2. Read the articles
completely in each topic together
Take notes in an organized manner: computer files,
note cards, etc.
Include all bibliographic info, especially page
number when quoting!
Flag like information with same color post-its across
articles.
2
4. Analyze
varying definitions of key terms
methodology used
size & generalizability of subject pool
innovative methodology
enough evidence?
findings consistent with those of similar
studies?
4
5. Analyze
currency: lit review shows the latest work
done in subject area. (last 5 years on average)
Include older articles if:
landmark study
only evidence on a topic
helps explain the evolution of the
research
5
6. Synthesize the Literature
How does each article relate to your topic and
purpose?
Define your argument/thesis.
Identify major trends or patterns emerging
from your reading.
6
7. Synthesize
Reassemble your notes based on results of reading, using
organizational aids such as post-its, flags, etc.
Revise original outline of categories
Create a detailed topic outline
begin with your “argument” or claim
present evidence from articles researched that proves your claim
Do not string together a summary of articles. The outline is topic
driven.
7
8. Sample topic outline
Psychological Aspects of Organ Donation: Individual and Next-of-Kin Donation
Decisions
I. Introduction IV. Methodological issues and directions for
future research
A. Establish importance of topic (cite
statistics on scarcity of organs). A. Improvement in attitude measures and
measurement strategy.
B. Delimit the review to psychological
components of decisions. B. Greater differentiation by type of
donation.
C. Describe organization of the paper,
indicating that the remaining topics in C. Stronger theoretical emphasis.
the outline will be discussed. D. Greater interdisciplinary focus.
II. Individual decisions regarding posthumous V. Summary, Conclusions, and Implications
organ donation A. Summary of points I-IV.
A. Beliefs about organ donation B. Need well-developed theoretical
B. Attitudes toward donating models of attitudes and decision
C. Stated willingness to donate making.
D. Summary of research on individual C. Current survey data limited in scope
decisions and application points to need for
more sophisticated research in the future.
III. Next-of-kin consent decisions
D. Need more use of sophisticated data
A. Beliefs about donating others’ organs. analytic techniques.
B. Attitudes toward next-of-kin donations. E. Conclusion: Psychology can draw from various
C. Summary of research on next-of-kin subdisciplines for an understanding of
consent decisions donation decisions so intervention strategies
can be identifiable. Desperately need to
increase the available supply of donor organs.
8
9. Synthesize
Note on your topic outline relationships among
studies: which researchers, what page, etc. support
each point?
Note consistency of results from study to study.
Note discrepancies among studies and provide
possible explanations such as dates of studies,
different methodologies.
9
10. Synthesize
Note landmark studies and if replicated.
Note how individual studies help illustrate or
advance theoretical notions.
Note gaps or areas needing more research.
Make sure your detailed outline follows a
logical sequence of topics and subtopics. This
will give your literature review the coherence
it needs.
10
11. Some problems could be …
Lacking organization and structure
Lacking focus, unity and coherence
Being repetitive and verbose
Failing to cite influential papers
Failing to keep up with recent developments
Failing to critically evaluate cited papers
Citing irrelevant references
Depending too much on secondary sources
11