SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
Download to read offline
Redistricting 101 presented by Mike Dean, Common Cause Minnesota
Tonight’s conversation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
What is redistricting? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
What is redistricting?
Tonight’s conversation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
When does redistricting happen? April 1, 2010 ― December 31, 2010 ― January 10, 2011 ― April 1, 2011 ― May 23, 2011  --- February 21, 2012   ―  April 2, 2012  ―   November 6 2012  ― Minnesota congressional and legislative lines drawn Census count to President Apportionment to U.S. House Redistricting data to states Census Day Precincts and city wards Election Day. End of legislative session
Tonight’s conversation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Why does redistricting matter? should
Why does redistricting matter? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Barack Obama’s house
Why does redistricting matter?
Tonight’s conversation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Who draws the lines?
Tonight’s conversation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Senate Assembly Not nested Nested Nesting
[object Object],Compactness
[object Object],Contiguity
[object Object],[object Object],Political Boundaries
Cracking Packing Minority Representation
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Communities of Interest
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Partisanship and competition
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],2000 2002 Remember: Competition can take different forms Barack Obama’s house
Current Criteria in Minnesota ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Tonight’s conversation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
www.drawminneapolis.org Thank you!

More Related Content

What's hot

New Media: Political participation presentation
New Media: Political participation presentation New Media: Political participation presentation
New Media: Political participation presentation Albert Cherry
 
Elections, voting, and voter behavior
Elections, voting, and voter behaviorElections, voting, and voter behavior
Elections, voting, and voter behaviorDan Hess
 
How Democratic is the UK?
How Democratic is the UK?How Democratic is the UK?
How Democratic is the UK?mattbentley34
 
ap gov chap 11
ap gov chap 11ap gov chap 11
ap gov chap 11m15tuhw15e
 
The Media
The MediaThe Media
The Mediarcambou
 
Lawrence Lessig's "The Problem with Money in Politics" at UCLA on November 17...
Lawrence Lessig's "The Problem with Money in Politics" at UCLA on November 17...Lawrence Lessig's "The Problem with Money in Politics" at UCLA on November 17...
Lawrence Lessig's "The Problem with Money in Politics" at UCLA on November 17...Rootstrikers
 
How democratic is the UK?
How democratic is the UK? How democratic is the UK?
How democratic is the UK? mattbentley34
 
(Week 4) political participation
(Week 4) political participation(Week 4) political participation
(Week 4) political participationwtidwell
 
ap gov chap 15
ap gov chap 15ap gov chap 15
ap gov chap 15m15tuhw15e
 
Unit 1 - All you need to Know
Unit 1 - All you need to KnowUnit 1 - All you need to Know
Unit 1 - All you need to Knowmattbentley34
 
Political Participation
Political ParticipationPolitical Participation
Political ParticipationChris Thomas
 
Florida Ammendment 4
Florida Ammendment 4Florida Ammendment 4
Florida Ammendment 4kbeckpsm
 
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional DesignConstitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional Designatrantham
 

What's hot (18)

Chapt 4
Chapt 4Chapt 4
Chapt 4
 
New Media: Political participation presentation
New Media: Political participation presentation New Media: Political participation presentation
New Media: Political participation presentation
 
Elections
ElectionsElections
Elections
 
Elections
ElectionsElections
Elections
 
Elections, voting, and voter behavior
Elections, voting, and voter behaviorElections, voting, and voter behavior
Elections, voting, and voter behavior
 
How Democratic is the UK?
How Democratic is the UK?How Democratic is the UK?
How Democratic is the UK?
 
ap gov chap 11
ap gov chap 11ap gov chap 11
ap gov chap 11
 
The Media
The MediaThe Media
The Media
 
Lawrence Lessig's "The Problem with Money in Politics" at UCLA on November 17...
Lawrence Lessig's "The Problem with Money in Politics" at UCLA on November 17...Lawrence Lessig's "The Problem with Money in Politics" at UCLA on November 17...
Lawrence Lessig's "The Problem with Money in Politics" at UCLA on November 17...
 
How democratic is the UK?
How democratic is the UK? How democratic is the UK?
How democratic is the UK?
 
(Week 4) political participation
(Week 4) political participation(Week 4) political participation
(Week 4) political participation
 
ap gov chap 4
ap gov chap 4ap gov chap 4
ap gov chap 4
 
ap gov chap 15
ap gov chap 15ap gov chap 15
ap gov chap 15
 
Unit 1 - All you need to Know
Unit 1 - All you need to KnowUnit 1 - All you need to Know
Unit 1 - All you need to Know
 
Political Participation
Political ParticipationPolitical Participation
Political Participation
 
Florida Ammendment 4
Florida Ammendment 4Florida Ammendment 4
Florida Ammendment 4
 
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional DesignConstitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
 
Chapter8
Chapter8Chapter8
Chapter8
 

Similar to Final what's at stake minneapolis

Congressional Campaigns and Elections
Congressional Campaigns and ElectionsCongressional Campaigns and Elections
Congressional Campaigns and Electionsatrantham
 
Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation
 Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation
Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results PresentationCause Empowerment
 
MP2 Review for VA and US Government
MP2 Review for VA and US GovernmentMP2 Review for VA and US Government
MP2 Review for VA and US Governmentadutcher
 
Politics For Amateurs Revised
Politics For Amateurs RevisedPolitics For Amateurs Revised
Politics For Amateurs Revisedleolds
 
The teachings of the all knowing ones
The teachings of the all knowing onesThe teachings of the all knowing ones
The teachings of the all knowing onesBrad Klitzke
 
Legislative Branch: 3rd Set of Notes
Legislative Branch:  3rd Set of NotesLegislative Branch:  3rd Set of Notes
Legislative Branch: 3rd Set of Notesadutcher
 
Research Paper-Guzy 1
Research Paper-Guzy 1Research Paper-Guzy 1
Research Paper-Guzy 1Michael Guzy
 
Honors Project Final Draft
Honors Project Final DraftHonors Project Final Draft
Honors Project Final DraftAndrew Wyatt
 
Arlynnell Dickson CAPC Final Presentation Spring 2015
Arlynnell Dickson CAPC Final Presentation Spring 2015Arlynnell Dickson CAPC Final Presentation Spring 2015
Arlynnell Dickson CAPC Final Presentation Spring 2015Arlynnell Dickson
 
AG Chapter 6 Section 4
AG Chapter 6 Section 4AG Chapter 6 Section 4
AG Chapter 6 Section 4Barry Wiseman
 
American Government - Chapter 9 - Parties and Campaigns
American Government - Chapter 9 - Parties and CampaignsAmerican Government - Chapter 9 - Parties and Campaigns
American Government - Chapter 9 - Parties and Campaignscyruskarimian
 
AP_Unit2
AP_Unit2AP_Unit2
AP_Unit2rcambou
 
Policy and Elections 3.03 LC)The president is responsible for se.docx
Policy and Elections 3.03 LC)The president is responsible for se.docxPolicy and Elections 3.03 LC)The president is responsible for se.docx
Policy and Elections 3.03 LC)The president is responsible for se.docxIRESH3
 

Similar to Final what's at stake minneapolis (20)

Congressional Campaigns and Elections
Congressional Campaigns and ElectionsCongressional Campaigns and Elections
Congressional Campaigns and Elections
 
Lobbying101 for foc december 2015
Lobbying101 for foc december 2015Lobbying101 for foc december 2015
Lobbying101 for foc december 2015
 
Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation
 Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation
Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation
 
No labels movement
No labels movementNo labels movement
No labels movement
 
MP2 Review for VA and US Government
MP2 Review for VA and US GovernmentMP2 Review for VA and US Government
MP2 Review for VA and US Government
 
Politics For Amateurs Revised
Politics For Amateurs RevisedPolitics For Amateurs Revised
Politics For Amateurs Revised
 
The teachings of the all knowing ones
The teachings of the all knowing onesThe teachings of the all knowing ones
The teachings of the all knowing ones
 
Redistricting, Reapportionment and Reform
Redistricting, Reapportionment and ReformRedistricting, Reapportionment and Reform
Redistricting, Reapportionment and Reform
 
Peter Wluka and Megan Amundson BWH Boston 2011
Peter Wluka and Megan Amundson BWH Boston 2011Peter Wluka and Megan Amundson BWH Boston 2011
Peter Wluka and Megan Amundson BWH Boston 2011
 
Legislative Branch: 3rd Set of Notes
Legislative Branch:  3rd Set of NotesLegislative Branch:  3rd Set of Notes
Legislative Branch: 3rd Set of Notes
 
Elections
ElectionsElections
Elections
 
Research Paper-Guzy 1
Research Paper-Guzy 1Research Paper-Guzy 1
Research Paper-Guzy 1
 
Honors Project Final Draft
Honors Project Final DraftHonors Project Final Draft
Honors Project Final Draft
 
Arlynnell Dickson CAPC Final Presentation Spring 2015
Arlynnell Dickson CAPC Final Presentation Spring 2015Arlynnell Dickson CAPC Final Presentation Spring 2015
Arlynnell Dickson CAPC Final Presentation Spring 2015
 
AG Chapter 6 Section 4
AG Chapter 6 Section 4AG Chapter 6 Section 4
AG Chapter 6 Section 4
 
American Government - Chapter 9 - Parties and Campaigns
American Government - Chapter 9 - Parties and CampaignsAmerican Government - Chapter 9 - Parties and Campaigns
American Government - Chapter 9 - Parties and Campaigns
 
AP_Unit2
AP_Unit2AP_Unit2
AP_Unit2
 
Uk Election Process
Uk Election ProcessUk Election Process
Uk Election Process
 
Unit 2
Unit 2Unit 2
Unit 2
 
Policy and Elections 3.03 LC)The president is responsible for se.docx
Policy and Elections 3.03 LC)The president is responsible for se.docxPolicy and Elections 3.03 LC)The president is responsible for se.docx
Policy and Elections 3.03 LC)The president is responsible for se.docx
 

More from mpdean1

Election protection training
Election protection trainingElection protection training
Election protection trainingmpdean1
 
Alumni As Advocates
Alumni As AdvocatesAlumni As Advocates
Alumni As Advocatesmpdean1
 
Social Media Primer
Social Media PrimerSocial Media Primer
Social Media Primermpdean1
 
E-Advocacy 2.0
E-Advocacy 2.0E-Advocacy 2.0
E-Advocacy 2.0mpdean1
 
Using Web 2.0 to Build Stronger Government Relations and Advocacy Programs
Using Web 2.0 to Build Stronger Government Relations and Advocacy ProgramsUsing Web 2.0 to Build Stronger Government Relations and Advocacy Programs
Using Web 2.0 to Build Stronger Government Relations and Advocacy Programsmpdean1
 
Building a Successful Advocacy Program - Case Studies from Around the Country
Building a Successful Advocacy Program - Case Studies from Around the CountryBuilding a Successful Advocacy Program - Case Studies from Around the Country
Building a Successful Advocacy Program - Case Studies from Around the Countrympdean1
 
Leveraging Technology for Successful Advocacy in Higher Education
Leveraging Technology for Successful Advocacy in Higher EducationLeveraging Technology for Successful Advocacy in Higher Education
Leveraging Technology for Successful Advocacy in Higher Educationmpdean1
 
5 Ways Every Non-profit Should Use the Internet
5 Ways Every Non-profit Should Use the Internet  5 Ways Every Non-profit Should Use the Internet
5 Ways Every Non-profit Should Use the Internet mpdean1
 

More from mpdean1 (8)

Election protection training
Election protection trainingElection protection training
Election protection training
 
Alumni As Advocates
Alumni As AdvocatesAlumni As Advocates
Alumni As Advocates
 
Social Media Primer
Social Media PrimerSocial Media Primer
Social Media Primer
 
E-Advocacy 2.0
E-Advocacy 2.0E-Advocacy 2.0
E-Advocacy 2.0
 
Using Web 2.0 to Build Stronger Government Relations and Advocacy Programs
Using Web 2.0 to Build Stronger Government Relations and Advocacy ProgramsUsing Web 2.0 to Build Stronger Government Relations and Advocacy Programs
Using Web 2.0 to Build Stronger Government Relations and Advocacy Programs
 
Building a Successful Advocacy Program - Case Studies from Around the Country
Building a Successful Advocacy Program - Case Studies from Around the CountryBuilding a Successful Advocacy Program - Case Studies from Around the Country
Building a Successful Advocacy Program - Case Studies from Around the Country
 
Leveraging Technology for Successful Advocacy in Higher Education
Leveraging Technology for Successful Advocacy in Higher EducationLeveraging Technology for Successful Advocacy in Higher Education
Leveraging Technology for Successful Advocacy in Higher Education
 
5 Ways Every Non-profit Should Use the Internet
5 Ways Every Non-profit Should Use the Internet  5 Ways Every Non-profit Should Use the Internet
5 Ways Every Non-profit Should Use the Internet
 

Recently uploaded

One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfSABC News
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinIpsos France
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 

Recently uploaded (9)

One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 

Final what's at stake minneapolis

Editor's Notes

  1. Thank you to the Brennan Center for Justice for the structure and much of the content for in these presentation.
  2. Why redistricting matters.
  3. Every ten years, Minneapolis redraws political boundaries for the wards and park board to account for population shifts throughout the state. This process, known as redistricting, is about grouping different sets of voters together to create a new political community. How those groups get organized can have a profound impact on who wins the next election and ultimately determines the composition of the city hall. Redistricting is too often ignored because the process is technical. However, too much is at stake to leave this important process to special interests and legislators. One person – one vote
  4. February 21, 2012 ---- Legislative and congressional districts (25 weeks before the state primary) May 1, 2012 ----- Precincts and city wards (19 weeks before the state primary) May 6, 2012 ------ Candidates establish residency in districts (6 months before Election Day) May 29, 2012 County commissioner, school, park, hospital, soil & water conservation districts (15 weeks before the state primary) July 16, 2012 Candidate filing deadline September 11, 2012 State Primary November 6, 2012 Election Day
  5. The polarization that plagues the federal government and now state government is a cry for citizens to become more engaged in how government functions. One only needs to look to Wisconsin and Illinois, where the political parties gerrymandered the maps to create safe seats to maximize their advantage in the next election. It is those safe seats that are partly to blame for the polarization that plagues our political discourse.   Thanks to the courts, which have drawn the political maps in our state for a number of cycles, Minnesota has not seen the rampant gerrymandering that has existed in those other Midwestern states. However, the court can take additional steps to fully maximize the number of competitive districts. Before the court undertakes this process, however, Minnesotans should have a fuller conversation about what principles we value in the redistricting process, and thus our democracy
  6. Eliminating incumbents or challengers In the 2000 democratic primary, Senator Barack Obama won more than 30% of the vote against incumbent Bobby Rush. Though he lost, his strong showing set the stage for a real duel in a potential rematch. In the meantime, Illinois redrew its congressional districts, in a process controlled by sitting legislators. The process neatly carved Obama out of the district, with the new lines running one block north, two blocks to the west, and one block south of Obama’s home. With Obama out of the picture, no candidate ran against Rush in the primary in either 2002 or 2004. Diluting minority votes TravisCountyDistricts.png U.S. congressional districts covering en:Travis County, Texas (outlined in red) in 2002, left, and 2004. In 2003, Republicans in the Texas legislature redistricted the state, diluting the voting power of the heavily Democratic county by parceling its residents out to more Republican districts. Created by me using Microsoft MapPoint 2004 and data from http://nationalatlas.gov The district in orange is the infamous "Fajita strip" district 25 (intended as a Democratic district), while the other two districts (10 and 21) are intended to elect Republicans. District 25 has now been redrawn as a result of the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision, and is no longer a "Fajita strip". A 2003 congressional redistricting plan, drawn up in Texas under the helm of then U.S. House Majority leader Tom DeLay, moved about 100,000 Latino voters from one district to an adjacent one, in order to protect a particular incumbent. The incumbent had lost support among latinos every election since 1996, and just before lines were redrawn, Latinos had grown to a majority of the voting-age population in the district. The lines split off a sizable portion of the latino community and replaced them with voters more inclined to favor the incumbent. The plan ended up in the Supreme Court later forced Texas to redraw the district.
  7. Comparison of U.S. House election results for Texas in 2002 and 2004 after mid-term redistricting. the Republican- controlled Texas legislature ‘moved’ 100,000 citizens from the majority Latino Congressional District 23 to Congressional District 25 in order to protect a District 23 incumbent who was out of favor with Latinos.  the legislature added residents from predominantly white Republican counties to District 23, which dropped the Latino share of the citizen voting- age population from 57.5% to 46%.  To complete the jigsaw puzzle of redistricting, the legislature created an expanded District 25 that ran three hundred miles down the state. Latinos comprised 55% of this new District’s citizen voting-age population, but the two primary Latino communities were divided between the far north and the far south of the district. In League of United Latin American Citizens et al v. Perry, Governor of Texas, et al , the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that ‘Texas’ redrawing of District 23’s lines amount[ed] to vote dilution violative of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.’ The District 23 incumbent, Republican Henry Bonilla, lost the next race in 2006 to Democrat Ciro Rodriguez. Though the GOP’s gerrymandering attempt was struck down by the Court, it demonstrates how race and politics factor into the redistricting process and provides a cautionary tale for parties and state legislatures seeking to engineer such districts in the next round of redistricting.”
  8. Nesting is the delimitation of voting districts for one elected body in order to define the voting districts for another body. If the Assembly districts and the Senate districts are created independently of each other, then the process of nesting is not used. The major concerns of nesting are: the practice may impede the creation of majority-minority districts the practice may cause cities or other communities with common concerns to be split into different voting districts (and therefore dilute their votes) Illinois – Y Indiana – Y Iowa – Y Kansas – Michigan – Minnesota – Y Missouri – Nebraska – Ohio – Y Oklahoma – Wisconsin – Y
  9. Florida Congressional District 3, 1992 (see Citizen’s Guide to Redistricting, page 50). Compactness is often measured based upon comparison of the districts’ area compared to the districts’ perimeter or as compared to the area of a circle with the same perimeter. Or by its dispersion – where a district has more pieces reaching out from the center. Illinois – Y Indiana – N Iowa – Y Kansas – Y Michigan – Y Minnesota – Y Missouri – Y Nebraska – Y Ohio – Y Oklahoma – Y (for the senate) Wisconsin – Y
  10. Contiguity requires that all parts of a district are adjacent to each other. The shape of the left is non-contiguous while the one on the right is fully connected and therefore, contiguous. All midwest states require contiguity for their districts where practicable. Most states make exceptions for waterways and islands.
  11. The criteria to follow political boundaries can result in odd configurations the following blue area represents the City of Columbus in Ohio and the white line is Franklin County. You can see how a requirement to follow one political boundary can exclude voters based upon a different political boundary. Illinois – none (does not apply to Congressional) Indiana – none (does not apply to Congressional) Iowa – all (applies to Congressional) Kansas – all (applies to Congressional) Michigan – counties (applies to Congressional) Minnesota – county, city, town (applies to Congressional) Missouri – county (does not apply to Congressional) Nebraska – county (applies to Congressional) Ohio – county, township, municipality, city ward (does not apply to Congressional) Oklahoma – county (does not apply to Congressional) Wisconsin – ward (does not apply to Congressional)
  12. Another important consideration under federal law are the constraints on line drawers related to minority representation under the Voting Rights Act. To illustrate – its easiest to imagine a jurisdiction with no districts. In this example there are clear and tan people in this imaginary district. There are 20 “clear” people and 16 “tan” people. Under and at-large election system, if all the tan people and clear people experience no cross-over voting (that is to say they will vote for different candidates) then the tan population will never be able to elect a candidate of choice. To remedy that situation an alternative is to create “districts” for purposes of electing representatives. This can give rise to potential problems for the tan voters. If the lines are drawn in such a way to subdivide the tan voters so they can never make up a majority of any of the districts, that is called “cracking.” In the alternative, where all the tan voters are drawn into one or two districts so to minimize their influence in a large number of districts that is called “packing.” In both cases cracking or packing minority voters can result in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
  13. Communities of Interest is an important factor, that can define how most of us think about our community. COI as a redistricting principle is expressly recognized by law in: Illinois – Indiana – Iowa – Kansas Y Michigan – counties (applies to Congressional) Minnesota – Y Missouri – Y Nebraska – Ohio – Oklahoma – Y (for the senate) Wisconsin – Y When considering a community of interest factors may include, among others, economic factors, social factors, cultural factors, geographic features, governmental jurisdictions and service delivery areas, political beliefs, voting trends, and incumbency considerations One of the dangers of applying the “community of interest” factor is that it can be perceived as a proxy for race – which, if it predominates, is unconstitutional. Where a redistricting authority relies upon community of interest in establishing district lines it must be able to show (1) a tangible common thread of interest that extends beyond race and that the redistricting authority was aware of the community at the time the plan was formed.
  14. Illinois Indiana Iowa – person or party Kansas Michigan Minnesota Missouri Nebraska – person or party Ohio Oklahoma Wisconsin
  15. When people refer to Competitive Districts – they do not always mean the same thing. Sometimes people are seeking to avoid politician choosing their voters so that they are not personally protected by picking their own districts. Other times people mean incumbent neutrality regardless of who is drawing the lines – so no line is intentionally drawn to protect or disadvantage a sitting elected official. In this example we have the 2000 District for Sen. Bobby Rush. In 2002 after an unsuccessful challenge by a young upstart named Barack Obama, the lines were redrawn to exclude Barack Obama from Bobby Rush’s district. California, Arizona, Montana and Idaho insist upon incumbent and party-neutral redistricting practices as a matter of law. In other cases people frequently mean partisan balance, which as a practical matter is very hard to achieve given population patterns. In this example, PA Dist 6 is considered one of the most competitive districts in the country in terms of partisan balance but in order to achieve this result – compactness clearly suffers. Requiring the district to snake into other areas in an amoeba-like fashion.