3. Spring Lake MS
Reading
100
90
80
70 62.3
60 55.5
49.8 48.9
50
40 35.2
30
20
10
0
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Reading Composite ED
Non-ED SWD
Linear (Reading Composite)
4. Spring Lake MS
Math
100
90
80 69.4 71.1
70 59.9 63.8
60
50 45.2
40 36.1
30
20
10
0
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Math Composite ED
Non-ED SWD
Linear (Math Composite)
5. Spring Lake Middle School
8th Science and Algebra
100 100 100 100 100
90 81.8
80 72 74
69.7
70
60
50 45.3
40
30
20.5
20
10
0
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Science Algebra1
6. Disciplinary Assignments
Disciplinary Assignments
35
31
30
25 22
20
15
15 12
10
10 Disciplinary Assignments
5
5
0
Year end data – Aug to June
7. SLMS Targets
Met Expected Met High
Status
Growth Growth
2011-2012 Yes Yes School of Progress
2010-2011 Yes Yes School of Progress
2009-2010 Yes Yes Priority School
2008-2009 Yes No Priority School
2007-2008 Yes Yes Priority School
2006-2007 No No Priority School
8. SLMS
What Made the Difference?
• Focus on Literacy
• Instructional Support – Facilitators
• Enrichment / Remediation
– Data Driven
9. SLMS
Sustaining Success
• Instructional Coaches
• Professional Learning Communities
• Collaborative Planning
– Common Assessments
• Instructional Supervision and Support
• Increased focused on 21st teaching and learning
10. SLMS
On the Horizon
• Block Scheduling
• Teaming
• PBIS
• Professional Learning Communities
