3. Deveg¬eÀceefCekeÀe Ta b l e o f C o nT e n TS
DeO³ee³e He=<þ ¬eÀceebkeÀ Chapter Pg. No.
The Team 8
Òepee®eer ìerce 6
ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeeR®es ÒeieleerHegmlekeÀ keÀe Heeefnpes DeeefCe keÀmes Heeefnpes? 10 Why was a report card needed and what does it contain? 11
ÒemleeJevee 12 Foreword 14
$eÝCeefveosMe 16 Acknowledgements 17
veiejmesJekeÀeb®³ee keÀeceefiejer®es Jemlegefve<þ cetu³eceeHeve 18
Assessing the performance of Municipal Councillors objectively 19
¬eÀceJeejer iegCe leeefuekeÀe 20
Ranking Score Sheet 20
keÀe³e&He×leer
The Methodology
(1) cetu³eceeHeve ceespeHeÆer 134
(1) The Matrix – Scale of Ranking 148
(2) De@HeÀer[sJnerì Üejs peenerj kesÀuesueer ceeieerue (YetlekeÀeueerve) ceeefnleer 137 (2) Parameters for Past Records as per Affidavit 151
(3) ceneveiejHeeefuekeÀe DeeefCe meefceleer yewþkeÀeleerue keÀeceieerjer mebyebOeer cetu³eceeHeve IeìkeÀ 138 (3) Parameters for Present Performance in the Corporation and
Committee Meetings 153
(4) pevecele ®ee®eCeervegmeej ueeskeÀeb®eer celes/¢<ìerkeÀesve 142 (4) Parameters for People’s Perception as per Opinion Poll 156
(5) vekeÀejelcekeÀ iegCeebkeÀvee®es IeìkeÀ 146 (5) Parameters for Negative Marking 160
4 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 5
4. Òçpçç®ççÇ ìçÇcç
mçuuççiççj çÆJçHçáuç DçbyççvççÇ
Dçvçápç YçiçJçlççÇ yçBkçÀ J³ççJçmçççƳçkçÀ
GÐççípçkçÀ çÆJçJçíkçÀ DçmçjçvççÇ
[ç@. mççÇ. Dççj. ÞççÇOçj GÐççípçkçÀ
çÆJçHçCçvç mçbMççíOçvç çÆJç<ç³çkçÀ J³ççJçmçççƳçkçÀ cççkçxÀì jçÇmç®ç& SpçvmççÇ
Dçç³çjçÇmç cç[íjç nbmçç jçÇmç®ç&
çÆMç#çCççÆJç<ç³çkçÀ mçuuççiççj, mçWìj HçÀç@j çÆmçJnçÇuç mççímçç³çìçÇ®³çç mçuuççiççj mçom³ç DçMççíkçÀ oçmç
pçcççuç cçíkçÀuççF& J³çJçmLççHçkçÀçdzç mçb®ççuçkçÀ, nbmçç jçÇmç®ç&
HçjkçÀçÇ³ç ®çuçvççÆJç<ç³çkçÀ mçuuççiççj YççJçíMç cçvççÆmçbIççvççÇ
pçápçá yççmçÓ mçbMççíOçvç mçb®ççuçkçÀ, nbmçç jçÇmç®ç&
pçççÆnjçlç J³ççJçmçççƳçkçÀ DçççÆCç nbmçç ìçÇcç®çí Flçj mçom³ç – içCçíMç vççF&kçÀ, pçç@³ç ®ç¬çÀJçlçça, mçáçÆMçuç iççÌ[, kç=À<CçkçÀçblç çÆlçJççjçÇ, jçpçíMç Mçákçwuçç, cçvççÇ<ç
çÆlçJççjçÇ, mçáçÆyçlçç Mçcçç&
kçíÀ. Scç. Smç. (ìçÇìá) DçnuçáJçççÆuç³çç
vççÇuçmçvç DççíDççjpççÇ-cççiç&®çí cççpççÇ DçO³ç#ç DçççÆCç mççÇF&Dççí mççnç³³çkçÀ
[çÇ. Scç. mçáKçìCçkçÀj
çÆvçlççF& cçínlçç
Dçç³çSSmç (çÆvçJç=Êç), cççpççÇ cçáK³ç mççÆ®çJç cçnçjçä^ Mççmçvç; GHççO³ç#ç, DçivççÇ
kçÀç³ç&kçÀçjçÇ çÆJçéçmlç, Òçpçç HçÀçTb[íMçvç, GÐççípçkçÀ
p³çáçÆuçDççí çÆjyçíjçí
jçpçvç cçínjç
Dçç³çHççÇSmç (çÆvçJç=Êç), cçábyçF&®çí cççpççÇ HççíçÆuçmç Dçç³çákçwlç
GÐççípçkçÀ
vçmççÇj cçáKlççj cçábpççÇ
MçíKçj Iççí<ç
cççpççÇ J³çJçmLççHçkçÀçdzç mçb®ççuçkçÀ, Dçç³ç[çÇSHçÀmççÇ
mççÇF&Dççí - lçlJç HççqyuçkçÀ çÆjuçíMçvmç; pçvçmçbHçkç&ÀçÆJç<ç³çkçÀ mçuuççiççj, Òçpçç HçÀçTb[íMçvç
mçácçbiçuççÇ içç[ç Òçpçç kçÀcç&®ççjçÇ Jçiç&
mçbmLççHçkçÀ çÆJçéçmlç, Òçpçç HçÀçTb[íMçvç; GÐççípçkçÀ çÆcççÆuçbo cnmkçíÀ
[ç@. mçácçç çÆ®çìCççÇmç ÒçkçÀuHç mçb®ççuçkçÀ, Òçpçç HçÀçTb[íMçvç
mçcççpçMççðç%ç DçççÆCç SmçSvç[çÇìçÇ çÆJçÐççHççÇþ箳çç cççpççÇ kçáÀuçiç᪠çÆÒç³ççbkçÀç Mçcçç&
mççívççuççÇ MççnHçÓjJççuçç ÒçkçÀuHç J³çJçmLççHçkçÀ, Òçpçç HçÀçTb[íMçvç
yçBkçÀ J³ççJçmçççƳçkçÀ DçççÆCç Òçpçç®çí Flçj kçÀcç&®ççjçÇ Hçá{çÇuçÒçcççCçí – kçÀçÌmlçáYç Içjlç, yçuçJçblç çÆkçÀjçj, çÆouççÇHç lççbyçí, vççÇuçcç çÆcçjçMççÇ,
çÆvçlççÇvç çÆcçjçMççÇ, çÆJçHçáuç Içjlç, ªHççuççÇ Içç[çÇiççJçkçÀj, Þç×ç Hçjyç, çÆcççÆuçbo jí[kçÀj, Dçlçáuç içájJç, Dçcçí³ç HçÀ[kçíÀ,
çÆJçvç³ç mçbIçJççÇ
DççÆKçuçíMç MçjCç
GÐççípçkçÀ
6 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 7
5. TH e T ea M
Advisors Market Research Agency
Hansa Research
Anuj Bhagwati
Entrepreneur Ashok Das
Managing Director, Hansa Research
Dr. C. R. Sridhar
Market Research Professional Bhavesh Mansinghani
Iris Madeira Research Director, Hansa Research
Education Consultant, Board of Advisor’s Centre for Civil Society And the rest of the Hansa team including – Ganesh Naik, Joy Chakraborty, Sushil Gaud,
Krishnakant Tiwari, Rajesh Shukla, Manish Tiwari, Subita Sharma
Jamal Mecklai
Foreign Exchange Consultant
Supporters
Juju Basu
Advertising Professional D M Sukhtankar
former Municipal Commissioner, Mumbai and former Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra
K.M.S. (Titoo) Ahluwalia
Former Chairman & CEO A.C. Nielsen ORG-MARG Julio Ribeiro
IPS (Retd.), former Commissioner of Mumbai Police
Nitai Mehta
Managing Trustee, Praja Foundation; Business Entrepreneur Nasser Mukhtar Munjee
Former MD, IDFC
Rajan Mehra
Entrepreneur
Praja Staff
Shekhar Ghosh
Milind Mhaske
CEO, Tatva Public Relations; PR Advisor, Praja Foundation
Project Director, Praja Foundation
Sumangali Gada
Priyanka Sharma
Founder Trustee, Praja Foundation; Entrepreneur
Project Manager, Praja Foundation
Dr. Suma Chitnis
Social Scientist & former Vice Chancellor, SNDT University And the rest of the Praja Staff including – Kaustubh Gharat, Balwant Kirar, Dilip Tambe,
Neelam Mirashi, Nitin Mirashi, Vipul Gharat, Rupali Ghadigaonkar, Shradha Parab,
Sonali Shahpurwala Milind Redkar, Atul Gurav, Amey Phadke, Akhilesh Sharan
Banker
Vinay Sanghi
Entrepreneur
Vipul Ambani
Banking
Vivek Asrani
Entrepreneur
8 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 9
6. W Hy WaS a r e p o rT C a r d n e e d e d a n d
uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççR®çí ÒçiçlççÇHçámlçkçÀ kçÀç HçççÆnpçí DçççÆCç kçÀmçí HçççÆnpçí? W HaT d o eS iT C o nTa i n ?
DççHçu³çç oíMççvçí mJççlçb$³ççHç½ççlç ÒçççÆlççÆvççÆOçkçÀ uççíkçÀMççnçÇ®ççÇ kçÀç³ç&Hç×lççÇ mJççÇkçÀçjuççÇ. cnCçÓvç Hçb®çç³çlççÇHççmçÓvç The People of India have had Elected Representatives representing them in
various bodies from the parliament to the panchayat for the last 60 years.
mçbmçoíHç³ç¥lç mçJç& mlçjçbJçj uççíkçÀçbvççÇ çÆvçJç[Óvç çÆouçíuçí uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççÇ l³ççb®çí ÒççÆlççÆvççÆOçlJç kçÀjlççlç.
These representatives have deliberated, debated, questioned, proposed
Yççjlççdzç mçbçÆJçOççvççvçí DççKçÓvç çÆouçíu³çç ®ççÌkçÀìçÇlç kçÀçcç kçÀjCçí, ®ç®çç& Jç çÆJç®ççjçÆJççÆvçcç³ç kçÀjCçí, vçJçí kçÀç³çoí new laws, passed new laws and governed the nation at all levels using the
cçbpçÓj kçÀjCçí DçççÆCç oíMçç®çç kçÀçjYççj ®ççuçJçCçí nçÇ uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççR®ççÇ pçyççyçoçjçÇ Dççní. Hçjblçá içíu³çç lççÇvç mechanisms given to them by the Constitution of India. The 1950 constitution
which we gave to ourselves laid out the way in which we would govern
oMçkçÀçbHççmçÓvç DççHçu³çç jçp³çkçÀçjYççjç®çç opçç& KççuççJçlç ®ççuçuçç Dççní. ³çç®ççÇ DçvçíkçÀçÆJçOç kçÀçjCçí Dççnílç. ourselves. In the last three decades we have seen a steady decline in the
l³ççHçÌkçÀçÇ cçnÊJçç®ççÇ oçívç kçÀçjCçí cnCçpçí jçpçkçÀçjCçç®çí Jçç{lçí J³ççHççjçÇkçÀjCç DçççÆCç içávníiççjçÇkçÀjCç. quality of governance due to various reasons, prime amongst them being
commercialisation of politics and criminalisation of politics, this has created a
jçpçkçÀçjCçç®çí yçouçlç pççCççjí mJçªHç Dççcç pçvçlçç cçákçÀçìHçCçí Hççnçlç Dççní. DççHçuçí mçjkçÀçj DçççÆCç huge governance deficit in our country.
uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççÇ ³ççb®³ççJçj®çç l³ççb®çç çÆJçéççmç G[lç ®ççuçuçç Dççní. The Electorate has remained a silent witness for most part of this and are feeling
let down and frustrated by the Government and the elected representatives.
oj Hçç®ç Jç<çç¥vççÇ SkçÀoç çÆvçJç[CçákçÀç ³çílççlç. ³ççJçíUçÇ cçlçoçjçbvçç KçN³çç DçLçç&vçí cçlçÒçoMç&vçç®ççÇ mçbOççÇ çÆcçUCçí.
The time when the citizen has a ‘real’ say, is during elections which happens
içíu³çç kçÀç³ç&kçÀçUçlç DççHçu³çç uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççÇvçí kçÀMçç ÒçkçÀçj®çí kçÀçcç kçíÀuçí ní lçHççmçC³çç®ççÇ çÆvçJç[CçÓkçÀ nçÇ once in five years. The elections are the only time when the elected
SkçÀcçíJç mçbOççÇ Dçmçlçí. representatives are appraised for their performance in the corresponding term
by the electorate.
jçp³çkçÀçjYççjçlççÇuç Jçç{l³çç mçcçm³çç DçççÆCç vççiççÆjkçÀçb®³çç Jçç{l³çç içjpçç ³çç oçívnçÇ®çç çÆJç®ççj kçÀjlçç
Looking at the growing problems of Governance and the ever increasing needs
vççiççÆjkçÀçbMççÇ uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççR®çç mçlçlç®çç mçbJçço DçmçCçí içjpçí®çí Dççní. lçmçí®ç l³ççb®³çç kçÀçcçç®çí kçíÀJçU Hçç®ç of the citizens there is a need of a continuous dialogue and appraisal of the
Jç<çç&lçÓvç SkçÀoç®ç vçJní lçj mççlçl³ççvçí cçÓu³çcççHçvç nçíCçí içjpçí®çí Dççní. working of the elected representatives.
mççlçl³çHçÓCç& mçbJçço DçççÆCç cçÓu³çcççHçvç Mçkçw³ç JnçJçç ³çç nílçÓvçí Òçpççvçí uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççR®çí ÒçiçlççÇ HçámlçkçÀ çÆJçkçÀçÆmçlç It is this need of continuous dialogue and appraisal that made Praja develop
this Report Card.
kçíÀuçí Dççní.
Performance Appraisal of Elected Representatives has become the need of
uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççR®³çç kçÀçcççÆiçjçÇ®çí cçÓu³ççbkçÀvç nçÇ kçÀçUç®ççÇ içjpç Dççní. the hour.
This appraisal has been done keeping in mind the constitutional role
uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççR®ççÇ IçìvççlcçkçÀ YçÓçÆcçkçÀç DçççÆCç pçyççyçoçjçÇ DçççÆCç pçvçlçí®ççÇ l³çççÆJç<ç³ççÇ®ççÇ cçlçí ³çç oçívnçÇ®çç çÆJç®ççj and responsibility of the elected representatives and the opinion of their
kçÀªvç nçÇ cçÓu³çcççHçvç Hç×lççÇ çÆJçkçÀçÆmçlç kçíÀuççÇ Dççní. electorate.
³çç ÒçiçlççÇ HçámlçkçÀçlç cçábyçF&lççÇuç 227 vçiçjmçíJçkçÀçb®çç SçÆÒçuç 2010 lçí cçç®ç& 2011 ³çç kçÀçuççJçOççÇlççÇuç This Report Card covers the working and performance of the 227 elected
Municipal Councillors of Mumbai for the period of April 2010 to March 2011;
kçÀçcççÆiçjçÇ®çç; SçÆÒçuç 2010 lçí cçç®ç& 2011 ³çç kçÀçuççJçOççÇlç çÆkçÀlççÇ vçiçjmçíJçkçÀ çÆvçOççÇ Kç®ç& kçíÀuçç ³çç®çç; the Councillor Discretionary funds spent for the period of April 2010 to
vçiçjmçíJçkçÀçvçí çÆvçJç[CçÓkçÀ Dçç³ççíiççuçç Dç@çÆHçÀ[íJnçÇ[ kçÀªvç mççoj kçíÀuçíuççÇ cçççÆnlççÇ; içávníiççjçÇ Hççéç&YçÓcççÇçÆJç<ç³ççÇ March 2011; data from the affidavits filed by the Councillors with the election
DçÐç³ççJçlç cçççÆnlççÇ DçççÆCç cçábyçF& MçnjçcçO³çí kçíÀuçíuççÇ cçlç®çç®çCççÇ - ³çç DççOççjí nç uçíKççpççíKçç Içílçuçç Dççní. commission; updated data on criminal records; and results of an opinion poll
across the City of Mumbai.
DççcnçÇ Dçmçí ÒçiçlççÇHçámlçkçÀ ojJç<çça mççoj kçÀjCççj Dççnçílç. l³ççcçáUí vççiççÆjkçÀ, çÆvçJç[Óvç Dççuçíuçí ÒççÆlççÆvçOççÇ, We believe this Report Card which we will be publishing every year will give
jçpçkçÀçdzç Hç#ç DçççÆCç jçp³ç mçjkçÀçj ³ççbvçç DççHçu³çç uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççRvççÇ kçÀMçç ÒçkçÀçj®ççÇ kçÀçcççÆiçjçÇ kçíÀuççÇ ní to the citizens, elected representatives, political parties and the government
JçíUçíJçíUçÇ uç#ççlç ³çíF&uç. l³ççDççOççjí cçábyçF&lç DçççÆCç mçJç& oíMçYçj ³ççíi³ç kçÀçjYççjç®çí cççHçob[ çÆJçkçÀçÆmçlç kçíÀuçí valuable feedback on the functioning of the elected representatives. We also
hope that it will set standards and bench marks of the performance of the
pççlççÇuç, DçMççÇ Dççcnçuçç DççMçç Jççìlçí. elected representatives not only in Mumbai but across the country.
çÆvçlççF& cçínlçç, kçÀç³ç&kçÀçjçÇ çÆJçéçmlç, Òçpçç HçÀçTb[íMçvç NITAI MEHTA, Managing Trustee, Praja Foundation
10 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 11
8. parameters in the ranking scale, different weightages have been allocated
f oreW ord for: attendances in Corporation and committee meetings, for the questions
asked on issues under obligatory and discretionary duties of the Corporation,
for issues raised related to public services that are essentially municipal in
nature, and for the extent of utilisation of discretionary fund.
Local government institutions have always existed in India in one form or
another since ancient times. The present form of urban local government This initiative is the first of its kind where the elected municipal representatives’
owes its genesis to the British rule. The initiation began with Samuel Laing, performance has been appraised on the basis of objective data and the
member of the Viceroy’s Council, in his Budget Speech (1861-62) proposing perceptions of the electorate of the respective constituencies. This initiative
that local services should be based on local resources. Lord Mayo’s itself is a work in progress and future rationalising and refining of the
Resolution of 1870 introduced the concept of elected representatives in the methodology will only strengthen the initiative for evolving a strong tool for
municipalities. Lord Ripon is considered the founding father of urban local monitoring the performances of our elected municipal representatives. I wish
government as he implanted the concept of municipal authorities as units of this endeavour evokes spontaneous support from the discerning citizens of
self-government. His Resolution of 18 May 1882 on local self-government Mumbai in general and the leaders of the political parties in particular.
dealt with the constitution of local bodies, their functions, finances and
powers and laid the foundation of local self-government in modern India. D M SuKHTANKAR,
After Independence, the Constitution of India was framed on federal former Municipal Commissioner,
principles. Indian Constitution makers divided the government functions Mumbai and former Chief Secretary,
into three lists: Central, State and Concurrent. Local government bodies are Government of Maharashtra
covered in the State List and are governed by the State statutes or in the
case of Union Territories by the Union Parliament. The 12th Schedule of the
Constitution introduced by the 73rd and 74th Amendments of the Constitution
seeks to provide more power and authority to the local government bodies
and lists the functions of urban local bodies, covering planning, regulation
and development aspects.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) is the most crucial
institution for governance in the lives of Mumbaikars. It is ‘Governed’ by
the 227 elected municipal councillors, whom the citizens elect every five
years. Under the mandate that they receive, the municipal councillors are
duty bound to ensure smooth and efficient delivery of municipal services.
In the past, luminaries like Pherozeshah Mehta amongst many others have
represented the city; and have strived to not only ensure municipal services
but also have provided a vision to develop the city to offer the highest
standards of living.
The city is administratively divided into 24 wards and the MCGM has
specific ‘central’ departments, such as water supply and sewerage, which
are centrally managed. The 1888 Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act gives
the obligatory and discretionary duties of the MCGM in great details.
For any attempt to asses and monitor the performance of municipal
councillors, the scale needs to be based on the parameters embedded in
the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and the role of urban local
bodies as envisaged in the Constitution of India. Hence, while deciding the
14 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 15
10. aS Se S S i n g T H e p e r f o rMa n Ce o f
vçiçjmçíJçkçÀçb®³çç kçÀçcççÆiçjçÇ®çí JçmlçáçÆvçÿ cçÓu³çcççHçvç Mun iC i pa l Co u nC i l l o rs o b j eC T i v e ly
Yççjlççlç mçO³çç jçpçkçÀçdzç Hçá{çN³ççb®³çç çÆJçjçíOççÇ pçvçcçlç lç³ççj Pççuçí Dççní. HçCç Kçjç ÒçMvç DççHçCç ³çç jçpçkçÀçjCççÇ The air in India is thick with criticism of politicians. The question that arises
is: how can the performance of our elected representatives be assessed
uççíkçÀçb®³çç kçÀçcççÆiçjçÇ®çí JçmlçáçÆvçÿ cçÓu³çcççHçvç kçÀmçí kçÀjCççj nç Dççní. ³ççmççþçÇ l³ççbvçç l³ççb®³çç kçÀçcççyçÎuç kçÀç³ç objectively? Surely the right way cannot be by asking them for their opinion
Jççìlçí ní çÆJç®ççjCçí Hçájímçí vççnçÇ. çÆkçbÀJçç kçÀçnçÇ jçpçkçÀçdzç lç%ç cçb[UçRvçç cçÓu³çcççHçvç kçÀjç³çuçç mççbiçCçínçÇ ³ççíi³ç of themselves. Nor is it adequate to get a few political pundits (who may have
þjCççj vççnçÇ (l³ççb®çç mJçlç:®ççnçÇ kçÀçnçÇ SkçÀ kçÀuç DçmçÓ MçkçÀlççí). their own angles) to evaluate them.
HççjoMç&kçÀ DçççÆCç HçOolçMççÇj mJçªHç箳çç DçY³ççmççlçÓvç uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççR®çí mçcçlççíuç, HçÓJç&ûçnçÆJçjçÆnlç DçççÆCç The only way such an assessment can be done in a manner that is, and is
seen to be, unbiased and credible, is through a systematic and transparent
çÆJçéççmççn& cçÓu³çcççHçvç kçÀjCçí Mçkçw³ç Dççní. DçççÆCç Dçmçí cçÓu³çcççHçvç kçÀjCçí nç Òçpçç ÒçiçlççÇ HçámlçkçÀ箳çç kçÀçcçç®çç study undertaken independently by respected professionals. That is precisely
nílçÓ Dççní. what The Praja Report Card seeks to accomplish.
vçiçjmçíJçkçÀçb®çí cçÓu³çcççHçvç Hçá{çÇuç iççíäçRJçj DççOçççÆjlç Dççní: The ratings of the Municipal Councillors’s are based on:
(Dç) cçnçvçiçjHçççÆuçkçíÀ®³çç çÆJççÆJçOç mççÆcçlççÇ yçÌþkçÀçbvçç GHççÆmLçlççÇ, çÆJç®ççjuçíu³çç ÒçMvççb®ççÇ mçbK³çç Jç ÒçkçÀçj (a) Data accessed through RTI on attendance of different Committee Meetings
of the Municipal Corporation, number and type of questions raised, use of
vçiçjmçíJçkçÀ çÆvçOççÇ®çç çÆJççÆvç³ççíiç Fl³ççoçÇ cçççÆnlççÇ DççÆOçkçÀçjçKççuççÇ çÆcçUJçuçíuççÇ cçççÆnlççÇ. discretionary funds, etc.
(yç) cçábyçF&lççÇuç 28,707 vççiççÆjkçÀçb®³çç Jç̳ççqkçwlçkçÀ cçáuççKçlççÇ - ³çç cçáuççKçlççÇ SkçÀç cççv³çJçj (b) Personal interviews with 28,707 citizens of Mumbai conducted by a
mçbMççíOçvç mçbmLçívçí Içílçu³çç DçmçÓvç vççiççÆjkçÀçb®ççÇ uççíkçÀÒççÆlççÆvçOççRçÆJç<ç³ççÇ cçlçí pççCçÓvç IçíCçí nç l³çç®çç reputed survey research organisation, to investigate the views of citizens
GÎíMç nçílçç. on their elected representatives.
We believe the Report Card is an important step forward in promoting
jçp³çkçÀçjYççjçcçO³çí GÊçjoççƳçlJç Jç HççjoMç&kçÀlçç nçÇ cçÓu³çí ªpçC³ççmççþçÇ ÒçiçlççÇ HçámlçkçÀçb®çç GHç¬çÀcç cçolçkçÀçjkçÀ accountability and transparency in the political governance of the country.
þjíuç Dçmçç Dççcnçuçç çÆJçéççmç Jççìlççí.
kçíÀ.Scç.Smç. (ìçÇì§) DçnuçáJçççÆuç³çç K.M.S. (TIToo) AHluwAlIA,
Formerly Chairman & CEO of A.C. Nielsen ORG-MARG
cççpççÇ DçO³ç#ç DçççÆCç mççÇF&Dççí - S.mççÇ. vççÇuçmçvç DççíDççjpççÇ-cççiç&
18 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 19
11. Note:
The ranking for Councillors for Constituency nos. 11, 86 & 169 is not available as
the councillors are either the Mayor (Sr. No. 1), has been suspended during the period
(Sr. No. 2) or has been recently elected (Sr. No. 3).
MuniCipal
parTy deTailS
CounCillor
Sr. No. 1 : Shradha S. Jadhav
MUMBAI’S Age: 46
227 COUNCILLORs
Edu.: HSC
Ward : F/South
Area: C.G.S. Colony, Sector-7
AND THEIR
Constituency No. 169
Member: Ward Committee F/South and F/North
SS
RANKINGS
Sr. No. 2 : Sunil S. Chavan
Age: 57
Edu.: B.A.
Ward : R/Central
A
Area: Banshi Nagar, Tata Power Road
Constituency No. 11
SS Member : Ward Committee H/East and H/West
Sr. No. 3 : Suryavansh Thakur
Age: 57
B photo
Edu.: Eighth
Ward : H/East
Area: T.P.S. - 3, Santacruz - Ashok Nagar
not available Constituency No. 86
i nC Member : Ward Committee H/East and H/West
E
C F
While reading the ratings of the councillors in the next pages kindly note the following:
(1) The parameter indicating Quality of Questions is summation of scores for ‘Importance
of questions asked by issues raised in the question’ (max. marks - 18) and ‘Issues raised
compared to citizen’s Complaints’ (max. marks - 10).
D (2) The grades are given based on actual percentage of marks earned for the particlar
parameter and is given as below:
(a) Grade ‘A’ – Between 100% to 80%.
(b) Grade ‘B’ – Less than 80% but more than or equal to 70%
(c) Grade ‘C’ – Less than 70% but more than or equal to 60%
(d) Grade ‘D’ – Less than 60% but more than or equal to 50%
(e) Grade ‘E’ – Less than 50% but more than or equal to 35%
(f) Grade ‘F’ – Less than 35%
20 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 21
12. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
C 60.75 #109 D 8.24 F 2.88 C 17.69 A 5.00 C 20.95
in C
Sheetal A. Age: 33 yrs, Edu.: Bachelor of Architecture, Member: Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
Mhatre Ward: R/North, Area: Kandarpada - I. C. Colony, Constituency No.: 1
b 70.01 #42 A 12.30 D 8.40 D 16.74 A 5.00 C 20.56
SS
Bhalchandra C. Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
Mhatre Ward: R/North, Area: Gaondevi - Dahisar (East), Constituency No.: 2
C 65.51 #77 A 13.19 A 14.52 C 17.27 F -5.00 C 19.53
in C
Rajendra P. Age: 57 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc., Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and R/North,
Chaube Ward: R/North, Area: Ketkipada - Shailendra Nagar, Constituency No.: 3 Standing Committee
C 65.04 #81 A 13.93 F 4.97 D 15.60 A 5.00 C 20.54
SS
Bhavana B. Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC, Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
Bhagat Ward: R/North, Area: Vaishali Nagar, Constituency No.: 4
22 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 23
13. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
d 54.57 #156 B 10.96 E 6.26 F 6.00 A 5.00 C 19.36
SS
Sujata u. Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: B.Com., Ward: R/North Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and R/North,
Patekar Area: Ashokvan - Chintamani Nagar, Constituency No.: 5 Education Committee
b 74.39 #19 A 13.28 D 8.40 C 19.33 A 5.00 B 22.38
SS
Prakash K. Age: 49 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
Karkar Ward: R/North, Area: Ambawadi - Ovari Pada, Constituency No.: 6
C 65.42 #79 E 5.96 C 9.95 D 15.93 A 5.00 B 21.58
SS
Shubha u. Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: B.A.M.S., M.D. Ayurved, Member: Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
Raul Ward: R/North, Area: Mandapeshwar, Constituency No.: 7
C 69.38 #47 A 13.64 C 9.21 D 16.45 A 5.00 C 18.08
SS
Sadanand N. Age: 62 yrs, Edu.: Eleventh, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Markets and Gardens Committee,
Surve Ward: R/Central, Area: Gorai - M.H.B. Colony (New), Constituency No.: 8 Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
24 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 25
14. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
C 63.87 #90 A 13.35 F 3.77 C 19.19 A 5.00 D 17.57
bjp
Vinod Ghedia Age: 73 yrs, Edu.: Not given, Member: Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
Ward: R/Central, Area: Govind Nagar, Constituency No.: 9
C 67.54 #61 B 11.51 B 11.43 E 12.06 A 5.00 C 20.55
nCp
Bhaskar N. Age: 41 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
Khursange Ward: R/Central, Area: Daulat Nagar, Nancy Colony, Constituency No.: 10
C 67.32 #63 A 13.24 C 9.21 E 13.21 A 5.00 C 20.66
in C
Vinay G. Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: Seventh, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and
Patil Ward: R/Central, Area: Datta Pada, Constituency No.: 12 R/North, Improvements Committee
b 72.96 #26 A 13.55 A 12.11 D 14.64 A 5.00 B 22.67
SS
Aparna A. Age: 55 yrs, Edu.: Upto Eighth, Ward: R/Central, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Women and Child Welfare Committee,
Narvekar Area: Rajendra Nagar, Khatav Estate, Constituency No.: 13 Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
26 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 27
15. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
d 58.27 #132 C 10.14 E 6.26 E 9.84 A 5.00 C 20.03
bjp
Pravin Shah Age: 55 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
Ward: R/Central, Area: Borivali TPS 3 - Kora Kendra, Constituency No.: 14
a 82.94 #2 A 13.77 A 14.33 B 20.92 A 5.00 B 21.92
bjp
Mohan R. Age: 64 yrs, Edu.: B.A. (Economic), B.Com. Member: Works Committee (Suburbs) , Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and
Mithbaokar Ward: R/Central, Area: Eksar - Yogi Nagar, Constituency No.: 15 R/North, Standing Committee, Improvements Committee
d 59.21 #122 C 9.11 E 6.26 E 10.30 A 5.00 B 21.54
bjp
Bharati J. Age: 32 yrs, Edu.: B.Com., Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and R/North
Keni Ward: R/Central, Area: Chikuwadi - Kanti Park, Constituency No.: 16
C 65.62 #76 A 14.61 E 7.05 D 15.59 A 5.00 D 17.36
nCp
Sandhya V. Age: 35 yrs, Edu.: Upto T.Y.B.Com., Ward: R/Central, Member: Ward Committee R/Central and R/North, Improvements Committee
Doshi (Sakre) Area: Charkop (North), M.H.B. Colony (New), Constituency No.: 17
28 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 29
16. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
C 65.18 #80 E 7.49 D 7.53 D 15.13 A 5.00 B 23.03
SS
Shubhada S. Age: 60 yrs, Edu.: Eleventh, Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee R/South and Education Committee
Gudhekar Ward: R/South, Area: Charkop (South), Constituency No.: 18
d 59.48 #121 A 12.92 A 12.65 E 11.85 F -5.00 C 20.06
in C
Kamlesh S. Age: 43 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Member: Ward Committee R/South, Education Committee
Yadav Ward: R/South, Area: Charkop Industrial Estate, Constituency No.: 19
d 51.94 #167 D 7.59 F 4.97 F 6.00 A 5.00 B 21.39
bjp
Shailaja V. Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: Eleventh, Member: Ward Committee R/South
Girkar Ward: R/South, Area: Mahavir Nagar - Dhanukar Wadi, Constituency No.: 20
e 39.61 #204 E 6.51 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5.00 B 21.10
in C
Rajul N. Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc., G.C.D., D.F.M, Ward: R/South, Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Ward Committee R/South
Vyas Area: Narwane Sanskrutik Centre - Aarya Chanakya Nagar, Constituency No.: 21
30 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 31
17. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
in d e p e n d e n T
d 56.15 #147 C 9.97 F 2.21 D 14.18 A 5.00 C 18.79
Shivkumar Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: Eighth, Ward: R/South, Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee,
V. Jha Area: Poisar Village (West) - Kandivali (East), Constituency No.: 22 Ward Committee R/South
C 64.26 #89 C 9.46 E 7.05 D 14.59 A 5.00 B 22.16
SS
Ashok V. Age: 56 yrs, Edu.: Eleventh, Ward: R/South, Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Ward Committee R/South
Sawant Area: Poisar (East), Rajaram Nagar - Ashok Nagar, Constituency No.: 23
C 65.94 #75 D 7.51 E 6.26 C 17.20 A 5.00 B 22.98
SS
Kshitija u. Age: 45 yrs, Edu.: B.Com., Ward: R/South, Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee,
Pujare Area: Samata Nagar - Dattani Park - Mahindra & Mahindra Company, Constituency No.: 24 Ward Committee R/South
d 51.10 #172 F 2.29 F 4.97 F 8.70 A 5.00 B 23.14
in C
Ramesh S. Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Member: Ward Committee R/South
Thakur Ward: R/South, Area: Damupada, Constituency No.: 25
32 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 33
18. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
C 66.70 #69 B 11.89 B 10.56 F 9.70 A 5.00 B 22.54
in C
Ajanta R. Age: 43 yrs, Edu.: B.H.M.S., Ward: R/South, Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee R/South, Education Committee
Yadav Area: Vadarpada Colony - Gautam Nagar, Constituency No.: 26
d 55.79 #151 D 8.14 C 9.95 D 15.83 F -5.00 C 19.88
bjp
Yogesh A. Age: 48 yrs, Edu.: F.Y.J.C, Ward: R/South, Member: Ward Committee R/South, Standing Committee
Sagar Area: Devji Bhimji Colony - Paras Nagar, Constituency No.: 27
d 52.97 #162 B 11.83 F 4.97 E 10.27 F -5.00 B 23.91
in C
Geeta A. Age: 35 yrs, Edu.: D.H.M.S., Ward: R/South, Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee R/South
Yadav Area: Iraniwadi - Kandivali (West), Constituency No.: 28
C 66.98 #66 A 12.35 A 12.65 E 13.91 A 5.00 C 18.08
SS
Renuka Age: 34 yrs, Edu.: Ninth, Ward: P/North, Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee P/North
P. Dive Area: Manori - Marve Erangel - Aksa - Daravali Village - Madh Island, Constituency No.: 29
34 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 35
19. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
e 48.33 #190 B 10.74 F 0.93 F 6.00 A 5.00 C 19.66
in C
Suvarna P. Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: Eighth, Ward: P/North, Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Ward Committee P/North
Madhyalkar Area: Valnai Village - Kharodi Village - Malavani Colony, Constituency No.: 30
e 49.98 #179 B 10.51 F 2.88 F 6.00 A 5.00 C 19.58
in C
Jaya Satnam Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: S.Y.J.C., Ward: P/North, Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Ward Committee P/North
Singh Tiwana Area: Adarsh Dugdhalaya - Evershine Nagar, Constituency No.: 31
C 64.73 #84 C 10.12 A 13.17 E 12.30 A 5.00 C 18.14
in C
Baldevsingh Age: 43 yrs, Edu.: Sixth, Ward: P/North, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee P/North, Improvements Committee
G. Mankoo Area: Bhadaran Nagar - Mamalatdar Wadi, Constituency No.: 32
C 60.60 #111 C 10.39 F 4.97 D 14.64 A 5.00 C 18.60
bjp
Ramnarayan Age: 65 yrs, Edu.: SSC, L.C.EH, Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee P/North, Education Committee, Tree Committee
A. Barot Ward: P/North, Area: Pushpa Park, Constituency No.: 33
36 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 37
20. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
e 43.35 #199 A 12.46 F 4.97 F 6.71 F -5.00 C 19.22
Mn S
Vanita M. Age: 58 yrs, Edu.: Seventh, Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee,
Ghag Ward: P/North, Area: Tanaji Nagar, Constituency No.: 34 Ward Committee P/North
f 34.64 #214 F 5.17 F 0.93 F 6.00 F -5.00 C 20.54
in C
Bhomsingh Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Ward Committee P/North, Education Committee
Rathod Ward: P/North, Area: Appa Pada, Constituency No.: 35
b 71.77 #32 B 11.46 C 9.95 C 18.75 A 5.00 C 19.62
nCp
Vidya A. Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Commercial Arts, G. D. Arts, Ceramic Artist, Member: Ward Committee P/North, Improvements Committee
Chavan Ward: P/North, Area: Malad Hill Reservoir, Constituency No.: 36
C 66.58 #71 A 12.72 A 14.19 E 12.89 F 0.00 C 20.79
SS
Sadashiv D. Age: 49 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC, Ward: P/North, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee P/North
Patil Area: Municipal colony Malad (East), Constituency No.: 37
38 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 39
21. no. of QualiTy of leaST CriMinal perCeived
ToTal aTTendanCe
MuniCipal QueSTionS QueSTionS reCord perforManCe
parTy grade SCore rank
CounCillor actual actual actual actual actual
% grade grade grade grade grade
out of 15 out of 15 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30
C 66.50 #72 B 10.70 C 9.21 D 15.31 A 5.00 C 19.28
nCp
Ajit B. Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: F.Y.J.C., Ward: P/North, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee P/North
Raorane Area: Dhanjiwadi - Narsobawadi - Kokanipada, Constituency No.: 38
C 60.55 #112 A 13.70 E 6.26 C 17.65 F 0.00 D 16.95
SS
Ganpat B. Age: 61 yrs, Edu.: Seventh, Ward: P/North, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee P/North
Varise Area: Pimpri Pada - Pathanwadi, Constituency No.: 39
b 79.11 #3 A 14.04 A 13.17 C 17.64 A 5.00 B 22.26
bjp
Gyanmurti R. Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc., L.L.B., Ward: P/North, Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Ward Committee P/North
Sharma Area: Raheja Complex - Dindoshi, Constituency No.: 40
e 48.20 #191 D 8.52 F 0.93 F 6.00 A 5.00 C 20.75
in C
Dikshita Age: 38 yrs, Edu.: S.Y.B.Com., Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Ward Committee P/North
J. Shah Ward: P/North, Area: Makrani Pada, Constituency No.: 41
40 M U M B A I R E P O R T C A R D M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L L O R S 2 0 1 1 41