For a version of this presentation with audio see: http://goo.gl/WAaGu
In business, social media, and other aspects of contemporary society, we can trace the shift in models of production, delivery, and consumption from Push (broadcast) to Pull (download) to Share (co-create). Similarly, we are beginning to see new models of provision emerging in higher education. As Curtis Bonk points out in "The World is Open: How Technology is Revolutionizing Education", in theory, “[a]nyone can now learn anything from anyone at anytime” (2009). Martin Wellers is one of an increasing numbers of academics that are promoting the benefits of open, digital scholarship (2011). However, rather than transforming how courses are designed and delivered, most institutions of higher learning are using information technology in a limited way, to enhance traditional classroom teaching (Bates, A. W. T., Sangra, A. 2011). Although institutional structures and practices may be resistant to change, innovative individuals and institutions have developed “open” strategies that provide models for others to follow.
For several years, coordinators of OOCs (Open Online Courses) and MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) have made use of network technologies to leverage the wisdom of the crowd and to amplify the reach of tertiary courses for both credit and non-credit students (de Waard et al., 2011; Kop, Fornier, & Sui Fai Mak, 2011). More recently, Stanford Engineering Everywhere (SEE) and MIT’s MITx, have demonstrated how traditional, formal learning for a limited number of fee-paying students can support informal learning for a much larger number of off-campus participants for free. In this paper, I discuss recent research relating to open education and report on my experience as a non-credit participant in several open courses. I discuss recent initiatives by Stanford and MIT and reflect on the potential of Open strategies for traditional tertiary institutions.
4. “[T]he Open Scholar is
someone who makes their intellectual
projects and processes digitally visible
and who invites and encourages ongoing
criticism of their work and secondary
uses of any or all parts of it — at any
stage of its development”.
Gideon Burton, Academic Evolution Blog
(by way of Terry Anderson) http://www.academicevolution.com/2009/08/the-open-scholar.html
14. UDACITY.com
“Behind every Udacity class will be a
production team, not unlike a film crew. The
professor will become an actor-producer.
Which makes Thrun the studio head”.
“In 50 years, he says, there will be only 10
institutions in the world delivering higher
education and Udacity has a shot at being one
of them”.
Steven Leckart: “The Stanford Education Experiment Could Change Higher
Learning Forever” (WIRED 20 March, 2012)
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/ff_aiclass/all/1 Accessed 11 April 2012
24. Change11 Course Facilitators
(http://goo.gl/WXipB Accessed 12 April 2012)
Stephen Downes
http://www.downes.ca
Stephen Downes is a senior researcher for Canada's National Research Council and a leading
proponent of the use of online media and services in education. As the author of the widely-read
OLDaily online newsletter, Downes has earned international recognition for his leading-edge
work in the field of online learning.
George Siemens
http://www.elearnspace.org www.elearnspace.org/about.htm
George Siemens is an internationally known writer, speaker, and researcher on learning,
networks, technology and organizational effectiveness in digital environments. He is the author
of Knowing Knowledge, an exploration of how the context and characteristics of knowledge have
changed and what it means to organizations today, and the recently released Handbook of
Emerging Technologies for Learning. Siemens is currently a researcher and strategist with the
Technology Enhanced Knowledge Research Institute at Athabasca University.
Dave Cormier
http://www.davecormier.com
Dave Cormier is an independent educational researcher and thinker, an online community
manager and the Manager of web communications and innovations at the University of Prince
Edward Island. He has published on open education, the rhizomatic model of education, and
practical classroom uses of virtual worlds.
34. The notion of connectedness:
“It's about expertise that's widely
distributed in our society and culture, and
the fact that anybody can help somebody
else get better at something.”
Mimi Ito, Cultural Anthropologist, Digital Media Learning
Research Hub (University of California, Irvine)
http://www.itofisher.com/mito/
35. “The product of learning
is not knowledge, the
product of learning is a
transformed learner.”
– Stephen Downes
http://www.downes.ca/
36. Institutional? Personal? Formal? Informal?
“It’s life, Jim but
not as we know it”
+ Just-in-time learning
+ Resources help when-and-where-needed
+ Thinking, fast and slow
+ Drive-by-assignments
+ Collapsing sites, practices, identities
37. Bora: “We’re what we are”
“ we don’t need no leaders to follow blind
we don’t need no heroes to copy / paste
i object!
we’re on a wrong way
i reject!
plastic sincerity
we can break new own grounds, mature own fruits
we can break new own grounds, that fit our needs
http://www.lyricsmania.com/were_what_we_are_lyrics_bora.html Accessed 12 April 2012 ”
41. Industries, organizations, and other non-physical, non-
tangible “purposed systems” can be considered as
technologies .
Whereas one technology might be “adopted” by another
technology this process does not work for institutional
systems, which are comprised of a collection or “body” of
technologies.
The process that takes place when one body of technology
comes into contact with a different body of technology is
more like an encounter than an adaptation. The result can
be a parting of the ways, or a transformation that leads to a
new combination of technologies.
W. Brian Arthur
“The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves”, 2009. http://goo.gl/b9MG9
42. The dominant perspectives on technology give priority to
either the social or the technology side of the equation, and
they share what Orlokowski calls an “ontology of
separateness”. She argues for a “relational ontology” that
focuses on the assemblages, associations, and networks of
humans and technologies that occur through
“entanglements in practice”.
W. J. Orlokowski
“The sociomateriality of organisational life:
considering technology in management research” (2009) http://goo.gl/Acm4k
43. As Arthur C. Clarke says, “[a]ny sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.”*
The real magic is not the technology, but itsinvisibility.
All technologies become invisible
through repeated use- until they fail.
Then, we are reminded of the magic,
the seeming impossibility of how it
works, and the fact that it can stop
working. The distortion of a cellphone
call, a frozen video frame, and the
crackle of aradiotransmission are all
wake-up calls.
*Arthur C. Clarke
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke's_three_laws Accessed 12 April 2012
Also see: Kindle screen failure reveals repressed memory of earlier technology
http://goo.gl/bWXzK
44. The biggest elephants
in the room are the ones we
are riding – the technologies
(systems, structures,
practices) that we have
internalized and rendered
invisible.
56. New Zealand Education Act 1989
Accessed 11 April 2012
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1989/0080/latest/DLM183668.html
57. New Zealand Education Act 1989 Accessed 11 April 2012 http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1989/0080/latest/DLM183668.html
58. It’s not the tool, it’s the
technique. It’s not the fish,
it’s the pond. It’s not the
dancers, it’s the dance.
59. Photo by by thumeco (CC-BY-NC-SA)
http://goo.gl/Ngc41
60. Federation Square, Melbourne (2001,
Lab Architecture Studio + Bates Smart)
Photo by Mark McGuire (CC-BY)
Royal Ontario Museum (2007, Studio Daniel
Libeskind) Photo by Eric Mutrie (CC-BY)
http://goo.gl/Lqbkm
Jewish Museum, Berlin (2001, Studio Daniel
Libeskind) Photo by Guenter Schneider
(CC-BY) http://goo.gl/lZr4P
61. Tony Bates: “Transforming teaching and learning through technology management”
Change11 MOOC Live Session 16 October, 2011
Bates, A. W. T., Sangra, A. (2011). Managing Technology in Higher Education: Strategies for Transforming Teaching and Learning: Jossey-Bass.
63. Question: Why do most
university logos have a
shield? Who are they
protecting themselves from?
http://goo.gl/tAmCg Accessed 11 April, 2012
64. It’s not about the future of the book,
it’s about the future of reading.
It’s not about the future of
universities, it’s about the future of
higher education.
It’s not about the future of
technologies, it’s about what we
want to do in the future.
66. University academics occupy a
privileged position in society.
In terms of education, we are
part of the 1%.
We have the right, and
the responsibility, to
act in the best interest
of the 99%.
67. Imagine that the classroom is surrounded by
permeable screens rather than opaque walls with
restricted points of entry. These screens are constructed from course
descriptions, aims and objectives, schedules, and assessment criteria that
serve as the perimeter that defines and contains a course of study. The screens
are flexible and moveable. Imagine that this structure sits in the middle of a
public space dotted with other permeable structures. Inside each of them,
problems are posed and questions are raised. People work together under the
guidance of an expert investigator to find solutions to problems and answers to
questions. They call upon others beyond the screen as required, and they
access information that passes freely into and out of the structure and between
structures and other spaces. They venture out to consult with other experts and
to gather new information, which they bring back to the group. People outside
the structure can overhear some of their discussions and can peer through
small openings to watch some of the activities. An archive of their work, which
is created as part of the process of investigation, serves as a shared history
that anyone can use and build upon.
From SHIFTING GEAR: Transforming Our Communities of Learning, Report #1 from the CALT
Thinktank on ICT, University of Otago, May 2009
70. SPACE is created
through the act of
communication.
Co n v e r s a t i o n
creates shared
space. OPEN
conversation
creates PUBLIC SPACE.
71. Innovation is not about
changing how we do what we
do; innovation is about
changing our mind about
what we need to do, and then
creating technologies that will
enable us to do it.
72. Can institutions of higher
education transform themselves
from within?
Can elephants learn to dance?
It depends on how well we are
able to ride them.
First, we have to ask ourselves:
“who are they (we) dancing for?”