Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Projects in less time; 3 secrets to reducing project lead time, on time
1. Projects in Less Time
3 Secrets to Reducing Lead Time, On Time
Pinnacle Strategies
http://pinnacle-strategies.com
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 1
2. The Standish Group PDI Survey
75% of completed 91% finish “a little late”
projects are late 51% come in over
Average cost overruns budget
are 189% 63% overload resources
Average time overruns 38% do not meet
are 222% expectations
30% are cancelled before
they finished
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 2
3. Even though there are many types of projects,
the complaints are essentially the same.
• Deliveries are usually late UDE
• Too many changes UDE
UDE
• Over budget
• Excessive rework UDE
• Frequent priority battles
• Require resources with
limited availability
• Compromise scope for cost
or schedule
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 3
4. How to:
Make the
project an
Reduce enriching
project experience?
costs?
Improve
resource
productivity?
Reduce
project
lead times?
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 4
5. Why does project performance suffer?
Resources
Multitasking
PMs Focus
Planning
on the Past
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 5
6. The cost?
Many
Surprises
Many
Meetings
Resources
Multitasking
PMs Focus
Chronic
Planning
on the past Resource
Shortages
Unhappy
People
Poor
Results
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 6
7. 1st Secret to Projects in Less Time
Build good plans
◦ Focus on
deliverables
◦ Treat task
durations are
forecasts, not
commitments
◦ Recognize the
constraint
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 7
8. 2nd Secret to Projects in Less Time
Limit the amount of work in process
to maximize flow
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 8
9. 3rd Secret to Projects in Less Time
Team work around project completion
◦ Make the plan THE plan
◦ Stop blaming and get moving
◦ Focus on the future
◦ Use buffers as
risk management
tool for completion
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 9
10. “In preparing for
battle I have
always found
that plans are
useless, but
planning is
indispensable.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 10
11. We believe more time =
Greater reliability
Projects are longer than necessary
Projects have an oversupply of safety time
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 11
12. All task durations in the plan are a
forecast of how long it will take.
Safety Factor
Mean
0% 50% 95%
42.7% of all statistics are
made up on the spot.
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 12
13. Long task durations =
Long project duration
C1: 2d
A: 6d C2: 6d
D: 3d Finish
B: 7d C3: 4d
0 5 10 15
Does anyone actually believe the planned
durations will even be close to actual?
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 13
14. A second problem;
resource contention.
C1: 2d
A: 6d C2: 6d
D: 3d Finish
B: 7d C3: 4d
0 5 10 15
The plan is not feasible!
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 14
15. Steps to Build the Plan
1. Tasks with aggressive estimates
2. Identify the critical chain
3. Buffer the project completion
4. Add feeding buffers
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 15
16. Start with Aggressive Estimates
Create a network you can commit to
Estimate tasks at p50, or half the safe estimate
Start as late as possible
C1: 1d
A: 4d C2: 4d
D: 2d Finish
B: 5d C3: 2d
0 5 10 15 20
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 16
17. Create the Critical Chain
C1: 1d
A: 4d C2: 4d
D: 2d Finish
B: 5d C3: 2d
0 5 10 15 20
The longest sequence of dependent tasks
after resolving resource contention
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 17
20. CCPM Planning Principles
The plan is necessary, but, like a forecast,
will always be “wrong”.
Tasks are aggressive, but possible
Relationships are guided by technical
requirements, not preference
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 20
21. Time spent in planning
reduces overall project duration.
Builds consensus & teamwork
Identify early action needs
Resource needs identified early
Tests and validates the assumptions
Creates the baseline for action
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 21
29. Project teams are often devoted to
their individual agendas.
Protecting
reputations
Defending original
task duration
estimates
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 29
30. Human behavior causes the safety
built into tasks to be wasted.
Multi-tasking
Student Syndrome
Parkinson’s law
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 30
31. Multitasking Adds Significant Time
My Assignments
Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
10 days 10 days 10 days
Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
5 days 5 days 5 days 5 days 5 days 5 days
20 days
25 days
30 days
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 31
32. Multitasking Causes
Poor planning /
priority shifting
Drive to show
progress on all
projects
Earned value focus
on all activities
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 32
33. The way people work on a project
has a profound impact on its
duration.
Relay runner work ethic
Eliminate any penalty for missing task
estimates
One day response
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 33
34. The only meaningful measurement
of project status is the answer to
this question:
When will the
project be
complete?
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 34
35. What is the Status of This Project?
C1: 2d
A: 6d C2: 6d
D: 3d Finish
B: 7d C3: 4d
0 5 10 15
Task A is 20% complete • 25% Complete?
Task B is 70% complete • 8% Complete?
Task C1 is 50% complete
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 35
36. Project Status Calculation
Task Estimate % Complete Remaining % Complete
A 6 20% 4.8
C1 2 50% 1
C2 6 6
B 7 70% 2.1
C3 4 4
D 3 3
Total 28 20.9 25%
Critical 15 13.8 8%
Path
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 36
37. It’s hard to know where to focus
the team’s efforts.
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 37
38. The most successful projects
have the best negotiators leading
the project.
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 38
39. Buffer Burn Ratio is the guiding
measurement to project status.
Relationship
of buffer
consumption
to
Work
completed
Indication of Today
risk to
achieving
project due
date
Identifies the
work that is
important
NOW
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 39
40. Burn Ratio Directs the Action
When the % buffer
consumed is less than
Action
% of work Threshold
◦ Project is “green” Today
◦ Risk of being late is low
Planning
When the % buffer Threshold
consumed is greater
than % of work
◦ Project is “red”
◦ Project is at risk
◦ It’s time to do something
different
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 40
41. Burn Ratio shows snapshot of the
health of all the projects
The System Buffer Consumption Report
100%
Project Bengal Action
% PB Consumed
Jaguar
Threshold
Panther
Leopard lynx Planning
Cheetah Threshold
Cougar
0%
0% 100%
% CC Completed
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 41
42. Focus on Project Completion
Eliminate multi-tasking
◦ Don’t start a task unless it can be finished
◦ Project meetings focus when the next task
will be completed
Adopt the relay racer mentality
◦ Teamwork
◦ Full effort on tasks until completion
◦ 24 hour response time
During the project, measure quality, not
productivity
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 42
43. CCPM Execution Benefits
FOCUS
Significant reduction in behavioral delays
◦ Multi-tasking
◦ Student syndrome
Future-based management
Improved teamwork
Shorter execution times
Improved productivity
A good experience
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 43
44. CCPM Concerns
What to do with the extra capacity?
It’s hard to do?
Culture is a big obstacle?
Is software necessary?
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 44
45. Eight Steps to Implementation
1. Management consensus on the business
need
2. Buy-in on improvement potential
3. Buy-in on the rules and set ambitious
targets
4. Design the solution
5. Create the pipeline plan
6. Task management processes
7. Supporting processes implementation
8. Continue to improve
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 45
46. What can I do now?
Reduce the number of projects in
process
Allocate the available resources to
remaining open projects
Full-kit implementation
Reintroduce projects as other
projects are completed
Release new projects using CCPM
planning
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 46
47. CCPM In Projects
An
enriching
Reduced experience
costs
Improved
resource
productivity
Completed
in less time
http://pinnacle-strategies.com 47