Presented by Jui Shah, MEASURE Evaluation/ICF International, as part of a symposium organized by MEASURE Evaluation and MEASURE DHS at the 6th MIM Pan-African Malaria Conference.
Developing a Framework for In-country Impact Evaluations of Malaria Control Efforts
1. Developing a framework for
in-country impact evaluations of
malaria control efforts
Jui Shah, MPH
Team: Achuyt Bhattarai, Christie Hershey, Eline Korenromp, Elizabeth Ivanovich, Erin
Eckert, Holly Newby, Liliana Carvajal, Richard Cibulskis , Mike Lynch, Ryuichi Komatsu,
Thom Eisele, Yazoume Ye
3. Background: Defining the need
Last decade of malaria control
Renewed attention and resources
Scale up of key interventions
Current need to assess the effect of this scale up
4. Background: Building on past
work
Monitoring & Evaluation Reference Group
(MERG)
Plausibility design proposed by Alex Rowe and
MERG colleagues in 2007
Need to address 2015 MDG measurement needs
Incorporate new evidence, experience, and
thinking
5. Purpose of the document
Review and update the 2007 evaluation
framework
Make recommendations for evaluating the impact
of scaling up malaria control interventions
Summarize recent experiences, including impact
evaluations of PMI priority countries
8. Development process
Identify core writing team
Develop outline of the guidance document
Assign sections to authors
Craft preliminary drafts
Complete internal and external reviews
Finalize text and formatting
Print and disseminate document
9. Content
Definition of key concepts
Executive summary
Introduction and objectives
Process for implementing
impact evaluation
Evaluation design
Program description
Measuring the coverage of
malaria control interventions
Measuring transmission
intensity
Measuring malaria morbidity
Measuring mortality
Measuring and accounting
for non-malaria programs
factors
Data synthesis, triangulation
and interpretation
Challenges
Way forward
Appendices (case studies)
10. Process of implementing
evaluation
Step 2.
Malaria
Control
Program
Description
Step 5.
Ensure Use
and
Disseminate
Findings
Step 1.
Stakeholder
Engagement
Step 4.
Generate
Credible
Evidence
Step 3.
Develop
Evaluation
Design
11. Conceptual framework
Confounders
Coverage of primary malaria control
interventions
Coverage of other child survival
interventions
Case management
Vector control (ITNs and IRS)
Malaria prevention in pregnancy
(ITNs and IPTp)
ORT , EPI
Access / demand for healthcare
Nutrition
IMCI, PMTCT
Rainfall /
temperature
Malaria
transmission
Confounders
(Confounder)
Impact on malaria
Malaria-related morbidity
(mostly among children and
pregnant women in stable
transmission areas)
Malaria-related mortality
in children
Child morbidity and mortality due
to other cause than malaria
Diarrheal disease
ARI (Pneumonia)
Nutrition
HIV
Impact on all-cause child mortality
12. Measuring coverage
9 indicators for
vector control
1 indicator for
malaria prevention
during pregnancy
3 indicators for
diagnosis and
treatment practices
14. Measuring mortality
Malaria-specific mortality
Health management and information system
Civil registration and vital statistics
Verbal autopsy
All-cause under-five mortality
15. Measuring contextual factors
Category
Child survival
interventions
Examples
Data sources
EPI coverage, micro-nutrient
supplementation coverage
WHO, UNICEF,
DHS, MICS
Environmental
factors
Rainfall, temperature, land
cover, flood, drought
National
meteorological
agency, online
datasets
Health systems
factors
Per capita expenditure on health WHO, World Bank
Socioeconomic
factors
Household asset and income,
parental education, economic
crises, GDP per capita,
population living below poverty
line
DHS, MICS
World Bank
16. Triangulation and interpretation
Primary analysis
Trends over time
Stratification
Secondary analysis
Meta analysis (multi-country)
17. Next steps
Finalize text
Complete internal and external reviews
Print and disseminate document