Trends in Resource Sharing: More than Just Numbers
1. Trends in Resource Sharing:
More than Just Numbers
Mary E. Jackson
Product Manager, Resource Sharing
Auto-Graphics, Inc.
NELINET 27th Annual Resource Sharing Meeting
June 1, 2007
2. Overview of Presentation
• Summarize a baker’s dozen emerging
resource sharing trends
• Some are being implemented; some are
more long term initiatives
• Comment on the implications for current
workflow, policies, and staffing
• Respond to your questions and
comments
2
3. The Key Trend:
Resource Sharing is no longer
about library staff efficiency:
it’s about our users.
It needs to be..
3
4. …As Easy as Google
(even with a Swedish interface)
4
9. 1. Emerging Service Model
• Item not held locally, in use, or perhaps
just inconvenient to access – same
user-centered and barrier-free access
and ordering policies apply
• Circ. holds placed in one or more
shared or virtual catalogs
• If unfilled, requests move seamlessly to
mediated RS environment
9
10. What do we call this Service?
User-initiated borrowing
Unmediated ILL
Unmediated resource sharing
Direct borrowing
Direct consortial borrowing
Circulation-based sharing
Extended circulation
Remote circulation
Enlightened resource sharing
Not your mother’s ILL?
10
11. 2. Seamless to the User:
Search, Find, Get
• Services available where they are
• Single search interface
• Single “I need this” button
• Invisible, reliable suppliers
• Fast, predictable delivery
• Consistent loan periods, no/low fees,
no/few rules
11
12. 3: Convenient
• To the user and the library
• RSS feeds, email notifications, cell
phone alerts, and other push
technologies to users
• Users select most convenient options
for delivery, notification, payment, etc.
• Libraries no longer use multiple
messaging systems
12
13. 4. Trust our Users
• 80% of Finns have library cards
• 63% of Americans have library cards
– ALA Campaign for America’s Libraries, 2006
• 50% of Australians, Swedes, and Norwegians
are members of a public library
• Loss rate is higher for
local circulation than
for ILL
13
14. 5. Ease of Use vs. Privacy
• Cookies to remember basic information
• More detailed information about user to
provide more customized service
– Preferences for delivery, payment, language, etc.
– Volume of ordering
– Tardiness level (average days late)
– Number currently on loan (RS and circ.)
– What user ordered within last 24 months
• User information deleted when requests
are completed
14
18. 8. Suppliers Bid on Requests
• Libraries, Document Suppliers, and
Online Booksellers
• Ranking/evaluation of service based on
bidding volume, fill rate, and speed of
response
• Less differential between fees
• Better match between staffing and
processing capacity
18
19. 9. Material Delivered to the
Home or Office
• OCLC WorldCat Resource Sharing Pilot
Project
• National Library of Australia’s project
• Email notification of delivery
• Patron can track delivery
• Material returned in
reply-paid box or
envelope
19
20. 10. Standards are Essential,
but Must be Invisible
• Z39.50
• OpenURL
• OpenURL Request Transfer Message
• SIP2
• NCIP
• ISO ILL
20
21. 11. Real-Time Updating of
Union Catalogs
• Lender responds “do not own” – record
in OPAC and in union catalog updated
or deleted
• Higher fill
rates
• Higher user
satisfaction
21
22. 12. Numbers Still a Driver
• Handles the increasing demands from
local patrons, and from other libraries
From 1986-2005
ARL statistics:
• Borrowing up 265%
• Lending up126%
22
23. Numbers Still a Driver
“User-initiated
ILL/DD provides
better services to
users than
mediated
ILL/DD.” 2004
23
24. Numbers Still a Driver:
Borrowing
Mediated User-Initiated
– $17.50 unit cost – $2.39 - $14.70
unit cost
– 86% fill rate
– 84 – 90% fill
– 7.6 calendar
rate
days
– 2.5 – 6.6
calendar days
24
25. Numbers Still a Driver:
Lending
Mediated User-Initiated
– $9.27 unit cost – $3.27 - $12.06
unit cost
– 58% fill rate
– 82 – 87% fill
– 1.5 calendar
rate
days
– 0.1 – 1.5
calendar days
25
26. Numbers Still a Driver
• ILL transactions are small percentage of
circulation
– Lorcan Dempsey: 1.7%
– Jackson, 2004: 3.9%
– Australia: 2003: 0.4%
26
27. 13. Rethinking Resource
Sharing Initiative
• Global, user-centric service framework
• Users obtain what they need based on:
– Cost
– Time
– Format
– Delivery
• Practices and procedures no longer
based on library-centric policies and
barriers
27
29. “Ultimate motivation for using a discovery
service is ‘getting.’ Without efficient
‘getting,’ there is little point in providing
even the best discovery service.”
National Library of Australia
29
30. Thank You!
Any Questions?
Mary E. Jackson
Product Manager, Resource Sharing
Auto-Graphics, Inc.
mej@auto-graphics.com
909/569-1507
30
