We describe the Harvard Extension School's ALM in Mathematics for Teaching program and in detail two courses taught in an inquiry-based learning (IBL) style
Two non-traditional content courses for in-service high school teachers at the Harvard Extension School
1. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Two non-traditional content courses for
in-service high school teachers at the
Harvard Extension School
Bret Benesh Thomas Judson Matthew Leingang
Harvard University
Department of Mathematics
Critical Issues in Education: Teaching Teachers Mathematics
Mathematical Sciences Research Institute
Berkeley, California
May 31, 2007
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
2. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
On Deck
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
3. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
On Deck
The Harvard Extension
School’s Master of
Liberal Arts (ALM) in
Mathematics for
Teaching
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
4. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
On Deck
The Harvard Extension
School’s Master of
Liberal Arts (ALM) in
Mathematics for
Teaching
Geometry and
Probability courses
taught this year
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
5. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
On Deck
The Harvard Extension
School’s Master of
Liberal Arts (ALM) in
Mathematics for
Teaching
Geometry and
Probability courses
taught this year
Evaluations and
Reflections
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
6. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Outline
Theme
The ALM Program
1
Class Details
Rationale for the courses
2 Probability
Instructors’ background Evaluation
4
Goals Questions
Results
Implementation
3
Geometry Conclusions
5
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
7. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
History and Purpose of ALM Program
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
8. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
History and Purpose of ALM Program
Paul Sally’s Seminars
for Elementary
Specialists and
Mathematics Educators
(SESAME)
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
9. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
History and Purpose of ALM Program
Paul Sally’s Seminars
for Elementary
Specialists and
Mathematics Educators
(SESAME)
Meet state standards
for mathematics content
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
10. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
History and Purpose of ALM Program
Paul Sally’s Seminars
for Elementary
Specialists and
Mathematics Educators
(SESAME)
Meet state standards
for mathematics content
In-service secondary
school teachers and
people considering
career change
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
11. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Whom are we teaching?
In-service teachers come from all kinds of Boston area schools:
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
12. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Whom are we teaching?
In-service teachers come from all kinds of Boston area schools:
from Boston Latin
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
13. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Whom are we teaching?
In-service teachers come from all kinds of Boston area schools:
from Boston Latin
to Boston Public
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
14. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Description of ALM Program Requirements
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
15. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Description of ALM Program Requirements
Students must take 10
courses, up through
one year of calculus
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
16. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Description of ALM Program Requirements
Students must take 10
courses, up through
one year of calculus
One of the courses
must be on pedagogy
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
17. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Description of ALM Program Requirements
Students must take 10
courses, up through
one year of calculus
One of the courses
must be on pedagogy
Students must
complete a master’s
thesis
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
18. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
ALM Courses
“Standardquot; math courses (calculus, discrete math, etc.)
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
19. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
ALM Courses
“Standardquot; math courses (calculus, discrete math, etc.)
Courses designed for the secondary school teacher
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
20. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
ALM Courses
“Standardquot; math courses (calculus, discrete math, etc.)
Courses designed for the secondary school teacher
Math E-300 Math for Teaching Arithmetic
Math E-301 Math for Teaching Number Theory
Math E-302 Math for Teaching Geometry
Math E-303 Math for Teaching Algebra
Math E-304 Inquiries into Probability and Combinatorics
Math E-306 Theory and Practice of Teaching Statistics
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
21. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Instructors’ background
Implementation
Goals
Evaluation
Conclusions
Outline
Theme
The ALM Program
1
Class Details
Rationale for the courses
2 Probability
Instructors’ background Evaluation
4
Goals Questions
Results
Implementation
3
Geometry Conclusions
5
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
22. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Instructors’ background
Implementation
Goals
Evaluation
Conclusions
Bret’s background
What living in Madison can do to you
Graduate work was in finite group theory
Minored in math education
KTI Program
Core Plus and Connected Mathematics Project (CMP)
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
23. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Instructors’ background
Implementation
Goals
Evaluation
Conclusions
Matt’s background
How on Earth did I get so jaded?
Geometer by training, teacher by trade
Third time through a probability course for teachers
First time: team taught, disconnected
Second time: interesting for me, over their head
Third time: ???
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
24. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Instructors’ background
Implementation
Goals
Evaluation
Conclusions
Goals for Math E-302
“Math for Teaching Geometry”
Maximize student learning
Improve communication skills
Motivate students
Provide a classroom model
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
25. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Instructors’ background
Implementation
Goals
Evaluation
Conclusions
Goals for Math E-304
“Inquiries into Probability and Combinatorics”
Build a discipline from the ground up
Teach students what they’re ready to learn
Develop ability to read, write, and criticize mathematical
arguments
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
26. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Outline
Theme
The ALM Program
1
Class Details
Rationale for the courses
2 Probability
Instructors’ background Evaluation
4
Goals Questions
Results
Implementation
3
Geometry Conclusions
5
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
27. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Platform for inquiry
Taxicab geometry
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
28. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Platform for inquiry
Taxicab geometry
Compare and contrast
with Euclidean
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
29. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Class Format
Meet once per week
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
30. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Class Format
Meet once per week
Class length is two hours
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
31. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Class Format
Meet once per week
Class length is two hours
Mostly in-service high school teachers
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
32. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Role of Instructor
Moderate discussion
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
33. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Role of Instructor
Moderate discussion
Referee
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
34. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Role of Instructor
Moderate discussion
Referee
Ask questions
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
35. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Role of Instructor
Moderate discussion
Referee
Ask questions
Not an authority
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
36. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical day
Review
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
37. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical day
Review
Work on one problem
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
38. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical day
Review
Work on one problem
10% lecture
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
39. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical day
Review
Work on one problem
10% lecture
45% small group work
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
40. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical day
Review
Work on one problem
10% lecture
45% small group work
45% large group discussion
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
41. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical problem
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
42. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical problem
What is the definition of a
circle in Euclidean geometry?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
43. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical problem
What is the definition of a
circle in Euclidean geometry?
What does a circle look like in
taxicab geometry?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
44. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical problem
What is the definition of a
circle in Euclidean geometry?
What does a circle look like in
taxicab geometry?
What is the diameter of a
circle in taxicab geometry?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
45. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical problem
What is the definition of a
circle in Euclidean geometry?
What does a circle look like in
taxicab geometry?
What is the diameter of a
circle in taxicab geometry?
What is the circumference in
taxicab geometry?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
46. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical problem
What is the definition of a
circle in Euclidean geometry?
What does a circle look like in
taxicab geometry?
What is the diameter of a
circle in taxicab geometry?
What is the circumference in
taxicab geometry?
What is π in taxicab
geometry?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
47. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Another example
A New Altitude
A = 1 (2.3)(8.5) = 9.775
2
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
48. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Grading
Mostly papers
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
49. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Grading
Mostly papers
Two exams
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
50. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Grading
Mostly papers
Two exams
Class participation
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
51. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Probability course by the Moore Method
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
52. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Probability course by the Moore Method
No textbooks at all; I
write problems directed
towards the course
objectives
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
53. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Probability course by the Moore Method
No textbooks at all; I
write problems directed
towards the course
objectives
Students submit written
up problems
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
54. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Probability course by the Moore Method
No textbooks at all; I
write problems directed
towards the course
objectives
Students submit written
up problems
Students present
solutions
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
55. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Probability course by the Moore Method
No textbooks at all; I
write problems directed
towards the course
objectives
Students submit written
up problems
Students present
solutions
I update notes with
solutions
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
56. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Notes Table of Contents
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
57. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Notes Table of Contents
The Fundamental
Counting Principle
with without
er ne
Pr W n
ov hiz
er ne
Wn
z
hi
a
a
Am olo
ic
Am olo
ic
ov
Pr
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
58. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Notes Table of Contents
The Fundamental
Counting Principle A A
D B B D
Permutations
C C
A A
B B
C C
D D
A A
D D
C C
B B
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
59. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Notes Table of Contents
The Fundamental
Counting Principle
1
Permutations
1 1
Combinations
1 2 1
3 3
1 1
6
1 4 4 1
5 10 10 5
1 1
6 15 20 15 6
1 1
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
60. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Notes Table of Contents
The Fundamental
Counting Principle
Permutations
B
Combinations
Set theory
A C
A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪ B)∩(A ∪ C)
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
61. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Notes Table of Contents
The Fundamental
Counting Principle
Permutations
B
Combinations
Set theory
A C
Axioms of probability
A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪ B)∩(A ∪ C)
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
62. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Notes Table of Contents
The Fundamental
Counting Principle
Permutations
B
Combinations
Set theory
A C
Axioms of probability
Expected value
A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪ B)∩(A ∪ C)
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
63. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Notes Table of Contents
The Fundamental
Counting Principle
Permutations
Combinations
Set theory
Axioms of probability
Expected value
Conditional probability
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
64. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Notes Table of Contents
The Fundamental
Counting Principle
Permutations
Combinations
Set theory
Axioms of probability
Expected value
Conditional probability
Famous probability
distributions
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
65. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Fun problems
Give them a menu; ask
how many combination
plates can be ordered
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
66. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Fun problems
Give them a menu; ask
how many combination
plates can be ordered
Verify the published
probabilities for winning
various lottery games
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
67. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Fun problems
Give them a menu; ask
how many combination
plates can be ordered
Verify the published
probabilities for winning
various lottery games
Why can we multiply
probabilities of
“consecutive” events?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
68. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
A typical day
I will have assigned a chapter’s worth of problems
I solicit volunteers to present
We watch and question the presenters
I stay seated (referee)
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
69. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Geometry
Implementation
Probability
Evaluation
Conclusions
Grading
≥ 1 problem written per week, 0-4 scale
≥ 1 problem presented per week, 0-4 scale
Take-home final
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
70. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Outline
Theme
The ALM Program
1
Class Details
Rationale for the courses
2 Probability
Instructors’ background Evaluation
4
Goals Questions
Results
Implementation
3
Geometry Conclusions
5
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
71. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Questions
We surveyed the E-302 and
E-304 students.
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
72. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Questions
We surveyed the E-302 and
E-304 students.
Influence thinking,
teaching, or
communicating?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
73. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Questions
We surveyed the E-302 and
E-304 students.
Influence thinking,
teaching, or
communicating?
Learn more than
traditional format?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
74. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Questions
We surveyed the E-302 and
E-304 students.
Influence thinking,
teaching, or
communicating?
Learn more than
traditional format?
Challenging?
Rewarding?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
75. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Questions
We surveyed the E-302 and
E-304 students.
Influence thinking,
teaching, or
communicating?
Learn more than
traditional format?
Challenging?
Rewarding?
Take another class?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
76. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Questions
We surveyed the E-302 and
E-304 students.
Influence thinking,
teaching, or
communicating?
Learn more than
traditional format?
Challenging?
Rewarding?
Take another class?
Recommend class
format?
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
77. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
The results: Question 1
How has this course affected the way you think about
mathematics?
5=Very positively
4=Somewhat positively
3=No change
2=Somewhat negatively
1=Very negatively
µ = 4.21
prob
geom µ = 4.3
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
78. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
The results: Question 1
How has this course affected the way you think about
mathematics?
5=Very positively
4=Somewhat positively
3=No change
2=Somewhat negatively
1=Very negatively
µ = 4.21
prob
geom µ = 4.3
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
79. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Question 2
How has this course affected the way you think about teaching
mathematics?
5=Very positively
4=Somewhat positively
3=No change
2=Somewhat negatively
1=Very negatively
µ = 4.12
prob
geom µ = 3.9
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
80. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Question 3
How has this course affected the way you think about
communicating in mathematics?
5=Very positively
4=Somewhat positively
3=No change
2=Somewhat negatively
1=Very negatively
µ = 4.07
prob
geom µ = 4.15
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
81. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Question 4
Do you think that you learned more, less, or as much as you
would have in a more traditionally taught course?
5=Much, much more
4=A little more than usual
3=No change in learning
2=A little less than usual
1=A lot less than usual
µ = 3.78
prob
geom µ = 3.38
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
82. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Question 5
How challenging is this course?
3=Very challenging. I had to think much harder than I
normally do.
2=Sort of challenging.
1=Not challenging at all. I could do this in my sleep.
µ = 2.21
prob
geom µ = 2.3
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
83. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Question 6
How rewarding is this course?
4=Ridiculously rewarding. Math is more fun than watching
Dancing with the Stars!
3=Sort of rewarding
2=I don’t get anything out of it
1=I feel like this class saps my will to live.
µ = 3.14
prob
geom µ = 3.28
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
84. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Question 7
Would you like to take another course taught in this format?
5=Yes! Where do I sign up?!?
4=Yes, with some reservation
3=Undecided
2=No
1=Hell no
µ = 3.85
prob
geom µ = 4.17
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
85. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Question 8
Would you recommend a course taught in this format?
5=Yes! I want to share the love!
4=Sure, it was pretty good.
3=Undecided
2=No.
1=Yes, but only to my worst enemy.
µ =4
prob
geom µ = 4.15
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
86. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Some quotes from the probability class
“I have always found proofs difficult and intimidating. Now I
feel more comfortable with them.”
“Either a problem is challenging/hard, or it is easy and the
challenge is explaining it well. Either way, it is challenging.”
“...it’s really the best way to learn math.”
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
87. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
More quotes from the probability class
“I think a little more teacher-based instruction would allow
for a more rigorous pace, which pushes students and can
lead to more of a need for interaction and discussion by
necessity.”
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
88. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
More quotes from the probability class
“I think a little more teacher-based instruction would allow
for a more rigorous pace, which pushes students and can
lead to more of a need for interaction and discussion by
necessity.”
“Waiting for the other students to finish is a bit of a waste of
time.”
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
89. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
More quotes from the probability class
“I think a little more teacher-based instruction would allow
for a more rigorous pace, which pushes students and can
lead to more of a need for interaction and discussion by
necessity.”
“Waiting for the other students to finish is a bit of a waste of
time.”
“I don’t necessarily like the experience, but at least it was
pedagogically interesting.”
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
90. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Some quotes from the geometry class
“I see more value in working in groups as an ongoing
strategy [for teaching]. It takes a while to build trust, but
once its established the outcome in class thinking is
fantastic!”
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
91. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Some quotes from the geometry class
“I see more value in working in groups as an ongoing
strategy [for teaching]. It takes a while to build trust, but
once its established the outcome in class thinking is
fantastic!”
“I have thought more about this ‘stuff’ than I have thought
on other courses.”
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
92. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Some quotes from the geometry class
“I see more value in working in groups as an ongoing
strategy [for teaching]. It takes a while to build trust, but
once its established the outcome in class thinking is
fantastic!”
“I have thought more about this ‘stuff’ than I have thought
on other courses.”
“It is tiring to think this hard consistently, but good still.”
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
93. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Some quotes from the geometry class
“I see more value in working in groups as an ongoing
strategy [for teaching]. It takes a while to build trust, but
once its established the outcome in class thinking is
fantastic!”
“I have thought more about this ‘stuff’ than I have thought
on other courses.”
“It is tiring to think this hard consistently, but good still.”
“I wish there was more concrete learning.”
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
94. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Questions
Implementation
Results
Evaluation
Conclusions
Some quotes from the geometry class
“I see more value in working in groups as an ongoing
strategy [for teaching]. It takes a while to build trust, but
once its established the outcome in class thinking is
fantastic!”
“I have thought more about this ‘stuff’ than I have thought
on other courses.”
“It is tiring to think this hard consistently, but good still.”
“I wish there was more concrete learning.”
“I leave excited and bewildered.”
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
95. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Outline
Theme
The ALM Program
1
Class Details
Rationale for the courses
2 Probability
Instructors’ background Evaluation
4
Goals Questions
Results
Implementation
3
Geometry Conclusions
5
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
96. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Reflections
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
97. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Reflections
Costs/benefits of IBL
methods vs. lecturing
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
98. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Reflections
Costs/benefits of IBL
methods vs. lecturing
Different kind of drama
with a TMM course
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
99. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Reflections
Costs/benefits of IBL
methods vs. lecturing
Different kind of drama
with a TMM course
The challenge of
involving weaker
students
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
100. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Reflections
Costs/benefits of IBL
methods vs. lecturing
Different kind of drama
with a TMM course
The challenge of
involving weaker
students
Reactions to the final
exam
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
101. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Final Thoughts
Please let us know about research into effectiveness of IBL
(or analogous) methods
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
102. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Final Thoughts
Please let us know about research into effectiveness of IBL
(or analogous) methods
ALM URL:
http://www.extension.harvard.edu/math/
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers
103. The ALM Program
Rationale for the courses
Implementation
Evaluation
Conclusions
Final Thoughts
Please let us know about research into effectiveness of IBL
(or analogous) methods
ALM URL:
http://www.extension.harvard.edu/math/
Great thanks to the Educational Advancement Foundation
for support
Bret Benesh, Thomas Judson, Matthew Leingang Non-traditional content courses for in-service teachers