1. Multimodal Chronic Pain
Treatment
New Directions
N. Lee Smith MD
Center for MindBody Health
Director, Stress Medicine
Omega Pain Clinic and Lifetree Clinical Research
Salt Lake City, Utah
2.
3. Focus
• Acute vs Chronic Pain
• Nociceptive vs Neuropathic vs Central
• The common role of central sensitization
– Prototype: Fibromyalgia
• Multimodality treatment:
– How to reduce opiates with good relief?
• Myofascial Trigger Points
4. Acute pain = a symptom
Chronic pain = a disease
If acute pain goes under-treated,
more chronic pain
5. Chronic post-surgical pain
• Thoracotomy 50-60%
• Amputation 50%
• Breast surgery 33%
• Inguinal hernia 30%
• C-section 12%
Why?
And who is more likely?
How to prevent this?
6. Pain Treatment:
How are we doing?
“Pain can be relieved effectively
in 90% of patients, but is not
relieved effectively in 80% of
patients”
Walco, New Engl J Med 1994;331:8
Chronic pain is often misunderstood
7. Acute pain is often
inadequately treated:
Why?
• Fear of opiods: MD
– 1/2 of fractures receive them
– 42% come to ER for pain:
• 3/4 leave in moderate to severe pain
• Patient fears: 3/4 prefer non-opiate
8.
9. What percent of
chronic pain patients say,
“Opiates give me little or no
pain relief”?
53%
American Pain Foundation Survey 2007
10. Distinguishing different types of pain
Nociceptive Neuropathic
Central Caused by nerve
Caused by
tissue damage
Snsitization lesion or dysfunction
• Arthritis
• Fibromyalgia • Painful Diabetes
• Injuries
• Low back pain • Shingles, PHN
• Postoperative pain
• Neck pain • Sciatica
• Trigeminal neuralgia
11. Pain Distribution
• Use a body pain
diagram
• Have a patient color
all areas of the body in
which they feel pain
Adapted from pain drawing provided courtesy of L Bateman.
Back Front
23. Neurotransmission
Issues
Inhibitory tracts
(NE, DA, 5HT)
When inhibition is
lacking, the
nervous system
hypersensitizes
SP
24. CSF Substance P in FMS
45
40
35
30
25
Normals
20 FMS
15
10
5
0
Vaeroy Russell Welin Bradley
25. Fibromyalgia: Pain Processing Disorder
fMRI Evidence: Augmentation
fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Gracely et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:1333-1343.
26. FMS: Neurotransmission
Abnormalities (in CSF)
• Low central serotonin function
}
⇒ deep sleep loss, anxiety)
• Low central norepinephrine function
⇒ fatigue, pain, cognition ADs
• Low dopamine function
⇒ ↓attention, ↓pleasure, ↓ sex, RLS
}
• High Substance P
⇒ pain amplification ACs
• High Glutamate
Russell J Arth Rheum 1994;37:1543-1560
27. Pharmacological
Targets for
Treatment Deep sleep
Antidepressants
(NRIs)
Tramadol Inhibitory tracts
Tapentadol (NE, DA & 5HT) Dopamine
agonists
NSAIDs
If present: Anticonvulsants,
trigger SP neural stabilizers
points?
28. Grading Pain Severity
For example
• Nuisance: after exercise aches
• Distracting: menstrual cramps, OA,
finger burn residual
• Disabling: migraine, toothache
• Worst Possible: labor, severe burns, kidney stone
50%
30%
0___1____2____3____4_____5____6____7____8_____9___10
nuisancedistracting disabling worst
29. Neuropathic Pain:
>50% Reduction
7
6
5 Na ACs(CBP,OXC)
Number 4 TCAs
needed Tramadol
to treat 3 Ca ACs(PGB,GBP)
SNRIs(dulox,venla)
2 SSRIs
1
0
Na+ TCAs Tram Ca++ SNRIs SSRIs
ACs ACs Gilron et al. CMAJ 2006;175(3)
Cochrane Database SR
2006;3:CD003726
30. Anticonvulsants:
Neural stabilizers
• Sodium channel block (e.g., divalproex, lamotrigene)
• Calcium channel modulation (e.g.,pregabalin, gabapentin)
• GABA enhancers (e.g., tiagabine, baclofen)
These ↓ Glutamate release
Using meds with complementary mechanisms in lower
dose may be better than high doses of one mechanism
31. Positive Pharmacological Trials
for Fibromyalgia
• Anticonvulsants: Pregabalin (30% get 50% improvement)
• Dual action “antidepressants”: (30-40% get 50% improved)
– Milnacipran, Duloxetine, Venlafaxine
– Tricyclics (about 1/3 improve with low dose)
– Cyclobenzaprine (10-30 mg)
– Tramadol (28% reduction)
• Dopamine agonists: (75% improve; about 40% get 50% improv.)
• Gamma hydroxybuyrate (GHB) (30% get 50% improvement)
Usually, these are used in combination
32. SNRIs for Pain
• Duloxetine
– FDA indicated in four types of pain
• Minacipran
– For fibromyalgia
– More NE than serotonin
33. Tricyclics for Pain
• Second generation: more NE; fewer side effects
– nortriptylene
– desipramine
– cyclobenzaprine: better deep sleep (in low dose)
34. Opiates in Neuropathic Pain
Meta-analysis of 22 studies (n=521)
• Intermediate term (1+ months):
– VAS reduction from placebo = 1.4 / 10
– No reduction in disability or mental health scores
• In all but one study
• Short term: Sometimes helpful
(contradictory results )
Eisenberg E. JAMA 2005;293:3043-3052
One opiate is FDA-approved for neuropathic pain: tapentadol
35. How to tell if opiate responsive?
(Note well: Function)
• Good initial response: use long acting opiod
– Should be dose responsive
• If poorly responsive after 2-3 titrations:
Initiate an escape strategy
• If initially partially responsive (“Taking the
edge off”: change opiate,
and other factors need addressing
– Strongly consider an antihyperalgesic opiate
36. Two Anti-hyperalgesic Opiates:
• Buprenorphine
– Unique receptor profile
– Patch = different dosing than SL
• Tapentadol
– Weak opiate + NRI
– Indicated for both chronic pain and neuropathic pain
These two appear to have less abuse potential
45. Myofascial Pain
Syndrome: Treatment
1. Inactivation of trigger points
• Injection of local anesthetic (lidocaine + bipuvicaine)
– Precision in placement of the needle a the point of maximal
tenderness is essential
– A local “twitch response” is usually obtained
⇒Followed by vigorous massage and stretching
47. Myofascial Pain Syndrome:
Treatment- Prevention
3. Control of contributing factors:
• Mechanical: Correct repetitive, tensing movements
– Posture and lifting improvement
• Aerobic exercise
• Stress resilience:
– Treat anxiety and depression
– Experiential cognitive behavioral resilience training
48. Who is likely to get chronic pain if
acute pain treatment is suboptimal ?
• Personal or family history of
CNS hypersensitivity disorders
– and sleep problems
• History of abuse, trauma or childhood neglect
high CRF and sympathetic tone
For surgery in these, consider
pre-emptive analgesia
50. Which Medication to Start?
• Depends on dominant patterns of problems:
– Sleep + pain + tingling + anxiety: Anticonvulsant
– Pain + depression/anxiety + fatigue + cognitive: NSRI
• R/O bipolar (Add sleep agent)
– Pain alone: tramadol or cyclobenzaprine?
– Fluctuating pain + mood/anxiety or anger:
Anticonvulsant (± Atypical neuroleptic)
Often, thoughtful combinations are best
51. Treating Chronic Pain Disorders
Five important parts (interdisciplinary):
• Treat early and aggressively
• Treat CNS neurochemical hypersensitizing issues
– Anticonvulsants (3 types), dual antidepressants,
DA and alpha-2 agonists
• Treat sleep well (particularly deep stages)
• Carefully paced exercise
• Treat “stress”: Experiential cognitive-behavioral methods
• Consider trigger points
• This reduces opiate requirements and improves function
52. Self Care Websites
OFFER
Organization for Fatigue and Fibromyalgia
Education and Research
http://www.offerutah.org/
University of Michigan Fibromyalgia Center
Dr. D. A. Williams and Dr. M. Carey
http://www.med.umich.edu/painresearch/patients/self.htm
55. Sleep Stages
Non REM REM
Benzos,
Some SSR Is,
Venlafaxine 4
Blocks
3
2
1
Body repair
56. Deep Sleep Effects
of CNS Medications
• Antidepressants
– Suppress:
most SSRIs (exceptions: sertraline, citalopram)
—Trend to
suppress: venlafaxine and bupropion
– Improve: amitriptylene, nortriptylene, doxepin
cyclobenzaprine, trazodone, mirtazepine
atypical neuroleptics (TCAs and 5HT2 blockers)
tiagabine
sodium oxybate (GHB)
pregabalin and gabapentin
Citera G. Clin Rheumatol
2000;19(1):9-13
57. Why More Pain
with Anxiety and Depression?
• Up-regulated pain sensory response
– Increased Substance P
– Low CNS serotonin and norepinephrine function
– Low endorphins
• Up-regulated inflammation
– Increased prostaglandins
– Excess immune stimulation ( IL-1, IL-6 & TNF & auto- Ab)
• Excess sympathetic tone
• Loss of deep stage sleep
Notas del editor
Most double-blind or single-blind studies investigating multimodal analgesia with a combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and opioid, with or without local anesthetic, show lower pain scores, a need for fewer analgesics, and prolongation of the time needed for postoperative analgesia compared with control groups. 1 Reference: 1. Jin F, Chung F. Multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain control. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13:524–539.
Chronic pain can be of mixed etiology with both nociceptive and neuropathic characteristics, as in some back pain conditions
Studies have demonstrated that patients with IBS have a heightened state of visceral sensitivity. 1 In 1980, Whitehead et al evaluated pain thresholds of a total of 25 IBS patients and 20 healthy controls. By distending a rectosigmoid balloon in a stepwise fashion, the investigators found that pain thresholds in IBS patients were significantly lower than in controls ( P <0.05). 2 Studies evaluating the pain thresholds of other GI disorders involving the esophagus 3 and stomach 4 have shown similar findings. References: 1. Ritchie J. Pain from distension of the pelvic colon by inflating a balloon in the irritable colon syndrome. Gut . 1973;14:125-132. 2. Whitehead WE, Engel BT, Schuster MM. Irritable bowel syndrome: physiological and psychological differences between diarrhea-predominant and constipation-predominant patients. Dig Dis Sci . 1980;25:6:404-413. 3. Richter JE, Barish CF, Castell DO. Abnormal sensory perception in patients with esophageal chest pain. Gastroenterology . October 1986;91:845-852. 4. Mearin F, Cucala M, Azpiroz F, Malagelada J-R. The origin of symptoms on the brain- gut axis in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology. October 1991;101:999-1006.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data provide supporting evidence that FM is a central pain disorder and demonstrate the presence of cortical/subcortical pain processing in FM. 1 fMRI was used to evaluate cerebral activation patterns during the application of painful pressure in FM patients (n=16) and controls (n=16) 1 Each patient underwent fMRI while pressure was applied to the thumbnail bed; 13 regions of increased brain activation were revealed in the FM group, compared with 1 in the control group 1 The graph depicts pain intensity against stimulus intensity. In FM patients, a low stimulus pressure produced a high pain level; however, in stimulus pressure controls, a similar pressure resulted in low levels of pain 1 Enhanced responses were noted in multiple areas of the brain, including somatosensory primary and secondary cortex, insula, putamen, and cerebellum; this provides supporting evidence that CNS alterations may underlie FM pathophysiology 1 Reference: 1. Gracely RH, Petzke F, Wolf JM, Clauw DJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of augmented pain processing in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum . 2002;46:1333-1343.