SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 13
Parameters for Rating MLAs (1/4)

                      Parameter                                          Marks
Past1                                                               8
Present 2                                                           52
Perception (through an opinion poll of 14,561 people)               40
Negative for new FIR cases after 2009 election    3
                                                                    Minus 5
Negative for pending Charge Sheet 3                                 Minus 5
                          Total                                           100


RTI Data Source: 1 Election Commission of India’s Website;   2
                                                                 Vidhan Bhavan and
City & Suburban Collector Offices; 3 Mumbai Police.


2
Parameters for Rating MLAs (3/4)

                                            Past Parameter
                                            (Marks)
Education Qualification                                                              1
A minimum of 10th Pass - 1; if not – 0
Income Tax                                                                           2
!) Possessing PAN Card - 1
2) Disclosing income in affidavit – 1
Criminal Record                                                                      5
If the candidate has zero cases registered against her/him, then 5; else as below:
1) Criminal Cases Registered containing the following charges: Murder, Rape,
Molestation, Riot, Extortion - 0
2) Other criminal cases than the above mentioned – 3




 3
Parameters for Rating MLAs (2/4)
                                       Present Parameter
                                          (Marks)
Sessions Attended                                                                        10
Based on percentage of attendance. 1) 100% to 91%- 10; 2) 90% to 76% - 8; 3) 75%
to 61% -6; 4) 60% to 51% - 4; and 5) below 50% - 0
Number of Questions Asked                                                                16
Against Group Percentage Rank.
16 being the top most percentile and so on to the lowest for 1
Importance of questions asked                                                            21
Weightage is given to issues raised through the questions depending on whether they
belong to the State List, Central List or are in the domain of Municipal Authority.
In the aggregate scale (out of 100) the following weightage is given: Constituency
(including City) gets 5; State gets 15; and National gets 1
Total Local Area Development Funds Utilised during Dec'2009 to                           5
March'2012
Calculation for the current financial year is done for the sanctioned fund of Rs. 3.75
crore approved till March 2012.1) 100% (or more) to 91%- 5; 2) 90% to 76% - 4; 3)
75% to 61% -3; 4) 60% to 51% - 2; and 5) below 50% - 0
 4
Importance of Question
   Step 1: Issues are given certain weightages depending on them being

    prime functions of the State Legislature or of the Municipal bodies or

    the Centre.

   Step 2: Further questions asked are categorised into:
           City and Constituency based

           State based

           Nation based

        Based on the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India.
                                                                                     Back

        Overall weightage is given in the ratio of 5:15:1 in the above categories.

    5
Parameters for Rating MLAs (4/4)

                                      Perception Parameter
                                           (Marks)
Perception of Public Services                                                         20
Score on Public Services
Awareness & Accessibility                                                             6
Score on Awareness amongst people about their representative, their political party
and ease of access to the representative
Corruption Index                                                                      10
Score on perceived personal corruption of the representative
Broad Measures                                                                        4
Score on overall satisfaction and improvement in quality of life




 6
7
Key Highlights of MLA RC 2012


                      2011      2012
      Total Scores   1959.25   2034.84
     Maximum Score    75.43     72.51
     Minimum Score    47.01     53.73
     Average Score    61.23     63.59
         Spread       28.42     18.78




8
Reasons for movement in ranks between years 2011 and 2012

               MLA Name                     Party   Rank 2012                    Main Reason                  Rank 2011   Move
        Yogesh Amrutlal Sagar                BJP        1             Questions Asked, People's Perception        4         3
            Mangesh Sangle                  MNS         2                 New Crimininal Record (FIR)             1         -1
          Amin Amir Ali Patel                INC        3               Attendance, People's Perception          10         7
    Madhukar Balkrishna Chavan               INC        4                                                         7         3
      Jagannath Achanna Shetty               INC        5                       Questions Asked                   2         -3
         Ramesh Singh Thakur                 INC        6             Questions Asked, Quality of Questions      12         6
       Bala Dagdu Nandgaonkar               MNS         7                         Attendance                     14         7
        Subhash Rajaram Desai                 SS        8                     People's Perception                 6         -2
           Kalidas Kolambkar                 INC        9                     People's Perception                 8         -1
            Vinod Ghosalkar                   SS       10                         Attendance                     15         5
         Milind Bhupal Kamble               NCP        11                                                         9         -2
       Aslam Ramzan Ali Shaikh               INC       12             Questions Asked, Quality of Questions      29         17
             Rajhans Singh                   INC       13                     People's Perception                25         12
              Nawab Malik                   NCP        14                       Questions Asked                   5         -9
           Sardar Tara Singh                 BJP       15             New Crimininal Record (Chargesheet)         3        -12
        Mangal Prabhat Lodha                 BJP       16                         Attendance                     11         -5
      Baldev  Basantsingh Khosa              INC       17             Questions Asked, Quality of Questions      27         10
    Krishnakumar Shripad Hegde               INC       18                                                        20         2
             Shishir Shinde                 MNS        19                       Questions Asked                  31         12
      Ravindra Dattaram Waikar                SS       20                                                        17         -3
          Ramchandra Kadam                  MNS        21                       Questions Asked                  30         9
          Ashok Bhau Jadhav                  INC       22                       Questions Asked                  13         -9
     Annie  Sitambalam Shekhar               INC       23                     Quality of Question                21         -2
             Pravin Darekar                 MNS        24                                                        19         -5
              Gopal Shetty                   BJP       25                     Quality of Question                22         -3
            Abu Asim Azmi                     SP       26               Attendance, Quality of Question          26         0
            Prakash Sawant                    SS       27                Attendance, Questions Asked             16        -11
          Kripashankar Singh                 INC       28                                                        23         -5
             Nitin Sardesai                 MNS        29                       Questions Asked                  18        -11
Sidikki Ziyauddin Abdul Rahim (Baba)         INC       30                         Attendance                     28         -2
   Prakash Manchhubhai Maheta                BJP       31                     People's Perception                32         1
         Chandrakant Handore                 INC       32                Questions Asked, Attendance             24         -8
Attend       Question     Quality     Perceive     Perceive     Perceiv       Crimin       Rank        Mo   Score       Mov
                     ance         s Asked      of          d            d            ed            al                       ve               eme
                                               Questio     Perform      Accessi      Corrup        Record                   me               nt
                                               ns          er           bility       tion                                   nt

  MLA Name
                    Scor
                    es Ran Scores Ran Scores Ran Scores Ran Score     Score Ran Score Ran
                    (10) k (16)    k (21)     k (20)     k s (6) Rank s (10) k s (5)   k 2012 2011                               2012 2011

Yogesh Sagar           8 20 12.38            8 12.67 13 12.85 21 2.95          24 8.05         6     5      1     1     4     3 72.51 71.16 1.35
Mangesh Sangle         8 20 15.47 2 12.44 19 13.51 13 3.90                         9 7.95 7          0 16         2     1    -1 72.15 75.43 -3.28
Amin Patel            10 1 8.26 16 11.93 27 13.73 6 4.31                           3 7.35 14         5 1          3    10     7 71.25 62.53 8.72
Madhukar Chavan       10 1 7.22 18 12.23 22 13.67 9 4.28                           5 7.47 12         5 1          4     7     3 71.01 67.82 3.19
Jagannath Shetty      10      1    6.19 20 12.01 26 14.09             2 4.01       7 6.96 28         5      1     5     2    -3 69.00 71.46 -2.46
Ramesh Thakur          8 20        7.73 17 12.65 15 13.89             3 3.16   20 7.70         8     5      1     6    12     6 68.59 62.17 6.43
Bala Nandgaonkar      10      1 16.00        1 12.71 12 14.38         1 3.76   11 6.38 30           -7 29         7    14     7 66.98 61.96 5.02
Subhash Desai         10      1 14.96        3 12.98     4 12.34 26 3.44       18 7.25 20           -5 20         8     6    -2 66.53 68.33 -1.80
Kalidas Kolambkar     10      1    3.60 25 12.84         9 13.02 20 3.77       10 7.55 10            5      1     9     8    -1 66.47 65.88 0.59
Vinod Ghosalkar       10      1 13.92        5 12.77 10 13.13 17 3.56          17 7.35 14           -5 20        10    15     5 66.37 61.39 4.99
Milind Kamble         10      1    2.58 26 12.95         5 13.49 15 3.05       21 8.13         3     5      1    11     9    -2 65.23 64.46 0.77

Aslam Shaikh          10      1    9.79 13 12.99         3 12.25 27 3.63       16 7.49 11           -2 17        12    29    17 64.62 54.71 9.91
Rajhans Singh          8 20        4.13 23 11.75 29 13.26 16 2.44              30 9.10         1     5      1    13    25    12 64.23 56.63 7.60
Nawab Malik           10      1    2.58 26 12.95         5 13.11 18 2.85       25 7.12 23            5      1    14     5    -9 64.07 69.27 -5.20
Sardar Tara Singh     10      1 12.90        7 12.47 17 13.65 11 3.98              8 6.19 31        -5 20        15     3 -12 63.91 71.22 -7.30
         10
Attend    Question   Quality    Perceive     Perceive    Perceiv   Crimin       Rank        M    Score       Mo
                      ance      s Asked    of         d            d           ed        al                       ov               ve
                                           Questio    Perform      Accessi     Corrup    Record                   e                me
                                           ns         er           bility      tion                               m                nt
                                                                                                                  en
                                                                                                                  t
  MLA Name

                     Scor
                     es Ran Scores Ran Scores Ran Scores Ran Score     Score Ran Score Ran
                     (10) k (16)    k (21)     k (20)     k s (6) Rank s (10) k s (5) k 2012 2011                      2012 2011
Mangal Prabhat
Lodha                   8 20 11.34 10 12.77 11 12.45 25 3.00              23 7.31 18      -2 17        16    11    -5 63.52 62.47 1.05
Baldev Khosa            8 20 1.54 29 12.04 24 12.71 22 5.13                1 8.05 4        5 1         17    27    10 63.20 55.13 8.07
Krishnakumar
Hegde                 10    1    4.13   23 12.92    7 10.90   32   2.05   32   7.38   13   5 1         18    20   2 62.59 59.03 3.56
Shishir Shinde         8   20   10.83   11 12.66   14 13.66   10   4.15    6   7.63    9 -5 20         19    31 12 62.51 52.18 10.33
Ravindra Waikar       10    1   14.45    4 12.87    8 11.62   30   2.81   27   7.04   24 -7 29         20    17 -3 62.35 60.58 1.77
Ramchandra Kadam      10    1   11.86    9 12.46   18 12.63   24   3.69   12   7.34   17 -7 29         21    30   9 62.10 52.97 9.13
Ashok Bhau Jadhav     10    1    5.66   21 11.78   28 13.73    6   4.31    3   7.35   14 -2 17         22    13 -9 61.50 62.07 -0.56
Annie Shekhar          8   20    1.02   30 13.33    1 13.56   12   3.35   19   7.24   21   5 1         23    21 -2 61.39 58.76 2.64
Pravin Darekar         8   20   13.41    6 12.51   16 12.71   22   5.13    1   8.05    4 -10 32        24    19 -5 60.54 59.33 1.21
Gopal Shetty          10    1    9.28   14 12.09   23 13.75    4   3.64   13   7.01   25 -5 20         25    22 -3 60.52 58.73 1.79
Abu Asim Azmi         10    1    6.70   19 13.23    2 13.75    4   3.64   13   7.01   25 -5 20         26    26   0 60.08 56.13 3.95
Prakash Sawant         6   30   10.32   12 12.40   20 13.70    8   2.52   29   8.33    2 -5 20         27    16 -11 59.16 60.61 -1.45
Kripashankar Singh     6   30    2.06   28 11.74   30 13.05   19   3.03   22   7.31   19   5 1         28    23 -5 58.93 58.09 0.84
Nitin Sardesai        10    1    8.77   15 12.27   21 11.62   31   2.15   31   6.98   27 -5 20         29    18 -11 57.36 59.59 -2.23
Ziyauddin Sidikki     10    1    0.51   31 10.45   32 12.02   28   2.83   26   5.86   32   5 1         30    28 -2 57.11 54.90 2.21
Prakash Maheta         8   20    5.15   22 12.01   25 13.50   14   3.63   15   7.19   22 -5 20         31    32   1 55.33 47.01 8.32
Chandrakant
Handore                 6 30     0.00 32 11.25 31 11.92 29 2.68           28 6.69 29       5      1    32    24    -8 53.73 57.27 -3.54
          11
MLA Name                         Total Question    MLA Name                       Total Question
Abu Asim Azmi                          157         Mangesh Eknath Sangle                923
Amin Amir Ali Patel                    296         Milind Bhupal Kamble                  38
Annie  Sitambalam Shekhar              24          Nawab Malik                          38
Ashok Bhau Jadhav                      136         Nitin Vijaykumar Sardesai            337
Aslam Ramzan Ali Shaikh                422         Prakash Manchhubhai Maheta           117

Ziyauddin Abdul Rahim Sidikki          22          Prakash (Bala) Vasant Sawant         424
Baldev  Basantsingh Khosa              27          Pravin Yashwanr Darekar              681
Bala Dagdu Nandgaonkar                1165         Rajhans Dhananjay Singh              77
Chandrakant Handore                     8          Ramchandra Shivaji Kadam             515

Gopal Chinaiya Shetty                  392         Ramesh Singh Thakur                  270
Jagannath Achanna Shetty               137         Ravindra Dattaram Waikar             750
Kalidas Nilkanth Kolambkar             74          Sardar Tara Singh                    645
Kripashankar Singh                     35          Shishir Krishnarao Shinde            455
Krishnakumar Shripad Hegde             77          Subhash Rajaram Desai                868
Mangal Prabhat Lodha                   486         Vinod Ramchandra Ghosalkar           716

Madhukar Balkrishna Chavan             191         Yogesh Sagar                         546
        12
                          Total                                            11049
Total Score            Average Rank          Average Score
Political Party
    Name                              Inc.                 Inc.                    Inc.
                  2011     2012              2011   2012           2011    2012
                                      (%)                  (%)                     (%)

    BJP (5)       311      316    1.67        14     18    22.22   62.12   63.16   1.67


   INC (14)       846      894    5.57        18     16    -10.84 60.46    63.83   5.57


   MNS (6)        361      382    5.59        19     17    -9.73   60.24   63.61   5.59


   NCP (2)        134      129    -3.31       7      13    78.57   66.87   64.65   -3.31


    SP (1)         56       60    7.04        26     26    0.00    56.13   60.08   7.04


    SS (4)        251      254    1.40        14     16    20.37   62.72   63.60   1.40


   13

Más contenido relacionado

Más de Milind Mhaske

Ward wise top issue white paper
Ward wise top issue white paperWard wise top issue white paper
Ward wise top issue white paperMilind Mhaske
 
Ward wise top issue white paper
Ward wise top issue white paperWard wise top issue white paper
Ward wise top issue white paperMilind Mhaske
 
Councillors report card 2011
Councillors report card 2011Councillors report card 2011
Councillors report card 2011Milind Mhaske
 
Councillor report card 2011
Councillor report card 2011Councillor report card 2011
Councillor report card 2011Milind Mhaske
 
Councillor report card 2011
Councillor report card 2011Councillor report card 2011
Councillor report card 2011Milind Mhaske
 
Mumbai Report Card MLA Ratings 2011
Mumbai Report Card MLA Ratings 2011Mumbai Report Card MLA Ratings 2011
Mumbai Report Card MLA Ratings 2011Milind Mhaske
 
Praja Foundation's - Ward committee White Paper 2011
Praja Foundation's - Ward committee White Paper 2011Praja Foundation's - Ward committee White Paper 2011
Praja Foundation's - Ward committee White Paper 2011Milind Mhaske
 

Más de Milind Mhaske (10)

Ward wise top issue white paper
Ward wise top issue white paperWard wise top issue white paper
Ward wise top issue white paper
 
Ward wise top issue white paper
Ward wise top issue white paperWard wise top issue white paper
Ward wise top issue white paper
 
Crime 2011
Crime 2011Crime 2011
Crime 2011
 
Crime white paper
Crime white  paperCrime white  paper
Crime white paper
 
Councillors report card 2011
Councillors report card 2011Councillors report card 2011
Councillors report card 2011
 
Councillor report card 2011
Councillor report card 2011Councillor report card 2011
Councillor report card 2011
 
Councillor report card 2011
Councillor report card 2011Councillor report card 2011
Councillor report card 2011
 
Mumbai Report Card MLA Ratings 2011
Mumbai Report Card MLA Ratings 2011Mumbai Report Card MLA Ratings 2011
Mumbai Report Card MLA Ratings 2011
 
Health white paper
Health white paperHealth white paper
Health white paper
 
Praja Foundation's - Ward committee White Paper 2011
Praja Foundation's - Ward committee White Paper 2011Praja Foundation's - Ward committee White Paper 2011
Praja Foundation's - Ward committee White Paper 2011
 

MLA Report Card 2012

  • 1.
  • 2. Parameters for Rating MLAs (1/4) Parameter Marks Past1 8 Present 2 52 Perception (through an opinion poll of 14,561 people) 40 Negative for new FIR cases after 2009 election 3 Minus 5 Negative for pending Charge Sheet 3 Minus 5 Total 100 RTI Data Source: 1 Election Commission of India’s Website; 2 Vidhan Bhavan and City & Suburban Collector Offices; 3 Mumbai Police. 2
  • 3. Parameters for Rating MLAs (3/4) Past Parameter (Marks) Education Qualification 1 A minimum of 10th Pass - 1; if not – 0 Income Tax 2 !) Possessing PAN Card - 1 2) Disclosing income in affidavit – 1 Criminal Record 5 If the candidate has zero cases registered against her/him, then 5; else as below: 1) Criminal Cases Registered containing the following charges: Murder, Rape, Molestation, Riot, Extortion - 0 2) Other criminal cases than the above mentioned – 3 3
  • 4. Parameters for Rating MLAs (2/4) Present Parameter (Marks) Sessions Attended 10 Based on percentage of attendance. 1) 100% to 91%- 10; 2) 90% to 76% - 8; 3) 75% to 61% -6; 4) 60% to 51% - 4; and 5) below 50% - 0 Number of Questions Asked 16 Against Group Percentage Rank. 16 being the top most percentile and so on to the lowest for 1 Importance of questions asked 21 Weightage is given to issues raised through the questions depending on whether they belong to the State List, Central List or are in the domain of Municipal Authority. In the aggregate scale (out of 100) the following weightage is given: Constituency (including City) gets 5; State gets 15; and National gets 1 Total Local Area Development Funds Utilised during Dec'2009 to 5 March'2012 Calculation for the current financial year is done for the sanctioned fund of Rs. 3.75 crore approved till March 2012.1) 100% (or more) to 91%- 5; 2) 90% to 76% - 4; 3) 75% to 61% -3; 4) 60% to 51% - 2; and 5) below 50% - 0 4
  • 5. Importance of Question  Step 1: Issues are given certain weightages depending on them being prime functions of the State Legislature or of the Municipal bodies or the Centre.  Step 2: Further questions asked are categorised into:  City and Constituency based  State based  Nation based Based on the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. Back Overall weightage is given in the ratio of 5:15:1 in the above categories. 5
  • 6. Parameters for Rating MLAs (4/4) Perception Parameter (Marks) Perception of Public Services 20 Score on Public Services Awareness & Accessibility 6 Score on Awareness amongst people about their representative, their political party and ease of access to the representative Corruption Index 10 Score on perceived personal corruption of the representative Broad Measures 4 Score on overall satisfaction and improvement in quality of life 6
  • 7. 7
  • 8. Key Highlights of MLA RC 2012   2011 2012 Total Scores 1959.25 2034.84 Maximum Score 75.43 72.51 Minimum Score 47.01 53.73 Average Score 61.23 63.59 Spread 28.42 18.78 8
  • 9. Reasons for movement in ranks between years 2011 and 2012 MLA Name Party Rank 2012 Main Reason Rank 2011 Move Yogesh Amrutlal Sagar BJP 1 Questions Asked, People's Perception 4 3 Mangesh Sangle MNS 2 New Crimininal Record (FIR) 1 -1 Amin Amir Ali Patel INC 3 Attendance, People's Perception 10 7 Madhukar Balkrishna Chavan INC 4   7 3 Jagannath Achanna Shetty INC 5 Questions Asked 2 -3 Ramesh Singh Thakur INC 6 Questions Asked, Quality of Questions 12 6 Bala Dagdu Nandgaonkar MNS 7 Attendance 14 7 Subhash Rajaram Desai SS 8 People's Perception 6 -2 Kalidas Kolambkar INC 9 People's Perception 8 -1 Vinod Ghosalkar SS 10 Attendance 15 5 Milind Bhupal Kamble NCP 11   9 -2 Aslam Ramzan Ali Shaikh INC 12 Questions Asked, Quality of Questions 29 17 Rajhans Singh INC 13 People's Perception 25 12 Nawab Malik NCP 14 Questions Asked 5 -9 Sardar Tara Singh BJP 15 New Crimininal Record (Chargesheet) 3 -12 Mangal Prabhat Lodha BJP 16 Attendance 11 -5 Baldev  Basantsingh Khosa INC 17 Questions Asked, Quality of Questions 27 10 Krishnakumar Shripad Hegde INC 18   20 2 Shishir Shinde MNS 19 Questions Asked 31 12 Ravindra Dattaram Waikar SS 20   17 -3 Ramchandra Kadam MNS 21 Questions Asked 30 9 Ashok Bhau Jadhav INC 22 Questions Asked 13 -9 Annie  Sitambalam Shekhar INC 23 Quality of Question 21 -2 Pravin Darekar MNS 24   19 -5 Gopal Shetty BJP 25 Quality of Question 22 -3 Abu Asim Azmi SP 26 Attendance, Quality of Question 26 0 Prakash Sawant SS 27 Attendance, Questions Asked 16 -11 Kripashankar Singh INC 28   23 -5 Nitin Sardesai MNS 29 Questions Asked 18 -11 Sidikki Ziyauddin Abdul Rahim (Baba) INC 30 Attendance 28 -2 Prakash Manchhubhai Maheta BJP 31 People's Perception 32 1 Chandrakant Handore INC 32 Questions Asked, Attendance 24 -8
  • 10. Attend Question Quality Perceive Perceive Perceiv Crimin Rank Mo Score Mov ance s Asked of d d ed al ve eme Questio Perform Accessi Corrup Record me nt ns er bility tion nt MLA Name Scor es Ran Scores Ran Scores Ran Scores Ran Score Score Ran Score Ran (10) k (16) k (21) k (20) k s (6) Rank s (10) k s (5) k 2012 2011 2012 2011 Yogesh Sagar 8 20 12.38 8 12.67 13 12.85 21 2.95 24 8.05 6 5 1 1 4 3 72.51 71.16 1.35 Mangesh Sangle 8 20 15.47 2 12.44 19 13.51 13 3.90 9 7.95 7 0 16 2 1 -1 72.15 75.43 -3.28 Amin Patel 10 1 8.26 16 11.93 27 13.73 6 4.31 3 7.35 14 5 1 3 10 7 71.25 62.53 8.72 Madhukar Chavan 10 1 7.22 18 12.23 22 13.67 9 4.28 5 7.47 12 5 1 4 7 3 71.01 67.82 3.19 Jagannath Shetty 10 1 6.19 20 12.01 26 14.09 2 4.01 7 6.96 28 5 1 5 2 -3 69.00 71.46 -2.46 Ramesh Thakur 8 20 7.73 17 12.65 15 13.89 3 3.16 20 7.70 8 5 1 6 12 6 68.59 62.17 6.43 Bala Nandgaonkar 10 1 16.00 1 12.71 12 14.38 1 3.76 11 6.38 30 -7 29 7 14 7 66.98 61.96 5.02 Subhash Desai 10 1 14.96 3 12.98 4 12.34 26 3.44 18 7.25 20 -5 20 8 6 -2 66.53 68.33 -1.80 Kalidas Kolambkar 10 1 3.60 25 12.84 9 13.02 20 3.77 10 7.55 10 5 1 9 8 -1 66.47 65.88 0.59 Vinod Ghosalkar 10 1 13.92 5 12.77 10 13.13 17 3.56 17 7.35 14 -5 20 10 15 5 66.37 61.39 4.99 Milind Kamble 10 1 2.58 26 12.95 5 13.49 15 3.05 21 8.13 3 5 1 11 9 -2 65.23 64.46 0.77 Aslam Shaikh 10 1 9.79 13 12.99 3 12.25 27 3.63 16 7.49 11 -2 17 12 29 17 64.62 54.71 9.91 Rajhans Singh 8 20 4.13 23 11.75 29 13.26 16 2.44 30 9.10 1 5 1 13 25 12 64.23 56.63 7.60 Nawab Malik 10 1 2.58 26 12.95 5 13.11 18 2.85 25 7.12 23 5 1 14 5 -9 64.07 69.27 -5.20 Sardar Tara Singh 10 1 12.90 7 12.47 17 13.65 11 3.98 8 6.19 31 -5 20 15 3 -12 63.91 71.22 -7.30 10
  • 11. Attend Question Quality Perceive Perceive Perceiv Crimin Rank M Score Mo ance s Asked of d d ed al ov ve Questio Perform Accessi Corrup Record e me ns er bility tion m nt en t MLA Name Scor es Ran Scores Ran Scores Ran Scores Ran Score Score Ran Score Ran (10) k (16) k (21) k (20) k s (6) Rank s (10) k s (5) k 2012 2011 2012 2011 Mangal Prabhat Lodha 8 20 11.34 10 12.77 11 12.45 25 3.00 23 7.31 18 -2 17 16 11 -5 63.52 62.47 1.05 Baldev Khosa 8 20 1.54 29 12.04 24 12.71 22 5.13 1 8.05 4 5 1 17 27 10 63.20 55.13 8.07 Krishnakumar Hegde 10 1 4.13 23 12.92 7 10.90 32 2.05 32 7.38 13 5 1 18 20 2 62.59 59.03 3.56 Shishir Shinde 8 20 10.83 11 12.66 14 13.66 10 4.15 6 7.63 9 -5 20 19 31 12 62.51 52.18 10.33 Ravindra Waikar 10 1 14.45 4 12.87 8 11.62 30 2.81 27 7.04 24 -7 29 20 17 -3 62.35 60.58 1.77 Ramchandra Kadam 10 1 11.86 9 12.46 18 12.63 24 3.69 12 7.34 17 -7 29 21 30 9 62.10 52.97 9.13 Ashok Bhau Jadhav 10 1 5.66 21 11.78 28 13.73 6 4.31 3 7.35 14 -2 17 22 13 -9 61.50 62.07 -0.56 Annie Shekhar 8 20 1.02 30 13.33 1 13.56 12 3.35 19 7.24 21 5 1 23 21 -2 61.39 58.76 2.64 Pravin Darekar 8 20 13.41 6 12.51 16 12.71 22 5.13 1 8.05 4 -10 32 24 19 -5 60.54 59.33 1.21 Gopal Shetty 10 1 9.28 14 12.09 23 13.75 4 3.64 13 7.01 25 -5 20 25 22 -3 60.52 58.73 1.79 Abu Asim Azmi 10 1 6.70 19 13.23 2 13.75 4 3.64 13 7.01 25 -5 20 26 26 0 60.08 56.13 3.95 Prakash Sawant 6 30 10.32 12 12.40 20 13.70 8 2.52 29 8.33 2 -5 20 27 16 -11 59.16 60.61 -1.45 Kripashankar Singh 6 30 2.06 28 11.74 30 13.05 19 3.03 22 7.31 19 5 1 28 23 -5 58.93 58.09 0.84 Nitin Sardesai 10 1 8.77 15 12.27 21 11.62 31 2.15 31 6.98 27 -5 20 29 18 -11 57.36 59.59 -2.23 Ziyauddin Sidikki 10 1 0.51 31 10.45 32 12.02 28 2.83 26 5.86 32 5 1 30 28 -2 57.11 54.90 2.21 Prakash Maheta 8 20 5.15 22 12.01 25 13.50 14 3.63 15 7.19 22 -5 20 31 32 1 55.33 47.01 8.32 Chandrakant Handore 6 30 0.00 32 11.25 31 11.92 29 2.68 28 6.69 29 5 1 32 24 -8 53.73 57.27 -3.54 11
  • 12. MLA Name Total Question MLA Name Total Question Abu Asim Azmi 157 Mangesh Eknath Sangle 923 Amin Amir Ali Patel 296 Milind Bhupal Kamble 38 Annie  Sitambalam Shekhar 24 Nawab Malik 38 Ashok Bhau Jadhav 136 Nitin Vijaykumar Sardesai 337 Aslam Ramzan Ali Shaikh 422 Prakash Manchhubhai Maheta 117 Ziyauddin Abdul Rahim Sidikki  22 Prakash (Bala) Vasant Sawant 424 Baldev  Basantsingh Khosa 27 Pravin Yashwanr Darekar 681 Bala Dagdu Nandgaonkar 1165 Rajhans Dhananjay Singh 77 Chandrakant Handore 8 Ramchandra Shivaji Kadam 515 Gopal Chinaiya Shetty 392 Ramesh Singh Thakur 270 Jagannath Achanna Shetty 137 Ravindra Dattaram Waikar 750 Kalidas Nilkanth Kolambkar 74 Sardar Tara Singh 645 Kripashankar Singh 35 Shishir Krishnarao Shinde 455 Krishnakumar Shripad Hegde 77 Subhash Rajaram Desai 868 Mangal Prabhat Lodha 486 Vinod Ramchandra Ghosalkar 716 Madhukar Balkrishna Chavan 191 Yogesh Sagar 546 12 Total 11049
  • 13. Total Score Average Rank Average Score Political Party Name Inc. Inc. Inc. 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 (%) (%) (%) BJP (5) 311 316 1.67 14 18 22.22 62.12 63.16 1.67 INC (14) 846 894 5.57 18 16 -10.84 60.46 63.83 5.57 MNS (6) 361 382 5.59 19 17 -9.73 60.24 63.61 5.59 NCP (2) 134 129 -3.31 7 13 78.57 66.87 64.65 -3.31 SP (1) 56 60 7.04 26 26 0.00 56.13 60.08 7.04 SS (4) 251 254 1.40 14 16 20.37 62.72 63.60 1.40 13

Notas del editor

  1. !) The weightage for Perception of Public Services was further divided into a hierarchy of 4 levels to meet the desired objective. Level 1 included facilities which are more critical to state government whereas Level 4 included facilities that are more critical to central government. Level 1 – This level included areas like Power supply, Law & Order situation & Instances of crime. It was given a weightage of 8 points Level 2 – This level included areas like Availability of food through ration shops & Pollution problems. It was given a weightage of 5 points Level 3 – This level included areas like Hospitals & other Medical facilities & Appropriate Schools & Colleges. It was given a weightage of 4 points Level 4 – This level included rest of the areas like Condition of Roads, Traffic Jams & Congestion, Availability of public gardens, Availability of public transport facilities, Water Supply, Water logging problems & Cleanliness & Sanitation facilities. It was given a weightage of 3 points 2) Broad Overall Measures : included opinions on Satisfaction with the MLA and Improvement in Lifestyle.
  2. Individuals involved in developing this report card strongly believe that they cannot just wait and remain mute spectators when time is demanding action from them. All of them have come together to develop this report card with a over-arching belief in the Constitution of India and the opportunity it creates for improved and efficient governance – the mean towards achieving the high ideals of the constitution – Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. The Four Lion Torch The four lions of the Ashoka Pillar, symbolizing power, courage, pride and confidence are the ethos behind the Indian Republic as embedded in our Constitution. They have topped the list by on an objective ranking system as explained earlier in this report card, performing more efficiently relative to their peers.