SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 2
Unit 66-Sidekick
Review
Overall in the unit, I think my work was to a decent
standard, I wasn’t too disappointed by it, although I
found certain tasks tedious and a little confusing as
we’d only just finished with the very basic modelling
tutorials and we were thrown into the deep end.
But once It was done in the end, I was impressed with
my model and how simple it actually turned out to be
when it wasn’t just myself panicking at the littlest of
tasks within the unit.
Some things I found rather tedious were being thrown
into modelling with very basic knowledge and utilities
that we were aware on how to use, such as the mirror
tool within Lightwave Modeller, it was difficult getting
it all centred and easily connected as some of the
polygons became non-planar after I made little
adjustments.
I’m impressed with my work give the experience I had
when I designed, modelled and presented my sidekick,
I feel I used my design pack to an advantage to be able
to make it to how I originally anticipated, with the
exception of some new additions to the sidekick to
make it seem a little more to spec.

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente (19)

Question 6 what have you learnt about
Question 6   what have you learnt aboutQuestion 6   what have you learnt about
Question 6 what have you learnt about
 
Evaluation 6
Evaluation 6Evaluation 6
Evaluation 6
 
What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this...
What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this...What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this...
What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this...
 
Introducing SketchDeck
Introducing SketchDeckIntroducing SketchDeck
Introducing SketchDeck
 
Evaluation q6
Evaluation q6Evaluation q6
Evaluation q6
 
Unit 64 evaluation
Unit 64 evaluationUnit 64 evaluation
Unit 64 evaluation
 
Q6
Q6Q6
Q6
 
Q6
Q6Q6
Q6
 
Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6
 
Question 6
Question 6Question 6
Question 6
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Technology used in producing my magazine
Technology used in producing my magazineTechnology used in producing my magazine
Technology used in producing my magazine
 
Question six
Question sixQuestion six
Question six
 
Technologies
TechnologiesTechnologies
Technologies
 
Evaluation Question 6
Evaluation Question 6Evaluation Question 6
Evaluation Question 6
 
Question 6
Question 6Question 6
Question 6
 
Preliminary task
Preliminary taskPreliminary task
Preliminary task
 
Preliminary Evaluation
Preliminary EvaluationPreliminary Evaluation
Preliminary Evaluation
 
6
66
6
 

Similar a Unit 66 review (20)

Task 7
Task 7Task 7
Task 7
 
Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6
 
Midterm portfolio final
Midterm portfolio finalMidterm portfolio final
Midterm portfolio final
 
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
 
Final media evaluation q6
Final media evaluation q6Final media evaluation q6
Final media evaluation q6
 
Final media evaluation q6
Final media evaluation q6Final media evaluation q6
Final media evaluation q6
 
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
 
Question 6 F
Question 6 F Question 6 F
Question 6 F
 
Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6
 
Media Evaluation Question 7
Media Evaluation Question 7Media Evaluation Question 7
Media Evaluation Question 7
 
Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6
 
Evaluation Question 6
Evaluation Question 6Evaluation Question 6
Evaluation Question 6
 
Evaluation q4
Evaluation q4Evaluation q4
Evaluation q4
 
What have you learnt about technologies from the
What have you learnt about technologies from theWhat have you learnt about technologies from the
What have you learnt about technologies from the
 
Q6
Q6Q6
Q6
 
Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6 Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6
 
TECHNOLOGY.
TECHNOLOGY.TECHNOLOGY.
TECHNOLOGY.
 
Question 6
Question 6 Question 6
Question 6
 
Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6
 
Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6Evaluation question 6
Evaluation question 6
 

Más de rosstapher (20)

Evaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmpEvaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmp
 
Evaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmpEvaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmp
 
Evaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmpEvaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmp
 
Evaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmpEvaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmp
 
Ross loynd final major project production diary
Ross loynd final major project production diaryRoss loynd final major project production diary
Ross loynd final major project production diary
 
Evaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmpEvaluation of fmp
Evaluation of fmp
 
Ross loynd final major project production diary
Ross loynd final major project production diaryRoss loynd final major project production diary
Ross loynd final major project production diary
 
Storyboard
StoryboardStoryboard
Storyboard
 
Materials
MaterialsMaterials
Materials
 
Fmp art pitch
Fmp art pitchFmp art pitch
Fmp art pitch
 
Pitch
PitchPitch
Pitch
 
Final major project proposal form contrast
Final major project proposal form contrastFinal major project proposal form contrast
Final major project proposal form contrast
 
Briefs
BriefsBriefs
Briefs
 
IG5 FMP Brief
IG5 FMP BriefIG5 FMP Brief
IG5 FMP Brief
 
3d unity game workflow
3d unity game workflow3d unity game workflow
3d unity game workflow
 
Addressing audiences
Addressing audiencesAddressing audiences
Addressing audiences
 
Documentation
DocumentationDocumentation
Documentation
 
Documentation of my 2D game
Documentation of my 2D gameDocumentation of my 2D game
Documentation of my 2D game
 
Concept artists
Concept artistsConcept artists
Concept artists
 
Gta v qualitative
Gta v qualitativeGta v qualitative
Gta v qualitative
 

Unit 66 review

  • 1. Unit 66-Sidekick Review Overall in the unit, I think my work was to a decent standard, I wasn’t too disappointed by it, although I found certain tasks tedious and a little confusing as we’d only just finished with the very basic modelling tutorials and we were thrown into the deep end. But once It was done in the end, I was impressed with my model and how simple it actually turned out to be when it wasn’t just myself panicking at the littlest of tasks within the unit. Some things I found rather tedious were being thrown into modelling with very basic knowledge and utilities that we were aware on how to use, such as the mirror tool within Lightwave Modeller, it was difficult getting it all centred and easily connected as some of the polygons became non-planar after I made little adjustments.
  • 2. I’m impressed with my work give the experience I had when I designed, modelled and presented my sidekick, I feel I used my design pack to an advantage to be able to make it to how I originally anticipated, with the exception of some new additions to the sidekick to make it seem a little more to spec.