1. Will Thin Films win in India?
Madhavan Nampoothiri
December 13, 2011
Mumbai
2. Agenda
1. Introduction
2. How is Thin Film Technology doing in India ?
3. What is driving the growth?
4. What is the future outlook for Thin Films?
5. Conclusion
3. Agenda
1. Introduction
2. How is Thin Film Technology doing in India ?
3. What is driving the growth?
4. What is the future outlook for Thin Films?
5. Conclusion
4. Thin Films – From Niche to Mainstream
Global Thin Film market share
20% $500
-Thin film market share
increased when
18% 18% $450
polysilicon prices went
16% $400
up, and vice versa.
14% $350
13%
12%
13%
$300 - The decreasing price
10% 10% $250
differential with c-Si is
reducing cost
8% $200
8% competitiveness of TF
6% 6% $150
4% $100
2% $50
$70 $100 $250 $450 $70
$50
0% $-
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Average Polysilicon spot price $/kg Thin Films % Share
Souce : Analysis based on GTM Research, iSuppli, Photon International and other sources
5. PV production – c-Si dominates
2010 Cell production by Technology(MW-dc)
CIS/CIGS Thin film Si
426 1,339
5%
-c-Si has large market share
2%
CdTe
1,438
- In thin films, CdTe is the leader
Super
6% -a-Si not far behind
Monocrystallin - CIGS is makings its presence felt
e Si
Standard
920
Crystalline Si
4%
19,768
83%
Thin Film capacity in 2012(MW)
-China has significant Thin Film 3000
capacity 2500
2000
-Europe leads in Emerging technologies 1500
1000
- a-Si leads in production capacity 500
0
CdTe CIGS a-Si Emerging
Source: GTM Research
6. Agenda
1. Introduction
2. How is Thin Film Technology doing in
India ?
3. What is driving the growth?
4. What is the future outlook for Thin Films?
5. Conclusion
7. C-Si dominates in production….
• JNNSM target – 4 to 5 GW of PV production capacity by 2022
• Local content requirement in JNNSM(Phase 1)
– C-Si : and Modules to be made-in-India
– Thin films: No import restrictions
• No local content mandates in state policies
• C-Si Module manufacturing capacity ~ 1500 MW
• C-Si Cell manufacturing capacity ~ 600 MW
• Thin film manufacturing capacity – Negligible
– Moser Baer, Shurjo Energy and HHV Solar
8. ....but, Thin Film dominates in installations
Technology selection under JNNSM
120
Gujarat State policy
- 60-70% thin films
100
Installations in MS
80
60
40
20
0
Total IREDA NVVN
Type of scheme
C-Si Thin Films
-India bucks the global trend
- Thin films grabbed more than 60% market share
9. India – a good export market for global TF
companies
a-Si/μc-Si CIGS CdTe
Dupont USA MiaSolé USA First Solar USA
ECD/Uni-solar USA Q-Cells(Solibro) Germany Abound Solar USA
Masdar PV Germany SolarFrontier Japan
NexPower China
Schott Solar Germany
Sharp Japan
T-Solar Spain
Note: The above is a partial list of TF companies in India
-CdTe very popular, First Solar has high market share
- a-Si, despite lower efficiencies, have seen lot of companies coming
-CIGS also has takers
10. Agenda
1. Introduction
2. How is Thin Film Technology doing in India ?
3. What is driving the growth?
4. What is the future outlook for Thin Films?
5. Conclusion
11. Growth Drivers
Technology
-Temperature
coefficient
-Spectral response
Cost
Financing
- Lower module - Ease of
cost financing
- Inexpensive land
through
EXIM/ECB route
12. 1. How is Thin Film Technology doing in India?
3. What is driving the growth?
a. Technology
4. What could happen?
13. Thin Film Vs c-Si
Advantages Disadvantages
• Temperature coefficient • Conversion efficiencies
• Better performance under • Area requirement
diffuse light conditions • Higher BOS requirement
• Higher Energy Yield • Breakage
• Faster energy payback • Aging behavior not known
• Module grounding not • Materials shortage/toxicity
required for frameless
modules
14. Temperature coefficient – The TF USP..
Efficiency drop at elevated temperatures
14%
13%
12%
Cconversion efficiency
11%
10%
9%
8%
7%
6%
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Temperature(Deg C)
a-Si CdTe CIGS C-Si(Mono) c-Si(Multi)
- Efficiencies at STC(25 Deg C) is misleading, since that is rare in India
- c-Si loses efficiencies faster
- Higher energy yield during peak season
15. Spectral response - Another differentiator
• Ability to absorb more light in the spectrum, especially
junction a-Si
• Better performance under diffuse light Lesser shading effect
• Higher energy yield
16. The result : Higher energy yield for TF
Source: GTM Research
- TF consistently generating more electricity
17. 1. How is Thin Film Technology doing in India?
3. What is driving the growth?
b. Costs
4. What could happen?
18. Module cost : C-Si closing in, but TF still
maintains some advantage.
Spot price(Euro/Wp)
2.05
1.85
1.65
1.45
Euro/Wp
1.25
1.05
0.85
0.65
Avg C-Si(Germany) Avg C-Si(Japan/Korea) Avg c-Si(China/Taiwan)
CdTe Silicon Tandem(a-Si/Micro-Si) Amorphous Silicon
-CIGS price/Wp closer to c-Si
Source: pvxchange.com
19. Land and BoS Costs – Disadvantage for Thin
Films
• Land requirement higher for Thin Films
• BoS requirement higher because of lower efficiencies
BOS cost comparison : c-Si v CdTe
$13,000 higher for Thin Film plant Source: GTM Research
20. Operations and Maintenance – Higher cost
• More exposed area – more cleaning, more
manpower requirement
• More BOS ….
– More Strings
– More Fuses
– More cable
…..more breakdown possibilities
21. Still….
• Overall cost lower than c-Si
– Land cost in India is negligible
– Higher BOS cost offset by lower module price
– O&M Labor cost low
• Marketing mantra for TF
– $/kWh and not $/Wp
22. 1. How is Thin Film Technology doing in India?
3. What is driving the growth?
c. Financing
4. What could happen?
23. Cost of Financing
• Project financing – very challenging to secure
• Indian banks are more comfortable with recourse-to-
balance sheet financing
• EXIM, ECB banks offer attractive interest rates
• Even after hedging and insurance, cost of capital at 8-9%
as against 13%+ for local financing
24. Agenda
1. Introduction
2. How is Thin Film Technology doing in India ?
3. What is driving the growth?
4. What is the future outlook for Thin Films?
5. Conclusion
25. Thin films domination to continue
• JNNSM - Round 2 : 350 MW allotted
– 300 MWp of projects will be in Rajasthan
– At least 250 MW expected to go for thin films
• Gujarat – TF likely to dominate
• Rajasthan and Karnataka – TF likely to grab higher market
share than c-Si
26. c-Si manufacturing will require stimulus
• Local content requirement objectives not likely to be met
• Indian c-Si manufacturers will be forced to reduce costs faster
to remain competitive with TF
• Policy support critical to develop local PV manufacturing
ecosystem
• Rooftop policies could help c-Si because of limited space
27. Will TF be manufactured in India?
a- Si CdTe CIGS
Capital $ 2.92 Million / MW $ 1.46 Million / MW $ 2.02 Million / MW
Investments*
Project timeline 2.5 – 3 yrs 1.5 – 2 years ~ 2 Years
Cost Drivers Raw materials and Raw materials and Raw materials and
consumables, consumables, consumables,
CAPEX depreciation CAPEX depreciation CAPEX depreciation
* Excluding land cost
-Long lead times and huge investments are challenges
-Global excess production capacity is a major roadblock
28. Agenda
1. Introduction
2. How is Thin Film Technology doing in India ?
3. What is driving the growth?
4. What could happen?
5. Conclusion
29. Takeaways..
• Thin film technology adopted by majority of Indian
developers
• Yield, lower capital cost and better financing options
driving TF growth in India
• Local content mandates have had limited impact
• Global TF manufacturers benefitting from India’s
solar boom…
• … but the Indian TF manufacturing ecosystem is yet
to evolve
30. Conclusion
• Global market dynamics will have huge impact
on the technology selection
• If c-Si prices achieve parity with TF, c-Si will
become more competitive
• As long as land is cheap, thin films will rule in
India
32. Thank you
Madhavan Nampoothiri
Energy Alternatives India
Mob: 98848-29214
madhavan@eai.in
www.eai.in
Editor's Notes
i
Oerlikon – 240 million euro’s / 120 mw of a- si plantFirst Solar – 430 million $ for a 300 mw CdTe plantCentrotherm– 1.4 billion euro’s for a 1000 mw CIGS plant