Presented by Dave Munn - President & CEO, ITSMA at Paul Writer's Great Indian Marketing Summit - IT Edition, 1 Feb, 2013, Bangalore
webcast of the session available at http://www.24framesdigital.com/paulwriter/webcast/010213/in.asp
Excited to be presenting to you ITSMA’s new customer data. This is one of my favorite projects of the year because we learn so much about buyer behavior that directly impacts the decisions we make in marketing. Let me warn you! This is a presentation on the results form the ITSMA How Buyers Consume Information Survey. That means it contains lots of data. There are lots of words and numbers on the slides. I did this because I am a researcher and I want to take you with me on the journey from data to insight. I don’t want you to just accept the things I am telling you. I want you to see the data for yourselves so you can see were the insights come from. My hope is that you will see new things in the data and that this will be the beginning of a fun and productive dialog.
Most of you around the room already know about ITSMA, and indeed in signing up for this course you no doubt checked us out! We are a membership organisation .......
Before we jump into the data, let me tell you a bit more about the research. I am presenting the results from ITSMA’s annual survey with buyers of large complex technology solutions. We have been doing this survey every year since 1999. Gives us exceptional insight into changing buyer behavior. This data is hot off the press. We fielded the survey in September and October. 299 respondents across 4 countries. Screened to include only senior execs at large companies that are involved in the purchase of complex technology-base solutions--$500K or more. Over half the respondents VP and C-level. 67% are the decision makers with the final authority. Half the companies with > $1B in revenue. We analyzed the data seven different ways to glean insights. The research explored the different stages of the customer’s buying process and how they use information throughout the process. The research will answers questions such as:Buying Process Who is involved in the purchase decision?When and why do buyers want to interact with services providers, sales, and subject matter experts?Information ConsumptionHave changes in the way buyers consume content changed the way decisions are made?What kinds of content are buyers looking for?Which information vehicles are preferred and trusted? How are social media and mobile sources being used? Preparing for the Social BuyerWhat is the right marketing mix balance to reach both the traditional and social buyers?Survey to include IT, Business executives involved with the selection of solution providers
Customer insightUpdated marketing skillsMarketing and sales alignmentReal-time decision-making and execution
I believe many of you are familiar with ITSMA’s 2011 how Buyers Consume information Study. But for those of you who aren’t, let me catch you up really quickly. In 2011 we revealed some fairly shocking revelations about buyer behavior. First, we identified a new type of buyer—the B2B Social Buyer who has very different buying behavior. One of the most prominent differences between the B2B Social Buyer and the more traditional buyer is less reliance on peers during the purchase process and more reliance on social media networks and channels, and community in general. At the same time we saw a decline in conventional peer influence, we saw an increase in credibility of solution providers. We were really scratching our heads when we saw this data. What happened to those very skeptical customers who didn’t trust their vendors? How could the services providers be considered just as credible as peers?Last year when we analyzed the data, we were understandably nervous about the findings. Could this really be true? At first the buyer behavior changes just seemed too drastic to happen in one year. So we reviewed our sample, methodology, and analysis. We didn’t find any flaws. Rather we found an explanation and that explanation was the new, younger B2B Social Buyers. The social buyers were changing buyer behavior.In 2011 we had one data point that was a complete departure from what came before. Despite our confidence in the methodology and analysis, going into 2012, you might imagine we were nervous about what we ere going to find. Would the 2011 findings hold up?
So here we are in 2012 and we now have 2 data points! Two data points make a line. With a line, we have a validated trend! Yes, solution providers are more credible, and even more influential, than peers as SOURCES of INFORMATION—I stress sources of information because peers are still the best source for references, referrals and testimonials. And yes, we have confirmed the existence of the B2B Social Buyers who have very different buyer behavior.In ITSMA’s research we are seeing that buyers are changing and it is hard to keep up. In fact we see a lag between changing buyer behavior and markets’ perceptions which is then perpetuated in marketing budgets and programs. The result is that marketing efforts are not as effective as they could be.
And with the 2012 study we have also uncovered a new trend. Buyers are relying on sales at all stages of the buying process. That means sales is active from the epiphany stage where buyers are keeping up with industry and technology trends before they recognize a problem, opportunity or need right through to the loyalty stage where they are building an ongoing relationship with their solution providers.
A prediction market is a platform that collects and aggregates the knowledge and judgment of a large, diverse group around a specific event or concept for the purpose of making predictions. The predictions represent the aggregated knowledge of the group and quantify the probability of future outcomes. In some instances, prediction markets may also be referred to as a preference market.
Peers are no longer the #1 source of information during the early stages of the buying process—solution providers are! They used to be a few years ago.
Social media is still not considered very credible. People are using it mostly to keep up and stay abreast of what’s happening in the industry but they still want strong proof points
A prediction market is a platform that collects and aggregates the knowledge and judgment of a large, diverse group around a specific event or concept for the purpose of making predictions. The predictions represent the aggregated knowledge of the group and quantify the probability of future outcomes. In some instances, prediction markets may also be referred to as a preference market.
Another Accenture example – appealing to traditional buyers - is their commitment to airport advertising. Teresa Poggenpohl has been in the news lately telling how important that is still to their audience.
A prediction market is a platform that collects and aggregates the knowledge and judgment of a large, diverse group around a specific event or concept for the purpose of making predictions. The predictions represent the aggregated knowledge of the group and quantify the probability of future outcomes. In some instances, prediction markets may also be referred to as a preference market.
Last year in our research we discovered that the market has divided into two groups: The B2B social Buyers and the traditional Buyers. Who are the B2B social buyers? They are the buyers who use social media channels and networks during the purchase process. About 90% of the buyers we survey use social media during the purchase process, but we don’t consider every user of social media social buyer. We asked the respondents in the survey about the usefulness of social media during the buying process. So while 90% use social media during the buying process, 46% find it useful or very useful. About half the study sample is social buyers. How do they behave differently than the more traditional buyer? I analyzed the data to compare these social buyers to the people who answered this question 1, 2, or 3. So Who are these social buyers? Note: in 2011, 74% of the sample were social buyers. Country differences. (no India, Australia, Brazil)
Last year, age was the single identifying characteristic of the B2b Social Buyer. This year we are seeing a more complete picture emerge. It is no longer solely a generational divide. Yes, B2b social Buyers tend to be younger. But they are also senior decision makers who are more likely to be in an IT role.And as you will see as we look at the data, the there is a trend for the traditional buyers to become more social.
All buyers today have robust appetites for information. They spend a lot of time on and offline researching and learning about technology and their industries. They are looking for new ideas and ways to create competitive advantage. They are trying to understand what the should be doing now, and how they need to prepare for the future. We call this the Epiphany Stage of the buying process.We asked what is the average number of hours you spend each week keeping up with the industry and/or technology. The average for all 299 respondents was 5.4 hours. However, the B2B Social Buyers spend significantly more time consuming content. An average of 6.5 hours per week compared to 4.3 hours for the traditional buyers.So while both groups are consuming a lot of information, the social buyers are consuming significantly more.
Here’s some interesting data.The top charts show the percentage of time that the B2B Social Buyers and traditional buyers spend consuming information on and offline. The bottom shows the percentage of the time spent online accessing information from either a PC or a mobile device.There is no difference in the amount of time buyers spend online by social media use. Even the traditional buyers are spending nearly 2/3 of their time accessing information online.However, we do see a significant difference when it comes to accessing information via a mobile device. B2B Social buyers are more likely to be consuming information from a smart phone or tablet. In fact, they are spending about 1/3 of the time consuming information—as part of the buying process—on a mobile device. Making sure your content is optimized for mobile access is no longer optional. It is a necessity!
This is a variation of the question we first started asking about 10 years ago that was our first sign of what back then we called the New Buyer Reality. The NBR coincided with the rise of the Internet as a source of information and this created a fundamental shift in power from the seller to the buyer. We asked when you have a business problem that requires a technology solution, what percentage of the time do you initiate the research and fine the appropriate solution providers vs. they contact you first? Over the years we consistently saw and continue to see that about 70% of the time buyers are finding their own solution providers rather that waiting to be contacted. They were self directed, self reliant, doing their own research. They proactively buy. They aren't “sold.”This year we asked the question a little differently to find out who actually does the research, you or your staff. And what we found is that the social buyers are more hand on, doing their own research. They are less likely to be delegating. (no difference by title, but IT job role also do own research)
This slide shows a summary of both information sources and delivery vehicles and is helpful to see the kinds of things that both social and traditional buyers use and prefer such as xxxxxx. Then we show where there are differences – the B2B social buyer prefers xxxx and the Traditional Buyer prefers yyyy.We’ve seen a number of companies who have taken a much more outside in approach to understand how their customers and prospects want to consume information from them and what their preferred vehicles are to consume it. This has helped them readjust their spend. One company that has done more than just incremental change is Cognizant. They’ve decided to stop interruption marketing in physical places and focus on permission marketing or content marketing in virtual places. With a limited marketing budget it was a decision to be focused and efficient. They realize there are only a few thousand people they really want to reach not hundreds of thousands, so airport ads, WSJ ads aren’t for them. They made the decision to own the online experience. They've taken this integrated approach through Twitter, through Facebook, LinkedIn YouTube, and the usual places like HBR online, online business media, to leverage their content around the Future of Work. It's very targeted marketing, content-based permission virtual as opposed to some all the traditional approaches. Their web traffic, click throughs have been excellent….and their Alexa score has improved dramatically. Alexa provides traffic data, global rankings and other information on 30 million websites, and is a subsidiary of Amazon. Ok let me turn things back to Julie to discuss the third mandate.
In the age of instant and free information, talking to a salesperson is often seen as unnecessary.“Research has shown that B2B buyers self-educate during close to 70% of their buying experience, invalidating the process salespeople have relied on in the past to build relationships from the start.” – Ardath Albee, CEO, Marketing Interactions, Inc.Are buyers waiting till they have their short list to talk to sales people?I have a new 70%. 70% of Buyers want to engage with sales people BEFORE they select their short list. Not different for providers have existing relationship and new providersSales enablement is as important as ever.
XxxxyyyySales reps are not obsolete! Buyers do rely on sales during the early stages of the buying process. Not sure if you remember if but there was a slide I showed earlier. When asked the question: What were the first three sources of information you turned to when you began your solution research? They cited websites, SME’s, web search, then sales reps.
Interestingly, the B2B social buyers see more value in interacting with sales reps than traditional buyers do, especially in an advisory role
BT example: This is an example of one of the most innovative ways to implement ABM that we have seen. The KAM Live is so innovative, it won the ITSMA MEA for 2010. KAM Live provides real-time news, data, and compelling insight to the account managers of 120 of BT’s top multinational accounts every 24 hours—helping them to better understand and serve their customers. What BT has succeeded in doing is using automation to cost effectively develop deep knowledge about their top accounts to support their ABM efforts. In doing so they are able to expand the scope of their ABM marketing program to many more accounts. That means that marketing and account managers have the information and tools they need to spark epiphanies and move their most important clients from satisfaction to loyalty to trust. (Done . All the other stuff is good info, but does nothing to support our key message. We can leave it out.)
Your websites are the #1 source of information early in the buying processB2B social buyers and traditional buyers do consume information differently—you have to have something for both audiencesBuyer behavior is rapidly changing and you need to keep up!