SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 13
Objective Determination of Minimum
 Engine M
 E i    Mapping Requirements for
              i  R    i      t f
Optimal SI DIVCP Engine Calibration


           Pete Maloney
        The MathWorks, Inc.
                      ,
Topics
Problem Definition

Results Summary
               y

Problem Solving Approach
Problem-Solving

Conclusions and Next Steps

                      2       2009-01-0246
Problem Definition




Determine Minimum Number of Spark-Sweep
 Test-Points Required For Optimal Calibration
                    3                2009-01-0246
Results Summary
                                          Torque Residuals as a function of DoE Size
                        3


                        2


                        1


                        0
           duals (Nm)




                        -1
Torque Resid




                        -2                                                                         Median
                                                                                                   M di
                                                                                                   Max
                                                                                                   Min
                        -3


                        -4


                        -5


                        -6


                        -7
                         50   100   150       200           250             300        350   400            450
                                                    Number of DoE Points

•Approximately 100 Spark-Sweeps Required to Optimally Calibrate This
Type of Engine With a Workload Feasible 2 Stage Modeling Approach
                      Workload-Feasible 2-Stage

                                                                  4                                               2009-01-0246
Problem-Solving Approach




          5            2009-01-0246
Problem-Solving Approach

         52 Pt. Sobol Survey Test Design




           6                    2009-01-0246
Problem-Solving Approach
         5th Sobol Augmentation Design
                    (406 Pts)




          7                    2009-01-0246
Problem-Solving Approach
       2-Stage Model Definition




Local Model             Global Model
                8                 2009-01-0246
Problem-Solving Approach
        Optimal Calibrations From 52 Pt. Survey DoE
         p                                    y




Optimal Calibrations From Final Augmentation: 406 Pt. DoE 5




                          9                        2009-01-0246
Problem-Solving Approach
  Exhaustive Calibration Development DoE

                               100 Cam-Phaser
                               Combinations at Each
                               of 100 Calibration Table
                               Breakpoints in Speed/Load

                               (10,000
                               (10 000 Spark Sweeps)




                 10                        2009-01-0246
Problem-Solving Approach
         Optimal Calibrations From Exhaustive DoE
          p




Optimal Calibrations From Final Augmentation: 406 Pt. DoE 5




                          11                        2009-01-0246
Problem-Solving Approach
                DoE Augmentation 5 Calibration vs Baseline Exhaustive Calibration
                      g
                                       Spark Advance Residuals (DegBTDC)                                                           Intake Phaser Advance Residuals (DegCrank)                                                     Exhaust Phaser Retard Residuals (DegCrank)
            0.9                                                                                 10                  0.9                                                                          10               0.9                                                                         10


                                                                                                8                                                                                                8                                                                                            8
            0.8                                                                                                     0.8                                                                                           0.8

                                                                                                6                                                                                                6                                                                                            6
            0.7                                                                                                     0.7                                                                                           0.7
                                                                                                4                                                                                                4                                                                                            4

            0.6                                                                                                     0.6                                                                                           0.6
                                                                                                2                                                                                                2                                                                                            2




                                                                                                            %)




                                                                                                                                                                                                             %)
Load (% )




                                                                                                      Load (%




                                                                                                                                                                                                       Load (%
            0.5                                                                                 0                   0.5                                                                          0                0.5                                                                         0

                                                                                                -2                                                                                               -2                                                                                           -2
            0.4                                                                                                     0.4                                                                                           0.4

                                                                                                -4                                                                                               -4                                                                                           -4
            0.3                                                                                                     0.3                                                                                           0.3
                                                                                                -6                                                                                               -6                                                                                           -6

            0.2                                                                                                     0.2                                                                                           0.2
                                                                                                -8                                                                                               -8                                                                                           -8

            0.1
            01                                                                                  -10
                                                                                                 10                 0.1
                                                                                                                    01                                                                           -10
                                                                                                                                                                                                  10              0.1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  01                                                                          -10
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               10
              500       1000    1500     2000      2500    3000    3500    4000   4500   5000                         500   1000   1500   2000    2500    3000    3500      4000   4500   5000                      500   1000   1500   2000     2500    3000     3500   4000   4500   5000
                                                   Speed (RPM)                                                                                    Speed (RPM)                                                                                    Speed (RPM)




                                                Torque Residuals (Nm)                                                                     Residual Fraction Residuals (%)                                                                 Torque Prediction Error (Nm)
                0.9                                                                             2                   0.9                                                                          5                0.9                                                                         10

                                                                                                1                                                                                                4.5
                                                                                                                                                                                                 45                                                                                           8
                0.8                                                                                                 0.8                                                                                           0.8
                                                                                                0                                                                                                4                                                                                            6
                0.7                                                                                                 0.7                                                                                           0.7
                                                                                                -1                                                                                               3.5                                                                                          4
                0.6                                                                                                 0.6                                                                                           0.6
                                                                                                -2                                                                                               3                                                                                            2
     Load (%)




                                                                                                         Load (%)




                                                                                                                                                                                                       Load (%)
                0.5                                                                             -3                  0.5                                                                          2.5              0.5                                                                         0

                                                                                                -4                                                                                               2                                                                                            -2
                0.4                                                                                                 0.4                                                                                           0.4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  04
                                                                                                -5                                                                                               1.5                                                                                          -4
                0.3                                                                                                 0.3                                                                                           0.3
                                                                                                -6                                                                                               1                                                                                            -6
                0.2                                                                                                 0.2                                                                                           0.2
                                                                                                -7                                                                                               0.5                                                                                          -8

                0.1                                                                             -8                  0.1                                                                          0                0.1                                                                         -10
                  500    1000   1500      2000      2500    3000    3500   4000   4500   5000                         500   1000   1500    2000   2500    3000     3500     4000   4500   5000                      500   1000   1500   2000     2500    3000     3500   4000   4500   5000
                                                    Speed (RPM)                                                                                   Speed (RPM)                                                                                    Speed (RPM)


                      •Engine Model Re-Tested At DoE 5 and Exhaustive Calibraiton Table Breakpoints

                                                                                                                                             12                                                                                                          2009-01-0246
Conclusions And Next Steps
•~100 Spark Sweeps Required For DIVCP Calibration

•VCP Calibration Shapes Can Vary But Yield Similar Results

•VCP Calibration Shapes Sensitive to Modeling Process

•Sparser Version of Exhaustive Process Should Be Tried




                         13                    2009-01-0246

Más contenido relacionado

Destacado

Engine Mapping And Calibration USA
Engine Mapping And Calibration USAEngine Mapping And Calibration USA
Engine Mapping And Calibration USABrian Trimboli
 
Thematic_Mapping_Engine
Thematic_Mapping_EngineThematic_Mapping_Engine
Thematic_Mapping_Enginetutorialsruby
 
Internal combustion engine (ja304) chapter 4
Internal combustion engine (ja304) chapter 4Internal combustion engine (ja304) chapter 4
Internal combustion engine (ja304) chapter 4mechanical86
 
Testing and performance of IC engine
Testing and performance of IC engineTesting and performance of IC engine
Testing and performance of IC engineMustafa Bzu
 
i c engines efficiencies
i c engines efficienciesi c engines efficiencies
i c engines efficienciesmp poonia
 
How to calculate your Fuel Consumption (FC)
How to calculate your Fuel Consumption (FC)How to calculate your Fuel Consumption (FC)
How to calculate your Fuel Consumption (FC)funkseoul
 
Automatic manual transmission
Automatic manual transmissionAutomatic manual transmission
Automatic manual transmissionManish Dhiman
 
James watt and the steam engine
James watt and the steam engineJames watt and the steam engine
James watt and the steam engineLindyM
 
An Overview of Vehicle Control Systems
An Overview of Vehicle Control SystemsAn Overview of Vehicle Control Systems
An Overview of Vehicle Control SystemsBehzad Samadi
 
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERSINTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERSPEC University Chandigarh
 
AUTOMATED MANUAL TRANSMISSION
AUTOMATED MANUAL TRANSMISSIONAUTOMATED MANUAL TRANSMISSION
AUTOMATED MANUAL TRANSMISSIONpgayatrinaidu
 
Ppt automobile
Ppt automobile  Ppt automobile
Ppt automobile suhas kale
 
Gearless transmission system
Gearless transmission systemGearless transmission system
Gearless transmission systemAkash Maurya
 
Condenser in thermal power plants
Condenser in thermal power plantsCondenser in thermal power plants
Condenser in thermal power plantsSHIVAJI CHOUDHURY
 

Destacado (20)

Engine Mapping And Calibration USA
Engine Mapping And Calibration USAEngine Mapping And Calibration USA
Engine Mapping And Calibration USA
 
Thematic_Mapping_Engine
Thematic_Mapping_EngineThematic_Mapping_Engine
Thematic_Mapping_Engine
 
Internal combustion engine (ja304) chapter 4
Internal combustion engine (ja304) chapter 4Internal combustion engine (ja304) chapter 4
Internal combustion engine (ja304) chapter 4
 
Testing and performance of IC engine
Testing and performance of IC engineTesting and performance of IC engine
Testing and performance of IC engine
 
i c engines efficiencies
i c engines efficienciesi c engines efficiencies
i c engines efficiencies
 
How to calculate your Fuel Consumption (FC)
How to calculate your Fuel Consumption (FC)How to calculate your Fuel Consumption (FC)
How to calculate your Fuel Consumption (FC)
 
final project
final projectfinal project
final project
 
Icengines testing
Icengines testingIcengines testing
Icengines testing
 
CONDENSERS & COOLING TOWERS
CONDENSERS & COOLING TOWERSCONDENSERS & COOLING TOWERS
CONDENSERS & COOLING TOWERS
 
Gearless drive report 2014 lst
Gearless drive report 2014 lstGearless drive report 2014 lst
Gearless drive report 2014 lst
 
Automatic manual transmission
Automatic manual transmissionAutomatic manual transmission
Automatic manual transmission
 
James watt and the steam engine
James watt and the steam engineJames watt and the steam engine
James watt and the steam engine
 
JA304 chapter 1
JA304 chapter 1JA304 chapter 1
JA304 chapter 1
 
An Overview of Vehicle Control Systems
An Overview of Vehicle Control SystemsAn Overview of Vehicle Control Systems
An Overview of Vehicle Control Systems
 
Performance parameters
Performance parametersPerformance parameters
Performance parameters
 
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERSINTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS
 
AUTOMATED MANUAL TRANSMISSION
AUTOMATED MANUAL TRANSMISSIONAUTOMATED MANUAL TRANSMISSION
AUTOMATED MANUAL TRANSMISSION
 
Ppt automobile
Ppt automobile  Ppt automobile
Ppt automobile
 
Gearless transmission system
Gearless transmission systemGearless transmission system
Gearless transmission system
 
Condenser in thermal power plants
Condenser in thermal power plantsCondenser in thermal power plants
Condenser in thermal power plants
 

Similar a Objective Determination Of Minimum Engine Mapping Requirements For Optimal SI DIVCP Engine Calibration

ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdfST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdfgrssieee
 
Wikimedia Conference 2009 presentation
Wikimedia Conference 2009 presentationWikimedia Conference 2009 presentation
Wikimedia Conference 2009 presentationYu Suzuki
 
Ispra 2007 luis martín2
Ispra 2007 luis martín2Ispra 2007 luis martín2
Ispra 2007 luis martín2IrSOLaV Pomares
 
Why we don’t know how many colors there are
Why we don’t know how many colors there areWhy we don’t know how many colors there are
Why we don’t know how many colors there areJan Morovic
 
Polar lidar project presentation
Polar lidar project presentationPolar lidar project presentation
Polar lidar project presentationAleksey_Bunkin
 
adc converter basics
adc converter basicsadc converter basics
adc converter basicshacker1500
 
Towards Probabilistic Assessment of Modularity
Towards Probabilistic Assessment of ModularityTowards Probabilistic Assessment of Modularity
Towards Probabilistic Assessment of ModularityKevin Hoffman
 
Benson-ASRANET2012
Benson-ASRANET2012Benson-ASRANET2012
Benson-ASRANET2012Simon Benson
 
Fluke 810-vibration-tester
Fluke 810-vibration-testerFluke 810-vibration-tester
Fluke 810-vibration-testerMithila6190
 
Machine learning projects with r
Machine learning projects with rMachine learning projects with r
Machine learning projects with rliyiou
 
Machine Learning for Speech
Machine Learning for Speech Machine Learning for Speech
Machine Learning for Speech butest
 
Wikipedia ws
Wikipedia wsWikipedia ws
Wikipedia wsYu Suzuki
 
Simple asynchronous remote invocations for distributed real-time Java
Simple asynchronous remote invocations for distributed real-time JavaSimple asynchronous remote invocations for distributed real-time Java
Simple asynchronous remote invocations for distributed real-time JavaUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid
 
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings CallLinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings CallLinkedIn
 

Similar a Objective Determination Of Minimum Engine Mapping Requirements For Optimal SI DIVCP Engine Calibration (20)

ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdfST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
 
9th ICCS Noordwijkerhout
9th ICCS Noordwijkerhout9th ICCS Noordwijkerhout
9th ICCS Noordwijkerhout
 
Wikimedia Conference 2009 presentation
Wikimedia Conference 2009 presentationWikimedia Conference 2009 presentation
Wikimedia Conference 2009 presentation
 
PyPy: Dynamic Language Compilation Framework
PyPy: Dynamic Language Compilation FrameworkPyPy: Dynamic Language Compilation Framework
PyPy: Dynamic Language Compilation Framework
 
Ispra 2007 luis martín2
Ispra 2007 luis martín2Ispra 2007 luis martín2
Ispra 2007 luis martín2
 
Why we don’t know how many colors there are
Why we don’t know how many colors there areWhy we don’t know how many colors there are
Why we don’t know how many colors there are
 
Polar lidar project presentation
Polar lidar project presentationPolar lidar project presentation
Polar lidar project presentation
 
adc converter basics
adc converter basicsadc converter basics
adc converter basics
 
Towards Probabilistic Assessment of Modularity
Towards Probabilistic Assessment of ModularityTowards Probabilistic Assessment of Modularity
Towards Probabilistic Assessment of Modularity
 
Benson-ASRANET2012
Benson-ASRANET2012Benson-ASRANET2012
Benson-ASRANET2012
 
DCT_TR802
DCT_TR802DCT_TR802
DCT_TR802
 
DCT_TR802
DCT_TR802DCT_TR802
DCT_TR802
 
Modeling & Simulation
Modeling & SimulationModeling & Simulation
Modeling & Simulation
 
Fluke 810-vibration-tester
Fluke 810-vibration-testerFluke 810-vibration-tester
Fluke 810-vibration-tester
 
Machine learning projects with r
Machine learning projects with rMachine learning projects with r
Machine learning projects with r
 
Machine Learning for Speech
Machine Learning for Speech Machine Learning for Speech
Machine Learning for Speech
 
Wikipedia ws
Wikipedia wsWikipedia ws
Wikipedia ws
 
Simple asynchronous remote invocations for distributed real-time Java
Simple asynchronous remote invocations for distributed real-time JavaSimple asynchronous remote invocations for distributed real-time Java
Simple asynchronous remote invocations for distributed real-time Java
 
Student Presentation- ISU
Student Presentation- ISUStudent Presentation- ISU
Student Presentation- ISU
 
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings CallLinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
 

Más de pmaloney1

Affliations, Patents, and Publications
Affliations, Patents, and PublicationsAffliations, Patents, and Publications
Affliations, Patents, and Publicationspmaloney1
 
Pneumatic State Estimator
Pneumatic State EstimatorPneumatic State Estimator
Pneumatic State Estimatorpmaloney1
 
Wide Range AFR Control
Wide Range AFR ControlWide Range AFR Control
Wide Range AFR Controlpmaloney1
 
Diesel Engine Calibration
Diesel Engine CalibrationDiesel Engine Calibration
Diesel Engine Calibrationpmaloney1
 
Spark Ignition Engine Calibration
Spark Ignition Engine CalibrationSpark Ignition Engine Calibration
Spark Ignition Engine Calibrationpmaloney1
 
Engine Calibration - General
Engine Calibration - GeneralEngine Calibration - General
Engine Calibration - Generalpmaloney1
 

Más de pmaloney1 (6)

Affliations, Patents, and Publications
Affliations, Patents, and PublicationsAffliations, Patents, and Publications
Affliations, Patents, and Publications
 
Pneumatic State Estimator
Pneumatic State EstimatorPneumatic State Estimator
Pneumatic State Estimator
 
Wide Range AFR Control
Wide Range AFR ControlWide Range AFR Control
Wide Range AFR Control
 
Diesel Engine Calibration
Diesel Engine CalibrationDiesel Engine Calibration
Diesel Engine Calibration
 
Spark Ignition Engine Calibration
Spark Ignition Engine CalibrationSpark Ignition Engine Calibration
Spark Ignition Engine Calibration
 
Engine Calibration - General
Engine Calibration - GeneralEngine Calibration - General
Engine Calibration - General
 

Objective Determination Of Minimum Engine Mapping Requirements For Optimal SI DIVCP Engine Calibration

  • 1. Objective Determination of Minimum Engine M E i Mapping Requirements for i R i t f Optimal SI DIVCP Engine Calibration Pete Maloney The MathWorks, Inc. ,
  • 2. Topics Problem Definition Results Summary y Problem Solving Approach Problem-Solving Conclusions and Next Steps 2 2009-01-0246
  • 3. Problem Definition Determine Minimum Number of Spark-Sweep Test-Points Required For Optimal Calibration 3 2009-01-0246
  • 4. Results Summary Torque Residuals as a function of DoE Size 3 2 1 0 duals (Nm) -1 Torque Resid -2 Median M di Max Min -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Number of DoE Points •Approximately 100 Spark-Sweeps Required to Optimally Calibrate This Type of Engine With a Workload Feasible 2 Stage Modeling Approach Workload-Feasible 2-Stage 4 2009-01-0246
  • 5. Problem-Solving Approach 5 2009-01-0246
  • 6. Problem-Solving Approach 52 Pt. Sobol Survey Test Design 6 2009-01-0246
  • 7. Problem-Solving Approach 5th Sobol Augmentation Design (406 Pts) 7 2009-01-0246
  • 8. Problem-Solving Approach 2-Stage Model Definition Local Model Global Model 8 2009-01-0246
  • 9. Problem-Solving Approach Optimal Calibrations From 52 Pt. Survey DoE p y Optimal Calibrations From Final Augmentation: 406 Pt. DoE 5 9 2009-01-0246
  • 10. Problem-Solving Approach Exhaustive Calibration Development DoE 100 Cam-Phaser Combinations at Each of 100 Calibration Table Breakpoints in Speed/Load (10,000 (10 000 Spark Sweeps) 10 2009-01-0246
  • 11. Problem-Solving Approach Optimal Calibrations From Exhaustive DoE p Optimal Calibrations From Final Augmentation: 406 Pt. DoE 5 11 2009-01-0246
  • 12. Problem-Solving Approach DoE Augmentation 5 Calibration vs Baseline Exhaustive Calibration g Spark Advance Residuals (DegBTDC) Intake Phaser Advance Residuals (DegCrank) Exhaust Phaser Retard Residuals (DegCrank) 0.9 10 0.9 10 0.9 10 8 8 8 0.8 0.8 0.8 6 6 6 0.7 0.7 0.7 4 4 4 0.6 0.6 0.6 2 2 2 %) %) Load (% ) Load (% Load (% 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 -2 -2 -2 0.4 0.4 0.4 -4 -4 -4 0.3 0.3 0.3 -6 -6 -6 0.2 0.2 0.2 -8 -8 -8 0.1 01 -10 10 0.1 01 -10 10 0.1 01 -10 10 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Speed (RPM) Speed (RPM) Speed (RPM) Torque Residuals (Nm) Residual Fraction Residuals (%) Torque Prediction Error (Nm) 0.9 2 0.9 5 0.9 10 1 4.5 45 8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0 4 6 0.7 0.7 0.7 -1 3.5 4 0.6 0.6 0.6 -2 3 2 Load (%) Load (%) Load (%) 0.5 -3 0.5 2.5 0.5 0 -4 2 -2 0.4 0.4 0.4 04 -5 1.5 -4 0.3 0.3 0.3 -6 1 -6 0.2 0.2 0.2 -7 0.5 -8 0.1 -8 0.1 0 0.1 -10 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Speed (RPM) Speed (RPM) Speed (RPM) •Engine Model Re-Tested At DoE 5 and Exhaustive Calibraiton Table Breakpoints 12 2009-01-0246
  • 13. Conclusions And Next Steps •~100 Spark Sweeps Required For DIVCP Calibration •VCP Calibration Shapes Can Vary But Yield Similar Results •VCP Calibration Shapes Sensitive to Modeling Process •Sparser Version of Exhaustive Process Should Be Tried 13 2009-01-0246