AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
CCC FDW FA2011
1. Cell models: a virtual scavenger hunt Presented by May Coulson Adjunct faculty, City colleges of Chicago Aug 9, 2011
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. Rubrics: individual participation Evaluation criteria Proficient Adequate Not there at all Evidence of critical thinking Provides superior documentation of the relevance of image to a component of the cell type. Clear evidence is demonstrated of the relationship of each cell component to the cell type (4pts) Description of image relates somewhat to cell components and/or cell type (3pts) Does not provide documentation of relevance of image to cell type or cell component(0pts) Ideas Demonstrates use of creativity and imagination (4pts) Some evidence of creativity and imagination is present (3pts) Creativity and imagination not present (0 pts) Appropriate web links and timeliness Finds relevant and correct web sites (URL) and completed by deadline (2pts) Web sites and links are somewhat relevant (1pt) Does not provide web link (URL) and not completed by deadline (0pts)
11. Rubrics: group participation Evaluation criteria Proficient Adequate Not there at all Evidence of collaboration in group Actively participates in group and collaborates with fellow group members (3pts) Minimal participation, collaborates with fellow group members occasionally (2pts) No interaction with fellow group members (0pts) Frequency of group interactions Frequent logins and group postings (2pts) Minimal logins and group postings (1pt) No logins and no group postings (0pts)
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17. Thank you Questions? Power point slides available via Slideshare Email: mtso@ccc.edu