Low-Cost Design of Arsenic Removal from Groundwater
Jeremy Kozub*, Kevin Banahan*, Jesse Amsel*
*Wentworth Institute of Technology, Environmental Engineering Program, Class of 2005 (Jack Duggan, Ph.D., P.E., faculty advisor)
For this project, a student team designed and evaluated treatment alternatives for the removal of arsenic from groundwater used in developing countries. The application of sorption technologies was evaluated using bench-scale testing of a range of sorption materials, support media and differing contact geometries. Sorption capacity of treatment units were designed to accommodate the daily consumption of individual families using a community well in Bangladesh.
Until the early 1990's, there was little awareness that groundwater in Bangladesh contained high levels of arsenic. The adverse health affects of chronic exposure to arsenic are well documented. Although current technologies to treat arsenic in groundwater exist, there are economic, social and cultural factors that prevent these technologies from being used in Bangladesh. This project focused on developing a low-cost alternative technology that could be readily assembled and implemented by local villagers.
As a capstone project for the environmental engineering program at Wentworth of Technology, this project has been performed by three students under the supervision of a faculty advisor. Students applied previous coursework in the areas of economics, engineering theory and application, design, communication skills and ethical principles to complete this project. The project was performed in collaboration with external non-profit and non-governmental organizations. The goal of this project is to further develop the creation of a low-cost system that will become available to large populations of those in need.
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
Low Cost Design of Arsenic Removal from Groundwater in Bangladesh
1. Low Cost Design of Arsenic Removal from Groundwater in Bangladesh Kevin Banahan | Jeremy Kozub | Jesse Amsel Wentworth Institute of Technology Environmental Engineering Capstone Spring 2005
12. Effect of Particle Size on Sorption Arsenic Mass Partitioning Parts per Billion of Ingestible Arsenic (Initial Concentration = 400 ppb) Aqueous Suspended Solids Settled Solids 70 185 Rinsed Sorbent 40 400 Sorbent w/ fines settled mixed
13.
14. Sorption Material Balance to Determine Sorptive Capacity mg/g 0.009 mass/mass sorptive capacity g 38 Mass Sorbent mg 0.344 Mass Sorbed L 2 Volume Treated mg/L 0.128 Final Conc mg/L 0.3 Initial Conc
-Before gaining independence the people of Bangladesh used surface water for all of their needs. -Water was contaminated with microbes that caused everything from diarrhea and Colera - Department of Public Health (DPH) and United Children’s Fund (UNICEF) -in the 80’s the goal of providing 80 % population well water was surpassed - 8-12 million wells were drilled to provide microbial safe drinking water -90% of the Bangladesh population of 130 million prefer to drink well water -Mid 1990’s was when the Arsenic Problem first hit the Radar Painted wells Safe and unsafe wells -The max allowable concentrations of 50 ug/L was lowered to 10 ug/L in 1993 - In New Jersey the allowable concentration will be lowered to 5 ug/L in 2006
-There are Different opinions -1.) Arsenic is released by oxidation of pyrite in the sediments as the aquifer drawdown permits atmospheric oxygen to invade the aquifer ( Pyrite is a sink for not a source for Arsenic ) When the wells are pumped the oxygen from the air oxidized the pyrite and the arsenic is released… -2.) Arsenic sorbed to aquifer minerals are displaced into solution by exchange of phosphates from over application of fertilizer to surface soils -3.) anoxic conditions permit reduction of iron oxyhydroxides (FeOOH) and release sorbed arsenic to solution FeOOH - Ferric Oxide CH 3 COO - Acetate H 2 CO 3 – Carbonic acid HCO 3 – Bicarbonate H 2 O - Water
Groundwater composition 1 L synthetic groundwater = 0.132 mL As(III) +0.188 g CaCl 2 + 0.255 g MgCl 2 + 0.012 g KCl Model of groundwater samples taken from wells in Bangladesh Very important to have chlorine ion’s present because it coverts arsenite to arsenate in the presence of atmospheric oxygen Arsenite (AsIII) = H 3 AsO 3 Arsenate (AsV) = H 3 AsO 4 Arsenic as As(V) is easier to remove Arsenate reacts with iron oxide (in crushed sorbent material) and sorbs to the surface of the crushed sorbent material leaving only clean water to filter through
JESSE Low cost Simple to make Easy to use Constructed of local materials Takes advantage of native labor
Client Statement – to develop a low-cost treatment system for the removal of Arsenic from groundwater in Bangladesh Problem Definition – Clarify Objectives - <50 ppb Establish User Requirements – family scale, easy to use Identify Constraints – transport of the water Establish Functions – adsorption system Conceptual Design – Establish Design Specifications – isotherms, retention time Generate Alternatives – tea bag, loose sorbent, column Preliminary Design – Model or analyze design Validation of analytical method - HACH kit Refining synthetic groundwater creation Saturation experiments – write up’s Regeneration experiments – write up’s Detailed Design – Choose a design to experiment with Refine and optimize design Construct scaled design Test and evaluate design Design Communication – Documentation – analytical method, groundwater creation, lab activities, experiments Final Design – Final report Interpretation of data Specifications for suggested design
10 g of sorbent with 75 ml increments of 132 ppb arsenic groundwater
Sorbent Material has 2 dominant sizes. 50 sieve size particles Retained Fines Fines have much higher surface area to mass ratio which may greatly influence the sorptive capacity.
The use of Plastic hosing, stands, beakers, metal screen was for lavatory accuracy.. The column may be modified using these materials Safi Cloth- used from a filter, it can be folded so the fabric fibers cross and create a very fine screen Clay pots could be used (maybe a Spick-it) to feed the water into the top and catch the water at the bottom of the column.