1. Nature vs international anarchy
America found itself after the cold war, just like an element in ecosystem, which lost one of its
necessary compounds, bringing each pattern is threatened with disappearing.
On the one hand the Geopolitical and geoeconomic transformation after the Cold War led to
prospective endangered chaos, and on the other hand the mechanisms of rational realist security
strategy of America and its allies led them to devote this Chaos to a corrupted end.
And through the procedures of the new international order the world as a whole became in danger
because of these two elements.
We are in a conflicting situation between two models each wants to impose itself as an alternative to
regulate human life through a strategic management of international interactions
The first form is the real positive of US foreign policy and its appliers in the world
And the second model is not the product of human rationality, but it is from the nature which
exposes their alternative mechanisms today, through organizational security dilemma exhibition, by
the emergence of a dominant force, for the first time in history.
And the theater of this conflict are geopolitical ,economic and theoretical transformations,
addressed from America and its allies which tries to push or hinder the strong natural
transformations that want to refer international community to the natural condition, and this
struggle appear now in the organizational chaos appeared within the form of international
relations.
And focusing more on the core of the conflict, we find that values are strategic objective of
belligerents:
- The new international system and globalization wants through mechanisms of transforming
the human being into a machine consumers and Communities to markets, according to the
status of the background of rational positivist’s mechanism, where the personalized
sociological specificities of Nations will be melted.
- Nature, want to force the opposite in devoting Privacy for International actors, and build
relationships in accordance with the logic of the international community and global
governance, founded on efficient and respected participation of actors and the whole of
international units, leading to global integration.
It is conflict between nature and logic automation, nature wants freedom and dignity for all,
either the mechanism is stereotyping the life of majority according to the method which held
the goals controlled by the dominant actors over the majority.
2. The means of this conflict are strategic security schemes at the international level.
And therefore we will try to demonstrate the assumption that the United States found itself
as global dominant after the Cold War realized itself in organizational security dilemma, and
it does not knew its destination, and try to face this situation with mechanisms which led to
Cede domination's profit, and though relatively, in following strategy:
United States security strategy centered on:
• fit the capitalist world.
• National domestic stability: and both are by creating external threat.
• Standardization of third world in accordance with the mechanisms of the market economy
and globalization.
• "Deterrence – reassurance" towards the ambitious regional States, in twofold objective:
devoting a sense of external threat through the work of the United States to create a new
rival Tycoon includes such States, in accordance with the agreement to split the international
geopolitical interests, and at the same time, America rest over geopolitical regulatory
dilemma of international security, which occurred after the collapse of the Soviet Union,
such becoming the international force configuration interactions uncontrolled, with
unknown destination.
And this strategy has implications for the formation of an international community security,
most serious fallout than cold war because:
- Cold-war polarization effect on International actors Privacy but under national titles which
relatively respected cultural specificities, but now there is no ideological polarization, but
starting to show new security impact of polarity within the Syrian crisis, centered on China
,Russia and Shiite Crescent.
And this alliance is not ideological, but it is the alliance of the last resisters against
democratic alteration, and matched by what appears on it "free world" or "democratic"
,which aims to achieve a new world order in the rest of the world.
- And the aim of his dictates pole rival is to keep his authoritarian units systems, with regional
and national ambitions, which don't want to cede "its kingdoms" for Western strategy.
This fact naturally leads to disrupt the normal development of political communities of the
Alliance, because it will deprive him from Mechanisms of differentiation, integration and
transition as axioms of development, because of tyranny.
And on the other hand would be political communities of the free world to process
automated profiling in the context of the new international order of globalization and market
economy.
3. This was the main aspects of the current world politics race, which is not between nations or
cultures or ideologies, or even economic interests, but it’s a hidden conflict between natural
sociopolitical rules versus realist, rational, positivist false conceived assumptions.
To be continued.
Next: Syrian crisis, within Nature / International anarchy clash.
By: mouloud hayoun/ Algerian sociopolitical thinker.
hayounmouloud@gmail.com
mouloudmohammed hayoun@facebook.com
mouloudmhayoun@tweeter.com
mouloud hayoun@linkedIn