The document discusses the environmental issues caused by plastic tampon applicators that end up in landfills. It notes that plastic applicators pile up in bathroom trash cans and are thrown into landfills by waste management companies. This leads to more pollution as landfills fill up. The document recommends using o.b. tampons instead, as they do not have plastic applicators so produce less waste, require fewer landfills, and result in less pollution.
2. What’s even more gross are those plastic applicators that just end up
piled to the brim of the bathroom waste basket, picked up by waste
management companies, picked through by employees of waste
management companies, and thrown into a land ll somewhere, until
that one’s full, and they ll another one and another one and another
one until the world is covered in your tampon trash.
at’s why you should use o.b., instead. Not only are they super compact
and totally comfortable, but they don’t have applicators, and without
applicators, there’s less waste. And with less waste come less land lls and
with less land lls comes less pollution. And with less pollution comes a
greener earth we can all stand to live on.
7. Those three words refer to the procedures more than
100 million girls have undergone to remove their
external genitalia for non-medical purposes. It’s also
known as cutting, and another 3 million are at risk of
being cut every year. For those millions of girls around
the world, those three words are the hardest they will
ever know.
Our mission is to stop cutting from ruining the lives of
millions.
Find out more information and donate to our cause at
SpeakOutAgainstFGM.org.
8.
9.
10.
11. ,
, ,
European treats. Panadería prices.
European treats. Panadería prices. European treats. Panadería prices.