The document discusses Creative Commons licensing and how it allows people to freely use images as long as they follow the creator's guidelines. It explains that Flickr has large collections of images available under Creative Commons licenses. However, other sites like Smugmug do not always clearly indicate copyright information. The document provides tips for searching images with Creative Commons licenses on sites like Smugmug and guidelines for properly using images from the internet.
2. Creative Commons
Used to denote pictures
that are free to use as
long as you meet the
creators idea of what
and end user can do
with the picture
Fairly common in use,
many free picture image
searches available
3. Flickr and CC
Flickr has whole
gallery sets based on
the use of Creative
Commons
This allows people
who want to use
pictures on web sites,
in movies, in media
(flash, interactive) to
use imagery from
others, as long as the
CC license is
followed
4. Other sites it is
not so clear
Other sites like
Smugmug do not
explicitly state the
photographers (or
media’s) copyright.
Some will put their
copyright in the
search engine data
(SEO) so that you
can tell if they are
full copyright or
some form of
creative commons
5. You can search on
creative commons
creative commons
smugmug.com is a
good Google search
to find images that
have a creative
commons license.
You should also
follow any other
directions of the
photographer if you
are using their work
6. This is focused on Washington State, your states laws
will vary, sometimes widely.
Right to publicity
Right of performance
Model release(s)
Public VS Private photography
Law Enforcement
7. http://rightofpublicity.com/statutes/washington
All artists have a right to publicity:
If the photographer did not have a release and took a
picture of an artist the artist can request to have it taken
down
If the picture has been downloaded and copied the
photographer could be at fault
If the picture is hosted locally on someone else’s web server
and used on a separate web site – the web site operator can be
at fault
Penalties can be steep, up to 1500 dollars per image or
occurrence
8. http://rightofpublicity.com/statutes/washington
If the venue where a public/private performance did
not get a performance release, any imagery of the
performers can not be used without permission by the
venue, the photographer, or other parties
Artists can sue, and win if the venue did not have a right
of performance release
Using an image off the internet does not imply that the
proper legal forms were used
Right of publicity and/or performance might not have
been granted
9. First Amendment
Parody or Satire
Right of performance or model released obtained after
the pictures or video were taken
Signs in the venue that explicitly state that
photography is going to happen and that the people in
the venue waive all rights based on being there
Contract as part of ticket sales about photography
happening in the venue and waiver of rights
10. Some photographers do not or are not able to obtain a
full model release
In that case, all pictures of that model can become
encumbered if there is a dispute between the model and
the photographer
Copying a picture of a model can result in secondary
liability to the web site serving the picture of that model
Model Releases not in a full legal name
Some photographers grab a release in the model’s stage
name
Those are not always enforceable
11. Centers on the argument of “expectation of privacy”
Taking pictures of people on a street corner is ok
Taking pictures of people through their bedroom
window is not ok (even if the curtains are open)
Selfies – are ok as long as they are of age
Police, Fire, Emergency Services are ok – as long as you
are not in the way – and you obey requests to stay away
and not be in the way
Federal buildings, power plants, ship yards not ok – will
cite terrorism act
Riots, protests, marches are all ok – but if someone asks
you to stay out of the way – you should do so
12. Public Private
problems
A picture of a rioter
Clearly identifiable
people
Public space
Public event
Unknown Copyright
(where did this come
from?)
Can I use it?
13. All video, all pictures come “encumbered” with some form
of license
Even Instagram comes encumbered:
You represent and warrant that: (i) you own the Content posted by
you on or through the Service or otherwise have the right to grant
the rights and licenses set forth in these Terms of Use; (ii) the
posting and use of your Content on or through the Service does not
violate, misappropriate or infringe on the rights of any third party,
including, without limitation, privacy rights, publicity rights,
copyrights, trademark and/or other intellectual property rights; (iii)
you agree to pay for all royalties, fees, and any other monies owed by
reason of Content you post on or through the Service; and (iv) you
have the legal right and capacity to enter into these Terms of Use in
your jurisdiction. http://instagram.com/legal/terms/
14. You might not know about any rights that were obtained
with that picture
Some concert footage can be taken down at the source, but
your copy could result in a separate take down
You might be unaware of any releases that were obtained
from the subject
You might be unaware of any litigation around the
photograph or video causing you to get swept up in a lawsuit
You might be unaware of any terms of service the picture
violates (Selfies included)
You might not be informed if a picture is taken down later
opening your web site to a lawsuit for reposting
15. Contact the photographer
Ask if you can use the picture for your web site
Most photographers are ok with this if you ask, I have never
said no to anyone who asked
Purchase a license for the picture
This is often expensive, the costs range from dollars to
hundreds of dollars
Search Flickr’s Creative Commons or Smugmug’s
Creative Commons to pull pictures that are open to use
Always credit the photographer/videographer – you don’t
need to ask if you stick to CC pictures