Field Trips Motivate Student to Pursue Mathematics
Preparing Undergraduates to Work at the Intersection of Biology and Mathematics
1. Preparing Undergraduates to
Work at the Intersection of
Biology and Mathematics
Jason Miller, Ph.D. - Department of Mathematics
Timothy Walston, Ph.D. - Department of Biology
Truman State University
Available on http://www.slideshare.net/millerj870/ AAC&U 2012
7. About Truman
• Missouri’s only “highly selective” public
liberal arts University; pride in high-quality
teaching, small class size
AAC&U 2012
8. About Truman
• Missouri’s only “highly selective” public
liberal arts University; pride in high-quality
teaching, small class size
• ~6000 undergraduates, ~300 faculty, 150
Masters students
AAC&U 2012
9. About Truman
• Missouri’s only “highly selective” public
liberal arts University; pride in high-quality
teaching, small class size
• ~6000 undergraduates, ~300 faculty, 150
Masters students
• Institutional commitment to Undergraduate
Research and to Interdisciplinary teaching
AAC&U 2012
10. About Truman
• Missouri’s only “highly selective” public
liberal arts University; pride in high-quality
teaching, small class size
• ~6000 undergraduates, ~300 faculty, 150
Masters students
• Institutional commitment to Undergraduate
Research and to Interdisciplinary teaching
• EX: all students must take a Junior
Interdisciplinary Seminar
AAC&U 2012
12. About Truman
• about 25 biology faculty, 35 mathematics
faculty (math+stats+CS)
AAC&U 2012
13. About Truman
• about 25 biology faculty, 35 mathematics
faculty (math+stats+CS)
• biology: research expected of faculty (with
students); experienced mentors
AAC&U 2012
14. About Truman
• about 25 biology faculty, 35 mathematics
faculty (math+stats+CS)
• biology: research expected of faculty (with
students); experienced mentors
• mathematics: teaching focus, little or no
support for research activity; 10 new faculty
between 1998-2000
AAC&U 2012
15. Other Truman Factoids
• T&P research expectation varies between
departments
• Biology: medium
• Math & CS: low
• No formalized definition for faculty
workload beyond ‘credit load’ or ‘contact
hours’
AAC&U 2012
16. Photo by w4nd3rl0st (InspiredinDesMoines) - http://flic.kr/p/aPw9Xe
AAC&U 2012
17. pre-2003
Biology
Math
(Silos not to scale)
Photo by keeva999 - http://flic.kr/p/bXchED AAC&U 2012
30. R E P OR T T O T H E PR E SI DEN T
ENGAGE TO E XCEL: PRODUCI NG ONE M ILLION
A DDI T IONA L COLLEGE GR A DUAT ES W I T H
DEGR EES I N SCIENCE , T ECH NOLOGY,
ENGI NEER I NG, A N D M AT HEM AT ICS
Executive Office of the President
President’s Council of Advisors
on Science and Technology
F E BRUA RY 2 01 2
AAC&U 2012
33. Miller, Walston. Interdisciplinary Training in Mathematical
Biology Through Team-based Undergraduate Research and
Courses. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Fall;9(3):284-9.
AAC&U 2012
37. Mathematical Biology
Seminar (since 2003)
• Program fulcrum
• Biweekly meeting of faculty and
undergraduates
AAC&U 2012
38. Mathematical Biology
Seminar (since 2003)
• Program fulcrum
• Biweekly meeting of faculty and
undergraduates
• Initially, a “Biology Fashion Show”
AAC&U 2012
39. Mathematical Biology
Seminar (since 2003)
• Program fulcrum
• Biweekly meeting of faculty and
undergraduates
• Initially, a “Biology Fashion Show”
• Engineered several cross-disciplinary,
research hook-ups
AAC&U 2012
40. Mathematical Biology
Seminar (since 2003)
• Program fulcrum
• Biweekly meeting of faculty and
undergraduates
• Initially, a “Biology Fashion Show”
• Engineered several cross-disciplinary,
research hook-ups
• Pairings provided us with a foundation for
NSF UBM grant proposals
AAC&U 2012
51. • selection occurs in the Fall, students start
work in January (year-long)
AAC&U 2012
52. • selection occurs in the Fall, students start
work in January (year-long)
• weekly meetings during the academic year
AAC&U 2012
53. • selection occurs in the Fall, students start
work in January (year-long)
• weekly meetings during the academic year
• Intense 10-week summer research program
AAC&U 2012
75. UBM Accomplishments
• about 60 student participants
• 20+ faculty participants
• 80%+ students to graduate school
• 10%+ students to industry
• 20 papers in peer-reviewed scientific
journals
• scores of presentations at regional, national,
and international meetings
AAC&U 2012
76. UBM Accomplishments
From more than one ‘mathphobic’ biology
faculty member, research mentor:
“This program has changed the way
I think about doing research.”
AAC&U 2012
77. UBM Accomplishments
From more than one ‘mathphobic’ biology
faculty member, research mentor:
“This program has changed the way
I think about doing research.”
If it’s changing the way they think in the lab,
then it’s changing the way they talk with
students about mathematics
AAC&U 2012
78. “We are not trying to turn mathematics
majors into biology majors, nor are we
trying to turn biology majors into
mathematics majors.
Rather, we are trying to bring both together
at the intersection of the life and
mathematical sciences to train them to work
across disciplinary boundaries.”
AAC&U 2012
79. “We are not trying to turn mathematics
majors into biology majors, nor are we
trying to turn biology majors into
mathematics majors.
Rather, we are trying to bring both together
at the intersection of the life and
mathematical sciences to train them to work
across disciplinary boundaries.”
We work to bridge an epistemological gap
between the mathematical and life sciences.
AAC&U 2012
87. UBM Program
• a small group of faculty from math, CS, and
biology leveraged Truman strengths and
Hopper’s Law of Retroaction:
AAC&U 2012
88. UBM Program
• a small group of faculty from math, CS, and
biology leveraged Truman strengths and
Hopper’s Law of Retroaction:
“It is easier to seek forgiveness than
permission.”
AAC&U 2012
89. UBM Program
• a small group of faculty from math, CS, and
biology leveraged Truman strengths and
Hopper’s Law of Retroaction:
“It is easier to seek forgiveness than
permission.”
• NSF UBM grants in 2003, 2004, and 2009
AAC&U 2012
90. UBM Program
• a small group of faculty from math, CS, and
biology leveraged Truman strengths and
Hopper’s Law of Retroaction:
“It is easier to seek forgiveness than
permission.”
• NSF UBM grants in 2003, 2004, and 2009
• Established research-focused
interdisciplinary training program in mathbio.
AAC&U 2012
93. We Wanted More...
• impact a bigger group of students
• institutionalize the changes in culture,
activity
• courses
• Bioinformatics
• Introduction to Mathematical Biology
• Biostatistics/Biometry
• Introduction to Computational Science*
• (new, 2012) Calculus & Mathematical Methods for
the Life Sciences
AAC&U 2012
96. Data Competency-based
Minor
Modeling
Computational
Statistics
Interdisciplinary
Research
AAC&U 2012
97. Data Competency-based
Minor
Modeling
Computational
• Demonstrate proficiencies in each
category (though research,
courses)
Statistics
Interdisciplinary
Research
AAC&U 2012
98. Data Competency-based
Minor
Modeling
Computational
• Demonstrate proficiencies in each
category (though research,
courses)
Statistics • Earn 15+ credits doing so (must
take Intro to MathBio course)
Interdisciplinary
Research
AAC&U 2012
99. Data Competency-based
Minor
Modeling
Computational
• Demonstrate proficiencies in each
category (though research,
courses)
Statistics • Earn 15+ credits doing so (must
take Intro to MathBio course)
Interdisciplinary • Attend MathBio Seminar
Research
AAC&U 2012
100. Data Competency-based
Minor
Modeling
• competencies straddle disciplinary
boundaries
Computational
• create learning plan
• use experiences (incl. courses) to
Statistics show competencies
• faculty oversight committee
Interdisciplinary approves plan, notifies Registrar
Research when completed
AAC&U 2012
101. Other Courses
• Any that makes a connection between the
areas. Some example:
• Math Modeling • Developmental
• Ecology Biology
• ODEs • (Electron)
Microscopy
• Genetics of • Plant/Animal
Animal and Plant
Improvement Breeding
AAC&U 2012
112. ‘Convergent’ teamwork is going to be a defining
characteristic of 21st century science and
mathematics.
AAC&U 2012
113. ‘Convergent’ teamwork is going to be a defining
characteristic of 21st century science and
mathematics.
It can’t be taught through a series of lectures.
AAC&U 2012
114. ‘Convergent’ teamwork is going to be a defining
characteristic of 21st century science and
mathematics.
It can’t be taught through a series of lectures.
It can’t be taught from a textbook or by reading a
journal paper.
AAC&U 2012
115. ‘Convergent’ teamwork is going to be a defining
characteristic of 21st century science and
mathematics.
It can’t be taught through a series of lectures.
It can’t be taught from a textbook or by reading a
journal paper.
It can’t be taught in a course for a (single) major.
AAC&U 2012
116. ‘Convergent’ teamwork is going to be a defining
characteristic of 21st century science and
mathematics.
It can’t be taught through a series of lectures.
It can’t be taught from a textbook or by reading a
journal paper.
It can’t be taught in a course for a (single) major.
The above activities can motivate students and
prepare them to learn to be ‘convergent’
AAC&U 2012
118. ‘Convergence’ can be taught...
• Our experience provides strong evidence that
proper hands-on undergraduate research (or
research-like) projects can train undergraduates to
be ‘convergent’
AAC&U 2012
119. ‘Convergence’ can be taught...
• Our experience provides strong evidence that
proper hands-on undergraduate research (or
research-like) projects can train undergraduates to
be ‘convergent’
• Essential characteristics:
AAC&U 2012
120. ‘Convergence’ can be taught...
• Our experience provides strong evidence that
proper hands-on undergraduate research (or
research-like) projects can train undergraduates to
be ‘convergent’
• Essential characteristics:
• it’s a real research project to the mentors
AAC&U 2012
121. ‘Convergence’ can be taught...
• Our experience provides strong evidence that
proper hands-on undergraduate research (or
research-like) projects can train undergraduates to
be ‘convergent’
• Essential characteristics:
• it’s a real research project to the mentors
• mentors from different disciplines
AAC&U 2012
122. ‘Convergence’ can be taught...
• Our experience provides strong evidence that
proper hands-on undergraduate research (or
research-like) projects can train undergraduates to
be ‘convergent’
• Essential characteristics:
• it’s a real research project to the mentors
• mentors from different disciplines
• undergraduates from different disciplines
AAC&U 2012
123. ‘Convergence’ can be taught...
• Our experience provides strong evidence that
proper hands-on undergraduate research (or
research-like) projects can train undergraduates to
be ‘convergent’
• Essential characteristics:
• it’s a real research project to the mentors
• mentors from different disciplines
• undergraduates from different disciplines
• long-term immersion
AAC&U 2012
124. ‘Convergence’ can be taught...
• Our experience provides strong evidence that
proper hands-on undergraduate research (or
research-like) projects can train undergraduates to
be ‘convergent’
• Essential characteristics:
• it’s a real research project to the mentors
• mentors from different disciplines
• undergraduates from different disciplines
• long-term immersion
• students have sense of significant ownership
AAC&U 2012
129. Our program is costly
• research program:
• ≈$40k per team
• time and effort to recruit
• not easily sustainable
• minor: faculty time
• oversight
• recruiting, mentoring students
• courses
• departmental zero-sum, silo mentality
• team-teaching is seen as frivolous
AAC&U 2012
130. Funding Reality
1998 2015
From Tuition From State
How to sustain a program in this environment?
AAC&U 2012
131. Funding Reality
• Show program’s cost-benefit leans toward
‘benefit’ (e.g., credit generation, revenue)
• Show your program’s outcomes align with
University’s strategic plan
• Track student successes (e.g., subsequence
grades, post-graduation experiences) and
share
• Cultivate faculty buy-in (individual, group,
departmental, and school)
AAC&U 2012
132. Program Dashboard
• Applications to the summer research
program are low
• Enrollment in interdisciplinary courses and
minor is low-ish
• Our Intro to MathBio course was not team-
taught last semester
AAC&U 2012
135. Lessons Learned
• Starting a new interdepartmental program
requires guts and a theme that you (or
your team) can carry
• Sustaining a interdepartmental program
requires strong leadership and
administrative champion(s)
• Grant money opens a door, but membership
requires faculty buy-in
• This model for bringing disciplines together
could work for any pair of disciplines
AAC&U 2012
141. millerj@truman.edu
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF
UBM #0337769, #0436348, and #0926737. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or
recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
AAC&U 2012
Notas del editor
Thank the organizers (names)\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
END: an intersection of coincidences led a group of mathematical science faculty to reach out to biology faculty as a source of expertise in UR\n\nfeeding that interest: articles in professional society publications, Bio2010, and finally an NSF solicitation\n
END: an intersection of coincidences led a group of mathematical science faculty to reach out to biology faculty as a source of expertise in UR\n\nfeeding that interest: articles in professional society publications, Bio2010, and finally an NSF solicitation\n
END: an intersection of coincidences led a group of mathematical science faculty to reach out to biology faculty as a source of expertise in UR\n\nfeeding that interest: articles in professional society publications, Bio2010, and finally an NSF solicitation\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Spring of 2003\n\nI had been working with a colleague in Biology...\nBegan noticing calls going out in the professional societies...\n\nFloated the idea of a mathbio seminar...\n
Spring of 2003\n\nI had been working with a colleague in Biology...\nBegan noticing calls going out in the professional societies...\n\nFloated the idea of a mathbio seminar...\n
Spring of 2003\n\nI had been working with a colleague in Biology...\nBegan noticing calls going out in the professional societies...\n\nFloated the idea of a mathbio seminar...\n
Spring of 2003\n\nI had been working with a colleague in Biology...\nBegan noticing calls going out in the professional societies...\n\nFloated the idea of a mathbio seminar...\n
Spring of 2003\n\nI had been working with a colleague in Biology...\nBegan noticing calls going out in the professional societies...\n\nFloated the idea of a mathbio seminar...\n
Spring of 2003\n\nI had been working with a colleague in Biology...\nBegan noticing calls going out in the professional societies...\n\nFloated the idea of a mathbio seminar...\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Goal: to create infrastructure for a self-sustaining, research-based undergrad training program in mathematical biology\n+ elevate faculty scholarship \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Overlaps of interest and project needs get students working togeth informally and spontenously. coding, phylogenies, statistical tests, LaTeX or some other software environment, Matlab\n\nThe wide variety of faculty and research projects led us to adopt a program management strategy that was hands-off in many ways; we communicated the program goals and expectations repeatedly, to the community and the teams, but beyond that we did little to mandate how faculty managed their teams.\nWe knew that meeting frequently was important. We knew that communication would be challenging, so we encouraged them to maintain line of communication and put more effort into that than they might think nece\n\nstudents identify with the community; get to know many faculty members from both departments\n
Overlaps of interest and project needs get students working togeth informally and spontenously. coding, phylogenies, statistical tests, LaTeX or some other software environment, Matlab\n\nThe wide variety of faculty and research projects led us to adopt a program management strategy that was hands-off in many ways; we communicated the program goals and expectations repeatedly, to the community and the teams, but beyond that we did little to mandate how faculty managed their teams.\nWe knew that meeting frequently was important. We knew that communication would be challenging, so we encouraged them to maintain line of communication and put more effort into that than they might think nece\n\nstudents identify with the community; get to know many faculty members from both departments\n
Overlaps of interest and project needs get students working togeth informally and spontenously. coding, phylogenies, statistical tests, LaTeX or some other software environment, Matlab\n\nThe wide variety of faculty and research projects led us to adopt a program management strategy that was hands-off in many ways; we communicated the program goals and expectations repeatedly, to the community and the teams, but beyond that we did little to mandate how faculty managed their teams.\nWe knew that meeting frequently was important. We knew that communication would be challenging, so we encouraged them to maintain line of communication and put more effort into that than they might think nece\n\nstudents identify with the community; get to know many faculty members from both departments\n
Overlaps of interest and project needs get students working togeth informally and spontenously. coding, phylogenies, statistical tests, LaTeX or some other software environment, Matlab\n\nThe wide variety of faculty and research projects led us to adopt a program management strategy that was hands-off in many ways; we communicated the program goals and expectations repeatedly, to the community and the teams, but beyond that we did little to mandate how faculty managed their teams.\nWe knew that meeting frequently was important. We knew that communication would be challenging, so we encouraged them to maintain line of communication and put more effort into that than they might think nece\n\nstudents identify with the community; get to know many faculty members from both departments\n
Overlaps of interest and project needs get students working togeth informally and spontenously. coding, phylogenies, statistical tests, LaTeX or some other software environment, Matlab\n\nThe wide variety of faculty and research projects led us to adopt a program management strategy that was hands-off in many ways; we communicated the program goals and expectations repeatedly, to the community and the teams, but beyond that we did little to mandate how faculty managed their teams.\nWe knew that meeting frequently was important. We knew that communication would be challenging, so we encouraged them to maintain line of communication and put more effort into that than they might think nece\n\nstudents identify with the community; get to know many faculty members from both departments\n
Overlaps of interest and project needs get students working togeth informally and spontenously. coding, phylogenies, statistical tests, LaTeX or some other software environment, Matlab\n\nThe wide variety of faculty and research projects led us to adopt a program management strategy that was hands-off in many ways; we communicated the program goals and expectations repeatedly, to the community and the teams, but beyond that we did little to mandate how faculty managed their teams.\nWe knew that meeting frequently was important. We knew that communication would be challenging, so we encouraged them to maintain line of communication and put more effort into that than they might think nece\n\nstudents identify with the community; get to know many faculty members from both departments\n
Overlaps of interest and project needs get students working togeth informally and spontenously. coding, phylogenies, statistical tests, LaTeX or some other software environment, Matlab\n\nThe wide variety of faculty and research projects led us to adopt a program management strategy that was hands-off in many ways; we communicated the program goals and expectations repeatedly, to the community and the teams, but beyond that we did little to mandate how faculty managed their teams.\nWe knew that meeting frequently was important. We knew that communication would be challenging, so we encouraged them to maintain line of communication and put more effort into that than they might think nece\n\nstudents identify with the community; get to know many faculty members from both departments\n
Overlaps of interest and project needs get students working togeth informally and spontenously. coding, phylogenies, statistical tests, LaTeX or some other software environment, Matlab\n\nThe wide variety of faculty and research projects led us to adopt a program management strategy that was hands-off in many ways; we communicated the program goals and expectations repeatedly, to the community and the teams, but beyond that we did little to mandate how faculty managed their teams.\nWe knew that meeting frequently was important. We knew that communication would be challenging, so we encouraged them to maintain line of communication and put more effort into that than they might think nece\n\nstudents identify with the community; get to know many faculty members from both departments\n
Overlaps of interest and project needs get students working togeth informally and spontenously. coding, phylogenies, statistical tests, LaTeX or some other software environment, Matlab\n\nThe wide variety of faculty and research projects led us to adopt a program management strategy that was hands-off in many ways; we communicated the program goals and expectations repeatedly, to the community and the teams, but beyond that we did little to mandate how faculty managed their teams.\nWe knew that meeting frequently was important. We knew that communication would be challenging, so we encouraged them to maintain line of communication and put more effort into that than they might think nece\n\nstudents identify with the community; get to know many faculty members from both departments\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Through interdisciplinary experiences, bring mathematics majors to the point where they are capable of interacting with (collaborating with) professionals in the life sciences\n\nLikewise for biology majors.\n