These slides have been produced to support people who wish to deliver a Wikipedia editing session for new users. The slides support use of slides for a Wikipedia Editing Session (available at #http://www.slideshare.net/lisbk/wikipedia-editing-session) and explain how the slides can be used and tailored.

1. Wikipedia Editing:
Training the Trainer
Brian Kelly
Innovation Advocate
Cetis
University of Bolton
Bolton, UK
Contact Details
Email: ukwebfocus@gmail.com
Twitter: @briankelly
Cetis Web site: http://www.cetis.ac.uk/
Blog: http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/
1
Slides and further information available at http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/
events/lilac-2014-information-literacy-wikipedia-edit-a-thon/
Slides prepared as a contingency
for an Wikipedia edit-a-thon session
to be held at LILAC 2014

2. Abstract
Abstract
You know about editing Wikipedia articles, including the
technical aspects and the Wikipedia culture.
This session will describe approaches for developing
and delivering a Wikipedia training session for new
Wikipedia users.
The session will provide a case study based on the
approaches taken for the Wikipedia workshop sessions
at the LILAC 2014 conference.
2
Acknowledgements: these slides are based on experiences in
planning and delivering Wikipedia editing sessions with Tony Sant,
Nancy Graham and Andrew Gray.

3. Topics
Approaches to the following aspects:
• Registration
• Creating a Wikipedia profile
• Editing existing articles
• Creating new articles
• What can go wrong?
• Conforming with Wikipedia principles
• Running a Wikipedia Edit-a-thon
• Useful resources
• Question time and discussion
3
The Wikipedia Editing
session
The Wikipedia
Edit-a-thon session
BasicEditing

4. Case Study 1
Based on one-hour workshop at
• Wikipedia Editing Workshop at SpotOn 2013
conference
• Abstract and resources available at
http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/events/
spoton-2013-wikipedia-editing-workshop/
• Report at http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2013/11/
11/facilitating-a-wikipedia-editing-session-the-solo13-
experience/
• Storify summary at
http://storify.com/briankelly/wikipedia-editing-
workshop-at-spoton-2013
Formed the basis of the session at the LILAC 2014
conference
4
BasicEditing
Case study 1:
Basic editing

5. About the SpotOn Session
Aims:
To ensure that science researchers (with own devices)
created a Wikipedia account & user profile and could discuss
use of Wikipedia for scientific researchers in an hour
Numbers: About 15-20 researchers/science communicators
Concerns and Solutions:
Room not conducive to collaboration!
Chairs moved into circles before session started.
Would the WiFi work (firewalls, bandwidth, …)?
Screenshots and discussions planned.
Would session aims be achievable in time?
Try it and see!
Would participants find the session useful?
Realtime evaluation by encouraging use of Twitter
5
BasicEditing
Case study 1:
Basic editing

6. Structure of Workshop
Structure of hour-long session:
• About the session including Why
Wikipedia is important; About the
facilitators & participants: 4 slides
6
BasicEditing
Some had edited articles;
some had created an account
in advance but others hadn’t

7. Structure of Workshop
Structure of hour-long session:
• About the session
• Creating an account: 1 slide.
Now login and do it! (not needed for
some, so some moved on to next part,
creating or editing user profile based
on existing profiles)
7
BasicEditing
Case study 1:
Basic editing

8. Structure of Workshop
Structure of hour-long session:
• About the session
• Creating an account
• Creating a user profile: 4 slides
Now create a profile using plain text
8
BasicEditing

9. Structure of Workshop
Structure of hour-long session
• About the session
• Creating an account
• Creating a user profile
• Wikimedia syntax (formatting,
headings and links): 1 slide
Now improve your profile; feel
free to reuse ideas for profiles
we’ve shown. Slide left on
screen during exercise.
9
BasicEditing
Case study 1:
Basic editing

10. Structure of Workshop
Structure of hour-long session
• About the session
• Creating an account
• Creating a user profile
• Wikimedia syntax (formatting,
headings and links)
• Next steps (adding metadata and
finding pages to be improved): 4 slides
10
BasicEditing

11. Structure of Workshop
Structure of hour-long session
• About the session
• Creating an account
• Creating a user profile
• Basic Wikimedia syntax (formatting,
headings and links)
• Next steps (adding metadata and
finding pages to be improved)
• Further information (relevant to
context): 5 slides
11
BasicEditing

12. Structure of Workshop
Structure of hour-long session
• About the session
• Creating an account
• Creating a user profile
• Basic Wikimedia syntax (formatting,
headings and links)
• Next steps (adding metadata and finding
pages to be improved)
• Further information (relevant to context)
• Creating new articles and Wikipedia
principles: 5 slides
By now participants should have created
content. Can now discuss the theory.
12
BasicEditing

13. Structure of Workshop
Structure of hour-long session
• About the session
• Creating an account
• Creating a user profile
• Wikimedia syntax (formatting, headings
and links)
• Next steps (adding metadata and finding
pages to be improved)
• Further information (relevant to context)
• Creating new articles and Wikipedia
principles
• About the Wikimedia Foundation and
other Wikimedia projects: 4 slides
Slides prepared in case of technical
problems or if time and interest
13
BasicEditing

14. Structure of Workshop
Structure of hour-long session
• About the session
• Creating an account
• Creating a user profile
• Wikimedia syntax (formatting, headings
and links)
• Next steps (adding metadata and finding
pages to be improved)
• Further information (relevant to context)
• Creating new articles and Wikipedia
principles
• About the Wikimedia Foundation and
other Wikimedia projects
• Important but confusions syntax
(references) and conclusions: 2 slides
14
BasicEditing
Case study 1:
Basic editing

15. Feedback
Approaches:
• Live tweeting encouraged
• Photos welcomed
• Storify summary of tweets
• Helped to gain feedback
and monitor timings
15
Timings of tweets:
14.30-15.30 Workshop
14.30-14.58 Interests described
14.49- User profiles published
BasicEditing
Case study 1:
Basic editing

16. Behind The Scenes
What we did to minimise risks:
• Asked people to create Wikipedia account in
advance (as only six new accounts can be created
from same IP address in a 24 hour period)
• Included annotated screenshots of key pages
• Support of experienced Wikipedia expert
• Focus on editing, with discussions at end and
when relevant issues raised
16
BasicEditing
Questions:
• What other possible problems might be (or have
been) encountered?
• How would you respond to such problems?

17. Case Study 2
Based on plans for 1.5 hour-long workshop:
• Wikipedia Edit-a-thon Workshop at LILAC 2014
• We currently don’t know if the plans will work!
17
The workshop leaders will then provide basic training on editing Wikipedia
and participants will set up a Wikipedia account and undertake some small
edits to improve their confidence. The group will also be shown how to
contribute to the Talk page and begin online discussions with other editors.
Finally participants will then be set into small groups and with guidance from
the workshop leaders will begin editing small sections of the Information
Literacy page, making improvements to the current structure and content.
Intended outcomes:
• Improved knowledge of Wikipedia and in particular the Information
Literacy page
• Gaining skills and confidence in editing Wikipedia
• Small improvements to the IL Wikipedia page
• Start of online discussion about the Information Literacy page
Editi-a-thon
Case study 2:
An edit-a-thon

18. Information Literacy Wikipedia article
The Information Literacy Wikipedia article at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_literacy
18
Encouragement to
improve article
Article has a US bias
Edit-a-thon

19. Case Study 2: Plans
Options for an edit-a-thon session at LILAC 2014:
• Participants to improve existing random articles
• Create new articles based on participant’s
personal interests
• Create new article(s) based on participant’s
shared interests
• Edit an existing article
19
What we felt:
• Wikipedia is about collaborative work
• LILAC participants will have shared interests in
information literacy
• We should seek to collaboratively edit a relevant
Wikipedia article
Edit-a-thon
Case study 2:
An edit-a-thon

20. Information Literacy Talk Page
Plans to inform the
community of
intentions to update
IL article to be
shared on talk page
20

21. Using the Talk Page
21
Existing
suggestions (in
Jan 2014):
• Info about
LILAC
conferences
• Significant
overhaul of
article
Case study 2:
An edit-a-thon

22. Using The Talk Page
22
My signature
Announcing intention to add
(significant) new content /
section.
Edit-a-thon
Case study 2:
An edit-a-thon

23. Dangers of Edit Conflicts
Human protocols to minimise edit conflicts at edit-a-
thons? 23
Case study 2:
An edit-a-thon

24. Monitoring the Talk Page
Set up a
Watch list for
the ‘Talk’
page (rather
than Article
page)
24
Case study 2:
An edit-a-thon

25. Possible Options
Aim:
To update the IL
Wikipedia article with
information about UK
perspectives on IL
Approaches:
• Create new section in
article
• Inform IL community of
plans on Talk page
• Agree on sub-sections
and core text with IL
community
• Create as a draft article
• Publish at LILAC 2014
• Update (including new
sub-sections) at
Wikipedia session
25
Case study 2:
An edit-a-thon

26. What We Did
We:
• Decided to focus on
IL in the UK
• Agreed on an
appropriate
structure for a new
article
• Created the
structure
• Used section
headings to
minimise edit
conflicts
• Delivered the
workshop 26

27. Case Study 2: Draft Timetable
Outline timetable for the edit-a-thon 27
Timing Section Activity
5 mins Introduction Facilitator gives talk
10 mins Show IL page ALL talking and demonstrating structure of section and what is
problematic about it. Also talk about the Edit and Talk pages to show
the pattern of edits etc.
10 mins Show proposed IL
in the UK
structure
Facilitator to explain why editing current IL page is problematic at
this stage.
Facilitator to explain that proposed structure is indicative and that
groups need to discuss this and come up with agreed sections.
5 mins Organise groups Facilitator and others to appoint 5 or 6 groups (depending on
numbers) around the room
10 mins Group discussion
on new sections
Groups to look at new structure and discuss if the headings are
relevant and what content should go in them.
Groups to use IL website, UNESCO document page for UK and other
sources to help them to find content and links.
5-10 mins Feedback Facilitator to take notes on what changes have been agreed by
groups.
30 mins Group work Groups to work on adding content to each section including text, links
and images.
10 mins Feedback and see
where we are
Facilitator to round up what has been achieved in group session and
ask about demand for future edit-a-thons around the UK
Edit-a-thon
Case study 2:
An edit-a-thon

28. Further Plans
We have described approaches for collaborative editing of an article of
shared interest
But what if some participants :
• Prefer to work on their own
• Prefer to master editing basics before editing a live article
• Don’t have an interest in the topic
Or something goes wrong with access to the article e.g.
• Article is locked (cf. Margaret Thatcher article)
• Access to page is not available
• Community disagrees with update plans; …)
• No network access available!
28
Edit-a-thon
Additional approaches taken:
• Additional related articles identified
• Links provided to pages which have been flagged for updating
• Discussion group exercises planned
What else could be done?

29. Basic Wikipedia Training (1)
https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/
Basic_Wikipedia_training
29
AdditionalResources

30. Basic Wikipedia Training (2)
https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/
Basic_Wikipedia_training
30
AdditionalResources

31. Basic Wikipedia Training (3)
Useful to ensure examples and context is relevant to participants
interests (e.g. science researchers; librarians; …) 31
AdditionalResources

32. Advanced Approaches to Training
Further areas which could be covered (in a longer session)
Content:
• References
• Templates: how to use; how to create
• WikiMedia Commons: how to upload; how to use
• …
Training environment:
• SysAdmin privileges
• Templates: templates for training courses e.g. used
in Queen Victoria Diaries edit-a-thon:
{{QueenVic}}
32
AdditionalResources

33. Questions
Any questions, comments, …?

34. This presentation, “Wikipedia Editing: Training the Trainer” by Brian
Kelly, Cetis is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International Licence
Note the licence covers most of the text in this presentation. Images may
have other licence conditions. Where possible links are provided to the
source of images so that licence conditions can be found.
34
Slides and further information available at
http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/events/lilac-2014-information-literacy-
wikipedia-edit-a-thon/
Licence and Additional Resources