This document provides an overview of the historical methodologies used in English as a second language instruction. It defines key terms related to approaches, methods, techniques, curriculum, and methodology. It then summarizes several prominent methods throughout history, including the Grammar Translation Method, Direct Method, Audiolingual Method, Cognitive Code Learning, designer methods of the 1970s like Community Language Learning and Suggestopedia, as well as the Silent Way, Total Physical Response, and Krashen's theories. It concludes with a discussion of the "post-method era" and debates around the concept of methods.
3. Approach
a well informed set of assumptions and beliefs
about the nature of teaching and learning
4. Method
a generalized set of rules that should be followed
when teaching language
primarily concerned with the teacher and the
students’ roles as opposed to subject-matter
objectives
5. Technique
specific activities manifested in the classroom
consistent with a method and therefore in
harmony with an approach as well
6. Curriculum/syllabus
a design for carrying out a particular language
program
consists of specification of linguistic and subject-
matter objectives, sequencing, and materials to
meet the needs of a designated group of learners
in a defined context
7. Methodology
a theoretical framework
pedagogical practices in general and
considerations involved in “how to teach”
based on an epistemological stance (how do we
learn)
9. The Grammar Translation
Method
Vocabulary is taught in the form of lists or isolation
Long explanations of grammar rules
Readings of classical difficult texts
Grammatical analysis
Little or no attention to pronunciation
10. The Direct Method
Classroom instruction exclusively in
the target language
Grammar was taught inductively
(teacher is a facilitator)
New teaching points were taught
through modeling and practice
Both speech and listening
comprehension were taught
Correct pronunciation and
grammar were emphasized
11. The Audiolingual Method
New material is presented in dialogue form
Memorization
Set phrases
Drills
Tapes, language lab, visual aids
Successful responses immediately reinforced
12. Cognitive code learning
Deep structure of language
Chomsky LAD (language acquisition device)
Deductive
Conscious awareness of rules
Generative transformational grammar
13. “Designer” Methods of the
Spirited 1970s
Separation of ESL and linguistics as a field of study
Language acquisition studies based on language
learning inside and outside of the classroom
Innovative methods were conceived
14. Community Language
Learning
Language learning was visualized as a counseling
session
Rogers’s views on language learning
Avoids threatening environment
Deductive learning (when A then B, knowledge is
“transferred” from the teacher to the learner,
information according to established knowledge)
16. The Silent Way
Learning is facilitated by physical objects
Problem solving involving the material to be
learned
Rods to introduce vocabulary
Charts to introduce pronunciation models,
grammatical paradigms
17. Total Physical Response
Commands are given
Listening and acting
No verbal response is necessary
18. Krashen
Acquisition Learning Hypothesis
(learning vs. acquisition)
The Natural Order (grammatical rules
are learned in a predictable way)
The Monitor Hypothesis (checks and
monitor output of what has been
learned)
The Input Hypothesis (I + 1) a little
beyond the comprehension level
The Affective Filter Hypothesis
(motivation)
20. The Pull of Methods
Teachers want to believe that if they just do X
their students will learn language.
Students also want to believe that there is some
magic pill that if the teacher would just give it to
them, they would learn.
21. Positivist vs. critical
perspective
Postivist (or scientist) orientation:
empirical-analytic approach, claims
of objectivity, how we teach is based
on knowledge derived through
experimental research
Critical theory: all knowledge is social,
cultural, and political; produced in a
particular economic, historical
context; claims to knowledge
represent the interests of certain
individuals or groups
22. But…
Researchers still do not know exactly how we
learn a second language
Human learning can’t be reliably studied with
experimental research designs
So…we cannot produce the “magic bullet”!
23. Discussion
What is Prabhu’s problem with people saying “There is no
best method”?
What does Pennycook mean when her says that “all
education is political” and that “all knowledge is ‘interested’”
(p. 590)? Use the example of English education in Puerto
Rico (or language education in another context that you
know well) to illustrate his two claims.
What is Pennycook’s problem with the concept of Methos as
published by different scholars? (see pp. 599-606)
Pennycook argues that the concept of Method is patriarchal
(it imposes ideas developed by mostly male linguists on the
mostly female workforce of ESL teachers) and imperialistic (it
assumes that Methods, developed in the West, are the best
way to teach ESL across the world). Do you agree with
Pennycook? Why or why not?
What do you think is the relationship between method and
what teachers actually are doing (and have been doing) in
the classroom?
24. Prabhu
Best method varies from context to context
Still left with search to find the best method for a
particular context.
There is truth in every method
But which parts are true?
Objective method evaluation is impossible