This presentation includes the second Mobile Retail Barometer for Belgium. The objective of this study, made by Mobilosoft, is to analyze how good the Retailer's websites are when used on smartphones.
The results are not good at all: only 17% of the Belgian Retailer's websites offer an optimized layout for mobile navigation! But layout is not enough, loading speed should be improved... even on mobile optimized website!
Value Proposition canvas- Customer needs and pains
Belgian Mobile Barometer
1. Mobile Site Barometer 2013
Where are the top Belgian retail
companies in the Mobile Area?
2. Plan
• Study conducted by Mobilosoft
• How to satisfy your SoLoMo consumers
• Retail Mobile Barometer 2013
2
3. Study Conducted by Mobilosoft
• 354 websites of the top
Belgian retail companies
tested in March 2013 (Top
Trends)
• Comparison to the study
conducted in June 2012
• 31 sectors
Goal: Where are the top Belgian retail companies
in the mobile area and how are they performing
since last year?
3
4. Plan
• Study conducted by Mobilosoft
• How to satisfy your SoLoMo consumers
• Retail Mobile Barometer 2013
4
5. Appearing on smartphones is critical
In Belgium, more than 2 in 5 people own a
smartphone.
However, the situation is alarming:
Less than 20% of Belgian
retailers have a mobile website!
5
http://services.google.com/fh/files/blogs/our_mobile_planet_belgium_fr.pdf
6. It is time to satisfy your SoLoMo consumers!
So
• 71% visit Social Networks
Lo
• 79% use their smartphones to look for local
products or services
• 84% take action afterwards
Mo
• Smartphones are part of our daily lives
• The penetration rate is increasing
http://services.google.com/fh/files/blogs/our_mobile_planet_belgium_fr.pdf 6
7. If your mobile website can offer
consumers a satisfying web experience,
they will be more willing to
Return to your website
Visit your stores
Make purchases!
Increase traffic and conversion rates to your
physical stores
7
Nearly ¾ of mobile users say they are more likely to return
to mobile-friendly sites (Google Research).
GOOGLE RESEARCH, http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2208496/72-of-Consumers-Want-Mobile-Friendly-
Sites-Google-Research, Sep 2012
8. Plan
• Study conducted by Mobilosoft
• How to satisfy your SoLoMo consumers
• Retail Mobile Barometer 2013
8
9. In one year, the number of mobile websites grew only 7%!
Slow improvement for several sectors (i.e. Automotive,
Chocolate, Hotel & Catering and others)
9
17%
83%
2013
Mobile websites
Non-mobile websites
10%
90%
2012
Mobile websites
Non-mobile websites
10. When a site is not designed for mobile devices:
Not having a mobile website helps your
competitors
10
GOOGLE RESEARCH, http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2208496/72-of-Consumers-Want-Mobile-Friendly-
Sites-Google-Research, Sep 2012
48% of your potential consumers are annoyed
and frustrated. Moreover, 52% are less likely to do
business with you.
61% of mobile users turn to competitors to find what they
are looking for.
Your brand loses credibility and its reputation is damaged.
(i.e. through word of mouth)
11. Not all mobile websites are functional!
11
To access certain functionalities such as the catalogue or
the store locator, the mobile website links to pages that
cannot be viewed on mobile devices.
7% 6%
2013 2012
Non-functional
Functional
14. Catering and Hotels have adapted more effectively
14
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Fashion
Traditional retail
Cosmetics
DIY
Furniture
Sport center
Sports
Electronics
Petrol
Shoes
Services
Lingerie
Transport
Tyre
Chocolate
Kitchen
Travel
Handbags
Automotive
Nautical
Hotel
Restaurant
56%
17. Optimize your mobile website to suit different
behaviors
These critical functionalities should always be visible for
your consumers!
Consumers use their
smartphones to find
essential information
quickly and easily
Catalogue of
products /
services
Promotions
Price
Points of sale
17
18. 78%
27%
88%
42%
63%
Store locator Promotions Catalogue Social networks Link to the website
However, not all mobile websites provide these
essential functionalities for their consumers
Promotions and links to social networks are lagging behind.
18
21. 35.32
7.13
3.80 3.10
35.32
7.12
3.79 3.09
2G 3G 4G Wi-Fi
Average 2013
Average 2012
21
Improvement in average load times (in seconds)
Mobile site load times have shortened slightly. Yet, they are
still not fast enough!
22. 24.05
5.15
2.91 2.44
27.52
5.71
3.13 2.58
2G 3G 4G Wi-Fi
Mobile websites 2013
Mobile websites 2012
Mobile websites
22
37.58
7.53
3.98 3.23
36.18
7.27
3.86 3.14
2G 3G 4G Wi-Fi
Desktop websites 2013
Desktop websites 2012
Desktop websites
Improvement in average load times (in seconds)
23. But consumers are demanding
There is one thing mobile users will never overlook:
The load time of a web page!
23
Did you know?
EQUATION RESEARCH, What users want from mobile, Feb 2011
78% are willing to retry a website two times or less if it does not work initially.
50% are unlikely to return to a website that they had trouble accessing from
their mobile phone.
57% are unlikely to recommend the site.
71% of global mobile web users expect websites to load on their mobile
phone as quickly or faster than on the computer they use at home.
59% expect a website to load on their mobile phone in 3 seconds or less.
74% are willing to wait 5 seconds or less for a single web page to load
before leaving the site.
29. 28.28
19.69
30.00
28.09
21.00
28.86
Average Mobile websites Desktop websites
# Files 2013 # Files 2012
29
The number of files on mobile websites is
decreasing way too slowly
• Increase in the average number of files on desktop
websites
• Slight decrease in the average number of files on mobile
websites
Standard: 10 files
30. 14%
22%
20%
27%
17%
6%
24%
12%
26%
32%
Less than 5 5 to 10 10 to 15 15 to 30 More than 30
2013 2012
Mobile websites
30
8% 8%
12%
32%
40%
8%
10% 10%
35%
38%
Less than 5 5 to 10 10 to 15 15 to 30 More than 30
2013 2012
Desktop websites
Average number of files
32. 817.90
554.19
870.64
824.30
637.44
844.73
Average Mobile websites Desktop websites
Page Size 2013 Page Size 2012
32
Average page size (kB)
Standard: 87 kB
• Increase in the average page size on desktop websites
• Slight decrease in the average page size on mobile
websites
33. 10%
3% 3%
8% 10%
15%
49%
12%
3% 3%
6% 6%
15%
56%
0 to 50 kb 50 to 75 kb 75 to 100 kb 100 to 125 kb 125 to 200 kb 200 to 300kb More than 300 kb
2013 2012
Mobile websites
33
7%
1% 2% 3%
7% 8%
73%
7%
2% 3% 3% 5%
11%
69%
0 to 50 kb 50 to 75 kb 75 to 100 kb 100 to 125 kb 125 to 200 kb 200 to 300kb More than 300 kb
2013 2012
Desktop websites
Average page size
40. A mobile site that features
what your customers really
need:
Your stores
Your promotions
Your catalogue
Links to your social networks
We manage your mobile website
Test it:
http://m.carrefour.eu/
41. We make sure your local promotions are
well referenced
On Foursquare, your mobile website and
Google
42. And tomorrow, we’ll even personalize the
content of your mobile sites
42
…
form into
Mobilosoft site
Intelligent
Scenario
Get a
personalized
offer per sms
See & use
personalized
offer on mobile
site
Intelligent
Scenario: new
coupons, forms,
…
43. All of this is done via a single tool
Centralize the data
management
And synchronize
across all platforms
44. Today, we manage the virtual presence of
more than 7000 point of sales in 14 countries
Editor's Notes
Retrouvez les donnéesdansl’Excel qui se trouvesur ladropbox: dossier “3.Marketing” => dossier “12.Studies” => dossier “3.Baromètre mobile” => dossier “Retail Mobile Barometer 2013” => Fichier Excel “Retail Mobile Barometer_Top354_2013” => dernière page.
http://www.journaldunet.com/ebusiness/internet-mobile/site-mobile/Selonuneétuderéalisée par GroupM pour SFR, les applications ne constituent pas la plus grosseported'entréeàl'Internet mobile aux yeux des mobinautes. Le portail de l'opérateur, l'utilisation d'un moteur de rechercheou la saisiedirected'une URL dans un navigateur mobile sont plus souventcités par les possesseurs de smartphones comme des façonsd'accéderàl'Internet mobile
http://www.journaldunet.com/ebusiness/internet-mobile/site-mobile/Selonuneétuderéalisée par GroupM pour SFR, les applications ne constituent pas la plus grosseported'entréeàl'Internet mobile aux yeux des mobinautes. Le portail de l'opérateur, l'utilisation d'un moteur de rechercheou la saisiedirected'une URL dans un navigateur mobile sont plus souventcités par les possesseurs de smartphones comme des façonsd'accéderàl'Internet mobile
http://www.journaldunet.com/ebusiness/internet-mobile/site-mobile/Selonuneétuderéalisée par GroupM pour SFR, les applications ne constituent pas la plus grosseported'entréeàl'Internet mobile aux yeux des mobinautes. Le portail de l'opérateur, l'utilisation d'un moteur de rechercheou la saisiedirected'une URL dans un navigateur mobile sont plus souventcités par les possesseurs de smartphones comme des façonsd'accéderàl'Internet mobile
Mobile Site: Diminution générale entre 10-25sec et entre 50 secet > 75 sec en 2013.Cette diminution estcompensée par unelégère augmentation au niveau de la tranche “25-50sec” (Négatif car temps de chargement encore élevé!) et par une augmentation relativementimportante au niveau de la tranche “5-10sec” => Positif! Mais attention, diminution également de la tranche “< 5 sec.Desktop Site: Evolution variable. Maisprincipale augmentation constatéedans la tranche “25-50 sec” et tranche “50-75 sec”.
Mobile Site: Diminution généraleou stagnation àpartir de 3sec,ce qui a engendréune forte augmentation du pourcentagedans la tranche “Less than 3 sec”. La majorité des sites mobiles se retrouvemtn avec des temps de loading “bon” => POSITIFDesktop Site: Augmentation des tranches “10-15sec” et “ More than 15sec” + et diminution dans les tranches jusqu’à 10sec.
Mobile Site: Forte diminution dans la tranche “2-3sec” + légère diminution àpd 5sec, cequi a engendréune forte augmentation du pourcentagedans la tranche “Less than 2 sec”. Certains sites qui avaient des temps de loading “acceptable” sontmaintenant “bon” => POSITIFDesktop Site: Diminution générale, saufdans la tranche “5-10sec” qui augmente. Des temps de loading “bon” de certains sites sontmaintenantlents! => NEGATIF
Mobile Site: Diminution généraleàpartir de 3sec,ce qui a engendréune augmentation du pourcentagedans la tranche “Less than 2 sec” & “2-3sec”, ce qui est bon comme temps de loading => POSITIFDesktop Site: Augmentation dans la tranche “3-5sec” et diminution dans les autres tranches. La majoritéestpassée de Bon àAcceptabe => NEGATIF
Mobile Site: Diminution généraleàpartir de 3sec,ce qui a engendréune augmentation du pourcentagedans la tranche “Less than 2 sec” & “2-3sec”, ce qui est bon comme temps de loading => POSITIFDesktop Site: Augmentation dans la tranche “3-5sec” et diminution dans les autres tranches. La majoritéestpassée de Bon àAcceptabe => NEGATIF
Site mobile: Diminution du pourcentage de sites ayant plus de 15 fichiersDesktop site: Augmentation du pourcentage de sites ayant plus de 30 fichiers
Site mobile: Evolution variable. Desktop site: Augmentation du pourcentage de sites dont la taille est supérieure à 300kb.