12. Ahmadabad and Indore stock exchanges were other exchanges having similar structure.
13.
14. These exchanges worked like a co-operative society where the share of the company entitled the owner to be the shareholder of the exchange and also gave him a right to act as broker on the exchange.
15.
16. Investor’s interest was ignored as brokers were manipulating the market for their own advantage
17. Scams took place in pre-demutualization phase-1992- Harshad Mehta scam & 2001-Ketan Parekh Scam.
18. Lack of strict vigilance on the market-No one person or management was there to look after the affair of the exchange.So Indian market and financial sector felt the need of demutualisation.
19.
20.
21. Exchanges like BSE that were not even a corporate entity needed to be converted from “association of persons” to a Company limited by shares.
22.
23. In 2001, Finance minister pledged on the floor of the parliament to demutualise all Indian Exchanges
24. SEBI appointed Kania committee to look in to the various issues relating to Demutualisation including questions relating to broker ownership
48. Either by becoming trading arms of BSE & NSE, or
49. Number of regional stock exchange joins hands to make a separate platform
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57. So we see that the turnover increases at faster rate after May, 2005. But in the pre-demutualisation phase there is not any fixed trend in the turnover. Sometime the figure is increasing and sometime it is diminishing. Therefore we can conclude that the performance of the Bombay Stock Exchange has revamped because of demutualisation.
58.
59. The same board and the same organizational structure will continue to exist and nothing much will be achieved
60. The government can not solve the exchange’s management problem by steering the demutualisation process