This document summarizes concerns expressed by the Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens group regarding a proposed wind turbine project in their community. It outlines objections to the project location, concerns about potential health impacts and low-frequency noise from turbines, and requests such as for a drainage management plan and property value protections. The group feels the project developer has not adequately addressed issues raised during consultation meetings.
North Perth and Perth East: Not a Willing Host for Industrial Wind Turbines
1. Overview of Wind Turbine
Project
Community Information Meeting
April 3, 2013
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
2. Not a Willing Host
• Objection is not to the look of the turbines
• North Perth/Perth East is different than other
areas proposed for turbines
– Class 1 agricultural land should be protected
– Very intensive livestock production
– Dense population exposed to health issues
• Turbines represent a real threat to our economy
• Invenergy has shown no willingness in public
meetings to address concerns raised by this
community
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
3. Information on Proposed Project
• Conestogo Wind Farm proposed by Invenergy Canada
which is subsidiary of US firm
• Granted ‘Feed-in-Tariff’ contract for 69 MW in 2009
• Leased land from 8 families; 4 of them now want out of
their contracts
• Proposing 26 turbines @ 2.78MW/turbine
– 22 in North Perth; 4 in Perth East
• Linked to the Hydro One grid at a sub-station near
Hawkesville in Wellesley Township
• Turbines connected to sub-station by underground
collector lines
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
4. Approval Process
• Minimum Consultation Requirements
– Initial Public Meeting – June 2012
– Provide draft documentation for 60 days – December 2012
– Second Public Meeting – February 2013
• Prepare and Submit Final Documentation to MOE
• MOE reviews for completeness
• Posted to comment period – 30 – 45 days
• Final assessment & decision by MOE – max 6 months
• If approved – appeal to Environmental Review Tribunal
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
5. Invenergy Project Status
• Invenergy has technically gone through all of
the required consultation steps
• North Perth advised MOE that requirements
for final consultation were not met:
– Documentation incomplete
– No response to issues from initial public meeting
– Building permits omitted
• MOE – Mar 19 – understand that Invenergy is
‘continuing with their consultation efforts’
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
6. Changes to Approval Process
• February 19 Throne Speech
– Looking for willing host communities
– Proponents need to address residents’ concerns
• Minister of Energy - Bob Chiarelli – March 27
– ‘Much more control in hands of local communities’
• Premier Kathleen Wynne – March 28
– New rules coming – ‘municipal control and autonomy
over placement of turbines’
• Final Rules Unknown
– Actual changes to municipal powers?
– Changes apply to which projects?
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
7. Turbine Siting Rules
• Existing Buildings Considered In Plan
– Dwellings, schools, day nurseries, a health care facility,
a community centre and churches.
– Agricultural and industrial buildings not included
• Building Permits
– Permit issued under the Building Code Act for a
building where construction has not commenced.
• Effective Date
– Day before published notice of the draft site plan
• Draft Site Plan dated August 7, 2012
• MOE response to resident – building permits
must be respected
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
8. Vacant Lot Receptors
• Project plans must also consider accessible vacant lots that have
been zoned to permit a residence by identifying a ‘vacant lot
receptor’ for each vacant lot.
• Vacant lot receptor is where:
– ‘building would reasonably be expected to be located, having regard to
the existing zoning by-law and the typical building pattern in the area’.
• Considerations for typical building pattern:
– Minimum distance separation from livestock barns
– Flood plains or other seasonally wet areas
– Dust from gravel road, access to paved road
– Too close to collector lines
• Landowners can request changes in location of vacant lot receptor
chosen by Invenergy. No approval or building permit required.
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
9. Health Impact
• Reports from residents living among the 115 turbines in Kincardine
Enbridge Project
• Continual vibrating/pulsing sensation felt throughout the body
when turbines operate
• Symptoms reported
– High pitched ringing in ears, tinnitus
– Uncomfortable to painful pressure building up in the ears
– Headaches, dizziness, light headedness, vertigo
– Heart palpitations, chest tension, elevated blood pressure
– Inability to sleep, loss of concentration,
– cognitive impairment, mood disorders
• Symptoms lessen when away from homes for 1-2 hrs.
• Reports labeled ‘absolutely legitimate’ by Grey-Bruce Medical
Officer of Health, Dr. Hazel Lynn
10. MOE Regulation of Turbine Noise
• Testing restricted to audible noise
– Only ‘a-weighted’ sounds that human ear can hear
– No consideration for low frequency noise/infrasound
• Applied through computer noise models
– Assume ground is always soft with vegetative cover
– Questionable modeling of multiple turbines
– No validation of models with real experience
• All testing takes place outside homes when reported
problems are worse inside homes
• No testing recommended in winter when problems are
worse as MOE-specified microphones can freeze
11. Invenergy Noise Levels
• Limit for audible noise is 40 dBA
• Predicted noise levels by Invenergy
– 7 homes receive 40 dBA
– 36 homes receive 39 dBA
– 34 homes receive 38 dBA
• Even small errors in noise estimates will mean
that these homes could be over legal limit
• Worst area is along Line 72 (10th) where 19
receptors are predicted to receive 39 or 40 dBA
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
12. Low Frequency Noise/Infrasound
• Symptoms reported consistent with low frequency noise/ infrasound;
not audible noise
• Linked to wind turbine health issues by recent studies
– Alec Salt – August 2012
• infrasound from wind turbines can cause harm to human health
• harm may be irreversible for people with long exposure
– Nissenbaum, Aramini and Hanning - Sept/Oct 2012
• People within 1.4 km of turbines had worse sleep and impaired mental health
– Rand, Ambrose and Krogh - 2012
• Elevated levels of low frequency noise present in homes close to Falmouth,
Massachusetts turbines. Researchers reported symptoms.
– Watts and Watts – September 2012
• Medical doctor reviews literature on ‘Noise and Health’ as response to specific
wind turbine project near Canberra Australia.
– Wisconsin Study of Shirley Wind Project – January 2013
• 4 acousticians run concurrent studies of noise in abandoned homes
• Low frequency noise/infrasound linked to turbines present
13. Impact on Drainage
• Project has potential to affect drainage patterns in area
– Change or block natural water courses
– Block municipal drains
– Damage private drains
– Contaminate run-off
• Need to anticipate and prevent problems; not fix later
• North Perth requested a Comprehensive Drainage
Management Plan for all areas affected by turbine,
road access and collector line construction before any
construction is started.
• Property owners with specific concerns should identify
these to MOE immediately with copy to municipality
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
14. Property Values
• Experience in other communities suggest that wind
turbines can decrease property values by 20% to 35%
– Freestanding houses and small parcels of land are affected
– Impact unclear on parcels of farmland
• Ontario Real Estate Board requires declaration of
existing or proposed turbines within 2 kilometres when
selling property
• North Perth asked for Property Value Protection
Program be included in approval
• Invenergy rejected proposal as too complex
• Residents who are concerned should raise issue with
MOE and support Property Value Protection Plan.
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens
15. Air Ambulances
• Air ambulance is a key part of health infrastructure:
– Ability to fly in less than ideal weather conditions
– Direct routes from Listowel to London & Hamilton
hospitals
– Flexibility to land at accident locations
• Need 1 kilometer horizontal and 500 meter vertical
separation from turbine wakes
• Invenergy requested to provide a 2 kilometer wide
corridor for air ambulances south from Listowel
• MOE advised one resident to work with municipality
April 3, 2013 Elma-Mornington Concerned Citizens