![The SPARK Hypothesis ,[object Object]]()
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to WKKF SPARK Network Meeting Results
Similar to WKKF SPARK Network Meeting Results (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
WKKF SPARK Network Meeting Results
- 1. W.K. Kellogg Foundation SPARK Networking Meeting Battle Creek, Michigan January 28, 2009 Supporting Partnerships to Assure Ready Kids Initiative Level Evaluation Results Patrick A. Curtis, Vice President, Walter R. McDonald & Associates Kate Anderson Simons, Consultant, Walter R. McDonald & Associates
- 5. SPARK Florida Risk Factors (2005–2006 through 2007–2008 School Years) Children Free / Reduced Lunch (%) Special Ed (%) ESOL (%) Kindergarten SPARK (N=391) 93 6.6 60 MDPS (N=25,963) 60 5.9 52 First Grade SPARK (N=391) 92 6 44 MDPS (N=25,963) 69 7 51 Second Grade SPARK (N=482) 92 9 37 MDPS (N=26,024) 70 8 42
- 7. SPARK Ohio
- 8. SPARK Hawaii Children with ECE Compared to Children without ECE and Non-SPARK children Key: 1 = Not Yet; 2 = Beginning; 3 = Sometimes; 4 = Almost Always. I-HSRA Domains SPARK HI with ECE n = 49 SPARK HI without ECE n = 118 Non-SPARK n = 448 Approaches 3.2 3.1 3.0 Literacy 3.2 3.0 2.7 Math 3.3 3.1 2.7 Behavioral 3.4 3.3 3.0 Social / Emotional 3.4 3.3 3.0 Physical Well-Being 3.6 3.5 3.3
- 10. SPARK Florida First Grade Grades by Number of Years in SPARK
- 11. SPARK Ohio Canton City On-Time Promotion for SPARK and Non-SPARK Children Children Grade 1 Grade 2 Cohort I (Fall 2005) SPARK 94.4% (n=36) 79.4% (n=34) Non-SPARK 89.7% (n=116) 76.5% (n=115) Cohort II (Fall 2006) SPARK 98.0% (n=51) Non-SPARK 93.2% (n=103)
- 14. SPARK Mississippi ECERS Subscale Scores for Public School Classrooms
- 19. All SPARK Grantees Total Resources Leveraged to Date June 2003 through May 2008 Grantee Total Leveraged Funds Total In-Kind Contributions Total Leveraged Resources DC $6,019,000 $158,750 $6,177,750 Florida $53,680,115 $1,475,000 $55,155,115 Georgia $24,993,487 $1,756,322 $26,749,809 Hawaii $2,576,365 $1,634,186 $4,210,551 Mississippi $389,680 $113,888 $503,568 New Mexico $1,207,975 $806,225 $2,014,200 North Carolina $7,194,555 $697,336 $7,891,891 Ohio $3,543,800 $193,963 $3,737,763 Total $99,604,977 $6,835,670 $106,440,647
Editor's Notes
- We are the initiative level evaluators for SPARK. We have been working on this project since the fall of 2001 when SPARK began with a planning phase. The purpose of the ILE is to gather and disseminate learning derived from the initiative. We do monitor grantee activities, but the detailed accounting of SPARK outcomes were performed by the PLEs, which you saw in the gallery walk this morning. We are going to organize this presentation around ready kids, schools and communities. We will present for about 45 minutes and end with 30 minutes of Q and A. A few points to make: (1) You cannot tell the SPARK story in a short amount of time. For example, in our report we define what we mean by ready kids, schools, and communities. There are sections about parent engagement and what we call the SPARK partnership model, which we hope explains, in part, how the SPARK partnerships accomplished what they did. (2) As we move from Ready Kids to Ready Schools to Ready Communities, the data become more qualitative (3) At our poster session we will provide you with a form/checklist. You may order any of the publications, annual reports, site visit reports, and survey conducted by the ILE Team.