Mobileland EDUCAUSE 2012
•Descargar como PPTX, PDF•
1 recomendación•330 vistas
Slides used during the debriefing of the Mobileland workshop during the 2012 EDUCAUSE conference. https://sites.google.com/site/mccmobileland/channeling-lewis-carol
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (16)
Similar a Mobileland EDUCAUSE 2012
Similar a Mobileland EDUCAUSE 2012 (20)
Más de Shelley Rodrigo
Más de Shelley Rodrigo (16)
Mobileland EDUCAUSE 2012
- 1. What are mobile devices? • full-sized laptop computer • lightweight netbook or tablet computer • dedicated e-book reader • Handheld device • cell/mobile vs. smartphone CC image posted at Flickr by andyi
- 2. “In terms of demographic profiling, a surprising finding is that older students tended to favor tablets (p=0.0004), smartphones (p<0.0001), and e-readers (p=0.0082) over younger students. Cost could be a factor here, with younger students not having the purchasing power to acquire these devices. But regardless of the reason, these data suggest that students transitioning directly form secondary to postsecondary education are not prepared to use these devices as academic tools, or at least haven’t found them to be very or extremely importantNational Study of Undergraduate ECAR yet.” Students and Information Technology, 2012 Who Owns Smartphones? Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, Summer Tracking Survey, August 7-September 6, 2012. N=3,014 adults ages 18 and older. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish and on landline and cell phones (1,206 cell calls were completed). Margin of error is +/- 2 percentage points.
- 4. Mobile Internet use, by demographics Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project’s August Tracking Survey conducted July 25-August 26, 2011. N=2,260 adults age 18 and older, including 916 interviews conducted by cell phone. Interviews were conducted in both English and
- 5. Smartphone ownership demographics Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project April 26-May 22, 2011 and January 20-February 19, 2012 tracking surveys. For 2011 data, n=2,277 adults ages 18 and older, including 755 interviews conducted on respondent’s cell phone. For 2012 data, n=2,253 adults and survey includes 901 cell phone interviews. Both 2011 and 2012 data include Spanish-language interviews.
- 6. Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, April 26 – May 22, 2011 Spring Tracking Survey. n=2,277 adult internet users ages 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish.
- 7. Which cell internet users go online mostly using their phones? Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, March 15-April 3, 2012 Tracking survey. N=2,254 adults ages 18 and older, including 903 interviews conducted on respondent’s cell phone. Margin of error is +/-3.7 percentage points based on those who use the internet or email on their cell phone (n=929). *Represents significant difference compared with non- starred rows in group. **Represents significant difference compared with all other rows in group.
- 9. Source: ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2011
- 10. Source: ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2012
- 11. Source: ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2012
- 12. 2011 Horizon Report 2012 Horizon Report Time-to-Adoption Time-to-Adoption One Year or Less One Year or Less • Electronic Books • Mobile Apps • Mobiles • Tablet Computing Two to Three Years Two to Three Years • Augmented Reality • Game-Based Learning • Game-Based Learning • Learning Analytics Four to Five Years Four to Five Years • Gesture-Based Computing • Gesture-Based Computing • Learning Analytics • Internet of Things
- 13. Source: ECAR National Study of Undergra duate Students and Informati on Technolog y, 2010
- 14. *indicates statistically significant differences compared with whites. Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, April 26 – May 22, 2011 Spring Tracking Survey. n=2,277 adults ages 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish.
- 15. Mobile Teaching vs. Mobile Learning • Higher education historically has focused on instructors teaching rather than students learning, an ineffective approach that could seriously hamper the promise of mobile learning. • Successful student learning emerges from active engagement, connection to the students' prior knowledge, and simulation of real world experiences — all facilitated by engaging learners' senses through multimedia. • Higher education should stop thinking about these powerful mobile multimedia devices as only consumption devices — to live up to the promise of mobile learning, students http://bit.ly/MobileTeach
- 16. “Given students’ ownership of Students and preference for • are unconfident that they small, mobile have the technology skills to devices, institutions and meet their needs. instructors may have an • want/need for instructors opportunity to make more to model incorporating effective use of mobile technology into technologies to communicate teaching, learning, and with, educate, and support research. students. Many students seem eager to communicate more with their instructors online, to use their mobile devices for coursework, and to reach out for help when they Source: ECAR National Study of Undergraduate need it.” Students and Information Technology, 2011
- 17. Among students who use a smartphone for academics, • 44% use an iPhone • 46& use an Android device Source: ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2012
- 18. CC image posted at Flickr by Roozbeh Rokni
- 19. CIOs & Institutions Although… “In general, IT organizations believe they are reasonably well prepared to meet the expected demands for mobile computing across the four areas of general communication, instruction, administration, and research.” • More than 1/3, no spending on mobile-enablement • Varied staffing levels dedicated to mobile • 40% did not mobile-enable any service • More services geared towards students ECAR Report: Mobile IT in Higher Education, 2011
- 20. Why mobile learning? Source: ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2011
- 21. How mobile composition? Process: Emphasis on Invention Multimodal Production CC image posted at Flickr by Nar8iv / Scott W CC image posted at Flickr by Nils Geylen
- 22. How will we support it? CIOs & Institutions Although… “In general, IT organizations believe they are reasonably well prepared to meet the expected demands for mobile computing across the four areas of general communication, instruction, administration, and research.” • More than 1/3, no spending on mobile-enablement • Varied staffing levels dedicated to mobile • 40% did not mobile-enable any service • More services geared towards students ECAR Report: Mobile IT in Higher Education, 2011
Notas del editor
- ECAR 2011 survey:• A full-sized laptop computer is one that is designed to be portable; it usually weighs more than two pounds; the keyboard and monitor are usually attached to each other. • A lightweight netbook or tablet computer is highly portable; it usually weighs less than two pounds; its monitor is small (usually 10” or less) and the keyboard may be small and built in or the keys may be displayed in video on a touch screen. iPad is included here. • A dedicated e-book reader is a portable device whose sole function is as a platform for reading electronic books and certain other electronic publications. Examples include the Kindle, NOOK, and the like; iPad and similar tablet devices serve many other functions and so are not included here. • A handheld device is usually about the size of a cellular telephone and often includes one; it has a screen that can show e-mail messages, web pages, video, etc.; and its keyboard is a few inches across, at most. We are not interested in devices that are plain cellular phones or are music/video players only, such as certain iPods. Pew: smartphone defined as adults who either say their phone is a smartphone when asked or say their phoen runs on the Android, blackberry, iPhone, Palm, or Windows platforms.
- NOTICE DATE… SEPT 2012And as of 2011, 56.24% of Americans have attended college (some college PhD): http://www.census.gov/hhes/socdemo/education/data/cps/2011/tables.html (US Census data)
- 88% cell phone; EDUCAUSE doesn’t even ask undergrads whether they own a cell phone; only if smartphoneDesktop down while laptop going upSpikes in e-reader & tablets (chuckle over tablet; both Susan and I had them before they were cheap…I miss mini-me)
- Over number of those attending/have attended college;Average college age ranges- high %Transition on “no statistical significance”
- Want to especially focus on growth in Race/Ethnicity less than one yearWhite—15%Black & Hispanic – 5% --STILL HIGHER
- Mobile Access Gap…Black & Hispanic mostly go online through mobileLower income householdsTELL STORY ABOUT MY MESA PROJECT
- UGH…this begins to blow up the story I want to make about socio-economics & access…10% is still a recognizable number
- HOWEVER…Students at two-year institutions differ from other undergraduates in their technology ownership and preferences. Students at associate’s colleges and other two-year programs are more likely to own stationary technologies, such as desktop computers and stationary gaming and video devices, particularly in comparison to students at doctorate-granting institutions. Students at institutions that award master’s and doctorate degrees are more likely to own portable technologies, such as laptops, iPods, webcams, thumb drives, and Wi-Fi devices. Still, there are both mobile devices (e.g., iPads) and stationary technologies (e.g., HDTVs) for which there are no significant differences among students at institutions of different Carnegie Classifications. In addition, the preference for Windows platforms is significantly higher among students attending associate’s colleges or other two-year programs than it is among those attending other institutions. Seventy four percent of students at associate’s colleges prefer Windows PCs, compared to 58 percent of all other students.
- THE INTERNET OF THINGShe Internet of Things has become a sort of shorthand for network-aware smart objects that connect the physical world with the world of information. A smart object has four key attributes: it is small, and thus easy to attach to almost anything; it has a unique identifier; it has a small store of data or information; and it has a way to communicate that information to an external device on demand. The Internet of Things extends that concept by using TCP/IP as the means to convey the information, thus making objects addressable (and findable) on the Internet.
- My Rant…EDUCAUSE Quarterly, March 29, 2011
- BYOD—you’ve scene what forcing a colleague or student on to a platform in a computer lab does…???Hacking—think of it as an aspect of the rhetorical context…http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/more-us-consumers-choosing-smartphones-as-apple-closes-the-gap-on-android/
- http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/who-owns-smartphones-in-the-us/
- http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/mobile-it-higher-education-2011-reportECAR Report: Mobile IT in Higher Education, 2011“Institutions pursuing a balanced approach to mobile development—one that includes elements from several strategies, such as mobile web, native apps, or mobile frameworks—tend to report greater progress.”Mobile frameworks: cell coverage and ubiquitouswi-fi
- http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/mobile-it-higher-education-2011-reportECAR Report: Mobile IT in Higher Education, 2011“Institutions pursuing a balanced approach to mobile development—one that includes elements from several strategies, such as mobile web, native apps, or mobile frameworks—tend to report greater progress.”Mobile frameworks: cell coverage and ubiquitouswi-fi