2. Aim and Objectives
• Aim – In the next 10 minutes for you to
understand what Constructivism is in relation to
teaching and learning
• Objectives
• Describe what Constructivism is
• Identify the model for a Constructivist approach
• Examine the differences between a traditional
‘classroom’ and a Constructivist one
• Identify some ways the Constructivist approach
can be employed.
3. What is Constructivism?
• Constructivism is a philosophy of
learning founded on the premise that,
by reflecting on our experiences, we
construct our own understanding of
the world we live in. Each of us
generates our own “rules” and “mental
models,” which we use to make sense
of our experiences.
• http://www.learning-theories.com/
4. Who are the theorists?,
what did they say??
• Kant’s 200 year old theory!
• Piaget and Bruner
• Vygotksy
• Mezirow ( 1991 )
Jerome Bruner
5. Model of the Constructivist approach
As teachers we tend to make assumptions about the entry behaviour. what does that
Entry Behaviour
mean? – we think that some learners have a smattering of knowledge, some have
a wider range and some have none, this will differ from learner to learner
Modifying, adjusting, changing are all key elements in restructuring. This process
Restructuring
is down to the learner but also falls upon the teacher to design, plan and execute their
lesson effectively to ensure this stage is successful
Trying out ideas, concepts, working with different situations.
Applying
This is about reflection, looking at the changes, regarding ideas, views and concepts.
Review
6. Traditional
Constructivist
Emphasis on the Learner’s Learning is
Repetition
Emphasis on Strict adherence
bigbasic skills
concepts and questions and interactive,
to the fixed
expansion of the interests are building on what
curriculum
parts valued the student
already knows.
Teachers help
Learners are Teacher's role is
Teacher's role is Learner’s work,
Assessment is
learners construct
recipients of directive, rooted in
interactive, rooted observation,
through testing,
their own
knowledge. inauthority.
negotiation Process answers.
correct is
knowledge. important
Knowledge is
Knowledge Students work
Learners work
seen as inert.
dynamic, ever primarily in
alone
changing with our groups.
experiences.
7. More ways of using a
constructivist approach in
learning
• Encourage and accept autonomy and initiative.
• Use of manipulative, interactive, and physical materials.
• Search out students' understanding and prior experiences
about a concept before teaching it to them.
• Encourage communication between the teacher and the
students and also between the students.
• Encourage student critical thinking and inquiry by asking them
thoughtful, open-ended questions, and encourage them to ask
questions to each other.
• Ask follow up questions and seek elaboration after a student's
initial response.
• Put students in situations that might challenge their previous
conceptions and that will create contradictions that will
encourage discussion.
• Make sure to wait long enough after posing a question so that
the students have time to think about their answers and be
able to respond thoughtfully.
• Provide enough time for students to construct their own
meaning when learning something new.
8. • Reference List
• Reece, I & Walker,S. ( 1997 ) Teaching, Training and Learning
a practical guide: Business Education Publishers
• Fry,H.,et al. ( 2003 ) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in
Higher Education: Kogan Page
• Concept to Classroom (2004),Constructivism as a Paradigm for
Teaching and Learning
http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index.ht
( Accessed 2nd October 2009 )
• Kines,T. ( 2002 ), Jerome Bruner
http://oaks.nvg.org/jerome-bruner.html ( Accessed 2nd October
2009 )
• Hein, G. Prof. ( 1991 ) ,Constructivist Learning Theory
http://www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/resources/constructivistlearning
.html ( Accessed 2nd October 2009 )
• Atherton, J ( 2009 ), Constructivist Theory
http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/constructivism.htm
( Accessed 2nd October 2009 )
• Learning Theories. ( 2008 ), Index of Learning Theories and
Models http://www.learning-theories.com/
• ( Accessed 4th October 2009 )
Sounds like a complicated word, or at least it feels like what should follow is a complex set of learning theory ideas set to bamboozle and bewilder..but in actual fact it’s a lot simpler concept than might be first imagined. Here are 4 descriptions of different learning theories, what I would like you to do is to have a go at determining which one you think is the correct description of constructivism This term is taken from quite a nice little website called ( REVEAL ) Now we need to move that meaning / definiton and see how it applies in an educational sense….
Although many books, articles etc regarding constructivism were written within the last thirty or forty years we can actually go back over 200 years to see that Kant had theorised that our experiences lead to the formation of our general concepts ( i.e. our ideas, notions, our own theories, views etc ) and its these concepts or ‘constructs’ that become our models of reality. Leading on…. Piaget and Bruner are leading protagonists of more modern constructivist theory suggested that we all have past constructs ( we are not blank canvasses by any means! ) we possess our own experiences, but what is important in constructivism is that we fit new understanding ( what we are going to learn ) in with what we already know, so our new knowledge becomes an extension on what constructs we personally have experienced. Vygotksy – He came up with 2 definitions, "cognitive constructivism" which is about how the individual learner understands things, in terms of developmental stages and learning styles, and "social constructivism", which emphasises how meanings and understandings grow out of social encounters. In 1991 Mezirow was keen to tell us that it isnt simply adding more knowledge, that’s what the above description might be viewed as, a simple extension, it goes deeper, as a teacher it is important to consider how that change and transformation can take place, for example, what creative methods of teaching / learning can be employed to ensure understanding. And that should be better explained on the next slide……….
Entry Behaviour – What does that mean? – it basically means learners already have assumptions, previous knoweledge, some may have plenty of knowledge about a subject, some learners may have very little - Misconceptions – It is important that learners do not have a misconception before they look at any new concept, constructivism says that as teachers we need to examine present ideas, modify and in some cases abandon an idea before new meanings can be constructed. Restructuring – When we talk about restructuring what do we mean?
Emphasis on basic skills – Concentration on the AIMs and the OBJECTIVES. Strict adherence – Curriculum is still important, emphasis on what the learner knows, what they are interested in and what their values are. Repetition – Remember your schooldays!!, timetables, spellings etc!!, look at what the learner already knows, making learning as interactive and interesting as possible. Learners / recipients – In the traditional way we just are fed information, in the constructivist teachers are facilitators, helping learners to construct their own knowledge. Teachers role – Teacher engages learner interactively, there is negotiation. Assessment – Exam based, reliant etc, continual, learners progress as knowledge is built up, the process of getting there is paramount. Inert – Inert???, in this sense, staying the same, motionless, not changing Learners work alone – speaks for itself.
On researching the subject I discovered a webiste called Concept to Classroom, there was an interesting discussion which revealed this gem, Constructivism is also often misconstrued as a learning theory that compels Learners to "reinvent the wheel." Learners do not reinvent the wheel but, rather, attempt to understand how it turns, how it functions. They become engaged by applying their existing knowledge and real-world experience, learning to hypothesize, testing their theories, and ultimately drawing conclusions from their findings.