%
% of Total 9.6% 5.5% 2.7% 1.4% 2.7%
2.00
Count 3 0 2 0 0
% within
Concentra
tion
60.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
Perceptio
nofWebsit
e
8.8% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 4.1% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0%
3.00
Count 2 0 0 0 0
% within
Concentra
tion
100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% within
Perceptio
nofWebsit
e
5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.00 Count 5 1 2 3 0
% within
Concentra
tion
45.5% 9.1% 18.2% 27.3% 0.0%
% within
Perceptio
nofWebsit
e
14.7% 10.0% 16.7% 33.3% 0.0%
% of Total 6.8% 1.4% 2.7% 4.1% 0.0%
5.00
Count 7 2 3 1 2
% within
Concentra
tion
46.7% 13.3% 20.0% 6.7% 13.3%
% within
Perceptio
nofWebsit
e
20.6% 20.0% 25.0% 11.1% 33.3%
% of Total 9.6% 2.7% 4.1% 1.4% 2.7%
6.00
Count 10 3 3 4 2
% within
Concentra
tion
43.5% 13.0% 13.0% 17.4% 8.7%
% within
Perceptio
nofWebsit
e
29.4% 30.0% 25.0% 44.4% 33.3%
% of Total 13.7% 4.1% 4.1% 5.5% 2.7%
Total
Count 34 10 12 9 6
% within
Concentra
tion
46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2%
% within
Perceptio
nofWebsit
e
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2%
Gender * ScaleOfCommunication
Crosstab
ScaleOfCommunication
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Gender
1.00
Count 5 3 14 10 1
% within
Gender
15.2% 9.1% 42.4% 30.3% 3.0%
% within
ScaleOfCo
mmunicati
on
50.0% 75.0% 45.2% 43.5% 20.0%
% of Total 6.8% 4.1% 19.2% 13.7% 1.4%
2.00
Count 5 1 17 13 4
% within
Gender
12.5% 2.5% 42.5% 32.5% 10.0%
% within
ScaleOfCo
mmunicati
on
50.0% 25.0% 54.8% 56.5% 80.0%
% of Total 6.8% 1.4% 23.3% 17.8% 5.5%
Total
Count 10 4 31 23 5
% within
Gender
13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8%
% within
ScaleOfCo
mmunicati
on
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8%
GradeLevel * ScaleOfCommunication
Crosstab
ScaleOfCommunication
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
GradeL
evel
1.00
Count 2 0 0 2 0
% within
GradeLev
el
50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
% within
ScaleOfCo
mmunicati
on
20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.7% 0.0%
% of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0%
2.00
Count 1 0 0 2 1
% within
GradeLev
el
25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0%
% within
ScaleOfCo
mmunicati
on
10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.7% 20.0%
% of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 1.4%
3.00
Count 1 1 7 10 2
% within
GradeLev
el
4.8% 4.8% 33.3% 47.6% 9.5%
% within
ScaleOfCo
mmunicati
on
10.0% 25.0% 22.6% 43.5% 40.0%
% of Total 1.4% 1.4% 9.6% 13.7% 2.7%
4.00 Count 6 3 24 9 2
% within
GradeLev
el
13.6% 6.8% 54.5% 20.5% 4.5%
% within
ScaleOfCo
mmunicati
on
60.0% 75.0% 77.4% 39.1% 40.0%
% of Total 8.2% 4.1% 32.9% 12.3% 2.7%
Total
Count 10 4 31 23 5
% within
GradeLev
el
13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8%
% within
ScaleOfCo
mmunicati
on
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8%
Concentration * ScaleOfCommunication
Crosstab
ScaleOfCommunication
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Conce
ntratio
n
1.00
Count 2 1 6 6 2
% within
Concentra
tion
11.8% 5.9% 35.3% 35.3% 11.8%
% within
ScaleOfC
ommunica
tion
20.0% 25.0% 19.4% 26.1% 40.0%
% of Total 2.7% 1.4% 8.2% 8.2% 2.7%
2.00 Count 0 0 1 3 1
% within
Concentra
tion
0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 20.0%
% within
ScaleOfC
ommunica
tion
0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 13.0% 20.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 4.1% 1.4%
3.00
Count 0 0 1 1 0
% within
Concentra
tion
0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
% within
ScaleOfC
ommunica
tion
0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 4.3% 0.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0%
4.00
Count 0 1 6 3 1
% within
Concentra
tion
0.0% 9.1% 54.5% 27.3% 9.1%
% within
ScaleOfC
ommunica
tion
0.0% 25.0% 19.4% 13.0% 20.0%
% of Total 0.0% 1.4% 8.2% 4.1% 1.4%
5.00 Count 2 1 4 7 1
% within
Concentra
tion
13.3% 6.7% 26.7% 46.7% 6.7%
% within
ScaleOfC
ommunica
tion
20.0% 25.0% 12.9% 30.4% 20.0%
% of Total 2.7% 1.4% 5.5% 9.6% 1.4%
6.00
Count 6 1 13 3 0
% within
Concentra
tion
26.1% 4.3% 56.5% 13.0% 0.0%
% within
ScaleOfC
ommunica
tion
60.0% 25.0% 41.9% 13.0% 0.0%
% of Total 8.2% 1.4% 17.8% 4.1% 0.0%
Total
Count 10 4 31 23 5
% within
Concentra
tion
13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8%
% within
ScaleOfC
ommunica
tion
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8%

Más contenido relacionado

Destacado (17)

Weymouth steel
Weymouth steelWeymouth steel
Weymouth steel
 
Clip pers project
Clip pers projectClip pers project
Clip pers project
 
Dermavescent copy
Dermavescent copyDermavescent copy
Dermavescent copy
 
Lancer gallery case study copy
Lancer gallery case study copyLancer gallery case study copy
Lancer gallery case study copy
 
Dermavescent Laboratories
Dermavescent LaboratoriesDermavescent Laboratories
Dermavescent Laboratories
 
Croft
CroftCroft
Croft
 
Pmh
Pmh Pmh
Pmh
 
Communispace case study copy
Communispace case study copyCommunispace case study copy
Communispace case study copy
 
marketing plan (4)
marketing plan (4)marketing plan (4)
marketing plan (4)
 
Haverwood furniture
Haverwood furnitureHaverwood furniture
Haverwood furniture
 
Mary kay case
Mary kay caseMary kay case
Mary kay case
 
Hillcrest case study copy
Hillcrest case study copyHillcrest case study copy
Hillcrest case study copy
 
X4 case study copy
X4 case study copyX4 case study copy
X4 case study copy
 
X 5 case copy
X 5 case copyX 5 case copy
X 5 case copy
 
Carnival cruise report copy
Carnival cruise report copyCarnival cruise report copy
Carnival cruise report copy
 
Report
ReportReport
Report
 
Student P
Student PStudent P
Student P
 

Similar a Cross tabulation for survey

Jdp presentation statistics
Jdp presentation statisticsJdp presentation statistics
Jdp presentation statisticsDevcoms
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)20slab(대학내일20대연구소)
 
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...Digithead
 
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...Digithead
 
RESULTADOS DE LA ECE 2018-SEGUNDO GRADO DE SECUNDARIA-GENERAL
RESULTADOS DE LA ECE 2018-SEGUNDO GRADO DE SECUNDARIA-GENERALRESULTADOS DE LA ECE 2018-SEGUNDO GRADO DE SECUNDARIA-GENERAL
RESULTADOS DE LA ECE 2018-SEGUNDO GRADO DE SECUNDARIA-GENERALEugenio Marlon Evaristo Borja
 
Survey on The Internet of Things and Social Media
Survey on The Internet of Things and Social MediaSurvey on The Internet of Things and Social Media
Survey on The Internet of Things and Social Mediagrins1
 
Israel’s Economic Highlights Presentation, Q4 2011
Israel’s Economic Highlights Presentation, Q4 2011Israel’s Economic Highlights Presentation, Q4 2011
Israel’s Economic Highlights Presentation, Q4 2011Assaf Luxembourg
 
Analytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to PredictiveAnalytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to PredictiveCasey Iannone
 
NEMLDC SALT Data 2021
NEMLDC SALT Data 2021NEMLDC SALT Data 2021
NEMLDC SALT Data 2021SamuelDCalder
 
Crosstabs.docx
Crosstabs.docxCrosstabs.docx
Crosstabs.docxdevi Narti
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)20slab(대학내일20대연구소)
 
NIPS2010: high-dimensional statistics: prediction, association and causal inf...
NIPS2010: high-dimensional statistics: prediction, association and causal inf...NIPS2010: high-dimensional statistics: prediction, association and causal inf...
NIPS2010: high-dimensional statistics: prediction, association and causal inf...zukun
 

Similar a Cross tabulation for survey (20)

Matematicas Financieras: Tablas de tasas factores financieros (2020)
Matematicas Financieras: Tablas de tasas factores financieros (2020)Matematicas Financieras: Tablas de tasas factores financieros (2020)
Matematicas Financieras: Tablas de tasas factores financieros (2020)
 
Correlation and volatility DJ EuroStoxx50 Oct 2014
Correlation and volatility DJ EuroStoxx50 Oct 2014Correlation and volatility DJ EuroStoxx50 Oct 2014
Correlation and volatility DJ EuroStoxx50 Oct 2014
 
Eff Set2 Assets
Eff Set2 AssetsEff Set2 Assets
Eff Set2 Assets
 
Jdp presentation statistics
Jdp presentation statisticsJdp presentation statistics
Jdp presentation statistics
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
 
Tax Free Yields
Tax Free YieldsTax Free Yields
Tax Free Yields
 
Lampiran
LampiranLampiran
Lampiran
 
S. stone e health business models for chronic conditions-experiences of basqu...
S. stone e health business models for chronic conditions-experiences of basqu...S. stone e health business models for chronic conditions-experiences of basqu...
S. stone e health business models for chronic conditions-experiences of basqu...
 
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
 
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
1) 1999, 2001, and 2008 CIRP Frequency Distribution Trend Results of CMU Resp...
 
RESULTADOS DE LA ECE 2018-SEGUNDO GRADO DE SECUNDARIA-GENERAL
RESULTADOS DE LA ECE 2018-SEGUNDO GRADO DE SECUNDARIA-GENERALRESULTADOS DE LA ECE 2018-SEGUNDO GRADO DE SECUNDARIA-GENERAL
RESULTADOS DE LA ECE 2018-SEGUNDO GRADO DE SECUNDARIA-GENERAL
 
Survey on The Internet of Things and Social Media
Survey on The Internet of Things and Social MediaSurvey on The Internet of Things and Social Media
Survey on The Internet of Things and Social Media
 
Israel’s Economic Highlights Presentation, Q4 2011
Israel’s Economic Highlights Presentation, Q4 2011Israel’s Economic Highlights Presentation, Q4 2011
Israel’s Economic Highlights Presentation, Q4 2011
 
Analytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to PredictiveAnalytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to Predictive
 
NEMLDC SALT Data 2021
NEMLDC SALT Data 2021NEMLDC SALT Data 2021
NEMLDC SALT Data 2021
 
Students Reporting Use of Selected Substances in the Last 30 Days
Students Reporting Use of Selected Substances in the Last 30 Days Students Reporting Use of Selected Substances in the Last 30 Days
Students Reporting Use of Selected Substances in the Last 30 Days
 
Crosstabs.docx
Crosstabs.docxCrosstabs.docx
Crosstabs.docx
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)
 
HR analytics report
HR analytics reportHR analytics report
HR analytics report
 
NIPS2010: high-dimensional statistics: prediction, association and causal inf...
NIPS2010: high-dimensional statistics: prediction, association and causal inf...NIPS2010: high-dimensional statistics: prediction, association and causal inf...
NIPS2010: high-dimensional statistics: prediction, association and causal inf...
 

Más de kimberlybak88

Más de kimberlybak88 (11)

Jimmi’s marketing efforts
Jimmi’s marketing effortsJimmi’s marketing efforts
Jimmi’s marketing efforts
 
city presentation
city presentationcity presentation
city presentation
 
Final
FinalFinal
Final
 
Clippers Presentation
Clippers PresentationClippers Presentation
Clippers Presentation
 
Dermavescent Laboratories
Dermavescent LaboratoriesDermavescent Laboratories
Dermavescent Laboratories
 
Final carnival
Final carnivalFinal carnival
Final carnival
 
I pad powerpoint
I pad powerpointI pad powerpoint
I pad powerpoint
 
Jimmi's bar
Jimmi's bar Jimmi's bar
Jimmi's bar
 
presentation (6)
presentation (6)presentation (6)
presentation (6)
 
diary project
diary projectdiary project
diary project
 
Final verision
Final verisionFinal verision
Final verision
 

Último

Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)Zilliz
 
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin WoodPolkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin WoodJuan lago vázquez
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobeapidays
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businesspanagenda
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDropbox
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMESafe Software
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWERMadyBayot
 
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​Bhuvaneswari Subramani
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMESafe Software
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfOrbitshub
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Jeffrey Haguewood
 
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...Orbitshub
 
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityPlatformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityWSO2
 
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxRustici Software
 
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...Zilliz
 
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptxVector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptxRemote DBA Services
 
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ..."I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...Zilliz
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsNanddeep Nachan
 

Último (20)

Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
 
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin WoodPolkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
 
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
 
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityPlatformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
 
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
 
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptxVector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
 
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ..."I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
 

Cross tabulation for survey

  • 1. Crosstabs Gender * BackgroundImage Crosstabulation Background Image Total 1.00 2.00 6.00 Gender 1.00 Count 22 6 5 33 % within Gender 66.7% 18.2% 15.2% 100.0% % within Background Image 44.0% 46.2% 50.0% 45.2% % of Total 30.1% 8.2% 6.8% 45.2% 2.00 Count 28 7 5 40 % within Gender 70.0% 17.5% 12.5% 100.0% % within Background Image 56.0% 53.8% 50.0% 54.8% % of Total 38.4% 9.6% 6.8% 54.8% Total Count 50 13 10 73 % within Gender 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% % within Background Image 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% GradeLevel * BackgroundImage Crosstabulation Backgroun dImage Total 1.00 2.00 6.00
  • 2. GradeL evel 1.00 Count 1 1 2 4 % within GradeLeve l 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 2.0% 7.7% 20.0% 5.5% % of Total 1.4% 1.4% 2.7% 5.5% 2.00 Count 3 0 1 4 % within GradeLeve l 75.0% 0.0% 25.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 6.0% 0.0% 10.0% 5.5% % of Total 4.1% 0.0% 1.4% 5.5% 3.00 Count 15 1 5 21 % within GradeLeve l 71.4% 4.8% 23.8% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 30.0% 7.7% 50.0% 28.8% % of Total 20.5% 1.4% 6.8% 28.8% 4.00 Count 31 11 2 44 % within GradeLeve l 70.5% 25.0% 4.5% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 62.0% 84.6% 20.0% 60.3% % of Total 42.5% 15.1% 2.7% 60.3%
  • 3. Total Count 50 13 10 73 % within GradeLeve l 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% Concentration * BackgroundImage Crosstabulation Backgroun dImage Total 1.00 2.00 6.00 Concen tration 1.00 Count 12 3 2 17 % within Concentrat ion 70.6% 17.6% 11.8% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 24.0% 23.1% 20.0% 23.3% % of Total 16.4% 4.1% 2.7% 23.3% 2.00 Count 5 0 0 5 % within Concentrat ion 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8% % of Total 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8% 3.00 Count 2 0 0 2
  • 4. % within Concentrat ion 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% % of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 4.00 Count 5 5 1 11 % within Concentrat ion 45.5% 45.5% 9.1% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 10.0% 38.5% 10.0% 15.1% % of Total 6.8% 6.8% 1.4% 15.1% 5.00 Count 9 2 4 15 % within Concentrat ion 60.0% 13.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 18.0% 15.4% 40.0% 20.5% % of Total 12.3% 2.7% 5.5% 20.5% 6.00 Count 17 3 3 23 % within Concentrat ion 73.9% 13.0% 13.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 34.0% 23.1% 30.0% 31.5% % of Total 23.3% 4.1% 4.1% 31.5% Total Count 50 13 10 73
  • 5. % within Concentrat ion 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% Gender * BackgroundImage Crosstab Backgroun dImage Total 1.00 2.00 6.00 Gender 1.00 Count 22 6 5 33 % within Gender 66.7% 18.2% 15.2% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 44.0% 46.2% 50.0% 45.2% % of Total 30.1% 8.2% 6.8% 45.2% 2.00 Count 28 7 5 40 % within Gender 70.0% 17.5% 12.5% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 56.0% 53.8% 50.0% 54.8% % of Total 38.4% 9.6% 6.8% 54.8% Total Count 50 13 10 73 % within Gender 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0%
  • 6. % within Backgroun dImage 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% GradeLevel * BackgroundImage Crosstab Backgroun dImage Total 1.00 2.00 6.00 GradeL evel 1.00 Count 1 1 2 4 % within GradeLeve l 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 2.0% 7.7% 20.0% 5.5% % of Total 1.4% 1.4% 2.7% 5.5% 2.00 Count 3 0 1 4 % within GradeLeve l 75.0% 0.0% 25.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 6.0% 0.0% 10.0% 5.5% % of Total 4.1% 0.0% 1.4% 5.5% 3.00 Count 15 1 5 21 % within GradeLeve l 71.4% 4.8% 23.8% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 30.0% 7.7% 50.0% 28.8%
  • 7. % of Total 20.5% 1.4% 6.8% 28.8% 4.00 Count 31 11 2 44 % within GradeLeve l 70.5% 25.0% 4.5% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 62.0% 84.6% 20.0% 60.3% % of Total 42.5% 15.1% 2.7% 60.3% Total Count 50 13 10 73 % within GradeLeve l 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% Concentration * BackgroundImage Crosstab Backgroun dImage Total 1.00 2.00 6.00 Concen tration 1.00 Count 12 3 2 17 % within Concentrat ion 70.6% 17.6% 11.8% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 24.0% 23.1% 20.0% 23.3% % of Total 16.4% 4.1% 2.7% 23.3% 2.00 Count 5 0 0 5
  • 8. % within Concentrat ion 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8% % of Total 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8% 3.00 Count 2 0 0 2 % within Concentrat ion 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% % of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 4.00 Count 5 5 1 11 % within Concentrat ion 45.5% 45.5% 9.1% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 10.0% 38.5% 10.0% 15.1% % of Total 6.8% 6.8% 1.4% 15.1% 5.00 Count 9 2 4 15 % within Concentrat ion 60.0% 13.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 18.0% 15.4% 40.0% 20.5% % of Total 12.3% 2.7% 5.5% 20.5% 6.00 Count 17 3 3 23
  • 9. % within Concentrat ion 73.9% 13.0% 13.0% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 34.0% 23.1% 30.0% 31.5% % of Total 23.3% 4.1% 4.1% 31.5% Total Count 50 13 10 73 % within Concentrat ion 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% % within Backgroun dImage 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.5% 17.8% 13.7% 100.0% Gender * TopResource Crosstab TopResource 1.00 2.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 Gender 1.00 Count 16 2 2 0 5 % within Gender 48.5% 6.1% 6.1% 0.0% 15.2% % within TopResour ce 51.6% 25.0% 66.7% 0.0% 38.5% % of Total 21.9% 2.7% 2.7% 0.0% 6.8% 2.00 Count 15 6 1 2 8 % within Gender 37.5% 15.0% 2.5% 5.0% 20.0% % within TopResour ce 48.4% 75.0% 33.3% 100.0% 61.5%
  • 10. % of Total 20.5% 8.2% 1.4% 2.7% 11.0% Total Count 31 8 3 2 13 % within Gender 42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8% % within TopResour ce 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8% GradeLevel * TopResource Crosstab TopResource 1.00 2.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 GradeL evel 1.00 Count 1 1 0 0 1 % within GradeLeve l 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% % within TopResour ce 3.2% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% % of Total 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 2.00 Count 2 1 0 0 0 % within GradeLeve l 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within TopResour ce 6.5% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 2.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.00 Count 9 3 1 0 6
  • 11. % within GradeLeve l 42.9% 14.3% 4.8% 0.0% 28.6% % within TopResour ce 29.0% 37.5% 33.3% 0.0% 46.2% % of Total 12.3% 4.1% 1.4% 0.0% 8.2% 4.00 Count 19 3 2 2 6 % within GradeLeve l 43.2% 6.8% 4.5% 4.5% 13.6% % within TopResour ce 61.3% 37.5% 66.7% 100.0% 46.2% % of Total 26.0% 4.1% 2.7% 2.7% 8.2% Total Count 31 8 3 2 13 % within GradeLeve l 42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8% % within TopResour ce 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8% Concentration * TopResource Crosstab TopResource 1.00 2.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 Conce ntration 1.00 Count 10 3 0 0 2 % within Concentrat ion 58.8% 17.6% 0.0% 0.0% 11.8%
  • 12. % within TopResou rce 32.3% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 15.4% % of Total 13.7% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 2.00 Count 2 1 1 0 1 % within Concentrat ion 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% % within TopResou rce 6.5% 12.5% 33.3% 0.0% 7.7% % of Total 2.7% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 3.00 Count 1 0 0 0 0 % within Concentrat ion 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within TopResou rce 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.00 Count 3 1 0 1 5 % within Concentrat ion 27.3% 9.1% 0.0% 9.1% 45.5% % within TopResou rce 9.7% 12.5% 0.0% 50.0% 38.5% % of Total 4.1% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 6.8% 5.00 Count 8 2 0 0 2 % within Concentrat ion 53.3% 13.3% 0.0% 0.0% 13.3%
  • 13. % within TopResou rce 25.8% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.4% % of Total 11.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 6.00 Count 7 1 2 1 3 % within Concentrat ion 30.4% 4.3% 8.7% 4.3% 13.0% % within TopResou rce 22.6% 12.5% 66.7% 50.0% 23.1% % of Total 9.6% 1.4% 2.7% 1.4% 4.1% Total Count 31 8 3 2 13 % within Concentrat ion 42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8% % within TopResou rce 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.5% 11.0% 4.1% 2.7% 17.8% Gender * TopicsForInformation Crosstab TopicsForInformation 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Gender 1.00 Count 7 3 12 6 5 % within Gender 21.2% 9.1% 36.4% 18.2% 15.2% % within TopicsForI nformation 50.0% 25.0% 52.2% 60.0% 38.5% % of Total 9.6% 4.1% 16.4% 8.2% 6.8%
  • 14. 2.00 Count 7 9 11 4 8 % within Gender 17.5% 22.5% 27.5% 10.0% 20.0% % within TopicsForI nformation 50.0% 75.0% 47.8% 40.0% 61.5% % of Total 9.6% 12.3% 15.1% 5.5% 11.0% Total Count 14 12 23 10 13 % within Gender 19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8% % within TopicsForI nformation 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8% GradeLevel * TopicsForInformation Crosstab TopicsForInformation 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 GradeL evel 1.00 Count 1 0 1 1 0 % within GradeLev el 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% % within TopicsForI nformation 7.1% 0.0% 4.3% 10.0% 0.0% % of Total 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 2.00 Count 1 1 1 0 1 % within GradeLev el 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0%
  • 15. % within TopicsForI nformation 7.1% 8.3% 4.3% 0.0% 7.7% % of Total 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 3.00 Count 4 3 7 2 5 % within GradeLev el 19.0% 14.3% 33.3% 9.5% 23.8% % within TopicsForI nformation 28.6% 25.0% 30.4% 20.0% 38.5% % of Total 5.5% 4.1% 9.6% 2.7% 6.8% 4.00 Count 8 8 14 7 7 % within GradeLev el 18.2% 18.2% 31.8% 15.9% 15.9% % within TopicsForI nformation 57.1% 66.7% 60.9% 70.0% 53.8% % of Total 11.0% 11.0% 19.2% 9.6% 9.6% Total Count 14 12 23 10 13 % within GradeLev el 19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8% % within TopicsForI nformation 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8% Concentration * TopicsForInformation Crosstab TopicsForInformation 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
  • 16. Conce ntratio n 1.00 Count 3 1 6 4 3 % within Concentra tion 17.6% 5.9% 35.3% 23.5% 17.6% % within TopicsForI nformation 21.4% 8.3% 26.1% 40.0% 23.1% % of Total 4.1% 1.4% 8.2% 5.5% 4.1% 2.00 Count 2 2 1 0 0 % within Concentra tion 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within TopicsForI nformation 14.3% 16.7% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 2.7% 2.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 3.00 Count 0 2 0 0 0 % within Concentra tion 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within TopicsForI nformation 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.00 Count 2 3 5 0 1 % within Concentra tion 18.2% 27.3% 45.5% 0.0% 9.1% % within TopicsForI nformation 14.3% 25.0% 21.7% 0.0% 7.7% % of Total 2.7% 4.1% 6.8% 0.0% 1.4%
  • 17. 5.00 Count 4 1 2 2 6 % within Concentra tion 26.7% 6.7% 13.3% 13.3% 40.0% % within TopicsForI nformation 28.6% 8.3% 8.7% 20.0% 46.2% % of Total 5.5% 1.4% 2.7% 2.7% 8.2% 6.00 Count 3 3 9 4 3 % within Concentra tion 13.0% 13.0% 39.1% 17.4% 13.0% % within TopicsForI nformation 21.4% 25.0% 39.1% 40.0% 23.1% % of Total 4.1% 4.1% 12.3% 5.5% 4.1% Total Count 14 12 23 10 13 % within Concentra tion 19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8% % within TopicsForI nformation 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.2% 16.4% 31.5% 13.7% 17.8% Gender * UseMihayloServices Crosstab UseMihayl oServices Total 1.00 2.00 Gender 1.00 Count 28 5 33
  • 18. % within Gender 84.8% 15.2% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 46.7% 38.5% 45.2% % of Total 38.4% 6.8% 45.2% 2.00 Count 32 8 40 % within Gender 80.0% 20.0% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 53.3% 61.5% 54.8% % of Total 43.8% 11.0% 54.8% Total Count 60 13 73 % within Gender 82.2% 17.8% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 82.2% 17.8% 100.0% GradeLevel * UseMihayloServices Crosstab UseMihayl oServices Total 1.00 2.00 GradeL evel 1.00 Count 2 2 4 % within GradeLeve l 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
  • 19. % within UseMihayl oServices 3.3% 15.4% 5.5% % of Total 2.7% 2.7% 5.5% 2.00 Count 2 2 4 % within GradeLeve l 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 3.3% 15.4% 5.5% % of Total 2.7% 2.7% 5.5% 3.00 Count 18 3 21 % within GradeLeve l 85.7% 14.3% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 30.0% 23.1% 28.8% % of Total 24.7% 4.1% 28.8% 4.00 Count 38 6 44 % within GradeLeve l 86.4% 13.6% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 63.3% 46.2% 60.3% % of Total 52.1% 8.2% 60.3% Total Count 60 13 73 % within GradeLeve l 82.2% 17.8% 100.0%
  • 20. % within UseMihayl oServices 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 82.2% 17.8% 100.0% Concentration * UseMihayloServices Crosstab UseMihayl oServices Total 1.00 2.00 Concen tration 1.00 Count 15 2 17 % within Concentrat ion 88.2% 11.8% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 25.0% 15.4% 23.3% % of Total 20.5% 2.7% 23.3% 2.00 Count 5 0 5 % within Concentrat ion 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 8.3% 0.0% 6.8% % of Total 6.8% 0.0% 6.8% 3.00 Count 2 0 2 % within Concentrat ion 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 3.3% 0.0% 2.7%
  • 21. % of Total 2.7% 0.0% 2.7% 4.00 Count 11 0 11 % within Concentrat ion 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 18.3% 0.0% 15.1% % of Total 15.1% 0.0% 15.1% 5.00 Count 10 5 15 % within Concentrat ion 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 16.7% 38.5% 20.5% % of Total 13.7% 6.8% 20.5% 6.00 Count 17 6 23 % within Concentrat ion 73.9% 26.1% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 28.3% 46.2% 31.5% % of Total 23.3% 8.2% 31.5% Total Count 60 13 73 % within Concentrat ion 82.2% 17.8% 100.0% % within UseMihayl oServices 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
  • 22. % of Total 82.2% 17.8% 100.0% Gender * MostOftenServices Crosstab MostOftenServices 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Gender 1.00 Count 4 6 1 1 1 % within Gender 12.1% 18.2% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% % within MostOften Services 66.7% 54.5% 20.0% 33.3% 33.3% % of Total 5.5% 8.2% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 2.00 Count 2 5 4 2 2 % within Gender 5.0% 12.5% 10.0% 5.0% 5.0% % within MostOften Services 33.3% 45.5% 80.0% 66.7% 66.7% % of Total 2.7% 6.8% 5.5% 2.7% 2.7% Total Count 6 11 5 3 3 % within Gender 8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1% % within MostOften Services 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1% GradeLevel * MostOftenServices Crosstab MostOftenServices
  • 23. 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 GradeL evel 1.00 Count 0 1 1 0 0 % within GradeLev el 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within MostOften Services 0.0% 9.1% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.00 Count 0 0 0 0 1 % within GradeLev el 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% % within MostOften Services 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% % of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 3.00 Count 2 5 1 0 1 % within GradeLev el 9.5% 23.8% 4.8% 0.0% 4.8% % within MostOften Services 33.3% 45.5% 20.0% 0.0% 33.3% % of Total 2.7% 6.8% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 4.00 Count 4 5 3 3 1 % within GradeLev el 9.1% 11.4% 6.8% 6.8% 2.3% % within MostOften Services 66.7% 45.5% 60.0% 100.0% 33.3%
  • 24. % of Total 5.5% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1% 1.4% Total Count 6 11 5 3 3 % within GradeLev el 8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1% % within MostOften Services 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1% Concentration * MostOftenServices Crosstab MostOftenServices 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Conce ntratio n 1.00 Count 1 4 0 0 1 % within Concentra tion 5.9% 23.5% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% % within MostOften Services 16.7% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% % of Total 1.4% 5.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 2.00 Count 0 1 1 0 0 % within Concentra tion 0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within MostOften Services 0.0% 9.1% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 3.00 Count 0 0 0 0 0
  • 25. % within Concentra tion 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within MostOften Services 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.00 Count 0 1 2 0 1 % within Concentra tion 0.0% 9.1% 18.2% 0.0% 9.1% % within MostOften Services 0.0% 9.1% 40.0% 0.0% 33.3% % of Total 0.0% 1.4% 2.7% 0.0% 1.4% 5.00 Count 1 0 2 1 1 % within Concentra tion 6.7% 0.0% 13.3% 6.7% 6.7% % within MostOften Services 16.7% 0.0% 40.0% 33.3% 33.3% % of Total 1.4% 0.0% 2.7% 1.4% 1.4% 6.00 Count 4 5 0 2 0 % within Concentra tion 17.4% 21.7% 0.0% 8.7% 0.0% % within MostOften Services 66.7% 45.5% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% % of Total 5.5% 6.8% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% Total Count 6 11 5 3 3
  • 26. % within Concentra tion 8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1% % within MostOften Services 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 8.2% 15.1% 6.8% 4.1% 4.1% Gender * WebsiteVisits Crosstab WebsiteVi sits Total 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 Gender 1.00 Count 10 20 1 2 33 % within Gender 30.3% 60.6% 3.0% 6.1% 100.0% % within WebsiteVi sits 43.5% 47.6% 20.0% 66.7% 45.2% % of Total 13.7% 27.4% 1.4% 2.7% 45.2% 2.00 Count 13 22 4 1 40 % within Gender 32.5% 55.0% 10.0% 2.5% 100.0% % within WebsiteVi sits 56.5% 52.4% 80.0% 33.3% 54.8% % of Total 17.8% 30.1% 5.5% 1.4% 54.8% Total Count 23 42 5 3 73 % within Gender 31.5% 57.5% 6.8% 4.1% 100.0%
  • 27. % within WebsiteVi sits 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.5% 57.5% 6.8% 4.1% 100.0% Concentration * WebsiteVisits Crosstab WebsiteVi sits Total 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 Conce ntration 1.00 Count 6 8 3 0 17 % within Concentrat ion 35.3% 47.1% 17.6% 0.0% 100.0% % within WebsiteVi sits 26.1% 19.0% 60.0% 0.0% 23.3% % of Total 8.2% 11.0% 4.1% 0.0% 23.3% 2.00 Count 1 2 0 2 5 % within Concentrat ion 20.0% 40.0% 0.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within WebsiteVi sits 4.3% 4.8% 0.0% 66.7% 6.8% % of Total 1.4% 2.7% 0.0% 2.7% 6.8% 3.00 Count 0 1 0 1 2 % within Concentrat ion 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within WebsiteVi sits 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 33.3% 2.7%
  • 28. % of Total 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 2.7% 4.00 Count 2 7 2 0 11 % within Concentrat ion 18.2% 63.6% 18.2% 0.0% 100.0% % within WebsiteVi sits 8.7% 16.7% 40.0% 0.0% 15.1% % of Total 2.7% 9.6% 2.7% 0.0% 15.1% 5.00 Count 5 10 0 0 15 % within Concentrat ion 33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % within WebsiteVi sits 21.7% 23.8% 0.0% 0.0% 20.5% % of Total 6.8% 13.7% 0.0% 0.0% 20.5% 6.00 Count 9 14 0 0 23 % within Concentrat ion 39.1% 60.9% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % within WebsiteVi sits 39.1% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 31.5% % of Total 12.3% 19.2% 0.0% 0.0% 31.5% Total Count 23 42 5 3 73 % within Concentrat ion 31.5% 57.5% 6.8% 4.1% 100.0% % within WebsiteVi sits 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
  • 29. % of Total 31.5% 57.5% 6.8% 4.1% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi- Square 39.594 15 .001 Likelihood Ratio 27.387 15 .026 Linear-by- Linear Associatio n 3.348 1 .067 N of Valid Cases 73 Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Error Approx. T Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.216 .106 -1.861 .067 Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.195 .116 -1.679 .097 N of Valid Cases 73 CROSSTABS /TABLES=Gender GradeLevel Concentration BY WhyVisitWebsite /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES /STATISTICS=CHISQ CORR /CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL /COUNT ROUND CELL.
  • 30. Crosstabs Notes Output Created 01-MAY-2013 15:45:24 Comments Input Data C:Usersuser1DesktopMi haylo SPSS.sav Active Dataset DataSet1 Filter <none> Weight <none> Split File <none> N of Rows in Working Data File 73 Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as missing. Cases Used Statistics for each table are based on all the cases with valid data in the specified range(s) for all variables in each table. Syntax CROSSTABS /TABLES=Gender GradeLevel Concentration BY WhyVisitWebsite /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES /STATISTICS=CHISQ CORR /CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL /COUNT ROUND CELL.
  • 31. Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.03 Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02 Dimensions Requested 2 Cells Available 131029 [DataSet1] C:Usersuser1DesktopMihaylo SPSS.sav Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Gender * WhyVisitW ebsite 73 100.0% 0 0.0% 73 100.0% GradeLeve l * WhyVisitW ebsite 73 100.0% 0 0.0% 73 100.0% Concentrat ion * WhyVisitW ebsite 73 100.0% 0 0.0% 73 100.0% Gender * WhyVisitWebsite Crosstab WhyVisitWebsite 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
  • 32. Gender 1.00 Count 10 2 3 7 3 % within Gender 30.3% 6.1% 9.1% 21.2% 9.1% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 37.0% 25.0% 60.0% 58.3% 50.0% % of Total 13.7% 2.7% 4.1% 9.6% 4.1% 2.00 Count 17 6 2 5 3 % within Gender 42.5% 15.0% 5.0% 12.5% 7.5% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 63.0% 75.0% 40.0% 41.7% 50.0% % of Total 23.3% 8.2% 2.7% 6.8% 4.1% Total Count 27 8 5 12 6 % within Gender 37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4% 8.2% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4% 8.2% GradeLevel * WhyVisitWebsite Crosstab WhyVisitWebsite 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 GradeL evel 1.00 Count 2 0 0 0 0 % within GradeLev el 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
  • 33. % within WhyVisitW ebsite 7.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.00 Count 2 1 0 1 0 % within GradeLev el 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 7.4% 12.5% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% % of Total 2.7% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 3.00 Count 6 1 1 6 3 % within GradeLev el 28.6% 4.8% 4.8% 28.6% 14.3% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 22.2% 12.5% 20.0% 50.0% 50.0% % of Total 8.2% 1.4% 1.4% 8.2% 4.1% 4.00 Count 17 6 4 5 3 % within GradeLev el 38.6% 13.6% 9.1% 11.4% 6.8% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 63.0% 75.0% 80.0% 41.7% 50.0% % of Total 23.3% 8.2% 5.5% 6.8% 4.1% Total Count 27 8 5 12 6 % within GradeLev el 37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4% 8.2%
  • 34. % within WhyVisitW ebsite 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4% 8.2% Concentration * WhyVisitWebsite Crosstab WhyVisitWebsite 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 Concen tration 1.00 Count 5 4 1 2 % within Concentrat ion 29.4% 23.5% 5.9% 11.8% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 18.5% 50.0% 20.0% 16.7% % of Total 6.8% 5.5% 1.4% 2.7% 2.00 Count 2 0 0 2 % within Concentrat ion 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 7.4% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% % of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 3.00 Count 1 0 0 1 % within Concentrat ion 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3% % of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4%
  • 35. 4.00 Count 5 2 0 1 % within Concentrat ion 45.5% 18.2% 0.0% 9.1% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 18.5% 25.0% 0.0% 8.3% % of Total 6.8% 2.7% 0.0% 1.4% 5.00 Count 5 2 1 3 % within Concentrat ion 33.3% 13.3% 6.7% 20.0% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 18.5% 25.0% 20.0% 25.0% % of Total 6.8% 2.7% 1.4% 4.1% 6.00 Count 9 0 3 3 % within Concentrat ion 39.1% 0.0% 13.0% 13.0% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 33.3% 0.0% 60.0% 25.0% % of Total 12.3% 0.0% 4.1% 4.1% Total Count 27 8 5 12 % within Concentrat ion 37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4% % within WhyVisitW ebsite 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 37.0% 11.0% 6.8% 16.4%
  • 36. Gender * MihayloImprovements Crosstab MihayloImprovements 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Gender 1.00 Count 12 5 3 0 7 % within Gender 36.4% 15.2% 9.1% 0.0% 21.2% % within MihayloIm provement s 60.0% 50.0% 27.3% 0.0% 36.8% % of Total 16.4% 6.8% 4.1% 0.0% 9.6% 2.00 Count 8 5 8 3 12 % within Gender 20.0% 12.5% 20.0% 7.5% 30.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 40.0% 50.0% 72.7% 100.0% 63.2% % of Total 11.0% 6.8% 11.0% 4.1% 16.4% Total Count 20 10 11 3 19 % within Gender 27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0% GradeLevel * MihayloImprovements Crosstab
  • 37. MihayloImprovements 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 GradeL evel 1.00 Count 1 0 0 1 2 % within GradeLev el 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 10.5% % of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 2.7% 2.00 Count 2 1 0 0 1 % within GradeLev el 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% % of Total 2.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 3.00 Count 5 2 4 0 4 % within GradeLev el 23.8% 9.5% 19.0% 0.0% 19.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 25.0% 20.0% 36.4% 0.0% 21.1% % of Total 6.8% 2.7% 5.5% 0.0% 5.5% 4.00 Count 12 7 7 2 12
  • 38. % within GradeLev el 27.3% 15.9% 15.9% 4.5% 27.3% % within MihayloIm provement s 60.0% 70.0% 63.6% 66.7% 63.2% % of Total 16.4% 9.6% 9.6% 2.7% 16.4% Total Count 20 10 11 3 19 % within GradeLev el 27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0% Concentration * MihayloImprovements Crosstab MihayloImprovements 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Conce ntratio n 1.00 Count 5 2 1 1 4 % within Concentra tion 29.4% 11.8% 5.9% 5.9% 23.5% % within MihayloIm provement s 25.0% 20.0% 9.1% 33.3% 21.1% % of Total 6.8% 2.7% 1.4% 1.4% 5.5% 2.00 Count 2 0 2 0 0
  • 39. % within Concentra tion 40.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 10.0% 0.0% 18.2% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 2.7% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 3.00 Count 1 0 0 0 1 % within Concentra tion 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% % of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 4.00 Count 3 2 3 1 2 % within Concentra tion 27.3% 18.2% 27.3% 9.1% 18.2% % within MihayloIm provement s 15.0% 20.0% 27.3% 33.3% 10.5% % of Total 4.1% 2.7% 4.1% 1.4% 2.7% 5.00 Count 6 1 1 1 3 % within Concentra tion 40.0% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 20.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 30.0% 10.0% 9.1% 33.3% 15.8%
  • 40. % of Total 8.2% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 4.1% 6.00 Count 3 5 4 0 9 % within Concentra tion 13.0% 21.7% 17.4% 0.0% 39.1% % within MihayloIm provement s 15.0% 50.0% 36.4% 0.0% 47.4% % of Total 4.1% 6.8% 5.5% 0.0% 12.3% Total Count 20 10 11 3 19 % within Concentra tion 27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0% % within MihayloIm provement s 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 27.4% 13.7% 15.1% 4.1% 26.0% Gender * PerceptionofWebsite Crosstab PerceptionofWebsite 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Gender 1.00 Count 13 5 5 7 3 % within Gender 39.4% 15.2% 15.2% 21.2% 9.1% % within Perception ofWebsite 38.2% 50.0% 41.7% 77.8% 50.0% % of Total 17.8% 6.8% 6.8% 9.6% 4.1% 2.00 Count 21 5 7 2 3
  • 41. % within Gender 52.5% 12.5% 17.5% 5.0% 7.5% % within Perception ofWebsite 61.8% 50.0% 58.3% 22.2% 50.0% % of Total 28.8% 6.8% 9.6% 2.7% 4.1% Total Count 34 10 12 9 6 % within Gender 46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2% % within Perception ofWebsite 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2% GradeLevel * PerceptionofWebsite Crosstab PerceptionofWebsite 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 GradeL evel 1.00 Count 2 2 0 0 0 % within GradeLev el 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within Perception ofWebsite 5.9% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 2.7% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.00 Count 2 0 1 0 1 % within GradeLev el 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0%
  • 42. % within Perception ofWebsite 5.9% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 16.7% % of Total 2.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 3.00 Count 6 5 6 1 2 % within GradeLev el 28.6% 23.8% 28.6% 4.8% 9.5% % within Perception ofWebsite 17.6% 50.0% 50.0% 11.1% 33.3% % of Total 8.2% 6.8% 8.2% 1.4% 2.7% 4.00 Count 24 3 5 8 3 % within GradeLev el 54.5% 6.8% 11.4% 18.2% 6.8% % within Perception ofWebsite 70.6% 30.0% 41.7% 88.9% 50.0% % of Total 32.9% 4.1% 6.8% 11.0% 4.1% Total Count 34 10 12 9 6 % within GradeLev el 46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2% % within Perception ofWebsite 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2% Concentration * PerceptionofWebsite Crosstab PerceptionofWebsite
  • 43. 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Conce ntratio n 1.00 Count 7 4 2 1 2 % within Concentra tion 41.2% 23.5% 11.8% 5.9% 11.8% % within Perceptio nofWebsit e 20.6% 40.0% 16.7% 11.1% 33.3% % of Total 9.6% 5.5% 2.7% 1.4% 2.7% 2.00 Count 3 0 2 0 0 % within Concentra tion 60.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within Perceptio nofWebsit e 8.8% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 4.1% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 3.00 Count 2 0 0 0 0 % within Concentra tion 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % within Perceptio nofWebsit e 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.00 Count 5 1 2 3 0 % within Concentra tion 45.5% 9.1% 18.2% 27.3% 0.0%
  • 44. % within Perceptio nofWebsit e 14.7% 10.0% 16.7% 33.3% 0.0% % of Total 6.8% 1.4% 2.7% 4.1% 0.0% 5.00 Count 7 2 3 1 2 % within Concentra tion 46.7% 13.3% 20.0% 6.7% 13.3% % within Perceptio nofWebsit e 20.6% 20.0% 25.0% 11.1% 33.3% % of Total 9.6% 2.7% 4.1% 1.4% 2.7% 6.00 Count 10 3 3 4 2 % within Concentra tion 43.5% 13.0% 13.0% 17.4% 8.7% % within Perceptio nofWebsit e 29.4% 30.0% 25.0% 44.4% 33.3% % of Total 13.7% 4.1% 4.1% 5.5% 2.7% Total Count 34 10 12 9 6 % within Concentra tion 46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2% % within Perceptio nofWebsit e 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.6% 13.7% 16.4% 12.3% 8.2%
  • 45. Gender * ScaleOfCommunication Crosstab ScaleOfCommunication 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Gender 1.00 Count 5 3 14 10 1 % within Gender 15.2% 9.1% 42.4% 30.3% 3.0% % within ScaleOfCo mmunicati on 50.0% 75.0% 45.2% 43.5% 20.0% % of Total 6.8% 4.1% 19.2% 13.7% 1.4% 2.00 Count 5 1 17 13 4 % within Gender 12.5% 2.5% 42.5% 32.5% 10.0% % within ScaleOfCo mmunicati on 50.0% 25.0% 54.8% 56.5% 80.0% % of Total 6.8% 1.4% 23.3% 17.8% 5.5% Total Count 10 4 31 23 5 % within Gender 13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8% % within ScaleOfCo mmunicati on 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8% GradeLevel * ScaleOfCommunication Crosstab
  • 46. ScaleOfCommunication 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 GradeL evel 1.00 Count 2 0 0 2 0 % within GradeLev el 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% % within ScaleOfCo mmunicati on 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.7% 0.0% % of Total 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 2.00 Count 1 0 0 2 1 % within GradeLev el 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0% % within ScaleOfCo mmunicati on 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.7% 20.0% % of Total 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 1.4% 3.00 Count 1 1 7 10 2 % within GradeLev el 4.8% 4.8% 33.3% 47.6% 9.5% % within ScaleOfCo mmunicati on 10.0% 25.0% 22.6% 43.5% 40.0% % of Total 1.4% 1.4% 9.6% 13.7% 2.7% 4.00 Count 6 3 24 9 2
  • 47. % within GradeLev el 13.6% 6.8% 54.5% 20.5% 4.5% % within ScaleOfCo mmunicati on 60.0% 75.0% 77.4% 39.1% 40.0% % of Total 8.2% 4.1% 32.9% 12.3% 2.7% Total Count 10 4 31 23 5 % within GradeLev el 13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8% % within ScaleOfCo mmunicati on 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8% Concentration * ScaleOfCommunication Crosstab ScaleOfCommunication 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Conce ntratio n 1.00 Count 2 1 6 6 2 % within Concentra tion 11.8% 5.9% 35.3% 35.3% 11.8% % within ScaleOfC ommunica tion 20.0% 25.0% 19.4% 26.1% 40.0% % of Total 2.7% 1.4% 8.2% 8.2% 2.7% 2.00 Count 0 0 1 3 1
  • 48. % within Concentra tion 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% % within ScaleOfC ommunica tion 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 13.0% 20.0% % of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 4.1% 1.4% 3.00 Count 0 0 1 1 0 % within Concentra tion 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% % within ScaleOfC ommunica tion 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 4.3% 0.0% % of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 4.00 Count 0 1 6 3 1 % within Concentra tion 0.0% 9.1% 54.5% 27.3% 9.1% % within ScaleOfC ommunica tion 0.0% 25.0% 19.4% 13.0% 20.0% % of Total 0.0% 1.4% 8.2% 4.1% 1.4% 5.00 Count 2 1 4 7 1 % within Concentra tion 13.3% 6.7% 26.7% 46.7% 6.7% % within ScaleOfC ommunica tion 20.0% 25.0% 12.9% 30.4% 20.0%
  • 49. % of Total 2.7% 1.4% 5.5% 9.6% 1.4% 6.00 Count 6 1 13 3 0 % within Concentra tion 26.1% 4.3% 56.5% 13.0% 0.0% % within ScaleOfC ommunica tion 60.0% 25.0% 41.9% 13.0% 0.0% % of Total 8.2% 1.4% 17.8% 4.1% 0.0% Total Count 10 4 31 23 5 % within Concentra tion 13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8% % within ScaleOfC ommunica tion 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.7% 5.5% 42.5% 31.5% 6.8%