SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 14
Descargar para leer sin conexión
10/16/2010




                                     Managing Quality                                                                             Outline
             6                                                                                   Global Company Profile: Arnold
                                                                                                 Palmer Hospital
                                                                                                 Quality and Strategy

   PowerPoint presentation to accompany
                                                                                                 Defining Quality
                                                                                                        gQ      y
   Heizer and Render
   Operations Management, 10e
                                                                                                            Implications of Quality
   Principles of Operations Management, 8e
                                                                                                            Malcolm Baldrige National Quality
   PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl                                                                           Award
                                                                                                            Cost of Quality (COQ)
                                                                                                            Ethics and Quality Management
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall            6-1   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall           6-2




                          Outline – Continued                                                         Outline – Continued

                       International Quality Standards                                                   Total Quality Management
                                 ISO 9000                                                                           Continuous Improvement

                                 ISO14000                                                                           Six Sigma
                                                                                                                    Employee Empowerment
                                                                                                                    Benchmarking
                                                                                                                    Just-in-Time (JIT)
                                                                                                                    Taguchi Concepts
                                                                                                                    Knowledge of TQM Tools
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall            6-3   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall           6-4




                          Outline – Continued                                                         Outline – Continued
                       Tools of TQM                                                               The Role of Inspection
                                  Check Sheets                                                               When and Where to Inspect
                                  Scatter Diagrams                                                                     p
                                                                                                             Source Inspection
                                  Cause-and-Effect Diagrams                                                  Service Industry Inspection
                                  Pareto Charts                                                              Inspection of Attributes versus
                                  Flowcharts                                                                 Variables
                                  Histograms                                                      TQM in Services
                                  Statistical Process Control (SPC)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall            6-5   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall           6-6




                                                                                                                                                        1
10/16/2010




                          Learning Objectives                                                Managing Quality Provides a
       When you complete this chapter you                                                      Competitive Advantage
       should be able to:
                                                                                                                        Arnold Palmer Hospital
                  1. Define quality and TQM
                  2. Describe the ISO international                                                         Deliver over 16,000 babies annually
                     quality standards                                                                      Virtually every type of quality tool is
                  3. Explain Six Sigma                                                                      employed
                  4. Explain how benchmarking is used                                                                 Continuous improvement
                                                                                                                      Employee empowerment
                  5. Explain quality robust products and
                     Taguchi concepts                                                                                 Benchmarking
                                                                                                                      Just-in-time
                  6. Use the seven tools of TQM
                                                                                                                      Quality tools
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                    6-7      © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                      6-8




                         Quality and Strategy                                                                   Quality and Strategy

              An operations manager’s objective                                                           Managing quality supports
                   is to build a total quality                                                            differentiation, low cost, and
              management system that identifies
                   g         y                                                                            response strategies
                and satisfies customer needs                                                              Quality helps firms increase
                                                                                                          sales and reduce costs
                                                                                                          Building a quality organization is
                                                                                                          a demanding task


© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                    6-9      © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                      6 - 10




                         Two Ways Quality                                                                         The Flow of Activities
                       Improves Profitability                                            Organizational Practices
                                                                                                  Leadership, Mission statement, Effective operating
                                     Sales Gains via                                              procedures, Staff support, Training
                                                                                                  Yields: What is important and what is to be
                                     Improved response                                                    accomplished
                                                                                              Quality Principles
                                     Flexible pricing                                                   Customer focus, Continuous improvement, Benchmarking,
                                                                                                        Just-in-time,
                                                                                                        Just in time Tools of TQM
                                     Improved reputation                                                Yields: How to do what is important and to be
  Improved                                                          Increased                                    accomplished
   Quality                                                            Profits                                      Employee Fulfillment
                                     Reduced Costs via
                                                                                                                           Empowerment, Organizational commitment
                                     Increased productivity                                                                Yields: Employee attitudes that can accomplish
                                                                                                                                    what is important
                                     Lower rework and scrap costs                                                                          Customer Satisfaction
                                                                                                                                                   Winning orders, Repeat customers
                                     Lower warranty costs                                                                                          Yields: An effective organization with
                                                                                         Figure 6.2                                                        a competitive advantage
                                                                      Figure 6.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                    6 - 11   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                      6 - 12




                                                                                                                                                                                                2
10/16/2010




                                   Defining Quality                                                                                       Different Views
                                                                                                                         User-based
                                                                                                                         User-based: better performance,
                                                                                                                         more features
                    The totality of features and
                  characteristics of a product or                                                                        Manufacturing-based
                                                                                                                         Manufacturing-based:
                 service that bears on its ability to                                                                    conformance t standards,
                                                                                                                            f          to t d d
                  satisfy stated or implied needs                                                                        making it right the first time
                                                                                                                         Product-based
                                                                                                                         Product-based: specific and
                                                             American Society for Quality
                                                                                                                         measurable attributes of the
                                                                                                                         product

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                  6 - 13   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                       6 - 14




                     Implications of Quality                                                                     Key Dimensions of Quality
                1. Company reputation
                                   Perception of new products                                                        Performance                                  Durability
                                   Employment practices                                                              Features                                     Serviceability
                                   Supplier relations
                                                                                                                     Reliability                                  Aesthetics
                2. Product liability
                                                                                                                     Conformance                                  Perceived quality
                                   Reduce risk
                                                                                                                                                                  Value
                3. Global implications
                                   Improved ability to compete
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                  6 - 15   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                       6 - 16




            Malcolm Baldrige National                                                                                                  Baldrige Criteria
                 Quality Award
                                                                                                             Applicants are evaluated on:
                Established in 1988 by the U.S.                                                                      Categories                                           Points
                government
                                                                                                                     Leadership                                             120
                Designed to promote TQM practices                                                                    Strategic Planning                                       85
                Recent winners include                                                                               Customer & Market Focus                                  85
                          Honeywell Federal, Midway USA,                                                             Measurement, Analysis, and
                          AtlantiCare, Heartland Health, Cargill                                                     Knowledge Management                                       90
                          Corn Milling, PRO-TEC Coating Co.,                                                         Workforce Focus                                            85
                          City of Coral Springs, Premier Inc.,
                                                                                                                     Process Management                                         85
                          Sunny Fresh Foods, Park Place
                          Lexus, Richland College                                                                    Results                                                   450
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                  6 - 17   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                       6 - 18




                                                                                                                                                                                               3
10/16/2010




                                                      Takumi                                                            Costs of Quality

        A Japanese character                                                                         Prevention costs - reducing the
        that symbolizes a                                                                            potential for defects
        broader dimension                                                                            Appraisal costs - evaluating
        than quality, a deeper                                                                       products, parts, and services
        process than
                                                                                                     Internal failure - producing defective
        education, and a more
                                                                                                     parts or service before delivery
        perfect method than
        persistence                                                                                  External costs - defects discovered
                                                                                                     after delivery
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                  6 - 19   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                6 - 20




                                   Costs of Quality                                                                Leaders in Quality
                                                                                        Leader                                                    Philosophy/Contribution
         Total                                                 Total Cost               W. Edwards Deming                                         14 Points for
         Cost                                                                                                                                     Management
                                 External Failure
                                                                                        Joseph M. Juran
                                                                                            p                                                     Top management
                                                                                                                                                    p     g
                                                                                                                                                  commitment, fitness for
                              Internal Failure                                                                                                    use
                                                                                        Armand Feigenbaum                                         Total Quality Control
                                       Prevention
                                                                                        Philip B. Crosby                                          Quality is Free, zero
                                 Appraisal                                                                                                        defects
                                              Quality Improvement
                                                                                                                                                                  Table 6.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                  6 - 21   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                6 - 22




                              Ethics and Quality                                                              International Quality
                                 Management                                                                        Standards
                        Operations managers must deliver
                        healthy, safe, quality products and                                             ISO 9000 series (Europe/EC)
                        services                                                                                   Common quality standards for products
                                                                                                                   sold in Europe (even if made in U.S.)
                                                                                                                                                   US)
                        Poor quality risks injuries, lawsuits,
                        recalls, and regulation                                                                    2008 update places greater emphasis on
                                                                                                                   leadership and customer requirements
                        Organizations are judged by how                                                            and satisfaction
                        they respond to problems                                                        ISO 14000 series (Europe/EC)
                        All stakeholders much be
                        considered
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                  6 - 23   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                6 - 24




                                                                                                                                                                                        4
10/16/2010




                       ISO 14000                                                                               ISO 14000
                 Environmental Standard                                                                  Environmental Standard
        Core Elements:                                                                          Advantages:
                                                                                                                Positive public image and reduced
                                   Environmental management
                                                     g                                                          exposure to liability
                                                                                                                  p                 y
                                   Auditing                                                                     Systematic approach to pollution
                                   Performance evaluation                                                       prevention
                                   Labeling                                                                     Compliance with regulatory
                                                                                                                requirements and opportunities for
                                   Life cycle assessment                                                        competitive advantage
                                                                                                                Reduction in multiple audits
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                     6 - 25   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                6 - 26




                                                             TQM                                     Deming’s Fourteen Points
                                                                                                    1. Create consistency of purpose
                Encompasses entire organization,                                                    2. Lead to promote change
                    from supplier to customer
                                                                                                    3. Build quality into the product; stop
                 Stresses a commitment by   y                                                          depe d g o
                                                                                                       depending on inspections
                                                                                                                        spect o s
              management to have a continuing,                                                      4. Build long-term relationships based on
                  companywide drive toward                                                             performance instead of awarding
             excellence in all aspects of products                                                     business on price
             and services that are important to the                                                 5. Continuously improve product, quality,
                           customer                                                                    and service

                                                                                                                                                     Table 6.2
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                     6 - 27   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                6 - 28




             Deming’s Fourteen Points                                                                Deming’s Fourteen Points
            6. Start training                                                                       12. Remove barriers to pride in work
            7. Emphasize leadership                                                                 13. Institute education and self-
            8. Drive out fear                                                                           improvement
            9. Break d
            9 B    k down b i
                          barriers between
                                   b t                                                              14. Put everyone to work on the
               departments                                                                              transformation
            10. Stop haranguing workers
            11. Support, help, and improve


                                                                   Table 6.2                                                                         Table 6.2
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                     6 - 29   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                6 - 30




                                                                                                                                                                           5
10/16/2010




                 Seven Concepts of TQM                                                                        Continuous Improvement
                      1.        Continuous improvement
                      2.        Six Sigma                                                                       Represents continual
                                                                                                                improvement of all processes
                      3.        Employee empowerment
                      4.        Benchmarking                                                                    Involves all operations and work
                                                                                                                centers including suppliers and
                      5.        Just-in-time (JIT)
                                                                                                                customers
                      6.        Taguchi concepts
                                                                                                                          People, Equipment, Materials,
                      7.        Knowledge of TQM tools                                                                    Procedures

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                             6 - 31   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall           6 - 32




                 Shewhart’s PDCA Model                                                                                                          Six Sigma

                                            4. Act     1.Plan
                                                                                                               Two meanings
                                          Implement Identify the                                                         Statistical definition of a process that
                                           the plan pattern and                                                          is 99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per
                                          document make a plan
                                                                                                                         million opportunities (DPMO)
                                                                                                                         A program designed to reduce
                                          3. Check            2. Do                                                      defects, lower costs, and improve
                                         Is the plan         Test the                                                    customer satisfaction
                                          working?             plan


                                                                              Figure 6.3

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                             6 - 33   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall           6 - 34




                                                Six Sigma                                                                   Six Sigma Program
                                              Lower limits              Upper limits
               Two meanings                                                                                     Originally developed by Motorola,
                    2,700 defects/million
                                                                                                                adopted and enhanced by
                         Statistical definition of a process that                                               Honeywell and GE
                   3.4 defects/million
                         is 99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per
                         million opportunities (DPMO)                                                           Highly structured approach to
                         A program designed to reduce                                                           process improvement
                         defects, lower costs, Mean improve
                                               and                                                                         A strategy
                         customer satisfaction

                Figure 6.4
                                                                 ±3σ
                                                                 ±6σ
                                                                                                                           A discipline - DMAIC
                                                                                                                                                             6σ
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                             6 - 35   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall           6 - 36




                                                                                                                                                                              6
10/16/2010




                                                Six Sigma                                       Six Sigma Implementation
    1. Define critical outputs                                                                     Emphasize defects per million
       and identify gaps for                                                                       opportunities as a standard metric
       improvement                                           DMAIC Approach
                                                                                                   Provide extensive training
    2. Measure the work and
       collect process data                                                                        Focus on corporate sponsor support
                                                                                                   (Champions)
    3. Analyze the data
                                                                                                   Create qualified process improvement
    4. Improve the process                                                                         experts (Black Belts, Green Belts, etc.)
    5. Control the new process to                                                                  Set stretch objectives
       make sure new performance                                                                   This cannot be accomplished without a major
       is maintained                                                                                 commitment from top level management

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                6 - 37   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                               6 - 38




               Employee Empowerment                                                                                      Quality Circles
               Getting employees involved in product
               and process improvements                                                                 Group of employees who meet
                         85% of quality problems are due                                                regularly to solve problems
                         to process and material
                                                                                                        Trained in planning, problem
               Techniques                                                                               solving, and statistical methods
                                                                                                          l i      d t ti ti l     th d
                         Build communication networks
                         that include employees                                                         Often led by a facilitator
                         Develop open, supportive supervisors                                           Very effective when done
                         Move responsibility to employees                                               properly
                         Build a high-morale organization
                         Create formal team structures
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                6 - 39   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                               6 - 40




                                      Benchmarking                                        Best Practices for Resolving
       Selecting best practices to use as a                                                  Customer Complaints
       standard for performance
                                                                                           Best Practice                                        Justification
             1. Determine what to                                                          Make it easy for clients                             It is free market research
                benchmark                                                                  to complain
                                                                                           Respond quickly to                                   It adds customers and loyalty
             2. Form a benchmark team                                                      complaints
                                                                                           Resolve complaints on                                It reduces cost
             3. Identify benchmarking partners                                             first contact
             4. Collect and analyze benchmarking                                           Use computers to                                     Discover trends, share them, and align
                                                                                           manage complaints                                    your services
                information
                                                                                           Recruit the best for                                 It should be part of formal training and
             5. Take action to match or exceed the                                         customer service jobs                                career advancement
                benchmark                                                                                                                                                       Table 6.3
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                6 - 41   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                               6 - 42




                                                                                                                                                                                                     7
10/16/2010




                                Just-in-
                                Just-in-Time (JIT)                                                                       Just-in-
                                                                                                                         Just-in-Time (JIT)

        Relationship to quality:                                                                           ‘Pull’ system of production scheduling
                                                                                                           including supply management
                       JIT cuts the cost of quality                                                                  Production only when signaled
                       JIT i
                           improves quality
                                       lit                                                                 Allows reduced inventory levels
                       Better quality means less                                                                     Inventory costs money and hides process
                       inventory and better, easier-to-                                                              and material problems
                       employ JIT system                                                                   Encourages improved process and
                                                                                                           product quality


© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                      6 - 43   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                 6 - 44




           Just-In-
           Just-In-Time (JIT) Example                                                               Just-In-
                                                                                                    Just-In-Time (JIT) Example
                                                                                                        Reducing inventory reveals
                                                                                                        problems so they can be solved

                                                             Work in process
                                                              inventory level
                                                             (hides problems)


                Unreliable                                          Capacity                             Unreliable                                    Capacity
                 Vendors                             Scrap                                                Vendors                             Scrap
                                                                   Imbalances                                                                         Imbalances

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                      6 - 45   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                 6 - 46




                              Taguchi Concepts                                                                      Quality Robustness
                Engineering and experimental
                design methods to improve product                                                          Ability to produce products
                and process design                                                                         uniformly in adverse manufacturing
                           Identify key component and process                                              and environmental conditions
                           variables affecting product variation
                              i bl    ff ti       d t     i ti                                                       Remove the effects of adverse
                Taguchi Concepts                                                                                     conditions
                           Quality robustness                                                                        Small variations in materials and
                                                                                                                     process do not destroy product
                           Quality loss function                                                                     quality
                           Target-oriented quality
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                      6 - 47   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                 6 - 48




                                                                                                                                                                             8
10/16/2010




                     Quality Loss Function                                                                                    Quality Loss Function
                    Shows that costs increase as the                                                                  High loss                                                             L = D2C
                                                                                                                                                               Unacceptable          where
                    product moves away from what                                                              Loss (to
                                                                                                              producing                                           Poor
                                                                                                                                                                                        L = loss to society
                                                                                                                                                                                        D = distance from
                    the customer wants                                                                        organization,
                                                                                                              customer,                                            Fair                     target value
                                                                                                              and society)                                        Good                  C = cost of deviation
                    Costs include customer                                                                             Low loss
                                                                                                                                                                  Best
                                                                                                                                                                                     Target-oriented quality
                                                                                                                                                                                     T     t i t d       lit
                    dissatisfaction, warranty                                                                                                                                        yields more product in
                                                                                                                                                                                     the “best” category
                    and service, internal                                                                                                                                            Target-oriented quality
                    scrap and repair, and costs to                                                                  Frequency
                                                                                                                                                                                     brings product toward
                                                                                                                                                                                     the target value
                    society                                                                                                                                                          Conformance-oriented
                                                                                                                                                                                     quality keeps products
                                                                                                                                                                                     within 3 standard
                    Traditional conformance                                                                                                                                          deviations
                                                                                                                                                       Lower     Target      Upper
                    specifications are too simplistic                                                                                                          Specification                   Figure 6.5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                      6 - 49   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                             6 - 50




                                         Tools of TQM                                                                                                   Tools of TQM
                            Tools for Generating Ideas                                                                           Tools for Identifying Problems
                                       Check sheets                                                                                              Histogram
                                       Scatter diagrams                                                                                          Statistical process control chart
                                       Cause-and-effect diagrams
                            Tools to Organize the Data
                                       Pareto charts
                                       Flowcharts


© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                      6 - 51   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                             6 - 52




                          Seven Tools of TQM                                                                                       Seven Tools of TQM
        (a) Check Sheet: An organized method of                                                                  (b) Scatter Diagram: A graph of the value
            recording data                                                                                           of one variable vs. another variable

                                                                 Hour
                  Defect
                  D f t                   1           2      3   4   5   6   7       8
                                                                                                                                        Productivity




                    A                     ///         /          /   /   /   ///     /
                        B                  //         /      /   /           //     ///
                        C                  /          //                     //     ////

                                                                                                                                                                      Absenteeism

                                                                                   Figure 6.6                                                                                                      Figure 6.6
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                      6 - 53   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                             6 - 54




                                                                                                                                                                                                                         9
10/16/2010




                          Seven Tools of TQM                                                                                              Seven Tools of TQM
        (c) Cause-and-Effect Diagram: A tool that                                                                       (d) Pareto Chart: A graph to identify and plot
            identifies process elements (causes) that                                                                       problems or defects in descending order of
            might effect an outcome                                                                                         frequency

                                                Cause
                                   Materials                 Methods




                                                                                                                                               Frequency
                                                                            Effect




                                                                                                                                                                                                               Percent
                                    Manpower                   Machinery                                                                                        A      B      C      D      E
                                                                                          Figure 6.6                                                                                                                       Figure 6.6
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                             6 - 55   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                              6 - 56




                          Seven Tools of TQM                                                                                              Seven Tools of TQM
        (e) Flowchart (Process Diagram): A chart that                                                                   (f) Histogram: A distribution showing the
            describes the steps in a process                                                                                frequency of occurrences of a variable
                                                                                                                                                                              Distribution
                                                                                                                                                    Frequency




                                                                                                                                                                       Repair time (minutes)
                                                                                          Figure 6.6                                                                                                                       Figure 6.6
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                             6 - 57   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                              6 - 58




                          Seven Tools of TQM                                                                              Cause-and-
                                                                                                                          Cause-and-Effect Diagrams
        (g) Statistical Process Control Chart: A chart with                                                            Material                                                   Method
                                                                                                                        (ball)                                               (shooting process)
            time on the horizontal axis to plot values of a                                                                                          Grain/Feel                                 Aiming point
            statistic                                                                                                                                  (grip)
                                                                                                                       Size of ball
                                                                                                                                                                    Air pressure                          Bend knees
                                                                                                                                                                                    Hand position
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Balance
                                                                                                                                        Lopsidedness
                                                                                                                                        L   id d
                                                                                                                                                                                         Follow-through
                                                                           Upper control limit                                                                                                                           Missed
                                                                                                                                            Training
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         free-throws
                                                                                                                                                                                            Rim size
                                                                           Target value
                                                                                                                                  Conditioning                             Motivation                       Rim height
                                                                           Lower control limit                                                                                                      Backboard
                                                                                                                        Consistency                                         Rim alignment
                                                                                                                                                                                                     stability
                                                                                                                                                 Concentration

                                                               Time                                                                                                                 Machine
                                                                                                                       Manpower
                                                                                                                                                                                    (hoop &                                Figure 6.7
                                                                                          Figure 6.6                   (shooter)
                                                                                                                                                                                   backboard)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                             6 - 59   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                              6 - 60




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 10
10/16/2010




                                            Pareto Charts                                                                                                                      Flow Charts
                                                       Data for October
                                                                                            – 100
                                                                                                                                          MRI Flowchart
                              70 –                                                          – 93
                                                                                            – 88                                         1.      Physician schedules MRI                               7.  If unsatisfactory, repeat
                              60 –                                                                                                       2.      Patient taken to MRI                                  8.  Patient taken back to room
                                       54
         Frequency (number)




                                                                                                                 rcent
                                                                                            – 72                                         3.      Patient signs in                                      9.  MRI read by radiologist
                              50 –
                                                                                                                                         4.      Patient is prepped
                                                                                                                                                            p pp                                       10. MRI report transferred to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  p




                                                                                                    Cumulative per
                              40 –                                                                                                       5.      Technician carries out MRI                                physician
                                                                       Number of                                                         6.      Technician inspects film                              11. Patient and physician discuss
                              30 –
                                                                      occurrences
                              20 –
                                                  12
                              10 –                                                                                                                                                                                           8
                                                              4           3          2                                                                                                                               80%
                               0 –                                                                                                      1            2            3             4              5        6        7                            11
                                     Room svc   Check-in Pool hours    Minibar      Misc.                                                                                                                                    9       10
                                       72%        16%       5%           4%          3%
                                                                                                                                                                                                       20%
                                                Causes and percent of the total

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                               6 - 61   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                   6 - 62




                      Statistical Process Control                                                                                                                         An SPC Chart
                                  (SPC)
                                                                                                                                                                                         Plots the percent of free throws missed
                                Uses statistics and control charts to
                                tell when to take corrective action                                                                    20%                                                                           Upper control limit
                                Drives process improvement
                                       p         p
                                Four key steps                                                                                         10%                                                                           Coach’s target value
                                       Measure the process
                                       When a change is indicated, find the                                                              0%        |       |       |       |        |     |        |   |     |
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Lower control limit
                                       assignable cause                                                                                            1       2       3       4        5     6        7   8     9
                                       Eliminate or incorporate the cause                                                                                              Game number
                                       Restart the revised process                                                                                                                                                               Figure 6.8
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                               6 - 63   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                   6 - 64




                                                 Inspection                                                                                 When and Where to Inspect
                                Involves examining items to see if                                                                      1. At the supplier’s plant while the supplier is
                                an item is good or defective                                                                               producing
                                                                                                                                        2. At your facility upon receipt of goods from
                                Detect a defective product                                                                                 the supplier
                                       Does not correct deficiencies in                                                                 3. Before costly or irreversible processes
                                       process or product
                                                                                                                                        4. During the step-by-step production
                                       It is expensive                                                                                     process
                                Issues                                                                                                  5. When production or service is complete
                                       When to inspect                                                                                  6. Before delivery to your customer
                                       Where in process to inspect                                                                      7. At the point of customer contact
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                               6 - 65   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                                   6 - 66




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        11
10/16/2010




                                               Inspection                                                                             Source Inspection
                    Many problems
                              Worker fatigue                                                                                Also known as source control
                              Measurement error                                                                             The next step in the process is
                              Process variability                                                                           your customer
                    Cannot inspect quality into a                                                                           Ensure perfect product
                    product                                                                                                 to your customer
                    Robust design, empowered
                                                                                                                       Poka-yoke is the concept of foolproof devices
                    employees, and sound processes                                                                         or techniques designed to pass only
                    are better solutions                                                                                            acceptable product

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     6 - 67   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     6 - 68




          Service Industry Inspection                                                                             Service Industry Inspection

                                                   What is                                                                                                 What is
             Organization                                              Standard                                      Organization                                              Standard
                                                  Inspected                                                                                               Inspected
        Jones Law Office Receptionist                         Is phone answered by the                          Hard Rock Hotel                       Reception       Use customer’s name
                         performance                          second ring                                                                             desk
                                              Billing
                                              Billi           Accurate, timely, and
                                                              A          i l      d                                                                   Doorman
                                                                                                                                                      D               Greet guest in less than 30
                                                                                                                                                                      G           i l      h
                                                              correct format                                                                                          seconds
                                              Attorney        Promptness in returning                                                                 Room            All lights working, spotless
                                                              calls                                                                                                   bathroom
                                                                                                                                                      Minibar         Restocked and charges
                                                                                                                                                                      accurately posted to bill



                                                                                   Table 6.4                                                                                               Table 6.4
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     6 - 69   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     6 - 70




          Service Industry Inspection                                                                             Service Industry Inspection

                                                   What is                                                                                                 What is
             Organization                                              Standard                                      Organization                                              Standard
                                                  Inspected                                                                                               Inspected
        Arnold Palmer                          Billing        Accurate, timely, and                             Olive Garden                          Busboy          Serves water and bread
        Hospital                                              correct format                                    Restaurant                                            within 1 minute
                                               Pharmacy
                                               Ph             Prescription accuracy,
                                                              P     i i                                                                               Busboy
                                                                                                                                                      B b             Clears all entrée items and
                                                                                                                                                                      Cl      ll     é i        d
                                                              inventory accuracy                                                                                      crumbs prior to dessert
                                               Lab            Audit for lab-test accuracy                                                             Waiter          Knows and suggest
                                               Nurses         Charts immediately                                                                                      specials, desserts
                                                              updated
                                               Admissions     Data entered correctly and
                                                              completely

                                                                                   Table 6.4                                                                                               Table 6.4
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     6 - 71   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     6 - 72




                                                                                                                                                                                                                12
10/16/2010




          Service Industry Inspection                                                                             Attributes Versus Variables
                                                                                                                              Attributes
                                                   What is
             Organization                                              Standard                                                          Items are either good or bad,
                                                  Inspected
        Nordstrom                             Display areas Attractive, well-organized,
                                                                                                                                         acceptable or unacceptable
        Department                                          stocked, good lighting                                                       Does not address degree of failure
        Store                                 Stockrooms
                                              S k             Rotation of goods,
                                                              R    i    f    d
                                                              organized, clean                                                Variables
                                              Salesclerks     Neat, courteous, very                                                      Measures dimensions such as weight,
                                                              knowledgeable                                                              speed, height, or strength
                                                                                                                                         Falls within an acceptable range
                                                                                                                              Use different statistical techniques
                                                                                   Table 6.4
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     6 - 73   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                         6 - 74




                                  TQM In Services                                                                                            Service Quality
                 Service quality is more difficult to                                                          The Operations Manager must
                 measure than the quality of goods                                                             recognize:

                 Service quality perceptions depend                                                                         1. The tangible component of
                 on                                                                                                            services is important
                            Intangible differences between                                                                  2. The service process is important
                            products                                                                                        3. The service is judged against the
                            Intangible expectations customers                                                                  customer’s expectations
                            have of those products                                                                          4. Exceptions will occur

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     6 - 75   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                         6 - 76




   Service
                                                                                                                         Determinants of Service
Specifications                                                                                                                  Quality
   at UPS                                                                                                  Reliability                                  Consistency of performance and dependability
                                                                                                           Responsiveness                               Willingness or readiness of employees
                                                                                                           Competence                                   Required skills and knowledge
                                                                                                           Access                                       Approachability and ease of contact
                                                                                                           Courtesy                                     Politeness, respect, consideration, friendliness
                                                                                                           Communication                                Keeping customers informed
                                                                                                           Credibility                                  Trustworthiness, believability, honesty
                                                                                                           Security                                     Freedom from danger, risk, or doubt
                                                                                                           Understanding/
                                                                                                                                                        Understand the customer’s needs
                                                                                                           knowing the customer
                                                                                                           Tangibles                                    Physical evidence of the service

                                                                                                                                                                                              Table 6.5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                     6 - 77   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                         6 - 78




                                                                                                                                                                                                                    13
10/16/2010




            Service Recovery Strategy

                        Managers should have a plan for
                        when services fail
                        Marriott’s LEARN routine
                                   Listen
                                                                                  All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
                                   Empathize                                   system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
                                                                                        recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
                                   Apologize                                                               Printed in the United States of America.

                                   React
                                   Notify


© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall   6 - 79   © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall                                    6 - 80




                                                                                                                                                                              14

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

HRM Dessler CH# 08
HRM Dessler CH# 08HRM Dessler CH# 08
HRM Dessler CH# 08Usman Rashid
 
HRM Dessler CH# 10
HRM Dessler CH# 10HRM Dessler CH# 10
HRM Dessler CH# 10Usman Rashid
 
全面品質管理 東吳王超弘
全面品質管理  東吳王超弘全面品質管理  東吳王超弘
全面品質管理 東吳王超弘營松 林
 
2. Man Pemeliharaan Sarana & Prasarana Resort - Karakteristik, Definisi, Tuju...
2. Man Pemeliharaan Sarana & Prasarana Resort - Karakteristik, Definisi, Tuju...2. Man Pemeliharaan Sarana & Prasarana Resort - Karakteristik, Definisi, Tuju...
2. Man Pemeliharaan Sarana & Prasarana Resort - Karakteristik, Definisi, Tuju...Irwan Haribudiman
 
Mengelola kualitas 1
Mengelola kualitas 1Mengelola kualitas 1
Mengelola kualitas 1ahmad fauzan
 
pengantar manajement
pengantar manajementpengantar manajement
pengantar manajementDissa MeLina
 
Metode Pemilihan dan Penetapan Lokasi Pabrik
Metode Pemilihan dan Penetapan Lokasi PabrikMetode Pemilihan dan Penetapan Lokasi Pabrik
Metode Pemilihan dan Penetapan Lokasi Pabrikhenrianto leo
 
Aleksandar djuricic surf na crvenom talasu
Aleksandar djuricic   surf na crvenom talasuAleksandar djuricic   surf na crvenom talasu
Aleksandar djuricic surf na crvenom talasuMarjan Babić
 
management chapter 11
management chapter 11management chapter 11
management chapter 11Dissa MeLina
 

La actualidad más candente (13)

HRM Dessler CH# 08
HRM Dessler CH# 08HRM Dessler CH# 08
HRM Dessler CH# 08
 
HRM Dessler CH# 10
HRM Dessler CH# 10HRM Dessler CH# 10
HRM Dessler CH# 10
 
全面品質管理 東吳王超弘
全面品質管理  東吳王超弘全面品質管理  東吳王超弘
全面品質管理 東吳王超弘
 
2. Man Pemeliharaan Sarana & Prasarana Resort - Karakteristik, Definisi, Tuju...
2. Man Pemeliharaan Sarana & Prasarana Resort - Karakteristik, Definisi, Tuju...2. Man Pemeliharaan Sarana & Prasarana Resort - Karakteristik, Definisi, Tuju...
2. Man Pemeliharaan Sarana & Prasarana Resort - Karakteristik, Definisi, Tuju...
 
Mengelola kualitas 1
Mengelola kualitas 1Mengelola kualitas 1
Mengelola kualitas 1
 
interviewing candidates-HRM
interviewing candidates-HRMinterviewing candidates-HRM
interviewing candidates-HRM
 
pengantar manajement
pengantar manajementpengantar manajement
pengantar manajement
 
Metode Pemilihan dan Penetapan Lokasi Pabrik
Metode Pemilihan dan Penetapan Lokasi PabrikMetode Pemilihan dan Penetapan Lokasi Pabrik
Metode Pemilihan dan Penetapan Lokasi Pabrik
 
Chap4
Chap4Chap4
Chap4
 
Human resource management (2)
Human resource management (2)Human resource management (2)
Human resource management (2)
 
Aleksandar djuricic surf na crvenom talasu
Aleksandar djuricic   surf na crvenom talasuAleksandar djuricic   surf na crvenom talasu
Aleksandar djuricic surf na crvenom talasu
 
management chapter 11
management chapter 11management chapter 11
management chapter 11
 
Manajemen Resiko PT KAI
Manajemen Resiko PT KAIManajemen Resiko PT KAI
Manajemen Resiko PT KAI
 

Destacado (20)

Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04
 
Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01
 
Heizer om10 ch10-work design
Heizer om10 ch10-work designHeizer om10 ch10-work design
Heizer om10 ch10-work design
 
Heizer om10 ch09-layout
Heizer om10 ch09-layoutHeizer om10 ch09-layout
Heizer om10 ch09-layout
 
Heizer om10 ch07_s-capacity
Heizer om10 ch07_s-capacityHeizer om10 ch07_s-capacity
Heizer om10 ch07_s-capacity
 
Heizer om10 ch11_r
Heizer om10 ch11_rHeizer om10 ch11_r
Heizer om10 ch11_r
 
Heizer om10 ch02
Heizer om10 ch02Heizer om10 ch02
Heizer om10 ch02
 
Heizer om10 ch03
Heizer om10 ch03Heizer om10 ch03
Heizer om10 ch03
 
Heizer om10 ch07-process startegy
Heizer om10 ch07-process startegyHeizer om10 ch07-process startegy
Heizer om10 ch07-process startegy
 
Heizer om10 mod_b-linear programming
Heizer om10 mod_b-linear programmingHeizer om10 mod_b-linear programming
Heizer om10 mod_b-linear programming
 
Heizer om10 ch08-location
Heizer om10 ch08-locationHeizer om10 ch08-location
Heizer om10 ch08-location
 
Summary research on c pk vs cp
Summary research on c pk vs cpSummary research on c pk vs cp
Summary research on c pk vs cp
 
6. process capability analysis (variable data)
6. process capability analysis (variable data)6. process capability analysis (variable data)
6. process capability analysis (variable data)
 
Chapter 05
Chapter 05Chapter 05
Chapter 05
 
253413062 heizer-om11-irm-ch07 s
253413062 heizer-om11-irm-ch07 s253413062 heizer-om11-irm-ch07 s
253413062 heizer-om11-irm-ch07 s
 
Production and operations managment notes
Production and operations managment notesProduction and operations managment notes
Production and operations managment notes
 
241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om
241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om
241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om
 
Heizer 07
Heizer 07Heizer 07
Heizer 07
 
Tqm
TqmTqm
Tqm
 
OPERATIONS STRATEGY
OPERATIONS STRATEGY OPERATIONS STRATEGY
OPERATIONS STRATEGY
 

Similar a Heizer om10 ch06-managing quality

Scopi qpr presentation-e-v8 7
Scopi qpr presentation-e-v8 7Scopi qpr presentation-e-v8 7
Scopi qpr presentation-e-v8 7bsarayreh
 
Maintenance performance analysis_en_v1
Maintenance performance analysis_en_v1Maintenance performance analysis_en_v1
Maintenance performance analysis_en_v1Alexander Stuber
 
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International Update
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International UpdateWPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International Update
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International UpdateDon Presant
 
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International Update
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning:  International UpdateWPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning:  International Update
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International UpdateDon Presant
 
Balanced Scorecard for CMMI Implementations - Eduardo Espinheira e Paula Gomes
Balanced Scorecard for CMMI Implementations - Eduardo Espinheira e Paula GomesBalanced Scorecard for CMMI Implementations - Eduardo Espinheira e Paula Gomes
Balanced Scorecard for CMMI Implementations - Eduardo Espinheira e Paula GomesPaula Gomes
 
Traffic Light Tool Presentation 2013
Traffic Light Tool Presentation 2013Traffic Light Tool Presentation 2013
Traffic Light Tool Presentation 2013michir
 
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)Beth Perez
 
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)Beth Perez
 
CBS IM56 March 2011
CBS IM56 March 2011CBS IM56 March 2011
CBS IM56 March 2011mcschlichter
 
TLMC Corporate Presentation-v 1.2
TLMC Corporate Presentation-v 1.2TLMC Corporate Presentation-v 1.2
TLMC Corporate Presentation-v 1.2Anil Balan
 
IBM Rational Software Conference 2009 Day 1 Keynote: Jamie Thomas
IBM Rational Software Conference 2009 Day 1 Keynote: Jamie ThomasIBM Rational Software Conference 2009 Day 1 Keynote: Jamie Thomas
IBM Rational Software Conference 2009 Day 1 Keynote: Jamie ThomasKathy (Kat) Mandelstein
 
Quality forum 2013 Lean Program Management February 15
Quality forum 2013 Lean Program Management February 15Quality forum 2013 Lean Program Management February 15
Quality forum 2013 Lean Program Management February 15Kile Brokop
 
Services Of Exercise Lean Group
Services Of Exercise Lean GroupServices Of Exercise Lean Group
Services Of Exercise Lean GroupExerciseLeanLLC
 
ITIL - mita se on?
ITIL - mita se on?ITIL - mita se on?
ITIL - mita se on?Ben Kalland
 
Heizer om10 ch11-supply chain
Heizer om10 ch11-supply chainHeizer om10 ch11-supply chain
Heizer om10 ch11-supply chainRozaimi Mohd Saad
 
4th Lean Sigma & Kaizen for Pharma R&D Conference, March 2011, Miami
4th Lean Sigma & Kaizen for Pharma R&D Conference, March 2011, Miami4th Lean Sigma & Kaizen for Pharma R&D Conference, March 2011, Miami
4th Lean Sigma & Kaizen for Pharma R&D Conference, March 2011, MiamiExL Pharma
 
LSS Idea Generation to Project Execution
LSS Idea Generation to Project ExecutionLSS Idea Generation to Project Execution
LSS Idea Generation to Project ExecutionAnand Subramaniam
 
Process performance models case study
Process performance models case studyProcess performance models case study
Process performance models case studyKobi Vider
 

Similar a Heizer om10 ch06-managing quality (20)

Heizer 06
Heizer 06Heizer 06
Heizer 06
 
Scopi qpr presentation-e-v8 7
Scopi qpr presentation-e-v8 7Scopi qpr presentation-e-v8 7
Scopi qpr presentation-e-v8 7
 
Maintenance performance analysis_en_v1
Maintenance performance analysis_en_v1Maintenance performance analysis_en_v1
Maintenance performance analysis_en_v1
 
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International Update
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International UpdateWPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International Update
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International Update
 
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International Update
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning:  International UpdateWPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning:  International Update
WPLAR 2010 - RPL in Workplace Learning: International Update
 
Balanced Scorecard for CMMI Implementations - Eduardo Espinheira e Paula Gomes
Balanced Scorecard for CMMI Implementations - Eduardo Espinheira e Paula GomesBalanced Scorecard for CMMI Implementations - Eduardo Espinheira e Paula Gomes
Balanced Scorecard for CMMI Implementations - Eduardo Espinheira e Paula Gomes
 
Traffic Light Tool Presentation 2013
Traffic Light Tool Presentation 2013Traffic Light Tool Presentation 2013
Traffic Light Tool Presentation 2013
 
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
 
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
Speaking with facts tq & od project dimensions(1)
 
CBS IM56 March 2011
CBS IM56 March 2011CBS IM56 March 2011
CBS IM56 March 2011
 
TLMC Corporate Presentation-v 1.2
TLMC Corporate Presentation-v 1.2TLMC Corporate Presentation-v 1.2
TLMC Corporate Presentation-v 1.2
 
IBM Rational Software Conference 2009 Day 1 Keynote: Jamie Thomas
IBM Rational Software Conference 2009 Day 1 Keynote: Jamie ThomasIBM Rational Software Conference 2009 Day 1 Keynote: Jamie Thomas
IBM Rational Software Conference 2009 Day 1 Keynote: Jamie Thomas
 
Quality forum 2013 Lean Program Management February 15
Quality forum 2013 Lean Program Management February 15Quality forum 2013 Lean Program Management February 15
Quality forum 2013 Lean Program Management February 15
 
Services Of Exercise Lean Group
Services Of Exercise Lean GroupServices Of Exercise Lean Group
Services Of Exercise Lean Group
 
ITIL - mita se on?
ITIL - mita se on?ITIL - mita se on?
ITIL - mita se on?
 
Heizer om10 ch11-supply chain
Heizer om10 ch11-supply chainHeizer om10 ch11-supply chain
Heizer om10 ch11-supply chain
 
4th Lean Sigma & Kaizen for Pharma R&D Conference, March 2011, Miami
4th Lean Sigma & Kaizen for Pharma R&D Conference, March 2011, Miami4th Lean Sigma & Kaizen for Pharma R&D Conference, March 2011, Miami
4th Lean Sigma & Kaizen for Pharma R&D Conference, March 2011, Miami
 
LSS Idea Generation to Project Execution
LSS Idea Generation to Project ExecutionLSS Idea Generation to Project Execution
LSS Idea Generation to Project Execution
 
Improvement
ImprovementImprovement
Improvement
 
Process performance models case study
Process performance models case studyProcess performance models case study
Process performance models case study
 

Más de Rozaimi Mohd Saad

Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability
Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliabilityHeizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability
Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliabilityRozaimi Mohd Saad
 
Heizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operations
Heizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operationsHeizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operations
Heizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operationsRozaimi Mohd Saad
 
Heizer om10 ch13-aggregate planning
Heizer om10 ch13-aggregate planningHeizer om10 ch13-aggregate planning
Heizer om10 ch13-aggregate planningRozaimi Mohd Saad
 
Heizer om10 ch11_s-outsourching
Heizer om10 ch11_s-outsourchingHeizer om10 ch11_s-outsourching
Heizer om10 ch11_s-outsourchingRozaimi Mohd Saad
 
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line modelsHeizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line modelsRozaimi Mohd Saad
 

Más de Rozaimi Mohd Saad (7)

Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability
Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliabilityHeizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability
Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability
 
Heizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operations
Heizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operationsHeizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operations
Heizer om10 ch16-jit and lean operations
 
Heizer om10 ch14-mrp
Heizer om10 ch14-mrpHeizer om10 ch14-mrp
Heizer om10 ch14-mrp
 
Heizer om10 ch13-aggregate planning
Heizer om10 ch13-aggregate planningHeizer om10 ch13-aggregate planning
Heizer om10 ch13-aggregate planning
 
Heizer om10 ch12-inventory
Heizer om10 ch12-inventoryHeizer om10 ch12-inventory
Heizer om10 ch12-inventory
 
Heizer om10 ch11_s-outsourching
Heizer om10 ch11_s-outsourchingHeizer om10 ch11_s-outsourching
Heizer om10 ch11_s-outsourching
 
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line modelsHeizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
 

Heizer om10 ch06-managing quality

  • 1. 10/16/2010 Managing Quality Outline 6 Global Company Profile: Arnold Palmer Hospital Quality and Strategy PowerPoint presentation to accompany Defining Quality gQ y Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Implications of Quality Principles of Operations Management, 8e Malcolm Baldrige National Quality PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl Award Cost of Quality (COQ) Ethics and Quality Management © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-2 Outline – Continued Outline – Continued International Quality Standards Total Quality Management ISO 9000 Continuous Improvement ISO14000 Six Sigma Employee Empowerment Benchmarking Just-in-Time (JIT) Taguchi Concepts Knowledge of TQM Tools © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-3 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-4 Outline – Continued Outline – Continued Tools of TQM The Role of Inspection Check Sheets When and Where to Inspect Scatter Diagrams p Source Inspection Cause-and-Effect Diagrams Service Industry Inspection Pareto Charts Inspection of Attributes versus Flowcharts Variables Histograms TQM in Services Statistical Process Control (SPC) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-5 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-6 1
  • 2. 10/16/2010 Learning Objectives Managing Quality Provides a When you complete this chapter you Competitive Advantage should be able to: Arnold Palmer Hospital 1. Define quality and TQM 2. Describe the ISO international Deliver over 16,000 babies annually quality standards Virtually every type of quality tool is 3. Explain Six Sigma employed 4. Explain how benchmarking is used Continuous improvement Employee empowerment 5. Explain quality robust products and Taguchi concepts Benchmarking Just-in-time 6. Use the seven tools of TQM Quality tools © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-7 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-8 Quality and Strategy Quality and Strategy An operations manager’s objective Managing quality supports is to build a total quality differentiation, low cost, and management system that identifies g y response strategies and satisfies customer needs Quality helps firms increase sales and reduce costs Building a quality organization is a demanding task © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-9 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 10 Two Ways Quality The Flow of Activities Improves Profitability Organizational Practices Leadership, Mission statement, Effective operating Sales Gains via procedures, Staff support, Training Yields: What is important and what is to be Improved response accomplished Quality Principles Flexible pricing Customer focus, Continuous improvement, Benchmarking, Just-in-time, Just in time Tools of TQM Improved reputation Yields: How to do what is important and to be Improved Increased accomplished Quality Profits Employee Fulfillment Reduced Costs via Empowerment, Organizational commitment Increased productivity Yields: Employee attitudes that can accomplish what is important Lower rework and scrap costs Customer Satisfaction Winning orders, Repeat customers Lower warranty costs Yields: An effective organization with Figure 6.2 a competitive advantage Figure 6.1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 11 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 12 2
  • 3. 10/16/2010 Defining Quality Different Views User-based User-based: better performance, more features The totality of features and characteristics of a product or Manufacturing-based Manufacturing-based: service that bears on its ability to conformance t standards, f to t d d satisfy stated or implied needs making it right the first time Product-based Product-based: specific and American Society for Quality measurable attributes of the product © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 13 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 14 Implications of Quality Key Dimensions of Quality 1. Company reputation Perception of new products Performance Durability Employment practices Features Serviceability Supplier relations Reliability Aesthetics 2. Product liability Conformance Perceived quality Reduce risk Value 3. Global implications Improved ability to compete © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 15 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 16 Malcolm Baldrige National Baldrige Criteria Quality Award Applicants are evaluated on: Established in 1988 by the U.S. Categories Points government Leadership 120 Designed to promote TQM practices Strategic Planning 85 Recent winners include Customer & Market Focus 85 Honeywell Federal, Midway USA, Measurement, Analysis, and AtlantiCare, Heartland Health, Cargill Knowledge Management 90 Corn Milling, PRO-TEC Coating Co., Workforce Focus 85 City of Coral Springs, Premier Inc., Process Management 85 Sunny Fresh Foods, Park Place Lexus, Richland College Results 450 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 17 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 18 3
  • 4. 10/16/2010 Takumi Costs of Quality A Japanese character Prevention costs - reducing the that symbolizes a potential for defects broader dimension Appraisal costs - evaluating than quality, a deeper products, parts, and services process than Internal failure - producing defective education, and a more parts or service before delivery perfect method than persistence External costs - defects discovered after delivery © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 19 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 20 Costs of Quality Leaders in Quality Leader Philosophy/Contribution Total Total Cost W. Edwards Deming 14 Points for Cost Management External Failure Joseph M. Juran p Top management p g commitment, fitness for Internal Failure use Armand Feigenbaum Total Quality Control Prevention Philip B. Crosby Quality is Free, zero Appraisal defects Quality Improvement Table 6.1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 21 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 22 Ethics and Quality International Quality Management Standards Operations managers must deliver healthy, safe, quality products and ISO 9000 series (Europe/EC) services Common quality standards for products sold in Europe (even if made in U.S.) US) Poor quality risks injuries, lawsuits, recalls, and regulation 2008 update places greater emphasis on leadership and customer requirements Organizations are judged by how and satisfaction they respond to problems ISO 14000 series (Europe/EC) All stakeholders much be considered © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 23 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 24 4
  • 5. 10/16/2010 ISO 14000 ISO 14000 Environmental Standard Environmental Standard Core Elements: Advantages: Positive public image and reduced Environmental management g exposure to liability p y Auditing Systematic approach to pollution Performance evaluation prevention Labeling Compliance with regulatory requirements and opportunities for Life cycle assessment competitive advantage Reduction in multiple audits © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 25 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 26 TQM Deming’s Fourteen Points 1. Create consistency of purpose Encompasses entire organization, 2. Lead to promote change from supplier to customer 3. Build quality into the product; stop Stresses a commitment by y depe d g o depending on inspections spect o s management to have a continuing, 4. Build long-term relationships based on companywide drive toward performance instead of awarding excellence in all aspects of products business on price and services that are important to the 5. Continuously improve product, quality, customer and service Table 6.2 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 27 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 28 Deming’s Fourteen Points Deming’s Fourteen Points 6. Start training 12. Remove barriers to pride in work 7. Emphasize leadership 13. Institute education and self- 8. Drive out fear improvement 9. Break d 9 B k down b i barriers between b t 14. Put everyone to work on the departments transformation 10. Stop haranguing workers 11. Support, help, and improve Table 6.2 Table 6.2 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 29 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 30 5
  • 6. 10/16/2010 Seven Concepts of TQM Continuous Improvement 1. Continuous improvement 2. Six Sigma Represents continual improvement of all processes 3. Employee empowerment 4. Benchmarking Involves all operations and work centers including suppliers and 5. Just-in-time (JIT) customers 6. Taguchi concepts People, Equipment, Materials, 7. Knowledge of TQM tools Procedures © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 31 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 32 Shewhart’s PDCA Model Six Sigma 4. Act 1.Plan Two meanings Implement Identify the Statistical definition of a process that the plan pattern and is 99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per document make a plan million opportunities (DPMO) A program designed to reduce 3. Check 2. Do defects, lower costs, and improve Is the plan Test the customer satisfaction working? plan Figure 6.3 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 33 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 34 Six Sigma Six Sigma Program Lower limits Upper limits Two meanings Originally developed by Motorola, 2,700 defects/million adopted and enhanced by Statistical definition of a process that Honeywell and GE 3.4 defects/million is 99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO) Highly structured approach to A program designed to reduce process improvement defects, lower costs, Mean improve and A strategy customer satisfaction Figure 6.4 ±3σ ±6σ A discipline - DMAIC 6σ © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 35 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 36 6
  • 7. 10/16/2010 Six Sigma Six Sigma Implementation 1. Define critical outputs Emphasize defects per million and identify gaps for opportunities as a standard metric improvement DMAIC Approach Provide extensive training 2. Measure the work and collect process data Focus on corporate sponsor support (Champions) 3. Analyze the data Create qualified process improvement 4. Improve the process experts (Black Belts, Green Belts, etc.) 5. Control the new process to Set stretch objectives make sure new performance This cannot be accomplished without a major is maintained commitment from top level management © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 37 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 38 Employee Empowerment Quality Circles Getting employees involved in product and process improvements Group of employees who meet 85% of quality problems are due regularly to solve problems to process and material Trained in planning, problem Techniques solving, and statistical methods l i d t ti ti l th d Build communication networks that include employees Often led by a facilitator Develop open, supportive supervisors Very effective when done Move responsibility to employees properly Build a high-morale organization Create formal team structures © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 39 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 40 Benchmarking Best Practices for Resolving Selecting best practices to use as a Customer Complaints standard for performance Best Practice Justification 1. Determine what to Make it easy for clients It is free market research benchmark to complain Respond quickly to It adds customers and loyalty 2. Form a benchmark team complaints Resolve complaints on It reduces cost 3. Identify benchmarking partners first contact 4. Collect and analyze benchmarking Use computers to Discover trends, share them, and align manage complaints your services information Recruit the best for It should be part of formal training and 5. Take action to match or exceed the customer service jobs career advancement benchmark Table 6.3 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 41 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 42 7
  • 8. 10/16/2010 Just-in- Just-in-Time (JIT) Just-in- Just-in-Time (JIT) Relationship to quality: ‘Pull’ system of production scheduling including supply management JIT cuts the cost of quality Production only when signaled JIT i improves quality lit Allows reduced inventory levels Better quality means less Inventory costs money and hides process inventory and better, easier-to- and material problems employ JIT system Encourages improved process and product quality © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 43 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 44 Just-In- Just-In-Time (JIT) Example Just-In- Just-In-Time (JIT) Example Reducing inventory reveals problems so they can be solved Work in process inventory level (hides problems) Unreliable Capacity Unreliable Capacity Vendors Scrap Vendors Scrap Imbalances Imbalances © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 45 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 46 Taguchi Concepts Quality Robustness Engineering and experimental design methods to improve product Ability to produce products and process design uniformly in adverse manufacturing Identify key component and process and environmental conditions variables affecting product variation i bl ff ti d t i ti Remove the effects of adverse Taguchi Concepts conditions Quality robustness Small variations in materials and process do not destroy product Quality loss function quality Target-oriented quality © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 47 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 48 8
  • 9. 10/16/2010 Quality Loss Function Quality Loss Function Shows that costs increase as the High loss L = D2C Unacceptable where product moves away from what Loss (to producing Poor L = loss to society D = distance from the customer wants organization, customer, Fair target value and society) Good C = cost of deviation Costs include customer Low loss Best Target-oriented quality T t i t d lit dissatisfaction, warranty yields more product in the “best” category and service, internal Target-oriented quality scrap and repair, and costs to Frequency brings product toward the target value society Conformance-oriented quality keeps products within 3 standard Traditional conformance deviations Lower Target Upper specifications are too simplistic Specification Figure 6.5 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 49 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 50 Tools of TQM Tools of TQM Tools for Generating Ideas Tools for Identifying Problems Check sheets Histogram Scatter diagrams Statistical process control chart Cause-and-effect diagrams Tools to Organize the Data Pareto charts Flowcharts © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 51 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 52 Seven Tools of TQM Seven Tools of TQM (a) Check Sheet: An organized method of (b) Scatter Diagram: A graph of the value recording data of one variable vs. another variable Hour Defect D f t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Productivity A /// / / / / /// / B // / / / // /// C / // // //// Absenteeism Figure 6.6 Figure 6.6 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 53 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 54 9
  • 10. 10/16/2010 Seven Tools of TQM Seven Tools of TQM (c) Cause-and-Effect Diagram: A tool that (d) Pareto Chart: A graph to identify and plot identifies process elements (causes) that problems or defects in descending order of might effect an outcome frequency Cause Materials Methods Frequency Effect Percent Manpower Machinery A B C D E Figure 6.6 Figure 6.6 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 55 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 56 Seven Tools of TQM Seven Tools of TQM (e) Flowchart (Process Diagram): A chart that (f) Histogram: A distribution showing the describes the steps in a process frequency of occurrences of a variable Distribution Frequency Repair time (minutes) Figure 6.6 Figure 6.6 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 57 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 58 Seven Tools of TQM Cause-and- Cause-and-Effect Diagrams (g) Statistical Process Control Chart: A chart with Material Method (ball) (shooting process) time on the horizontal axis to plot values of a Grain/Feel Aiming point statistic (grip) Size of ball Air pressure Bend knees Hand position Balance Lopsidedness L id d Follow-through Upper control limit Missed Training free-throws Rim size Target value Conditioning Motivation Rim height Lower control limit Backboard Consistency Rim alignment stability Concentration Time Machine Manpower (hoop & Figure 6.7 Figure 6.6 (shooter) backboard) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 59 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 60 10
  • 11. 10/16/2010 Pareto Charts Flow Charts Data for October – 100 MRI Flowchart 70 – – 93 – 88 1. Physician schedules MRI 7. If unsatisfactory, repeat 60 – 2. Patient taken to MRI 8. Patient taken back to room 54 Frequency (number) rcent – 72 3. Patient signs in 9. MRI read by radiologist 50 – 4. Patient is prepped p pp 10. MRI report transferred to p Cumulative per 40 – 5. Technician carries out MRI physician Number of 6. Technician inspects film 11. Patient and physician discuss 30 – occurrences 20 – 12 10 – 8 4 3 2 80% 0 – 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 Room svc Check-in Pool hours Minibar Misc. 9 10 72% 16% 5% 4% 3% 20% Causes and percent of the total © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 61 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 62 Statistical Process Control An SPC Chart (SPC) Plots the percent of free throws missed Uses statistics and control charts to tell when to take corrective action 20% Upper control limit Drives process improvement p p Four key steps 10% Coach’s target value Measure the process When a change is indicated, find the 0% | | | | | | | | | Lower control limit assignable cause 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Eliminate or incorporate the cause Game number Restart the revised process Figure 6.8 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 63 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 64 Inspection When and Where to Inspect Involves examining items to see if 1. At the supplier’s plant while the supplier is an item is good or defective producing 2. At your facility upon receipt of goods from Detect a defective product the supplier Does not correct deficiencies in 3. Before costly or irreversible processes process or product 4. During the step-by-step production It is expensive process Issues 5. When production or service is complete When to inspect 6. Before delivery to your customer Where in process to inspect 7. At the point of customer contact © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 65 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 66 11
  • 12. 10/16/2010 Inspection Source Inspection Many problems Worker fatigue Also known as source control Measurement error The next step in the process is Process variability your customer Cannot inspect quality into a Ensure perfect product product to your customer Robust design, empowered Poka-yoke is the concept of foolproof devices employees, and sound processes or techniques designed to pass only are better solutions acceptable product © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 67 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 68 Service Industry Inspection Service Industry Inspection What is What is Organization Standard Organization Standard Inspected Inspected Jones Law Office Receptionist Is phone answered by the Hard Rock Hotel Reception Use customer’s name performance second ring desk Billing Billi Accurate, timely, and A i l d Doorman D Greet guest in less than 30 G i l h correct format seconds Attorney Promptness in returning Room All lights working, spotless calls bathroom Minibar Restocked and charges accurately posted to bill Table 6.4 Table 6.4 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 69 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 70 Service Industry Inspection Service Industry Inspection What is What is Organization Standard Organization Standard Inspected Inspected Arnold Palmer Billing Accurate, timely, and Olive Garden Busboy Serves water and bread Hospital correct format Restaurant within 1 minute Pharmacy Ph Prescription accuracy, P i i Busboy B b Clears all entrée items and Cl ll é i d inventory accuracy crumbs prior to dessert Lab Audit for lab-test accuracy Waiter Knows and suggest Nurses Charts immediately specials, desserts updated Admissions Data entered correctly and completely Table 6.4 Table 6.4 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 71 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 72 12
  • 13. 10/16/2010 Service Industry Inspection Attributes Versus Variables Attributes What is Organization Standard Items are either good or bad, Inspected Nordstrom Display areas Attractive, well-organized, acceptable or unacceptable Department stocked, good lighting Does not address degree of failure Store Stockrooms S k Rotation of goods, R i f d organized, clean Variables Salesclerks Neat, courteous, very Measures dimensions such as weight, knowledgeable speed, height, or strength Falls within an acceptable range Use different statistical techniques Table 6.4 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 73 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 74 TQM In Services Service Quality Service quality is more difficult to The Operations Manager must measure than the quality of goods recognize: Service quality perceptions depend 1. The tangible component of on services is important Intangible differences between 2. The service process is important products 3. The service is judged against the Intangible expectations customers customer’s expectations have of those products 4. Exceptions will occur © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 75 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 76 Service Determinants of Service Specifications Quality at UPS Reliability Consistency of performance and dependability Responsiveness Willingness or readiness of employees Competence Required skills and knowledge Access Approachability and ease of contact Courtesy Politeness, respect, consideration, friendliness Communication Keeping customers informed Credibility Trustworthiness, believability, honesty Security Freedom from danger, risk, or doubt Understanding/ Understand the customer’s needs knowing the customer Tangibles Physical evidence of the service Table 6.5 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 77 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 78 13
  • 14. 10/16/2010 Service Recovery Strategy Managers should have a plan for when services fail Marriott’s LEARN routine Listen All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval Empathize system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Apologize Printed in the United States of America. React Notify © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 79 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6 - 80 14