SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 44
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Automotive




Momentum: KPMG’s Global
Auto Executive Survey 2009
Industry concerns and expectations 2009-2013



kpmg internAtionAl
KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009




Contents –
Foreword                                               01
Survey methodology                                     02
Executive summary                                      04
Introduction                                           06
Oil prices and the KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey   07
  1/ Auto-making in crisis                             08
  2/ New markets                                       22
  3/ Technology and innovation                         26
  4/ Beyond crisis: challenges and opportunities       34
Conclusion                                             40
Foreword 1




Foreword –

KPMG’s Global Auto Executive Survey
2009 coincided with the unfolding of an
unprecedented global economic crisis with
profound implications for the automotive
industry. The expectations recorded in
this survey reflect the depth of the crisis.




The cautious optimism evident among               It is clear that the near future is going to be     These are difficult times. Yet the KPMG
automotive decision-makers in 2007 is             very tough for the automotive industry. Yet         Global Auto Executive Survey shows that
gone. In the last quarter of 2008, companies      the KPMG Survey also shows that long-term           many companies are well aware of the
expect lower revenues, lower profits,             concerns have not greatly changed. When             challenges they face – and that many are
more bankruptcies, and a long cycle of            asked about long-term trends, opportunities         ready to build on their strengths as they
restructuring to come. They see more              and challenges, companies continue to say           face those challenges.
overcapacity emerging, and they believe           they retain a long-term focus on innovation
investment will slow.                             and technology – particularly fuel technologies.

These lowered expectations are not confined       The 2009 Survey suggests that innovation
to the mature automotive economies. In China      and technology are likely to be at the heart
and India too – economies where growth is         of industry efforts to recapture profitability in
still high – companies believe that production    the coming months and years. For example,
and sales in the coming five years will be        innovation – especially process innovation –
considerably lower than previously anticipated.   is still seen by companies as the best way
                                                  to cut costs, rather than attacking direct
A sharp lowering of expectations is hardly        overheads. Companies also believe that
surprising, given the extent of the current       product innovation will be key to rebuilding
                                                                                                      Uwe Achterholt
downturn and its impact on auto sales. What       sales: it is notable that despite the fall in
                                                                                                      Global Chair, Automotive
is surprising can be found in the detail. For     energy costs during the last few months,
                                                                                                      KPMG in Germany
example, the KPMG Survey shows that many          expectations of sales of hybrid and other
automotive companies saw today’s crisis           fuel-efficient vehicles continue to rise
coming: our historical comparisons show           sharply compared with previous years.
that concerns over the global economy have
actually been rising for the last three years.    And in the midst of pessimism, companies
                                                  also tell us about success. They say that
                                                  effective management will be the key to
                                                  success. They do not believe that it is
                                                  marketing or brand power that will pull them
                                                  out of recession, but the leveraging of
                                                  technology and meeting customer needs.
2 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009




Survey methodology –

The KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey
2009 is the tenth consecutive annual survey
of senior global auto executives carried out
by KPMG firms. This year the survey is more
extensive than in previous years: 200
respondents took part in the survey between
September 22 and October 31 2008, including
companies in the Americas, Asia Pacific,
Europe, Africa and the Middle East.
Survey methodology 3




Survey participants                                                                                   Source:
                                                                                                      KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

by job title                                                                                          Key
                                                                                                            managers and senior managers
                                                                                                            Directors
                                                                                                            Head of department
                                                                         2%                                 ‘C’ level executives
                                                                  7%
                                                                                                            others
                                                             5%                                             vice president
                                                                                                            president
                                                        6%
                                                                                            39%




                                                     17%




                                                                         26%




Survey participants                                                                                   Source:
                                                                                                      KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

by company type                                                                                       Key
                                                                                                            vehicle manufacturers
                                                                                                            tier 1 supplier
                                                                  14%                                       tier 2 supplier




                                                                                              41%




                                                           46%




Each year we ask executives to describe              A small number of questions in the survey
themselves and their companies. Although             were asked of companies in the U.S. but not
we look for a balanced mix of auto-makers            of companies in other countries (these were
and suppliers, this year* no respondents             questions relating to U.S. restructuring plans
chose to describe themselves as Tier 3               and progress). Where these results are cited
suppliers, although in previous years the            in the survey, they are also flagged as ‘U.S.
survey did include responses from Tier 3             only’ results.
suppliers. In order to present results that are
comparable with previous years, we have
therefore grouped Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers
together. This year’s results from Tier 2
suppliers are therefore compared with the
previous two-year results from a
combination of Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers.

* Research took place in the last quarter of 2008.
  Report published in early 2009.
4 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009




Executive summary –

The mood has changed, and the
change has been very rapid




                                                                                                      Market share expectations continue
Only 12 months ago, companies were
beginning to express a cautious optimism
                                                  1/Auto-making in crisis                             to shift in favor of emerging Asian and
after several years of challenge. Companies                                                           mature Japanese and Korean brands
                                                  The 2009 KPMG Auto Executive Survey
saw a world where growth was strong,                                                                  • Chinese brands have moved from
                                                  makes it clear that the fundamental issues
and emerging market growth was                                                                          second to first place in market share
                                                  concerning auto-makers have been
unprecedented. They saw margins and                                                                     expectations, and Indian brands from
                                                  rebalanced, but the pattern of concern
profits beginning to be rebuilt, as a result                                                            fourth to second place.
                                                  remains unchanged.
of long-term restructuring and globalization
                                                                                                      • Expectations for U.S. auto-makers have
of manufacturing.
                                                  Key issues                                            declined further from a low level.
                                                  • Product quality remains the most cited issue.
Today, much of that optimism has been                                                                 • Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMA)
deferred, if not abandoned. In established        • The deterioration of the global economy             companies are markedly more optimistic
markets, sales are falling, investments are         has continued to rise as a concern.                 on market share expectation than
being reviewed, and some very large auto                                                                companies in the Americas or Asia
                                                  • Labor relations continue to fall in importance.
companies are close to insolvency.                                                                      Pacific (ASPAC).

                                                  Margins and profitability are expected
In emerging markets, prospects are being                                                              Auto industry assessments of levels of
                                                  to fall
scaled back far and fast, as consumer                                                                 overcapacity have shifted for the worse
                                                  • The great majority of companies surveyed
markets are hit by rapid credit contraction and                                                       • ASPAC companies are most likely to consider
                                                    think there will either be no growth in
a sudden slowdown in overall growth rates.                                                              that the industry has overcapacity, while
                                                    profits or that profits cannot be predicted
                                                                                                        companies in the Americas are least likely.
                                                    over the coming five years – and almost a
But auto-making is a long-term business with
                                                    quarter think profits will actually decline.
a long-term horizon, and long-term concerns                                                           Cost saving is a rising concern
have not changed. Automotive companies            • Captive finance company profits are               • Innovation (in manufacturing processes and
remain concerned with innovation and the            expected to decline sharply.                        materials technology) is more important
leveraging of technology into products that                                                             than direct overhead cost reductions.
                                                  • The rate of bankruptcies is expected
will enter the market long after the current
                                                    to increase (in 2007 the rate was                 • The importance of low-cost country
downturn has worked through.
                                                    expected to decline).                               sourcing is falling.

                                                  • Tier 1 suppliers are by far the most likely
                                                                                                      More M&A and alliances are expected
                                                    to consider that bankruptcies will increase.
                                                                                                      • High costs and declining economies
                                                                                                        will drive restructuring.

                                                                                                      • Vehicle makers and dealers expected
                                                                                                        to restructure most.

                                                                                                      • Investment will grow more slowly – but
                                                                                                        innovation investment will be resilient.
Executive summary 5




2/ New markets                               3/ Technology and                               4/ Beyond crisis:
New-market growth expectations
                                             innovation                                      challenges and
outside China have been rebalanced
                                             Technology and innovation remain
                                                                                             opportunities
• Central and South America
                                             key industry trends
  expectations are resilient.                                                                Opportunities to find growth remain
                                             • Fuel efficiency improvements,
                                                                                             • Potential for growth seen in alternative
• Africa and the Middle East will              alternative fuel technologies and
                                                                                               fuels, fuel efficiency and emerging
  also grow.                                   environmental pressures are considered
                                                                                               markets.
                                               the three most influential trends.
Chinese growth seen as significantly                                                         • ASPAC companies are more focused on
                                             • Cost concerns are greatest among suppliers.
lower                                                                                          environment-related opportunities.
• Vehicle sales to grow more slowly
                                             Fuel efficiency and alternative propulsion      • Only limited opportunities seen in relation
  over five years.
                                             will drive product innovation                     to cost-cutting strategies.
• More than half of companies see            • Hybrid systems continue to be the most
  overcapacity emerging in the near term.      important product innovations.                External challenges dominate
                                                                                             • Global economy and financing costs are
• Export expectations are sharply reduced.   • Electric and battery technologies are
                                                                                               seen as the key challenges.
                                               growing in importance.
                                                                                             • Vehicle manufacturers most likely
                                             • Overall, there is increasing strategic
                                                                                               to see environmental pressure
                                               focus on technology.
                                                                                               as a challenge.
                                             • ASPAC companies are most
                                               innovation-focused.

                                             Consumer purchases to become
                                             more cost-driven
                                             • For the consumer fuel efficiency now
                                               more important than product quality.

                                             • Affordability is increasing in importance.

                                             • Consumers to become more discriminating.
6 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009




Introduction –

Seldom has a year made
such difference


Last year’s KPMG Global Auto Executive          Meanwhile, the market share winners of
Survey reported on an industry that saw         previous years are expected to continue to
itself emerging from a long round of cost       advance while the losers will do even worse,
cutting and restructuring. It saw itself        say companies. The strong will get stronger,
emerging into a world where overall growth      and the weak weaker.
seemed assured, and where both sales and
profits would be higher for companies that      Yet what is also striking is that amid
were, in most cases, leaner and fitter.         immediate concerns over downturn and
                                                volatility, the auto industry maintains a
In 2008, all that has changed.                  long-term focus on basic issues, and
The momentum of optimism has been               especially on technology, fuel efficiency and
checked: companies are now confronted           the environment. On a five-year horizon, say
with a world gone into reverse, where           companies, these issues continue to
growth is highly uncertain and where prices     dominate their thinking.
and financial conditions are highly volatile.
This change is visible in many areas. It is     Times have grown much harder – but the
visible in lower expectations for revenues      fundamental drivers of automotive success
and profitability, higher expectations of       have not greatly changed.
bankruptcy, and more pessimism on the
speed at which the industry can adapt to
challenging conditions. More companies
expect overcapacity to emerge in key
regions, and that sales and production
growth will fall in emerging markets in
particular. Investment is expected
to grow at a slower pace.
Oil prices and the KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 7




Oil prices and the KPMG Global Auto
Executive Survey –
This year’s Global Auto Executive
Survey took place against a background
of financial instability and great volatility
in oil prices. 


The survey was conducted from the end of           This was in stark contrast to the background          they report revenues and profitability falling,
September 2008, and through the following          of the previous four years of the survey,             overcapacity rising, and bankruptcy more likely.
month. During that period, the spot price of       when prices rose consistently – the spot              Perhaps more surprisingly, they also say that
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil fell       price of WTI rose from US$33.01 a barrel on           they expect the importance of hybrid and
from US$96.29 a barrel (on September 29)           January 1, 2004, to US$99.64 on January 1,            fuel-efficient vehicles to grow very strongly.
to US$61.92 a barrel (on October 27). At the       2008, spiking at US$141.06 a barrel on                We believe this reflects the fact that oil
same time an unprecedented global financial        July 1, 2008. Growth was high in the                  prices remain historically high. At the time of
crisis unfolded, and governments around the        Organisation for Economic Co-operation                publication, the oil price was around US$50
world committed large sums to bailing out          and Development (OECD) countries and                  a barrel – lower in inflation-adjusted terms
banks and stimulating their faltering economies.   at unprecedented levels in the four BRIC*             than any of the previous three years.
                                                   emerging economies.                                   But this is markedly higher than the
                                                                                                         inflation-adjusted average over the past
                                                   What does this background of instability and          two decades, when from 1988 to 2007 oil
                                                   price fall mean for this year’s survey results –      averaged US$33.36 a barrel in inflation-
                                                   given that expectations built up over the             adjusted terms (2007 dollars).
                                                   previous four years were being challenged
                                                                                                         (Price sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration;
                                                   by very rapid changes in external conditions?         inflationdata.com)
                                                   It is clear from the results that most, if not all,
                                                                                                         *Brazil, Russia, India and China
                                                   companies answered the survey questions
                                                   fully aware of the extent of the downturn:
8 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009




1/ Auto-making in crisis



Global economy 
                                                                                                      How important is each of the following
                                                                                                                      issues to the current state

concerns rising
                                                                                                      of the auto industry?

                                                                                                                      Source:
                                                                                                                      KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

                                                                                                                      Key
                                                                                                                            2006
                                                                                                                            2007
                                                                                                                            2008


                                                                                                                                                          90%
                                   Product quality                                                                                                                   96%
                                                                                                                                                                  94%
                                                                                                                                                    87%
                              The global economy                                                                                         81%
                                                                                                                              76%
                                                                                                                                                85%
                                   Reducing costs                                                                                                 86%
                                                                                                                                                        89%
                                                                                                                                           82%
                                New technologies                                                                                             83%
                                                                                                                                         81%
                                                                                                                                       81%
                                    New products                                                                                    79%
                                                                                                                        73%
                                                                                                                      72%
                                      Affordability   No data for 2006 and 2007

                                                                                                                69%
                             Environmental issues                             52%                   63%
                                                                              52%

                                                                                                                      72%
                         Product/pricing incentives                                                     65%
                                                                                                                  70%
                                                                        49%
                                    Labor relations                                         59%
                                                                              52%

                                                      40                50                  60                  70                  80                  90                 100

                                                      % rating important 4-5 on a scale of 1-5, where 1 means “Not at all important” and 5 means “Extremely important”




The mood of the world’s auto industry has             Yet in retrospect, it is clear that some of the                However, the number of companies citing
reversed: after the relative optimism of 2007         industry’s most fundamental concerns have                      labor relations as important has fallen in
with its expectations of a gradual return to          been on a rising track for some time. When                     2008: just under half of companies rate labor
stability and prosperity, expectations in 2008        companies were asked what were the most                        relations as important in 2008, compared
have changed for the worse.                           important issues for the industry overall –                    with 59 percent in 2007. The number of
                                                      the question that reveals the relative weight                  companies rating labor relations as
                                                      of long-term concerns – in 2008, the                           unimportant has also risen sharply from
                                                      deterioration of the global economy rose to                    9 percent in 2007 to 16 percent in 2008.
                                                      second place (from fourth place in 2007).                      This is consistent with the deterioration of
                                                      While traditional long-term concerns hold                      confidence in other areas in 2008: while last
                                                      their place in the rankings of overall issues                  year companies remained concerned about
                                                      (product quality remains the most cited                        labor shortages – especially in the fastest
                                                      issue, for example) companies have been                        expanding markets – in 2008, they appear to
                                                      consistently forecasting a deterioration of                    expect their key labor markets to loosen.
                                                      overall global growth for the last four years,
                                                      with concerns about the global economy
                                                      rising year on year from 2005.
1/ Auto-making in crisis 9




Profi
 forecast to be
     ts                                                                                                          Do you think the number of
                                                                                                                 bankruptcies will increase, remain

lower and more volatile                                                                                          the same, or decrease in the next
                                                                                                                 few years?

                                                                                                                 Source:
                                                                                                                 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

                                                                                                                 Key
As financial costs rise and raw material           50

costs remain volatile, expectations that                          46%                                                   2006
profitability over the next five years will                                                                             2007
also remain volatile have risen very sharply.                                                                           2008
An increase of expectations of ‘volatile           40   38%
                                                           37%
or unpredictable’ profits from 37 percent
of respondents in 2007 to 46 percent of
respondents in 2008 represents a sharp
                                                   30
rise in uncertainty and one that is all the
more striking in that the automotive industry                                               26%                 26%
                                                                                                                                                              24%
relies to an unusual degree on long-range                                                                             23%
forecasting. The minority of companies
                                                   20                                                                                           19%
predicting rising profits in 2007 (26 percent)
                                                                                      16%
has also fallen sharply in 2008, to only                                                        15%                        15%
                                                                                                                                                        14%
15 percent. The great majority of companies
(85 percent) think there will be either no         10
growth in profits, or that profits cannot
be predicted over the coming five years.
And almost a quarter (24 percent) think
profits will actually decline.                     0
                                                        The profitability of the      The profitability of       The profitability of               The profitability
                                                        industry will be volatile     the industry will          the industry will                  of the industry will
                                                        and unpredictable             generally rise             basically be flat                  generally decline




Suppliers seen as                                                                                                Of the following types of automotive
                                                                                                                 companies, which do you expect to be

least profitable                                                                                                 among the most profitable over the
                                                                                                                 next five years?
                                                                                                                 (Multiple responses allowed)

                                                                                                                 Source:
                                                                                                                 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009
                                                   80
                                                        76%
Who will suffer most from the expected                                                                           Key
decline in profitability? Companies believe                                                                             2007
that the pain will be distributed                                                                                       2008
approximately according to a respective            60
                                                             54%                    56%
position in the automotive value chain: Tier 3                               50%                  50%                 49%
suppliers, where profitability is in any case                                                                                                 45%
lowest, will suffer most (only 36 percent of                                                            40%     40%
respondents see Tier 3 companies as                40
                                                                                                                                                              36%
profitability leaders). This pattern is the same
                                                                                                                                        27%
as 2007, with one very significant exception:
the sharp decline in expectations for captive
                                                   20
finance companies. Expectations of their
profitability have collapsed from 76 percent
of respondents to only 54 percent,
reflecting the liquidity squeeze and the
                                                   0
recent unprecedented rise in the cost of
                                                        Captive              Vehicle              Dealers       Tier 1 suppliers        Tier 2 suppliers      Tier 3 suppliers*
wholesale funding.                                      finance              manufacturer
                                                        companies

                                                        *In previous years Tier 2 and 3 suppliers were combined in the questionnaire
10 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009
1/ Auto-making in crisis 11




Asian finance companies
may suffer

On a regional basis, companies are in broad
agreement about the impact of what is
expected to be a very difficult period for
profitability – with one exception. Asia is
significantly more pessimistic about the
profit prospects for finance companies.
As both consumers and financial institutions
in Asia tend to have less debt – and thus,
in principle, more borrowing capacity
than their counterparts in Europe and
the Americas – this pessimism is all the
more striking, reflecting both the global
nature of the contraction in demand and
the narrowing of financing options.




                                                                                                              Of the following types of automotive
                                                                                                              companies, which do you expect to be
                                                                                                              among the most profitable over the
                                                                                                              next five years?

                                                                                                              Source:
                                                                                                              KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

                                                                                                              Key
                                                                                                                       Americas
    80                                                                                                                 emA
                                                                                                                       ASpAC
                                     64%            100

    60                                                           90%
         55% 56% 55%           56%
                                                                   52%       87% 87%
                                                                49%                   48%
                                                          47%
                                                                                            44%                        45%
                                                    80
                                           40%                                  41%
                                                                                                          73%40% 37%                      45%
    40                                                     70%                                                                                        36%
                                                                                                    68%                        68%              33%
                                                                                                                                                        65%
                                                                                                                         62%
                                                                                                                                                  59%
                                                    60

    20



                                                    40

    0
          Vehicle              Financial                  Tier 1 suppliers       Tier 2 suppliers            Dealers                      Tier 3 suppliers
          manufacturer         services companies

                                                    20




                                                    0
                                                           Declining         Non-competitive        Excess debt           Pension liability       Healthcare
                                                           revenue base      cost structure                                                       benefit cost
12 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009




Bankruptcies to rise                                                                                          Do you think the number of
                                                                                                              bankruptcies will increase, remain
                                                                                                              the same, or decrease in the next
                                                                                                              few years?

                                                                                                              Source:
                                                   100                                                        KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

                                                                                                              Key
Companies say they expect that the rate of
bankruptcies will increase. The deterioration                                                                        2006
                                                   80                77%                                             2007
in expectations is both very steep and
represents a reversal of trend. Only 12                                                                              2008
months ago, companies reported increasing
optimism with expectations of increased
                                                   60    56%
bankruptcies falling year on year from 56
percent to 36 percent. In 2008, 77 percent                                            48%
of companies expected the rate to increase
– one of the largest one-year deteriorations       40          36%
in expectation in the survey. The number
                                                                                31%
of companies expecting no change has
fallen sharply, while the number expecting
                                                                                            20%
bankruptcies to fall has declined to a barely      20
significant 3 percent.                                                                                              13%
                                                                                                              10%

                                                                                                                          3%

                                                   0
                                                         Increase               Remain the same               Decrease




Revenue loss a                                                                                                Which of the following do you think
                                                                                                              are among the most important drivers

key concern                                                                                                   of bankruptcy?
                                                                                                              (Multiple responses allowed)

                                                                                                              Source:
                                                                                                              KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

                                                                                                              Key
Loss of revenues as demand growth slows            100
                                                                                                                     2007
or goes into reverse has taken over as the                     90%
                                                                                                                     2008
most important driver of bankruptcy – cited                                87% 87%

by 90 percent of respondents, compared
to 70 percent the previous year. However,          80
                                                                                                        73%
it is striking that all the potential drivers of         70%
                                                                                                  68%                           68%
bankruptcy are cited more often in 2008 than                                                                                                        65%
in 2007 (multiple answers could be given),                                                                                62%
                                                                                                                                              59%
                                                   60
suggesting that companies believe that
legacy cost structures, indebtedness
and social costs, including pensions
and healthcare, are all exerting greater
                                                   40
negative pressure in the deteriorating
business environment.


                                                   20




                                                   0
                                                         Declining         Non-competitive        Excess debt             Pension liability   Healthcare
                                                         revenue base      cost structure                                                     benefit cost
1/ Auto-making in crisis 13




Tier 1 suppliers see 

most bankruptcies


Tier 1 suppliers are markedly the most likely
to consider that bankruptcies will increase,                              Do you think the number of
with 87 percent forecasting an increase,                                  bankruptcies will increase,
against 75 percent of vehicle manufacturers                               remain the same, or decrease
(vehicle manufacturers are the only class of                              in the next few years?
company where any respondents believe that
bankruptcies may decrease. This may reflect                               Source:
their expectation of direct government                                    KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009
support packages during 2009). No Tier 2                                  Key
suppliers forecast a decrease in bankruptcies,
                                                                                increase
but they are also most likely to see the
                                                                                remain the same
bankruptcy rate as flat. There were no Tier 3
                                                                                Decrease
suppliers in the 2009 survey – see
methodology note on page 3.




                 8%
                                                 13%



    17%                                                                      33%




                                                                                                             67%


                                   75%

                                                                    87%


                      OEMs                             Tier 1 supplier                   Tier 2 supplier
14 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009




 Chinese and Indian brands
 to gain market share

 Market share expectations continue to shift                                         On a regional basis, EMA companies are
 in favor of emerging Asian and mature                                               markedly more optimistic on market share
 Japanese and Korean brands; U.S. brands                                             expectation than companies in the Americas
 are expected to perform worst. Year on year                                         or ASPAC – and in particular, they are more
 Chinese brands have moved from second to                                            optimistic on the prospects for European
 first place in market share expectations, and                                       brands (more than half of EMA companies
 Indian brands from fourth to second place,                                          see market share increases for VW
 relegating Toyota from top position to third.                                       and BMW).
 Expectations of Honda’s market share have
 grown, as have expectations for many
 European brands. Meanwhile, expectations
 for General Motors, Ford and Chrysler have
 declined further from an already low level,
 with 63 percent of respondents expecting
 Ford to lose market share, 66 percent for
 General Motors and 69 percent for Chrysler.


                                                                                                                                                              For each of the following companies,
                                                                                                                                                              over the next five years, will their
                                                                                                                                                              market share increase, remain the
                                                                                                                                                              same, or decrease?

                                                                                                                                                              Source:
                                                                                                                                                              KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

                                                                                                                                                              Key
                                                                                                                                                                       increase
                                                                                                                                                                       remain the same
                                                                                                                                                                       Decrease


 100
              7%             6%           11%             12%        9%              13%         14%        16%         28%    30%            17%            35%             32%         30%           66%    63%         69%

           12%               16%
                                          22%                       28%
                                                          22%
                                                                                     26%         43%        45%
 80
                                                                                                                                              51%
           81%
                             78%

                                                                                                                        39%
                                                                                                                               37%                                                       53%
                                          68%             67%                                                                                                                48%
 60                                                                                                                                                          44%
                                                                    62%
                                                                                     60%




 40
                                                                                                 43%
                                                                                                            40%
                                                                                                                                                                                                              24%
                                                                                                                                                                                                       12%
                                                                                                                        33%    33%            32%                                                                         21%

 20
                                                                                                                                                             20%             20%
                                                                                                                                                                                         17%
                                                                                                                                                                                                       15%
                                                                                                                                                                                                              13%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          10%
 0
                                                                                                                              at
         ds



                        ds




                                      a



                                                      ia



                                                                    da



                                                                                en




                                                                                                n



                                                                                                        W



                                                                                                                       ds




                                                                                                                                              s



                                                                                                                                                          hi




                                                                                                                                                                         n




                                                                                                                                                                                         i



                                                                                                                                                                                                      s



                                                                                                                                                                                                              rd



                                                                                                                                                                                                                         er
                                                                                                                                                                                         uj
                                     ot




                                                                                                                                         de




                                                                                                                                                                                                      or
                                                                                                sa




                                                                                                                                                                        oe
                                                     /K




                                                                                                                              Fi




                                                                                                                                                         is




                                                                                                                                                                                                             Fo



                                                                                                                                                                                                                     sl
                                                                                                       BM




                                                                                                                                                                                        /F
         an



                        an




                                                                on




                                                                                                                       an
                                                                                ag
                                      y




                                                                                                                                                                                                   ot
                                                                                                                                                        ub
                                                                                            is
                                                     ai




                                                                                                                                         ce




                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ry
                                                                                                                                                                       itr



                                                                                                                                                                                    ru
                                   To
      br



                    br




                                                                                                                   br
                                                                H



                                                                            w



                                                                                           tN




                                                                                                                                                                                                  M
                                                nd




                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ch
                                                                                                                                                                   t/C
                                                                                                                                                    its
                                                                                                                                     er




                                                                                                                                                                                    ba
                                                                          ks
     e



                   an




                                                                                                                  n
                                                yu




                                                                                                                                                                                               al
                                                                                                                                     M
                                                                                           ul




                                                                                                                                                    M




                                                                                                                                                                                   Su
 es




                                                                                                                  ia




                                                                                                                                                                  eo
                                                                            l
                                                                         Vo




                                                                                                                                                                                              er
               di




                                                                                       na
                                            H




                                                                                                              ss
 in




                                                                                                                                                              ug
              In




                                                                                                                                                                                             en
                                                                                     Re




                                                                                                            Ru
Ch




                                                                                                                                                             Pe




                                                                                                                                                                                         G
1/ Auto-making in crisis 15




Overcapacity                                                                                                             Is there global overcapacity in
                                                                                                                         the automotive industry today?

to increase                                                                                                              If yes, how much?

                                                                                                                         Source:
                                                                                                                         KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

                                                                                                                         Key

Auto industry assessments of levels of                                                                             59%
                                                                                                                                 2006
                                               60
overcapacity have also shifted, for the                                                                                          2007
worse, reflecting the declining demand                                                                                           2008
expectations. Overall, more companies          48
                                                                                                       44%
believe that overcapacity is now an issue,
and the proportion of respondents believing
it to be in the range of 11-20 percent has     36
                                                                                                             32%
risen markedly year on year, from 32 percent                  30%

to 59 percent. This assessment is confirmed                                         24%
by partial production suspensions announced    24
                                                                              21%
                                                                                          20%
by a range of auto-makers during the two
                                                                                                                           15%         15%
                                                                                                                                 14%
months following completion of this survey.
                                               12

                                                         6%
                                                                                                                                              5%              5%
                                                                                                                                                        3%              3%
                                                                    0%                                                                             0%              0%
                                               0
                                                         None                  1-10%                   11-20%              21-30%             31-40%          More than 40%




Asian companies see                                                                                                      Is there global overcapacity in the
                                                                                                                         automotive industry today?

most overcapacity                                                                                                        (Multiple responses allowed)

                                                                                                                         Source:
                                                                                                                         KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009
                                                   100



Regional assessments of the level of                                                        85%                          86%
overcapacity do not differ markedly,
                                                   80
although ASPAC companies are most                             77%

likely to consider that the industry has
overcapacity, while companies in the
Americas are least likely. Yet in all cases,       60
the proportion of companies seeing
overcapacity is high – even in the
Americas more than three quarters
of companies see overcapacity.                     40




                                                   20




                                                   0
                                                              Americas                          EMEA                     ASPAC

                                                              Note: ‘Yes’ percentages represented
16 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009




Cost saving is
innovation-focused

Amid declining revenues and falling
profitability, companies will need to cut
costs further. In 2008, companies were
generally more likely to rate cost savings
opportunities as important, compared
to 2007. Respondents continue to see
innovation (in manufacturing process and
materials technology) as a more important
cost-saving opportunity than direct overhead
cost reductions. The one area of potential
cost saving that has fallen –both in relative
and absolute importance in respondents’
ratings – is low-cost country sourcing,
reflecting the widespread belief that the
direct cost advantage of low-cost country
sourcing has largely been captured, and that
future savings will be found in process and
productivity improvements.




                                                                                                                   For auto manufacturers and suppliers,
                                                                                                                   rate their opportunity for future cost
                                                                                                                   savings in the following areas

                                                                                                                   Source:
                                                                                                                   KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009

                                                                                                                   Key
                                                                                                                         2006
                                                                                                                         2007
                                                                                                                         2008


                        Manufacturing process and                                                                                                         70%
                            technology innovations                                                                                                        67%
                         (including plant flexibility)                                                                                                  66%
                                                                                                                                           59%
                        Low-cost country sourcing                                                                                                      65%
                                                                                                                                                 61%
                                                                                                                                                         67%
                       Product materials innovation                                                                                      57%
                                                                                                                                                 61%

                           Overhead cost reduction                                                                                50%
                          including shared services                                                                        46%
                                                                                                       36%

                               Healthcare, benefits                                     28%
                                                                                                                           46%
                                and pension costs                                                  34%
                                                                                            29%
                                         Direct labor                                                                      46%
                                                                                                  32%

                           Computer modeling and                                                                     43%
                                                                                                                     43%
                              simulation in design                                                           38%
                                                                                                 31%
                       Local regional tax incentives                            16%   26%
                                                                     16%
                                                                                                                                48%
                                       Restructuring     No data for 2006 and 2007

                                                                                                                                          58%
                        Supply chain management          No data for 2006 and 2007

                                                         10                20               30                40                 50         60               70
1/ Auto-making in crisis 17




Suppliers see most cost-
saving opportunities

                                                                                                                                                                              For auto manufacturers and suppliers,
Tier 2 suppliers have higher expectations
                                                                                                                                                                              rate their opportunity for future
of finding cost savings in almost all areas
                                                                                                                                                                              cost-savings in the following areas
except social costs and supply chain
management. In particular, they see more
                                                                                                                                                                              Source:
savings potential in restructuring – reflecting
                                                                                                                                                                              KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009
the likely productivity and profitability gains
in what is the most fragmented segment                                                                                                                                        Key
of the automotive supply chain.
                                                                                                                                                                                      oems
                                                                                                                                                                                      tier 1 supplier
                                                                                                                                                                                      tier 2 supplier
       100


          90


          80
                              77%

                                                   70%
          70        68%69%                                                       67%
                                             65%66%
                                                                                                 62%                                               63%
          60                                                           59%
                                                                          57%                                                 56%
                                                                                            55%
                                                                                                     52%
          50                                                                                                       49%49%                     49%

                                                                                                                                         43%                   43%44%44%
                                                                                                                                                                                                 41%
          40

                                                                                                                                                                                      32%
                                                                                                                                                                                                            29%30%                      30%
          30                                                                                                                                                                                             28%
                                                                                                                                                                                           27%                                             27%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  25%

          20


          10


           0
                                              n




                                                                        ng




                                                                                                 t




                                                                                                                         n




                                                                                                                                               g




                                                                                                                                                                    g




                                                                                                                                                                                            es




                                                                                                                                                                                                                 r




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   its
                     s




                                                                                                en




                                                                                                                                                                                                               bo




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           s
                                             tio




                                                                                                                        io




                                                                                                                                           in




                                                                                                                                                                   lin
                    es




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           st
                                                                                                                                                                                         tiv




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   ef
                                                                       ci




                                                                                                                        ct




                                                                                                                                          ur
                                                                                            em




                                                                                                                                                                                                               la
                                                                                                                                                                  el
                         ns




                                             va




                                                                                                                             es




                                                                                                                                                                         gn




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        co
                   oc




                                                                       ur




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  en
                                                                                                                                                                                        en
                                                                                                                   du




                                                                                                                                         ct




                                                                                                                                                               od




                                                                                                                                                                                                            ct
                                        no
                        tio




                                                                  so




                                                                                                                         ic




                                                                                                                                                                       si
               pr




                                                                                           ag




                                                                                                                                     ru




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       n
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             ,b
                                                                                                                                                                                      nc
                                                                                                                   re




                                                                                                                                                                                                         ire
                                                                                                                         rv




                                                                                                                                                          rm

                                                                                                                                                                   de




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   io
                                        in
                     va




                                                                                           an




                                                                                                                                     st
               g




                                                                 try




                                                                                                                                                                                                                             re
                                                                                                                        se




                                                                                                                                                                                    li




                                                                                                                                                                                                        D




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ns
                                                                                                               st
          rin




                                                                                                                                    Re
                   no




                                    ls




                                                                                                                                                                  in
                                                                                                                                                          te
                                                                                       m




                                                                                                                                                                                   na




                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ca
                                                            un




                                                                                                              co




                                                                                                                                                                                                                              pe
                                   ia




                                                                                                                   ed
       tu




                                                                                                                                                         pu
                in




                                                                                                                                                               n




                                                                                                                                                                                 io
                                                                                      n
                                   er




                                                            co




                                                                                                                                                                                                                       lth
                                                                                                                                                              io
      ac




                                                                                                          d
                                                                                      ai




                                                                                                                   ar




                                                                                                                                                                               eg




                                                                                                                                                                                                                              d
                                                                                                                                                     m
               gy




                               at




                                                                                                         ea




                                                                                                                                                             at




                                                                                                                                                                                                                             an
                                                                                  ch




                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ea
                                                                                                               sh
     uf




                                                       st




                                                                                                                                                    Co




                                                                                                                                                                              lr
                              tm
           lo




                                                                                                                                                          ul
                                                                                                         rh
  an




                                                       co




                                                                                                                                                                                                                    H
                                                                                 ly




                                                                                                                                                                            ca
       no




                                                                                                              ng




                                                                                                                                                         m
                                                                                                     ve
                          uc




                                                                             pp
 M




                                                                                                                                                     si




                                                                                                                                                                         Lo
                                                   w
      ch




                                                                                                          di
                                                                                                     O
                         od




                                                                            Su
                                                  Lo




                                                                                                         lu




                                                                                                                                                    d
     te




                                                                                                                                                    an
                                                                                                        c
                        Pr




                                                                                                     in
  d
 an
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009
Momentum auto exec-2009

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Momentum auto exec-2009

Finance as Analytical Partner to the Business
Finance as Analytical Partner to the BusinessFinance as Analytical Partner to the Business
Finance as Analytical Partner to the BusinessSAP Analytics
 
arvinmeritor _Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
arvinmeritor _Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINALarvinmeritor _Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
arvinmeritor _Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINALfinance27
 
arvinmeritor Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
arvinmeritor Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINALarvinmeritor Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
arvinmeritor Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINALfinance27
 
High Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
High Efficiency in Manufacturing OperationsHigh Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
High Efficiency in Manufacturing OperationsFindWhitePapers
 
Management Tools and Trends 2011
Management Tools and Trends 2011Management Tools and Trends 2011
Management Tools and Trends 2011guitartp
 
Karen Tay - Article
Karen Tay - ArticleKaren Tay - Article
Karen Tay - Articlecynrx
 
Ems11 Programme
Ems11 ProgrammeEms11 Programme
Ems11 ProgrammeMandy_Long
 
5 ways CFOs can make cost cuts stick
5 ways CFOs can make cost cuts stick5 ways CFOs can make cost cuts stick
5 ways CFOs can make cost cuts stickManuel A. Velazquez
 
Keuka_Experiental Learning_295924
Keuka_Experiental Learning_295924Keuka_Experiental Learning_295924
Keuka_Experiental Learning_295924Sơn Trần
 
Part 1: Foundations of Holistic Process Optimization
Part 1: Foundations of Holistic Process OptimizationPart 1: Foundations of Holistic Process Optimization
Part 1: Foundations of Holistic Process OptimizationGappBridging
 
Bridging the Global Infrastructure Gap
Bridging the Global Infrastructure GapBridging the Global Infrastructure Gap
Bridging the Global Infrastructure GapJordi Planas Manzano
 
Capitalising on Complexity - Ross Pearce
Capitalising on Complexity - Ross PearceCapitalising on Complexity - Ross Pearce
Capitalising on Complexity - Ross PearceVincent Kwon
 
Ge Six Sigma
Ge Six SigmaGe Six Sigma
Ge Six Sigmagaurav
 
Management Tools 2009
Management Tools 2009Management Tools 2009
Management Tools 2009guitartp
 
Changing Landscape of Information Technology
Changing Landscape of Information TechnologyChanging Landscape of Information Technology
Changing Landscape of Information TechnologyAbhinav Mishra
 
Sustainability yearbook 2010
Sustainability yearbook 2010Sustainability yearbook 2010
Sustainability yearbook 2010colombiaclub
 

Similar a Momentum auto exec-2009 (20)

Finance as Analytical Partner to the Business
Finance as Analytical Partner to the BusinessFinance as Analytical Partner to the Business
Finance as Analytical Partner to the Business
 
arvinmeritor _Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
arvinmeritor _Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINALarvinmeritor _Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
arvinmeritor _Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
 
arvinmeritor Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
arvinmeritor Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINALarvinmeritor Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
arvinmeritor Announcement_of_LVS_Spinoff_050608_FINAL
 
High Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
High Efficiency in Manufacturing OperationsHigh Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
High Efficiency in Manufacturing Operations
 
Management Tools and Trends 2011
Management Tools and Trends 2011Management Tools and Trends 2011
Management Tools and Trends 2011
 
Karen Tay - Article
Karen Tay - ArticleKaren Tay - Article
Karen Tay - Article
 
Executive Outlook 2013 Report
Executive Outlook 2013 ReportExecutive Outlook 2013 Report
Executive Outlook 2013 Report
 
Ems11 Programme
Ems11 ProgrammeEms11 Programme
Ems11 Programme
 
5 ways CFOs can make cost cuts stick
5 ways CFOs can make cost cuts stick5 ways CFOs can make cost cuts stick
5 ways CFOs can make cost cuts stick
 
Keuka_Experiental Learning_295924
Keuka_Experiental Learning_295924Keuka_Experiental Learning_295924
Keuka_Experiental Learning_295924
 
Part 1: Foundations of Holistic Process Optimization
Part 1: Foundations of Holistic Process OptimizationPart 1: Foundations of Holistic Process Optimization
Part 1: Foundations of Holistic Process Optimization
 
Performance in-the-crosshairs-v3
Performance in-the-crosshairs-v3Performance in-the-crosshairs-v3
Performance in-the-crosshairs-v3
 
Bridging the Global Infrastructure Gap
Bridging the Global Infrastructure GapBridging the Global Infrastructure Gap
Bridging the Global Infrastructure Gap
 
Integration Of Six Sigma With Business Analysis White Paper
Integration Of Six Sigma With Business Analysis White PaperIntegration Of Six Sigma With Business Analysis White Paper
Integration Of Six Sigma With Business Analysis White Paper
 
Six Sigma Cases
Six Sigma CasesSix Sigma Cases
Six Sigma Cases
 
Capitalising on Complexity - Ross Pearce
Capitalising on Complexity - Ross PearceCapitalising on Complexity - Ross Pearce
Capitalising on Complexity - Ross Pearce
 
Ge Six Sigma
Ge Six SigmaGe Six Sigma
Ge Six Sigma
 
Management Tools 2009
Management Tools 2009Management Tools 2009
Management Tools 2009
 
Changing Landscape of Information Technology
Changing Landscape of Information TechnologyChanging Landscape of Information Technology
Changing Landscape of Information Technology
 
Sustainability yearbook 2010
Sustainability yearbook 2010Sustainability yearbook 2010
Sustainability yearbook 2010
 

Más de rollerballrohit8

Understanding the-health-of-your-supplier
Understanding the-health-of-your-supplierUnderstanding the-health-of-your-supplier
Understanding the-health-of-your-supplierrollerballrohit8
 
Revenue recognition-auto-industry
Revenue recognition-auto-industryRevenue recognition-auto-industry
Revenue recognition-auto-industryrollerballrohit8
 
Non prime-auto-underwriting
Non prime-auto-underwritingNon prime-auto-underwriting
Non prime-auto-underwritingrollerballrohit8
 
Electricvehicles austrianclimateresearch
Electricvehicles austrianclimateresearchElectricvehicles austrianclimateresearch
Electricvehicles austrianclimateresearchrollerballrohit8
 
Report auto component_market
Report auto component_marketReport auto component_market
Report auto component_marketrollerballrohit8
 
Asean automotive market final
Asean automotive market finalAsean automotive market final
Asean automotive market finalrollerballrohit8
 
Adopting electric-vehicles
Adopting electric-vehiclesAdopting electric-vehicles
Adopting electric-vehiclesrollerballrohit8
 
20100201 multi channel sales approach for premium autos
20100201 multi channel sales approach for premium autos20100201 multi channel sales approach for premium autos
20100201 multi channel sales approach for premium autosrollerballrohit8
 

Más de rollerballrohit8 (9)

Understanding the-health-of-your-supplier
Understanding the-health-of-your-supplierUnderstanding the-health-of-your-supplier
Understanding the-health-of-your-supplier
 
Revenue recognition-auto-industry
Revenue recognition-auto-industryRevenue recognition-auto-industry
Revenue recognition-auto-industry
 
Non prime-auto-underwriting
Non prime-auto-underwritingNon prime-auto-underwriting
Non prime-auto-underwriting
 
Electricvehicles austrianclimateresearch
Electricvehicles austrianclimateresearchElectricvehicles austrianclimateresearch
Electricvehicles austrianclimateresearch
 
Automotive now oct-2010
Automotive now oct-2010Automotive now oct-2010
Automotive now oct-2010
 
Report auto component_market
Report auto component_marketReport auto component_market
Report auto component_market
 
Asean automotive market final
Asean automotive market finalAsean automotive market final
Asean automotive market final
 
Adopting electric-vehicles
Adopting electric-vehiclesAdopting electric-vehicles
Adopting electric-vehicles
 
20100201 multi channel sales approach for premium autos
20100201 multi channel sales approach for premium autos20100201 multi channel sales approach for premium autos
20100201 multi channel sales approach for premium autos
 

Momentum auto exec-2009

  • 1. Automotive Momentum: KPMG’s Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Industry concerns and expectations 2009-2013 kpmg internAtionAl
  • 2. KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Contents – Foreword 01 Survey methodology 02 Executive summary 04 Introduction 06 Oil prices and the KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 07 1/ Auto-making in crisis 08 2/ New markets 22 3/ Technology and innovation 26 4/ Beyond crisis: challenges and opportunities 34 Conclusion 40
  • 3. Foreword 1 Foreword – KPMG’s Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 coincided with the unfolding of an unprecedented global economic crisis with profound implications for the automotive industry. The expectations recorded in this survey reflect the depth of the crisis. The cautious optimism evident among It is clear that the near future is going to be These are difficult times. Yet the KPMG automotive decision-makers in 2007 is very tough for the automotive industry. Yet Global Auto Executive Survey shows that gone. In the last quarter of 2008, companies the KPMG Survey also shows that long-term many companies are well aware of the expect lower revenues, lower profits, concerns have not greatly changed. When challenges they face – and that many are more bankruptcies, and a long cycle of asked about long-term trends, opportunities ready to build on their strengths as they restructuring to come. They see more and challenges, companies continue to say face those challenges. overcapacity emerging, and they believe they retain a long-term focus on innovation investment will slow. and technology – particularly fuel technologies. These lowered expectations are not confined The 2009 Survey suggests that innovation to the mature automotive economies. In China and technology are likely to be at the heart and India too – economies where growth is of industry efforts to recapture profitability in still high – companies believe that production the coming months and years. For example, and sales in the coming five years will be innovation – especially process innovation – considerably lower than previously anticipated. is still seen by companies as the best way to cut costs, rather than attacking direct A sharp lowering of expectations is hardly overheads. Companies also believe that surprising, given the extent of the current product innovation will be key to rebuilding Uwe Achterholt downturn and its impact on auto sales. What sales: it is notable that despite the fall in Global Chair, Automotive is surprising can be found in the detail. For energy costs during the last few months, KPMG in Germany example, the KPMG Survey shows that many expectations of sales of hybrid and other automotive companies saw today’s crisis fuel-efficient vehicles continue to rise coming: our historical comparisons show sharply compared with previous years. that concerns over the global economy have actually been rising for the last three years. And in the midst of pessimism, companies also tell us about success. They say that effective management will be the key to success. They do not believe that it is marketing or brand power that will pull them out of recession, but the leveraging of technology and meeting customer needs.
  • 4. 2 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Survey methodology – The KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 is the tenth consecutive annual survey of senior global auto executives carried out by KPMG firms. This year the survey is more extensive than in previous years: 200 respondents took part in the survey between September 22 and October 31 2008, including companies in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, Africa and the Middle East.
  • 5. Survey methodology 3 Survey participants Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 by job title Key managers and senior managers Directors Head of department 2% ‘C’ level executives 7% others 5% vice president president 6% 39% 17% 26% Survey participants Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 by company type Key vehicle manufacturers tier 1 supplier 14% tier 2 supplier 41% 46% Each year we ask executives to describe A small number of questions in the survey themselves and their companies. Although were asked of companies in the U.S. but not we look for a balanced mix of auto-makers of companies in other countries (these were and suppliers, this year* no respondents questions relating to U.S. restructuring plans chose to describe themselves as Tier 3 and progress). Where these results are cited suppliers, although in previous years the in the survey, they are also flagged as ‘U.S. survey did include responses from Tier 3 only’ results. suppliers. In order to present results that are comparable with previous years, we have therefore grouped Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers together. This year’s results from Tier 2 suppliers are therefore compared with the previous two-year results from a combination of Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers. * Research took place in the last quarter of 2008. Report published in early 2009.
  • 6. 4 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Executive summary – The mood has changed, and the change has been very rapid Market share expectations continue Only 12 months ago, companies were beginning to express a cautious optimism 1/Auto-making in crisis to shift in favor of emerging Asian and after several years of challenge. Companies mature Japanese and Korean brands The 2009 KPMG Auto Executive Survey saw a world where growth was strong, • Chinese brands have moved from makes it clear that the fundamental issues and emerging market growth was second to first place in market share concerning auto-makers have been unprecedented. They saw margins and expectations, and Indian brands from rebalanced, but the pattern of concern profits beginning to be rebuilt, as a result fourth to second place. remains unchanged. of long-term restructuring and globalization • Expectations for U.S. auto-makers have of manufacturing. Key issues declined further from a low level. • Product quality remains the most cited issue. Today, much of that optimism has been • Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMA) deferred, if not abandoned. In established • The deterioration of the global economy companies are markedly more optimistic markets, sales are falling, investments are has continued to rise as a concern. on market share expectation than being reviewed, and some very large auto companies in the Americas or Asia • Labor relations continue to fall in importance. companies are close to insolvency. Pacific (ASPAC). Margins and profitability are expected In emerging markets, prospects are being Auto industry assessments of levels of to fall scaled back far and fast, as consumer overcapacity have shifted for the worse • The great majority of companies surveyed markets are hit by rapid credit contraction and • ASPAC companies are most likely to consider think there will either be no growth in a sudden slowdown in overall growth rates. that the industry has overcapacity, while profits or that profits cannot be predicted companies in the Americas are least likely. over the coming five years – and almost a But auto-making is a long-term business with quarter think profits will actually decline. a long-term horizon, and long-term concerns Cost saving is a rising concern have not changed. Automotive companies • Captive finance company profits are • Innovation (in manufacturing processes and remain concerned with innovation and the expected to decline sharply. materials technology) is more important leveraging of technology into products that than direct overhead cost reductions. • The rate of bankruptcies is expected will enter the market long after the current to increase (in 2007 the rate was • The importance of low-cost country downturn has worked through. expected to decline). sourcing is falling. • Tier 1 suppliers are by far the most likely More M&A and alliances are expected to consider that bankruptcies will increase. • High costs and declining economies will drive restructuring. • Vehicle makers and dealers expected to restructure most. • Investment will grow more slowly – but innovation investment will be resilient.
  • 7. Executive summary 5 2/ New markets 3/ Technology and 4/ Beyond crisis: New-market growth expectations innovation challenges and outside China have been rebalanced Technology and innovation remain opportunities • Central and South America key industry trends expectations are resilient. Opportunities to find growth remain • Fuel efficiency improvements, • Potential for growth seen in alternative • Africa and the Middle East will alternative fuel technologies and fuels, fuel efficiency and emerging also grow. environmental pressures are considered markets. the three most influential trends. Chinese growth seen as significantly • ASPAC companies are more focused on • Cost concerns are greatest among suppliers. lower environment-related opportunities. • Vehicle sales to grow more slowly Fuel efficiency and alternative propulsion • Only limited opportunities seen in relation over five years. will drive product innovation to cost-cutting strategies. • More than half of companies see • Hybrid systems continue to be the most overcapacity emerging in the near term. important product innovations. External challenges dominate • Global economy and financing costs are • Export expectations are sharply reduced. • Electric and battery technologies are seen as the key challenges. growing in importance. • Vehicle manufacturers most likely • Overall, there is increasing strategic to see environmental pressure focus on technology. as a challenge. • ASPAC companies are most innovation-focused. Consumer purchases to become more cost-driven • For the consumer fuel efficiency now more important than product quality. • Affordability is increasing in importance. • Consumers to become more discriminating.
  • 8. 6 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Introduction – Seldom has a year made such difference Last year’s KPMG Global Auto Executive Meanwhile, the market share winners of Survey reported on an industry that saw previous years are expected to continue to itself emerging from a long round of cost advance while the losers will do even worse, cutting and restructuring. It saw itself say companies. The strong will get stronger, emerging into a world where overall growth and the weak weaker. seemed assured, and where both sales and profits would be higher for companies that Yet what is also striking is that amid were, in most cases, leaner and fitter. immediate concerns over downturn and volatility, the auto industry maintains a In 2008, all that has changed. long-term focus on basic issues, and The momentum of optimism has been especially on technology, fuel efficiency and checked: companies are now confronted the environment. On a five-year horizon, say with a world gone into reverse, where companies, these issues continue to growth is highly uncertain and where prices dominate their thinking. and financial conditions are highly volatile. This change is visible in many areas. It is Times have grown much harder – but the visible in lower expectations for revenues fundamental drivers of automotive success and profitability, higher expectations of have not greatly changed. bankruptcy, and more pessimism on the speed at which the industry can adapt to challenging conditions. More companies expect overcapacity to emerge in key regions, and that sales and production growth will fall in emerging markets in particular. Investment is expected to grow at a slower pace.
  • 9. Oil prices and the KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 7 Oil prices and the KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey – This year’s Global Auto Executive Survey took place against a background of financial instability and great volatility in oil prices. The survey was conducted from the end of This was in stark contrast to the background they report revenues and profitability falling, September 2008, and through the following of the previous four years of the survey, overcapacity rising, and bankruptcy more likely. month. During that period, the spot price of when prices rose consistently – the spot Perhaps more surprisingly, they also say that West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil fell price of WTI rose from US$33.01 a barrel on they expect the importance of hybrid and from US$96.29 a barrel (on September 29) January 1, 2004, to US$99.64 on January 1, fuel-efficient vehicles to grow very strongly. to US$61.92 a barrel (on October 27). At the 2008, spiking at US$141.06 a barrel on We believe this reflects the fact that oil same time an unprecedented global financial July 1, 2008. Growth was high in the prices remain historically high. At the time of crisis unfolded, and governments around the Organisation for Economic Co-operation publication, the oil price was around US$50 world committed large sums to bailing out and Development (OECD) countries and a barrel – lower in inflation-adjusted terms banks and stimulating their faltering economies. at unprecedented levels in the four BRIC* than any of the previous three years. emerging economies. But this is markedly higher than the inflation-adjusted average over the past What does this background of instability and two decades, when from 1988 to 2007 oil price fall mean for this year’s survey results – averaged US$33.36 a barrel in inflation- given that expectations built up over the adjusted terms (2007 dollars). previous four years were being challenged (Price sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration; by very rapid changes in external conditions? inflationdata.com) It is clear from the results that most, if not all, *Brazil, Russia, India and China companies answered the survey questions fully aware of the extent of the downturn:
  • 10. 8 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 1/ Auto-making in crisis Global economy How important is each of the following issues to the current state concerns rising of the auto industry? Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Key 2006 2007 2008 90% Product quality 96% 94% 87% The global economy 81% 76% 85% Reducing costs 86% 89% 82% New technologies 83% 81% 81% New products 79% 73% 72% Affordability No data for 2006 and 2007 69% Environmental issues 52% 63% 52% 72% Product/pricing incentives 65% 70% 49% Labor relations 59% 52% 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % rating important 4-5 on a scale of 1-5, where 1 means “Not at all important” and 5 means “Extremely important” The mood of the world’s auto industry has Yet in retrospect, it is clear that some of the However, the number of companies citing reversed: after the relative optimism of 2007 industry’s most fundamental concerns have labor relations as important has fallen in with its expectations of a gradual return to been on a rising track for some time. When 2008: just under half of companies rate labor stability and prosperity, expectations in 2008 companies were asked what were the most relations as important in 2008, compared have changed for the worse. important issues for the industry overall – with 59 percent in 2007. The number of the question that reveals the relative weight companies rating labor relations as of long-term concerns – in 2008, the unimportant has also risen sharply from deterioration of the global economy rose to 9 percent in 2007 to 16 percent in 2008. second place (from fourth place in 2007). This is consistent with the deterioration of While traditional long-term concerns hold confidence in other areas in 2008: while last their place in the rankings of overall issues year companies remained concerned about (product quality remains the most cited labor shortages – especially in the fastest issue, for example) companies have been expanding markets – in 2008, they appear to consistently forecasting a deterioration of expect their key labor markets to loosen. overall global growth for the last four years, with concerns about the global economy rising year on year from 2005.
  • 11. 1/ Auto-making in crisis 9 Profi forecast to be ts Do you think the number of bankruptcies will increase, remain lower and more volatile the same, or decrease in the next few years? Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Key As financial costs rise and raw material 50 costs remain volatile, expectations that 46% 2006 profitability over the next five years will 2007 also remain volatile have risen very sharply. 2008 An increase of expectations of ‘volatile 40 38% 37% or unpredictable’ profits from 37 percent of respondents in 2007 to 46 percent of respondents in 2008 represents a sharp 30 rise in uncertainty and one that is all the more striking in that the automotive industry 26% 26% 24% relies to an unusual degree on long-range 23% forecasting. The minority of companies 20 19% predicting rising profits in 2007 (26 percent) 16% has also fallen sharply in 2008, to only 15% 15% 14% 15 percent. The great majority of companies (85 percent) think there will be either no 10 growth in profits, or that profits cannot be predicted over the coming five years. And almost a quarter (24 percent) think profits will actually decline. 0 The profitability of the The profitability of The profitability of The profitability industry will be volatile the industry will the industry will of the industry will and unpredictable generally rise basically be flat generally decline Suppliers seen as Of the following types of automotive companies, which do you expect to be least profitable among the most profitable over the next five years? (Multiple responses allowed) Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 80 76% Who will suffer most from the expected Key decline in profitability? Companies believe 2007 that the pain will be distributed 2008 approximately according to a respective 60 54% 56% position in the automotive value chain: Tier 3 50% 50% 49% suppliers, where profitability is in any case 45% lowest, will suffer most (only 36 percent of 40% 40% respondents see Tier 3 companies as 40 36% profitability leaders). This pattern is the same 27% as 2007, with one very significant exception: the sharp decline in expectations for captive 20 finance companies. Expectations of their profitability have collapsed from 76 percent of respondents to only 54 percent, reflecting the liquidity squeeze and the 0 recent unprecedented rise in the cost of Captive Vehicle Dealers Tier 1 suppliers Tier 2 suppliers Tier 3 suppliers* wholesale funding. finance manufacturer companies *In previous years Tier 2 and 3 suppliers were combined in the questionnaire
  • 12. 10 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009
  • 13. 1/ Auto-making in crisis 11 Asian finance companies may suffer On a regional basis, companies are in broad agreement about the impact of what is expected to be a very difficult period for profitability – with one exception. Asia is significantly more pessimistic about the profit prospects for finance companies. As both consumers and financial institutions in Asia tend to have less debt – and thus, in principle, more borrowing capacity than their counterparts in Europe and the Americas – this pessimism is all the more striking, reflecting both the global nature of the contraction in demand and the narrowing of financing options. Of the following types of automotive companies, which do you expect to be among the most profitable over the next five years? Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Key Americas 80 emA ASpAC 64% 100 60 90% 55% 56% 55% 56% 52% 87% 87% 49% 48% 47% 44% 45% 80 40% 41% 73%40% 37% 45% 40 70% 36% 68% 68% 33% 65% 62% 59% 60 20 40 0 Vehicle Financial Tier 1 suppliers Tier 2 suppliers Dealers Tier 3 suppliers manufacturer services companies 20 0 Declining Non-competitive Excess debt Pension liability Healthcare revenue base cost structure benefit cost
  • 14. 12 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Bankruptcies to rise Do you think the number of bankruptcies will increase, remain the same, or decrease in the next few years? Source: 100 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Key Companies say they expect that the rate of bankruptcies will increase. The deterioration 2006 80 77% 2007 in expectations is both very steep and represents a reversal of trend. Only 12 2008 months ago, companies reported increasing optimism with expectations of increased 60 56% bankruptcies falling year on year from 56 percent to 36 percent. In 2008, 77 percent 48% of companies expected the rate to increase – one of the largest one-year deteriorations 40 36% in expectation in the survey. The number 31% of companies expecting no change has fallen sharply, while the number expecting 20% bankruptcies to fall has declined to a barely 20 significant 3 percent. 13% 10% 3% 0 Increase Remain the same Decrease Revenue loss a Which of the following do you think are among the most important drivers key concern of bankruptcy? (Multiple responses allowed) Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Key Loss of revenues as demand growth slows 100 2007 or goes into reverse has taken over as the 90% 2008 most important driver of bankruptcy – cited 87% 87% by 90 percent of respondents, compared to 70 percent the previous year. However, 80 73% it is striking that all the potential drivers of 70% 68% 68% bankruptcy are cited more often in 2008 than 65% in 2007 (multiple answers could be given), 62% 59% 60 suggesting that companies believe that legacy cost structures, indebtedness and social costs, including pensions and healthcare, are all exerting greater 40 negative pressure in the deteriorating business environment. 20 0 Declining Non-competitive Excess debt Pension liability Healthcare revenue base cost structure benefit cost
  • 15. 1/ Auto-making in crisis 13 Tier 1 suppliers see most bankruptcies Tier 1 suppliers are markedly the most likely to consider that bankruptcies will increase, Do you think the number of with 87 percent forecasting an increase, bankruptcies will increase, against 75 percent of vehicle manufacturers remain the same, or decrease (vehicle manufacturers are the only class of in the next few years? company where any respondents believe that bankruptcies may decrease. This may reflect Source: their expectation of direct government KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 support packages during 2009). No Tier 2 Key suppliers forecast a decrease in bankruptcies, increase but they are also most likely to see the remain the same bankruptcy rate as flat. There were no Tier 3 Decrease suppliers in the 2009 survey – see methodology note on page 3. 8% 13% 17% 33% 67% 75% 87% OEMs Tier 1 supplier Tier 2 supplier
  • 16. 14 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Chinese and Indian brands to gain market share Market share expectations continue to shift On a regional basis, EMA companies are in favor of emerging Asian and mature markedly more optimistic on market share Japanese and Korean brands; U.S. brands expectation than companies in the Americas are expected to perform worst. Year on year or ASPAC – and in particular, they are more Chinese brands have moved from second to optimistic on the prospects for European first place in market share expectations, and brands (more than half of EMA companies Indian brands from fourth to second place, see market share increases for VW relegating Toyota from top position to third. and BMW). Expectations of Honda’s market share have grown, as have expectations for many European brands. Meanwhile, expectations for General Motors, Ford and Chrysler have declined further from an already low level, with 63 percent of respondents expecting Ford to lose market share, 66 percent for General Motors and 69 percent for Chrysler. For each of the following companies, over the next five years, will their market share increase, remain the same, or decrease? Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Key increase remain the same Decrease 100 7% 6% 11% 12% 9% 13% 14% 16% 28% 30% 17% 35% 32% 30% 66% 63% 69% 12% 16% 22% 28% 22% 26% 43% 45% 80 51% 81% 78% 39% 37% 53% 68% 67% 48% 60 44% 62% 60% 40 43% 40% 24% 12% 33% 33% 32% 21% 20 20% 20% 17% 15% 13% 10% 0 at ds ds a ia da en n W ds s hi n i s rd er uj ot de or sa oe /K Fi is Fo sl BM /F an an on an ag y ot ub is ai ce ry itr ru To br br br H w tN M nd Ch t/C its er ba ks e an n yu al M ul M Su es ia eo l Vo er di na H ss in ug In en Re Ru Ch Pe G
  • 17. 1/ Auto-making in crisis 15 Overcapacity Is there global overcapacity in the automotive industry today? to increase If yes, how much? Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Key Auto industry assessments of levels of 59% 2006 60 overcapacity have also shifted, for the 2007 worse, reflecting the declining demand 2008 expectations. Overall, more companies 48 44% believe that overcapacity is now an issue, and the proportion of respondents believing it to be in the range of 11-20 percent has 36 32% risen markedly year on year, from 32 percent 30% to 59 percent. This assessment is confirmed 24% by partial production suspensions announced 24 21% 20% by a range of auto-makers during the two 15% 15% 14% months following completion of this survey. 12 6% 5% 5% 3% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0 None 1-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% More than 40% Asian companies see Is there global overcapacity in the automotive industry today? most overcapacity (Multiple responses allowed) Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 100 Regional assessments of the level of 85% 86% overcapacity do not differ markedly, 80 although ASPAC companies are most 77% likely to consider that the industry has overcapacity, while companies in the Americas are least likely. Yet in all cases, 60 the proportion of companies seeing overcapacity is high – even in the Americas more than three quarters of companies see overcapacity. 40 20 0 Americas EMEA ASPAC Note: ‘Yes’ percentages represented
  • 18. 16 KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Cost saving is innovation-focused Amid declining revenues and falling profitability, companies will need to cut costs further. In 2008, companies were generally more likely to rate cost savings opportunities as important, compared to 2007. Respondents continue to see innovation (in manufacturing process and materials technology) as a more important cost-saving opportunity than direct overhead cost reductions. The one area of potential cost saving that has fallen –both in relative and absolute importance in respondents’ ratings – is low-cost country sourcing, reflecting the widespread belief that the direct cost advantage of low-cost country sourcing has largely been captured, and that future savings will be found in process and productivity improvements. For auto manufacturers and suppliers, rate their opportunity for future cost savings in the following areas Source: KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 Key 2006 2007 2008 Manufacturing process and 70% technology innovations 67% (including plant flexibility) 66% 59% Low-cost country sourcing 65% 61% 67% Product materials innovation 57% 61% Overhead cost reduction 50% including shared services 46% 36% Healthcare, benefits 28% 46% and pension costs 34% 29% Direct labor 46% 32% Computer modeling and 43% 43% simulation in design 38% 31% Local regional tax incentives 16% 26% 16% 48% Restructuring No data for 2006 and 2007 58% Supply chain management No data for 2006 and 2007 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
  • 19. 1/ Auto-making in crisis 17 Suppliers see most cost- saving opportunities For auto manufacturers and suppliers, Tier 2 suppliers have higher expectations rate their opportunity for future of finding cost savings in almost all areas cost-savings in the following areas except social costs and supply chain management. In particular, they see more Source: savings potential in restructuring – reflecting KPMG Global Auto Executive Survey 2009 the likely productivity and profitability gains in what is the most fragmented segment Key of the automotive supply chain. oems tier 1 supplier tier 2 supplier 100 90 80 77% 70% 70 68%69% 67% 65%66% 62% 63% 60 59% 57% 56% 55% 52% 50 49%49% 49% 43% 43%44%44% 41% 40 32% 29%30% 30% 30 28% 27% 27% 25% 20 10 0 n ng t n g g es r its s en bo s tio io in lin es st tiv ef ci ct ur em la el ns va es gn co oc ur en en du ct od ct no tio so ic si pr ag ru n ,b nc re ire rv rm de io in va an st g try re se li D ns st rin Re no ls in te m na ca un co pe ia ed tu pu in n io n er co lth io ac d ai ar eg d m gy at ea at an ch ea sh uf st Co lr tm lo ul rh an co H ly ca no ng m ve uc pp M si Lo w ch di O od Su Lo lu d te an c Pr in d an