AV product review test results: Kaspersky Internet Security Norton Internet Security McAfee Internet Security Comodo Internet Security PC Tools Internet Security Online Solutions Security Suite Outpost Security Suite BitDefender Internet Security avast! Internet Security F-Secure Internet Security Trend Micro Internet Security ESET Smart Security Avira Premium Security Suite AVG Internet Security G Data InternetSecurity Panda Internet Security

1. META-REVIEWInternet Security – Antivirus & Firewall solutionsuites Test resultcomparison Version 1.0 April 2011

2. Sometestedsecuritysuitesolutions Comodo Internet Security PC Tools Internet Security Online Solutions Security Suite Outpost Security Suite Kaspersky Internet Security BitDefender Internet Security Norton Internet Security avast! Internet Security F-Secure Internet Security Trend Micro Internet Security ESET Smart Security Avira Premium Security Suite AVG Internet Security G Data InternetSecurity McAfee Internet Security Panda Internet Security

3. matousec http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php

5. matousecresults – thewinners

6. Loser productsaccordingtomatousec

7. Interpretation of matousecresults (Quote) “The best product tested against the latest set of tests and the Proactive Security Challenge leader is currently Comodo Internet Security 5.3with the perfect 100% score. The leader is closely followed by PC Tools Internet Security 2011 and Online Solutions Security Suite 1.5 with 99 %, Outpost Security Suite Free 7.0 and Outpost Security Suite Pro 7.0 with 97 %, Kaspersky Internet Security 2011 with 92 %, and Privatefirewall 7.0 These are the only products that reached the Excellent protection level. Malware Defender 2.6.0 with 90%, Jetico Personal Firewall 2.1 with 88% and BitDefender Internet Security 2011 with 84% score come next. All these products have been awarded with Proactive Security Challenge awards. It seems that Proactive Security Challenge tests make a big difference between really good products and the rest of the world. Most of the products are filtered in very low levels which means that they probably miss some critical features.”

8. matousec final results

9. http://www.av-comparatives.org/en/comparativesreviews/dynamic-tests

10. AV-Comparativestest

11. AV-Comparativesresults http://www.av-comparatives.org/images/stories/test/dyn/wholedynamic2010.pdf

12. AV-Comparatives final results

13. AV-Comparatives final results

14. ONLY WINNER IN BOTH TESTSAV-Comparatives & matousec http://www.av-comparatives.org/en/comparativesreviews/dynamic-tests http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php

15. Kaspersky Internet Security 2011

16. Researchedby @konterkariert on Twitter Sources: AV-Comparatives: http://www.av-comparatives.org/en/comparativesreviews/dynamic-tests Matousec: http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php