4. OBJECTIFS DU TRAITEMENT DE
L’HÉPATITE CHRONIQUE B?
- Arrêter la multiplication virale
- Diminuer l’activité de l ’hépatite chronique
- Arrêter l’évolution de la fibrose
(régression?)
- Prévenir l’évolution vers la cirrhose
- Prévenir les complications
- Prévenir le CHC
- Prévenir la mortalité
5. OBJECTIFS DU TRAITEMENT
Anti-Hbe Anti-HBs
AgHBe
ADN VHB négatif positif AgHBs positif
négatif négatif
TEMPS
8. COMMENT OPTIMISER LE TRAITEMENT DE
L’HÉPATITE CHRONIQUE B?
-Traiter les malades qui en ont besoin
(risque de complications)
- Traiter les malades qui ont de bonnes
chances de répondre
10. PHASE DE TOLÉRANCE IMMUNITAIRE
= MAUVAISE RÉPONSE
ADN VHB > 7 log ALAT < N
AgHBe + PBH = A1F1
RÉPONSE
IMMUNITAIRE
MULTIPLICATION
VIRALE
11. PHASE DE RÉACTION IMMUNITAIRE
= BONNE RÉPONSE
ADN VHB < 7 log ALAT > N
AgHBe +/- PBH > A1F1
MULTIPLICATION
VIRALE
RÉPONSE
IMMUNITAIRE
12. CHARGE VIRALE ET STADE DE L’HC B
10 10
10 9
10 8
10 7
Hé patite
10 6
chronique
10 5
10 4
AgHBe -
Porteur
10 3
10 2
inactif
10
Martinot et al. J Hepatol 2002
13. COMMENT DISTINGUER LE PORTAGE INACTIF
DE L’HCA AgHBe -
10 10 LE SUIVI +++
10 9
10 8
Hé patite chronique AgHBe -
10 7
10 6
10 5
10 4
10 3 Porteur inactif
10 2
10
1 2 Années 3 4 5
Asselah et al. GCB 2005
14. QUI TRAITER
Guidelines EASL
1. Indications semblables pour
HC AgHBe + ou AgHBe -
2. Indication dépend de:
- ADN VHB
- ALAT
- PBH
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
15. QUI TRAITER
Guidelines EASL
AgHBe + et AgHBe -
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
16. QUI TRAITER
Guidelines EASL
AgHBe + et AgHBe -
ADN VHB < 4 log
ALAT = N
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
17. QUI TRAITER
Guidelines EASL
AgHBe + et AgHBe -
ADN VHB < 4 log
ALAT = N
Surveiller
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
18. QUI TRAITER
Guidelines EASL
AgHBe + et AgHBe -
ADN VHB < 4 log ADN VHB > 4 log
ALAT = N et/ou ALAT > N
PBH > A1/F1
Surveiller
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
19. QUI TRAITER
Guidelines EASL
AgHBe + et AgHBe -
ADN VHB < 4 log ADN VHB > 4 log
ALAT = N Et/ou ALAT > N
PBH > A1F1
Surveiller Traiter
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
30. TENOFOVIR
ADN VHB NÉGATIF A 1 et 5 ANS
93%
87%*
73% 65%*
*98%
Per protocol
AgHBe + AgHBe -
.
Marcellin et al. NEJM 2008 Marcellin et al. AASLD 2011
31. Histologie à 5 ans de Traitement
n=348
100%
Ishak Fibrosis Score
90% 6
5
80%
s
4
3
70%
2
60% 1
0
50%
40%
30%
P
o
g
n
a
c
e
r
f
t
i
20%
10%
0
Baselin e Year 1 Year 5
Marcellin et al. AASLD 2011
32. Cumulative incidence of HBV
resistance
100%
90% Year 1
Year 2
80% Year 3
70%
70% Year 4
67%
Year 5
60%
49%
50%
40% 38%
29%
30%
24%
22%
20% 18%
11%
10% 4%
3%
0% 0.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%
LAM ADV ETV LdT TDF
33. NO CORRELATION BETWEEN ANTIVIRAL
POTENCY AND HBs SEROCONVERSION*
HBV DNA HBs
decrease (log) loss
- Lamivudine 5.0 0%
- Adefovir 4.0 0%
- Entecavir 7.0 2%**
- Telbivudine 6.5 0%
- Tenofovir 5.5 3%**
* One year ** Only in HBeAg-
34. TREATMENT OF CHRONIC HEPATITIS B
WITH ANALOGUES: LIMITATIONS
- HBV DNA must be undetectable to prevent
resistance
- HBe seroconversion inconstant despite
virological response
- Risk of resistance on the long term?
- Tolerance on the long term?
- Importance of compliance
- When to stop?
- HBsAg loss rare
36. THE IMPORTANCE OF HBsAg LOSS
- Ultimate goal of therapy
- Closest to cure
- Not HBV eradication but associated with
improved prognosis
Marcellin et al. Annals Intern Med 1990
Loriot et al. Hepatology 1992
37. HBsAg AND THE RISK OF HCC
11,893 men in Taiwan
HBsAg HBeAg ALT Relative Risk
-- -- normal 1
-- -- elevated 5
+ -- normal 10
+ -- elevated 30
+ + normal 60
+ + elevated 110
Yang et al. NEJM 2002
38. HBsAg Loss is Associated with Improved
Survival
309 cirrhotics with a mean follow-up of 6 years
100 HBsAg
loss
80
60 P<0.001 No HBsAg
Survival (%)
40 loss
20
2
1 (years)3 4 5 6 7
Time
Fattovich et al. Am J Gastroenterology 1998
39. Cumulative Incidence of HBs
INCIDENCE DE LA NÉGATIVATION DE L’AgHBs
EN FONCTION DE LA SÉROCONVERSION HBe
Seroconversion
1,0
0,8
64%
0,6
p<0,001
0,4
17%
0,2
0,0
0 5 10 15
Tim ( ea )
e Y rs
Moucari et al. J Hepatol 2009
42. INCIDENCE OF HBsAg LOSS ACCORDING TO
RESPONSE TO IFN (HBe seroconversion)
1,0
0,8
Réponse : 64%
0,6
p<.001
0,4
Seroconversion
Non réponse : 17%
0,2
Cumulative Incidence of HBsAg
0,0
0 5 10 15
Tim (Y rs
e ea )
Moucari et al. J Hepatol 2009
45. HBsAg LOSS after PEG IFN ± LAM
12
11
9
6
5
0
%
1 an 2 ans 3 ans 4 ans 5 ans
Marcellin et al. NEJM 2004
Marcellin et al. Gastroenterology 2009
Marcellin et al. Hepatology International. In press
46. HBsAg LOSS 64% of the
patients HBV DNA
negative
12
11
9
6
5
0
%
1 an 2 ans 3 ans 4 ans 5 ans
Marcellin et al. NEJM 2004
Marcellin et al. Gastroenterology 2009
Marcellin et al. APASL 2009
47. HOW TO TREAT
EASL Guidelines
HBeAg + or HBeAg -
• EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
48. HOW TO TREAT
EASL Guidelines
HBeAg + or HBeAg -
PEG IFN
HBV DNA < 7 log (copies)*
ALT > 3N
• 2 million IU
• EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
49. HOW TO TREAT
EASL Guidelines
HBeAg + or HBeAg -
PEG IFN
HBV DNA < 7 log (copies)*
ALT > 3N
HBV DNA < 1 log at S12
• 2 million IU
• EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
50. HOW TO TREAT
EASL Guidelines
HBeAg + or HBeAg -
PEG IFN ANALOGUE
HBV DNA < 7 log (copies)* Entecavir or Tenofovir
ALT > 3N or Telbivudine
HBV DNA < 1 log at S12
• 2 million IU
• EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
51. HOW TO TREAT
EASL Guidelines
HBeAg + or HBeAg -
PEG IFN ANALOGUE
HBV DNA < 7 log (copies)* Entecavir or Tenofovir
ALT > 3N or Telbivudine
HBV DNA < 1 log at S12
• 2 million IU
• EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
52. HOW TO TREAT
EASL Guidelines
HBeAg + or HBeAg -
PEG IFN ANALOGUE
HBV DNA < 7 log (copies)* Entecavir or Tenofovir
ALT < 3N or Telbivudine
HBV DNA < 1 log at S12 If HBV DNA + at S24-48
• 2 million IU Change analogue
• EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B.
J Hepatol 2009
54. HBsAg ACCORDING TO TREATMENT
Weeks
LAM
Median log10 IU/mL
PEG-IFNα-2a
+ LAM
PEG-IFNα-2a
Treatment
Marcellin et al. Hepatology International. In press
55. HBsAg Kinetics: PEG IFN
SVR (+)
HBsAg (Log10 U/ml)
HBV DNA (Log10 copies/ml)
Treatment Moucari et al. Hepatology 2009
56. HBsAg Kinetics: PEG IFN
SVR (-)
HBsAg (Log10 U/ml)
HBV DNA (Log10 copies/ml)
Moucari et al. Hepatology 2009
57. Quantification of HBsAg: “Stopping Rule”
Early Serological Response = 0.5 log at W12
ESR + PPV = 89 %
48 Patients SVR
treated with Sustained Virological
PEG IFN a2a response
ESR - NPV = 90 %
Moucari et al. Hepatology 2009
63. SVR patient with HBsAg loss
Log10 IU/ml
Marcellin et al. AASLD 2011
64. Conclusion
La quantification de l’AgHBs a une forte VPN:
- AgHBs à J0 > 3000 UI: 89%
- AgHBs diminué de moins de 0,5 log à S24: 86%
Ces résultats suggèrent qu’il est possible de
sélectionner les bons répondeurs avant
traitement et de considérer un arrêt à S24.
Marcellin P et al . Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:808 − 816. Lai CL et al. Telbivudine versus lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med . 2007;357:2576−2588. Chang TT et al. A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1001−1010. Heathcote J et al. A randomized, double blind, comparison of tenofovir DF (TDF) versus adefovir diprivoxil (ADV) for the treatment of HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB): study GS-US-174−0103. Hepatology . 2007;46(4 suppl 1):861A (Abstract LB6). Hadziyannis S et al. Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen- negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med . 2003;348:800−807. Lai CL et al. Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med . 2006;354:1011−1020. Marcellin P et al. A randomized, double blind, comparison of tenofovir DF (TDF) versus adefovir diprivoxil (ADV) for the treatment of HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB): study GS-US-174-0102. Hepatology . 2007;46(4 suppl 1):290A−291A (Abstract LB2).
Therapeutic Response HBV DNA suppressed to ≤ 5 log 10 , with ALT normalized OR HBeAg loss
Therapeutic Response HBV DNA suppressed to ≤ 5 log 10 , with ALT normalized OR HBeAg loss
6
6
6
6
6
6
Patients were selected for HBsAg analysis, who reached week 24 of study There were no significant differences between the 3 treatment arms