SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Assessing the numeracy
skills of adult learners

Chris Lane
Ministry of Education


October 12
Presentation outline

Literacy and Numeracy for Adults Assessment Tool:

• Results from 2011 for three numeracy skills assessed

• Issues in measuring skills and gain

• General Numeracy profiles and gains according to
gender and qualification level
Assessment Tool 2011: Percentage of
assessments for each numeracy skill
               5.7

         8.8




                             General Numeracy

                             Number Knowledge

                             Number Strategies and
                             Measurement




                     85.5
Learning Progression Steps on first
                          assessment in 2011 for numeracy skills
                                          35
Percentage of first assessments in 2011




                                          30

                                          25

                                          20

                                          15

                                          10

                                          5

                                          0
                                               General Numeracy             Number Knowledge                Number Strategies and
                                                                                                               Measurement
                                                                              Numeracy skill

                                                          Step 1   Step 2   Step 3   Step 4    Step 5   Step 6
Correlations between first assessment
scores for the three numeracy skills

                       Number Number Strategies
                      Knowledge and Measurement
                             0.81           0.75
  General Numeracy
  Number Strategies         0.83
  and Measurement
Percentage of learners reassessed for
                  numeracy skills, by initial Step
                                            50
Percentage of learners reassessed in 2011




                                            45
                                            40
                                            35
                                            30
                                            25
                                            20
                                            15
                                            10
                                            5
                                            0
                                                 General Numeracy            Number Knowledge              Number Strategies and
                                                                                                              Measurement
                                                                                Skill assessed

                                                         Step 1     Step 2   Step 3   Step 4     Step 5   Step 6
Statistically significant gain for numeracy
                                  skills in 2011, by first assessment step
                                           70
Percentage with significant gain in 2011




                                           60


                                           50


                                           40


                                           30


                                           20


                                           10


                                           0
                                                General Numeracy                Number Knowledge            Number Strategies and Measurement
                                                                       Numeracy skill assessed and reassessed

                                                              Step 1   Step 2   Step 3   Step 4   Step 5   Step 6
Issues in measuring skills and gain

• Coverage: percentage of learners assessed, reassessed
• Composition: different learner mixes in different programs
• Random variation, measurement error
• Assessment type: adaptive (full, snapshot), non-adaptive
• Preparation, engagement and motivation
• Greater gains for those who initially score low: more scope
for improvement, more educational attention, support from
peers?
• Practice effect: learning the assessment vs learning the
skill
Learning Progression Steps at first assessment for
General Numeracy, by gender
                                           35
 Percentage of first assessments in 2011




                                           30

                                           25

                                           20

                                           15

                                           10

                                           5

                                           0
                                                 Female                                            Male
                                                                            Gender

                                                Step 1    Step 2   Step 3     Step 4   Step 5   Step 6
Percentage of learners with significant gain for
                           General Numeracy, by initial Step and gender
                                           70
Percentage with significant gain in 2011




                                           60

                                           50

                                           40

                                           30

                                           20

                                           10

                                           0
                                                Female                                              Male
                                                                           Gender

                                                Step 1   Step 2   Step 3     Step 4   Step 5   Step 6
First assessment Steps for General Numeracy
                              in 2011, by qualification level
                                          45
Percentage of first assessments in 2011




                                          40

                                          35

                                          30

                                          25

                                          20

                                          15

                                          10

                                          5

                                          0
                                               Level 1   Level 2            Level 3           Level 4        Levels 5-7   Bachelors+
                                                                             Level of qualification

                                                         Step 1    Step 2    Step 3    Step 4    Step 5   Step 6
Percentage of learners reassessed for General
                      Numeracy, by initial Step and qualification level
                                           50
Percentge of learners reassessed in 2011




                                           45

                                           40

                                           35

                                           30

                                           25

                                           20

                                           15

                                           10

                                           5

                                           0
                                                Level 1   Level 2     Level 3       Level 4     Levels 5-7   Bachelors+
                                                                    NZQF level of qualification
Percentage of learners with significant gain for
                                     General Numeracy, by initial Step and
                                     qualification level
                                           60
Percentage with significant gain in 2011




                                           50


                                           40


                                           30


                                           20


                                           10


                                           0
                                                Level 1                         Level 2                        Level 3
                                                                       NZQF level of qualification

                                                     Step 1   Step 2     Step 3    Step 4    Step 5   Step 6

More Related Content

More from NTLT Conference

NTLT 2013 - Marjolein Schaddelee - Learning through project-based learning
NTLT 2013 - Marjolein Schaddelee - Learning through project-based learningNTLT 2013 - Marjolein Schaddelee - Learning through project-based learning
NTLT 2013 - Marjolein Schaddelee - Learning through project-based learningNTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - John Mumford - Math Anxiety: Risk Factors, Strategies, & Opportun...
NTLT 2013 - John Mumford - Math Anxiety: Risk Factors, Strategies, & Opportun...NTLT 2013 - John Mumford - Math Anxiety: Risk Factors, Strategies, & Opportun...
NTLT 2013 - John Mumford - Math Anxiety: Risk Factors, Strategies, & Opportun...NTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - Peter Coolbear - Supporting the success of priority learners – tr...
NTLT 2013 - Peter Coolbear - Supporting the success of priority learners – tr...NTLT 2013 - Peter Coolbear - Supporting the success of priority learners – tr...
NTLT 2013 - Peter Coolbear - Supporting the success of priority learners – tr...NTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - The agency project
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - The agency projectNTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - The agency project
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - The agency projectNTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - Technology and Teaching: A case study of softw...
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - Technology and Teaching: A case study of softw...NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - Technology and Teaching: A case study of softw...
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - Technology and Teaching: A case study of softw...NTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - Mentoring: from research to realisation
NTLT 2013 - Mentoring: from research to realisationNTLT 2013 - Mentoring: from research to realisation
NTLT 2013 - Mentoring: from research to realisationNTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - Brent Kennard, Sheran Merritt and Graeme Read - Going the extra mile
NTLT 2013 - Brent Kennard, Sheran Merritt and Graeme Read - Going the extra mileNTLT 2013 - Brent Kennard, Sheran Merritt and Graeme Read - Going the extra mile
NTLT 2013 - Brent Kennard, Sheran Merritt and Graeme Read - Going the extra mileNTLT Conference
 
Default slide for hansen hall
Default slide for hansen hallDefault slide for hansen hall
Default slide for hansen hallNTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - Teaching and Learning Conference windup
NTLT 2013 - Teaching and Learning Conference windupNTLT 2013 - Teaching and Learning Conference windup
NTLT 2013 - Teaching and Learning Conference windupNTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - Willie Campbell - Windows to Contextual Learning The Jo Hari Model
NTLT 2013 - Willie Campbell - Windows to Contextual Learning The Jo Hari ModelNTLT 2013 - Willie Campbell - Windows to Contextual Learning The Jo Hari Model
NTLT 2013 - Willie Campbell - Windows to Contextual Learning The Jo Hari ModelNTLT Conference
 
6 stuart middleton friday 4 oct - 11 am
6 stuart middleton   friday 4 oct - 11 am6 stuart middleton   friday 4 oct - 11 am
6 stuart middleton friday 4 oct - 11 amNTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - Stuart Middleton - Memento Park or 21st Century?
NTLT 2013 - Stuart Middleton - Memento Park or 21st Century?NTLT 2013 - Stuart Middleton - Memento Park or 21st Century?
NTLT 2013 - Stuart Middleton - Memento Park or 21st Century?NTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - Kerry Reid-Searl - ‘SUSPENSION IN DISBELIEF’ AN INNOVATIVE APPROA...
NTLT 2013 - Kerry Reid-Searl - ‘SUSPENSION IN DISBELIEF’ AN INNOVATIVE APPROA...NTLT 2013 - Kerry Reid-Searl - ‘SUSPENSION IN DISBELIEF’ AN INNOVATIVE APPROA...
NTLT 2013 - Kerry Reid-Searl - ‘SUSPENSION IN DISBELIEF’ AN INNOVATIVE APPROA...NTLT Conference
 
3a john hitchcock pre session jazz pix
3a john hitchcock pre session jazz pix3a john hitchcock pre session jazz pix
3a john hitchcock pre session jazz pixNTLT Conference
 
3 john mumford math anxiety
3 john mumford   math anxiety3 john mumford   math anxiety
3 john mumford math anxietyNTLT Conference
 
NTLT 2013 - John Hitchcock - Collaboration: Friend or Foe?
NTLT 2013 - John Hitchcock - Collaboration: Friend or Foe?NTLT 2013 - John Hitchcock - Collaboration: Friend or Foe?
NTLT 2013 - John Hitchcock - Collaboration: Friend or Foe?NTLT Conference
 

More from NTLT Conference (20)

NTLT 2013 - Marjolein Schaddelee - Learning through project-based learning
NTLT 2013 - Marjolein Schaddelee - Learning through project-based learningNTLT 2013 - Marjolein Schaddelee - Learning through project-based learning
NTLT 2013 - Marjolein Schaddelee - Learning through project-based learning
 
NTLT 2013 - John Mumford - Math Anxiety: Risk Factors, Strategies, & Opportun...
NTLT 2013 - John Mumford - Math Anxiety: Risk Factors, Strategies, & Opportun...NTLT 2013 - John Mumford - Math Anxiety: Risk Factors, Strategies, & Opportun...
NTLT 2013 - John Mumford - Math Anxiety: Risk Factors, Strategies, & Opportun...
 
NTLT 2013 - Peter Coolbear - Supporting the success of priority learners – tr...
NTLT 2013 - Peter Coolbear - Supporting the success of priority learners – tr...NTLT 2013 - Peter Coolbear - Supporting the success of priority learners – tr...
NTLT 2013 - Peter Coolbear - Supporting the success of priority learners – tr...
 
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - The agency project
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - The agency projectNTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - The agency project
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - The agency project
 
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - Technology and Teaching: A case study of softw...
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - Technology and Teaching: A case study of softw...NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - Technology and Teaching: A case study of softw...
NTLT 2013 - Georgie Gaddum - Technology and Teaching: A case study of softw...
 
NTLT 2013 - Michael Few
NTLT 2013 - Michael FewNTLT 2013 - Michael Few
NTLT 2013 - Michael Few
 
NTLT 2013 - Mentoring: from research to realisation
NTLT 2013 - Mentoring: from research to realisationNTLT 2013 - Mentoring: from research to realisation
NTLT 2013 - Mentoring: from research to realisation
 
NTLT 2013 - Brent Kennard, Sheran Merritt and Graeme Read - Going the extra mile
NTLT 2013 - Brent Kennard, Sheran Merritt and Graeme Read - Going the extra mileNTLT 2013 - Brent Kennard, Sheran Merritt and Graeme Read - Going the extra mile
NTLT 2013 - Brent Kennard, Sheran Merritt and Graeme Read - Going the extra mile
 
Dinner
DinnerDinner
Dinner
 
Default slide for hansen hall
Default slide for hansen hallDefault slide for hansen hall
Default slide for hansen hall
 
NTLT 2013 - Teaching and Learning Conference windup
NTLT 2013 - Teaching and Learning Conference windupNTLT 2013 - Teaching and Learning Conference windup
NTLT 2013 - Teaching and Learning Conference windup
 
NTLT 2013 - Willie Campbell - Windows to Contextual Learning The Jo Hari Model
NTLT 2013 - Willie Campbell - Windows to Contextual Learning The Jo Hari ModelNTLT 2013 - Willie Campbell - Windows to Contextual Learning The Jo Hari Model
NTLT 2013 - Willie Campbell - Windows to Contextual Learning The Jo Hari Model
 
6 stuart middleton friday 4 oct - 11 am
6 stuart middleton   friday 4 oct - 11 am6 stuart middleton   friday 4 oct - 11 am
6 stuart middleton friday 4 oct - 11 am
 
NTLT 2013 - Stuart Middleton - Memento Park or 21st Century?
NTLT 2013 - Stuart Middleton - Memento Park or 21st Century?NTLT 2013 - Stuart Middleton - Memento Park or 21st Century?
NTLT 2013 - Stuart Middleton - Memento Park or 21st Century?
 
NTLT 2013 - Kerry Reid-Searl - ‘SUSPENSION IN DISBELIEF’ AN INNOVATIVE APPROA...
NTLT 2013 - Kerry Reid-Searl - ‘SUSPENSION IN DISBELIEF’ AN INNOVATIVE APPROA...NTLT 2013 - Kerry Reid-Searl - ‘SUSPENSION IN DISBELIEF’ AN INNOVATIVE APPROA...
NTLT 2013 - Kerry Reid-Searl - ‘SUSPENSION IN DISBELIEF’ AN INNOVATIVE APPROA...
 
4 brent phillips
4 brent phillips4 brent phillips
4 brent phillips
 
3a john hitchcock pre session jazz pix
3a john hitchcock pre session jazz pix3a john hitchcock pre session jazz pix
3a john hitchcock pre session jazz pix
 
3 marjolein schaddelee
3 marjolein schaddelee3 marjolein schaddelee
3 marjolein schaddelee
 
3 john mumford math anxiety
3 john mumford   math anxiety3 john mumford   math anxiety
3 john mumford math anxiety
 
NTLT 2013 - John Hitchcock - Collaboration: Friend or Foe?
NTLT 2013 - John Hitchcock - Collaboration: Friend or Foe?NTLT 2013 - John Hitchcock - Collaboration: Friend or Foe?
NTLT 2013 - John Hitchcock - Collaboration: Friend or Foe?
 

Recently uploaded

DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptxDIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptxMichelleTuguinay1
 
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptxCLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptxAnupam32727
 
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
Reading and Writing Skills 11 quarter 4 melc 1
Reading and Writing Skills 11 quarter 4 melc 1Reading and Writing Skills 11 quarter 4 melc 1
Reading and Writing Skills 11 quarter 4 melc 1GloryAnnCastre1
 
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptxmary850239
 
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their usesSulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their usesVijayaLaxmi84
 
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptxmary850239
 
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWMythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
ClimART Action | eTwinning Project
ClimART Action    |    eTwinning ProjectClimART Action    |    eTwinning Project
ClimART Action | eTwinning Projectjordimapav
 
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxBIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxSayali Powar
 
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnvESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnvRicaMaeCastro1
 
Expanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operationalExpanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operationalssuser3e220a
 
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea DevelopmentUsing Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Developmentchesterberbo7
 
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationCongestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationdeepaannamalai16
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemChristalin Nelson
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of EngineeringFaculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
 
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptxDIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
 
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptxCLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
 
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
 
Reading and Writing Skills 11 quarter 4 melc 1
Reading and Writing Skills 11 quarter 4 melc 1Reading and Writing Skills 11 quarter 4 melc 1
Reading and Writing Skills 11 quarter 4 melc 1
 
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
 
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their usesSulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
 
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
 
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Professionprashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
 
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
 
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
 
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWMythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
ClimART Action | eTwinning Project
ClimART Action    |    eTwinning ProjectClimART Action    |    eTwinning Project
ClimART Action | eTwinning Project
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
 
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxBIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
 
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnvESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
 
Expanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operationalExpanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operational
 
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea DevelopmentUsing Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
 
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationCongestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
 

NTLT 2012 - Assessing the numeracy skills of tertiary learners

  • 1. Assessing the numeracy skills of adult learners Chris Lane Ministry of Education October 12
  • 2. Presentation outline Literacy and Numeracy for Adults Assessment Tool: • Results from 2011 for three numeracy skills assessed • Issues in measuring skills and gain • General Numeracy profiles and gains according to gender and qualification level
  • 3. Assessment Tool 2011: Percentage of assessments for each numeracy skill 5.7 8.8 General Numeracy Number Knowledge Number Strategies and Measurement 85.5
  • 4. Learning Progression Steps on first assessment in 2011 for numeracy skills 35 Percentage of first assessments in 2011 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 General Numeracy Number Knowledge Number Strategies and Measurement Numeracy skill Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
  • 5. Correlations between first assessment scores for the three numeracy skills Number Number Strategies Knowledge and Measurement 0.81 0.75 General Numeracy Number Strategies 0.83 and Measurement
  • 6. Percentage of learners reassessed for numeracy skills, by initial Step 50 Percentage of learners reassessed in 2011 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 General Numeracy Number Knowledge Number Strategies and Measurement Skill assessed Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
  • 7. Statistically significant gain for numeracy skills in 2011, by first assessment step 70 Percentage with significant gain in 2011 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 General Numeracy Number Knowledge Number Strategies and Measurement Numeracy skill assessed and reassessed Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
  • 8. Issues in measuring skills and gain • Coverage: percentage of learners assessed, reassessed • Composition: different learner mixes in different programs • Random variation, measurement error • Assessment type: adaptive (full, snapshot), non-adaptive • Preparation, engagement and motivation • Greater gains for those who initially score low: more scope for improvement, more educational attention, support from peers? • Practice effect: learning the assessment vs learning the skill
  • 9. Learning Progression Steps at first assessment for General Numeracy, by gender 35 Percentage of first assessments in 2011 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Female Male Gender Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
  • 10. Percentage of learners with significant gain for General Numeracy, by initial Step and gender 70 Percentage with significant gain in 2011 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Female Male Gender Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
  • 11. First assessment Steps for General Numeracy in 2011, by qualification level 45 Percentage of first assessments in 2011 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Levels 5-7 Bachelors+ Level of qualification Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
  • 12. Percentage of learners reassessed for General Numeracy, by initial Step and qualification level 50 Percentge of learners reassessed in 2011 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Levels 5-7 Bachelors+ NZQF level of qualification
  • 13. Percentage of learners with significant gain for General Numeracy, by initial Step and qualification level 60 Percentage with significant gain in 2011 50 40 30 20 10 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 NZQF level of qualification Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6

Editor's Notes

  1. Based on records of 81,000 numeracy assessments in 2011.
  2. Steps 1-6 in the legend refer to the Learning Progressions steps corresponding to learners’ first assessment scores in 2011.Based on records of approximately 50,000 learners assessed at least once in 2011 for General Numeracy; approximately 5,900 learners assessed at least once for Number Knowledge; and approximately 3,800 assessed at least once for Number Strategies and Measurement.
  3. Based on approximately 2,700 learners assessed for both General Numeracy and Number Knowledge; approximately 1,700 assessed for both General Numeracy and Number Strategies and Measurement; and approximately 1,000 assessed for both Number Knowledge and Number Strategies and Measurement.
  4. Steps 1-6 in the legend refer to the Learning Progressions steps corresponding to learners’ first assessment scores in 2011.Based on records of approximately 50,000 learners assessed at least once in 2011 for General Numeracy; approximately 5,900 learners assessed at least once for Number Knowledge; and approximately 3,800 assessed at least once for Number Strategies and Measurement.
  5. Steps 1-6 in the legend refer to the Learning Progressions steps corresponding to learners’ first assessment scores in 2011.Based on records of approximately 16,000 learners assessed more than once in 2011 for General Numeracy; approximately 1,100 learners assessed more than once in 2011 for Number Knowledge, and approximately 600 learners assessed more than once in 2011 for Number Strategies and Measurement.For General Numeracy, the number of reassessed learners at each first assessment step was: Step 1: 700Step 2: 1,000Step 3: 3,300Step 4: 4,300Step 5: 4,600Step 6: 2,100
  6. Steps 1-6 in the legend refer to the Learning Progressions steps corresponding to learners’ first assessment scores in 2011.Based on records of approximately 21,000 female and approximately 30,000 male learners assessed at least once in 2011 for General Numeracy.
  7. Steps 1-6 in the legend refer to the Learning Progressions steps corresponding to learners’ first assessment scores in 2011.Based on records of approximately 8,000 female and 8,000 male learners assessed more than once in 2011 for General Numeracy;
  8. Steps 1-6 in the legend refer to the Learning Progressions steps corresponding to learners’ first assessment scores in 2011.Based on records of approximately 29,000learners whose qualification level could be identified and who were assessed at least once in 2011 for General Numeracy.
  9. Steps 1-6 in the legend refer to the Learning Progressions steps corresponding to learners’ first assessment scores in 2011.Based on records of approximately 29,000learners whose qualification level could be identified and who were assessed at least once in 2011 for General Numeracy.
  10. Steps 1-6 in the legend refer to the Learning Progressions steps corresponding to learners’ first assessment scores in 2011.Based on records of approximately 8,900learners whose qualification level could be identified as Level 1, 2 or 3, and who were assessed more than once in 2011 for General Numeracy.