SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 20
Descargar para leer sin conexión
10/16/2010




      4                                               Forecasting                                                                Outline
                                                                                            Global Company Profile: Disney
                                                                                            World
                                                                                            What Is Forecasting?
     PowerPoint presentation to accompany
     Heizer and Render
                                                                                                      Forecasting Time Horizons
                                                                                                      F      ti Ti     H i
     Operations Management, 10e
     Principles of Operations Management, 8e
                                                                                                      The Influence of Product Life Cycle
     PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl                                                                   Types Of Forecasts




© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall          4-1   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall         4-2




                          Outline – Continued                                                       Outline – Continued
                  The Strategic Importance of                                               Forecasting Approaches
                  Forecasting                                                                         Overview of Qualitative Methods
                            Human Resources                                                           Overview of Quantitative Methods
                            Capacity                                                        Time-Series Forecasting
                            Supply Chain Management
                                                                                                      Decomposition of a Time Series
                  Seven Steps in the Forecasting                                                      Naive Approach
                  System


© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall          4-3   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall         4-4




                          Outline – Continued                                                       Outline – Continued
                  Time-Series Forecasting (cont.)                                           Associative Forecasting Methods:
                                                                                            Regression and Correlation
                            Moving Averages
                                                                                            Analysis
                            Exponential Smoothing
                                                                                                      Using Regression Analysis for
                                                                                                          g    g           y
                            Exponential Smoothing with Trend                                          Forecasting
                            Adjustment
                                                                                                      Standard Error of the Estimate
                            Trend Projections
                                                                                                      Correlation Coefficients for
                            Seasonal Variations in Data                                               Regression Lines
                            Cyclical Variations in Data                                               Multiple-Regression Analysis

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall          4-5   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall         4-6




                                                                                                                                                    1
10/16/2010




                          Outline – Continued                                                   Learning Objectives
                  Monitoring and Controlling                               When you complete this chapter you
                  Forecasts                                                should be able to :
                            Adaptive Smoothing                                   1. Understand the three time horizons
                            Focus Forecasting
                            F     F      ti                                         and which models apply for each use
                  Forecasting in the Service Sector                              2. Explain when to use each of the four
                                                                                    qualitative models
                                                                                 3. Apply the naive, moving average,
                                                                                    exponential smoothing, and trend
                                                                                    methods

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall   4-7      © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall    4-8




                          Learning Objectives                                 Forecasting at Disney World
     When you complete this chapter you                                                Global portfolio includes parks in Hong
     should be able to :                                                               Kong, Paris, Tokyo, Orlando, and
                                                                                       Anaheim
           4. Compute three measures of forecast
              accuracy                                                                 Revenues are derived from people – how
                                                                                       many visitors and how they spend their
           5. Develop seasonal indexes                                                 money
           6. Conduct a regression and correlation                                     Daily management report contains only
              analysis                                                                 the forecast and actual attendance at
           7. Use a tracking signal                                                    each park

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall   4-9      © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall    4 - 10




        Forecasting at Disney World                                           Forecasting at Disney World
                 Disney generates daily, weekly, monthly,                             20% of customers come from outside the
                 annual, and 5-year forecasts                                         USA
                 Forecast used by labor management,                                   Economic model includes gross
                 maintenance, operations, finance,
                 maintenance operations finance and                                   domestic product, cross-exchange rates,
                                                                                                 product               rates
                 park scheduling                                                      arrivals into the USA
                 Forecast used to adjust opening times,                               A staff of 35 analysts and 70 field people
                 rides, shows, staffing levels, and guests                            survey 1 million park guests, employees,
                 admitted                                                             and travel professionals each year



© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall   4 - 11   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall    4 - 12




                                                                                                                                             2
10/16/2010




        Forecasting at Disney World                                                                                    What is Forecasting?
                     Inputs to the forecasting model include                                                      Process of predicting
                     airline specials, Federal Reserve                                                            a future event
                     policies, Wall Street trends,
                     vacation/holiday schedules for 3,000
                                                                                                                  Underlying basis
                                                                                                                  of all business
                                                                                                                                                                            ??
                     school districts around the world                                                            decisions
                     Average forecast error for the 5-year                                                              Production
                     forecast is 5%                                                                                     Inventory
                     Average forecast error for annual                                                                  Personnel
                     forecasts is between 0% and 3%                                                                     Facilities

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall              4 - 13   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                         4 - 14




           Forecasting Time Horizons                                                                        Distinguishing Differences
                Short-range forecast
                           Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months                                             Medium/long range forecasts deal with
                           Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce                                                  more comprehensive issues and support
                           levels, job assignments, production levels                                             management decisions regarding
                                                                                                                  planning and products, plants and
                Medium-range forecast
                          g
                                                                                                                  processes
                           3 months to 3 years
                                                                                                                  Short-
                                                                                                                  Short-term forecasting usually employs
                           Sales and production planning, budgeting                                               different methodologies than longer-term
                Long-range forecast                                                                               forecasting
                           3+ years                                                                               Short-
                                                                                                                  Short-term forecasts tend to be more
                           New product planning, facility location,                                               accurate than longer-term forecasts
                           research and development
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall              4 - 15   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                         4 - 16




                Influence of Product Life                                                                                    Product Life Cycle
                         Cycle                                                                                    Introduction             Growth                  Maturity          Decline
                                                                                                                  Best period to       Practical to change    Poor time to         Cost control
           Introduction – Growth – Maturity – Decline                                                             increase market      price or quality       change image,        critical
                                                                                                     egy/Issues




                                                                                                                  share                image                  price, or quality

                                                                                                                  R&D engineering is   Strengthen niche       Competitive costs
                   Introduction and growth require longer                                                         critical                                    become critical
                                                                                                                                                              Defend market
                   forecasts than maturity and decline
                                                                                        Company Strate




                                                                                                                                                              position          Drive-through
                                                                                                                                    Internet search engines                       restaurants
                   As product passes through life cycle,                                                                                    iPods
                                                                                                                                                                                       CD-ROMs
                                                                                                                                                             LCD &
                   forecasts are useful in projecting                                                                               Xbox 360                 plasma TVs
                                                                                                                     Sales
                             Staffing levels                                                                                                  Avatars

                             Inventory levels                                                                                           Boeing 787                                   Analog
                                                                                                                                                                                      TVs
                             Factory capacity                                                                                   Twitter
                                                                                                                                                                                       Figure 2.5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall              4 - 17   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                         4 - 18




                                                                                                                                                                                                             3
10/16/2010




                                    Product Life Cycle                                                                                       Types of Forecasts
                            Introduction            Growth             Maturity         Decline
                            Product design
                            and
                                               Forecasting
                                               critical
                                                                   Standardization    Little product
                                                                                      differentiation
                                                                                                                                 Economic forecasts
                                                                   Fewer product
                            development        Product and         changes, more      Cost                                                  Address business cycle – inflation rate,
                 y/Issues




                            critical           process             minor changes      minimization
                            Frequent           reliability         Optimum            Overcapacity
                                                                                                                                            money supply, housing starts, etc.
                            product and        Competitive         capacity           in the
                            process design     product
                                                   d t                                industry
                                                                                      i d t                                      Technological forecasts
       OM Strategy




                            changes                                Increasing
                                               improvements        stability of       Prune line to
                            Short production   and options         process            eliminate                                             Predict rate of technological progress
                            runs               Increase capacity                      items not
                                                                   Long production
                            High production    Shift toward        runs               returning                                             Impacts development of new products
                            costs              product focus                          good margin
                            Limited models     Enhance
                                                                   Product
                                                                   improvement        Reduce                                     Demand forecasts
                            Attention to       distribution        and cost cutting   capacity
                            quality                                                                                                         Predict sales of existing products and
                                                                                                                                            services
                                                                                          Figure 2.5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                              4 - 19   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall             4 - 20




                             Strategic Importance of                                                                       Seven Steps in Forecasting
                                   Forecasting                                                                          1. Determine the use of the forecast
                                                                                                                        2. Select the items to be forecasted
                               Human Resources – Hiring, training,
                               laying off workers                                                                       3. Determine the time horizon of the
                                                                                                                           forecast
                                                                                                                            o ecast
                               Capacity – C
                               C      it   Capacity shortages can
                                                it h t
                               result in undependable delivery, loss                                                    4. Select the forecasting model(s)
                               of customers, loss of market share                                                       5. Gather the data
                               Supply Chain Management – Good
                               supplier relations and price
                                                                                                                        6. Make the forecast
                               advantages                                                                               7. Validate and implement results

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                              4 - 21   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall             4 - 22




                                          The Realities!                                                                         Forecasting Approaches
                                                                                                                                                       Qualitative Methods
                               Forecasts are seldom perfect
                                                                                                                                       Used when situation is vague
                               Most techniques assume an                                                                               and little data exist
                               underlying stability in the system
                                                                                                                                                   New products
                               Product family and aggregated
                               forecasts are more accurate than                                                                                    New technology
                               individual product forecasts                                                                            Involves intuition, experience
                                                                                                                                                   e.g., forecasting sales on
                                                                                                                                                   Internet
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                              4 - 23   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall             4 - 24




                                                                                                                                                                                                 4
10/16/2010




                Forecasting Approaches                                                       Overview of Qualitative
                                                                                                    Methods
                                    Quantitative Methods
                                                                                  1. Jury of executive opinion
                  Used when situation is ‘stable’ and
                  historical data exist                                                               Pool opinions of high-level experts,
                                                                                                      sometimes augment by statistical
                              Existing products                                                       models
                              Current technology                                  2. Delphi method
                  Involves mathematical techniques                                                    Panel of experts, queried iteratively
                              e.g., forecasting sales of color
                              televisions
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall       4 - 25   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                              4 - 26




                   Overview of Qualitative                                             Jury of Executive Opinion
                          Methods
                                                                                         Involves small group of high-level
                                                                                         experts and managers
        3. Sales force composite
                                                                                         Group estimates demand by working
                            Estimates from individual                                    together
                            salespersons are reviewed for
                              l                 i    df
                            reasonableness, then aggregated                              Combines managerial experience with
                                                                                         statistical models
        4. Consumer Market Survey                                                        Relatively quick
                            Ask the customer                                             ‘Group-think’
                                                                                         disadvantage

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall       4 - 27   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                              4 - 28




                   Sales Force Composite                                                                        Delphi Method
                                                                                    Iterative group
                                                                                                                                                    Decision Makers
                 Each salesperson projects his or                                   process,                                                            (Evaluate
                 her sales                                                          continues until                                                  responses and
                                                                                    consensus is                                                    make decisions)
                 Combined at district and national                                  reached
                 levels                                                                                                                Staff
                                                                                    3 types of                                     (Administering
                 Sales reps know customers’ wants                                   participants                                      survey)

                 Tends to be overly optimistic                                                 Decision makers
                                                                                               Staff                                             Respondents
                                                                                                                                               (People who can
                                                                                               Respondents                                      make valuable
                                                                                                                                                  judgments)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall       4 - 29   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                              4 - 30




                                                                                                                                                                           5
10/16/2010




                                        Consumer Market Survey                                                                   Overview of Quantitative
                                                                                                                                      Approaches
                                        Ask customers about purchasing
                                        plans                                                                            1. Naive approach
                                        What consumers say, and what                                                     2. Moving averages
                                                                                                                                                                              time-series
                                                                                                                                                                              time series
                                        they actually do are often different                                             3. Exponential                                         models
                                        Sometimes difficult to answer                                                       smoothing
                                                                                                                         4. Trend projection
                                                                                                                         5. Linear regression                                 associative
                                                                                                                                                                                model

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                              4 - 31   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                  4 - 32




                                        Time Series Forecasting                                                                 Time Series Components

                                        Set of evenly spaced numerical data
                                           Obtained by observing response                                                             Trend                                   Cyclical
                                           variable at regular time periods
                                        Forecast based only on past values,
                                        no other variables important
                                           Assumes that factors influencing
                                           past and present will continue                                                        Seasonal                                     Random
                                           influence in future

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                              4 - 33   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                  4 - 34




                                        Components of Demand                                                                                   Trend Component
                                                                                           Trend
                                                                                         component                                       Persistent, overall upward or
                                                                                                                                         downward pattern
        Demand for product or service




                                           Seasonal peaks

                                                                                                                                         Changes due to population,
                           o




                                                                                    Actual demand                                        technology, age, culture, etc.
                                                                                                                                         t h l              lt      t
                                                                                         line
                                                                                                                                         Typically several years
                                                                                     Average demand
                                                                                       over 4 years                                      duration
                                                        Random variation
                                               |             |                  |          |
                                               1             2                  3          4
                                                                 Time (years)
                                                                                                Figure 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                              4 - 35   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                  4 - 36




                                                                                                                                                                                                      6
10/16/2010




                       Seasonal Component                                                                                        Cyclical Component
                          Regular pattern of up and
                          down fluctuations                                                                            Repeating up and down movements

                          Due to weather, customs, etc.                                                                Affected by business cycle,
                                                                                                                       political, and economic factors
                          Occurs within a single year
                                                                                                                       Multiple years duration
                                                                           Number of
                                           Period            Length         Seasons                                    Often causal or
                                             Week            Day                  7                                    associative
                                             Month           Week             4-4.5
                                             Month           Day             28-31                                     relationships
                                             Year            Quarter              4
                                             Year            Month              12
                                             Year            Week               52
                                                                                                                                                                    0       5     10     15     20
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                    4 - 37   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                    4 - 38




                         Random Component                                                                                                 Naive Approach
             Erratic, unsystematic, ‘residual’                                                                         Assumes demand in next
             fluctuations                                                                                              period is the same as
                                                                                                                       demand in most recent period
             Due to random variation or unforeseen
             events                                                                                                               e g , Ja ua y sales e e
                                                                                                                                  e.g., If January sa es were 68, t e
                                                                                                                                                                  then
                                                                                                                                  February sales will be 68
             Short duration
                                                                                                                       Sometimes cost effective and
             and nonrepeating
                                                                                                                       efficient
                                                                                                                       Can be good starting point

                                                                M      T    W         T   F
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                    4 - 39   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                    4 - 40




                 Moving Average Method                                                                               Moving Average Example

                  MA is a series of arithmetic means                                                                                             Actual                       3-Month
                                                                                                                    Month                      Shed Sales                  Moving Average
                  Used if little or no trend                                                                     January                                 10
                  Used often for smoothing                                                                              y
                                                                                                                 February                                12
                                                                                                                 March                                   13
                            Provides overall impression of data                                                  April                                   16             (10 + 12 + 13 = 11 2/3
                                                                                                                                                                         10        13)/3
                            over time                                                                            May                                     19             (12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3
                                                                                                                 June                                    23             (13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16
                                                                                                                 July                                    26             (16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3
                                                      ∑ demand in previous n periods
          Moving average =                                          n

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                    4 - 41   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                    4 - 42




                                                                                                                                                                                                              7
10/16/2010




                    Graph of Moving Average                                                                                  Weighted Moving Average
                                                                                         Moving                                      Used when some trend might be
                                                                                        Average
                        30
                        28
                             –
                             –
                                                                                        Forecast                                     present
                                                    Actual
                        26   –
                                                    Sales                                                                                      Older data usually less important
                        24   –
          Shed Sales




                        22
                        20
                             –
                             –
                                                                                                                                     Weights b
                                                                                                                                     W i ht based on experience and
                                                                                                                                                d         i       d
                        18   –                                                                                                       intuition
                        16   –
                        14   –                                                                                                                                                ∑ (weight for period n)
                        12   –                                                                                                     Weighted                                      x (demand in period n)
                        10   –
                                 |        |     |    |       |   |    |     |   |   |    |   |
                                                                                                                                 moving average =                                   ∑ weights
                                 J        F     M    A       M   J    J     A   S   O    N   D


© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                              4 - 43   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                4 - 44




                                               Weights Applied                          Period
                Weighted Moving Last month
                         3      Average                                                                                           Potential Problems With
                                                             2
                                                             1
                                                                                Two months ago
                                                                                Three months ago
                                                                                                                                      Moving Average
                                                             6                  Sum of weights
                                                                                                                                   Increasing n smooths the forecast
                                           Actual                         3-Month Weighted                                         but makes it less sensitive to
       Month                             Shed Sales                        Moving Average
                                                                                                                                   changes
     January                                   10
     February                                  12                                                                                  Do not forecast trends well
     March                                     13
     April                                     16                [(3 x 13 + (2 x 12 + (10
                                                                       13)        12) 10)]/6 = 121/6                               Require extensive historical data
     May                                       19                [(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3
     June                                      23                [(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17
     July                                      26                [(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                              4 - 45   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                4 - 46




                  Moving Average And                                                                                               Exponential Smoothing
                Weighted Moving Average
                                                                                             Weighted                            Form of weighted moving average
                        30 –                                                                  moving
                                                                                             average                                        Weights decline exponentially
                        25 –
                                                                                                                                            Most recent data weighted most
                  and
         Sales dema




                        20 –              Actual
                                          sales                                                                                  Requires smoothing constant (α)
                        15 –
                                                                      Moving                                                                Ranges from 0 to 1
                        10 –                                          average
                                                                                                                                            Subjectively chosen
                         5 –
                                                                                                                                 Involves little record keeping of past
                                     |     |    |     |      |    |   |     |   |   |    |   |
                                 J         F    M     A      M    J   J     A   S   O    N   D
                                                                                                                                 data
   Figure 4.2
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                              4 - 47   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                4 - 48




                                                                                                                                                                                                                    8
10/16/2010




                  Exponential Smoothing                                                                                     Exponential Smoothing
                                                                                                                                  Example
  New forecast = Last period’s forecast
                 + α (Last period’s actual demand                                                                      Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
                      – Last period’s forecast)                                                                        Actual demand = 153
                                                                                                                       Smoothing constant α = .20
                                     Ft = Ft – 1 + α(At – 1 - Ft – 1)

                     where                   Ft = new forecast
                                       Ft – 1 = previous forecast
                                               α = smoothing (or weighting)
                                                   constant (0 ≤ α ≤ 1)

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                       4 - 49   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                           4 - 50




                  Exponential Smoothing                                                                                     Exponential Smoothing
                        Example                                                                                                   Example
            Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs                                                                       Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
            Actual demand = 153                                                                                        Actual demand = 153
            Smoothing constant α = .20                                                                                 Smoothing constant α = .20

                     New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142)                                                                        New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142)
                                                                                                                                            = 142 + 2.2
                                                                                                                                            = 144.2 ≈ 144 cars


© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                       4 - 51   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                           4 - 52




                             Effect of                                                                                             Impact of Different α
                         Smoothing Constants
                                                                                                                       225 –


                                                  Weight Assigned to                                                                                             Actual                         α = .5
                                                                                                                       200 –                                    demand
                                       Most            2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th Most
                                                                                                                  nd
                                                                                                              Deman




                                      Recent
                                      R     t           Recent
                                                        R      t Recent
                                                                 R       t Recent
                                                                           R       t Recent
                                                                                     R       t
             Smoothing                Period            Period    Period    Period   Period
              Constant                  (α)             α(1 - α) α(1 - α)2 α(1 - α)3 α(1 - α)4
                                                                                                                       175 –
                 α = .1                   .1                 .09   .081      .073      .066

                 α = .5                   .5                 .25   .125      .063      .031                                                                                                α = .1
                                                                                                                       150 – |                 |            |           |      |       |    |      |      |
                                                                                                                             1                2            3           4      5       6    7      8      9
                                                                                                                                                                            Quarter

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                       4 - 53   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                           4 - 54




                                                                                                                                                                                                                        9
10/16/2010




                         Impact of Different α                                                                                                                   Choosing α
             225 –
                                                                                                                                 The objective is to obtain the most
                             Actual                                                    α = .5                                    accurate forecast no matter the
               Chose high values of α
             200 –          demand                                                                                               technique
                 when underlying average
        nd
    Deman




                 is likely to change                                                                                             We generally do this by selecting the
             175 –
               Choose low values of α                                                                                            model that gives us the lowest forecast
               when underlying average                                                                                           error
                                                                                  α = .1
               is stable|
             150 – |      |    |   |                                        |      |        |       |
                                                                                                                                 Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value
                        1           2            3           4     5       6      7        8       9
                                                                 Quarter                                                                                             = At - Ft

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                  4 - 55   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     4 - 56




             Common Measures of Error                                                                                         Common Measures of Error

                   Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD)
                                                                                                                                Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)
                                     ∑ |Actual - Forecast|
                               MAD =
                                               n                                                                                                             n
                                                                                                                                                          ∑100|Actuali - Forecasti|/Actuali
                            Mean Squared Error (MSE)                                                                             MAPE =                   i=1
                                                                                                                                                                                       n
                                                     ∑ (Forecast           Errors)2
                               MSE =
                                                              n

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                  4 - 57   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     4 - 58




                 Comparison of Forecast                                                                                               Comparison of Forecast
                         Error                                                                                                                Error
                                               Rounded            Absolute      Rounded         Absolute
                                                                                                                                             ∑ |deviations|
                                                                                                                                                 Rounded  Absolute                           Rounded    Absolute
                        Actual                 Forecast           Deviation     Forecast        Deviation                           MAD =
                                                                                                                                       Actual    Forecast Deviation                          Forecast   Deviation
                       Tonnage                   with                for          with             for                                Tonnage       n
                                                                                                                                                   with      for                               with        for
     Quarter           Unloaded                 α = .10            α = .10       α = .50         α = .50                  Quarter           Unloaded                  α = .10      α = .10    α = .50    α = .50
             1              180                 175                5.00          175             5.00                          1
                                                                                                                                  For α180.10 175
                                                                                                                                        =               5.00                                  175        5.00
             2              168                 175.5              7.50          177.50          9.50                          2       168 = 82.45/8 = 10.31
                                                                                                                                               175.5    7.50                                  177.50     9.50
             3              159                 174.75            15.75          172.75         13.75                          3                 159                 174.75       15.75       172.75    13.75
             4              175                 173.18             1.82          165.88          9.12                          4 For         α175.50 173.18
                                                                                                                                               =               1.82                           165.88     9.12
             5              190                 173.36            16.64          170.44         19.56                          5              190     173.36  16.64                           170.44    19.56
             6              205                 175.02            29.98          180.22         24.78                          6              205 = 98.62/8 = 12.33
                                                                                                                                                      175.02  29.98                           180.22    24.78
             7              180                 178.02             1.98          192.61         12.61                          7                 180                 178.02        1.98       192.61    12.61
             8              182                 178.22             3.78          186.30          4.30                          8                 182                 178.22        3.78       186.30     4.30
                                                                  82.45                         98.62                                                                             82.45                 98.62



© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                  4 - 59   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     4 - 60




                                                                                                                                                                                                                             10
10/16/2010




                 Comparison of Forecast                                                                                     Comparison of Forecast
                         Error2                                                                                                n      Error
                                                                                                                               ∑100|deviation |/actual
               ∑ (forecast errors)                                                                                                                                             i          i
                      Rounded  Absolute                                   Rounded     Absolute                                                            Rounded           Absolute    Rounded     Absolute
       MSE = Actual   Forecast Deviation                                  Forecast    Deviation                   MAPE = i = 1
                                                                                                                       Actual                             Forecast          Deviation   Forecast    Deviation
            Tonnage
                          n
                        with      for                                       with         for                                      Tonnage                   with        n      for         with        for
     Quarter           Unloaded                  α = .10       α = .10     α = .50     α = .50                  Quarter           Unloaded                 α = .10           α = .10     α = .50     α = .50
          1
              For α180.10 175
                    =                5.00                                  175         5.00                          1
                                                                                                                                α=
                                                                                                                            For 180 .10 175      5.00                                    175         5.00
          2        168 1,526.54/8 = 190.82
                    = , 175.5        7.50                                  177.50      9.50                          2          168  = 44.75/8 = 7.50 %
                                                                                                                                        175.5    5.59%                                   177.50      9.50
          3                 159                 174.75        15.75        172.75     13.75                          3                 159                 174.75           15.75        172.75     13.75
          4 For         α175.50 173.18
                          =               1.82                             165.88      9.12                          4          α=
                                                                                                                            For 175 .50 173.18   1.82                                    165.88      9.12
          5              190     173.36  16.64                             170.44     19.56                          5          190     173.36  16.64                                    170.44     19.56
          6               = 1,561.91/8 = 195.24
                         205     175.02  29.98                             180.22     24.78                          6          205  = 54.05/8 = 6.76%
                                                                                                                                        175.02  29.98                                    180.22     24.78
          7                 180                 178.02         1.98        192.61     12.61                          7                 180                 178.02          1.98          192.61     12.61
          8                 182                 178.22         3.78        186.30      4.30                          8                 182                 178.22          3.78          186.30      4.30
                                                              82.45                   98.62                                                                               82.45                     98.62
                                                MAD           10.31                   12.33                                                                MAD            10.31                     12.33
                                                                                                                                                           MSE           190.82                    195.24
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                        4 - 61   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                           4 - 62




                 Comparison of Forecast                                                                            Exponential Smoothing with
                         Error                                                                                         Trend Adjustment
                                               Rounded        Absolute    Rounded     Absolute
                        Actual                 Forecast       Deviation   Forecast    Deviation
                       Tonnage                   with            for        with         for
     Quarter           Unloaded                 α = .10        α = .10     α = .50     α = .50                         When a trend is present, exponential
          1                 180                 175            5.00        175         5.00
                                                                                                                       smoothing must be modified
          2                 168                 175.5          7.50        177.50      9.50
          3                 159                 174.75        15.75        172.75     13.75
          4                 175                 173.18         1.82        165.88      9.12                    Forecast           Exponentially   Exponentially
          5                 190                 173.36        16.64        170.44     19.56                    including (FITt) = smoothed (Ft) + smoothed     (Tt)
          6                 205                 175.02        29.98        180.22     24.78                    trend              forecast        trend
          7                 180                 178.02         1.98        192.61     12.61
          8                 182                 178.22         3.78        186.30      4.30
                                                              82.45                   98.62
                                                MAD           10.31                   12.33
                                                MSE          190.82                  195.24
                                                MAPE         5.59%                   6.76%
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                        4 - 63   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                           4 - 64




        Exponential Smoothing with                                                                                 Exponential Smoothing with
            Trend Adjustment                                                                                       Trend Adjustment Example
                                                                                                                                                                                                    Forecast
                                                                                                                                       Actual                        Smoothed       Smoothed       Including
                                                                                                               Month(t)              Demand (At)                    Forecast, Ft     Trend, Tt     Trend, FITt
                      Ft = α(At - 1) + (1 - α)(Ft - 1 + Tt - 1)                                                   1                     12                              11              2             13.00
                                                                                                                  2                     17
                             Tt = β(Ft - Ft - 1) + (1 - β)Tt - 1                                                  3
                                                                                                                  4
                                                                                                                                        20
                                                                                                                                        19
                                                                                                                  5                     24
                                                                                                                  6                     21
            Step 1: Compute Ft                                                                                    7                     31
            Step 2: Compute Tt                                                                                    8                     28
                                                                                                                  9                     36
            Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt = Ft + Tt                                                        10

                                                                                                            Table 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                        4 - 65   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                           4 - 66




                                                                                                                                                                                                                         11
10/16/2010




        Exponential Smoothing with                                                                                   Exponential Smoothing with
        Trend Adjustment Example                                                                                     Trend Adjustment Example
                                                                          Forecast                                                                                              Forecast
                                  Actual     Smoothed     Smoothed       Including                                                       Actual     Smoothed     Smoothed       Including
    Month(t)                    Demand (At) Forecast, Ft   Trend, Tt     Trend, FITt                             Month(t)              Demand (At) Forecast, Ft   Trend, Tt    Trend, FITt
       1                           12            11            2            13.00                                   1                     12            11            2            13.00
       2                           17                                                                               2                     17           12.80
       3                           20                                                                               3                     20
       4                           19                                                                               4                     19
       5                           24       Step 1: Forecast for Month 2                                            5                     24       Step 2: Trend for Month 2
       6                           21                                                                               6                     21
       7                           31          F2 = αA1 + (1 - α)(F1 + T1)                                          7                     31          T2 = β(F2 - F1) + (1 - β)T1
       8                           28          F2 = (.2)(12) + (1 - .2)(11 + 2)                                     8                     28          T2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 - .4)(2)
       9                           36                                                                               9                     36
      10                                                          = 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units                        10                                                       = .72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units
 Table 4.1                                                                                                    Table 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                          4 - 67   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     4 - 68




        Exponential Smoothing with                                                                                   Exponential Smoothing with
        Trend Adjustment Example                                                                                     Trend Adjustment Example
                                                                       Forecast                                                                                                                    Forecast
                                  Actual     Smoothed    Smoothed      Including                                                         Actual                        Smoothed      Smoothed     Including
    Month(t)                    Demand (At) Forecast, Ft  Trend, Tt   Trend, FITt                                Month(t)              Demand (At)                    Forecast, Ft    Trend, Tt   Trend, FITt
       1                           12           11           2           13.00                                      1                     12                              11             2           13.00
       2                           17          12.80        1.92                                                    2                     17                             12.80          1.92         14.72
       3                           20                                                                               3                     20                             15.18          2.10         17.28
       4                           19                                                                               4                     19                             17.82          2.32         20.14
       5                           24       Step 3: Calculate FIT for Month 2                                       5                     24                             19.91          2.23         22.14
       6                           21                                                                               6                     21                             22.51          2.38         24.89
       7                           31              FIT2 = F2 + T2                                                   7                     31                             24.11          2.07         26.18
       8                           28              FIT2 = 12.8 + 1.92                                               8                     28                             27.14          2.45         29.59
       9                           36                                                                               9                     36                             29.28          2.32         31.60
      10                                                                    = 14.72 units                          10                                                    32.48          2.68         35.16

 Table 4.1                                                                                                    Table 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                          4 - 69   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     4 - 70




        Exponential Smoothing with                                                                                                          Trend Projections
        Trend Adjustment Example
                                                                                                                       Fitting a trend line to historical data points
                             35 –                                                                                      to project into the medium to long-range
                             30 –    Actual demand (At)
                                                                                                                       Linear trends can be found using the least
                      mand




                             25 –                                                                                      squares technique
            Product dem




                             20 –
                                                                                                                                                                     ^
                                                                                                                                                                     y = a + bx
                             15 –
                                                                                                                                  ^
                                                                                                                            where y = computed value of the variable to
                             10 –                                Forecast including trend (FITt)
                                                                     with α = .2 and β = .4                                           be predicted (dependent variable)
                             5 –                                                                                                  a = y-axis intercept
                             0 – |       |        |          |    |    |     |   |   |
                                                                                                                                  b = slope of the regression line
                                 1       2        3          4    5    6     7   8   9
                                                                                                                                  x = the independent variable
                                                                                             Figure 4.3
                                                             Time (month)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                          4 - 71   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     4 - 72




                                                                                                                                                                                                                     12
10/16/2010




                                           Least Squares Method                                                                                                                               Least Squares Method
            Values of Dependent Variable




                                                                                                                                                           Values of Dependent Variable
                                             Actual observation                       Deviation7                                                                                                Actual observation                         Deviation7
                                                  (y-value)                                                                                                                                          (y-value)

                                                                        Deviation5                 Deviation6                                                                                                               Deviation5                   Deviation6

                                                         Deviation3                                                                                                                                          Deviation3        Least squares method
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              minimizes the sum of the
                                                                                 Deviation4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             squared errors (deviations)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Deviation      4



                                           Deviation1                                                                                                                                         Deviation1
                                            (error)               Deviation2                                                                                                                   (error)                Deviation2
                                                                                             ^
                                                                                 Trend line, y = a + bx                                                                                                                                           ^
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Trend line, y = a + bx


                                                                      Time period                               Figure 4.4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Time period                                 Figure 4.4
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                                   4 - 73   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                                                   4 - 74




                                           Least Squares Method                                                                                                                           Least Squares Example
                                                                                                                                                                                                 Time           Electrical Power
                                                                                                                                                 Year                                          Period (x)           Demand                          x2                     xy
     Equations to calculate the regression variables
                                                                                                                                                 2003                                               1                   74                    1                       74
                                                                                                                                                 2004                                               2                   79                    4                      158
                                                                                                                                                 2005                                               3                   80                    9                      240
                                                                 ^
                                                                 y = a + bx                                                                      2006                                               4                   90                   16                      360
                                                                                                                                                 2007                                               5                  105                   25                      525
                                                                                                                                                 2008                                               6                  142                   36                      852
                                                                       Σxy - nxy                                                                 2009                                               7                  122                   49                      854
                                                             b=                                                                                                                               ∑x = 28            ∑y = 692             ∑x2 = 140              ∑xy = 3,063
                                                                       Σx2 - nx2                                                                                                                x=4              y = 98.86

                                                                                                                                                                                                       ∑xy - nxy   3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)
                                                                  a = y - bx                                                                                                                     b=              =                       = 10.54
                                                                                                                                                                                                       ∑x2 - nx2       140 - (7)(42)

                                                                                                                                                                                                 a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                                   4 - 75   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                                                   4 - 76




                                           Least Squares Example                                                                                                                          Least Squares Example
                                              Time          Electrical Power
       Year                                 Period (x)          Demand                        x2                     xy                                                                                                   Trend line,
                                                                                                                                                          160                             –                               ^
       2003       1            74          1                                                                    74                                        150                             –                               y = 56.70 + 10.54x
       2004       2            79          4                                                                   158                                        140                             –
          The trend line is 80
       2005       3                        9                                                                   240
                                                                                                                                                  emand




                                                                                                                                                          130                             –
       2006       4            90         16                                                                   360                                        120                             –
       2007     ^ 5 56 70 + 10 54x
               y = 56.70 10.54x
                              105         25                                                                   525
                                                                                                                                           Power de




                                                                                                                                                          110                             –
       2008       6           142         36                                                                   852                                        100                             –
       2009       7           122         49                                                                   854                                         90                             –
            ∑x = 28      ∑y = 692  ∑x2 = 140                                                           ∑xy = 3,063                                         80                             –
              x=4       y = 98.86                                                                                                                          70                             –
                                                                                                                                                           60                             –
                                                    ∑xy - nxy   3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)
                                              b=              =                       = 10.54                                                              50                             –
                                                    ∑x2 - nx2       140 - (7)(42)                                                                                                               |       |       |       |        |         |          |        |          |
                                                                                                                                                                                              2003    2004    2005    2006     2007      2008       2009     2010       2011
                                              a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70                                                                                                                                            Year
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                                   4 - 77   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                                                   4 - 78




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            13
Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

La actualidad más candente (20)

Heizer om10 ch05-designh good and services
Heizer om10 ch05-designh good and servicesHeizer om10 ch05-designh good and services
Heizer om10 ch05-designh good and services
 
Heizer om10 ch12-inventory
Heizer om10 ch12-inventoryHeizer om10 ch12-inventory
Heizer om10 ch12-inventory
 
Heizer om10 ch13-aggregate planning
Heizer om10 ch13-aggregate planningHeizer om10 ch13-aggregate planning
Heizer om10 ch13-aggregate planning
 
Heizer om10 ch10-work design
Heizer om10 ch10-work designHeizer om10 ch10-work design
Heizer om10 ch10-work design
 
Heizer om10 ch11_s-outsourching
Heizer om10 ch11_s-outsourchingHeizer om10 ch11_s-outsourching
Heizer om10 ch11_s-outsourching
 
Heizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operations
Heizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operationsHeizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operations
Heizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operations
 
Heizer om10 ch11-supply chain
Heizer om10 ch11-supply chainHeizer om10 ch11-supply chain
Heizer om10 ch11-supply chain
 
Heizer om10 ch08-location
Heizer om10 ch08-locationHeizer om10 ch08-location
Heizer om10 ch08-location
 
Heizer om10 ch06-managing quality
Heizer om10 ch06-managing qualityHeizer om10 ch06-managing quality
Heizer om10 ch06-managing quality
 
Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability
Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliabilityHeizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability
Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability
 
Heizer supp 06
Heizer supp 06Heizer supp 06
Heizer supp 06
 
Heizer 17
Heizer 17Heizer 17
Heizer 17
 
Heizer 04
Heizer 04Heizer 04
Heizer 04
 
Heizer 01
Heizer 01Heizer 01
Heizer 01
 
KBACE iRecruitment Webinar
KBACE iRecruitment WebinarKBACE iRecruitment Webinar
KBACE iRecruitment Webinar
 
Heizer 16
Heizer 16Heizer 16
Heizer 16
 
Opti Roadmap
Opti RoadmapOpti Roadmap
Opti Roadmap
 
Heizer 13
Heizer 13Heizer 13
Heizer 13
 
2008-2014 Math
2008-2014 Math 2008-2014 Math
2008-2014 Math
 
Heizer 15
Heizer 15Heizer 15
Heizer 15
 

Similar a Heizer om10 ch04

Demand forecast process and inventory management
Demand forecast process and inventory managementDemand forecast process and inventory management
Demand forecast process and inventory managementAbhishek Kumar
 
1. An Erp Performance Measurement Framework Using A Fuzzy Integral Approach
1. An Erp Performance Measurement Framework Using A Fuzzy Integral Approach1. An Erp Performance Measurement Framework Using A Fuzzy Integral Approach
1. An Erp Performance Measurement Framework Using A Fuzzy Integral ApproachDonovan Mulder
 
Inter Time Series Sales Forecasting
Inter Time Series Sales ForecastingInter Time Series Sales Forecasting
Inter Time Series Sales ForecastingIJASCSE
 
NG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
NG BB 36 Simple Linear RegressionNG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
NG BB 36 Simple Linear RegressionLeanleaders.org
 
NG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
NG BB 36 Simple Linear RegressionNG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
NG BB 36 Simple Linear RegressionLeanleaders.org
 
L9 planning tools and techniques (1)
L9 planning tools and techniques (1)L9 planning tools and techniques (1)
L9 planning tools and techniques (1)kemx10
 
Ipsos Crescendo- A New Qual-Quant Tool- March 2012
Ipsos Crescendo- A New Qual-Quant Tool- March 2012Ipsos Crescendo- A New Qual-Quant Tool- March 2012
Ipsos Crescendo- A New Qual-Quant Tool- March 2012Ipsos Vantis
 
Evaluating Long Term Complex Evaluations 2010
Evaluating Long Term Complex Evaluations 2010Evaluating Long Term Complex Evaluations 2010
Evaluating Long Term Complex Evaluations 2010Donna Smith-Moncrieffe
 
Enhancing learning transfer in the workplace
Enhancing learning transfer in the workplaceEnhancing learning transfer in the workplace
Enhancing learning transfer in the workplaceEd Holton
 
KnowledgeAdvisors 10th Annual Analytics Symposium- Panel: The Role Of The Le...
KnowledgeAdvisors 10th Annual Analytics Symposium-  Panel: The Role Of The Le...KnowledgeAdvisors 10th Annual Analytics Symposium-  Panel: The Role Of The Le...
KnowledgeAdvisors 10th Annual Analytics Symposium- Panel: The Role Of The Le...Anand K. Chandarana
 
Scope and objective of the assignment
Scope and objective of the assignmentScope and objective of the assignment
Scope and objective of the assignmentGourab Chakraborty
 
Forecating dr. sameh mousa
Forecating dr. sameh  mousaForecating dr. sameh  mousa
Forecating dr. sameh mousasammousa
 
Understanding the Growth-Global
Understanding the Growth-GlobalUnderstanding the Growth-Global
Understanding the Growth-Globaldebmithu
 
Tsh scorecard corporate - 2010 11 q4 e
Tsh scorecard   corporate - 2010 11 q4 eTsh scorecard   corporate - 2010 11 q4 e
Tsh scorecard corporate - 2010 11 q4 eDave Bourne
 

Similar a Heizer om10 ch04 (18)

Heizer 04
Heizer 04Heizer 04
Heizer 04
 
Heizer 04
Heizer 04Heizer 04
Heizer 04
 
Demand forecast process and inventory management
Demand forecast process and inventory managementDemand forecast process and inventory management
Demand forecast process and inventory management
 
1. An Erp Performance Measurement Framework Using A Fuzzy Integral Approach
1. An Erp Performance Measurement Framework Using A Fuzzy Integral Approach1. An Erp Performance Measurement Framework Using A Fuzzy Integral Approach
1. An Erp Performance Measurement Framework Using A Fuzzy Integral Approach
 
Inter Time Series Sales Forecasting
Inter Time Series Sales ForecastingInter Time Series Sales Forecasting
Inter Time Series Sales Forecasting
 
NG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
NG BB 36 Simple Linear RegressionNG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
NG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
 
NG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
NG BB 36 Simple Linear RegressionNG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
NG BB 36 Simple Linear Regression
 
L9 planning tools and techniques (1)
L9 planning tools and techniques (1)L9 planning tools and techniques (1)
L9 planning tools and techniques (1)
 
Ipsos Crescendo- A New Qual-Quant Tool- March 2012
Ipsos Crescendo- A New Qual-Quant Tool- March 2012Ipsos Crescendo- A New Qual-Quant Tool- March 2012
Ipsos Crescendo- A New Qual-Quant Tool- March 2012
 
Evaluating Long Term Complex Evaluations 2010
Evaluating Long Term Complex Evaluations 2010Evaluating Long Term Complex Evaluations 2010
Evaluating Long Term Complex Evaluations 2010
 
Enhancing learning transfer in the workplace
Enhancing learning transfer in the workplaceEnhancing learning transfer in the workplace
Enhancing learning transfer in the workplace
 
KnowledgeAdvisors 10th Annual Analytics Symposium- Panel: The Role Of The Le...
KnowledgeAdvisors 10th Annual Analytics Symposium-  Panel: The Role Of The Le...KnowledgeAdvisors 10th Annual Analytics Symposium-  Panel: The Role Of The Le...
KnowledgeAdvisors 10th Annual Analytics Symposium- Panel: The Role Of The Le...
 
Centricity Imaging Analytics Brochure
Centricity Imaging Analytics BrochureCentricity Imaging Analytics Brochure
Centricity Imaging Analytics Brochure
 
Scope and objective of the assignment
Scope and objective of the assignmentScope and objective of the assignment
Scope and objective of the assignment
 
Forecating dr. sameh mousa
Forecating dr. sameh  mousaForecating dr. sameh  mousa
Forecating dr. sameh mousa
 
Understanding the Growth-Global
Understanding the Growth-GlobalUnderstanding the Growth-Global
Understanding the Growth-Global
 
Tsh scorecard corporate - 2010 11 q4 c
Tsh scorecard   corporate - 2010 11 q4 cTsh scorecard   corporate - 2010 11 q4 c
Tsh scorecard corporate - 2010 11 q4 c
 
Tsh scorecard corporate - 2010 11 q4 e
Tsh scorecard   corporate - 2010 11 q4 eTsh scorecard   corporate - 2010 11 q4 e
Tsh scorecard corporate - 2010 11 q4 e
 

Heizer om10 ch04

  • 1. 10/16/2010 4 Forecasting Outline Global Company Profile: Disney World What Is Forecasting? PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Forecasting Time Horizons F ti Ti H i Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8e The Influence of Product Life Cycle PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl Types Of Forecasts © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-2 Outline – Continued Outline – Continued The Strategic Importance of Forecasting Approaches Forecasting Overview of Qualitative Methods Human Resources Overview of Quantitative Methods Capacity Time-Series Forecasting Supply Chain Management Decomposition of a Time Series Seven Steps in the Forecasting Naive Approach System © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-3 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-4 Outline – Continued Outline – Continued Time-Series Forecasting (cont.) Associative Forecasting Methods: Regression and Correlation Moving Averages Analysis Exponential Smoothing Using Regression Analysis for g g y Exponential Smoothing with Trend Forecasting Adjustment Standard Error of the Estimate Trend Projections Correlation Coefficients for Seasonal Variations in Data Regression Lines Cyclical Variations in Data Multiple-Regression Analysis © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-5 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-6 1
  • 2. 10/16/2010 Outline – Continued Learning Objectives Monitoring and Controlling When you complete this chapter you Forecasts should be able to : Adaptive Smoothing 1. Understand the three time horizons Focus Forecasting F F ti and which models apply for each use Forecasting in the Service Sector 2. Explain when to use each of the four qualitative models 3. Apply the naive, moving average, exponential smoothing, and trend methods © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-7 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-8 Learning Objectives Forecasting at Disney World When you complete this chapter you Global portfolio includes parks in Hong should be able to : Kong, Paris, Tokyo, Orlando, and Anaheim 4. Compute three measures of forecast accuracy Revenues are derived from people – how many visitors and how they spend their 5. Develop seasonal indexes money 6. Conduct a regression and correlation Daily management report contains only analysis the forecast and actual attendance at 7. Use a tracking signal each park © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-9 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 10 Forecasting at Disney World Forecasting at Disney World Disney generates daily, weekly, monthly, 20% of customers come from outside the annual, and 5-year forecasts USA Forecast used by labor management, Economic model includes gross maintenance, operations, finance, maintenance operations finance and domestic product, cross-exchange rates, product rates park scheduling arrivals into the USA Forecast used to adjust opening times, A staff of 35 analysts and 70 field people rides, shows, staffing levels, and guests survey 1 million park guests, employees, admitted and travel professionals each year © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 11 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 12 2
  • 3. 10/16/2010 Forecasting at Disney World What is Forecasting? Inputs to the forecasting model include Process of predicting airline specials, Federal Reserve a future event policies, Wall Street trends, vacation/holiday schedules for 3,000 Underlying basis of all business ?? school districts around the world decisions Average forecast error for the 5-year Production forecast is 5% Inventory Average forecast error for annual Personnel forecasts is between 0% and 3% Facilities © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 13 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 14 Forecasting Time Horizons Distinguishing Differences Short-range forecast Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months Medium/long range forecasts deal with Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce more comprehensive issues and support levels, job assignments, production levels management decisions regarding planning and products, plants and Medium-range forecast g processes 3 months to 3 years Short- Short-term forecasting usually employs Sales and production planning, budgeting different methodologies than longer-term Long-range forecast forecasting 3+ years Short- Short-term forecasts tend to be more New product planning, facility location, accurate than longer-term forecasts research and development © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 15 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 16 Influence of Product Life Product Life Cycle Cycle Introduction Growth Maturity Decline Best period to Practical to change Poor time to Cost control Introduction – Growth – Maturity – Decline increase market price or quality change image, critical egy/Issues share image price, or quality R&D engineering is Strengthen niche Competitive costs Introduction and growth require longer critical become critical Defend market forecasts than maturity and decline Company Strate position Drive-through Internet search engines restaurants As product passes through life cycle, iPods CD-ROMs LCD & forecasts are useful in projecting Xbox 360 plasma TVs Sales Staffing levels Avatars Inventory levels Boeing 787 Analog TVs Factory capacity Twitter Figure 2.5 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 17 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 18 3
  • 4. 10/16/2010 Product Life Cycle Types of Forecasts Introduction Growth Maturity Decline Product design and Forecasting critical Standardization Little product differentiation Economic forecasts Fewer product development Product and changes, more Cost Address business cycle – inflation rate, y/Issues critical process minor changes minimization Frequent reliability Optimum Overcapacity money supply, housing starts, etc. product and Competitive capacity in the process design product d t industry i d t Technological forecasts OM Strategy changes Increasing improvements stability of Prune line to Short production and options process eliminate Predict rate of technological progress runs Increase capacity items not Long production High production Shift toward runs returning Impacts development of new products costs product focus good margin Limited models Enhance Product improvement Reduce Demand forecasts Attention to distribution and cost cutting capacity quality Predict sales of existing products and services Figure 2.5 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 19 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 20 Strategic Importance of Seven Steps in Forecasting Forecasting 1. Determine the use of the forecast 2. Select the items to be forecasted Human Resources – Hiring, training, laying off workers 3. Determine the time horizon of the forecast o ecast Capacity – C C it Capacity shortages can it h t result in undependable delivery, loss 4. Select the forecasting model(s) of customers, loss of market share 5. Gather the data Supply Chain Management – Good supplier relations and price 6. Make the forecast advantages 7. Validate and implement results © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 21 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 22 The Realities! Forecasting Approaches Qualitative Methods Forecasts are seldom perfect Used when situation is vague Most techniques assume an and little data exist underlying stability in the system New products Product family and aggregated forecasts are more accurate than New technology individual product forecasts Involves intuition, experience e.g., forecasting sales on Internet © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 23 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 24 4
  • 5. 10/16/2010 Forecasting Approaches Overview of Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods 1. Jury of executive opinion Used when situation is ‘stable’ and historical data exist Pool opinions of high-level experts, sometimes augment by statistical Existing products models Current technology 2. Delphi method Involves mathematical techniques Panel of experts, queried iteratively e.g., forecasting sales of color televisions © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 25 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 26 Overview of Qualitative Jury of Executive Opinion Methods Involves small group of high-level experts and managers 3. Sales force composite Group estimates demand by working Estimates from individual together salespersons are reviewed for l i df reasonableness, then aggregated Combines managerial experience with statistical models 4. Consumer Market Survey Relatively quick Ask the customer ‘Group-think’ disadvantage © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 27 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 28 Sales Force Composite Delphi Method Iterative group Decision Makers Each salesperson projects his or process, (Evaluate her sales continues until responses and consensus is make decisions) Combined at district and national reached levels Staff 3 types of (Administering Sales reps know customers’ wants participants survey) Tends to be overly optimistic Decision makers Staff Respondents (People who can Respondents make valuable judgments) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 29 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 30 5
  • 6. 10/16/2010 Consumer Market Survey Overview of Quantitative Approaches Ask customers about purchasing plans 1. Naive approach What consumers say, and what 2. Moving averages time-series time series they actually do are often different 3. Exponential models Sometimes difficult to answer smoothing 4. Trend projection 5. Linear regression associative model © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 31 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 32 Time Series Forecasting Time Series Components Set of evenly spaced numerical data Obtained by observing response Trend Cyclical variable at regular time periods Forecast based only on past values, no other variables important Assumes that factors influencing past and present will continue Seasonal Random influence in future © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 33 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 34 Components of Demand Trend Component Trend component Persistent, overall upward or downward pattern Demand for product or service Seasonal peaks Changes due to population, o Actual demand technology, age, culture, etc. t h l lt t line Typically several years Average demand over 4 years duration Random variation | | | | 1 2 3 4 Time (years) Figure 4.1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 35 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 36 6
  • 7. 10/16/2010 Seasonal Component Cyclical Component Regular pattern of up and down fluctuations Repeating up and down movements Due to weather, customs, etc. Affected by business cycle, political, and economic factors Occurs within a single year Multiple years duration Number of Period Length Seasons Often causal or Week Day 7 associative Month Week 4-4.5 Month Day 28-31 relationships Year Quarter 4 Year Month 12 Year Week 52 0 5 10 15 20 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 37 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 38 Random Component Naive Approach Erratic, unsystematic, ‘residual’ Assumes demand in next fluctuations period is the same as demand in most recent period Due to random variation or unforeseen events e g , Ja ua y sales e e e.g., If January sa es were 68, t e then February sales will be 68 Short duration Sometimes cost effective and and nonrepeating efficient Can be good starting point M T W T F © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 39 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 40 Moving Average Method Moving Average Example MA is a series of arithmetic means Actual 3-Month Month Shed Sales Moving Average Used if little or no trend January 10 Used often for smoothing y February 12 March 13 Provides overall impression of data April 16 (10 + 12 + 13 = 11 2/3 10 13)/3 over time May 19 (12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3 June 23 (13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16 July 26 (16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3 ∑ demand in previous n periods Moving average = n © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 41 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 42 7
  • 8. 10/16/2010 Graph of Moving Average Weighted Moving Average Moving Used when some trend might be Average 30 28 – – Forecast present Actual 26 – Sales Older data usually less important 24 – Shed Sales 22 20 – – Weights b W i ht based on experience and d i d 18 – intuition 16 – 14 – ∑ (weight for period n) 12 – Weighted x (demand in period n) 10 – | | | | | | | | | | | | moving average = ∑ weights J F M A M J J A S O N D © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 43 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 44 Weights Applied Period Weighted Moving Last month 3 Average Potential Problems With 2 1 Two months ago Three months ago Moving Average 6 Sum of weights Increasing n smooths the forecast Actual 3-Month Weighted but makes it less sensitive to Month Shed Sales Moving Average changes January 10 February 12 Do not forecast trends well March 13 April 16 [(3 x 13 + (2 x 12 + (10 13) 12) 10)]/6 = 121/6 Require extensive historical data May 19 [(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3 June 23 [(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17 July 26 [(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 45 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 46 Moving Average And Exponential Smoothing Weighted Moving Average Weighted Form of weighted moving average 30 – moving average Weights decline exponentially 25 – Most recent data weighted most and Sales dema 20 – Actual sales Requires smoothing constant (α) 15 – Moving Ranges from 0 to 1 10 – average Subjectively chosen 5 – Involves little record keeping of past | | | | | | | | | | | | J F M A M J J A S O N D data Figure 4.2 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 47 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 48 8
  • 9. 10/16/2010 Exponential Smoothing Exponential Smoothing Example New forecast = Last period’s forecast + α (Last period’s actual demand Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs – Last period’s forecast) Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant α = .20 Ft = Ft – 1 + α(At – 1 - Ft – 1) where Ft = new forecast Ft – 1 = previous forecast α = smoothing (or weighting) constant (0 ≤ α ≤ 1) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 49 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 50 Exponential Smoothing Exponential Smoothing Example Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant α = .20 Smoothing constant α = .20 New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142) New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142) = 142 + 2.2 = 144.2 ≈ 144 cars © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 51 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 52 Effect of Impact of Different α Smoothing Constants 225 – Weight Assigned to Actual α = .5 200 – demand Most 2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th Most nd Deman Recent R t Recent R t Recent R t Recent R t Recent R t Smoothing Period Period Period Period Period Constant (α) α(1 - α) α(1 - α)2 α(1 - α)3 α(1 - α)4 175 – α = .1 .1 .09 .081 .073 .066 α = .5 .5 .25 .125 .063 .031 α = .1 150 – | | | | | | | | | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Quarter © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 53 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 54 9
  • 10. 10/16/2010 Impact of Different α Choosing α 225 – The objective is to obtain the most Actual α = .5 accurate forecast no matter the Chose high values of α 200 – demand technique when underlying average nd Deman is likely to change We generally do this by selecting the 175 – Choose low values of α model that gives us the lowest forecast when underlying average error α = .1 is stable| 150 – | | | | | | | | Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Quarter = At - Ft © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 55 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 56 Common Measures of Error Common Measures of Error Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE) ∑ |Actual - Forecast| MAD = n n ∑100|Actuali - Forecasti|/Actuali Mean Squared Error (MSE) MAPE = i=1 n ∑ (Forecast Errors)2 MSE = n © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 57 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 58 Comparison of Forecast Comparison of Forecast Error Error Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute ∑ |deviations| Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation MAD = Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with for with for Tonnage n with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = .10 α = .10 α = .50 α = .50 Quarter Unloaded α = .10 α = .10 α = .50 α = .50 1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00 1 For α180.10 175 = 5.00 175 5.00 2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50 2 168 = 82.45/8 = 10.31 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12 4 For α175.50 173.18 = 1.82 165.88 9.12 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78 6 205 = 98.62/8 = 12.33 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 82.45 98.62 82.45 98.62 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 59 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 60 10
  • 11. 10/16/2010 Comparison of Forecast Comparison of Forecast Error2 n Error ∑100|deviation |/actual ∑ (forecast errors) i i Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute MSE = Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation MAPE = i = 1 Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage n with for with for Tonnage with n for with for Quarter Unloaded α = .10 α = .10 α = .50 α = .50 Quarter Unloaded α = .10 α = .10 α = .50 α = .50 1 For α180.10 175 = 5.00 175 5.00 1 α= For 180 .10 175 5.00 175 5.00 2 168 1,526.54/8 = 190.82 = , 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50 2 168 = 44.75/8 = 7.50 % 175.5 5.59% 177.50 9.50 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 4 For α175.50 173.18 = 1.82 165.88 9.12 4 α= For 175 .50 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 6 = 1,561.91/8 = 195.24 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78 6 205 = 54.05/8 = 6.76% 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 82.45 98.62 82.45 98.62 MAD 10.31 12.33 MAD 10.31 12.33 MSE 190.82 195.24 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 61 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 62 Comparison of Forecast Exponential Smoothing with Error Trend Adjustment Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = .10 α = .10 α = .50 α = .50 When a trend is present, exponential 1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00 smoothing must be modified 2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12 Forecast Exponentially Exponentially 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 including (FITt) = smoothed (Ft) + smoothed (Tt) 6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78 trend forecast trend 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 82.45 98.62 MAD 10.31 12.33 MSE 190.82 195.24 MAPE 5.59% 6.76% © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 63 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 64 Exponential Smoothing with Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Trend Adjustment Example Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt Ft = α(At - 1) + (1 - α)(Ft - 1 + Tt - 1) 1 12 11 2 13.00 2 17 Tt = β(Ft - Ft - 1) + (1 - β)Tt - 1 3 4 20 19 5 24 6 21 Step 1: Compute Ft 7 31 Step 2: Compute Tt 8 28 9 36 Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt = Ft + Tt 10 Table 4.1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 65 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 66 11
  • 12. 10/16/2010 Exponential Smoothing with Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Trend Adjustment Example Forecast Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt 1 12 11 2 13.00 1 12 11 2 13.00 2 17 2 17 12.80 3 20 3 20 4 19 4 19 5 24 Step 1: Forecast for Month 2 5 24 Step 2: Trend for Month 2 6 21 6 21 7 31 F2 = αA1 + (1 - α)(F1 + T1) 7 31 T2 = β(F2 - F1) + (1 - β)T1 8 28 F2 = (.2)(12) + (1 - .2)(11 + 2) 8 28 T2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 - .4)(2) 9 36 9 36 10 = 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units 10 = .72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units Table 4.1 Table 4.1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 67 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 68 Exponential Smoothing with Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Trend Adjustment Example Forecast Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt 1 12 11 2 13.00 1 12 11 2 13.00 2 17 12.80 1.92 2 17 12.80 1.92 14.72 3 20 3 20 15.18 2.10 17.28 4 19 4 19 17.82 2.32 20.14 5 24 Step 3: Calculate FIT for Month 2 5 24 19.91 2.23 22.14 6 21 6 21 22.51 2.38 24.89 7 31 FIT2 = F2 + T2 7 31 24.11 2.07 26.18 8 28 FIT2 = 12.8 + 1.92 8 28 27.14 2.45 29.59 9 36 9 36 29.28 2.32 31.60 10 = 14.72 units 10 32.48 2.68 35.16 Table 4.1 Table 4.1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 69 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 70 Exponential Smoothing with Trend Projections Trend Adjustment Example Fitting a trend line to historical data points 35 – to project into the medium to long-range 30 – Actual demand (At) Linear trends can be found using the least mand 25 – squares technique Product dem 20 – ^ y = a + bx 15 – ^ where y = computed value of the variable to 10 – Forecast including trend (FITt) with α = .2 and β = .4 be predicted (dependent variable) 5 – a = y-axis intercept 0 – | | | | | | | | | b = slope of the regression line 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 x = the independent variable Figure 4.3 Time (month) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 71 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 72 12
  • 13. 10/16/2010 Least Squares Method Least Squares Method Values of Dependent Variable Values of Dependent Variable Actual observation Deviation7 Actual observation Deviation7 (y-value) (y-value) Deviation5 Deviation6 Deviation5 Deviation6 Deviation3 Deviation3 Least squares method minimizes the sum of the Deviation4 squared errors (deviations) Deviation 4 Deviation1 Deviation1 (error) Deviation2 (error) Deviation2 ^ Trend line, y = a + bx ^ Trend line, y = a + bx Time period Figure 4.4 Time period Figure 4.4 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 73 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 74 Least Squares Method Least Squares Example Time Electrical Power Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy Equations to calculate the regression variables 2003 1 74 1 74 2004 2 79 4 158 2005 3 80 9 240 ^ y = a + bx 2006 4 90 16 360 2007 5 105 25 525 2008 6 142 36 852 Σxy - nxy 2009 7 122 49 854 b= ∑x = 28 ∑y = 692 ∑x2 = 140 ∑xy = 3,063 Σx2 - nx2 x=4 y = 98.86 ∑xy - nxy 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86) a = y - bx b= = = 10.54 ∑x2 - nx2 140 - (7)(42) a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 75 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 76 Least Squares Example Least Squares Example Time Electrical Power Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy Trend line, 160 – ^ 2003 1 74 1 74 150 – y = 56.70 + 10.54x 2004 2 79 4 158 140 – The trend line is 80 2005 3 9 240 emand 130 – 2006 4 90 16 360 120 – 2007 ^ 5 56 70 + 10 54x y = 56.70 10.54x 105 25 525 Power de 110 – 2008 6 142 36 852 100 – 2009 7 122 49 854 90 – ∑x = 28 ∑y = 692 ∑x2 = 140 ∑xy = 3,063 80 – x=4 y = 98.86 70 – 60 – ∑xy - nxy 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86) b= = = 10.54 50 – ∑x2 - nx2 140 - (7)(42) | | | | | | | | | 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70 Year © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 77 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 78 13